Arthur, Bomber advance from Group D of WCS AM Ro32 - Page 2
Forum Index > SC2 General |
Tipany
United States368 Posts
| ||
GreenMash
Norway1746 Posts
On February 27 2014 16:57 Tipany wrote: Just wondering, is there a reason why TL decided to start showing spoilers on the front page? I know that it's been like this for a while, but who thought that it would be a good idea and why? There is a hide spoilers box on the front page | ||
sixofsouls
Russian Federation3 Posts
| ||
Ragnarork
France9034 Posts
On February 27 2014 16:16 Seeker wrote: -__-;; Voted JD, Bomber. Am still amused Oh and I suppose the LR went down in flame the moment JD lost? EDIT: Stop whining. This lr is terrible. Apparently yes hahaha ! | ||
KivTM
Australia90 Posts
On February 27 2014 16:57 AxiomBlurr wrote: JD deserved the loss...he has not the been the 'Killer' he was a few months back...full to credit to Arthur and Bomber....and Has did play well too! he deserved this loss because he hasn't been as beastly as he was a few months back? lolwut? | ||
Ragnarork
France9034 Posts
| ||
Furikawari
France2522 Posts
| ||
GreyMorph
4 Posts
| ||
looken
727 Posts
| ||
NeThZOR
South Africa7387 Posts
| ||
AaronChance
29 Posts
| ||
elwood.sc2
Germany35 Posts
On February 27 2014 17:40 Furikawari wrote: Just get rid of all protoss al in possibilites. As a zerg I dream to have only half of them (well, not really, I hate this kind of play, but still). On February 27 2014 18:08 AaronChance wrote: Has really should have won both his games against Bomber. His plans should have been deadly, but his all thumbs micro lost him the matches. If a more experienced protoss had been in his place, Bomber wouldn't have stood a chance. Why shut down all all-in-possibilities? As you can easily see an all-in is not a free win. If the terran or zerg opponent is strong enough the attack can be repelled. | ||
nimdil
Poland3746 Posts
| ||
Rhaeide
Spain304 Posts
| ||
Furikawari
France2522 Posts
On February 27 2014 18:23 elwood.sc2 wrote: Why shut down all all-in-possibilities? As you can easily see an all-in is not a free win. If the terran or zerg opponent is strong enough the attack can be repelled. Give other races the same possibilities then. It was no near good play, just random cheese that if you want to prevent each games, you'll get behind. Like protoss has difficulties once they are ahead. Two things are boring: only one race can afford this kind of "play" and it's really not interesting to watch game like this. If I want to see good gambling I watch poker. | ||
Prince_Stranger
Kazakhstan762 Posts
| ||
Ragnarork
France9034 Posts
On February 27 2014 18:30 Furikawari wrote: Give other races the same possibilities then. It was no near good play, just random cheese that if you want to prevent each games, you'll get behind. Like protoss has difficulties once they are ahead. Two things are boring: only one race can afford this kind of "play" and it's really not interesting to watch game like this. If I want to see good gambling I watch poker. The all-in opportunities difference between races is ok. God dammit stop trying to make every races look the same in a by-design asymmetrical game. The only point of concern people could have with protoss is that many dangerous opener looks the same yet require very different reactions from the other player (hell, even in the PvP match-up), like say a PvT blink opener vs a fast zealot archon timing (well, for the sake of an example, I don't really know if fast zealot archon timing is even a thing, I just lose to it on the ladder ) | ||
calippo
Sweden2525 Posts
| ||
danmanjones
New Zealand19 Posts
| ||
Piwit
France1 Post
| ||
| ||