EPT
If Peter Dinklage is not a "lead actor" on GoT then nobody is?[TV] HBO Game of Thrones - Page 1440
| Forum Index > Media & Entertainment |
All book discussion in this thread is now allowed. | ||
|
opisska
Poland8852 Posts
If Peter Dinklage is not a "lead actor" on GoT then nobody is? | ||
|
Conti
Germany2516 Posts
On July 17 2015 01:46 opisska wrote: Everyone is nominated as as "supporting actor(ess)" - who do they support? If Peter Dinklage is not a "lead actor" on GoT then nobody is?Correct. With so many characters, no single character has gotten enough screentime to be considered a "lead actor". The same thing happened back then with The Lord of the Rings, where all the "main" characters have been suggested to be nominated for best supporting actor/actress. | ||
|
scudst0rm
Canada1149 Posts
| ||
Yhamm
France7248 Posts
The question is: How much beyond seven are we going to do? Obviously we’re shooting six now, hopefully discussing seven. [Showrunners David Benioff and Dan Weiss are] feel like there’s two more years after six. I would always love for them to change their minds, but that’s what we’re looking at right now. I would be open to anything that Dan and David wanted to do—about Game of Thrones, or any subject matter. […] It really would depend fully on what they wanted to do. I think you’re right, there’s enormous storytelling to be mined in a prequel, if George and Dan and David decide they want to tackle that. At this point, all the focus is on the next few years of the show. We haven’t had any conversations about that at this point. | ||
|
Alcathous
Netherlands219 Posts
| ||
|
{CC}StealthBlue
United States41117 Posts
Ian McShane, best known for his terrifying turn as the foul-mouthed anti-hero of Deadwood, will be returning to HBO, by way of Westeros. According to Entertainment Weekly, McShane and his unsettling eyes have been cast in an undisclosed role for season six of Game of Thrones. Source | ||
|
Reaps
United Kingdom1280 Posts
| ||
|
Tunkeg
Norway1235 Posts
If McShane is to have a role in GoT I assume it will not be a small and insignificant one. If it is the role I think it is then I am actually abit hyped, even though I will probably imagine him to say "cocksucker!" every other sentence. | ||
|
Yoav
United States1874 Posts
Wonder who he'll play. He's got such gravitas/power it has to be someone of real significance in this world, so the options are actually pretty limited for people we haven't seen yet. We've met the leadership of every house in Westeros, the leaders of Pentos and the important power players in Bravos. #LordOfLightIncarnateHype | ||
|
Zooper31
United States5713 Posts
On August 02 2015 12:05 Yoav wrote: Ian McShane in Kings was one of my favorite TV performances of all time. Maybe #1. Very excited. (Kings got super Games of Thronesey by the end too). Wonder who he'll play. He's got such gravitas/power it has to be someone of real significance in this world, so the options are actually pretty limited for people we haven't seen yet. We've met the leadership of every house in Westeros, the leaders of Pentos and the important power players in Bravos. #LordOfLightIncarnateHype Or he plays an actor in a flashback relating to Jon Snow, inb4 he's Jon Snow's actual father. | ||
|
Dunmer
United Kingdom568 Posts
I have my own idea but its just a speculation. | ||
|
Acrofales
Spain18445 Posts
On August 02 2015 07:04 Tunkeg wrote: Ian McShane as Al Swearengen in Deadwood is imo the best portrayel of a character in a tv series or movie ever. I really loved Deadwood, and McShanes performance was superb. My biggest problem with McShane though is that I keep seeing Al in any role that McShane does, even the role McShane had in Kung Fu Panda. His performance in Deadwood was too good. If McShane is to have a role in GoT I assume it will not be a small and insignificant one. If it is the role I think it is then I am actually abit hyped, even though I will probably imagine him to say "cocksucker!" every other sentence. All that talk of Deadwood, I knew I knew the name from somewhere. He's Lovejoy! Anyway, now I have to watch Deadwood | ||
|
FFGenerations
7088 Posts
| ||
|
Sableyeah
Netherlands2119 Posts
| ||
|
Dav1oN
Ukraine3164 Posts
| ||
|
Wuster
1974 Posts
On September 16 2015 18:51 cSc.Dav1oN wrote: interesting to know what the odds about is Stannis alive or not, I just cannot belive they could drop him in such weird way using Shireen Shireen was for a cheap shock. I don't think they can bring Stannis back, they built him up so the audience would root for him (it was pretty heavy-handed imo). Then pulled the rug out with Shireen and tore him down. You can't bring him back without walking that arc back. Not that that arc was great (like I said heavy-handed and cheap shock value), but I think the series is close enough to the end and any role Stannis could play inconsequential enough that they'll stick to their guns on this. I liked how the producers tried to deflect the hate they got for Stannis' arc on GRRM too. And maybe it really was how GRRM wanted Stannis' arc to end, in which case they definitely won't be bringing him back. | ||
Adreme
United States5574 Posts
On September 17 2015 02:19 Wuster wrote: Shireen was for a cheap shock. I don't think they can bring Stannis back, they built him up so the audience would root for him (it was pretty heavy-handed imo). Then pulled the rug out with Shireen and tore him down. You can't bring him back without walking that arc back. Not that that arc was great (like I said heavy-handed and cheap shock value), but I think the series is close enough to the end and any role Stannis could play inconsequential enough that they'll stick to their guns on this. I liked how the producers tried to deflect the hate they got for Stannis' arc on GRRM too. And maybe it really was how GRRM wanted Stannis' arc to end, in which case they definitely won't be bringing him back. That arc made me respect Stannis so to call it a cheap shot is a little unfair. Before this I was not exactly rooting for him because before this season (including his scenes with Jon) he was just honestly one of the most boring subplots of the series with no real particular interesting events going on around him. The Shireen arc highlights how he knows what he has to do and even though he REALLY does not want to do it he believes that if he does not then she will die along with the rest of westeros so he has no winning move that saves his daughter. That choice actually made me respect him a lot more then I would have because he knew what had to be done. | ||
Plexa
Aotearoa39261 Posts
| ||
|
Wuster
1974 Posts
@Plexa, it's interesting that you say his arc isn't really about him, because I think that's why I disliked it so much. The way they handled Ramsay's 20 good men for starters... This isn't Starcraft, you can't just send your reapers to cliff jump and the factory / supply depots aren't neatly labeled for you to torch in the middle of the night. Then they can't seem to decide how to handle the Red God. In Season 2 Mel birthed a shadow baby, Thoros raised Beric from the dead several times, Mel implied she could even control wildfyre! Then in later seasons she's wrong about everything, admits to Queen Selyse that she uses literal smoke and mirrors to get people to believe in her power (despite previously having actual power), she's powerless to manipulate the fires Ramsay's men set. I guess you can go 50-50 on if burning Shireen did anything (melted the snow, didn't bring Stannis victory), but that and the leeches all seemed to fall flat if we're supposed to believe she has real power. We'll see what they do with her next season. Fan theories already say she's conveniently at Castle Black to magic Jon Snow back to life, but how exactly has the show lead us to believe that's something she can do with all the undermining of her supernatural abilities to this point? | ||
|
TMG26
Portugal2017 Posts
| ||
| ||
