Blizzard sues OGN - Page 5
Forum Index > Community News and Headlines |
mdb
Bulgaria4058 Posts
| ||
251
United States1401 Posts
From the way it sounds, this lawsuit, if a win for Blizzard's side, would shut down Proleague, but OSL could continue. Either way MBC would be f'ed in the a. Also for all the people that are like OMG BLAME ACTIVISION SO EVIL, get a clue people. This is Blizzard's lawsuit in the end. They didn't whisper into Blizzard's ear "hey, want to make more money? Go sue the Korean broadcasting companies." Blizzard knows how to get filthy rich and became profit obsessed on their own (see: WoW). | ||
Zozo
Brazil2579 Posts
| ||
simme123
Sweden810 Posts
| ||
konadora
Singapore66063 Posts
- wtf... OGN too? - now they're after OGN as well. - holy... - just seal the negotiation already, damn kespa - fuck - dog gretech - now everything's being wrapped up one-by-one. - i hope everything gets resolved TT - OSL is illegal too? thought they negotiated that? looks like they're in cahoots with MBCGame kekeke - even OGN.. no wonder there was only "happy money" (t/n: form of voucher giveaways) at the end credits in Ro36 - lol starcraft 1 - already expected, they said they already sent letters and if OGN/MBC proceeded, they will sue the companies. - bye sc1 - this is driving me crazy, bring to international court maybe? keke - stop saying "illegal, illegal", if the fans want it, they have all the rights to broadcast! - both with dollar signs in their eyes... kespa helped esports to grow through extortion and now blizzard's extorting money back lol - GG yo - we might not know if OGN/MBC/KeSPA team up! - just end it already. | ||
RebirthOfLeGenD
USA5860 Posts
On November 04 2010 22:39 Katsuge wrote: i hate it cos all blizz is talking is about their rights their rights...;/ User was temp banned for this post. Err, I don't really see why this guy was banned for this post? Just the bad grammar? I would readily admit that the only thing blizzard has done is CTRLV "our rights" all over the place and blow smoke up our asses about them wanting bw/sc2 to run side by side and that they would run their own leagues and shit. Its just absurd. Anyway, I don't see how the Korean Air OSL can even be shut down. I remember that MONTHS ago OGN agreed to terms with OGN and only MBC couldn't come to an agreement. I suppose this is over OGN broadcasting Proleague without purchasing the rights, but how can they shut down the OSL because of that when they actually have the rights to it? | ||
Ryo
8787 Posts
On November 04 2010 23:54 McDonalds wrote: Can you even watch the GSL on TV at this point? I was under the impression that the GSL stream numbers included the Korean viewership. Yes, that was my impression as well. | ||
oneofthem
Cayman Islands24199 Posts
On November 04 2010 23:38 HeaDStrong wrote: well in your post you jump to the conclusion that blizzard has the rights in the first place, in that case you are correct. but what most of us are arguing about whether they actually do have those rights. Creating a computer game does not automatically create a huge scene with loads of sponsored teams, televised matches and high level play. this is where the fight is right now. they haven't won the case so far and claimed the rights to be theirs. so your described situation becomes more like them suing a competitor because it hurts their revenue. you seem to be implying that an organization like kespa has legitimacy because it exists apart from the effort blizzard put into bw. this is not the case legally speaking. still, i was not talking about legitimacy at all, just the economic and business logic at work. the legal rights are a tool to be wielded for business ends. blizzard's legal situation did not change from 2000 to today, what has changed is that they have a stake in progaming now that they've devised a way to extract revenue from it. now, kespa is not exactly your community cooperative sc league. they are quite aggressive in using the power of licensing as well, to the extent of coercing players. i don't have a horse in this race as far as the companies are concerned, i'm just not sure how the players and fans would be treated in the process. | ||
JWD
United States12607 Posts
| ||
snowdrift
France2061 Posts
I hope KeSPA and the broadcasters stand shoulder-to-shoulder and crush Blizzard. I like how Blizz didn't sue them all at once, which would've showed their hand and made it too obvious they intend to kill BW. They're trying to pick them apart one by one. I don't think it'll work. | ||
Weedk
United States507 Posts
On November 05 2010 00:02 konadora wrote: - both with dollar signs in their eyes... kespa helped esports to grow through extortion and now blizzard's extorting money back lol Pretty much this. I'm still leaning more towards KeSPA though. If KeSPA loses and the leagues go down, I'm worried that a lot of the players will get screwed. There's no league structure for SC2 and no guaranteed salaries. To think if none of this legal nasty stuff happened, KeSPA might actually be supporting SC2 in some way... | ||
C.W.
88 Posts
€dit: "- stop saying "illegal, illegal", if they fans want it, they have all the rights to broadcast!" This is ridiculous. | ||
aru
183 Posts
On November 05 2010 00:02 RebirthOfLeGenD wrote: Anyway, I don't see how the Korean Air OSL can even be shut down. I remember that MONTHS ago OGN agreed to terms with OGN and only MBC couldn't come to an agreement. I suppose this is over OGN broadcasting Proleague without purchasing the rights, but how can they shut down the OSL because of that when they actually have the rights to it? They bought the rights to "Korean Air OSL 2", not "2010 Bacchus OSL". Every tournament you run requires you to buy another license. It's just coincidence that since the GSL started, they couldn't come to another agreement! | ||
HeaDStrong
Scotland785 Posts
On November 05 2010 00:06 oneofthem wrote: you seem to be implying that an organization like kespa has legitimacy because it exists apart from the effort blizzard put into bw. this is not the case legally speaking. still, i was not talking about legitimacy at all, just the economic and business logic at work. the legal rights are a tool to be wielded for business ends. blizzard's legal situation did not change from 2000 to today, what has changed is that they have a stake in progaming now that they've devised a way to extract revenue from it. now, kespa is not exactly your community cooperative sc league. they are quite aggressive in using the power of licensing as well, to the extent of coercing players. i don't have a horse in this race as far as the companies are concerned, i'm just not sure how the players and fans would be treated in the process. All I was saying is that I am not fully convinced that by creating a video game you automatically own everything that is created by it. I don't think blizzard gets much credit for all the fangirls going crazy and shouting when Flash used a d-matrixed dropship as an elevator to load Jaedongs base full with MnM and take out his tech. Or do you think all the fans turned up to that even because how awesomely Blizzard had designed all those sprites. You see what I mean? What OGN/MBC/KeSPA are selling is not quite what Blizzard had produced. Sure Blizzard deserves a part of the cake, but from what I recall their requests in the negotiations wasn't a piece of the cake, it was the whole cake and also the knife and all the plates to serve it. In my view this is unreasonable from them and they are waaay in the wrong here. I agree that KeSPA is a nasty organization, but KeSPA is a representative organization of all the pro teams involved. If KeSPA loses, the core of esports is gone and I am sure as hell Blizzard will not replace it. What happens from then is rather unpredictable but certainly not for good. | ||
leonardus
59 Posts
| ||
leakingpear
United Kingdom302 Posts
I mean how were you all not expecting this one, they said they would if OGN continued unabated, it's clearly going to come under the same IP rights situation, in actuality it would be far more absurd if they didn't do this (provided there wasn't a change by OGN to fit to the previous negotiation's stipulations) as it would mean that Blizzard was unfairly targeting one corporation and would sink their entire protection of IP rights case due to the selectivism of it. Oh and i'm really not going to reply to anyone over this stuff as it just gives me headaches trying to deal with the starcraft equivalent of creationists and yes I realise how remarkably arrogant and superior that sounds. edit: I don't really know how to tone this down JWD, i'm not making personal attacks on people but I guess it's somewhat inflammatory, it's just very much like arguing with a dining room table, to quote Barney Frank. | ||
snowdrift
France2061 Posts
On November 05 2010 00:21 leakingpear wrote: Why is it every single one of these threads consists of the same uninformed knee jerk reactionary titwank, then 20 pages of people trying to explain that neither sides actions can be equated to the pre-school esque logic that said knee jerk titwank attempts to correlate it to, while being rebuked by said reactionary titwankees? I mean how were you all not expecting this one, they said they would if OGN continued unabated, it's clearly going to come under the same IP rights situation, in actuality it would be far more absurd if they didn't do this (provided there wasn't a change by OGN to fit to the previous negotiation's stipulations) as it would mean that Blizzard was unfairly targeting one corporation and would sink their entire protection of IP rights case due to the selectivism of it. Oh and i'm really not going to reply to anyone over this stuff as it just gives me headaches trying to deal with the starcraft equivalent of creationists and yes I realise how remarkably arrogant and superior that sounds. Well don't let the door hit you on your way out of the thread. | ||
leakingpear
United Kingdom302 Posts
On November 05 2010 00:23 snowdrift wrote: Well don't let the door hit you on your way out of the thread. I implore you or anyone to look at my post history in these threads and then not understand where i'm coming from. | ||
Xiphos
Canada7507 Posts
On November 05 2010 00:18 C.W. wrote: And Blizzard sure does the right thing - it's their damn property. €dit: This is ridiculous. No you are ridiculous. Basically ALL the games you play at the moment does NOT belong to you. It is still the game companies's properties. Would you really want that? Stop posting stuff that you have no clue about. | ||
C.W.
88 Posts
On November 05 2010 00:20 HeaDStrong wrote: All I was saying is that I am not fully convinced that by creating a video game you automatically own everything that is created by it. I don't think blizzard gets much credit for all the fangirls going crazy and shouting when Flash used a d-matrixed dropship as an elevator to load Jaedongs base full with MnM and take out his tech. Or do you think all the fans turned up to that even because how awesomely Blizzard had designed all those sprites. You see what I mean? What OGN/MBC/KeSPA are selling is not quite what Blizzard had produced. Sure Blizzard deserves a part of the cake, but from what I recall their requests in the negotiations wasn't a piece of the cake, it was the whole cake and also the knife and all the plates to serve it. In my view this is unreasonable from them and they are waaay in the wrong here. I agree that KeSPA is a nasty organization, but KeSPA is a representative organization of all the pro teams involved. If KeSPA loses, the core of esports is gone and I am sure as hell Blizzard will not replace it. What happens from then is rather unpredictable but certainly not for good. If you create something you are the IP holder. It's your property and is handled like any other property as well. And in case Blizzards wants the whole cake or just a part of it does not change anything. It's their right. StarCraft was successively selling even b4 the whole esports thing started - Kespa did not make the game successful - they just milked it to make good money for their own without respecting Blizzards rights. Legally this case is clear. | ||
| ||