EPTPublic Profile for snowdrift
General Profile:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
snowdrift's Public Profile:
the team i support
![[image loading]](http://www.teamliquid.net/staff/snowdrift/STX_logo.jpg)
oov>world
![[image loading]](http://www.teamliquid.net/staff/snowdrift/oov_the_world.jpg)
what korean children learn in school
![[image loading]](http://www.teamliquid.net/staff/snowdrift/how_to_do_the_terran.jpg)
oov>world
what korean children learn in school
the truth about sc2
On July 28 2010 18:37 tree.hugger wrote:
It's not the idea of Sc2 becoming big world-wide and in Korea that worries me, it's the idea that the mere presumption of Sc2's succession (these articles) will be enough to cripple what we already have, yet are no guarantee of future success.
Why couldn't (for example) Sc2 and BW have competitive scenes side-by-side? What about the current BW scene makes it so uninspiring that we're willing to ship it off, and what about the current Sc2 scene makes it so fantastic that we can already start talking about it's inherent ascension?
It's all a potemkin village, and instead of artificially saying things like "bid a fond farewell to BW" and risk making it so, we should be positive and realistic about Sc2's chances, and see what happens naturally. We're cutting down the house we've already build to clear land for a new house of uncertain size and quality. Where will we live if the second house collapses?
It's not the idea of Sc2 becoming big world-wide and in Korea that worries me, it's the idea that the mere presumption of Sc2's succession (these articles) will be enough to cripple what we already have, yet are no guarantee of future success.
Why couldn't (for example) Sc2 and BW have competitive scenes side-by-side? What about the current BW scene makes it so uninspiring that we're willing to ship it off, and what about the current Sc2 scene makes it so fantastic that we can already start talking about it's inherent ascension?
It's all a potemkin village, and instead of artificially saying things like "bid a fond farewell to BW" and risk making it so, we should be positive and realistic about Sc2's chances, and see what happens naturally. We're cutting down the house we've already build to clear land for a new house of uncertain size and quality. Where will we live if the second house collapses?
terran qq. Learn to nydus to raven you scrub
On October 09 2010 07:34 Losticus wrote:
Regardless of skill, that's exactly what he is. He's the same guy that trotted out that nonsense about winning 10% of his practice matches, in the midst of, and prior to, ROFL stomping top Terran after top Terran.
Just because he's an exceptional player with mechanics most of us will never have, doesn't mean his opinions are omnipotent. His comments on PvT are so off-base and untrue, it's hard to take anything he says seriously. And he wants more buffs?! Lmao.
He cried, you cried, you all cried -- and because of it you're getting what you want. Nevermind balance, reason, and FACTS (which don't support that Zerg is UP at all) -- all you've really wanted is your wittle-race-that-could to become the strongest in every facet of the game. And any harass, any inability to expand as your first building, any loss PERIOD -- said to you in your warped insect mind that the game HAS to be imbalanced. That somehow not being able to macro for 40 mins to ultralisks without ever being bothered by your opponent is unacceptable. That Blizzard MUST "fix their shit" or you'll leave "Terrancraft."
Well, I hope you enjoy the broken game you will soon create. Have fun justifying the 70% win rates against the ever-disappearing player pool of the game you destroyed.
Regardless of skill, that's exactly what he is. He's the same guy that trotted out that nonsense about winning 10% of his practice matches, in the midst of, and prior to, ROFL stomping top Terran after top Terran.
Just because he's an exceptional player with mechanics most of us will never have, doesn't mean his opinions are omnipotent. His comments on PvT are so off-base and untrue, it's hard to take anything he says seriously. And he wants more buffs?! Lmao.
He cried, you cried, you all cried -- and because of it you're getting what you want. Nevermind balance, reason, and FACTS (which don't support that Zerg is UP at all) -- all you've really wanted is your wittle-race-that-could to become the strongest in every facet of the game. And any harass, any inability to expand as your first building, any loss PERIOD -- said to you in your warped insect mind that the game HAS to be imbalanced. That somehow not being able to macro for 40 mins to ultralisks without ever being bothered by your opponent is unacceptable. That Blizzard MUST "fix their shit" or you'll leave "Terrancraft."
Well, I hope you enjoy the broken game you will soon create. Have fun justifying the 70% win rates against the ever-disappearing player pool of the game you destroyed.
