|
On August 06 2012 06:37 Chocobo wrote:This story is now on the front page of CNN.com. + Show Spoiler +
:O There is a shooting that killed 6 in Wisconsin, but this is the big front page story. Wow.
|
CNN: Mvp = a successful professional person; mkp = a game addicted kid Fair enough.
|
On August 06 2012 07:36 KillingVector wrote:Except the discussion about the article isn't whether pro gamers should be classified as "athletes." It is for the most part about whether their long practice sessions are the result of an addiction or dedication. The author is going to shift the discussion to semantics by just using a crappy title for his follow up article.
Right, too late to edit now but I guess the more accurate thing to say would be "to give another topic for discussion."
|
On August 06 2012 07:40 Vestrel wrote:Show nested quote +On August 06 2012 07:36 KillingVector wrote:Except the discussion about the article isn't whether pro gamers should be classified as "athletes." It is for the most part about whether their long practice sessions are the result of an addiction or dedication. The author is going to shift the discussion to semantics by just using a crappy title for his follow up article. Right, too late to edit now but I guess the more accurate thing to say would be "to give another topic for discussion."
Its not your fault. The author calls it "a follow-up story based on some of your comments" in one of his comments. I think it just shows how much the author doesn't really get it. Either that, or he's secretly a bnet forum troll who was tired of dragging up this old "athletes" argument on the bnet forums and decided to go for the big time.
|
That article is disgusting. Wasn't expecting much but seriously, they're professionals, not addict.
edit : just saw the follow up article. Nice. I tweeted to the guy some good feedback about that. The gaming community can be a bit harsh sometimes but we know how to forget people if they redeem themselves. =)
|
I really disliked the original article, but I think the followup one has redeemed the writer somewhat. The comments he posted are fairly mature and intelligent replies that while a lot of people will still probably ignore thanks to the tone of the article, at least allows people our community to voice some views to the good.
|
I think the article has much to go in storyline. Saying marineking won in 8 minutes should not be "he won in just 8 minutes" it should be more like "he executed a well disguised rush and caught his opponent off guard.
Also, go seemed like an indicative sign of addiction, but its actually BFD in the gamig community. Plus " he plays not because he wants to, but has to." seems a little too over the top. Is marinekings past weighing on him at wcg? Probably not as much as this article makes it out to be:
This article is disliked in my mind because it makes a "philosophical" question about gaming and then discusses it using MKP and statistics and government actions..it all paints the wrong picture
|
|
He's going to write a follow up piece about eSports, and he asked if he could quote me from an email I wrote, so I'm hoping for the best. I told him he should go on LO3 or SOTG and maybe talk to the admins of TL for a larger Q/A if he really wants to know more about us
|
MVP, whose parents saw that he wasn't excelling in school and enrolled him in an after-school academy for "StarCraft" players because they wanted him to go pro
Can we put aside the CNN is hurting e-sports discussion for just one moment and appreciate how amazing this is. MVP literally went to Starcraft school because that was the career his parents wanted him to enter.
And also, that, much like Yu-Gi-Oh, there are literally Starcraft schools. That blew my mind a little.
|
On August 06 2012 07:29 Hyperionnn wrote:Show nested quote +On August 06 2012 07:27 LGStarcraft wrote: Video games are but one of many forms of addiction in society, and I find it somewhat unfair that these news programs are putting the spotlight solely on videogames. Of course anything in excess is bad, but its not like videogames are worse than drug trafficking or prostitution. JUS' SAYIN. The problem is, you cant compare videogames with a normal stuff even though you are horribly biased. JUS' SAYIN. Comments like this highlight the stigma around video games. So video games aren't "normal" stuff?. I dont know any males that are between the ages of 15-30 that dont play video games to some extent (be it a little or alot) sounds pretty normal to me. Not to mention with the rise of mobile gaming that number is becoming even greater and as mobile games get more complex the difference between conventional and mobile gaming is becoming less obvious.
|
On August 06 2012 08:16 Ribbon wrote: there are literally Starcraft schools. That blew my mind a little.
I found that pretty interesting as well!
I actually enjoyed the article. I have watched e-sports evolve from before video games themselves were really competitive. I think the article shows pretty clearly that those who are "outside" the social rings are not just writing it off anymore. The article quite obviously gives credence to esports being legitimate. I would venture a guess that the journalists preconceived bias was challenged greatly in writing the article, however, it still colored it.
When games first started, they were really just seen as a kids thing. When those kids grew up, and didnt stop playing, that started to shift the culture into being more widely accepted. I have a feeling that when the kids of those kids are grown, or perhaps even the next generation, the idea of video games truly being a sport will be unquestioned.
The issue with sports in general is that they are relatively useless beyond the revunue they create. The revenue is what lends them legitimacy. As we continue to see revenues increase in e-sports, I suspect that will be directly proportional to their perceived legitimacy by the general populous.
Of course, the idea of addiction is present with video games just as much as anything else in life. Anything we do, especially on a daily basis, can turn into a habit which then can very easily turn into a psychological addiction. IMO, this lack of moderation is an issue across the board when it affects quality of life. However, culturally, it is only seen as an issue when it does not generate income.
|
On August 06 2012 01:41 Shiori wrote:Show nested quote +On August 06 2012 01:38 Rah wrote:On August 06 2012 01:27 jeeeeohn wrote:On August 05 2012 14:25 Itsmedudeman wrote:On August 05 2012 14:21 Wegandi wrote:On August 05 2012 14:18 Zzoram wrote: Where are the articles about American Football addiction and how 4 players die each year from football on average, never mind the thousands of concussions that can lead to permanent brain damage? It's only an addiction when they disagree with your personal behavior. If you play a physical sport like say, football, or baseball for 5+ hours everyday, you're lauded. If you study math or science for 10+ hours a day, you're lauded. God forbid, you were a unique individual with their own likes and desires instead of some tabula rasa for them to mold to their own ends. Never ceases, does it? ? Dumb comparison. Most people can't play physical sports as long for as long as someone can play a video game (and addicts can play all day), and someone who studies actually benefits from it? Wtf? Are we really comparing the productivity of studying math and science to that of playing a video game here? Let me know how that looks on a college application. TL is really out of touch it seems these days.. Thank you for writing this because if I had I'd probably have gotten a warning or temp ban. TL is insane nowadays, which is really just representative of the culture in general wherein wasting time has somehow evolved into productivity. Newsflash: headline: every pro player is addicted to the game and video games are not art and video games are not productive, at all, ever, not now or in the future. You are not a special snowflake for grinding Starcraft 2 into the soft bits of your brain twelve hours a day. Go read a book or something. It's truth that there's no difference between grinding SC2 12 hrs a day and any other game or MMO out there. There's a pro scene but that's a huge amount of time wasted for someone who never ends up being a pro. On the other hand pro SC2 does have a place in the world and the top few players will always be revered by some. For people who don't care about the game though they're more likely to form an opinion similar to CNN. I believe gaming is a bad habit more than it is an addiction. If you could go pro at biting your nails all day it would be comparable. If anything, this shows you've been infected by some sort of pragmatism rather than that videogaming is 'bad.' I always laugh when people criticize gaming on the grounds of 'productivity' while failing to consider that productivity for productivity's sake is completely arbitrary, and is only something that people have argued for in the post-narrative era we live in. Seriously, productivity is probably the god of this generation (i.e. last 20 years). It's sad, and it's arbitrary, and I wish people would shut up about it. Agreed the same thing could be said for almost every activity depending on someones point of view. "Playing Soccer 8 hours a day is a huge waste of time if your not going to go pro". And sure it is healthy to exercise your body to a certain extent but your not going to be that much better off doing it 8 hours a day compared to 1 or 2 in terms of body health(diminishing returns). The same can be said for starcraft it is exercise for your brain and it can train your reflexes. Its completely arbitrary as you say, something that seems productive to one person seems like a waste of time to another, there is no right or wrong but unless you are training towards something most things are usually better in moderation.
|
On August 06 2012 08:11 Bippzy wrote: I think the article has much to go in storyline. Saying marineking won in 8 minutes should not be "he won in just 8 minutes" it should be more like "he executed a well disguised rush and caught his opponent off guard.
Also, go seemed like an indicative sign of addiction, but its actually BFD in the gamig community. Plus " he plays not because he wants to, but has to." seems a little too over the top. Is marinekings past weighing on him at wcg? Probably not as much as this article makes it out to be:
This article is disliked in my mind because it makes a "philosophical" question about gaming and then discusses it using MKP and statistics and government actions..it all paints the wrong picture
What are you talking about?
Rush? People who don't play video games don't know what a rush is. Nor do they understand how you disguise something.
I thought the article was extremely well-written - it brought both sides of the argument, the good and bad of gaming. I think people here focus way too much on the addiction side, which is actually, sadly, an issue (because some people are addicted to gaming - this is not necessarily good). Yes there are other non-gaming examples of bad addictions (eg. athletics) but that's not the point of this article.
|
On August 06 2012 04:51 Nos- wrote: The article is not nearly as biased as some of you guys make it out to be. I read it more as MKP's triumphant rise to the top and how his family came together for him than anything really stigmatizing gaming lol I feel like alot of the people criticizing the article simply just read the title or at the very least didnt read it from top to bottom. The coverage of MVP was all positive, the coverage of MKP was like investigative with a conclusion in the end that pro gamers arent considered addicts because they are working towards something positive and have a will to succeed. It also portrayed the difference between MVP's parents who supported his gaming and where the ones who enrolled him in starcraft academy when he wasnt getting good grades in school, they wanted him to go pro. Then there is MKP's parents who forbade him from playing games and even beat him occasionally to stop him, and how his drive to become a pro gamer made him go behind there backs and get to playing and practicing despite what his parents thought.
|
I think this perhaps might be a problem all over the world. Not just sc2 but every other game.
|
|
CNN - condescending news Network
|
This is a weird article. For one thing, it's pretty amusing that they chose to demonise the most lovable player in the entire world.
For those who didn't make it to the end, there's actually this:
After the tournament, I talked with the psychologist, Dr. Han, about gaming addiction in Korea. I described MarineKing's training habits, and his personal story. He said the number of hours and the intensity with which he approaches "StarCraft II" borders on addiction.
But there's one difference, he said. Pro gamers usually aren't addicts.
Addicts can't succeed on a higher competitive level, he said. The game takes complete control.
Pros, however, find a magical balance. They're obsessed with the game, maybe, but their playing of it isn't depressive, meandering and hopeless. They're chasing after a goal. ...but it's completely out of sync with everything else there.
It's a very confused piece of journalism. On the one hand, the message at the end is quite sympathetic, showing how MKP's parents came around and how MVP won the the WCG for KR, and suggesting that pro-gamers are different to typical addicts.
But the writer never really does away with the MKP-as-obsessive-messed-up-jittery-addict-banging-on-a-black-keyboard schtick. Very odd.
|
Guys yes they were StarCraft "schools" or "camp" that parents could unliste their children into. It happened back in Brood War days when StarCraft was still a huge thing in Korea. There were amateur houses that parents could pay the host so that their child can participate with other ones in training for Courage Tournament (to get your progaming licence in KeSpa) and up until you get picked up by one of the original 11 teams through a draft.
Since the game was at its height and that the Korean (asian culture in general) have this mentality of excelling at everything they do, parents were signing up their sons into the team house with alacrity. So it is not far fetched that the journalist mentioned the "StarCraft School" in the article.
|
|
|
|