Ukraine on Gay Propaganda - Page 2
Forum Index > General Forum |
AngryMag
Germany1040 Posts
| ||
Klondikebar
United States2227 Posts
On October 12 2012 04:03 FabledIntegral wrote: The myth is rather tha HIV is much more common in homosexuals, particularly males, which is very true. That's not a myth when you look at percents. Homosexual males don't need to use a condom as a form of birth control and at the same time anal sex is significantly more likely to contract HIV due to the increased probability of minor cuts being exposed. Just like a heterosexual couple partaking in anal sex is more likely to contract HIV if one of the partners has HIV/AIDS than if they just had vaginal sex. I am skeptical of those statistics (although I won't argue with them too hard). Homosexual men are also much more educated about HIV and are therefore more likely to be regularly tested and diagnosed. Heterosexuals are less educated and less likely to be diagnosed. The sample is very likely biased. You are very correct that anal sex is more likely to transmit HIV though. HIV is probably ACTUALLY more common in homosexual men in the developed world but not to the extent that they should be treated differently (aka banned from donating blood). | ||
armada[sb]
United States432 Posts
On October 12 2012 03:55 Wrath 2.1 wrote: that's good. Sex life should be something private and not something that needs advertising or parades. That's good? How in the hell is that good? Gay pride parades being cancelled because of threats of violence, people not being able to show affection to their loved one because of fear of persecution/prosecution, outlawing of homosexuality in media? Explain to me where in this there is any good? I'll be waiting. Sex life may not need advertising or parades, but equality sure as shit does. | ||
heliusx
United States2306 Posts
On October 12 2012 04:07 Euronyme wrote: LOL tolerant society decriminalizing homosexuality 1991? It's only been legal here since 1934... That was my exact thoughts at first, but they didn't get independence from the soviets until that year so that's actually not that bad pretty fast. | ||
Djabanete
United States2786 Posts
The bill aims to outlaw any "positive depiction" of gay people, including joining in gay parade marches, same-sex displays of affection (kissing, holding hands), and even watching "gay films" like Brokeback Mountain. On October 12 2012 03:55 Wrath 2.1 wrote: that's good. Sex life should be something private and not something that needs advertising or parades. So you agree that the bill should be extended to outlawing positive depictions of straight people, kissing and holding hands between straight people in public, and watching "straight films" like Bridget Jones' Diary? Or no, wait, this is still about homophobia and nothing to do with privacy. | ||
blinken
Canada368 Posts
Do these people believe that one day everyone is going to turn homosexual? They must themselves find the same sex attractive if they are even considering this; they must ban it before they let their gay feelings overwhelm them! Hetero's shouldn't be thinking about homosexuality at all unless they are struggling with their own closet feelings. Why can't people just stay the hell out of other people's lives? First rule of earth should be don't fucking tell anyone what to do unless it directly impacts your life in a harmful way. | ||
FabledIntegral
United States9232 Posts
On October 12 2012 04:08 Klondikebar wrote: I am skeptical of those statistics (although I won't argue with them too hard). Homosexual men are also much more educated about HIV and are therefore more likely to be regularly tested and diagnosed. Heterosexuals are less educated and less likely to be diagnosed. The sample is very likely biased. You are very correct that anal sex is more likely to transmit HIV though. HIV is probably ACTUALLY more common in homosexual men in the developed world but not to the extent that they should be treated differently (aka banned from donating blood). Uhh.... there isn't just one study. There's a ton. It's usually estimated that while homosexual men make up <8% of the male population, they generally consist of near 50% of the males infected with HIV. I know 4 different people with HIV/AIDS, unfortunately all are homosexual and all have their bachelors ![]() 1/5 males estimated to have it? That's a definite high enough rate to at least double check the blood. WASHINGTON, D.C., August 18, 2011 (LifeSiteNews.com) - The U.S. Centers for Disease Control has estimated that practicing homosexual men account for 61% of the new HIV infections in the United States while they only amount to about 2% of the country’s population. Earlier this month, the CDC released estimates for HIV infections from 2006-2009 showing that new infections remained stable at around 50,000 for each of the four years. Homosexual men (men who have sex with men) accounted for 29,300 of the estimated 48,100 new infections in 2009, and homosexual men aged 13 to 29 accounted for 27% of the new cases. http://www.lifesitenews.com/news/cdc-homosexual-men-account-for-61-of-new-hiv-infections-but-only-2-of-popul/ In 2005, over half of new HIV infections diagnosed in the US were among gay men, and up to one in five gay men living in cities is thought to be HIV positive. Yet two large population surveys showed that most gay men had similar numbers of unprotected sexual partners per year as straight men and women. http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/09/070913132930.htm National HIV/AIDS Statistics By the end of 2007, cumulative AIDS diagnoses reached an estimated 1,051,875 including 37,041 in 2007.HIV transmission patterns have shifted over time. Most new HIV infections are among gay and bisexual men (53% in 2006), a smaller share than earlier in the epidemic but the only group for which new infections are on the rise. Heterosexual transmission has accounted for a growing share of new HIV infections over time, representing 31% in 2006, although they have been on the decline in recent years. New infections due to injection drug use have declined significantly over time – by approximately 80% – and accounted for 12% of new infections in 2006. http://www.caresclinic.org/hiv/aids/national-hivaids-statistics.html | ||
tMomiji
United States1115 Posts
On October 12 2012 04:08 armada[sb] wrote: That's good? How in the hell is that good? Gay pride parades being cancelled because of threats of violence, people not being able to show affection to their loved one because of fear of persecution/prosecution, outlawing of homosexuality in media? Explain to me where in this there is any good? I'll be waiting. Sex life may not need advertising or parades, but equality sure as shit does. The problem is the misconception that all gays are like the annoying vocal minority that wants to shove their sexuality in your face and be seen as "special" for it. That minority is ruining it for the rest, the way I see it, which is awful... | ||
Merix
Ukraine28 Posts
| ||
Klondikebar
United States2227 Posts
On October 12 2012 04:16 FabledIntegral wrote: Uhh.... there isn't just one study. There's a ton. It's usually estimated that while homosexual men make up <8% of the male population, they generally consist of near 50% of the males infected with HIV. I know 4 different people with HIV/AIDS, unfortunately all are homosexual and all have their bachelors ![]() http://www.lifesitenews.com/news/cdc-homosexual-men-account-for-61-of-new-hiv-infections-but-only-2-of-popul/ http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/09/070913132930.htm http://www.caresclinic.org/hiv/aids/national-hivaids-statistics.html Jeebus. The last guy who debated this with me only had one iffy study. I stand corrected. | ||
FabledIntegral
United States9232 Posts
On October 12 2012 04:20 Klondikebar wrote: Jeebus. The last guy who debated this with me only had one iffy study. I stand corrected. No worries. I'm corrected in Gen Discussion more than 90% of the people I'd guess. | ||
Vo-one
Ukraine456 Posts
This parliament and this president look like a joke, but it's not funny at all in here. | ||
DarkPlasmaBall
United States43767 Posts
What's the main driving force for such hostility against homosexuality in the Ukraine? Is it a strongly religious or conservative country or something? Did they recently get taken over by a country with a gay leader? What's their deal? And with all this HIV talk... Showing a statistic that non-straight couples are more likely to spread HIV, you'd have a huge slippery slope on your hands there, considering it's surely the case that a specific race or other groups are people are more likely to spread HIV as well (clearly, far more Africans spread it than non-Africans: http://www.avert.org/worlstatinfo.htm should Africans not be allowed to marry or even have relationships?). Also, isn't the spread of HIV much more prevalent in dirty needles and lack of contraception use and lack of STD check-ups, rather than "oh my gosh you're gay, therefore you're more likely to spread HIV"? TL;DR- White-Ra needs to teach his country that two men performing special tactics on one another is not an abomination. | ||
armada[sb]
United States432 Posts
On October 12 2012 04:19 tMomiji wrote: The problem is the misconception that all gays are like the annoying vocal minority that wants to shove their sexuality in your face and be seen as "special" for it. That minority is ruining it for the rest, the way I see it, which is awful... I'm not sure that it has as much to do with that as it has to do with bigotry, I'm sorry. People have every right to want the freedom to express themselves, and if they do that by expressing their sexuality, then so be it. It's not like homosexuals are going door to door trying to convert people. And what's the problem with them wanting to be seen as special? | ||
docvoc
United States5491 Posts
| ||
tMomiji
United States1115 Posts
On October 12 2012 04:25 armada[sb] wrote: I'm not sure that it has as much to do with that as it has to do with bigotry, I'm sorry. People have every right to want the freedom to express themselves, and if they do that by expressing their sexuality, then so be it. It's not like homosexuals are going door to door trying to convert people. And what's the problem with them wanting to be seen as special? Well my point is more that it won't stop it from annoying some people, and these are the VOCAL minority. A lot of people think they speak for the entire group, but they don't. I think we disagree on the other point though. I see sex as something special that you keep to yourself; something that lets you bond with someone you trust and who is important to you. It's nobody's business what happens in your sex life; nobody's but your own. The problem with being seen as special for it is that it can (it won't always) lead to feelings of superiority. I don't think gays should get special treatment or attention or privileges at all...just treat them like anyone else. TLDR - "I only care about someone's sexuality when I'm trying to have sex with that person!" Edit: What you said about how gays don't go door to door trying to convert people reminded me of this... ![]() | ||
Archas
United States6531 Posts
On October 12 2012 04:24 DarkPlasmaBall wrote: TL;DR- White-Ra needs to teach his country that two men performing special tactics on one another is not an abomination. Unfortunately, in order to do that, he first needs to fight his way through an army of Zealots. | ||
Klondikebar
United States2227 Posts
On October 12 2012 04:31 tMomiji wrote: Well my point is more that it won't stop it from annoying some people, and these are the VOCAL minority. A lot of people think they speak for the entire group, but they don't. I think we disagree on the other point though. I see sex as something special that you keep to yourself; something that lets you bond with someone you trust and who is important to you. It's nobody's business what happens in your sex life; nobody's but your own. The problem with being seen as special for it is that it can (it won't always) lead to feelings of superiority. I don't think gays should get special treatment or attention or privileges at all...just treat them like anyone else. TLDR - "I only care about someone's sexuality when I'm trying to have sex with that person!" If you think sexuality should be private then surely you support a ban on all positive portrayals of heterosexual couples as well. I mean, ALL sex should be private right? | ||
Derez
Netherlands6068 Posts
On October 12 2012 04:16 FabledIntegral wrote: Uhh.... there isn't just one study. There's a ton. It's usually estimated that while homosexual men make up <8% of the male population, they generally consist of near 50% of the males infected with HIV. I know 4 different people with HIV/AIDS, unfortunately all are homosexual and all have their bachelors ![]() 1/5 males estimated to have it? That's a definite high enough rate to at least double check the blood. http://www.lifesitenews.com/news/cdc-homosexual-men-account-for-61-of-new-hiv-infections-but-only-2-of-popul/ http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/09/070913132930.htm http://www.caresclinic.org/hiv/aids/national-hivaids-statistics.html Those statistics only hold up in the US/Western Europe tho, where HIV/AIDS has never really spread beyond homosexuals and IV drug users. As an example, take any African country and the situation becomes entirely different when it spreads to the general population instead of specific subgroups that don't interact with the groups that are at risk. If I recall correctly from what I read in newspapers, in the Ukraine the epidemic is largely due to a combination high levels of prostitution and large amounts of IV drug use by prostitutes, in which case it seems likely that most of the spread happens through heterosexual sex. Looking up a quote on wikipedia quickly: The transmission of HIV among homosexuals and bisexuals does not play as great a role in Ukraine as it does in Western Europe or North America. From 1987 to 2007, 157 cases have been officially recorded, one third of them in 2007 (48 new infections). Indeed it can be assumed that along with the increase in sexual transmission in general, the number of infections among homosexuals is rising as well. By which I don't mean you're wrong or anything, just that different circumstances in different countries create different effects. | ||
Grumbels
Netherlands7028 Posts
On October 12 2012 03:44 journaIist wrote: After a rousing service in the church's warehouse-like auditorium focusing on the agonies of sin and bliss of salvation, I meet the chief pastor, Valery Reshetinsky. For him, the fight against homosexuality is a matter of "national security" upon which the survival of the nation depends. "Here's the issue," says Pastor Reshetinsky, a large-boned man with a slight moustache, tells me. "In a real democracy, my freedom and rights are limited by the freedom of someone else." In his opinion, freedom of speech for sexual minorities is a violation of what he considers his inalienable right not to have to hear something he finds offensive. "You can't do everything that you want to do, because there are people who have the exact same rights as you do," he insists. The pastor goes on to accuse a worldwide conspiracy of Masons, New-Agers, postmodernists and financiers of various nationalities, of imposing ideas that are not "characteristic for Ukraine" on the nation's children. How about the freedom of Ukrainians to not to have to be subjected to terribly offensive ideas like his? This brings to mind a mini documentary I watched during EURO2012 where they showed some of the political situation in Ukraine. It seems quite bleak to me, with corruption and lack of a future and such, so I can't really imagine people being dumb enough to fall for such divisive language, but I don't know. I guess every time on TL when there is gay bashing it is from Eastern Europeans, so maybe it actually has majority support there. *shudder* | ||
| ||