• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 16:23
CET 21:23
KST 05:23
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL21] Ro24 Preview Pt1: New Chaos0Team Liquid Map Contest #22 - Presented by Monster Energy7ByuL: The Forgotten Master of ZvT30Behind the Blue - Team Liquid History Book19Clem wins HomeStory Cup 289
Community News
Weekly Cups (March 16-22): herO doubles, Cure surprises3Blizzard Classic Cup @ BlizzCon 2026 - $100k prize pool48Weekly Cups (March 9-15): herO, Clem, ByuN win42026 KungFu Cup Announcement6BGE Stara Zagora 2026 cancelled12
StarCraft 2
General
Potential Updates Coming to the SC2 CN Server What mix of new & old maps do you want in the next ladder pool? (SC2) Blizzard Classic Cup @ BlizzCon 2026 - $100k prize pool Weekly Cups (March 16-22): herO doubles, Cure surprises Weekly Cups (August 25-31): Clem's Last Straw?
Tourneys
WardiTV Mondays Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament World University TeamLeague (500$+) | Signups Open RSL Season 4 announced for March-April WardiTV Team League Season 10
Strategy
Custom Maps
[M] (2) Frigid Storage Publishing has been re-enabled! [Feb 24th 2026]
External Content
The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 518 Radiation Zone Mutation # 517 Distant Threat Mutation # 516 Specter of Death
Brood War
General
Gypsy to Korea BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Soulkey's decision to leave C9 How much money terran looses from gas steal? mca64Launcher - New Version with StarCraft: Remast
Tourneys
[ASL21] Ro24 Group C [Megathread] Daily Proleagues [ASL21] Ro24 Group B 2026 Changsha Offline Cup
Strategy
What's the deal with APM & what's its true value Fighting Spirit mining rates Simple Questions, Simple Answers Soma's 9 hatch build from ASL Game 2
Other Games
General Games
Darkest Dungeon Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread General RTS Discussion Thread Path of Exile
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion The Story of Wings Gaming
League of Legends
G2 just beat GenG in First stand
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Five o'clock TL Mafia Mafia Game Mode Feedback/Ideas Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Canadian Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine
Fan Clubs
The IdrA Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
[Req][Books] Good Fantasy/SciFi books Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece
Sports
Cricket [SPORT] 2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion Tokyo Olympics 2021 Thread General nutrition recommendations
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Laptop capable of using Photoshop Lightroom?
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Funny Nicknames
LUCKY_NOOB
Money Laundering In Video Ga…
TrAiDoS
Iranian anarchists: organize…
XenOsky
FS++
Kraekkling
Shocked by a laser…
Spydermine0240
Unintentional protectionism…
Uldridge
ASL S21 English Commentary…
namkraft
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1605 users

Ukraine on Gay Propaganda - Page 2

Forum Index > General Forum
Post a Reply
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 8 9 10 Next All
AngryMag
Profile Joined November 2011
Germany1040 Posts
October 11 2012 19:07 GMT
#21
total bullshit bill... If the ukrainian people would have a say in that, I wouldn't care, as they can do what they want in their country. If a representative government thinks it is a pressing issue to decide whether there will be gay parades in the future or not, well, I would call it basically useless. Trying to regulate sexual orientations of the population, how ridicilous
Klondikebar
Profile Joined October 2011
United States2227 Posts
October 11 2012 19:08 GMT
#22
On October 12 2012 04:03 FabledIntegral wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 12 2012 03:49 Klondikebar wrote:
"He elaborates that the free speech of the gay minorities is a violation of other people's right to not to have to hear something offensive."

This is patently silly. Are gay people's rights violated because they have to hear the offensive line "being gay is a sin?" This really just harkens back to John Stewart when he said "you are confusing a war on religion with simply not getting your way anymore."

What sort of free speech positions does the Ukraine take? Are they as strong as they are in the US?

Edit: I also didn't realize their HIV rate was so high. If people are still stuck on the myth that homosexuality spreads HIV faster than heterosexuality then that could be the reason it's gaining such support.


The myth is rather tha HIV is much more common in homosexuals, particularly males, which is very true. That's not a myth when you look at percents. Homosexual males don't need to use a condom as a form of birth control and at the same time anal sex is significantly more likely to contract HIV due to the increased probability of minor cuts being exposed. Just like a heterosexual couple partaking in anal sex is more likely to contract HIV if one of the partners has HIV/AIDS than if they just had vaginal sex.


I am skeptical of those statistics (although I won't argue with them too hard). Homosexual men are also much more educated about HIV and are therefore more likely to be regularly tested and diagnosed. Heterosexuals are less educated and less likely to be diagnosed. The sample is very likely biased.

You are very correct that anal sex is more likely to transmit HIV though.

HIV is probably ACTUALLY more common in homosexual men in the developed world but not to the extent that they should be treated differently (aka banned from donating blood).
#2throwed
armada[sb]
Profile Joined August 2011
United States432 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-10-11 19:09:45
October 11 2012 19:08 GMT
#23
On October 12 2012 03:55 Wrath 2.1 wrote:
that's good. Sex life should be something private and not something that needs advertising or parades.


That's good? How in the hell is that good? Gay pride parades being cancelled because of threats of violence, people not being able to show affection to their loved one because of fear of persecution/prosecution, outlawing of homosexuality in media? Explain to me where in this there is any good? I'll be waiting.

Sex life may not need advertising or parades, but equality sure as shit does.
#Hitpoint @ GameSurge (IDLE=BAN)
heliusx
Profile Blog Joined May 2012
United States2306 Posts
October 11 2012 19:10 GMT
#24
On October 12 2012 04:07 Euronyme wrote:
LOL tolerant society decriminalizing homosexuality 1991?
It's only been legal here since 1934...


That was my exact thoughts at first, but they didn't get independence from the soviets until that year so that's actually not that bad pretty fast.
dude bro.
Djabanete
Profile Blog Joined May 2008
United States2786 Posts
October 11 2012 19:12 GMT
#25
The bill aims to outlaw any "positive depiction" of gay people, including joining in gay parade marches, same-sex displays of affection (kissing, holding hands), and even watching "gay films" like Brokeback Mountain.

On October 12 2012 03:55 Wrath 2.1 wrote:
that's good. Sex life should be something private and not something that needs advertising or parades.

So you agree that the bill should be extended to outlawing positive depictions of straight people, kissing and holding hands between straight people in public, and watching "straight films" like Bridget Jones' Diary?

Or no, wait, this is still about homophobia and nothing to do with privacy.
May the BeSt man win.
blinken
Profile Joined October 2010
Canada368 Posts
October 11 2012 19:15 GMT
#26
I can never understand these actions.

Do these people believe that one day everyone is going to turn homosexual? They must themselves find the same sex attractive if they are even considering this; they must ban it before they let their gay feelings overwhelm them! Hetero's shouldn't be thinking about homosexuality at all unless they are struggling with their own closet feelings.

Why can't people just stay the hell out of other people's lives? First rule of earth should be don't fucking tell anyone what to do unless it directly impacts your life in a harmful way.
FabledIntegral
Profile Blog Joined November 2008
United States9232 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-10-11 19:24:11
October 11 2012 19:16 GMT
#27
On October 12 2012 04:08 Klondikebar wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 12 2012 04:03 FabledIntegral wrote:
On October 12 2012 03:49 Klondikebar wrote:
"He elaborates that the free speech of the gay minorities is a violation of other people's right to not to have to hear something offensive."

This is patently silly. Are gay people's rights violated because they have to hear the offensive line "being gay is a sin?" This really just harkens back to John Stewart when he said "you are confusing a war on religion with simply not getting your way anymore."

What sort of free speech positions does the Ukraine take? Are they as strong as they are in the US?

Edit: I also didn't realize their HIV rate was so high. If people are still stuck on the myth that homosexuality spreads HIV faster than heterosexuality then that could be the reason it's gaining such support.


The myth is rather tha HIV is much more common in homosexuals, particularly males, which is very true. That's not a myth when you look at percents. Homosexual males don't need to use a condom as a form of birth control and at the same time anal sex is significantly more likely to contract HIV due to the increased probability of minor cuts being exposed. Just like a heterosexual couple partaking in anal sex is more likely to contract HIV if one of the partners has HIV/AIDS than if they just had vaginal sex.


I am skeptical of those statistics (although I won't argue with them too hard). Homosexual men are also much more educated about HIV and are therefore more likely to be regularly tested and diagnosed. Heterosexuals are less educated and less likely to be diagnosed. The sample is very likely biased.

You are very correct that anal sex is more likely to transmit HIV though.

HIV is probably ACTUALLY more common in homosexual men in the developed world but not to the extent that they should be treated differently (aka banned from donating blood).


Uhh.... there isn't just one study. There's a ton. It's usually estimated that while homosexual men make up <8% of the male population, they generally consist of near 50% of the males infected with HIV. I know 4 different people with HIV/AIDS, unfortunately all are homosexual and all have their bachelors . Homosexuality spreads it significantly more faster given their population representation.

1/5 males estimated to have it? That's a definite high enough rate to at least double check the blood.

WASHINGTON, D.C., August 18, 2011 (LifeSiteNews.com) - The U.S. Centers for Disease Control has estimated that practicing homosexual men account for 61% of the new HIV infections in the United States while they only amount to about 2% of the country’s population.

Earlier this month, the CDC released estimates for HIV infections from 2006-2009 showing that new infections remained stable at around 50,000 for each of the four years.

Homosexual men (men who have sex with men) accounted for 29,300 of the estimated 48,100 new infections in 2009, and homosexual men aged 13 to 29 accounted for 27% of the new cases.


http://www.lifesitenews.com/news/cdc-homosexual-men-account-for-61-of-new-hiv-infections-but-only-2-of-popul/

In 2005, over half of new HIV infections diagnosed in the US were among gay men, and up to one in five gay men living in cities is thought to be HIV positive. Yet two large population surveys showed that most gay men had similar numbers of unprotected sexual partners per year as straight men and women.


http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/09/070913132930.htm


National HIV/AIDS Statistics
By the end of 2007, cumulative AIDS diagnoses reached an estimated 1,051,875 including 37,041 in 2007.HIV transmission patterns have shifted over time. Most new HIV infections are among gay and bisexual men (53% in 2006), a smaller share than earlier in the epidemic but the only group for which new infections are on the rise. Heterosexual transmission has accounted for a growing share of new HIV infections over time, representing 31% in 2006, although they have been on the decline in recent years. New infections due to injection drug use have declined significantly over time – by approximately 80% – and accounted for 12% of new infections in 2006.


http://www.caresclinic.org/hiv/aids/national-hivaids-statistics.html
tMomiji
Profile Blog Joined July 2011
United States1115 Posts
October 11 2012 19:19 GMT
#28
On October 12 2012 04:08 armada[sb] wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 12 2012 03:55 Wrath 2.1 wrote:
that's good. Sex life should be something private and not something that needs advertising or parades.


That's good? How in the hell is that good? Gay pride parades being cancelled because of threats of violence, people not being able to show affection to their loved one because of fear of persecution/prosecution, outlawing of homosexuality in media? Explain to me where in this there is any good? I'll be waiting.

Sex life may not need advertising or parades, but equality sure as shit does.


The problem is the misconception that all gays are like the annoying vocal minority that wants to shove their sexuality in your face and be seen as "special" for it. That minority is ruining it for the rest, the way I see it, which is awful...
"I wonder if there is a league below copper? If so, I would like to inhabit it." -TotalBiscuit "In the event of a sudden change in cabin pressure, ROOF FLIES OFF!" -George Carlin <3 HerO <3 Kiwikaki <3 MKP
Merix
Profile Joined November 2011
Ukraine28 Posts
October 11 2012 19:19 GMT
#29
With ongoing parliaments election campaign in Ukraine you can't take any of this news too seriously, really... too much speculations, mass manipulations, propaganda etc. in fight for votes. Hopefully with end of elections everything will fall into place.
Klondikebar
Profile Joined October 2011
United States2227 Posts
October 11 2012 19:20 GMT
#30
On October 12 2012 04:16 FabledIntegral wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 12 2012 04:08 Klondikebar wrote:
On October 12 2012 04:03 FabledIntegral wrote:
On October 12 2012 03:49 Klondikebar wrote:
"He elaborates that the free speech of the gay minorities is a violation of other people's right to not to have to hear something offensive."

This is patently silly. Are gay people's rights violated because they have to hear the offensive line "being gay is a sin?" This really just harkens back to John Stewart when he said "you are confusing a war on religion with simply not getting your way anymore."

What sort of free speech positions does the Ukraine take? Are they as strong as they are in the US?

Edit: I also didn't realize their HIV rate was so high. If people are still stuck on the myth that homosexuality spreads HIV faster than heterosexuality then that could be the reason it's gaining such support.


The myth is rather tha HIV is much more common in homosexuals, particularly males, which is very true. That's not a myth when you look at percents. Homosexual males don't need to use a condom as a form of birth control and at the same time anal sex is significantly more likely to contract HIV due to the increased probability of minor cuts being exposed. Just like a heterosexual couple partaking in anal sex is more likely to contract HIV if one of the partners has HIV/AIDS than if they just had vaginal sex.


I am skeptical of those statistics (although I won't argue with them too hard). Homosexual men are also much more educated about HIV and are therefore more likely to be regularly tested and diagnosed. Heterosexuals are less educated and less likely to be diagnosed. The sample is very likely biased.

You are very correct that anal sex is more likely to transmit HIV though.

HIV is probably ACTUALLY more common in homosexual men in the developed world but not to the extent that they should be treated differently (aka banned from donating blood).


Uhh.... there isn't just one study. There's a ton. It's usually estimated that while homosexual men make up <8% of the male population, they generally consist of near 50% of the males infected with HIV. I know 4 different people with HIV/AIDS, unfortunately all are homosexual and all have their bachelors .

Show nested quote +
WASHINGTON, D.C., August 18, 2011 (LifeSiteNews.com) - The U.S. Centers for Disease Control has estimated that practicing homosexual men account for 61% of the new HIV infections in the United States while they only amount to about 2% of the country’s population.

Earlier this month, the CDC released estimates for HIV infections from 2006-2009 showing that new infections remained stable at around 50,000 for each of the four years.

Homosexual men (men who have sex with men) accounted for 29,300 of the estimated 48,100 new infections in 2009, and homosexual men aged 13 to 29 accounted for 27% of the new cases.


http://www.lifesitenews.com/news/cdc-homosexual-men-account-for-61-of-new-hiv-infections-but-only-2-of-popul/

Show nested quote +
In 2005, over half of new HIV infections diagnosed in the US were among gay men, and up to one in five gay men living in cities is thought to be HIV positive. Yet two large population surveys showed that most gay men had similar numbers of unprotected sexual partners per year as straight men and women.


http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/09/070913132930.htm

Show nested quote +

National HIV/AIDS Statistics
By the end of 2007, cumulative AIDS diagnoses reached an estimated 1,051,875 including 37,041 in 2007.HIV transmission patterns have shifted over time. Most new HIV infections are among gay and bisexual men (53% in 2006), a smaller share than earlier in the epidemic but the only group for which new infections are on the rise. Heterosexual transmission has accounted for a growing share of new HIV infections over time, representing 31% in 2006, although they have been on the decline in recent years. New infections due to injection drug use have declined significantly over time – by approximately 80% – and accounted for 12% of new infections in 2006.


http://www.caresclinic.org/hiv/aids/national-hivaids-statistics.html


Jeebus. The last guy who debated this with me only had one iffy study. I stand corrected.
#2throwed
FabledIntegral
Profile Blog Joined November 2008
United States9232 Posts
October 11 2012 19:22 GMT
#31
On October 12 2012 04:20 Klondikebar wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 12 2012 04:16 FabledIntegral wrote:
On October 12 2012 04:08 Klondikebar wrote:
On October 12 2012 04:03 FabledIntegral wrote:
On October 12 2012 03:49 Klondikebar wrote:
"He elaborates that the free speech of the gay minorities is a violation of other people's right to not to have to hear something offensive."

This is patently silly. Are gay people's rights violated because they have to hear the offensive line "being gay is a sin?" This really just harkens back to John Stewart when he said "you are confusing a war on religion with simply not getting your way anymore."

What sort of free speech positions does the Ukraine take? Are they as strong as they are in the US?

Edit: I also didn't realize their HIV rate was so high. If people are still stuck on the myth that homosexuality spreads HIV faster than heterosexuality then that could be the reason it's gaining such support.


The myth is rather tha HIV is much more common in homosexuals, particularly males, which is very true. That's not a myth when you look at percents. Homosexual males don't need to use a condom as a form of birth control and at the same time anal sex is significantly more likely to contract HIV due to the increased probability of minor cuts being exposed. Just like a heterosexual couple partaking in anal sex is more likely to contract HIV if one of the partners has HIV/AIDS than if they just had vaginal sex.


I am skeptical of those statistics (although I won't argue with them too hard). Homosexual men are also much more educated about HIV and are therefore more likely to be regularly tested and diagnosed. Heterosexuals are less educated and less likely to be diagnosed. The sample is very likely biased.

You are very correct that anal sex is more likely to transmit HIV though.

HIV is probably ACTUALLY more common in homosexual men in the developed world but not to the extent that they should be treated differently (aka banned from donating blood).


Uhh.... there isn't just one study. There's a ton. It's usually estimated that while homosexual men make up <8% of the male population, they generally consist of near 50% of the males infected with HIV. I know 4 different people with HIV/AIDS, unfortunately all are homosexual and all have their bachelors .

WASHINGTON, D.C., August 18, 2011 (LifeSiteNews.com) - The U.S. Centers for Disease Control has estimated that practicing homosexual men account for 61% of the new HIV infections in the United States while they only amount to about 2% of the country’s population.

Earlier this month, the CDC released estimates for HIV infections from 2006-2009 showing that new infections remained stable at around 50,000 for each of the four years.

Homosexual men (men who have sex with men) accounted for 29,300 of the estimated 48,100 new infections in 2009, and homosexual men aged 13 to 29 accounted for 27% of the new cases.


http://www.lifesitenews.com/news/cdc-homosexual-men-account-for-61-of-new-hiv-infections-but-only-2-of-popul/

In 2005, over half of new HIV infections diagnosed in the US were among gay men, and up to one in five gay men living in cities is thought to be HIV positive. Yet two large population surveys showed that most gay men had similar numbers of unprotected sexual partners per year as straight men and women.


http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/09/070913132930.htm


National HIV/AIDS Statistics
By the end of 2007, cumulative AIDS diagnoses reached an estimated 1,051,875 including 37,041 in 2007.HIV transmission patterns have shifted over time. Most new HIV infections are among gay and bisexual men (53% in 2006), a smaller share than earlier in the epidemic but the only group for which new infections are on the rise. Heterosexual transmission has accounted for a growing share of new HIV infections over time, representing 31% in 2006, although they have been on the decline in recent years. New infections due to injection drug use have declined significantly over time – by approximately 80% – and accounted for 12% of new infections in 2006.


http://www.caresclinic.org/hiv/aids/national-hivaids-statistics.html


Jeebus. The last guy who debated this with me only had one iffy study. I stand corrected.



No worries. I'm corrected in Gen Discussion more than 90% of the people I'd guess.
Vo-one
Profile Joined June 2003
Ukraine456 Posts
October 11 2012 19:22 GMT
#32
Don't bet to much on this parliament, guys. They just want to lool like nice to the world but they're doing a lot of shit inside the country. They want to do things in european way, but the most part of ukrainians won't change their minds that way.
This parliament and this president look like a joke, but it's not funny at all in here.
DarkPlasmaBall
Profile Blog Joined March 2010
United States45382 Posts
October 11 2012 19:24 GMT
#33
"No positive depiction of gay people", according to the article... holy crap, so much for saying homosexuality is the problem- it's apparently the fact that gay people are just bad people. lol wow. That's just plain insensitive and ignorant -.-'

What's the main driving force for such hostility against homosexuality in the Ukraine? Is it a strongly religious or conservative country or something? Did they recently get taken over by a country with a gay leader? What's their deal?

And with all this HIV talk... Showing a statistic that non-straight couples are more likely to spread HIV, you'd have a huge slippery slope on your hands there, considering it's surely the case that a specific race or other groups are people are more likely to spread HIV as well (clearly, far more Africans spread it than non-Africans: http://www.avert.org/worlstatinfo.htm should Africans not be allowed to marry or even have relationships?). Also, isn't the spread of HIV much more prevalent in dirty needles and lack of contraception use and lack of STD check-ups, rather than "oh my gosh you're gay, therefore you're more likely to spread HIV"?

TL;DR- White-Ra needs to teach his country that two men performing special tactics on one another is not an abomination.
"There is nothing more satisfying than looking at a crowd of people and helping them get what I love." ~Day[9] Daily #100
armada[sb]
Profile Joined August 2011
United States432 Posts
October 11 2012 19:25 GMT
#34
On October 12 2012 04:19 tMomiji wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 12 2012 04:08 armada[sb] wrote:
On October 12 2012 03:55 Wrath 2.1 wrote:
that's good. Sex life should be something private and not something that needs advertising or parades.


That's good? How in the hell is that good? Gay pride parades being cancelled because of threats of violence, people not being able to show affection to their loved one because of fear of persecution/prosecution, outlawing of homosexuality in media? Explain to me where in this there is any good? I'll be waiting.

Sex life may not need advertising or parades, but equality sure as shit does.


The problem is the misconception that all gays are like the annoying vocal minority that wants to shove their sexuality in your face and be seen as "special" for it. That minority is ruining it for the rest, the way I see it, which is awful...


I'm not sure that it has as much to do with that as it has to do with bigotry, I'm sorry. People have every right to want the freedom to express themselves, and if they do that by expressing their sexuality, then so be it. It's not like homosexuals are going door to door trying to convert people. And what's the problem with them wanting to be seen as special?
#Hitpoint @ GameSurge (IDLE=BAN)
docvoc
Profile Blog Joined July 2011
United States5491 Posts
October 11 2012 19:30 GMT
#35
What constitutes propaganda in Ukraine....
User was warned for too many mimes.
tMomiji
Profile Blog Joined July 2011
United States1115 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-10-11 19:35:34
October 11 2012 19:31 GMT
#36
On October 12 2012 04:25 armada[sb] wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 12 2012 04:19 tMomiji wrote:
On October 12 2012 04:08 armada[sb] wrote:
On October 12 2012 03:55 Wrath 2.1 wrote:
that's good. Sex life should be something private and not something that needs advertising or parades.


That's good? How in the hell is that good? Gay pride parades being cancelled because of threats of violence, people not being able to show affection to their loved one because of fear of persecution/prosecution, outlawing of homosexuality in media? Explain to me where in this there is any good? I'll be waiting.

Sex life may not need advertising or parades, but equality sure as shit does.


The problem is the misconception that all gays are like the annoying vocal minority that wants to shove their sexuality in your face and be seen as "special" for it. That minority is ruining it for the rest, the way I see it, which is awful...


I'm not sure that it has as much to do with that as it has to do with bigotry, I'm sorry. People have every right to want the freedom to express themselves, and if they do that by expressing their sexuality, then so be it. It's not like homosexuals are going door to door trying to convert people. And what's the problem with them wanting to be seen as special?


Well my point is more that it won't stop it from annoying some people, and these are the VOCAL minority. A lot of people think they speak for the entire group, but they don't.

I think we disagree on the other point though. I see sex as something special that you keep to yourself; something that lets you bond with someone you trust and who is important to you. It's nobody's business what happens in your sex life; nobody's but your own.

The problem with being seen as special for it is that it can (it won't always) lead to feelings of superiority. I don't think gays should get special treatment or attention or privileges at all...just treat them like anyone else.

TLDR - "I only care about someone's sexuality when I'm trying to have sex with that person!"

Edit: What you said about how gays don't go door to door trying to convert people reminded me of this... (Warning: Language.)
"I wonder if there is a league below copper? If so, I would like to inhabit it." -TotalBiscuit "In the event of a sudden change in cabin pressure, ROOF FLIES OFF!" -George Carlin <3 HerO <3 Kiwikaki <3 MKP
Archas
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
United States6531 Posts
October 11 2012 19:32 GMT
#37
On October 12 2012 04:24 DarkPlasmaBall wrote:
TL;DR- White-Ra needs to teach his country that two men performing special tactics on one another is not an abomination.

Unfortunately, in order to do that, he first needs to fight his way through an army of Zealots.
The room is ripe with the stench of bitches!
Klondikebar
Profile Joined October 2011
United States2227 Posts
October 11 2012 19:35 GMT
#38
On October 12 2012 04:31 tMomiji wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 12 2012 04:25 armada[sb] wrote:
On October 12 2012 04:19 tMomiji wrote:
On October 12 2012 04:08 armada[sb] wrote:
On October 12 2012 03:55 Wrath 2.1 wrote:
that's good. Sex life should be something private and not something that needs advertising or parades.


That's good? How in the hell is that good? Gay pride parades being cancelled because of threats of violence, people not being able to show affection to their loved one because of fear of persecution/prosecution, outlawing of homosexuality in media? Explain to me where in this there is any good? I'll be waiting.

Sex life may not need advertising or parades, but equality sure as shit does.


The problem is the misconception that all gays are like the annoying vocal minority that wants to shove their sexuality in your face and be seen as "special" for it. That minority is ruining it for the rest, the way I see it, which is awful...


I'm not sure that it has as much to do with that as it has to do with bigotry, I'm sorry. People have every right to want the freedom to express themselves, and if they do that by expressing their sexuality, then so be it. It's not like homosexuals are going door to door trying to convert people. And what's the problem with them wanting to be seen as special?


Well my point is more that it won't stop it from annoying some people, and these are the VOCAL minority. A lot of people think they speak for the entire group, but they don't.

I think we disagree on the other point though. I see sex as something special that you keep to yourself; something that lets you bond with someone you trust and who is important to you. It's nobody's business what happens in your sex life; nobody's but your own.

The problem with being seen as special for it is that it can (it won't always) lead to feelings of superiority. I don't think gays should get special treatment or attention or privileges at all...just treat them like anyone else.

TLDR - "I only care about someone's sexuality when I'm trying to have sex with that person!"


If you think sexuality should be private then surely you support a ban on all positive portrayals of heterosexual couples as well. I mean, ALL sex should be private right?
#2throwed
Derez
Profile Blog Joined January 2011
Netherlands6068 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-10-11 19:37:18
October 11 2012 19:36 GMT
#39
On October 12 2012 04:16 FabledIntegral wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 12 2012 04:08 Klondikebar wrote:
On October 12 2012 04:03 FabledIntegral wrote:
On October 12 2012 03:49 Klondikebar wrote:
"He elaborates that the free speech of the gay minorities is a violation of other people's right to not to have to hear something offensive."

This is patently silly. Are gay people's rights violated because they have to hear the offensive line "being gay is a sin?" This really just harkens back to John Stewart when he said "you are confusing a war on religion with simply not getting your way anymore."

What sort of free speech positions does the Ukraine take? Are they as strong as they are in the US?

Edit: I also didn't realize their HIV rate was so high. If people are still stuck on the myth that homosexuality spreads HIV faster than heterosexuality then that could be the reason it's gaining such support.


The myth is rather tha HIV is much more common in homosexuals, particularly males, which is very true. That's not a myth when you look at percents. Homosexual males don't need to use a condom as a form of birth control and at the same time anal sex is significantly more likely to contract HIV due to the increased probability of minor cuts being exposed. Just like a heterosexual couple partaking in anal sex is more likely to contract HIV if one of the partners has HIV/AIDS than if they just had vaginal sex.


I am skeptical of those statistics (although I won't argue with them too hard). Homosexual men are also much more educated about HIV and are therefore more likely to be regularly tested and diagnosed. Heterosexuals are less educated and less likely to be diagnosed. The sample is very likely biased.

You are very correct that anal sex is more likely to transmit HIV though.

HIV is probably ACTUALLY more common in homosexual men in the developed world but not to the extent that they should be treated differently (aka banned from donating blood).


Uhh.... there isn't just one study. There's a ton. It's usually estimated that while homosexual men make up <8% of the male population, they generally consist of near 50% of the males infected with HIV. I know 4 different people with HIV/AIDS, unfortunately all are homosexual and all have their bachelors . Homosexuality spreads it significantly more faster given their population representation.

1/5 males estimated to have it? That's a definite high enough rate to at least double check the blood.

Show nested quote +
WASHINGTON, D.C., August 18, 2011 (LifeSiteNews.com) - The U.S. Centers for Disease Control has estimated that practicing homosexual men account for 61% of the new HIV infections in the United States while they only amount to about 2% of the country’s population.

Earlier this month, the CDC released estimates for HIV infections from 2006-2009 showing that new infections remained stable at around 50,000 for each of the four years.

Homosexual men (men who have sex with men) accounted for 29,300 of the estimated 48,100 new infections in 2009, and homosexual men aged 13 to 29 accounted for 27% of the new cases.


http://www.lifesitenews.com/news/cdc-homosexual-men-account-for-61-of-new-hiv-infections-but-only-2-of-popul/

Show nested quote +
In 2005, over half of new HIV infections diagnosed in the US were among gay men, and up to one in five gay men living in cities is thought to be HIV positive. Yet two large population surveys showed that most gay men had similar numbers of unprotected sexual partners per year as straight men and women.


http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/09/070913132930.htm

Show nested quote +

National HIV/AIDS Statistics
By the end of 2007, cumulative AIDS diagnoses reached an estimated 1,051,875 including 37,041 in 2007.HIV transmission patterns have shifted over time. Most new HIV infections are among gay and bisexual men (53% in 2006), a smaller share than earlier in the epidemic but the only group for which new infections are on the rise. Heterosexual transmission has accounted for a growing share of new HIV infections over time, representing 31% in 2006, although they have been on the decline in recent years. New infections due to injection drug use have declined significantly over time – by approximately 80% – and accounted for 12% of new infections in 2006.


http://www.caresclinic.org/hiv/aids/national-hivaids-statistics.html

Those statistics only hold up in the US/Western Europe tho, where HIV/AIDS has never really spread beyond homosexuals and IV drug users. As an example, take any African country and the situation becomes entirely different when it spreads to the general population instead of specific subgroups that don't interact with the groups that are at risk.

If I recall correctly from what I read in newspapers, in the Ukraine the epidemic is largely due to a combination high levels of prostitution and large amounts of IV drug use by prostitutes, in which case it seems likely that most of the spread happens through heterosexual sex.

Looking up a quote on wikipedia quickly:
The transmission of HIV among homosexuals and bisexuals does not play as great a role in Ukraine as it does in Western Europe or North America. From 1987 to 2007, 157 cases have been officially recorded, one third of them in 2007 (48 new infections). Indeed it can be assumed that along with the increase in sexual transmission in general, the number of infections among homosexuals is rising as well.


By which I don't mean you're wrong or anything, just that different circumstances in different countries create different effects.
Grumbels
Profile Blog Joined May 2009
Netherlands7031 Posts
October 11 2012 19:37 GMT
#40
On October 12 2012 03:44 journaIist wrote:
After a rousing service in the church's warehouse-like auditorium focusing on the agonies of sin and bliss of salvation, I meet the chief pastor, Valery Reshetinsky. For him, the fight against homosexuality is a matter of "national security" upon which the survival of the nation depends.

"Here's the issue," says Pastor Reshetinsky, a large-boned man with a slight moustache, tells me. "In a real democracy, my freedom and rights are limited by the freedom of someone else."

In his opinion, freedom of speech for sexual minorities is a violation of what he considers his inalienable right not to have to hear something he finds offensive.

"You can't do everything that you want to do, because there are people who have the exact same rights as you do," he insists.

The pastor goes on to accuse a worldwide conspiracy of Masons, New-Agers, postmodernists and financiers of various nationalities, of imposing ideas that are not "characteristic for Ukraine" on the nation's children.

How about the freedom of Ukrainians to not to have to be subjected to terribly offensive ideas like his?

This brings to mind a mini documentary I watched during EURO2012 where they showed some of the political situation in Ukraine. It seems quite bleak to me, with corruption and lack of a future and such, so I can't really imagine people being dumb enough to fall for such divisive language, but I don't know. I guess every time on TL when there is gay bashing it is from Eastern Europeans, so maybe it actually has majority support there. *shudder*
Well, now I tell you, I never seen good come o' goodness yet. Him as strikes first is my fancy; dead men don't bite; them's my views--amen, so be it.
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 8 9 10 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
OSC
18:00
OSC Elite Rising Star #18
SteadfastSC144
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
mouzHeroMarine 364
LamboSC2 227
SteadfastSC 144
UpATreeSC 119
MindelVK 29
ProTech1
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 12878
Calm 2625
ggaemo 64
Backho 53
soO 20
Super Smash Bros
C9.Mang0116
Other Games
summit1g6476
tarik_tv3620
Grubby2537
Beastyqt673
mouzStarbuck454
ArmadaUGS90
shahzam60
Trikslyr54
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick2177
BasetradeTV125
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 20 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Kozan
• sooper7s
• Migwel
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• IndyKCrew
• intothetv
StarCraft: Brood War
• RayReign 21
• 80smullet 15
• ZZZeroYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• C_a_k_e 1712
• WagamamaTV775
• lizZardDota258
League of Legends
• Nemesis3534
• TFBlade876
Other Games
• Scarra1050
• imaqtpie801
• Shiphtur140
Upcoming Events
Replay Cast
3h 37m
WardiTV Team League
15h 37m
Big Brain Bouts
20h 37m
Fjant vs SortOf
YoungYakov vs Krystianer
Reynor vs HeRoMaRinE
RSL Revival
1d 13h
Cure vs Zoun
herO vs Rogue
WardiTV Team League
1d 15h
Platinum Heroes Events
1d 18h
BSL
1d 23h
RSL Revival
2 days
ByuN vs Maru
MaxPax vs TriGGeR
WardiTV Team League
2 days
BSL
2 days
[ Show More ]
Replay Cast
3 days
Replay Cast
3 days
Afreeca Starleague
3 days
Light vs Calm
Royal vs Mind
Wardi Open
3 days
Monday Night Weeklies
3 days
OSC
4 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
4 days
Afreeca Starleague
4 days
Rush vs PianO
Flash vs Speed
Replay Cast
5 days
Afreeca Starleague
5 days
BeSt vs Leta
Queen vs Jaedong
Replay Cast
6 days
The PondCast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2026-03-25
WardiTV Winter 2026
Underdog Cup #3

Ongoing

KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 1
BSL Season 22
CSL Elite League 2026
CSL Season 20: Qualifier 1
ASL Season 21
Acropolis #4 - TS6
RSL Revival: Season 4
Nations Cup 2026
NationLESS Cup
BLAST Open Spring 2026
ESL Pro League S23 Finals
ESL Pro League S23 Stage 1&2
PGL Cluj-Napoca 2026
IEM Kraków 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter Qual

Upcoming

2026 Changsha Offline CUP
CSL Season 20: Qualifier 2
CSL 2026 SPRING (S20)
Acropolis #4
IPSL Spring 2026
BSL 22 Non-Korean Championship
CSLAN 4
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
HSC XXIX
uThermal 2v2 2026 Main Event
IEM Cologne Major 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 2
CS Asia Championships 2026
IEM Atlanta 2026
Asian Champions League 2026
PGL Astana 2026
BLAST Rivals Spring 2026
CCT Season 3 Global Finals
IEM Rio 2026
PGL Bucharest 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 1
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.