• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 16:42
CEST 22:42
KST 05:42
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Serral wins EWC 202531Tournament Spotlight: FEL Cracow 20259Power Rank - Esports World Cup 202580RSL Season 1 - Final Week9[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall15
Community News
[BSL 2025] H2 - Team Wars, Weeklies & SB Ladder8EWC 2025 - Replay Pack4Google Play ASL (Season 20) Announced38BSL Team Wars - Bonyth, Dewalt, Hawk & Sziky teams10Weekly Cups (July 14-20): Final Check-up0
StarCraft 2
General
The GOAT ranking of GOAT rankings Firefly given lifetime ban by ESIC following match-fixing investigation Classic: "Serral is Like Hitting a Brick Wall" Serral wins EWC 2025 EWC 2025 - Replay Pack
Tourneys
Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond) TaeJa vs Creator Bo7 SC Evo Showmatch Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $10,000 live event Esports World Cup 2025
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation # 484 Magnetic Pull Mutation #239 Bad Weather Mutation # 483 Kill Bot Wars Mutation # 482 Wheel of Misfortune
Brood War
General
Flash Announces (and Retracts) Hiatus From ASL BW General Discussion [BSL 2025] H2 - Team Wars, Weeklies & SB Ladder Brood War web app to calculate unit interactions Google Play ASL (Season 20) Announced
Tourneys
Small VOD Thread 2.0 [Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL] Non-Korean Championship - Final weekend [BSL20] Non-Korean Championship 4x BSL + 4x China
Strategy
Does 1 second matter in StarCraft? Simple Questions, Simple Answers Muta micro map competition [G] Mineral Boosting
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread Beyond All Reason Total Annihilation Server - TAForever [MMORPG] Tree of Savior (Successor of Ragnarok)
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Vanilla Mini Mafia TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Canadian Politics Mega-thread Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative UK Politics Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
INnoVation Fan Club SKT1 Classic Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Korean Music Discussion
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NBA General Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Gtx660 graphics card replacement Installation of Windows 10 suck at "just a moment" Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
TeamLiquid Team Shirt On Sale The Automated Ban List
Blogs
The Link Between Fitness and…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Socialism Anyone?
GreenHorizons
Eight Anniversary as a TL…
Mizenhauer
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 701 users

Ukraine on Gay Propaganda - Page 2

Forum Index > General Forum
Post a Reply
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 8 9 10 Next All
AngryMag
Profile Joined November 2011
Germany1040 Posts
October 11 2012 19:07 GMT
#21
total bullshit bill... If the ukrainian people would have a say in that, I wouldn't care, as they can do what they want in their country. If a representative government thinks it is a pressing issue to decide whether there will be gay parades in the future or not, well, I would call it basically useless. Trying to regulate sexual orientations of the population, how ridicilous
Klondikebar
Profile Joined October 2011
United States2227 Posts
October 11 2012 19:08 GMT
#22
On October 12 2012 04:03 FabledIntegral wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 12 2012 03:49 Klondikebar wrote:
"He elaborates that the free speech of the gay minorities is a violation of other people's right to not to have to hear something offensive."

This is patently silly. Are gay people's rights violated because they have to hear the offensive line "being gay is a sin?" This really just harkens back to John Stewart when he said "you are confusing a war on religion with simply not getting your way anymore."

What sort of free speech positions does the Ukraine take? Are they as strong as they are in the US?

Edit: I also didn't realize their HIV rate was so high. If people are still stuck on the myth that homosexuality spreads HIV faster than heterosexuality then that could be the reason it's gaining such support.


The myth is rather tha HIV is much more common in homosexuals, particularly males, which is very true. That's not a myth when you look at percents. Homosexual males don't need to use a condom as a form of birth control and at the same time anal sex is significantly more likely to contract HIV due to the increased probability of minor cuts being exposed. Just like a heterosexual couple partaking in anal sex is more likely to contract HIV if one of the partners has HIV/AIDS than if they just had vaginal sex.


I am skeptical of those statistics (although I won't argue with them too hard). Homosexual men are also much more educated about HIV and are therefore more likely to be regularly tested and diagnosed. Heterosexuals are less educated and less likely to be diagnosed. The sample is very likely biased.

You are very correct that anal sex is more likely to transmit HIV though.

HIV is probably ACTUALLY more common in homosexual men in the developed world but not to the extent that they should be treated differently (aka banned from donating blood).
#2throwed
armada[sb]
Profile Joined August 2011
United States432 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-10-11 19:09:45
October 11 2012 19:08 GMT
#23
On October 12 2012 03:55 Wrath 2.1 wrote:
that's good. Sex life should be something private and not something that needs advertising or parades.


That's good? How in the hell is that good? Gay pride parades being cancelled because of threats of violence, people not being able to show affection to their loved one because of fear of persecution/prosecution, outlawing of homosexuality in media? Explain to me where in this there is any good? I'll be waiting.

Sex life may not need advertising or parades, but equality sure as shit does.
#Hitpoint @ GameSurge (IDLE=BAN)
heliusx
Profile Blog Joined May 2012
United States2306 Posts
October 11 2012 19:10 GMT
#24
On October 12 2012 04:07 Euronyme wrote:
LOL tolerant society decriminalizing homosexuality 1991?
It's only been legal here since 1934...


That was my exact thoughts at first, but they didn't get independence from the soviets until that year so that's actually not that bad pretty fast.
dude bro.
Djabanete
Profile Blog Joined May 2008
United States2786 Posts
October 11 2012 19:12 GMT
#25
The bill aims to outlaw any "positive depiction" of gay people, including joining in gay parade marches, same-sex displays of affection (kissing, holding hands), and even watching "gay films" like Brokeback Mountain.

On October 12 2012 03:55 Wrath 2.1 wrote:
that's good. Sex life should be something private and not something that needs advertising or parades.

So you agree that the bill should be extended to outlawing positive depictions of straight people, kissing and holding hands between straight people in public, and watching "straight films" like Bridget Jones' Diary?

Or no, wait, this is still about homophobia and nothing to do with privacy.
May the BeSt man win.
blinken
Profile Joined October 2010
Canada368 Posts
October 11 2012 19:15 GMT
#26
I can never understand these actions.

Do these people believe that one day everyone is going to turn homosexual? They must themselves find the same sex attractive if they are even considering this; they must ban it before they let their gay feelings overwhelm them! Hetero's shouldn't be thinking about homosexuality at all unless they are struggling with their own closet feelings.

Why can't people just stay the hell out of other people's lives? First rule of earth should be don't fucking tell anyone what to do unless it directly impacts your life in a harmful way.
FabledIntegral
Profile Blog Joined November 2008
United States9232 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-10-11 19:24:11
October 11 2012 19:16 GMT
#27
On October 12 2012 04:08 Klondikebar wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 12 2012 04:03 FabledIntegral wrote:
On October 12 2012 03:49 Klondikebar wrote:
"He elaborates that the free speech of the gay minorities is a violation of other people's right to not to have to hear something offensive."

This is patently silly. Are gay people's rights violated because they have to hear the offensive line "being gay is a sin?" This really just harkens back to John Stewart when he said "you are confusing a war on religion with simply not getting your way anymore."

What sort of free speech positions does the Ukraine take? Are they as strong as they are in the US?

Edit: I also didn't realize their HIV rate was so high. If people are still stuck on the myth that homosexuality spreads HIV faster than heterosexuality then that could be the reason it's gaining such support.


The myth is rather tha HIV is much more common in homosexuals, particularly males, which is very true. That's not a myth when you look at percents. Homosexual males don't need to use a condom as a form of birth control and at the same time anal sex is significantly more likely to contract HIV due to the increased probability of minor cuts being exposed. Just like a heterosexual couple partaking in anal sex is more likely to contract HIV if one of the partners has HIV/AIDS than if they just had vaginal sex.


I am skeptical of those statistics (although I won't argue with them too hard). Homosexual men are also much more educated about HIV and are therefore more likely to be regularly tested and diagnosed. Heterosexuals are less educated and less likely to be diagnosed. The sample is very likely biased.

You are very correct that anal sex is more likely to transmit HIV though.

HIV is probably ACTUALLY more common in homosexual men in the developed world but not to the extent that they should be treated differently (aka banned from donating blood).


Uhh.... there isn't just one study. There's a ton. It's usually estimated that while homosexual men make up <8% of the male population, they generally consist of near 50% of the males infected with HIV. I know 4 different people with HIV/AIDS, unfortunately all are homosexual and all have their bachelors . Homosexuality spreads it significantly more faster given their population representation.

1/5 males estimated to have it? That's a definite high enough rate to at least double check the blood.

WASHINGTON, D.C., August 18, 2011 (LifeSiteNews.com) - The U.S. Centers for Disease Control has estimated that practicing homosexual men account for 61% of the new HIV infections in the United States while they only amount to about 2% of the country’s population.

Earlier this month, the CDC released estimates for HIV infections from 2006-2009 showing that new infections remained stable at around 50,000 for each of the four years.

Homosexual men (men who have sex with men) accounted for 29,300 of the estimated 48,100 new infections in 2009, and homosexual men aged 13 to 29 accounted for 27% of the new cases.


http://www.lifesitenews.com/news/cdc-homosexual-men-account-for-61-of-new-hiv-infections-but-only-2-of-popul/

In 2005, over half of new HIV infections diagnosed in the US were among gay men, and up to one in five gay men living in cities is thought to be HIV positive. Yet two large population surveys showed that most gay men had similar numbers of unprotected sexual partners per year as straight men and women.


http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/09/070913132930.htm


National HIV/AIDS Statistics
By the end of 2007, cumulative AIDS diagnoses reached an estimated 1,051,875 including 37,041 in 2007.HIV transmission patterns have shifted over time. Most new HIV infections are among gay and bisexual men (53% in 2006), a smaller share than earlier in the epidemic but the only group for which new infections are on the rise. Heterosexual transmission has accounted for a growing share of new HIV infections over time, representing 31% in 2006, although they have been on the decline in recent years. New infections due to injection drug use have declined significantly over time – by approximately 80% – and accounted for 12% of new infections in 2006.


http://www.caresclinic.org/hiv/aids/national-hivaids-statistics.html
tMomiji
Profile Blog Joined July 2011
United States1115 Posts
October 11 2012 19:19 GMT
#28
On October 12 2012 04:08 armada[sb] wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 12 2012 03:55 Wrath 2.1 wrote:
that's good. Sex life should be something private and not something that needs advertising or parades.


That's good? How in the hell is that good? Gay pride parades being cancelled because of threats of violence, people not being able to show affection to their loved one because of fear of persecution/prosecution, outlawing of homosexuality in media? Explain to me where in this there is any good? I'll be waiting.

Sex life may not need advertising or parades, but equality sure as shit does.


The problem is the misconception that all gays are like the annoying vocal minority that wants to shove their sexuality in your face and be seen as "special" for it. That minority is ruining it for the rest, the way I see it, which is awful...
"I wonder if there is a league below copper? If so, I would like to inhabit it." -TotalBiscuit "In the event of a sudden change in cabin pressure, ROOF FLIES OFF!" -George Carlin <3 HerO <3 Kiwikaki <3 MKP
Merix
Profile Joined November 2011
Ukraine28 Posts
October 11 2012 19:19 GMT
#29
With ongoing parliaments election campaign in Ukraine you can't take any of this news too seriously, really... too much speculations, mass manipulations, propaganda etc. in fight for votes. Hopefully with end of elections everything will fall into place.
Klondikebar
Profile Joined October 2011
United States2227 Posts
October 11 2012 19:20 GMT
#30
On October 12 2012 04:16 FabledIntegral wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 12 2012 04:08 Klondikebar wrote:
On October 12 2012 04:03 FabledIntegral wrote:
On October 12 2012 03:49 Klondikebar wrote:
"He elaborates that the free speech of the gay minorities is a violation of other people's right to not to have to hear something offensive."

This is patently silly. Are gay people's rights violated because they have to hear the offensive line "being gay is a sin?" This really just harkens back to John Stewart when he said "you are confusing a war on religion with simply not getting your way anymore."

What sort of free speech positions does the Ukraine take? Are they as strong as they are in the US?

Edit: I also didn't realize their HIV rate was so high. If people are still stuck on the myth that homosexuality spreads HIV faster than heterosexuality then that could be the reason it's gaining such support.


The myth is rather tha HIV is much more common in homosexuals, particularly males, which is very true. That's not a myth when you look at percents. Homosexual males don't need to use a condom as a form of birth control and at the same time anal sex is significantly more likely to contract HIV due to the increased probability of minor cuts being exposed. Just like a heterosexual couple partaking in anal sex is more likely to contract HIV if one of the partners has HIV/AIDS than if they just had vaginal sex.


I am skeptical of those statistics (although I won't argue with them too hard). Homosexual men are also much more educated about HIV and are therefore more likely to be regularly tested and diagnosed. Heterosexuals are less educated and less likely to be diagnosed. The sample is very likely biased.

You are very correct that anal sex is more likely to transmit HIV though.

HIV is probably ACTUALLY more common in homosexual men in the developed world but not to the extent that they should be treated differently (aka banned from donating blood).


Uhh.... there isn't just one study. There's a ton. It's usually estimated that while homosexual men make up <8% of the male population, they generally consist of near 50% of the males infected with HIV. I know 4 different people with HIV/AIDS, unfortunately all are homosexual and all have their bachelors .

Show nested quote +
WASHINGTON, D.C., August 18, 2011 (LifeSiteNews.com) - The U.S. Centers for Disease Control has estimated that practicing homosexual men account for 61% of the new HIV infections in the United States while they only amount to about 2% of the country’s population.

Earlier this month, the CDC released estimates for HIV infections from 2006-2009 showing that new infections remained stable at around 50,000 for each of the four years.

Homosexual men (men who have sex with men) accounted for 29,300 of the estimated 48,100 new infections in 2009, and homosexual men aged 13 to 29 accounted for 27% of the new cases.


http://www.lifesitenews.com/news/cdc-homosexual-men-account-for-61-of-new-hiv-infections-but-only-2-of-popul/

Show nested quote +
In 2005, over half of new HIV infections diagnosed in the US were among gay men, and up to one in five gay men living in cities is thought to be HIV positive. Yet two large population surveys showed that most gay men had similar numbers of unprotected sexual partners per year as straight men and women.


http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/09/070913132930.htm

Show nested quote +

National HIV/AIDS Statistics
By the end of 2007, cumulative AIDS diagnoses reached an estimated 1,051,875 including 37,041 in 2007.HIV transmission patterns have shifted over time. Most new HIV infections are among gay and bisexual men (53% in 2006), a smaller share than earlier in the epidemic but the only group for which new infections are on the rise. Heterosexual transmission has accounted for a growing share of new HIV infections over time, representing 31% in 2006, although they have been on the decline in recent years. New infections due to injection drug use have declined significantly over time – by approximately 80% – and accounted for 12% of new infections in 2006.


http://www.caresclinic.org/hiv/aids/national-hivaids-statistics.html


Jeebus. The last guy who debated this with me only had one iffy study. I stand corrected.
#2throwed
FabledIntegral
Profile Blog Joined November 2008
United States9232 Posts
October 11 2012 19:22 GMT
#31
On October 12 2012 04:20 Klondikebar wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 12 2012 04:16 FabledIntegral wrote:
On October 12 2012 04:08 Klondikebar wrote:
On October 12 2012 04:03 FabledIntegral wrote:
On October 12 2012 03:49 Klondikebar wrote:
"He elaborates that the free speech of the gay minorities is a violation of other people's right to not to have to hear something offensive."

This is patently silly. Are gay people's rights violated because they have to hear the offensive line "being gay is a sin?" This really just harkens back to John Stewart when he said "you are confusing a war on religion with simply not getting your way anymore."

What sort of free speech positions does the Ukraine take? Are they as strong as they are in the US?

Edit: I also didn't realize their HIV rate was so high. If people are still stuck on the myth that homosexuality spreads HIV faster than heterosexuality then that could be the reason it's gaining such support.


The myth is rather tha HIV is much more common in homosexuals, particularly males, which is very true. That's not a myth when you look at percents. Homosexual males don't need to use a condom as a form of birth control and at the same time anal sex is significantly more likely to contract HIV due to the increased probability of minor cuts being exposed. Just like a heterosexual couple partaking in anal sex is more likely to contract HIV if one of the partners has HIV/AIDS than if they just had vaginal sex.


I am skeptical of those statistics (although I won't argue with them too hard). Homosexual men are also much more educated about HIV and are therefore more likely to be regularly tested and diagnosed. Heterosexuals are less educated and less likely to be diagnosed. The sample is very likely biased.

You are very correct that anal sex is more likely to transmit HIV though.

HIV is probably ACTUALLY more common in homosexual men in the developed world but not to the extent that they should be treated differently (aka banned from donating blood).


Uhh.... there isn't just one study. There's a ton. It's usually estimated that while homosexual men make up <8% of the male population, they generally consist of near 50% of the males infected with HIV. I know 4 different people with HIV/AIDS, unfortunately all are homosexual and all have their bachelors .

WASHINGTON, D.C., August 18, 2011 (LifeSiteNews.com) - The U.S. Centers for Disease Control has estimated that practicing homosexual men account for 61% of the new HIV infections in the United States while they only amount to about 2% of the country’s population.

Earlier this month, the CDC released estimates for HIV infections from 2006-2009 showing that new infections remained stable at around 50,000 for each of the four years.

Homosexual men (men who have sex with men) accounted for 29,300 of the estimated 48,100 new infections in 2009, and homosexual men aged 13 to 29 accounted for 27% of the new cases.


http://www.lifesitenews.com/news/cdc-homosexual-men-account-for-61-of-new-hiv-infections-but-only-2-of-popul/

In 2005, over half of new HIV infections diagnosed in the US were among gay men, and up to one in five gay men living in cities is thought to be HIV positive. Yet two large population surveys showed that most gay men had similar numbers of unprotected sexual partners per year as straight men and women.


http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/09/070913132930.htm


National HIV/AIDS Statistics
By the end of 2007, cumulative AIDS diagnoses reached an estimated 1,051,875 including 37,041 in 2007.HIV transmission patterns have shifted over time. Most new HIV infections are among gay and bisexual men (53% in 2006), a smaller share than earlier in the epidemic but the only group for which new infections are on the rise. Heterosexual transmission has accounted for a growing share of new HIV infections over time, representing 31% in 2006, although they have been on the decline in recent years. New infections due to injection drug use have declined significantly over time – by approximately 80% – and accounted for 12% of new infections in 2006.


http://www.caresclinic.org/hiv/aids/national-hivaids-statistics.html


Jeebus. The last guy who debated this with me only had one iffy study. I stand corrected.



No worries. I'm corrected in Gen Discussion more than 90% of the people I'd guess.
Vo-one
Profile Joined June 2003
Ukraine456 Posts
October 11 2012 19:22 GMT
#32
Don't bet to much on this parliament, guys. They just want to lool like nice to the world but they're doing a lot of shit inside the country. They want to do things in european way, but the most part of ukrainians won't change their minds that way.
This parliament and this president look like a joke, but it's not funny at all in here.
DarkPlasmaBall
Profile Blog Joined March 2010
United States44324 Posts
October 11 2012 19:24 GMT
#33
"No positive depiction of gay people", according to the article... holy crap, so much for saying homosexuality is the problem- it's apparently the fact that gay people are just bad people. lol wow. That's just plain insensitive and ignorant -.-'

What's the main driving force for such hostility against homosexuality in the Ukraine? Is it a strongly religious or conservative country or something? Did they recently get taken over by a country with a gay leader? What's their deal?

And with all this HIV talk... Showing a statistic that non-straight couples are more likely to spread HIV, you'd have a huge slippery slope on your hands there, considering it's surely the case that a specific race or other groups are people are more likely to spread HIV as well (clearly, far more Africans spread it than non-Africans: http://www.avert.org/worlstatinfo.htm should Africans not be allowed to marry or even have relationships?). Also, isn't the spread of HIV much more prevalent in dirty needles and lack of contraception use and lack of STD check-ups, rather than "oh my gosh you're gay, therefore you're more likely to spread HIV"?

TL;DR- White-Ra needs to teach his country that two men performing special tactics on one another is not an abomination.
"There is nothing more satisfying than looking at a crowd of people and helping them get what I love." ~Day[9] Daily #100
armada[sb]
Profile Joined August 2011
United States432 Posts
October 11 2012 19:25 GMT
#34
On October 12 2012 04:19 tMomiji wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 12 2012 04:08 armada[sb] wrote:
On October 12 2012 03:55 Wrath 2.1 wrote:
that's good. Sex life should be something private and not something that needs advertising or parades.


That's good? How in the hell is that good? Gay pride parades being cancelled because of threats of violence, people not being able to show affection to their loved one because of fear of persecution/prosecution, outlawing of homosexuality in media? Explain to me where in this there is any good? I'll be waiting.

Sex life may not need advertising or parades, but equality sure as shit does.


The problem is the misconception that all gays are like the annoying vocal minority that wants to shove their sexuality in your face and be seen as "special" for it. That minority is ruining it for the rest, the way I see it, which is awful...


I'm not sure that it has as much to do with that as it has to do with bigotry, I'm sorry. People have every right to want the freedom to express themselves, and if they do that by expressing their sexuality, then so be it. It's not like homosexuals are going door to door trying to convert people. And what's the problem with them wanting to be seen as special?
#Hitpoint @ GameSurge (IDLE=BAN)
docvoc
Profile Blog Joined July 2011
United States5491 Posts
October 11 2012 19:30 GMT
#35
What constitutes propaganda in Ukraine....
User was warned for too many mimes.
tMomiji
Profile Blog Joined July 2011
United States1115 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-10-11 19:35:34
October 11 2012 19:31 GMT
#36
On October 12 2012 04:25 armada[sb] wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 12 2012 04:19 tMomiji wrote:
On October 12 2012 04:08 armada[sb] wrote:
On October 12 2012 03:55 Wrath 2.1 wrote:
that's good. Sex life should be something private and not something that needs advertising or parades.


That's good? How in the hell is that good? Gay pride parades being cancelled because of threats of violence, people not being able to show affection to their loved one because of fear of persecution/prosecution, outlawing of homosexuality in media? Explain to me where in this there is any good? I'll be waiting.

Sex life may not need advertising or parades, but equality sure as shit does.


The problem is the misconception that all gays are like the annoying vocal minority that wants to shove their sexuality in your face and be seen as "special" for it. That minority is ruining it for the rest, the way I see it, which is awful...


I'm not sure that it has as much to do with that as it has to do with bigotry, I'm sorry. People have every right to want the freedom to express themselves, and if they do that by expressing their sexuality, then so be it. It's not like homosexuals are going door to door trying to convert people. And what's the problem with them wanting to be seen as special?


Well my point is more that it won't stop it from annoying some people, and these are the VOCAL minority. A lot of people think they speak for the entire group, but they don't.

I think we disagree on the other point though. I see sex as something special that you keep to yourself; something that lets you bond with someone you trust and who is important to you. It's nobody's business what happens in your sex life; nobody's but your own.

The problem with being seen as special for it is that it can (it won't always) lead to feelings of superiority. I don't think gays should get special treatment or attention or privileges at all...just treat them like anyone else.

TLDR - "I only care about someone's sexuality when I'm trying to have sex with that person!"

Edit: What you said about how gays don't go door to door trying to convert people reminded me of this... (Warning: Language.)
"I wonder if there is a league below copper? If so, I would like to inhabit it." -TotalBiscuit "In the event of a sudden change in cabin pressure, ROOF FLIES OFF!" -George Carlin <3 HerO <3 Kiwikaki <3 MKP
Archas
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
United States6531 Posts
October 11 2012 19:32 GMT
#37
On October 12 2012 04:24 DarkPlasmaBall wrote:
TL;DR- White-Ra needs to teach his country that two men performing special tactics on one another is not an abomination.

Unfortunately, in order to do that, he first needs to fight his way through an army of Zealots.
The room is ripe with the stench of bitches!
Klondikebar
Profile Joined October 2011
United States2227 Posts
October 11 2012 19:35 GMT
#38
On October 12 2012 04:31 tMomiji wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 12 2012 04:25 armada[sb] wrote:
On October 12 2012 04:19 tMomiji wrote:
On October 12 2012 04:08 armada[sb] wrote:
On October 12 2012 03:55 Wrath 2.1 wrote:
that's good. Sex life should be something private and not something that needs advertising or parades.


That's good? How in the hell is that good? Gay pride parades being cancelled because of threats of violence, people not being able to show affection to their loved one because of fear of persecution/prosecution, outlawing of homosexuality in media? Explain to me where in this there is any good? I'll be waiting.

Sex life may not need advertising or parades, but equality sure as shit does.


The problem is the misconception that all gays are like the annoying vocal minority that wants to shove their sexuality in your face and be seen as "special" for it. That minority is ruining it for the rest, the way I see it, which is awful...


I'm not sure that it has as much to do with that as it has to do with bigotry, I'm sorry. People have every right to want the freedom to express themselves, and if they do that by expressing their sexuality, then so be it. It's not like homosexuals are going door to door trying to convert people. And what's the problem with them wanting to be seen as special?


Well my point is more that it won't stop it from annoying some people, and these are the VOCAL minority. A lot of people think they speak for the entire group, but they don't.

I think we disagree on the other point though. I see sex as something special that you keep to yourself; something that lets you bond with someone you trust and who is important to you. It's nobody's business what happens in your sex life; nobody's but your own.

The problem with being seen as special for it is that it can (it won't always) lead to feelings of superiority. I don't think gays should get special treatment or attention or privileges at all...just treat them like anyone else.

TLDR - "I only care about someone's sexuality when I'm trying to have sex with that person!"


If you think sexuality should be private then surely you support a ban on all positive portrayals of heterosexual couples as well. I mean, ALL sex should be private right?
#2throwed
Derez
Profile Blog Joined January 2011
Netherlands6068 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-10-11 19:37:18
October 11 2012 19:36 GMT
#39
On October 12 2012 04:16 FabledIntegral wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 12 2012 04:08 Klondikebar wrote:
On October 12 2012 04:03 FabledIntegral wrote:
On October 12 2012 03:49 Klondikebar wrote:
"He elaborates that the free speech of the gay minorities is a violation of other people's right to not to have to hear something offensive."

This is patently silly. Are gay people's rights violated because they have to hear the offensive line "being gay is a sin?" This really just harkens back to John Stewart when he said "you are confusing a war on religion with simply not getting your way anymore."

What sort of free speech positions does the Ukraine take? Are they as strong as they are in the US?

Edit: I also didn't realize their HIV rate was so high. If people are still stuck on the myth that homosexuality spreads HIV faster than heterosexuality then that could be the reason it's gaining such support.


The myth is rather tha HIV is much more common in homosexuals, particularly males, which is very true. That's not a myth when you look at percents. Homosexual males don't need to use a condom as a form of birth control and at the same time anal sex is significantly more likely to contract HIV due to the increased probability of minor cuts being exposed. Just like a heterosexual couple partaking in anal sex is more likely to contract HIV if one of the partners has HIV/AIDS than if they just had vaginal sex.


I am skeptical of those statistics (although I won't argue with them too hard). Homosexual men are also much more educated about HIV and are therefore more likely to be regularly tested and diagnosed. Heterosexuals are less educated and less likely to be diagnosed. The sample is very likely biased.

You are very correct that anal sex is more likely to transmit HIV though.

HIV is probably ACTUALLY more common in homosexual men in the developed world but not to the extent that they should be treated differently (aka banned from donating blood).


Uhh.... there isn't just one study. There's a ton. It's usually estimated that while homosexual men make up <8% of the male population, they generally consist of near 50% of the males infected with HIV. I know 4 different people with HIV/AIDS, unfortunately all are homosexual and all have their bachelors . Homosexuality spreads it significantly more faster given their population representation.

1/5 males estimated to have it? That's a definite high enough rate to at least double check the blood.

Show nested quote +
WASHINGTON, D.C., August 18, 2011 (LifeSiteNews.com) - The U.S. Centers for Disease Control has estimated that practicing homosexual men account for 61% of the new HIV infections in the United States while they only amount to about 2% of the country’s population.

Earlier this month, the CDC released estimates for HIV infections from 2006-2009 showing that new infections remained stable at around 50,000 for each of the four years.

Homosexual men (men who have sex with men) accounted for 29,300 of the estimated 48,100 new infections in 2009, and homosexual men aged 13 to 29 accounted for 27% of the new cases.


http://www.lifesitenews.com/news/cdc-homosexual-men-account-for-61-of-new-hiv-infections-but-only-2-of-popul/

Show nested quote +
In 2005, over half of new HIV infections diagnosed in the US were among gay men, and up to one in five gay men living in cities is thought to be HIV positive. Yet two large population surveys showed that most gay men had similar numbers of unprotected sexual partners per year as straight men and women.


http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/09/070913132930.htm

Show nested quote +

National HIV/AIDS Statistics
By the end of 2007, cumulative AIDS diagnoses reached an estimated 1,051,875 including 37,041 in 2007.HIV transmission patterns have shifted over time. Most new HIV infections are among gay and bisexual men (53% in 2006), a smaller share than earlier in the epidemic but the only group for which new infections are on the rise. Heterosexual transmission has accounted for a growing share of new HIV infections over time, representing 31% in 2006, although they have been on the decline in recent years. New infections due to injection drug use have declined significantly over time – by approximately 80% – and accounted for 12% of new infections in 2006.


http://www.caresclinic.org/hiv/aids/national-hivaids-statistics.html

Those statistics only hold up in the US/Western Europe tho, where HIV/AIDS has never really spread beyond homosexuals and IV drug users. As an example, take any African country and the situation becomes entirely different when it spreads to the general population instead of specific subgroups that don't interact with the groups that are at risk.

If I recall correctly from what I read in newspapers, in the Ukraine the epidemic is largely due to a combination high levels of prostitution and large amounts of IV drug use by prostitutes, in which case it seems likely that most of the spread happens through heterosexual sex.

Looking up a quote on wikipedia quickly:
The transmission of HIV among homosexuals and bisexuals does not play as great a role in Ukraine as it does in Western Europe or North America. From 1987 to 2007, 157 cases have been officially recorded, one third of them in 2007 (48 new infections). Indeed it can be assumed that along with the increase in sexual transmission in general, the number of infections among homosexuals is rising as well.


By which I don't mean you're wrong or anything, just that different circumstances in different countries create different effects.
Grumbels
Profile Blog Joined May 2009
Netherlands7031 Posts
October 11 2012 19:37 GMT
#40
On October 12 2012 03:44 journaIist wrote:
After a rousing service in the church's warehouse-like auditorium focusing on the agonies of sin and bliss of salvation, I meet the chief pastor, Valery Reshetinsky. For him, the fight against homosexuality is a matter of "national security" upon which the survival of the nation depends.

"Here's the issue," says Pastor Reshetinsky, a large-boned man with a slight moustache, tells me. "In a real democracy, my freedom and rights are limited by the freedom of someone else."

In his opinion, freedom of speech for sexual minorities is a violation of what he considers his inalienable right not to have to hear something he finds offensive.

"You can't do everything that you want to do, because there are people who have the exact same rights as you do," he insists.

The pastor goes on to accuse a worldwide conspiracy of Masons, New-Agers, postmodernists and financiers of various nationalities, of imposing ideas that are not "characteristic for Ukraine" on the nation's children.

How about the freedom of Ukrainians to not to have to be subjected to terribly offensive ideas like his?

This brings to mind a mini documentary I watched during EURO2012 where they showed some of the political situation in Ukraine. It seems quite bleak to me, with corruption and lack of a future and such, so I can't really imagine people being dumb enough to fall for such divisive language, but I don't know. I guess every time on TL when there is gay bashing it is from Eastern Europeans, so maybe it actually has majority support there. *shudder*
Well, now I tell you, I never seen good come o' goodness yet. Him as strikes first is my fancy; dead men don't bite; them's my views--amen, so be it.
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 8 9 10 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
BSL
20:30
Team Wars - Round 1
Bonyth vs Sziky
ZZZero.O62
LiquipediaDiscussion
OSC
18:00
Mid Season Playoffs
SHIN vs KrystianerLIVE!
ByuN vs TBD
ShoWTimE vs Spirit
SteadfastSC339
IndyStarCraft 296
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
SteadfastSC 339
IndyStarCraft 296
UpATreeSC 195
StarCraft: Brood War
firebathero 235
Aegong 86
ZZZero.O 62
MaD[AoV]43
NaDa 12
ggaemo 0
Dota 2
capcasts791
Counter-Strike
Stewie2K576
flusha524
Foxcn507
Heroes of the Storm
Liquid`Hasu511
Other Games
tarik_tv9621
gofns7359
summit1g4314
fl0m3564
qojqva863
mouzStarbuck263
ToD193
Trikslyr80
Sick33
PPMD33
Organizations
StarCraft 2
angryscii 28
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 21 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• davetesta167
• StrangeGG 67
• sitaska31
• Reevou 5
• musti20045 2
• Kozan
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• sooper7s
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
StarCraft: Brood War
• HerbMon 27
• 80smullet 14
• FirePhoenix11
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Other Games
• imaqtpie1413
• Scarra1040
• Shiphtur169
Upcoming Events
WardiTV European League
19h 18m
MaNa vs NightPhoenix
ByuN vs YoungYakov
ShoWTimE vs Nicoract
Harstem vs ArT
Korean StarCraft League
1d 6h
CranKy Ducklings
1d 13h
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
1d 15h
Mihu vs QiaoGege
Zhanhun vs Dewalt
Fengzi vs TBD
WardiTV European League
1d 19h
Online Event
1d 21h
Sparkling Tuna Cup
2 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
2 days
Bonyth vs TBD
WardiTV European League
2 days
Wardi Open
3 days
[ Show More ]
OSC
4 days
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
5 days
The PondCast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

BSL 20 Non-Korean Championship
FEL Cracow 2025
Underdog Cup #2

Ongoing

Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
BSL 20 Team Wars
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 3
CC Div. A S7
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025

Upcoming

BSL 21 Qualifiers
ASL Season 20: Qualifier #1
ASL Season 20: Qualifier #2
ASL Season 20
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
BSL Season 21
RSL Revival: Season 2
Maestros of the Game
SEL Season 2 Championship
WardiTV Summer 2025
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
HCC Europe
Roobet Cup 2025
Yuqilin POB S2
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.