From Wikileaks:
On Monday February 27th, 2012, WikiLeaks began publishing The Global Intelligence Files, over five million e-mails from the Texas headquartered "global intelligence" company Stratfor. The e-mails date between July 2004 and late December 2011. They reveal the inner workings of a company that fronts as an intelligence publisher, but provides confidential intelligence services to large corporations, such as Bhopal's Dow Chemical Co., Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman, Raytheon and government agencies, including the US Department of Homeland Security, the US Marines and the US Defence Intelligence Agency. The emails show Stratfor's web of informers, pay-off structure, payment laundering techniques and psychological methods.
So whats so big about these e-mails?
Trapwire:
Quote from Businessinsider.com
Every few seconds, data picked up at surveillance points in major cities and landmarks across the United States are recorded digitally on the spot, then encrypted and instantaneously delivered to a fortified central database center at an undisclosed location to be aggregated with other intelligence. It’s part of a program called TrapWire and it's the brainchild of the Abraxas, a Northern Virginia company staffed with elite from America’s intelligence community.
The employee roster at Arbaxas reads like a who’s who of agents once with the Pentagon, CIA and other government entities according to their public LinkedIn profiles, and the corporation's ties are assumed to go deeper than even documented. The details on Abraxas and, to an even greater extent TrapWire, are scarce, however, and not without reason. For a program touted as a tool to thwart terrorism and monitor activity meant to be under wraps, its understandable that Abraxas would want the program’s public presence to be relatively limited. But thanks to last year’s hack of the Strategic Forecasting intelligence agency, or Stratfor, all of that is quickly changing."
So: those spooky new "circular" dark globe cameras installed in your neighborhood park, town, or city—they aren't just passively monitoring. They're plugged into Trapwire and they are potentially monitoring every single person via facial recognition.
There isn't too much information right now because it just got leaked and how hard it is to access it however..... these are a few sites reporting about it despite them not being too reliable.
Wikileaks Mirror site, much more accesible with full access to leaked e-mails http://mirror2.wikileaks-press.org/gifiles/releasedate/2012-08-09.html
http://rt.com/usa/news/stratfor-trapwire-abraxas-wikileaks-313/
http://www.businessinsider.com/trapwire-everything-you-need-to-know-2012-8
I'll update as more information comes in.
For people asking about how they will analyze all the data:
http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2012/03/ff_nsadatacenter/all/1
This is a quote from the article by a whistleblower who used to work for the NSA. The Utah Data center is basically made to store/analyze data from all intelligence agencies.
Under construction by contractors with top-secret clearances, the blandly named Utah Data Center is being built for the National Security Agency. A project of immense secrecy, it is the final piece in a complex puzzle assembled over the past decade. Its purpose: to intercept, decipher, analyze, and store vast swaths of the world’s communications as they zap down from satellites and zip through the underground and undersea cables of international, foreign, and domestic networks. The heavily fortified $2 billion center should be up and running in September 2013. Flowing through its servers and routers and stored in near-bottomless databases will be all forms of communication, including the complete contents of private emails, cell phone calls, and Google searches, as well as all sorts of personal data trails—parking receipts, travel itineraries, bookstore purchases, and other digital “pocket litter.” It is, in some measure, the realization of the “total information awareness” program created during the first term of the Bush administration—an effort that was killed by Congress in 2003 after it caused an outcry over its potential for invading Americans’ privacy.
Poll:
On August 11 2012 09:29 TotalNightmare wrote:
Well I think there is something missing in the OP and for now I will just put the poll here:
Well I think there is something missing in the OP and for now I will just put the poll here:
Poll: Are you surprised by this?
No, I always suspected it. (448)
70%
No and yes - I am not surprised but I never thought of it. (103)
16%
No, but I thought it wouldn't be that big. (52)
8%
Yes, and I am questioning how something like this could have been unobserved. (16)
3%
Yes and I still dont believe that this is actually true and not just hoax. (14)
2%
Yes, but I wonder how this could happen. (4)
1%
637 total votes
No and yes - I am not surprised but I never thought of it. (103)
No, but I thought it wouldn't be that big. (52)
Yes, and I am questioning how something like this could have been unobserved. (16)
Yes and I still dont believe that this is actually true and not just hoax. (14)
Yes, but I wonder how this could happen. (4)
637 total votes
Your vote: Are you surprised by this?
(Vote): No, I always suspected it.
(Vote): No, but I thought it wouldn't be that big.
(Vote): No and yes - I am not surprised but I never thought of it.
(Vote): Yes, but I wonder how this could happen.
(Vote): Yes, and I am questioning how something like this could have been unobserved.
(Vote): Yes and I still dont believe that this is actually true and not just hoax.