• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 05:25
CEST 11:25
KST 18:25
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL22] Ro16 Preview: Holy Diver5[ASL22] Ro16 Preview: Rough Waters10[ASL22] Ro24 Preview: Siren's Call8[ASL22] Ro24 Preview: Summer's End9Serral wins HomeStory Cup 2915
Community News
Weekly Cups (Sep 7-12): SHIN, ByuN, MaxPax double down1StarCraft open world shooter announced at BlizzCon100Weekly Cups (Aug 30-Sep 7): herO thrives amid growing schism10Official StarCraft website teases new content ahead of BlizzCon?179Stellar Fest TWO the Moon (Dec 16-20)9
StarCraft 2
General
SC4ALL II: StarCraft 2 Player Announcement 8/8 Balance hotfix patch 5.0.16b (July 16) The Death of Cheese: From a Professional Cheeser Yamato Cup Series StarCraft open world shooter announced at BlizzCon
Tourneys
Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament RSL Revival: Season 6 - Qualifiers and Main Event RSL goes to London! 2026 Offline Finals Nov 21-22 SC2 AI Tournament 2026 Fall KSL Week #92
Strategy
[H] ZvP Mid-Late Game: Stalkers Collossi HT
Custom Maps
Nexus Wars 2021 GUIDE [M] (2) Industrial Park
External Content
Mutation # 543 Enhanced Defenses The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 542 The Ascended Mutation # 541 Binary Choice
Brood War
General
Bot on ladder Man Bnet can't even load profile now, WTF an AI researcher's take on the ladder bot Syncronization issues and can't find games New 3v3 BGH Ladder (and more) on ShieldBattery!
Tourneys
[ASL22] Ro16 Group D [BSL23] SM: Ret vs TerrOr - bo7 - Sunday 9pm CEST [ASL22] Ro16 Group C [Megathread] Daily Proleagues
Strategy
Replay Review Process - What do you do? Simple Questions, Simple Answers Odyssey Mineral Stack Saturation Game Theory for Starcraft
Other Games
General Games
Warcraft III: The Frozen Throne Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread EVE Corporation Diablo IV
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
[TL LoL EUW IHs] Teemo shall perish
Heroes of the Storm
Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Canadian Politics Mega-thread Post Your Watch!
Fan Clubs
MarineLorD Fan Club The Creator Fan Club The ShoWTimE Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Diablo Animated Series on Netflix
Sports
Football (Soccer) Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 MLB/Baseball 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List Northern Ireland Global Starcraft
Blogs
Can Bots Beat Pros?? Starcr…
namkraft
[meme] I finally understa…
LUCKY_NOOB
Virtual Romance, Real-Life C…
TrAiDoS
Regacy Esports:Our Goa…
regacyesports
Dreaming of BW patches (mod…
c3rberUs
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 9438 users

Ukraine on Gay Propaganda - Page 2

Forum Index > General Forum
Post a Reply
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 8 9 10 Next All
AngryMag
Profile Joined November 2011
Germany1040 Posts
October 11 2012 19:07 GMT
#21
total bullshit bill... If the ukrainian people would have a say in that, I wouldn't care, as they can do what they want in their country. If a representative government thinks it is a pressing issue to decide whether there will be gay parades in the future or not, well, I would call it basically useless. Trying to regulate sexual orientations of the population, how ridicilous
Klondikebar
Profile Joined October 2011
United States2227 Posts
October 11 2012 19:08 GMT
#22
On October 12 2012 04:03 FabledIntegral wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 12 2012 03:49 Klondikebar wrote:
"He elaborates that the free speech of the gay minorities is a violation of other people's right to not to have to hear something offensive."

This is patently silly. Are gay people's rights violated because they have to hear the offensive line "being gay is a sin?" This really just harkens back to John Stewart when he said "you are confusing a war on religion with simply not getting your way anymore."

What sort of free speech positions does the Ukraine take? Are they as strong as they are in the US?

Edit: I also didn't realize their HIV rate was so high. If people are still stuck on the myth that homosexuality spreads HIV faster than heterosexuality then that could be the reason it's gaining such support.


The myth is rather tha HIV is much more common in homosexuals, particularly males, which is very true. That's not a myth when you look at percents. Homosexual males don't need to use a condom as a form of birth control and at the same time anal sex is significantly more likely to contract HIV due to the increased probability of minor cuts being exposed. Just like a heterosexual couple partaking in anal sex is more likely to contract HIV if one of the partners has HIV/AIDS than if they just had vaginal sex.


I am skeptical of those statistics (although I won't argue with them too hard). Homosexual men are also much more educated about HIV and are therefore more likely to be regularly tested and diagnosed. Heterosexuals are less educated and less likely to be diagnosed. The sample is very likely biased.

You are very correct that anal sex is more likely to transmit HIV though.

HIV is probably ACTUALLY more common in homosexual men in the developed world but not to the extent that they should be treated differently (aka banned from donating blood).
#2throwed
armada[sb]
Profile Joined August 2011
United States432 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-10-11 19:09:45
October 11 2012 19:08 GMT
#23
On October 12 2012 03:55 Wrath 2.1 wrote:
that's good. Sex life should be something private and not something that needs advertising or parades.


That's good? How in the hell is that good? Gay pride parades being cancelled because of threats of violence, people not being able to show affection to their loved one because of fear of persecution/prosecution, outlawing of homosexuality in media? Explain to me where in this there is any good? I'll be waiting.

Sex life may not need advertising or parades, but equality sure as shit does.
#Hitpoint @ GameSurge (IDLE=BAN)
heliusx
Profile Blog Joined May 2012
United States2306 Posts
October 11 2012 19:10 GMT
#24
On October 12 2012 04:07 Euronyme wrote:
LOL tolerant society decriminalizing homosexuality 1991?
It's only been legal here since 1934...


That was my exact thoughts at first, but they didn't get independence from the soviets until that year so that's actually not that bad pretty fast.
dude bro.
Djabanete
Profile Blog Joined May 2008
United States2786 Posts
October 11 2012 19:12 GMT
#25
The bill aims to outlaw any "positive depiction" of gay people, including joining in gay parade marches, same-sex displays of affection (kissing, holding hands), and even watching "gay films" like Brokeback Mountain.

On October 12 2012 03:55 Wrath 2.1 wrote:
that's good. Sex life should be something private and not something that needs advertising or parades.

So you agree that the bill should be extended to outlawing positive depictions of straight people, kissing and holding hands between straight people in public, and watching "straight films" like Bridget Jones' Diary?

Or no, wait, this is still about homophobia and nothing to do with privacy.
May the BeSt man win.
blinken
Profile Joined October 2010
Canada368 Posts
October 11 2012 19:15 GMT
#26
I can never understand these actions.

Do these people believe that one day everyone is going to turn homosexual? They must themselves find the same sex attractive if they are even considering this; they must ban it before they let their gay feelings overwhelm them! Hetero's shouldn't be thinking about homosexuality at all unless they are struggling with their own closet feelings.

Why can't people just stay the hell out of other people's lives? First rule of earth should be don't fucking tell anyone what to do unless it directly impacts your life in a harmful way.
FabledIntegral
Profile Blog Joined November 2008
United States9232 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-10-11 19:24:11
October 11 2012 19:16 GMT
#27
On October 12 2012 04:08 Klondikebar wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 12 2012 04:03 FabledIntegral wrote:
On October 12 2012 03:49 Klondikebar wrote:
"He elaborates that the free speech of the gay minorities is a violation of other people's right to not to have to hear something offensive."

This is patently silly. Are gay people's rights violated because they have to hear the offensive line "being gay is a sin?" This really just harkens back to John Stewart when he said "you are confusing a war on religion with simply not getting your way anymore."

What sort of free speech positions does the Ukraine take? Are they as strong as they are in the US?

Edit: I also didn't realize their HIV rate was so high. If people are still stuck on the myth that homosexuality spreads HIV faster than heterosexuality then that could be the reason it's gaining such support.


The myth is rather tha HIV is much more common in homosexuals, particularly males, which is very true. That's not a myth when you look at percents. Homosexual males don't need to use a condom as a form of birth control and at the same time anal sex is significantly more likely to contract HIV due to the increased probability of minor cuts being exposed. Just like a heterosexual couple partaking in anal sex is more likely to contract HIV if one of the partners has HIV/AIDS than if they just had vaginal sex.


I am skeptical of those statistics (although I won't argue with them too hard). Homosexual men are also much more educated about HIV and are therefore more likely to be regularly tested and diagnosed. Heterosexuals are less educated and less likely to be diagnosed. The sample is very likely biased.

You are very correct that anal sex is more likely to transmit HIV though.

HIV is probably ACTUALLY more common in homosexual men in the developed world but not to the extent that they should be treated differently (aka banned from donating blood).


Uhh.... there isn't just one study. There's a ton. It's usually estimated that while homosexual men make up <8% of the male population, they generally consist of near 50% of the males infected with HIV. I know 4 different people with HIV/AIDS, unfortunately all are homosexual and all have their bachelors . Homosexuality spreads it significantly more faster given their population representation.

1/5 males estimated to have it? That's a definite high enough rate to at least double check the blood.

WASHINGTON, D.C., August 18, 2011 (LifeSiteNews.com) - The U.S. Centers for Disease Control has estimated that practicing homosexual men account for 61% of the new HIV infections in the United States while they only amount to about 2% of the country’s population.

Earlier this month, the CDC released estimates for HIV infections from 2006-2009 showing that new infections remained stable at around 50,000 for each of the four years.

Homosexual men (men who have sex with men) accounted for 29,300 of the estimated 48,100 new infections in 2009, and homosexual men aged 13 to 29 accounted for 27% of the new cases.


http://www.lifesitenews.com/news/cdc-homosexual-men-account-for-61-of-new-hiv-infections-but-only-2-of-popul/

In 2005, over half of new HIV infections diagnosed in the US were among gay men, and up to one in five gay men living in cities is thought to be HIV positive. Yet two large population surveys showed that most gay men had similar numbers of unprotected sexual partners per year as straight men and women.


http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/09/070913132930.htm


National HIV/AIDS Statistics
By the end of 2007, cumulative AIDS diagnoses reached an estimated 1,051,875 including 37,041 in 2007.HIV transmission patterns have shifted over time. Most new HIV infections are among gay and bisexual men (53% in 2006), a smaller share than earlier in the epidemic but the only group for which new infections are on the rise. Heterosexual transmission has accounted for a growing share of new HIV infections over time, representing 31% in 2006, although they have been on the decline in recent years. New infections due to injection drug use have declined significantly over time – by approximately 80% – and accounted for 12% of new infections in 2006.


http://www.caresclinic.org/hiv/aids/national-hivaids-statistics.html
tMomiji
Profile Blog Joined July 2011
United States1115 Posts
October 11 2012 19:19 GMT
#28
On October 12 2012 04:08 armada[sb] wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 12 2012 03:55 Wrath 2.1 wrote:
that's good. Sex life should be something private and not something that needs advertising or parades.


That's good? How in the hell is that good? Gay pride parades being cancelled because of threats of violence, people not being able to show affection to their loved one because of fear of persecution/prosecution, outlawing of homosexuality in media? Explain to me where in this there is any good? I'll be waiting.

Sex life may not need advertising or parades, but equality sure as shit does.


The problem is the misconception that all gays are like the annoying vocal minority that wants to shove their sexuality in your face and be seen as "special" for it. That minority is ruining it for the rest, the way I see it, which is awful...
"I wonder if there is a league below copper? If so, I would like to inhabit it." -TotalBiscuit "In the event of a sudden change in cabin pressure, ROOF FLIES OFF!" -George Carlin <3 HerO <3 Kiwikaki <3 MKP
Merix
Profile Joined November 2011
Ukraine28 Posts
October 11 2012 19:19 GMT
#29
With ongoing parliaments election campaign in Ukraine you can't take any of this news too seriously, really... too much speculations, mass manipulations, propaganda etc. in fight for votes. Hopefully with end of elections everything will fall into place.
Klondikebar
Profile Joined October 2011
United States2227 Posts
October 11 2012 19:20 GMT
#30
On October 12 2012 04:16 FabledIntegral wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 12 2012 04:08 Klondikebar wrote:
On October 12 2012 04:03 FabledIntegral wrote:
On October 12 2012 03:49 Klondikebar wrote:
"He elaborates that the free speech of the gay minorities is a violation of other people's right to not to have to hear something offensive."

This is patently silly. Are gay people's rights violated because they have to hear the offensive line "being gay is a sin?" This really just harkens back to John Stewart when he said "you are confusing a war on religion with simply not getting your way anymore."

What sort of free speech positions does the Ukraine take? Are they as strong as they are in the US?

Edit: I also didn't realize their HIV rate was so high. If people are still stuck on the myth that homosexuality spreads HIV faster than heterosexuality then that could be the reason it's gaining such support.


The myth is rather tha HIV is much more common in homosexuals, particularly males, which is very true. That's not a myth when you look at percents. Homosexual males don't need to use a condom as a form of birth control and at the same time anal sex is significantly more likely to contract HIV due to the increased probability of minor cuts being exposed. Just like a heterosexual couple partaking in anal sex is more likely to contract HIV if one of the partners has HIV/AIDS than if they just had vaginal sex.


I am skeptical of those statistics (although I won't argue with them too hard). Homosexual men are also much more educated about HIV and are therefore more likely to be regularly tested and diagnosed. Heterosexuals are less educated and less likely to be diagnosed. The sample is very likely biased.

You are very correct that anal sex is more likely to transmit HIV though.

HIV is probably ACTUALLY more common in homosexual men in the developed world but not to the extent that they should be treated differently (aka banned from donating blood).


Uhh.... there isn't just one study. There's a ton. It's usually estimated that while homosexual men make up <8% of the male population, they generally consist of near 50% of the males infected with HIV. I know 4 different people with HIV/AIDS, unfortunately all are homosexual and all have their bachelors .

Show nested quote +
WASHINGTON, D.C., August 18, 2011 (LifeSiteNews.com) - The U.S. Centers for Disease Control has estimated that practicing homosexual men account for 61% of the new HIV infections in the United States while they only amount to about 2% of the country’s population.

Earlier this month, the CDC released estimates for HIV infections from 2006-2009 showing that new infections remained stable at around 50,000 for each of the four years.

Homosexual men (men who have sex with men) accounted for 29,300 of the estimated 48,100 new infections in 2009, and homosexual men aged 13 to 29 accounted for 27% of the new cases.


http://www.lifesitenews.com/news/cdc-homosexual-men-account-for-61-of-new-hiv-infections-but-only-2-of-popul/

Show nested quote +
In 2005, over half of new HIV infections diagnosed in the US were among gay men, and up to one in five gay men living in cities is thought to be HIV positive. Yet two large population surveys showed that most gay men had similar numbers of unprotected sexual partners per year as straight men and women.


http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/09/070913132930.htm

Show nested quote +

National HIV/AIDS Statistics
By the end of 2007, cumulative AIDS diagnoses reached an estimated 1,051,875 including 37,041 in 2007.HIV transmission patterns have shifted over time. Most new HIV infections are among gay and bisexual men (53% in 2006), a smaller share than earlier in the epidemic but the only group for which new infections are on the rise. Heterosexual transmission has accounted for a growing share of new HIV infections over time, representing 31% in 2006, although they have been on the decline in recent years. New infections due to injection drug use have declined significantly over time – by approximately 80% – and accounted for 12% of new infections in 2006.


http://www.caresclinic.org/hiv/aids/national-hivaids-statistics.html


Jeebus. The last guy who debated this with me only had one iffy study. I stand corrected.
#2throwed
FabledIntegral
Profile Blog Joined November 2008
United States9232 Posts
October 11 2012 19:22 GMT
#31
On October 12 2012 04:20 Klondikebar wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 12 2012 04:16 FabledIntegral wrote:
On October 12 2012 04:08 Klondikebar wrote:
On October 12 2012 04:03 FabledIntegral wrote:
On October 12 2012 03:49 Klondikebar wrote:
"He elaborates that the free speech of the gay minorities is a violation of other people's right to not to have to hear something offensive."

This is patently silly. Are gay people's rights violated because they have to hear the offensive line "being gay is a sin?" This really just harkens back to John Stewart when he said "you are confusing a war on religion with simply not getting your way anymore."

What sort of free speech positions does the Ukraine take? Are they as strong as they are in the US?

Edit: I also didn't realize their HIV rate was so high. If people are still stuck on the myth that homosexuality spreads HIV faster than heterosexuality then that could be the reason it's gaining such support.


The myth is rather tha HIV is much more common in homosexuals, particularly males, which is very true. That's not a myth when you look at percents. Homosexual males don't need to use a condom as a form of birth control and at the same time anal sex is significantly more likely to contract HIV due to the increased probability of minor cuts being exposed. Just like a heterosexual couple partaking in anal sex is more likely to contract HIV if one of the partners has HIV/AIDS than if they just had vaginal sex.


I am skeptical of those statistics (although I won't argue with them too hard). Homosexual men are also much more educated about HIV and are therefore more likely to be regularly tested and diagnosed. Heterosexuals are less educated and less likely to be diagnosed. The sample is very likely biased.

You are very correct that anal sex is more likely to transmit HIV though.

HIV is probably ACTUALLY more common in homosexual men in the developed world but not to the extent that they should be treated differently (aka banned from donating blood).


Uhh.... there isn't just one study. There's a ton. It's usually estimated that while homosexual men make up <8% of the male population, they generally consist of near 50% of the males infected with HIV. I know 4 different people with HIV/AIDS, unfortunately all are homosexual and all have their bachelors .

WASHINGTON, D.C., August 18, 2011 (LifeSiteNews.com) - The U.S. Centers for Disease Control has estimated that practicing homosexual men account for 61% of the new HIV infections in the United States while they only amount to about 2% of the country’s population.

Earlier this month, the CDC released estimates for HIV infections from 2006-2009 showing that new infections remained stable at around 50,000 for each of the four years.

Homosexual men (men who have sex with men) accounted for 29,300 of the estimated 48,100 new infections in 2009, and homosexual men aged 13 to 29 accounted for 27% of the new cases.


http://www.lifesitenews.com/news/cdc-homosexual-men-account-for-61-of-new-hiv-infections-but-only-2-of-popul/

In 2005, over half of new HIV infections diagnosed in the US were among gay men, and up to one in five gay men living in cities is thought to be HIV positive. Yet two large population surveys showed that most gay men had similar numbers of unprotected sexual partners per year as straight men and women.


http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/09/070913132930.htm


National HIV/AIDS Statistics
By the end of 2007, cumulative AIDS diagnoses reached an estimated 1,051,875 including 37,041 in 2007.HIV transmission patterns have shifted over time. Most new HIV infections are among gay and bisexual men (53% in 2006), a smaller share than earlier in the epidemic but the only group for which new infections are on the rise. Heterosexual transmission has accounted for a growing share of new HIV infections over time, representing 31% in 2006, although they have been on the decline in recent years. New infections due to injection drug use have declined significantly over time – by approximately 80% – and accounted for 12% of new infections in 2006.


http://www.caresclinic.org/hiv/aids/national-hivaids-statistics.html


Jeebus. The last guy who debated this with me only had one iffy study. I stand corrected.



No worries. I'm corrected in Gen Discussion more than 90% of the people I'd guess.
Vo-one
Profile Joined June 2003
Ukraine456 Posts
October 11 2012 19:22 GMT
#32
Don't bet to much on this parliament, guys. They just want to lool like nice to the world but they're doing a lot of shit inside the country. They want to do things in european way, but the most part of ukrainians won't change their minds that way.
This parliament and this president look like a joke, but it's not funny at all in here.
DarkPlasmaBall
Profile Blog Joined March 2010
United States46429 Posts
October 11 2012 19:24 GMT
#33
"No positive depiction of gay people", according to the article... holy crap, so much for saying homosexuality is the problem- it's apparently the fact that gay people are just bad people. lol wow. That's just plain insensitive and ignorant -.-'

What's the main driving force for such hostility against homosexuality in the Ukraine? Is it a strongly religious or conservative country or something? Did they recently get taken over by a country with a gay leader? What's their deal?

And with all this HIV talk... Showing a statistic that non-straight couples are more likely to spread HIV, you'd have a huge slippery slope on your hands there, considering it's surely the case that a specific race or other groups are people are more likely to spread HIV as well (clearly, far more Africans spread it than non-Africans: http://www.avert.org/worlstatinfo.htm should Africans not be allowed to marry or even have relationships?). Also, isn't the spread of HIV much more prevalent in dirty needles and lack of contraception use and lack of STD check-ups, rather than "oh my gosh you're gay, therefore you're more likely to spread HIV"?

TL;DR- White-Ra needs to teach his country that two men performing special tactics on one another is not an abomination.
"There is nothing more satisfying than looking at a crowd of people and helping them get what I love." ~Day[9] Daily #100
armada[sb]
Profile Joined August 2011
United States432 Posts
October 11 2012 19:25 GMT
#34
On October 12 2012 04:19 tMomiji wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 12 2012 04:08 armada[sb] wrote:
On October 12 2012 03:55 Wrath 2.1 wrote:
that's good. Sex life should be something private and not something that needs advertising or parades.


That's good? How in the hell is that good? Gay pride parades being cancelled because of threats of violence, people not being able to show affection to their loved one because of fear of persecution/prosecution, outlawing of homosexuality in media? Explain to me where in this there is any good? I'll be waiting.

Sex life may not need advertising or parades, but equality sure as shit does.


The problem is the misconception that all gays are like the annoying vocal minority that wants to shove their sexuality in your face and be seen as "special" for it. That minority is ruining it for the rest, the way I see it, which is awful...


I'm not sure that it has as much to do with that as it has to do with bigotry, I'm sorry. People have every right to want the freedom to express themselves, and if they do that by expressing their sexuality, then so be it. It's not like homosexuals are going door to door trying to convert people. And what's the problem with them wanting to be seen as special?
#Hitpoint @ GameSurge (IDLE=BAN)
docvoc
Profile Blog Joined July 2011
United States5491 Posts
October 11 2012 19:30 GMT
#35
What constitutes propaganda in Ukraine....
User was warned for too many mimes.
tMomiji
Profile Blog Joined July 2011
United States1115 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-10-11 19:35:34
October 11 2012 19:31 GMT
#36
On October 12 2012 04:25 armada[sb] wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 12 2012 04:19 tMomiji wrote:
On October 12 2012 04:08 armada[sb] wrote:
On October 12 2012 03:55 Wrath 2.1 wrote:
that's good. Sex life should be something private and not something that needs advertising or parades.


That's good? How in the hell is that good? Gay pride parades being cancelled because of threats of violence, people not being able to show affection to their loved one because of fear of persecution/prosecution, outlawing of homosexuality in media? Explain to me where in this there is any good? I'll be waiting.

Sex life may not need advertising or parades, but equality sure as shit does.


The problem is the misconception that all gays are like the annoying vocal minority that wants to shove their sexuality in your face and be seen as "special" for it. That minority is ruining it for the rest, the way I see it, which is awful...


I'm not sure that it has as much to do with that as it has to do with bigotry, I'm sorry. People have every right to want the freedom to express themselves, and if they do that by expressing their sexuality, then so be it. It's not like homosexuals are going door to door trying to convert people. And what's the problem with them wanting to be seen as special?


Well my point is more that it won't stop it from annoying some people, and these are the VOCAL minority. A lot of people think they speak for the entire group, but they don't.

I think we disagree on the other point though. I see sex as something special that you keep to yourself; something that lets you bond with someone you trust and who is important to you. It's nobody's business what happens in your sex life; nobody's but your own.

The problem with being seen as special for it is that it can (it won't always) lead to feelings of superiority. I don't think gays should get special treatment or attention or privileges at all...just treat them like anyone else.

TLDR - "I only care about someone's sexuality when I'm trying to have sex with that person!"

Edit: What you said about how gays don't go door to door trying to convert people reminded me of this... (Warning: Language.)
"I wonder if there is a league below copper? If so, I would like to inhabit it." -TotalBiscuit "In the event of a sudden change in cabin pressure, ROOF FLIES OFF!" -George Carlin <3 HerO <3 Kiwikaki <3 MKP
Archas
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
United States6531 Posts
October 11 2012 19:32 GMT
#37
On October 12 2012 04:24 DarkPlasmaBall wrote:
TL;DR- White-Ra needs to teach his country that two men performing special tactics on one another is not an abomination.

Unfortunately, in order to do that, he first needs to fight his way through an army of Zealots.
The room is ripe with the stench of bitches!
Klondikebar
Profile Joined October 2011
United States2227 Posts
October 11 2012 19:35 GMT
#38
On October 12 2012 04:31 tMomiji wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 12 2012 04:25 armada[sb] wrote:
On October 12 2012 04:19 tMomiji wrote:
On October 12 2012 04:08 armada[sb] wrote:
On October 12 2012 03:55 Wrath 2.1 wrote:
that's good. Sex life should be something private and not something that needs advertising or parades.


That's good? How in the hell is that good? Gay pride parades being cancelled because of threats of violence, people not being able to show affection to their loved one because of fear of persecution/prosecution, outlawing of homosexuality in media? Explain to me where in this there is any good? I'll be waiting.

Sex life may not need advertising or parades, but equality sure as shit does.


The problem is the misconception that all gays are like the annoying vocal minority that wants to shove their sexuality in your face and be seen as "special" for it. That minority is ruining it for the rest, the way I see it, which is awful...


I'm not sure that it has as much to do with that as it has to do with bigotry, I'm sorry. People have every right to want the freedom to express themselves, and if they do that by expressing their sexuality, then so be it. It's not like homosexuals are going door to door trying to convert people. And what's the problem with them wanting to be seen as special?


Well my point is more that it won't stop it from annoying some people, and these are the VOCAL minority. A lot of people think they speak for the entire group, but they don't.

I think we disagree on the other point though. I see sex as something special that you keep to yourself; something that lets you bond with someone you trust and who is important to you. It's nobody's business what happens in your sex life; nobody's but your own.

The problem with being seen as special for it is that it can (it won't always) lead to feelings of superiority. I don't think gays should get special treatment or attention or privileges at all...just treat them like anyone else.

TLDR - "I only care about someone's sexuality when I'm trying to have sex with that person!"


If you think sexuality should be private then surely you support a ban on all positive portrayals of heterosexual couples as well. I mean, ALL sex should be private right?
#2throwed
Derez
Profile Blog Joined January 2011
Netherlands6068 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-10-11 19:37:18
October 11 2012 19:36 GMT
#39
On October 12 2012 04:16 FabledIntegral wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 12 2012 04:08 Klondikebar wrote:
On October 12 2012 04:03 FabledIntegral wrote:
On October 12 2012 03:49 Klondikebar wrote:
"He elaborates that the free speech of the gay minorities is a violation of other people's right to not to have to hear something offensive."

This is patently silly. Are gay people's rights violated because they have to hear the offensive line "being gay is a sin?" This really just harkens back to John Stewart when he said "you are confusing a war on religion with simply not getting your way anymore."

What sort of free speech positions does the Ukraine take? Are they as strong as they are in the US?

Edit: I also didn't realize their HIV rate was so high. If people are still stuck on the myth that homosexuality spreads HIV faster than heterosexuality then that could be the reason it's gaining such support.


The myth is rather tha HIV is much more common in homosexuals, particularly males, which is very true. That's not a myth when you look at percents. Homosexual males don't need to use a condom as a form of birth control and at the same time anal sex is significantly more likely to contract HIV due to the increased probability of minor cuts being exposed. Just like a heterosexual couple partaking in anal sex is more likely to contract HIV if one of the partners has HIV/AIDS than if they just had vaginal sex.


I am skeptical of those statistics (although I won't argue with them too hard). Homosexual men are also much more educated about HIV and are therefore more likely to be regularly tested and diagnosed. Heterosexuals are less educated and less likely to be diagnosed. The sample is very likely biased.

You are very correct that anal sex is more likely to transmit HIV though.

HIV is probably ACTUALLY more common in homosexual men in the developed world but not to the extent that they should be treated differently (aka banned from donating blood).


Uhh.... there isn't just one study. There's a ton. It's usually estimated that while homosexual men make up <8% of the male population, they generally consist of near 50% of the males infected with HIV. I know 4 different people with HIV/AIDS, unfortunately all are homosexual and all have their bachelors . Homosexuality spreads it significantly more faster given their population representation.

1/5 males estimated to have it? That's a definite high enough rate to at least double check the blood.

Show nested quote +
WASHINGTON, D.C., August 18, 2011 (LifeSiteNews.com) - The U.S. Centers for Disease Control has estimated that practicing homosexual men account for 61% of the new HIV infections in the United States while they only amount to about 2% of the country’s population.

Earlier this month, the CDC released estimates for HIV infections from 2006-2009 showing that new infections remained stable at around 50,000 for each of the four years.

Homosexual men (men who have sex with men) accounted for 29,300 of the estimated 48,100 new infections in 2009, and homosexual men aged 13 to 29 accounted for 27% of the new cases.


http://www.lifesitenews.com/news/cdc-homosexual-men-account-for-61-of-new-hiv-infections-but-only-2-of-popul/

Show nested quote +
In 2005, over half of new HIV infections diagnosed in the US were among gay men, and up to one in five gay men living in cities is thought to be HIV positive. Yet two large population surveys showed that most gay men had similar numbers of unprotected sexual partners per year as straight men and women.


http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/09/070913132930.htm

Show nested quote +

National HIV/AIDS Statistics
By the end of 2007, cumulative AIDS diagnoses reached an estimated 1,051,875 including 37,041 in 2007.HIV transmission patterns have shifted over time. Most new HIV infections are among gay and bisexual men (53% in 2006), a smaller share than earlier in the epidemic but the only group for which new infections are on the rise. Heterosexual transmission has accounted for a growing share of new HIV infections over time, representing 31% in 2006, although they have been on the decline in recent years. New infections due to injection drug use have declined significantly over time – by approximately 80% – and accounted for 12% of new infections in 2006.


http://www.caresclinic.org/hiv/aids/national-hivaids-statistics.html

Those statistics only hold up in the US/Western Europe tho, where HIV/AIDS has never really spread beyond homosexuals and IV drug users. As an example, take any African country and the situation becomes entirely different when it spreads to the general population instead of specific subgroups that don't interact with the groups that are at risk.

If I recall correctly from what I read in newspapers, in the Ukraine the epidemic is largely due to a combination high levels of prostitution and large amounts of IV drug use by prostitutes, in which case it seems likely that most of the spread happens through heterosexual sex.

Looking up a quote on wikipedia quickly:
The transmission of HIV among homosexuals and bisexuals does not play as great a role in Ukraine as it does in Western Europe or North America. From 1987 to 2007, 157 cases have been officially recorded, one third of them in 2007 (48 new infections). Indeed it can be assumed that along with the increase in sexual transmission in general, the number of infections among homosexuals is rising as well.


By which I don't mean you're wrong or anything, just that different circumstances in different countries create different effects.
Grumbels
Profile Blog Joined May 2009
Netherlands7032 Posts
October 11 2012 19:37 GMT
#40
On October 12 2012 03:44 journaIist wrote:
After a rousing service in the church's warehouse-like auditorium focusing on the agonies of sin and bliss of salvation, I meet the chief pastor, Valery Reshetinsky. For him, the fight against homosexuality is a matter of "national security" upon which the survival of the nation depends.

"Here's the issue," says Pastor Reshetinsky, a large-boned man with a slight moustache, tells me. "In a real democracy, my freedom and rights are limited by the freedom of someone else."

In his opinion, freedom of speech for sexual minorities is a violation of what he considers his inalienable right not to have to hear something he finds offensive.

"You can't do everything that you want to do, because there are people who have the exact same rights as you do," he insists.

The pastor goes on to accuse a worldwide conspiracy of Masons, New-Agers, postmodernists and financiers of various nationalities, of imposing ideas that are not "characteristic for Ukraine" on the nation's children.

How about the freedom of Ukrainians to not to have to be subjected to terribly offensive ideas like his?

This brings to mind a mini documentary I watched during EURO2012 where they showed some of the political situation in Ukraine. It seems quite bleak to me, with corruption and lack of a future and such, so I can't really imagine people being dumb enough to fall for such divisive language, but I don't know. I guess every time on TL when there is gay bashing it is from Eastern Europeans, so maybe it actually has majority support there. *shudder*
Well, now I tell you, I never seen good come o' goodness yet. Him as strikes first is my fancy; dead men don't bite; them's my views--amen, so be it.
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 8 9 10 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 1h 35m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft: Brood War
Bisu 2550
Shuttle 641
Jaedong 425
Leta 207
firebathero 177
Dewaltoss 93
Sexy 71
Barracks 56
ToSsGirL 35
NaDa 28
[ Show more ]
Aegong 23
Sharp 21
Free 17
SilentControl 15
Terrorterran 8
910 8
Noble 5
Britney 0
Dota 2
Gorgc4508
League of Legends
JimRising 423
Counter-Strike
edward245
Other Games
crisheroes207
XaKoH 177
Mew2King75
Organizations
Dota 2
PGL Dota 2 - Main Stream8337
PGL Dota 2 - Secondary Stream1529
Other Games
gamesdonequick902
[ Show 11 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH267
• LUISG 15
• Letter145
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• Migwel
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Upcoming Events
GSL
1h 35m
AI Arena Tournament
7h 35m
Replay Cast
14h 35m
GSL
1d 1h
Shopify Rebellion Sundays
1d 5h
Spirit vs Mixu
BSL
1d 9h
Ret vs TerrOr
Replay Cast
1d 14h
Afreeca Starleague
2 days
Shine vs Rush
WardiTV Weekly
2 days
Monday Night Weeklies
2 days
[ Show More ]
Sparkling Tuna Cup
3 days
Afreeca Starleague
3 days
Light vs EffOrt
PiGosaur Cup
3 days
Kung Fu Cup
4 days
The PondCast
5 days
Replay Cast
5 days
Korean StarCraft League
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 3
Blizzard Classic Cup 2026
Big Dog Cup 2026 Div 1

Ongoing

K-JUNGMAN
ASL Season 22
Super Anchor Qualifying S3
CSL 2026 AUTUMN (S22)
Acropolis #5
Acropolis #5 - GSA
Calamity Invitational
Logitech G Play Connect 2026
SL StarSeries Fall 2026
FISSURE Playground #3
BLAST Open Fall 2026
Esports World Cup 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer Qual
Stake Ranked Episode 3
XSE Pro League 2026

Upcoming

Acropolis #5 - GSB
Acropolis #5 - GSC
SC4ALL II: Brood War
HSC XXX
Stellar Fest 2: Lunar Cup
SC4ALL II: StarCraft II
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
RSL Offline Finals
Copium Cup
PGL Major Singapore 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 6
BLAST Rivals Fall 2026
IEM Beijing 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 5
PGL Masters Bucharest 2026
1win Private Club #2
Thunderpick World Champ. '26
ESL Pro League Season 24
Stake Ranked Episode 4
1win Private Club #1
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.