I don't see why you wouldn't be a good sportsman about the game.
Should You GG A Barcode? - Page 4
Forum Index > SC2 General |
Sorathez
Australia209 Posts
I don't see why you wouldn't be a good sportsman about the game. | ||
dUTtrOACh
Canada2339 Posts
On October 04 2020 09:49 Danglars wrote: Always GG. That one's on you, not them. I guess it's kinda an old school 90s gamer mentality, since I don't see this very much shared with people that started gaming in the 2000s. Arcades did have a way of espousing sportsmanship. | ||
llllllll
1 Post
![]() AlexPKeaton aka pinky29 aka moral posturing ex GM -> proxy 2 rax reaper every game into mech/BC Solution? Hard counter dat ass and collect ladder points | ||
Jealous
10111 Posts
On October 04 2020 11:04 llllllll wrote: ![]() AlexPKeaton aka pinky29 aka moral posturing ex GM -> proxy 2 rax reaper every game into mech/BC Solution? Hard counter dat ass and collect ladder points REKT ![]() | ||
SickeL
110 Posts
| ||
![]()
The_Templar
your Country52797 Posts
| ||
Luolis
Finland7100 Posts
| ||
ZiZzy
Germany7 Posts
Also nice screenshot @llllllll (sick name!) | ||
ejozl
Denmark3343 Posts
On October 04 2020 20:58 Luolis wrote: Just dont gg anyone unless theyre your friends ;; They could potentially become your friend, if you act nicely. | ||
Drfilip
Sweden590 Posts
The poll specified "MID LEVEL" in all caps. So, it is important that the level of play is the middle of the pack, the median. The median is gold/platinum (I am verging on diamond, so that's actually way above median, about 20 percentage points too high). That is a level where monobattlers in 1v1 can have a win rate over 50% because the monobattler is more familiar with their build than their opponent. I believe that the advantage of anonymity in repeated games won't be significant. The skill of players is too varying between games and situations for the anonymity to matter. My top diamond skills include scouting a 1-base terran, forgetting the scouted information and just macroing up until my main gets destroyed by the terran drop, miss doing any macro whenever something interesting is happening, not multitasking at all (ever) etc. Barcodes won't help at a way lower level of play. Having a barcode name won't change the game, so why treat it any different than any other game? | ||
sneakyfox
8216 Posts
On October 04 2020 22:42 ejozl wrote: They could potentially become your friend, if you act nicely. Even better, if you don't gg your friends you may just get rid of them ![]() | ||
Dangermousecatdog
United Kingdom7084 Posts
| ||
AirbladeOrange
United States2573 Posts
| ||
neptunusfisk
2286 Posts
| ||
dUTtrOACh
Canada2339 Posts
EDIT: Hey, same exact number of posts as the person above me. Cool cool cool. | ||
Sorusaba
275 Posts
On October 04 2020 14:40 The_Templar wrote: For me, saying gg is just acknowledging that the game happened and is now over. this is exactly it. It's just a staple of the game. What's with people coming up with these weird rules and conditions to something that's existed since starcraft itself? lol | ||
![]()
The_Templar
your Country52797 Posts
On October 05 2020 00:06 Sorusaba wrote: this is exactly it. It's just a staple of the game. What's with people coming up with these weird rules and conditions to something that's existed since starcraft itself? lol I mean, people can do whatever they want, right? My older brother used to say gg both when he was winning and losing, and the game would sometimes last for a while after that. But I wasn't going to tell him that he was saying gg wrong. On October 04 2020 20:58 Luolis wrote: Just dont gg anyone unless theyre your friends ;; Maybe everyone is my friend though >:| | ||
pinky29
57 Posts
| ||
pinky29
57 Posts
On October 04 2020 22:46 Drfilip wrote: As a mid level random player that always (as long as I don't forget) tells my race, GL HF and end games with gg, this thread is quite interesting. The only thing missing is a barcode name. The poll specified "MID LEVEL" in all caps. So, it is important that the level of play is the middle of the pack, the median. The median is gold/platinum (I am verging on diamond, so that's actually way above median, about 20 percentage points too high). That is a level where monobattlers in 1v1 can have a win rate over 50% because the monobattler is more familiar with their build than their opponent. I believe that the advantage of anonymity in repeated games won't be significant. The skill of players is too varying between games and situations for the anonymity to matter. My top diamond skills include scouting a 1-base terran, forgetting the scouted information and just macroing up until my main gets destroyed by the terran drop, miss doing any macro whenever something interesting is happening, not multitasking at all (ever) etc. Barcodes won't help at a way lower level of play. Having a barcode name won't change the game, so why treat it any different than any other game? Your points are all valid; however, I take exception with the last line "Having a barcode won't change the game...". I have to disagree with that last statement mainly because I encounter many of the same players online and recognize their names. In fact, sometimes I hit them so much that I recall "Oh ya, this guy likes to proxy DT" or "I remember this guy...he always cannon rushes." Many people can say the same about me..."this guy likes reapers or always goes proxy". With a barcode the anonymity is there and they can exploit the situation without scouting or performing a hard counter. I change my builds if I know someone knows "my style". The game is not on equal footing when a barcode already knows your style while retaining their anonymity. It also breeds for more BM on their side versus someone with a name. | ||
tigon_ridge
482 Posts
I also think it's really weird that you can leave the game immediately after sending the GG. To me, saying GG is like extending a hand for a handshake, not just an admittance of a loss. I think blizzard should add a new feature: when a player sends GG, the 'quit' function is grayed out for 10 seconds, or until the winner types GG back. That would do two things: it would give more meaning to GGing out, and also removes the pointless pressure on players to say "good game" even when they don't believe it. | ||
| ||