In the world's most-wired country, Internet gaming breeds two extremes: elite "athletes" who earn fame and six figures, and addicts who literally play until they die.
http://edition.cnn.com/interactive/2012/08/tech/gaming.series/korea.html?hpt=hp_c1
Forum Index > SC2 General |
eviltomahawk
United States11135 Posts
In South Korea: Skill or Addiction? In the world's most-wired country, Internet gaming breeds two extremes: elite "athletes" who earn fame and six figures, and addicts who literally play until they die. http://edition.cnn.com/interactive/2012/08/tech/gaming.series/korea.html?hpt=hp_c1 | ||
Kontys
Finland659 Posts
.. Fucking haters. EDIT: Oh, ok. Just my initial reaction to the title. This is apparently about gaming addiction. I think they kind of misunderstood what Tasteless was saying about competitivity. Boss part Mr Tasteless, you are handsome. EDIT2: Oh there was a text part. Well, fuck you CNN. Not cool. EDIT3: CNN IS RUINING ESPORTS. Fact, but this does not need to go viral. | ||
imMUTAble787
United States680 Posts
Lol wtf? Not like I was expecting anything from any sort of major media outlet to begin with, though. | ||
Zzoram
Canada7115 Posts
| ||
Wegandi
United States2455 Posts
Tired of the corporate-Statist media and all its appendages telling us what 'acceptable' behavior is. Other than their faux-outrage and mission-creep, it would be an ok article. | ||
Medrea
10003 Posts
"I didn't realize how good he was" If you had bothered listening to him talk, or were open minded enough to ask, he would have told you how good he was so much you would ask him to shut up just for peace and quiet. Nope. Judge or Lawyer go pick one. MKP is lucky his parents eventually saw the light. eSports is the future, lets see who gets early adoption benefits. | ||
justinpal
United States3810 Posts
The match didn't last long. After setting up a base in the northeast corner of the map, MarineKing sent foot soldiers to root out his opponent's headquarters -- a glowing blue pyramid spitting out blue termites -- and blew the whole thing up before the 10-minute mark. His coach nodded approvingly and walked away. MarineKing paid no attention to the press photographers leaning over a rail to snap pictures. He was busy surfing the Internet, looking at pictures of pigtail-wearing Korean pop stars. Then he quickly moved on to another round of "StarCraft" -- not because of the competition, really. He just wanted -- or needed -- to keep playing. | ||
Noumena
United States85 Posts
They also called probes, blue termites ![]() | ||
Wegandi
United States2455 Posts
On August 05 2012 14:18 Zzoram wrote: Where are the articles about American Football addiction and how 4 players die each year from football on average, never mind the thousands of concussions that can lead to permanent brain damage? It's only an addiction when they disagree with your personal behavior. If you play a physical sport like say, football, or baseball for 5+ hours everyday, you're lauded. If you study math or science for 10+ hours a day, you're lauded. God forbid, you were a unique individual with their own likes and desires instead of some tabula rasa for them to mold to their own ends. Never ceases, does it? | ||
Itsmedudeman
United States19229 Posts
On August 05 2012 14:19 justinpal wrote: I don't think the author understands gaming culture very well. Show nested quote + The match didn't last long. After setting up a base in the northeast corner of the map, MarineKing sent foot soldiers to root out his opponent's headquarters -- a glowing blue pyramid spitting out blue termites -- and blew the whole thing up before the 10-minute mark. His coach nodded approvingly and walked away. MarineKing paid no attention to the press photographers leaning over a rail to snap pictures. He was busy surfing the Internet, looking at pictures of pigtail-wearing Korean pop stars. Then he quickly moved on to another round of "StarCraft" -- not because of the competition, really. He just wanted -- or needed -- to keep playing. Or he's just dumbing it down for his audience like any intelligent writer who knows what the hell they're doing would? Yeah, he sent marines with 1/1 upgrades for a timing attack and marine split his marines on creep sounds really good to an audience. | ||
justinpal
United States3810 Posts
On August 05 2012 14:22 Itsmedudeman wrote: Show nested quote + On August 05 2012 14:19 justinpal wrote: I don't think the author understands gaming culture very well. The match didn't last long. After setting up a base in the northeast corner of the map, MarineKing sent foot soldiers to root out his opponent's headquarters -- a glowing blue pyramid spitting out blue termites -- and blew the whole thing up before the 10-minute mark. His coach nodded approvingly and walked away. MarineKing paid no attention to the press photographers leaning over a rail to snap pictures. He was busy surfing the Internet, looking at pictures of pigtail-wearing Korean pop stars. Then he quickly moved on to another round of "StarCraft" -- not because of the competition, really. He just wanted -- or needed -- to keep playing. Or he's just dumbing it down for his audience like any intelligent writer who knows what the hell they're doing would? Yeah, he sent marines with 1/1 upgrades for a timing attack and marine split his marines on creep sounds really good to an audience. I was more referring to the article and the second part of the quote, I guess my comment wasn't clear. But, the part where they obsess over the fact that he types go or 1a2a3a4a as an indication of his addiction. I'm pretty certain there are a large number of players that do just that. | ||
Itsmedudeman
United States19229 Posts
On August 05 2012 14:21 Wegandi wrote: Show nested quote + On August 05 2012 14:18 Zzoram wrote: Where are the articles about American Football addiction and how 4 players die each year from football on average, never mind the thousands of concussions that can lead to permanent brain damage? It's only an addiction when they disagree with your personal behavior. If you play a physical sport like say, football, or baseball for 5+ hours everyday, you're lauded. If you study math or science for 10+ hours a day, you're lauded. God forbid, you were a unique individual with their own likes and desires instead of some tabula rasa for them to mold to their own ends. Never ceases, does it? ? Dumb comparison. Most people can't play physical sports as long for as long as someone can play a video game (and addicts can play all day), and someone who studies actually benefits from it? Wtf? Are we really comparing the productivity of studying math and science to that of playing a video game here? Let me know how that looks on a college application. TL is really out of touch it seems these days.. | ||
NeMeSiS3
Canada2972 Posts
There needs to really be a restructuring globally on what "news" should or should not be created, because this shit is made for the 40 year old house mom with no clue about the topic at hand, it's one thing to make a completely bias subjective article, its another to do so while not knowing anything in the process. "facepalm" On August 05 2012 14:22 Itsmedudeman wrote: Show nested quote + On August 05 2012 14:19 justinpal wrote: I don't think the author understands gaming culture very well. The match didn't last long. After setting up a base in the northeast corner of the map, MarineKing sent foot soldiers to root out his opponent's headquarters -- a glowing blue pyramid spitting out blue termites -- and blew the whole thing up before the 10-minute mark. His coach nodded approvingly and walked away. MarineKing paid no attention to the press photographers leaning over a rail to snap pictures. He was busy surfing the Internet, looking at pictures of pigtail-wearing Korean pop stars. Then he quickly moved on to another round of "StarCraft" -- not because of the competition, really. He just wanted -- or needed -- to keep playing. Or he's just dumbing it down for his audience like any intelligent writer who knows what the hell they're doing would? Yeah, he sent marines with 1/1 upgrades for a timing attack and marine split his marines on creep sounds really good to an audience. "dumbing it down" is one thing, sensationalizing the dumbing process to try and force your reader to only agree with you is another, hell the article starts with "play until they die" ... I could start throwing statistics around about which "sport" has the highest death rates per year of minor players/gamers... I can promise you that video games would be at the rock bottom, seeing as what? 5-10 people have died from "gaming" to much... ridiculous article, should have been presented by FOX | ||
Wegandi
United States2455 Posts
On August 05 2012 14:22 Itsmedudeman wrote: Show nested quote + On August 05 2012 14:19 justinpal wrote: I don't think the author understands gaming culture very well. The match didn't last long. After setting up a base in the northeast corner of the map, MarineKing sent foot soldiers to root out his opponent's headquarters -- a glowing blue pyramid spitting out blue termites -- and blew the whole thing up before the 10-minute mark. His coach nodded approvingly and walked away. MarineKing paid no attention to the press photographers leaning over a rail to snap pictures. He was busy surfing the Internet, looking at pictures of pigtail-wearing Korean pop stars. Then he quickly moved on to another round of "StarCraft" -- not because of the competition, really. He just wanted -- or needed -- to keep playing. Or he's just dumbing it down for his audience like any intelligent writer who knows what the hell they're doing would? Yeah, he sent marines with 1/1 upgrades for a timing attack and marine split his marines on creep sounds really good to an audience. If anyone has ever taken a semi-competent journalism class, they would have never written such a piss poor article. He missed more than 50% of Aristotle's appeals. Instead of saying spitting out blue termites, he could have said, producing workers called probes. Everyone knows what a worker does, and in the process you've fulfilled mythos or knowledge and provided your reader with something new and pertinent. | ||
Itsmedudeman
United States19229 Posts
On August 05 2012 14:25 justinpal wrote: Show nested quote + On August 05 2012 14:22 Itsmedudeman wrote: On August 05 2012 14:19 justinpal wrote: I don't think the author understands gaming culture very well. The match didn't last long. After setting up a base in the northeast corner of the map, MarineKing sent foot soldiers to root out his opponent's headquarters -- a glowing blue pyramid spitting out blue termites -- and blew the whole thing up before the 10-minute mark. His coach nodded approvingly and walked away. MarineKing paid no attention to the press photographers leaning over a rail to snap pictures. He was busy surfing the Internet, looking at pictures of pigtail-wearing Korean pop stars. Then he quickly moved on to another round of "StarCraft" -- not because of the competition, really. He just wanted -- or needed -- to keep playing. Or he's just dumbing it down for his audience like any intelligent writer who knows what the hell they're doing would? Yeah, he sent marines with 1/1 upgrades for a timing attack and marine split his marines on creep sounds really good to an audience. I was more referring to the article and the second part of the quote, I guess my comment wasn't clear. But, the part where they obsess over the fact that he types go or 1a2a3a4a as an indication of his addiction. I'm pretty certain there are a large number of players that do just that. No, that's clearly not what the writer meant at all. "much like a pianist would when warming up." is the phrase they used. If anything they're highlighting MKP's career and achievements as something good and productive. | ||
Psychlone
Canada90 Posts
| ||
Wegandi
United States2455 Posts
On August 05 2012 14:25 Itsmedudeman wrote: Show nested quote + On August 05 2012 14:21 Wegandi wrote: On August 05 2012 14:18 Zzoram wrote: Where are the articles about American Football addiction and how 4 players die each year from football on average, never mind the thousands of concussions that can lead to permanent brain damage? It's only an addiction when they disagree with your personal behavior. If you play a physical sport like say, football, or baseball for 5+ hours everyday, you're lauded. If you study math or science for 10+ hours a day, you're lauded. God forbid, you were a unique individual with their own likes and desires instead of some tabula rasa for them to mold to their own ends. Never ceases, does it? ? Dumb comparison. Most people can't play physical sports as long for as long as someone can play a video game (and addicts can play all day), and someone who studies actually benefits from it? Wtf? Are we really comparing the productivity of studying math and science to that of playing a video game here? Let me know how that looks on a college application. TL is really out of touch it seems these days.. No, no one is comparing the merits, benefits, or costs with one activity to another, merely the fact that their definition of addiction is subjective and almost always entails periphery activities in society, or in other words, things they don't like or understand. They then proclaim it dangerous, in some paternalistic fashion, and almost always it is for the purpose of legislating away some more of your liberties and rights. Sorry, but I don't want to live in a society that bans fun, and instead pushes 'efficiency' or 'study study study'. I'm not a fucking robot and everyone is unique. We're not a borg to mold, to shape, to push an agenda on. If someone wants to play a game for 10+ hours a day good for them! Who the hell cares if 'society' or the Government would be better off with another scientist or some shit (it actually doesn't work that way, just ask any Asian country where the restriction of freedom has stifled creativity, entrepreneurship, etc. etc.). Besides, I'm just tired of paternalism that is so rampant. From fucking seat belts, to helmets, to walking your dog on the beach, drinking a beer while taking a walk, etc. | ||
PlosionCornu
Italy814 Posts
| ||
Arghmyliver
United States1077 Posts
On August 05 2012 14:28 Wegandi wrote: Show nested quote + On August 05 2012 14:22 Itsmedudeman wrote: On August 05 2012 14:19 justinpal wrote: I don't think the author understands gaming culture very well. The match didn't last long. After setting up a base in the northeast corner of the map, MarineKing sent foot soldiers to root out his opponent's headquarters -- a glowing blue pyramid spitting out blue termites -- and blew the whole thing up before the 10-minute mark. His coach nodded approvingly and walked away. MarineKing paid no attention to the press photographers leaning over a rail to snap pictures. He was busy surfing the Internet, looking at pictures of pigtail-wearing Korean pop stars. Then he quickly moved on to another round of "StarCraft" -- not because of the competition, really. He just wanted -- or needed -- to keep playing. Or he's just dumbing it down for his audience like any intelligent writer who knows what the hell they're doing would? Yeah, he sent marines with 1/1 upgrades for a timing attack and marine split his marines on creep sounds really good to an audience. If anyone has ever taken a semi-competent journalism class, they would have never written such a piss poor article. He missed more than 50% of Aristotle's appeals. Instead of saying spitting out blue termites, he could have said, producing workers called probes. Everyone knows what a worker does, and in the process you've fulfilled mythos or knowledge and provided your reader with something new and pertinent. Yeah "spitting out blue termites" is just repugnantly biased. It's like "Death Panels" - the author knows how readers will react to certain word choices and uses the most flagrant and sensationalist one. So therefore - his article will draw disdain from those who know what they're talking about and over-crazy-concerned responses from those who think the guy spends 10 hours a day on a computer Pest Exterminator Simulator killing "blue termites." | ||
justinpal
United States3810 Posts
On August 05 2012 14:28 Itsmedudeman wrote: Show nested quote + On August 05 2012 14:25 justinpal wrote: On August 05 2012 14:22 Itsmedudeman wrote: On August 05 2012 14:19 justinpal wrote: I don't think the author understands gaming culture very well. The match didn't last long. After setting up a base in the northeast corner of the map, MarineKing sent foot soldiers to root out his opponent's headquarters -- a glowing blue pyramid spitting out blue termites -- and blew the whole thing up before the 10-minute mark. His coach nodded approvingly and walked away. MarineKing paid no attention to the press photographers leaning over a rail to snap pictures. He was busy surfing the Internet, looking at pictures of pigtail-wearing Korean pop stars. Then he quickly moved on to another round of "StarCraft" -- not because of the competition, really. He just wanted -- or needed -- to keep playing. Or he's just dumbing it down for his audience like any intelligent writer who knows what the hell they're doing would? Yeah, he sent marines with 1/1 upgrades for a timing attack and marine split his marines on creep sounds really good to an audience. I was more referring to the article and the second part of the quote, I guess my comment wasn't clear. But, the part where they obsess over the fact that he types go or 1a2a3a4a as an indication of his addiction. I'm pretty certain there are a large number of players that do just that. No, that's clearly not what the writer meant at all. "much like a pianist would when warming up." is the phrase they used. If anything they're highlighting MKP's career and achievements as something good and productive. Ah, I cbf to read the entire thing. I read it as he was so addicted that he needed his fix and was anxious to get started. I see that part you mentioned, and I disagree that they were highlighting anything. Rather the author acknowledges this is an anxious warm-up. The way it's written is meant for you to think: "Wow, he really wants to play." He stated the number of times he typed go. I know nothing about MKP and his family so it can all be true. But, I have my doubts. | ||
NeMeSiS3
Canada2972 Posts
On August 05 2012 14:33 PlosionCornu wrote: Sc2 is one of the less addictive games around in my opinion... Yeah... StarCraft 2 has what, 5 million sold games... of that maybe a few thousand play it with the hopes of going somewhere with it. StarCraft, if anything, removes any addiction except for the addition to strive and compete to better yourself. Anyone who wants something addictive would play MMO's etc... I wonder how many parents are going to read this and be so ignorant as to what is really going on that they're like "Starcraft is the bane of my son(or daughter's) existence!" I think they might want to pay more attention to kids addiction to stupidity rather than video gaming and no they do not go hand and hand^^ | ||
Vindicare605
United States16071 Posts
On August 05 2012 14:21 Wegandi wrote: Show nested quote + On August 05 2012 14:18 Zzoram wrote: Where are the articles about American Football addiction and how 4 players die each year from football on average, never mind the thousands of concussions that can lead to permanent brain damage? It's only an addiction when they disagree with your personal behavior. If you play a physical sport like say, football, or baseball for 5+ hours everyday, you're lauded. If you study math or science for 10+ hours a day, you're lauded. God forbid, you were a unique individual with their own likes and desires instead of some tabula rasa for them to mold to their own ends. Never ceases, does it? This was pretty much my argument when I first began discussing e-sports with my folks. Once upon a time, Rock music wasn't real music, shooting hoops outside, spending a lot of time drawing, collecting comic books, writing blogs, skateboarding, etc.: was a waste of time, the examples are endless of people doing what they love despite disdain from others that don't understand them and creating brand new industries and art forms that hadn't existed before and now those people are heroes. Gaming is no different. There's a rich vibrant e-sports culture that's global now that supports itself and the level of passion and excitement I've witnessed at live events are enough to change anyone's mind. The fact we're STILL at the point in society where we're willing to criticize what other people devote their time and energy to is just depressing to me. You'd think we'd have moved past it by now. At the end of the day though, I don't care if it takes CNN a long time to figure it out. I already know there's something real, worth supporting in e-sports already and if it takes a long time for the old people to figure it out to then so be it. | ||
Sinensis
United States2513 Posts
Here's to hoping they release a medication to "treat" gaming addiction. LOL | ||
Itsmedudeman
United States19229 Posts
On August 05 2012 14:35 justinpal wrote: Show nested quote + On August 05 2012 14:28 Itsmedudeman wrote: On August 05 2012 14:25 justinpal wrote: On August 05 2012 14:22 Itsmedudeman wrote: On August 05 2012 14:19 justinpal wrote: I don't think the author understands gaming culture very well. The match didn't last long. After setting up a base in the northeast corner of the map, MarineKing sent foot soldiers to root out his opponent's headquarters -- a glowing blue pyramid spitting out blue termites -- and blew the whole thing up before the 10-minute mark. His coach nodded approvingly and walked away. MarineKing paid no attention to the press photographers leaning over a rail to snap pictures. He was busy surfing the Internet, looking at pictures of pigtail-wearing Korean pop stars. Then he quickly moved on to another round of "StarCraft" -- not because of the competition, really. He just wanted -- or needed -- to keep playing. Or he's just dumbing it down for his audience like any intelligent writer who knows what the hell they're doing would? Yeah, he sent marines with 1/1 upgrades for a timing attack and marine split his marines on creep sounds really good to an audience. I was more referring to the article and the second part of the quote, I guess my comment wasn't clear. But, the part where they obsess over the fact that he types go or 1a2a3a4a as an indication of his addiction. I'm pretty certain there are a large number of players that do just that. No, that's clearly not what the writer meant at all. "much like a pianist would when warming up." is the phrase they used. If anything they're highlighting MKP's career and achievements as something good and productive. Ah, I cbf to read the entire thing. I read it as he was so addicted that he needed his fix and was anxious to get started. I see that part you mentioned, and I disagree that they were highlighting anything. Rather the author acknowledges this is an anxious warm-up. The way it's written is meant for you to think: "Wow, he really wants to play." He stated the number of times he typed go. I know nothing about MKP and his family so it can all be true. But, I have my doubts. I think people are getting the wrong idea about this article, and even though it's up to interpretation -- what I get out of it is the teeter totter that is pro gaming and addiction and a video game being able to take away from your life. This is the line that really caught my attention "Pros, however, find a magical balance. They're obsessed with the game, maybe, but their playing of it isn't depressive, meandering and hopeless. They're chasing after a goal." All in all, it was an interesting read, bias or not, and MKP's life wasn't all smilies and laughs. | ||
Medrea
10003 Posts
| ||
Heavenlee
United States966 Posts
On August 05 2012 14:33 PlosionCornu wrote: Sc2 is one of the less addictive games around in my opinion... Meh, it depends. I played for like 12 hours a couple days ago lol. It's addicting but it's an isolated type of game where the only "leveling" is getting higher on ladder. I think a lot of games like Maplestory are addicting because it's just instant gratification over and over with small little achievements, whereas the only achievement for SC2 is winning a game that can take 15 minutes and be very frustrating. | ||
Jakkerr
Netherlands2549 Posts
There's a few mistakes here and there, but if you forget those they summed up nicely how it's like being a progamer in Korea and the differences between Korean culture and Western culture. I like that the writer seems objective, maybe a little bit negative but he covers both the good and the 'bad' sides of gaming really well. | ||
Wegandi
United States2455 Posts
On August 05 2012 14:40 Vindicare605 wrote: Show nested quote + On August 05 2012 14:21 Wegandi wrote: On August 05 2012 14:18 Zzoram wrote: Where are the articles about American Football addiction and how 4 players die each year from football on average, never mind the thousands of concussions that can lead to permanent brain damage? It's only an addiction when they disagree with your personal behavior. If you play a physical sport like say, football, or baseball for 5+ hours everyday, you're lauded. If you study math or science for 10+ hours a day, you're lauded. God forbid, you were a unique individual with their own likes and desires instead of some tabula rasa for them to mold to their own ends. Never ceases, does it? This was pretty much my argument when I first began discussing e-sports with my folks. Once upon a time, Rock music wasn't real music, shooting hoops outside, spending a lot of time drawing, collecting comic books, writing blogs, skateboarding, etc.: was a waste of time, the examples are endless of people doing what they love despite disdain from others that don't understand them and creating brand new industries and art forms that hadn't existed before and now those people are heroes. Gaming is no different. There's a rich vibrant e-sports culture that's global now that supports itself and the level of passion and excitement I've witnessed at live events are enough to change anyone's mind. The fact we're STILL at the point in society where we're willing to criticize what other people devote their time and energy to is just depressing to me. You'd think we'd have moved past it by now. At the end of the day though, I don't care if it takes CNN a long time to figure it out. I already know there's something real, worth supporting in e-sports already and if it takes a long time for the old people to figure it out to then so be it. It's just funny that separated by thousands of miles, me and MKP had the exact same childhood experience. My parents also disapproved of me playing Red Alert so much, and I used to get up in the middle of the night (almost every night), and tip toe to the computer fire up the dial-up and play Red Alert until school. :p Some of the best times of my life. I actually won a crappy camera/web cam thing way back in the mid 90s from Westwood Studios for being on the top of their ladder. (Most of the top players never played on the ladder and we used to just troll it from time to time...like seriously the top 25...so bad. No one used Q, etc. :p) Now, if I only I could muster the same passion for SC2.... The good thing though, is that you can take your experiences and learn from them so you don't do the same things to your children. I fully intend to support what makes my future children happy. | ||
Secret05
United States342 Posts
| ||
TRaFFiC
Canada1448 Posts
I find it sad that Korean parents seem to only accept gaming after their son becomes famous. Certainly gaming can be an addiction if it controls your life negatively. | ||
Ansinjunger
United States2451 Posts
It's not that bad and certainly not that surprising when CNN or Fox News have a negative slant on video games. Besides, there are people who are addicted, although I don't consider it nearly as bad of an addiction as anything drug or sex related. The article does seem to get a bunch of Starcraft facts way off, and where there was a choice, a slightly more negative connotation was used, like with termites. I'm sure you can find an audience friendly word besides that. Getting actual facts correct aside, the negative bias is just feeding their audience, but at least they extend a slim door of hope. | ||
TechNoTrance
Canada1007 Posts
"go?" he wrote through an in-game chat program." Dat gamer-speak. Not a terrible article, painful at times, but don't forget sc2 is pretty damn confusing at a first look. | ||
Cocoba
Canada352 Posts
| ||
n3ac3y
United States108 Posts
On August 05 2012 14:49 Wegandi wrote: Show nested quote + On August 05 2012 14:40 Vindicare605 wrote: On August 05 2012 14:21 Wegandi wrote: On August 05 2012 14:18 Zzoram wrote: Where are the articles about American Football addiction and how 4 players die each year from football on average, never mind the thousands of concussions that can lead to permanent brain damage? It's only an addiction when they disagree with your personal behavior. If you play a physical sport like say, football, or baseball for 5+ hours everyday, you're lauded. If you study math or science for 10+ hours a day, you're lauded. God forbid, you were a unique individual with their own likes and desires instead of some tabula rasa for them to mold to their own ends. Never ceases, does it? This was pretty much my argument when I first began discussing e-sports with my folks. Once upon a time, Rock music wasn't real music, shooting hoops outside, spending a lot of time drawing, collecting comic books, writing blogs, skateboarding, etc.: was a waste of time, the examples are endless of people doing what they love despite disdain from others that don't understand them and creating brand new industries and art forms that hadn't existed before and now those people are heroes. Gaming is no different. There's a rich vibrant e-sports culture that's global now that supports itself and the level of passion and excitement I've witnessed at live events are enough to change anyone's mind. The fact we're STILL at the point in society where we're willing to criticize what other people devote their time and energy to is just depressing to me. You'd think we'd have moved past it by now. At the end of the day though, I don't care if it takes CNN a long time to figure it out. I already know there's something real, worth supporting in e-sports already and if it takes a long time for the old people to figure it out to then so be it. It's just funny that separated by thousands of miles, me and MKP had the exact same childhood experience. My parents also disapproved of me playing Red Alert so much, and I used to get up in the middle of the night (almost every night), and tip toe to the computer fire up the dial-up and play Red Alert until school. :p Some of the best times of my life. I actually won a crappy camera/web cam thing way back in the mid 90s from Westwood Studios for being on the top of their ladder. (Most of the top players never played on the ladder and we used to just troll it from time to time...like seriously the top 25...so bad. No one used Q, etc. :p) Now, if I only I could muster the same passion for SC2.... The good thing though, is that you can take your experiences and learn from them so you don't do the same things to your children. I fully intend to support what makes my future children happy. Did you ever play on that westwood beta server where you could link up to I believe it was 8 players? I remember playing this map XGems and that being my first real taste of competitive RTS. All of those player's gameplays were so refined, and for being like the age of 12 or whatever I was extremely overwhelmed but eventually started doing really well :D | ||
Rah
United States973 Posts
| ||
Kid-Fox
Canada400 Posts
It had a strong negative connotation but it wasn't as bad as I expected. | ||
BearStorm
United States795 Posts
| ||
SafeAsCheese
United States4924 Posts
Work 8-12 hours a day for your entire life on a job you probably will grow to hate and you are a | ||
Shebuha
Canada1335 Posts
I really didn't like the part where they stated how many times he said "go" and made it seem like he NEEDED to play (later saying "He just wanted -- or needed -- to keep playing"). In reality he was probably anxious/nervous and wanted to just get into the game. The first time I played a pro I was super nervous, so I can't imagine how it feels to play in WCG. lol As another guy said half way up the page - "Piss poor article." At some points, anyway. ^^^ I love the guy above me. | ||
Imagine42
United States73 Posts
It's also equally as hilarious as when from word one you know how the writer feels about this subject, throwing all form of journalism objectivity out the window. Oh, and as a final note, you cannot be addicted to a video game. Game compulsion, sure, addiction, no. Statements like He quietly unpacked his keyboard at another station and, like a swimmer cooling down in a lap pool -- or an addict looking for one more fix -- started playing the game all over again. is nothing but a ridiculous way to try to connect games to drugs and the like, and it's absolutely stupid.http://penny-arcade.com/patv/episode/game-addiction-pt.1 can probably say more about it than I ever would though. All in all, no reason to even consider the merits of an article like this. | ||
Wegandi
United States2455 Posts
On August 05 2012 15:15 n3ac3y wrote: Show nested quote + On August 05 2012 14:49 Wegandi wrote: On August 05 2012 14:40 Vindicare605 wrote: On August 05 2012 14:21 Wegandi wrote: On August 05 2012 14:18 Zzoram wrote: Where are the articles about American Football addiction and how 4 players die each year from football on average, never mind the thousands of concussions that can lead to permanent brain damage? It's only an addiction when they disagree with your personal behavior. If you play a physical sport like say, football, or baseball for 5+ hours everyday, you're lauded. If you study math or science for 10+ hours a day, you're lauded. God forbid, you were a unique individual with their own likes and desires instead of some tabula rasa for them to mold to their own ends. Never ceases, does it? This was pretty much my argument when I first began discussing e-sports with my folks. Once upon a time, Rock music wasn't real music, shooting hoops outside, spending a lot of time drawing, collecting comic books, writing blogs, skateboarding, etc.: was a waste of time, the examples are endless of people doing what they love despite disdain from others that don't understand them and creating brand new industries and art forms that hadn't existed before and now those people are heroes. Gaming is no different. There's a rich vibrant e-sports culture that's global now that supports itself and the level of passion and excitement I've witnessed at live events are enough to change anyone's mind. The fact we're STILL at the point in society where we're willing to criticize what other people devote their time and energy to is just depressing to me. You'd think we'd have moved past it by now. At the end of the day though, I don't care if it takes CNN a long time to figure it out. I already know there's something real, worth supporting in e-sports already and if it takes a long time for the old people to figure it out to then so be it. It's just funny that separated by thousands of miles, me and MKP had the exact same childhood experience. My parents also disapproved of me playing Red Alert so much, and I used to get up in the middle of the night (almost every night), and tip toe to the computer fire up the dial-up and play Red Alert until school. :p Some of the best times of my life. I actually won a crappy camera/web cam thing way back in the mid 90s from Westwood Studios for being on the top of their ladder. (Most of the top players never played on the ladder and we used to just troll it from time to time...like seriously the top 25...so bad. No one used Q, etc. :p) Now, if I only I could muster the same passion for SC2.... The good thing though, is that you can take your experiences and learn from them so you don't do the same things to your children. I fully intend to support what makes my future children happy. Did you ever play on that westwood beta server where you could link up to I believe it was 8 players? I remember playing this map XGems and that being my first real taste of competitive RTS. All of those player's gameplays were so refined, and for being like the age of 12 or whatever I was extremely overwhelmed but eventually started doing really well :D Nope. I'm just an old school WOL guy who played Cases Ladder and the gaming community/league Global Domination with folks like DOJACLICK, Nezz, and Dadogenij. HJK6 is probably the greatest map ever made :p Yeah, my first real taste of competitive RTS was in Global Domination. My first 200 or so games I think I won like ten...Those were the days. I started when I was 9 or so and played until I was about 15. I really miss the old Westwood.... | ||
cpc
Australia126 Posts
Just before the 19-minute mark, Kas ambushed MarineKing on his side of the city. A flurry of insect-like alien creatures swarmed his human base and started pecking away at it. Last time I checked Kas wasn't a zerg player. | ||
schmitty9800
United States390 Posts
On August 05 2012 15:46 cpc wrote: Possibly not as bad as I expected but I don't think much of it particularly when some of it is plain wrong. Show nested quote + Just before the 19-minute mark, Kas ambushed MarineKing on his side of the city. A flurry of insect-like alien creatures swarmed his human base and started pecking away at it. Last time I checked Kas wasn't a zerg player. The reporter probably just doesn't know what the units are. Instead of flaming him on a public forum, you could outreach, email the dude, and educate. Which do you think is going to make gaming more well regarded overall? And I'm more speaking towards others who have flamed worse. He was probably using a marauder drop, they look pretty damn alien. | ||
Skiblet
South Africa206 Posts
| ||
SpeaKEaSY
United States1070 Posts
![]() Don't tell me I was the only one that saw this... | ||
Wegandi
United States2455 Posts
On August 05 2012 15:49 schmitty9800 wrote: Show nested quote + On August 05 2012 15:46 cpc wrote: Possibly not as bad as I expected but I don't think much of it particularly when some of it is plain wrong. Just before the 19-minute mark, Kas ambushed MarineKing on his side of the city. A flurry of insect-like alien creatures swarmed his human base and started pecking away at it. Last time I checked Kas wasn't a zerg player. The reporter probably just doesn't know what the units are. Instead of flaming him on a public forum, you could outreach, email the dude, and educate. Which do you think is going to make gaming more well regarded overall? And I'm more speaking towards others who have flamed worse. He was probably using a marauder drop, they look pretty damn alien. Last I checked, it is the journalist's job to research what their article is supposed to be about...It isn't like the research for this article was out of reach, or insurmountable. Journalism these days... | ||
Kamwah
United Kingdom724 Posts
| ||
ReturnStroke
United States801 Posts
Addicts can't succeed on a higher competitive level, he said. The game takes complete control." Seems better than a lot of mainstream articles on pro-gaming. They point out that most pros aren't actually addicts, they are separate from the maple story kids. They are addicted to their craft in the same way professional athletes or successful scholars are. | ||
Aerisky
United States12129 Posts
| ||
Vestrel
Canada271 Posts
Is a little research so much to ask for? | ||
Shebuha
Canada1335 Posts
On August 05 2012 16:02 ReturnStroke wrote: The best quote in my opinion: "But there's one difference, he said. Pro gamers usually aren't addicts. Addicts can't succeed on a higher competitive level, he said. The game takes complete control." Jesus, it makes it sound like they're... what's the phrase.. the article said it.. "Junkes looking for a fix." lol | ||
GhandiEAGLE
United States20754 Posts
I laughed when they called Kas a zerg player, though xD | ||
Bagration
United States18282 Posts
They were mean to Darkforce though. So fuck em. | ||
Mysticesper
United States1183 Posts
On August 05 2012 14:27 NeMeSiS3 wrote: Possibly the worst thing I've ever read, it felt like the writer was on another fucking planet, I'm going to go write a piece for CNN about athletic addition because apparently striving to improve on a difficult task can equate to playing MAPLE STORY? WHAT THE FUCK. Wait wait wait, I'd fall into the same trap of not knowing a single fucking thing about it. There needs to really be a restructuring globally on what "news" should or should not be created, because this shit is made for the 40 year old house mom with no clue about the topic at hand, it's one thing to make a completely bias subjective article, its another to do so while not knowing anything in the process. "facepalm" Show nested quote + On August 05 2012 14:22 Itsmedudeman wrote: On August 05 2012 14:19 justinpal wrote: I don't think the author understands gaming culture very well. The match didn't last long. After setting up a base in the northeast corner of the map, MarineKing sent foot soldiers to root out his opponent's headquarters -- a glowing blue pyramid spitting out blue termites -- and blew the whole thing up before the 10-minute mark. His coach nodded approvingly and walked away. MarineKing paid no attention to the press photographers leaning over a rail to snap pictures. He was busy surfing the Internet, looking at pictures of pigtail-wearing Korean pop stars. Then he quickly moved on to another round of "StarCraft" -- not because of the competition, really. He just wanted -- or needed -- to keep playing. Or he's just dumbing it down for his audience like any intelligent writer who knows what the hell they're doing would? Yeah, he sent marines with 1/1 upgrades for a timing attack and marine split his marines on creep sounds really good to an audience. "dumbing it down" is one thing, sensationalizing the dumbing process to try and force your reader to only agree with you is another, hell the article starts with "play until they die" ... I could start throwing statistics around about which "sport" has the highest death rates per year of minor players/gamers... I can promise you that video games would be at the rock bottom, seeing as what? 5-10 people have died from "gaming" to much... ridiculous article, should have been presented by FOX I'm always amused when people complain about Fox, when CNN, NBC, MSNBC, etc are just as bad. | ||
ReturnStroke
United States801 Posts
On August 05 2012 16:07 Shebuha wrote: Show nested quote + On August 05 2012 16:02 ReturnStroke wrote: The best quote in my opinion: "But there's one difference, he said. Pro gamers usually aren't addicts. Addicts can't succeed on a higher competitive level, he said. The game takes complete control." Jesus, it makes it sound like they're... what's the phrase.. the article said it.. "Junkes looking for a fix." lol Indeed. Which kind of makes the quote I posted feel a bit out of place in the article. But it's there. I'm glad, too. | ||
Wegandi
United States2455 Posts
On August 05 2012 16:08 Mysticesper wrote: Show nested quote + On August 05 2012 14:27 NeMeSiS3 wrote: Possibly the worst thing I've ever read, it felt like the writer was on another fucking planet, I'm going to go write a piece for CNN about athletic addition because apparently striving to improve on a difficult task can equate to playing MAPLE STORY? WHAT THE FUCK. Wait wait wait, I'd fall into the same trap of not knowing a single fucking thing about it. There needs to really be a restructuring globally on what "news" should or should not be created, because this shit is made for the 40 year old house mom with no clue about the topic at hand, it's one thing to make a completely bias subjective article, its another to do so while not knowing anything in the process. "facepalm" On August 05 2012 14:22 Itsmedudeman wrote: On August 05 2012 14:19 justinpal wrote: I don't think the author understands gaming culture very well. The match didn't last long. After setting up a base in the northeast corner of the map, MarineKing sent foot soldiers to root out his opponent's headquarters -- a glowing blue pyramid spitting out blue termites -- and blew the whole thing up before the 10-minute mark. His coach nodded approvingly and walked away. MarineKing paid no attention to the press photographers leaning over a rail to snap pictures. He was busy surfing the Internet, looking at pictures of pigtail-wearing Korean pop stars. Then he quickly moved on to another round of "StarCraft" -- not because of the competition, really. He just wanted -- or needed -- to keep playing. Or he's just dumbing it down for his audience like any intelligent writer who knows what the hell they're doing would? Yeah, he sent marines with 1/1 upgrades for a timing attack and marine split his marines on creep sounds really good to an audience. "dumbing it down" is one thing, sensationalizing the dumbing process to try and force your reader to only agree with you is another, hell the article starts with "play until they die" ... I could start throwing statistics around about which "sport" has the highest death rates per year of minor players/gamers... I can promise you that video games would be at the rock bottom, seeing as what? 5-10 people have died from "gaming" to much... ridiculous article, should have been presented by FOX I'm always amused when people complain about Fox, when CNN, NBC, MSNBC, etc are just as bad. CNN is one of the worst at peddling lies for more wars. I can't count the number it's been so many from photoshopping pictures, to outright making sets, etc. Oy-vei. | ||
Probe1
United States17920 Posts
| ||
imMUTAble787
United States680 Posts
On August 05 2012 16:17 Wegandi wrote: Show nested quote + On August 05 2012 16:08 Mysticesper wrote: On August 05 2012 14:27 NeMeSiS3 wrote: Possibly the worst thing I've ever read, it felt like the writer was on another fucking planet, I'm going to go write a piece for CNN about athletic addition because apparently striving to improve on a difficult task can equate to playing MAPLE STORY? WHAT THE FUCK. Wait wait wait, I'd fall into the same trap of not knowing a single fucking thing about it. There needs to really be a restructuring globally on what "news" should or should not be created, because this shit is made for the 40 year old house mom with no clue about the topic at hand, it's one thing to make a completely bias subjective article, its another to do so while not knowing anything in the process. "facepalm" On August 05 2012 14:22 Itsmedudeman wrote: On August 05 2012 14:19 justinpal wrote: I don't think the author understands gaming culture very well. The match didn't last long. After setting up a base in the northeast corner of the map, MarineKing sent foot soldiers to root out his opponent's headquarters -- a glowing blue pyramid spitting out blue termites -- and blew the whole thing up before the 10-minute mark. His coach nodded approvingly and walked away. MarineKing paid no attention to the press photographers leaning over a rail to snap pictures. He was busy surfing the Internet, looking at pictures of pigtail-wearing Korean pop stars. Then he quickly moved on to another round of "StarCraft" -- not because of the competition, really. He just wanted -- or needed -- to keep playing. Or he's just dumbing it down for his audience like any intelligent writer who knows what the hell they're doing would? Yeah, he sent marines with 1/1 upgrades for a timing attack and marine split his marines on creep sounds really good to an audience. "dumbing it down" is one thing, sensationalizing the dumbing process to try and force your reader to only agree with you is another, hell the article starts with "play until they die" ... I could start throwing statistics around about which "sport" has the highest death rates per year of minor players/gamers... I can promise you that video games would be at the rock bottom, seeing as what? 5-10 people have died from "gaming" to much... ridiculous article, should have been presented by FOX I'm always amused when people complain about Fox, when CNN, NBC, MSNBC, etc are just as bad. CNN is one of the worst at peddling lies for more wars. I can't count the number it's been so many from photoshopping pictures, to outright making sets, etc. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jTWY14eyMFg&feature=related Oy-vei. That's a classic. The most blatant instance of something like this happen in recent times would have to be the media outlets using photos from Iraq or wherever it was and saying it was civilian mass graves in Syria. I don't understand the desire to have 'mainstream' acceptance or coverage at all. I guess people don't understand the strings that are attached to it. I would much rather the 'mainstream' come to us than us go to the 'mainstream.' | ||
Jakkerr
Netherlands2549 Posts
For a CNN article that a ton of people will read that don't know anything about Starcraft I don't think it's that bad. There have been articles that are 100% negative about professional gaming etc, this article just raises understandable questions and tries to answer some of them. All in all it really isn't that bad for a major newschannel apart from some questionable comparisons. | ||
NeMeSiS3
Canada2972 Posts
On August 05 2012 16:24 Probe1 wrote: Not singling out anyone in particular, but the over reaction hate towards CNN for a article that doesn't capture eSports 100% perfectly in your own eyes? That's just about as bad as what you think they're doing by comparing Maple Story and SC. No no no you have it wrong, It's not because they didn't get it 100%, its because they got it at around 3%... Journalism is researching and knowing your topic, you're suppose to be objective. People are pissed because the writer knew exactly what his story was suppose to be and what it was suppose to look like before he began "researching" and I use that term lightly. Also your comparison made no sense, how is the comparison between apples and oranges equivalent to plain bad journalism? | ||
Talin
Montenegro10532 Posts
You can't reasonably expect everyone to look at games as a super-exciting next generation athletic discipline and the best thing since sliced bread as the various esports-based media try to present it (which they have to do in order to actually sell it). From an outsider perspective, this is a fairly reasonable way of looking at the phenomenon. | ||
flyingteapot
United States11 Posts
On August 05 2012 14:35 justinpal wrote: Show nested quote + On August 05 2012 14:28 Itsmedudeman wrote: On August 05 2012 14:25 justinpal wrote: On August 05 2012 14:22 Itsmedudeman wrote: On August 05 2012 14:19 justinpal wrote: I don't think the author understands gaming culture very well. The match didn't last long. After setting up a base in the northeast corner of the map, MarineKing sent foot soldiers to root out his opponent's headquarters -- a glowing blue pyramid spitting out blue termites -- and blew the whole thing up before the 10-minute mark. His coach nodded approvingly and walked away. MarineKing paid no attention to the press photographers leaning over a rail to snap pictures. He was busy surfing the Internet, looking at pictures of pigtail-wearing Korean pop stars. Then he quickly moved on to another round of "StarCraft" -- not because of the competition, really. He just wanted -- or needed -- to keep playing. Or he's just dumbing it down for his audience like any intelligent writer who knows what the hell they're doing would? Yeah, he sent marines with 1/1 upgrades for a timing attack and marine split his marines on creep sounds really good to an audience. I was more referring to the article and the second part of the quote, I guess my comment wasn't clear. But, the part where they obsess over the fact that he types go or 1a2a3a4a as an indication of his addiction. I'm pretty certain there are a large number of players that do just that. No, that's clearly not what the writer meant at all. "much like a pianist would when warming up." is the phrase they used. If anything they're highlighting MKP's career and achievements as something good and productive. Ah, I cbf to read the entire thing. I read it as he was so addicted that he needed his fix and was anxious to get started. I see that part you mentioned, and I disagree that they were highlighting anything. Rather the author acknowledges this is an anxious warm-up. The way it's written is meant for you to think: "Wow, he really wants to play." He stated the number of times he typed go. I know nothing about MKP and his family so it can all be true. But, I have my doubts. And the author never actually gives the timeframe in which he typed go 59 times, It could have been 30 seconds or 10 minutes. I guess articles like this will exist when there is an outsider looking in and writing about it for people who are also outsiders | ||
Bodzilla
Australia472 Posts
HEY KIDS GET OFF MY LAWN | ||
Imagine42
United States73 Posts
On August 05 2012 16:37 Talin wrote: The article wasn't that bad at all honestly. You can't reasonably expect everyone to look at games as a super-exciting next generation athletic discipline and the best thing since sliced bread as the various esports-based media try to present it (which they have to do in order to actually sell it). From an outsider perspective, this is a fairly reasonable way of looking at the phenomenon. No it's not... As long as articles like this keep on portraying gaming as nothing but just another form of shooting up heroin, gaming won't ever be accepted as something good. | ||
anrimayu
United States875 Posts
| ||
SRBNikola
Serbia191 Posts
| ||
paintfive
785 Posts
"Gaming's Dark Side" "Addicts who literally play till until they die" this is gold : "MKP... cared more about proving to his parents, and to himself, that he was not addicted to the video game" LOL https://twitter.com/jdsutter <- joke of a writer it's disgusting because 90% of the story sounds like it was pulled completely out of his ass. | ||
legaton
France1763 Posts
| ||
Jakkerr
Netherlands2549 Posts
On August 05 2012 16:46 Imagine42 wrote: Show nested quote + On August 05 2012 16:37 Talin wrote: The article wasn't that bad at all honestly. You can't reasonably expect everyone to look at games as a super-exciting next generation athletic discipline and the best thing since sliced bread as the various esports-based media try to present it (which they have to do in order to actually sell it). From an outsider perspective, this is a fairly reasonable way of looking at the phenomenon. No it's not... As long as articles like this keep on portraying gaming as nothing but just another form of shooting up heroin, gaming won't ever be accepted as something good. If that's the message you got from the article I would suggest you read it again. Also, the writer specifically states the 'dark' and 'light' side of gaming which obviously do exist. In Korea game addiction is actually a serious problem though, guess why there's entire clinics dedicated to it. Any1 that doesn't know much about E-sports and even most people that do will agree that playing videogames for 10-14 hours per day isn't healthy for any1 and pro's are only able to keep up that schedule because of the teamhouse environment and mandatory physical excercise. But some random kid sitting alone in his room the entire day playing random games or trying to become pro is pretty fked up for your health. | ||
Thrombozyt
Germany1269 Posts
Just before the 19-minute mark, Kas ambushed MarineKing on his side of the city. A flurry of insect-like alien creatures swarmed his human base and started pecking away at it. MarineKing couldn't recover. His base exploded. The only beef I have is that this article reads a lot like someone looking down on gaming and explaining his disdain.. obviously not paying attention to details... | ||
IshinShishi
Japan6156 Posts
On August 05 2012 14:25 Itsmedudeman wrote: Show nested quote + On August 05 2012 14:21 Wegandi wrote: On August 05 2012 14:18 Zzoram wrote: Where are the articles about American Football addiction and how 4 players die each year from football on average, never mind the thousands of concussions that can lead to permanent brain damage? It's only an addiction when they disagree with your personal behavior. If you play a physical sport like say, football, or baseball for 5+ hours everyday, you're lauded. If you study math or science for 10+ hours a day, you're lauded. God forbid, you were a unique individual with their own likes and desires instead of some tabula rasa for them to mold to their own ends. Never ceases, does it? ? Dumb comparison. Most people can't play physical sports as long for as long as someone can play a video game (and addicts can play all day), and someone who studies actually benefits from it? Wtf? Are we really comparing the productivity of studying math and science to that of playing a video game here? Let me know how that looks on a college application. TL is really out of touch it seems these days.. 1-Just because the human body has physical limitations it doesn't impede people from spending their off time thinking about their sport or essentially dedicating every waking hour to things that are related to it. 2-Actually, I have an example of "addiction" to studying right here in my home, my father hasn't worked or put even a dime inside the house for roughly 15+ years and kept studying math and a lot of other stuff for long periods, every single day, without ever trying to apply it to anything useful whatsoever, anything and everything can be an addiction.Bad arguments debunked, send in the next ones. | ||
Talin
Montenegro10532 Posts
On August 05 2012 16:46 Imagine42 wrote: Show nested quote + On August 05 2012 16:37 Talin wrote: The article wasn't that bad at all honestly. You can't reasonably expect everyone to look at games as a super-exciting next generation athletic discipline and the best thing since sliced bread as the various esports-based media try to present it (which they have to do in order to actually sell it). From an outsider perspective, this is a fairly reasonable way of looking at the phenomenon. No it's not... As long as articles like this keep on portraying gaming as nothing but just another form of shooting up heroin, gaming won't ever be accepted as something good. That isn't really what the article does at all. It's fairly open-ended and doesn't pass the final verdict one way or the other, but illustrates both sides of progaming - mass gaming bordering on addiction on one hand, and personal accomplishment, fame and financial success on the other. Second, you're implying that mass gaming needs to be accepted as "something good", whereas it really doesn't. It is not good. Arguably it's not bad either. It's just something that certain people enjoy. That doesn't mean it needs to be accepted and respected by everyone, especially when there are so many gray areas and extreme cases. | ||
![]()
TheEmulator
28090 Posts
On August 05 2012 17:50 IshinShishi wrote: Show nested quote + On August 05 2012 14:25 Itsmedudeman wrote: On August 05 2012 14:21 Wegandi wrote: On August 05 2012 14:18 Zzoram wrote: Where are the articles about American Football addiction and how 4 players die each year from football on average, never mind the thousands of concussions that can lead to permanent brain damage? It's only an addiction when they disagree with your personal behavior. If you play a physical sport like say, football, or baseball for 5+ hours everyday, you're lauded. If you study math or science for 10+ hours a day, you're lauded. God forbid, you were a unique individual with their own likes and desires instead of some tabula rasa for them to mold to their own ends. Never ceases, does it? ? Dumb comparison. Most people can't play physical sports as long for as long as someone can play a video game (and addicts can play all day), and someone who studies actually benefits from it? Wtf? Are we really comparing the productivity of studying math and science to that of playing a video game here? Let me know how that looks on a college application. TL is really out of touch it seems these days.. 1-Just because the human body has physical limitations it doesn't impede people from spending their off time thinking about their sport or essentially dedicating every waking hour to things that are related to it. 2-Actually, I have an example of "addiction" to studying right here in my home, my father hasn't worked or put even a dime inside the house for roughly 15+ years and kept studying math and a lot of other stuff for long periods, every single day, without ever trying to apply it to anything useful whatsoever, anything and everything can be an addiction.Bad arguments debunked, send in the next ones. Addiction to studying math? Glad I don't have that one. | ||
IMABUNNEH
United Kingdom1062 Posts
| ||
firehand101
Australia3152 Posts
Now try playing starcraft, and you are completely frustrated at how the mechanics work. It really takes a conscious effort to keep playing and improving to be better than you are now. This has a lot less chance to cause an addiction... Taking this into account, do kids that constantly play this game really get addicted? Soccer in the slums of Brazil is seen as the only way out; to escape their harsh reality and go on to stardom and fame. In South Korea, the education is unbelievably hard and many fail to make the jobs and careers they want, and so starcraft is all they have left. Kids may realise this from a young age and try to play as much as they can, hoping that they too can make it big just like their idols Boxer, Nada and so on. ....or, you know,,, they might just play it because its fun ![]() | ||
lem0ncake
England85 Posts
| ||
Kyrillion
Russian Federation748 Posts
2-Actually, I have an example of "addiction" to studying right here in my home, my father hasn't worked or put even a dime inside the house for roughly 15+ years and kept studying math and a lot of other stuff for long periods, every single day, without ever trying to apply it to anything useful whatsoever, anything and everything can be an addiction.Bad arguments debunked, send in the next ones. Your father must be awesome. | ||
SoniC_eu
Denmark1008 Posts
| ||
firehand101
Australia3152 Posts
On August 05 2012 18:11 lem0ncake wrote: Fucking mainstream news always sensationalising things just for page hits and more ad revenue. Makes me sick. CNN are as bad as FOX News now. hey...don't go too far | ||
Frex
Finland888 Posts
It seems that the article's main goal is to make gaming look bad. It's no wonder that there is this certain stigma attached to spending time with computers when even media tries to make it look bad. | ||
IMABUNNEH
United Kingdom1062 Posts
Many of the high-profile matches at the World Cyber Games are played on stage in front of a live audience. Players sit in soundproof cubes so they don't hear the game's three Korean announcers, who sit at a cafeteria table yelling about whose army is advancing and who is about to get ambushed. The announcers wear white lab coats and glasses, giving them the air of scientists. One is a dead ringer for Dr. Bunsen, Beaker's sidekick on "The Muppet Show." The match didn't last long. After setting up a base in the northeast corner of the map, MarineKing sent foot soldiers to root out his opponent's headquarters -- a glowing blue pyramid spitting out blue termites -- and blew the whole thing up before the 10-minute mark. His coach nodded approvingly and walked away. MarineKing paid no attention to the press photographers leaning over a rail to snap pictures. He would face a relatively unknown Ukrainian player named Kas. Just before the 19-minute mark, Kas ambushed MarineKing on his side of the city. A flurry of insect-like alien creatures swarmed his human base and started pecking away at it. That unknown Kas and his arrmy of pecking aliens. | ||
RolleMcKnolle
Germany1054 Posts
| ||
Kyuki
Sweden1867 Posts
No one would claim that working out 8 hours a day to become a olympic champion or the likes is an addiction, and would rather praise he/she for their efforts. So, I'll chim in and say FU CNN, but thanks for the exposure! | ||
LolitsPing
United States285 Posts
Kas and Moonglade as unknown... -shiver- But this article does bring out a point. What is the line of addiction in progaming? it's simple, but the article never gets around to the fact of losing. In SC2, and at the pro level, you lose and you get annoyed by it (examples include all the ladder rage). That's why competitive e-sports can't be addicting games and people are addicted to games where there is no proper sense of competition (like MapleStory and MMORPGs), as Tasteless said. To me, e-sports is similar to a regular sport. Like Cross Country (that I run), you train year round, with a few people, focusing on a particular race that you want to excel at, and you are driven by the will to win rather than the need to run. Same thing applies to progaming. I honestly don't see how much of a difference there is. However with addiction, you keep playing because of a need to play the game, not because you want to win or anything. Okay, enough of me letting steam out when I defend esports. | ||
Rabiator
Germany3948 Posts
On August 05 2012 14:14 Kontys wrote: Skill or Addiction? .. Fucking haters. EDIT: Oh, ok. Just my initial reaction to the title. This is apparently about gaming addiction. I think they kind of misunderstood what Tasteless was saying about competitivity. Boss part Mr Tasteless, you are handsome. EDIT2: Oh there was a text part. Well, fuck you CNN. Not cool. EDIT3: CNN IS RUINING ESPORTS. Fact, but this does not need to go viral. Oh c'mon and think. Do you really think that eSports is as valid as "real sports"? Sure it is entertaining to watch pro players play their games and to play yourself, BUT did you think about the consequences of eSports for their participants? Take any korean kid from the B-team (and there should be a lot of them) and now tell me which useful things playing Starcraft has taught them for their future life? Which skill did they gain? I cant really see anything, because clicking fast isnt something terribly useful. So (in Starcraft terms): What do you transition into after spending 4-5 years semi-not-so-successful with playing a computer game? Thats the whole problem of eSports. The top pros will have made enough money and fame to support them and give them viable alternatives within the industry, but the spots there are VERY LIMITED and are occupied for much longer than a pro gamer career. There is no semi-usefulness for those not-top-players in other professions as there is in real sports. I know a guy who played football in 4th league (and he wasnt really an amateur during the time) and he is now a teacher with sports as one of his classes. ESports has no such transition and thus it is good if it doesnt grow too big. The years of 16-24 are very important for a human, because that is the time when you are able to learn new things easy. After that it will become harder and "wasting it" on a "trivial game" (which wont help you in your later 40-60 years) isnt a wise thing to do. ---- Computer games - as a whole - are entertaining to play, but as always there is a limit to when it becomes a bad thing. There was a guy 500 years ago who nailed that perfectly: Paracelsus (born Philippus Aureolus Theophrastus Bombastus von Hohenheim, 11 November or 17 December 1493 – 24 September 1541) "All things are poison, and nothing is without poison; only the dose permits something not to be poisonous." This is one of the major pieces of wisdom which a human has ever come up with and it applies to EVERYTHING IN LIFE. So dont be a spoiled four year old who starts to cry when mommy calls him home from the sandbox and think about eSports rationally and calmly. | ||
branflakes14
2082 Posts
| ||
Kyuki
Sweden1867 Posts
Fuck that shit. Also there is much to be learned from playing games in general, both motorically, mentally, logically and from a pure knowledge perspective. | ||
wcLLg
United States281 Posts
I am just going to leave this here. | ||
Frex
Finland888 Posts
On August 05 2012 18:28 Rabiator wrote: Show nested quote + On August 05 2012 14:14 Kontys wrote: Skill or Addiction? .. Fucking haters. EDIT: Oh, ok. Just my initial reaction to the title. This is apparently about gaming addiction. I think they kind of misunderstood what Tasteless was saying about competitivity. Boss part Mr Tasteless, you are handsome. EDIT2: Oh there was a text part. Well, fuck you CNN. Not cool. EDIT3: CNN IS RUINING ESPORTS. Fact, but this does not need to go viral. Oh c'mon and think. Do you really think that eSports is as valid as "real sports"? Sure it is entertaining to watch pro players play their games and to play yourself, BUT did you think about the consequences of eSports for their participants? Take any korean kid from the B-team (and there should be a lot of them) and now tell me which useful things playing Starcraft has taught them for their future life? Which skill did they gain? I cant really see anything, because clicking fast isnt something terribly useful. So (in Starcraft terms): What do you transition into after spending 4-5 years semi-not-so-successful with playing a computer game? Thats the whole problem of eSports. The top pros will have made enough money and fame to support them and give them viable alternatives within the industry, but the spots there are VERY LIMITED and are occupied for much longer than a pro gamer career. There is no semi-usefulness for those not-top-players in other professions as there is in real sports. I know a guy who played football in 4th league (and he wasnt really an amateur during the time) and he is now a teacher with sports as one of his classes. ESports has no such transition and thus it is good if it doesnt grow too big. The years of 16-24 are very important for a human, because that is the time when you are able to learn new things easy. After that it will become harder and "wasting it" on a "trivial game" (which wont help you in your later 40-60 years) isnt a wise thing to do. ---- Computer games - as a whole - are entertaining to play, but as always there is a limit to when it becomes a bad thing. There was a guy 500 years ago who nailed that perfectly: Paracelsus (born Philippus Aureolus Theophrastus Bombastus von Hohenheim, 11 November or 17 December 1493 – 24 September 1541) Show nested quote + "All things are poison, and nothing is without poison; only the dose permits something not to be poisonous." This is one of the major pieces of wisdom which a human has ever come up with and it applies to EVERYTHING IN LIFE. So dont be a spoiled four year old who starts to cry when mommy calls him home from the sandbox and think about eSports rationally and calmly. After 4-5 years you can become caster, there are many opportunities in gaming industry, you see it's pretty large. There is more than playing as pro in the gaming industry. Did you even watch the videos on the article? It makes your "I know a guy who played football in 4th league (and he wasnt really an amateur during the time) and he is now a teacher with sports as one of his classes. ESports has no such transition and thus it is good if it doesnt grow too big. " statement ridiculous. Did you see that MVP coach was ex-progamer? Also don't use arguments like "So dont be a spoiled four year old who starts to cry when mommy calls him home from the sandbox and think about eSports rationally and calmly." you make yourself look like a fool. | ||
Rabiator
Germany3948 Posts
On August 05 2012 18:29 branflakes14 wrote: Necessity breeds addiction. If kids had something else worthwhile to do they wouldn't be playing video games for 40 hours straight. Thats stupid. Necessity isnt needed to breed an addiction and for computer games it is the EASY WAY to spend some enjoyable time, because you dont have to move a bit. You dont even have to make a phone call to organize an evening with your friends, you just turn on the computer and log in and whoever is there is there and who isnt isnt. You can play with anyone from anywhere and the world is big enough so that there will always be someone to play with. With "real life friends" you dont have that same easy way of entertainment, because you have to organize meeting them and then one of them doesnt have time and after organizing it you have to meet somewhere ... so computer games is a MUCH EASIER way of "meeting". The bad part about computer games is that although it is a form of communication it is also a BAD QUALITY. The reason for me calling it bad quality is that it only involves very few of your senses and a face-to-face meeting always involves the highest amount of your senses. A quick example is sarcasm. In a 1-sense-meeting (either voicechat or text only on a forum like this) you might not know if someone is using sarcasm or is just stupid and honestly meaning what he says. In a face-to-face meeting you also have body language to figure that one out. | ||
Rabiator
Germany3948 Posts
On August 05 2012 18:40 Rokoz wrote: Show nested quote + On August 05 2012 18:28 Rabiator wrote: On August 05 2012 14:14 Kontys wrote: Skill or Addiction? .. Fucking haters. EDIT: Oh, ok. Just my initial reaction to the title. This is apparently about gaming addiction. I think they kind of misunderstood what Tasteless was saying about competitivity. Boss part Mr Tasteless, you are handsome. EDIT2: Oh there was a text part. Well, fuck you CNN. Not cool. EDIT3: CNN IS RUINING ESPORTS. Fact, but this does not need to go viral. Oh c'mon and think. Do you really think that eSports is as valid as "real sports"? Sure it is entertaining to watch pro players play their games and to play yourself, BUT did you think about the consequences of eSports for their participants? Take any korean kid from the B-team (and there should be a lot of them) and now tell me which useful things playing Starcraft has taught them for their future life? Which skill did they gain? I cant really see anything, because clicking fast isnt something terribly useful. So (in Starcraft terms): What do you transition into after spending 4-5 years semi-not-so-successful with playing a computer game? Thats the whole problem of eSports. The top pros will have made enough money and fame to support them and give them viable alternatives within the industry, but the spots there are VERY LIMITED and are occupied for much longer than a pro gamer career. There is no semi-usefulness for those not-top-players in other professions as there is in real sports. I know a guy who played football in 4th league (and he wasnt really an amateur during the time) and he is now a teacher with sports as one of his classes. ESports has no such transition and thus it is good if it doesnt grow too big. The years of 16-24 are very important for a human, because that is the time when you are able to learn new things easy. After that it will become harder and "wasting it" on a "trivial game" (which wont help you in your later 40-60 years) isnt a wise thing to do. ---- Computer games - as a whole - are entertaining to play, but as always there is a limit to when it becomes a bad thing. There was a guy 500 years ago who nailed that perfectly: Paracelsus (born Philippus Aureolus Theophrastus Bombastus von Hohenheim, 11 November or 17 December 1493 – 24 September 1541) "All things are poison, and nothing is without poison; only the dose permits something not to be poisonous." This is one of the major pieces of wisdom which a human has ever come up with and it applies to EVERYTHING IN LIFE. So dont be a spoiled four year old who starts to cry when mommy calls him home from the sandbox and think about eSports rationally and calmly. After 4-5 years you can become caster, there are many opportunities in gaming industry, you see it's pretty large. There is more than playing as pro in the gaming industry. Did you even watch the videos on the article? It makes your "I know a guy who played football in 4th league (and he wasnt really an amateur during the time) and he is now a teacher with sports as one of his classes. ESports has no such transition and thus it is good if it doesnt grow too big. " statement ridiculous. Did you see that MVP coach was ex-progamer? Also don't use arguments like "So dont be a spoiled four year old who starts to cry when mommy calls him home from the sandbox and think about eSports rationally and calmly." you make yourself look like a fool. Do you really think that there are spots as a caster for people from the B-team? Really? Enough to sustain someone? Be reasonable. There wont be enough spots for the guys from the A-team ... and there are more B-teamers than them. And even if the ex-pro-players have the knowledge they certainly arent guaranteed to have to verbal skills to be able to cast well enough. Playing Starcraft didnt help them with that in any way. GSL, MLG, IPL and maybe Dreamhack / Assembly are the few big events which will pay enough for a caster to at least sustain them for a little while, but beyond that there arent any events which pays enough. These events are casted by a few people (maybe 20), but there are LOTS more players than that and I dont see Tastosis making room for anyone else in the near future. | ||
Andre
Slovenia3523 Posts
On August 05 2012 18:41 Rabiator wrote: Show nested quote + On August 05 2012 18:40 Rokoz wrote: On August 05 2012 18:28 Rabiator wrote: On August 05 2012 14:14 Kontys wrote: Skill or Addiction? .. Fucking haters. EDIT: Oh, ok. Just my initial reaction to the title. This is apparently about gaming addiction. I think they kind of misunderstood what Tasteless was saying about competitivity. Boss part Mr Tasteless, you are handsome. EDIT2: Oh there was a text part. Well, fuck you CNN. Not cool. EDIT3: CNN IS RUINING ESPORTS. Fact, but this does not need to go viral. Oh c'mon and think. Do you really think that eSports is as valid as "real sports"? Sure it is entertaining to watch pro players play their games and to play yourself, BUT did you think about the consequences of eSports for their participants? Take any korean kid from the B-team (and there should be a lot of them) and now tell me which useful things playing Starcraft has taught them for their future life? Which skill did they gain? I cant really see anything, because clicking fast isnt something terribly useful. So (in Starcraft terms): What do you transition into after spending 4-5 years semi-not-so-successful with playing a computer game? Thats the whole problem of eSports. The top pros will have made enough money and fame to support them and give them viable alternatives within the industry, but the spots there are VERY LIMITED and are occupied for much longer than a pro gamer career. There is no semi-usefulness for those not-top-players in other professions as there is in real sports. I know a guy who played football in 4th league (and he wasnt really an amateur during the time) and he is now a teacher with sports as one of his classes. ESports has no such transition and thus it is good if it doesnt grow too big. The years of 16-24 are very important for a human, because that is the time when you are able to learn new things easy. After that it will become harder and "wasting it" on a "trivial game" (which wont help you in your later 40-60 years) isnt a wise thing to do. ---- Computer games - as a whole - are entertaining to play, but as always there is a limit to when it becomes a bad thing. There was a guy 500 years ago who nailed that perfectly: Paracelsus (born Philippus Aureolus Theophrastus Bombastus von Hohenheim, 11 November or 17 December 1493 – 24 September 1541) "All things are poison, and nothing is without poison; only the dose permits something not to be poisonous." This is one of the major pieces of wisdom which a human has ever come up with and it applies to EVERYTHING IN LIFE. So dont be a spoiled four year old who starts to cry when mommy calls him home from the sandbox and think about eSports rationally and calmly. After 4-5 years you can become caster, there are many opportunities in gaming industry, you see it's pretty large. There is more than playing as pro in the gaming industry. Did you even watch the videos on the article? It makes your "I know a guy who played football in 4th league (and he wasnt really an amateur during the time) and he is now a teacher with sports as one of his classes. ESports has no such transition and thus it is good if it doesnt grow too big. " statement ridiculous. Did you see that MVP coach was ex-progamer? Also don't use arguments like "So dont be a spoiled four year old who starts to cry when mommy calls him home from the sandbox and think about eSports rationally and calmly." you make yourself look like a fool. Do you really think that there are spots as a caster for people from the B-team? Really? Enough to sustain someone? Be reasonable. There wont be enough spots for the guys from the A-team ... and there are more B-teamers than them. The reason it's problematic to transition from gaming whole day to a good job is because "esports" is a new thing, not because the essence of it is flawed. Strip every world-wide obsession with sports, remove all the money dealings and the communities and you get the same thing. Being a progamer is from a materialistical view point a bad idea in the current age, but I don't think it's a good idea spitting on it from all angles just because it is so. With time maybe "esports" can grow to such a length as normal sports and there will be more opportunities for B-teamers and the like. | ||
BlitzerSC
Italy8800 Posts
| ||
Kyrillion
Russian Federation748 Posts
Thats stupid. Necessity isnt needed to breed an addiction and for computer games it is the EASY WAY to spend some enjoyable time, because you dont have to move a bit. You dont even have to make a phone call to organize an evening with your friends, you just turn on the computer and log in and whoever is there is there and who isnt isnt. You can play with anyone from anywhere and the world is big enough so that there will always be someone to play with. While your message is spot-on on the social aspect of gaming, and I think we can all agree about that, you speak as if it were the only aspect of it. Do you really believe people enjoy video games only because of the particular form of people-to-people interaction ? | ||
Rabiator
Germany3948 Posts
On August 05 2012 18:46 Andr3 wrote: Show nested quote + On August 05 2012 18:41 Rabiator wrote: On August 05 2012 18:40 Rokoz wrote: On August 05 2012 18:28 Rabiator wrote: On August 05 2012 14:14 Kontys wrote: Skill or Addiction? .. Fucking haters. EDIT: Oh, ok. Just my initial reaction to the title. This is apparently about gaming addiction. I think they kind of misunderstood what Tasteless was saying about competitivity. Boss part Mr Tasteless, you are handsome. EDIT2: Oh there was a text part. Well, fuck you CNN. Not cool. EDIT3: CNN IS RUINING ESPORTS. Fact, but this does not need to go viral. Oh c'mon and think. Do you really think that eSports is as valid as "real sports"? Sure it is entertaining to watch pro players play their games and to play yourself, BUT did you think about the consequences of eSports for their participants? Take any korean kid from the B-team (and there should be a lot of them) and now tell me which useful things playing Starcraft has taught them for their future life? Which skill did they gain? I cant really see anything, because clicking fast isnt something terribly useful. So (in Starcraft terms): What do you transition into after spending 4-5 years semi-not-so-successful with playing a computer game? Thats the whole problem of eSports. The top pros will have made enough money and fame to support them and give them viable alternatives within the industry, but the spots there are VERY LIMITED and are occupied for much longer than a pro gamer career. There is no semi-usefulness for those not-top-players in other professions as there is in real sports. I know a guy who played football in 4th league (and he wasnt really an amateur during the time) and he is now a teacher with sports as one of his classes. ESports has no such transition and thus it is good if it doesnt grow too big. The years of 16-24 are very important for a human, because that is the time when you are able to learn new things easy. After that it will become harder and "wasting it" on a "trivial game" (which wont help you in your later 40-60 years) isnt a wise thing to do. ---- Computer games - as a whole - are entertaining to play, but as always there is a limit to when it becomes a bad thing. There was a guy 500 years ago who nailed that perfectly: Paracelsus (born Philippus Aureolus Theophrastus Bombastus von Hohenheim, 11 November or 17 December 1493 – 24 September 1541) "All things are poison, and nothing is without poison; only the dose permits something not to be poisonous." This is one of the major pieces of wisdom which a human has ever come up with and it applies to EVERYTHING IN LIFE. So dont be a spoiled four year old who starts to cry when mommy calls him home from the sandbox and think about eSports rationally and calmly. After 4-5 years you can become caster, there are many opportunities in gaming industry, you see it's pretty large. There is more than playing as pro in the gaming industry. Did you even watch the videos on the article? It makes your "I know a guy who played football in 4th league (and he wasnt really an amateur during the time) and he is now a teacher with sports as one of his classes. ESports has no such transition and thus it is good if it doesnt grow too big. " statement ridiculous. Did you see that MVP coach was ex-progamer? Also don't use arguments like "So dont be a spoiled four year old who starts to cry when mommy calls him home from the sandbox and think about eSports rationally and calmly." you make yourself look like a fool. Do you really think that there are spots as a caster for people from the B-team? Really? Enough to sustain someone? Be reasonable. There wont be enough spots for the guys from the A-team ... and there are more B-teamers than them. The reason it's problematic to transition from gaming whole day to a good job is because "esports" is a new thing, not because the essence of it is flawed. Strip every world-wide obsession with sports, remove all the money dealings and the communities and you get the same thing. Being a progamer is from a materialistical view point a bad idea in the current age, but I don't think it's a good idea spitting on it from all angles just because it is so. With time maybe "esports" can grow to such a length as normal sports and there will be more opportunities for B-teamers and the like. "Its a new thing" is a terrible excuse. NEW =/= GOOD NEW =/= USEFULL NEW =/= BETTER THAN THE OLD It only MIGHT BE any of the above, but it has to PROVE IT first! Thats one wisdom from me ... and thus I ask you to prove that it is worth it to grow as big as regular sports, which I doubt due to several reasons: a) Look at the ton of injuries which plague all those who started playing early. Almost everyone has carpal tunnel syndrome, because what does a kid of 12 do when an adult tells him to "sit straight ..."? Exactly the opposite. It isnt "fun" to have your wrists hurt sometimes for the rest of your life and thus it is a terrible idea. I know mine hurt really bad sometimes and I cant work at my job as a layouter every once in a while. For real sports you will usually have a trainer who can help to prevent injuries and in any case the usual injuries are "macro injuries" which are treated much easier than any chronic injuries in your arms. b) The financial bad situation for progamers you mentioned yourself already. c) Kids need to develop their SOCIAL SKILLS by meeting real people during puberty and that excludes playing games the whole time because of the unused senses as I explained above. | ||
lem0ncake
England85 Posts
On August 05 2012 18:51 Kyrillion wrote: Show nested quote + Thats stupid. Necessity isnt needed to breed an addiction and for computer games it is the EASY WAY to spend some enjoyable time, because you dont have to move a bit. You dont even have to make a phone call to organize an evening with your friends, you just turn on the computer and log in and whoever is there is there and who isnt isnt. You can play with anyone from anywhere and the world is big enough so that there will always be someone to play with. While your message is spot-on on the social aspect of gaming, and I think we can all agree about that, you speak as if it were the only aspect of it. Do you really believe people enjoy video games only because of the particular form of people-to-people interaction ? I play games for entertainment and to beat others, nothing is so satisfying as defending some 2 bit cheese then macroing up an army and 1a. The only interaction from others I require from games are their tears of defeat. | ||
![]()
opterown
![]()
Australia54784 Posts
![]() | ||
Spidinko
Slovakia1174 Posts
On August 05 2012 18:31 Kyuki wrote: That's not the problem... You say it very well, but ignore the fact that pretty much all other sports or things in life where achievement require a ton of practice/workout is most often praised and put out to be something positive, whereas within gaming you still have this stereotypical view on how this poison is somehow "even more of a poison". Fuck that shit. Also there is much to be learned from playing games in general, both motorically, mentally, logically and from a pure knowledge perspective. Don't kid yourself. You can learn something, but there are much better ways to learn anything positive that comes from video games. And fast hands are pretty useful -> Maybe that should be a sport as well. | ||
Rabiator
Germany3948 Posts
On August 05 2012 18:51 Kyrillion wrote: Show nested quote + Thats stupid. Necessity isnt needed to breed an addiction and for computer games it is the EASY WAY to spend some enjoyable time, because you dont have to move a bit. You dont even have to make a phone call to organize an evening with your friends, you just turn on the computer and log in and whoever is there is there and who isnt isnt. You can play with anyone from anywhere and the world is big enough so that there will always be someone to play with. While your message is spot-on on the social aspect of gaming, and I think we can all agree about that, you speak as if it were the only aspect of it. Do you really believe people enjoy video games only because of the particular form of people-to-people interaction ? Obviously the social aspect is only one part of the game. It isnt even a big part of Starcraft, but rather the "guild games" like WoW. The point where I noticed that WoW wasnt really a great thing was when some guy tried to explain his own greatness during his last pvp match in guild chat. In a face-to-face meeting you can at least use your hands and arms and facial expressions to make it funny, but in a purely text-based environment that is impossible. Thus computer games are ok FOR A LIMITED TIME PER DAY and every kid should still work harder on developing real friendships. Facebook friends cant come over and help you out, but real friends can. | ||
nanaoei
3358 Posts
the author of the article tried to be descriptive, but this really doesn't give the level of detail i was hoping for. 'the announcers wear white lab coats and glasses giving them the air of scientists'? 'a glowing blue pyramid spitting out blue termites?' ...well i guess the writing style was a surprise, but the sort of appeal is not. looking inward as a gamer, what is this article actually trying to say? they're probes.. and cute.. T^T not termites.. "After the tournament, I talked with the psychologist, Dr. Han, about gaming addiction in Korea. I described MarineKing's training habits, and his personal story. He said the number of hours and the intensity with which he approaches "StarCraft II" borders on addiction. But there's one difference, he said. Pro gamers usually aren't addicts. Addicts can't succeed on a higher competitive level, he said. The game takes complete control. Pros, however, find a magical balance. They're obsessed with the game, maybe, but their playing of it isn't depressive, meandering and hopeless. They're chasing after a goal." it took the entire article to get to that point. alright. whatever... i guess it's a start, rofl | ||
Kyrillion
Russian Federation748 Posts
| ||
Integra
Sweden5626 Posts
On August 05 2012 18:28 Rabiator wrote: Show nested quote + On August 05 2012 14:14 Kontys wrote: Skill or Addiction? .. Fucking haters. EDIT: Oh, ok. Just my initial reaction to the title. This is apparently about gaming addiction. I think they kind of misunderstood what Tasteless was saying about competitivity. Boss part Mr Tasteless, you are handsome. EDIT2: Oh there was a text part. Well, fuck you CNN. Not cool. EDIT3: CNN IS RUINING ESPORTS. Fact, but this does not need to go viral. Oh c'mon and think. Do you really think that eSports is as valid as "real sports"? Sure it is entertaining to watch pro players play their games and to play yourself, BUT did you think about the consequences of eSports for their participants? Take any korean kid from the B-team (and there should be a lot of them) and now tell me which useful things playing Starcraft has taught them for their future life? Which skill did they gain? I cant really see anything, because clicking fast isnt something terribly useful. So (in Starcraft terms): What do you transition into after spending 4-5 years semi-not-so-successful with playing a computer game? Thats the whole problem of eSports. The top pros will have made enough money and fame to support them and give them viable alternatives within the industry, but the spots there are VERY LIMITED and are occupied for much longer than a pro gamer career. There is no semi-usefulness for those not-top-players in other professions as there is in real sports. I know a guy who played football in 4th league (and he wasnt really an amateur during the time) and he is now a teacher with sports as one of his classes. ESports has no such transition and thus it is good if it doesnt grow too big. The years of 16-24 are very important for a human, because that is the time when you are able to learn new things easy. After that it will become harder and "wasting it" on a "trivial game" (which wont help you in your later 40-60 years) isnt a wise thing to do. ---- Computer games - as a whole - are entertaining to play, but as always there is a limit to when it becomes a bad thing. There was a guy 500 years ago who nailed that perfectly: Paracelsus (born Philippus Aureolus Theophrastus Bombastus von Hohenheim, 11 November or 17 December 1493 – 24 September 1541) Show nested quote + "All things are poison, and nothing is without poison; only the dose permits something not to be poisonous." This is one of the major pieces of wisdom which a human has ever come up with and it applies to EVERYTHING IN LIFE. So dont be a spoiled four year old who starts to cry when mommy calls him home from the sandbox and think about eSports rationally and calmly. This could be said about any athletic sports though, if a guy decides to dedicate all his time on running and for the longest time shows promises but never makes it and after 5 years has nothing to show for it. Your argument can be applied to any field within sports really, its not in any way unique for Esports. | ||
Azelja
Japan762 Posts
| ||
Andre
Slovenia3523 Posts
On August 05 2012 19:00 Rabiator wrote: Show nested quote + On August 05 2012 18:46 Andr3 wrote: On August 05 2012 18:41 Rabiator wrote: On August 05 2012 18:40 Rokoz wrote: On August 05 2012 18:28 Rabiator wrote: On August 05 2012 14:14 Kontys wrote: Skill or Addiction? .. Fucking haters. EDIT: Oh, ok. Just my initial reaction to the title. This is apparently about gaming addiction. I think they kind of misunderstood what Tasteless was saying about competitivity. Boss part Mr Tasteless, you are handsome. EDIT2: Oh there was a text part. Well, fuck you CNN. Not cool. EDIT3: CNN IS RUINING ESPORTS. Fact, but this does not need to go viral. Oh c'mon and think. Do you really think that eSports is as valid as "real sports"? Sure it is entertaining to watch pro players play their games and to play yourself, BUT did you think about the consequences of eSports for their participants? Take any korean kid from the B-team (and there should be a lot of them) and now tell me which useful things playing Starcraft has taught them for their future life? Which skill did they gain? I cant really see anything, because clicking fast isnt something terribly useful. So (in Starcraft terms): What do you transition into after spending 4-5 years semi-not-so-successful with playing a computer game? Thats the whole problem of eSports. The top pros will have made enough money and fame to support them and give them viable alternatives within the industry, but the spots there are VERY LIMITED and are occupied for much longer than a pro gamer career. There is no semi-usefulness for those not-top-players in other professions as there is in real sports. I know a guy who played football in 4th league (and he wasnt really an amateur during the time) and he is now a teacher with sports as one of his classes. ESports has no such transition and thus it is good if it doesnt grow too big. The years of 16-24 are very important for a human, because that is the time when you are able to learn new things easy. After that it will become harder and "wasting it" on a "trivial game" (which wont help you in your later 40-60 years) isnt a wise thing to do. ---- Computer games - as a whole - are entertaining to play, but as always there is a limit to when it becomes a bad thing. There was a guy 500 years ago who nailed that perfectly: Paracelsus (born Philippus Aureolus Theophrastus Bombastus von Hohenheim, 11 November or 17 December 1493 – 24 September 1541) "All things are poison, and nothing is without poison; only the dose permits something not to be poisonous." This is one of the major pieces of wisdom which a human has ever come up with and it applies to EVERYTHING IN LIFE. So dont be a spoiled four year old who starts to cry when mommy calls him home from the sandbox and think about eSports rationally and calmly. After 4-5 years you can become caster, there are many opportunities in gaming industry, you see it's pretty large. There is more than playing as pro in the gaming industry. Did you even watch the videos on the article? It makes your "I know a guy who played football in 4th league (and he wasnt really an amateur during the time) and he is now a teacher with sports as one of his classes. ESports has no such transition and thus it is good if it doesnt grow too big. " statement ridiculous. Did you see that MVP coach was ex-progamer? Also don't use arguments like "So dont be a spoiled four year old who starts to cry when mommy calls him home from the sandbox and think about eSports rationally and calmly." you make yourself look like a fool. Do you really think that there are spots as a caster for people from the B-team? Really? Enough to sustain someone? Be reasonable. There wont be enough spots for the guys from the A-team ... and there are more B-teamers than them. The reason it's problematic to transition from gaming whole day to a good job is because "esports" is a new thing, not because the essence of it is flawed. Strip every world-wide obsession with sports, remove all the money dealings and the communities and you get the same thing. Being a progamer is from a materialistical view point a bad idea in the current age, but I don't think it's a good idea spitting on it from all angles just because it is so. With time maybe "esports" can grow to such a length as normal sports and there will be more opportunities for B-teamers and the like. "Its a new thing" is a terrible excuse. NEW =/= GOOD NEW =/= USEFULL NEW =/= BETTER THAN THE OLD It only MIGHT BE any of the above, but it has to PROVE IT first! Thats one wisdom from me ... and thus I ask you to prove that it is worth it to grow as big as regular sports, which I doubt due to several reasons: a) Look at the ton of injuries which plague all those who started playing early. Almost everyone has carpal tunnel syndrome, because what does a kid of 12 do when an adult tells him to "sit straight ..."? Exactly the opposite. It isnt "fun" to have your wrists hurt sometimes for the rest of your life and thus it is a terrible idea. I know mine hurt really bad sometimes and I cant work at my job as a layouter every once in a while. For real sports you will usually have a trainer who can help to prevent injuries and in any case the usual injuries are "macro injuries" which are treated much easier than any chronic injuries in your arms. b) The financial bad situation for progamers you mentioned yourself already. c) Kids need to develop their SOCIAL SKILLS by meeting real people during puberty and that excludes playing games the whole time because of the unused senses as I explained above. The reason I said it's a new thing is because, it's not accepted in our society. I'm not saying it should, or that it shouldn't, only that it COULD be. If it is the level of acceptance could be the same to that of regular sports. There arren't many injuries, CTS is the main one, maybe back pain. Both of these things can be negated with appropriate measures(most mouses/keyboards are very ergonomic now, sitting properly on the chair etc). It's a valid point about injuries, but just as you said it can be dealt with if you know how/someone helps you, like a trainer. Financial problems are due to the niche community that is gaming(let's admit it, we're really not that big) I get it what you're trying to say, CURRENTLY it's bad - I'm not saying it's not. There arren't many people who get into gaming because of money, those that do probably think it's the only thing they can do. I just think that any mentions of money are in vain at this time, it's a problem of today but maybe not of tomorrow. Lots of BW teams and even SlayerS in SC2 have physical exercising every day, helps with health issues that might arise by over-gaming. And just like that maybe some time could be set aside for the socializing. I know it's a big stretch, but just a thing to consider. Before I say what I'll say, I highly respect regular sports...but how many people can you say train a specific thing for 12-16hours like the SC pros(mostly reffering to BW guys)? SC pros train so much that it's insane, you can make a case that gaming whole day is way easier than running all day because of physical strain..but consider the mental ones as well. Great willpower is needed for this kind of training and dedication, I just think koreans got it to a whole new level compared to [MOST] regular sports. I don't see many clubs training football all day, not even every day(they could, the training would be less effective but it's same with SC). Asian mentality>western! Many of the things you've written are things you have to consider as sacrifice, it's same in sports but in my opinion not to such extent as SC. When you dedicate every non-sleeping hour of your day to one thing, that's just respect worthy. ...or it's addiction like CNN says. | ||
red4ce
United States7313 Posts
| ||
Shantastic
United States435 Posts
| ||
LennoxPM
Lithuania84 Posts
| ||
Spidinko
Slovakia1174 Posts
On August 05 2012 19:51 LennoxPM wrote: "Just before the 19-minute mark, Kas ambushed MarineKing on his side of the city. A flurry of insect-like alien creatures swarmed his human base and started pecking away at it." - they really got their facts straight. That's a pivotal part of the report, of course. | ||
lem0ncake
England85 Posts
On August 05 2012 20:08 Spidinko wrote: Show nested quote + On August 05 2012 19:51 LennoxPM wrote: "Just before the 19-minute mark, Kas ambushed MarineKing on his side of the city. A flurry of insect-like alien creatures swarmed his human base and started pecking away at it." - they really got their facts straight. That's a pivotal part of the report, of course. If someone writes an article on whatever subject, it's not unreasonable to expect the author to carry out some proper research and have an understanding of the topic. | ||
Thrombozyt
Germany1269 Posts
On August 05 2012 20:16 lem0ncake wrote: Show nested quote + On August 05 2012 20:08 Spidinko wrote: On August 05 2012 19:51 LennoxPM wrote: "Just before the 19-minute mark, Kas ambushed MarineKing on his side of the city. A flurry of insect-like alien creatures swarmed his human base and started pecking away at it." - they really got their facts straight. That's a pivotal part of the report, of course. If someone writes an article on whatever subject, it's not unreasonable to expect the author to carry out some proper research and have an understanding of the topic. Or at least watch the game and realize, that the players both have the same faction. | ||
Kyrillion
Russian Federation748 Posts
Or at least watch the game and realize, that the players both have the same faction. Err, it seems more likely they saw a TvZ and simply got confused in the names. | ||
-CheekyDuck-
Australia398 Posts
also mkp story bought a tear to my eye. | ||
Shantastic
United States435 Posts
| ||
![]()
NovemberstOrm
Canada16217 Posts
| ||
mRandy
Sweden146 Posts
| ||
Kyrillion
Russian Federation748 Posts
| ||
spirates
Sweden148 Posts
| ||
Vei
United States2845 Posts
Good article, very interesting how gaming addiction IS so big in korea. I think it's a very interesting topic. | ||
LGStarcraft
United States40 Posts
| ||
GoSuChicken
Germany1726 Posts
| ||
birdmanilikeflying
Australia22 Posts
E-sports seems to be getting more and more exposure in the mainstream press. | ||
KING CHARLIE :D
United States447 Posts
Every time an article is written on a person that i'm interested in, or know a lot about, the person always says that the article either 1. didn't get their story right 2. completely fabricated things It seems like this is no exception. This is why I would never spend money on a newspaper. Where does it end? Every fucking story has to be like this...you're essentially paying to be entertained by their warped perception of things, not educated. | ||
SpiZe
Canada3640 Posts
On August 05 2012 14:18 Zzoram wrote: Where are the articles about American Football addiction and how 4 players die each year from football on average, never mind the thousands of concussions that can lead to permanent brain damage? Video Games are evil, don't you dare deny it ! | ||
Uncultured
United States1340 Posts
| ||
Sumahi
Guam5609 Posts
| ||
JebOfArabia
United States18 Posts
Maybe it's a step in the right direction but, in the end, just more of the same from traditional media. | ||
ZaaaaaM
Netherlands1828 Posts
| ||
Mandalor
Germany2362 Posts
MarineKing's competitor was DarKFoRce, from Germany, whose oily hair and sleep-deprived face made him look like the American stereotype of an obsessed video game player. This gave me a good laugh. Other than that: Standard tabloid journalism. I'm surprised this offends so many of you. I think I've read like 10 articles similar to this. | ||
ymir233
United States8275 Posts
On August 05 2012 14:17 imMUTAble787 wrote: They lost me when they were comparing MKP to people addicted to Maple Story. Lol wtf? Not like I was expecting anything from any sort of major media outlet to begin with, though. You should see MKP run a ZPQ by himself. | ||
SnuggleZhenya
596 Posts
| ||
Antares_
Poland269 Posts
| ||
Kyrillion
Russian Federation748 Posts
| ||
ES.Genie
Germany1370 Posts
Maybe I am the only one, but I found the article very interesting and I am glad to get to know more about players like Mvp and MKP. | ||
GeorgeForeman
United States1746 Posts
Addiction to games is a serious topic, but it's not taken seriously here. The author implies that MKP thinks he's some military commander when he's playing, which is absurd. Pro players are not addicts. The exact same piece could've been written about any professional or olympic athlete training to be the best. Fuck, how are video game pros more ridiculous than Trampoline Olympians?!? | ||
iiGreetings
Canada563 Posts
On August 05 2012 14:29 Psychlone wrote: Did you see that Clockwork Orange style "therapy"? Its messed up! Yeah, I feel like that is so fucking extreme and psychotic lol.. don't see that working to well. Honestly video game addiction is directly related to brain stimulation and craving that simulation because it's so easy to get it. Therefore, people become addicted to it and since usually other aspects of their live seem to go downhill (i.e. less social) they can fall into hard depression. That's what i think, but i am no pro haha | ||
Neurosis
United States893 Posts
| ||
JebOfArabia
United States18 Posts
On August 05 2012 22:22 Mandalor wrote: Show nested quote + MarineKing's competitor was DarKFoRce, from Germany, whose oily hair and sleep-deprived face made him look like the American stereotype of an obsessed video game player. This gave me a good laugh. Other than that: Standard tabloid journalism. I'm surprised this offends so many of you. I think I've read like 10 articles similar to this. I don't know if I would quite call it tabloid journalism but it does seem a bit sensationalized. It's a barrier the community has to overcome, having journalists write about SC2 or esports in general based on how news worthy our community is. Right now, it isn't news worthy (as far as traditional media is concerned) outside of a "look at this quirky pro gaming thing" or "video game addiction PARENTS WATCH OUT". Even journalists that are involved with esports and care about it getting good attention, like me, have a hard time getting editors to publish esports news. I'm lucky and I get it in sometimes but even when I do I have to put it the context of a story that an average reader would find interesting. It's tough and something we'll have to work on. Does TL or any other team send out press releases to traditional media journalists? Seems like a decent place to start. | ||
ES.Genie
Germany1370 Posts
On August 05 2012 22:43 GeorgeForeman wrote: What a hit piece. It's like some editor said, "People in China and Korea sometimes die because they play video games too much, and someone just told me there are people there who play games professionally. Hey, you! Find the connection and write about it! Also, use "quotation marks" inappropriately throughout your article!" Addiction to games is a serious topic, but it's not taken seriously here. The author implies that MKP thinks he's some military commander when he's playing, which is absurd. Pro players are not addicts. The exact same piece could've been written about any professional or olympic athlete training to be the best. Fuck, how are video game pros more ridiculous than Trampoline Olympians?!? "But there's one difference, he said. Pro gamers usually aren't addicts." :O | ||
Gosi
Sweden9072 Posts
I would bet my left nut that they wouldn't have focused on the "omg playing video games 12 hours a day, addiction bla bla" because they are good looking and successful. The same goes for our mainstream media here in the west. You think they would pick on gamers and addiction if we all were tall sexy hunks? No, I think we would have blended in right with everyone who practice an instrument or sport all day or those who sit on their ass in front of the TV and facebook from the time they get back home from school/work to the time they go to bed. | ||
renkin
France249 Posts
Even if the article starts portraying esports like addiction in a very biased way, the author actually says the opposite in the end with a quoted interview. Plus, you get a nice story about MKP who just won cool points in my coolness meter. However I agree that 8 pages of drug addiction comparison and just a ninth page about another point of view feels too biased... | ||
cristo1122
Australia505 Posts
On August 05 2012 14:25 justinpal wrote: Show nested quote + On August 05 2012 14:22 Itsmedudeman wrote: On August 05 2012 14:19 justinpal wrote: I don't think the author understands gaming culture very well. The match didn't last long. After setting up a base in the northeast corner of the map, MarineKing sent foot soldiers to root out his opponent's headquarters -- a glowing blue pyramid spitting out blue termites -- and blew the whole thing up before the 10-minute mark. His coach nodded approvingly and walked away. MarineKing paid no attention to the press photographers leaning over a rail to snap pictures. He was busy surfing the Internet, looking at pictures of pigtail-wearing Korean pop stars. Then he quickly moved on to another round of "StarCraft" -- not because of the competition, really. He just wanted -- or needed -- to keep playing. Or he's just dumbing it down for his audience like any intelligent writer who knows what the hell they're doing would? Yeah, he sent marines with 1/1 upgrades for a timing attack and marine split his marines on creep sounds really good to an audience. I was more referring to the article and the second part of the quote, I guess my comment wasn't clear. But, the part where they obsess over the fact that he types go or 1a2a3a4a as an indication of his addiction. I'm pretty certain there are a large number of players that do just that. most definetly its like boxing stuff randomly when on the net i know heaps of sc:bw/sc2 players who do this i found that this writer didnt really seem to understand certain things and then made superficial conclusions instead of just asking proper questions such as why are you doing that etc. | ||
Sooooil
Germany497 Posts
| ||
cristo1122
Australia505 Posts
On August 05 2012 14:35 justinpal wrote: Show nested quote + On August 05 2012 14:28 Itsmedudeman wrote: On August 05 2012 14:25 justinpal wrote: On August 05 2012 14:22 Itsmedudeman wrote: On August 05 2012 14:19 justinpal wrote: I don't think the author understands gaming culture very well. The match didn't last long. After setting up a base in the northeast corner of the map, MarineKing sent foot soldiers to root out his opponent's headquarters -- a glowing blue pyramid spitting out blue termites -- and blew the whole thing up before the 10-minute mark. His coach nodded approvingly and walked away. MarineKing paid no attention to the press photographers leaning over a rail to snap pictures. He was busy surfing the Internet, looking at pictures of pigtail-wearing Korean pop stars. Then he quickly moved on to another round of "StarCraft" -- not because of the competition, really. He just wanted -- or needed -- to keep playing. Or he's just dumbing it down for his audience like any intelligent writer who knows what the hell they're doing would? Yeah, he sent marines with 1/1 upgrades for a timing attack and marine split his marines on creep sounds really good to an audience. I was more referring to the article and the second part of the quote, I guess my comment wasn't clear. But, the part where they obsess over the fact that he types go or 1a2a3a4a as an indication of his addiction. I'm pretty certain there are a large number of players that do just that. No, that's clearly not what the writer meant at all. "much like a pianist would when warming up." is the phrase they used. If anything they're highlighting MKP's career and achievements as something good and productive. Ah, I cbf to read the entire thing. I read it as he was so addicted that he needed his fix and was anxious to get started. I see that part you mentioned, and I disagree that they were highlighting anything. Rather the author acknowledges this is an anxious warm-up. The way it's written is meant for you to think: "Wow, he really wants to play." He stated the number of times he typed go. I know nothing about MKP and his family so it can all be true. But, I have my doubts. ya spamming gogo and such is pretty standard for koreans (see in bw all the time) i would say mainly as they want to start rather than sitting in a booth twidling thier thumbs | ||
![]()
Zealously
East Gorteau22261 Posts
| ||
Shiori
3815 Posts
| ||
Green Sun s Zenith
Canada85 Posts
| ||
alexanderzero
United States659 Posts
The match didn't last long. After setting up a base in the northeast corner of the map, MarineKing sent foot soldiers to root out his opponent's headquarters -- a glowing blue pyramid spitting out blue termites -- and blew the whole thing up before the 10-minute mark. His coach nodded approvingly and walked away. MarineKing paid no attention to the press photographers leaning over a rail to snap pictures. He was busy surfing the Internet, looking at pictures of pigtail-wearing Korean pop stars. Then he quickly moved on to another round of "StarCraft" -- not because of the competition, really. He just wanted -- or needed -- to keep playing. This is one of the most patronizing things I have ever read. How often do professional athletes give the press attention as they're relaxing after a high profile match? If a football player sits on a bench and drinks some Gatorade, and doesn't pay attention to the photographers around him, does that make him addicted to football? From the sound of things MarineKing was busy playing in the middle of a fucking tournament. Of course he started another game.... The way the game is described lends absolutely no credence to the fact that it is a strategy game. He managed to "blow the whole thing up before the 10-minute mark"? Seriously? A game of Starcraft is a little more fucking complicated than blowing the whole thing up as fast as you can. CNN should be ashamed of itself and this "journalist" deserves to lose their job. | ||
SnuggleZhenya
596 Posts
On August 05 2012 23:47 alexanderzero wrote: Show nested quote + The match didn't last long. After setting up a base in the northeast corner of the map, MarineKing sent foot soldiers to root out his opponent's headquarters -- a glowing blue pyramid spitting out blue termites -- and blew the whole thing up before the 10-minute mark. His coach nodded approvingly and walked away. MarineKing paid no attention to the press photographers leaning over a rail to snap pictures. He was busy surfing the Internet, looking at pictures of pigtail-wearing Korean pop stars. Then he quickly moved on to another round of "StarCraft" -- not because of the competition, really. He just wanted -- or needed -- to keep playing. This is one of the most patronizing things I have ever read. How often do professional athletes give the press attention as they're relaxing after a high profile match? If a football player sits on a bench and drinks some Gatorade, and doesn't pay attention to the photographers around him, does that make him addicted to football? From the sound of things MarineKing was busy playing in the middle of a fucking tournament. Of course he started another game.... The way the game is described lends absolutely no credence to the fact that it is a strategy game. He managed to "blow the whole thing up before the 10-minute mark"? Seriously? A game of Starcraft is a little more fucking complicated than blowing the whole thing up as fast as you can. CNN should be ashamed of itself and this "journalist" deserves to lose their job. That last line boggles the mind. Yeah, he NEEDED to keep playing. Because he was doing his fucking job in a competition. For fucks sake, you might as well get upset that Roger Federer goes right back out on the court after the first set in Wimbledon. This article is a fucking disgrace. | ||
LeSioN
United States325 Posts
On August 05 2012 23:47 alexanderzero wrote: Show nested quote + The match didn't last long. After setting up a base in the northeast corner of the map, MarineKing sent foot soldiers to root out his opponent's headquarters -- a glowing blue pyramid spitting out blue termites -- and blew the whole thing up before the 10-minute mark. His coach nodded approvingly and walked away. MarineKing paid no attention to the press photographers leaning over a rail to snap pictures. He was busy surfing the Internet, looking at pictures of pigtail-wearing Korean pop stars. Then he quickly moved on to another round of "StarCraft" -- not because of the competition, really. He just wanted -- or needed -- to keep playing. This is one of the most patronizing things I have ever read. How often do professional athletes give the press attention as they're relaxing after a high profile match? If a football player sits on a bench and drinks some Gatorade, and doesn't pay attention to the photographers around him, does that make him addicted to football? From the sound of things MarineKing was busy playing in the middle of a fucking tournament. Of course he started another game.... The way the game is described lends absolutely no credence to the fact that it is a strategy game. He managed to "blow the whole thing up before the 10-minute mark"? Seriously? A game of Starcraft is a little more fucking complicated than blowing the whole thing up as fast as you can. CNN should be ashamed of itself and this "journalist" deserves to lose their job. I was gonna say your being an idiot. then i realized that the author implies over and over that our community, specifically, is comprised of addicts. dosent even bother to expand upon it or provide any sort of evidence just tells a story and adds in "or like a junkie looking for a fix." fucking bullshit. MKP is an awesome player and an inspiration to a lot of people. comparing him to a junkie simply to get more attention is absolute garbage. | ||
Roe
Canada6002 Posts
On August 05 2012 23:09 cristo1122 wrote: btw there is no such thing as adiction more correctly it is dependance as the individual depends on (X) to replace something that is missing in their life Show nested quote + On August 05 2012 14:35 justinpal wrote: On August 05 2012 14:28 Itsmedudeman wrote: On August 05 2012 14:25 justinpal wrote: On August 05 2012 14:22 Itsmedudeman wrote: On August 05 2012 14:19 justinpal wrote: I don't think the author understands gaming culture very well. The match didn't last long. After setting up a base in the northeast corner of the map, MarineKing sent foot soldiers to root out his opponent's headquarters -- a glowing blue pyramid spitting out blue termites -- and blew the whole thing up before the 10-minute mark. His coach nodded approvingly and walked away. MarineKing paid no attention to the press photographers leaning over a rail to snap pictures. He was busy surfing the Internet, looking at pictures of pigtail-wearing Korean pop stars. Then he quickly moved on to another round of "StarCraft" -- not because of the competition, really. He just wanted -- or needed -- to keep playing. Or he's just dumbing it down for his audience like any intelligent writer who knows what the hell they're doing would? Yeah, he sent marines with 1/1 upgrades for a timing attack and marine split his marines on creep sounds really good to an audience. I was more referring to the article and the second part of the quote, I guess my comment wasn't clear. But, the part where they obsess over the fact that he types go or 1a2a3a4a as an indication of his addiction. I'm pretty certain there are a large number of players that do just that. No, that's clearly not what the writer meant at all. "much like a pianist would when warming up." is the phrase they used. If anything they're highlighting MKP's career and achievements as something good and productive. Ah, I cbf to read the entire thing. I read it as he was so addicted that he needed his fix and was anxious to get started. I see that part you mentioned, and I disagree that they were highlighting anything. Rather the author acknowledges this is an anxious warm-up. The way it's written is meant for you to think: "Wow, he really wants to play." He stated the number of times he typed go. I know nothing about MKP and his family so it can all be true. But, I have my doubts. ya spamming gogo and such is pretty standard for koreans (see in bw all the time) i would say mainly as they want to start rather than sitting in a booth twidling thier thumbs Kind of seems like you just said there's no such thing as addiction and then went on to define addiction. | ||
Hakanfrog
Sweden690 Posts
On August 05 2012 22:22 Mandalor wrote: Show nested quote + MarineKing's competitor was DarKFoRce, from Germany, whose oily hair and sleep-deprived face made him look like the American stereotype of an obsessed video game player. This gave me a good laugh. Other than that: Standard tabloid journalism. I'm surprised this offends so many of you. I think I've read like 10 articles similar to this. That quote is the most retarded shit ever. I don´t see how it´s relevant at all. In the game, he belonged. He was a conqueror -- a general who controlled sci-fi armies and determined the fate of civilization. He drifted further into the game and, as his parents came to see it, out of the physical world. It was all fiction, of course, but it seemed real to him. And soon MarineKing started to like this fantasy world better than the real one. This takes the price. | ||
Marou
Germany1371 Posts
edit : okay the text is god awful tho. | ||
Shiori
3815 Posts
Why bother implying he's an addict if you're going to just say at the end 'but actually he's really not?' Answer should be pretty obvious. They want to say he was an addict who stopped being one by virtue of becoming good, which is ridiculous. | ||
noobcakes
United States526 Posts
| ||
ODKStevez
Ireland1225 Posts
| ||
Nafa
129 Posts
On August 05 2012 21:59 SpiZe wrote: Where are the articles about American Football addiction and how 4 players die each year from football on average, never mind the thousands of concussions that can lead to permanent brain damage? A word from the wise ones. | ||
Pokebunny
United States10654 Posts
On August 05 2012 23:06 Sooooil wrote: Wait what. MKP earns 105k $ a year? I didn't think Prime could afford such a salary. nobody said that was just his salary, I'm sure he makes plenty from streaming and tournaments. | ||
Gevna
France2332 Posts
And that part on darkforce shocked me, this is pretty insulting. But on the other side, there are so much priceless quotes from this article, that it becomes kinda funny. "In the game, he belonged. He was a conqueror -- a general who controlled sci-fi armies and determined the fate of civilization. He drifted further into the game and, as his parents came to see it, out of the physical world. It was all fiction, of course, but it seemed real to him. And soon MarineKing started to like this fantasy world better than the real one." => Man, I didn't know about MKP's psychological troubles :-/ | ||
Oboeman
Canada3980 Posts
Just before the 19-minute mark, Kas ambushed MarineKing on his side of the city. A flurry of insect-like alien creatures swarmed his human base and started pecking away at it. did Kas off-race for WCG? I thought the article was pretty balanced. It addresses the issue of gaming addiction without outright accusing the pro-gamers of it. | ||
Incze
Romania2058 Posts
| ||
Redfish
United States142 Posts
Honestly, I didn't think it was all that bad, everything considered. It's easy for us as people familiar with the game to get upset about a journalist not being familiar with the build orders or names of units and then use that to discredit everything in it altogether. Ignorance about tournaments or unit names aside, the story of MKP's childhood was pretty harrowing. It's impossible for virtually all of us (assuming very few of us on here are parents) to imagine struggling with our own child to that level and fearing for their life. We also can't brush away the fact that for every MKP, there are so many more who don't make it and throw away their chance at education or a normal life to go after an impossible dream because they truly are addicted. And yes, some video games are addictive. True, there are people addicted to exercise (I knew one such person) or sports or a million other things, and we could do a better job of addressing those cases too. You see it all the time with athletes who get into trouble when they have to retire. But that doesn't erase the fact that there are some problems with addiction to SC2 and other games out there as well. | ||
Shiori
3815 Posts
On August 06 2012 01:00 TGalore wrote: At the risk of getting crucified here, I'll offer a somewhat different opinion on the article. Honestly, I didn't think it was all that bad, everything considered. It's easy for us as people familiar with the game to get upset about a journalist not being familiar with the build orders or names of units and then use that to discredit everything in it altogether. Ignorance about tournaments or unit names aside, the story of MKP's childhood was pretty harrowing. It's impossible for virtually all of us (assuming very few of us on here are parents) to imagine struggling with our own child to that level and fearing for their life. We also can't brush away the fact that for every MKP, there are so many more who don't make it and throw away their chance at education or a normal life to go after an impossible dream because they truly are addicted. And yes, some video games are addictive. True, there are people addicted to exercise (I knew one such person) or sports or a million other things, and we could do a better job of addressing those cases too. You see it all the time with athletes who get into trouble when they have to retire. But that doesn't erase the fact that there are some problems with addiction to SC2 and other games out there as well. The problem is that the actual psychiatrist they interviewed said directly that progamers generally aren't addicts, which basically undercuts the entire spirit of the article, which was pretty transparent to begin with. | ||
Liman
Serbia681 Posts
| ||
Klipsys
United States1533 Posts
how possible would it be to get this guy on LO3 so he can talk to some pro gamers or learn more about or culture? | ||
Doomblaze
United States1292 Posts
"Just before the 19-minute mark, Kas ambushed MarineKing on his side of the city. A flurry of insect-like alien creatures swarmed his human base and started pecking away at it." like really, I can't believe anything in the article anymore. | ||
LittleAtari
Jordan1090 Posts
well, at least we've got Forbes. | ||
leperphilliac
United States399 Posts
| ||
Klipsys
United States1533 Posts
| ||
Ettick
United States2434 Posts
| ||
Xiphos
Canada7507 Posts
| ||
jeeeeohn
United States1343 Posts
On August 05 2012 14:25 Itsmedudeman wrote: Show nested quote + On August 05 2012 14:21 Wegandi wrote: On August 05 2012 14:18 Zzoram wrote: Where are the articles about American Football addiction and how 4 players die each year from football on average, never mind the thousands of concussions that can lead to permanent brain damage? It's only an addiction when they disagree with your personal behavior. If you play a physical sport like say, football, or baseball for 5+ hours everyday, you're lauded. If you study math or science for 10+ hours a day, you're lauded. God forbid, you were a unique individual with their own likes and desires instead of some tabula rasa for them to mold to their own ends. Never ceases, does it? ? Dumb comparison. Most people can't play physical sports as long for as long as someone can play a video game (and addicts can play all day), and someone who studies actually benefits from it? Wtf? Are we really comparing the productivity of studying math and science to that of playing a video game here? Let me know how that looks on a college application. TL is really out of touch it seems these days.. Thank you for writing this because if I had I'd probably have gotten a warning or temp ban. TL is insane nowadays, which is really just representative of the culture in general wherein wasting time has somehow evolved into productivity. Newsflash: headline: every pro player is addicted to the game and video games are not art and video games are not productive, at all, ever, not now or in the future. You are not a special snowflake for grinding Starcraft 2 into the soft bits of your brain twelve hours a day. Go read a book or something. | ||
Shiori
3815 Posts
On August 06 2012 01:27 jeeeeohn wrote: Show nested quote + On August 05 2012 14:25 Itsmedudeman wrote: On August 05 2012 14:21 Wegandi wrote: On August 05 2012 14:18 Zzoram wrote: Where are the articles about American Football addiction and how 4 players die each year from football on average, never mind the thousands of concussions that can lead to permanent brain damage? It's only an addiction when they disagree with your personal behavior. If you play a physical sport like say, football, or baseball for 5+ hours everyday, you're lauded. If you study math or science for 10+ hours a day, you're lauded. God forbid, you were a unique individual with their own likes and desires instead of some tabula rasa for them to mold to their own ends. Never ceases, does it? ? Dumb comparison. Most people can't play physical sports as long for as long as someone can play a video game (and addicts can play all day), and someone who studies actually benefits from it? Wtf? Are we really comparing the productivity of studying math and science to that of playing a video game here? Let me know how that looks on a college application. TL is really out of touch it seems these days.. Thank you for writing this because if I had I'd probably have gotten a warning or temp ban. TL is insane nowadays, which is really just representative of the culture in general wherein wasting time has somehow evolved into productivity. Newsflash: headline: every pro player is addicted to the game and video games are not art and video games are not productive, at all, ever, not now or in the future. You are not a special snowflake for grinding Starcraft 2 into the soft bits of your brain twelve hours a day. Go read a book or something. Aw, cute. Prove your shit. 1) What is art? 2) What is "productive"? 3) Do you know every pro player? 4) How do you define addiction? 5) How is making money playing video games wasteful? | ||
julianto
2292 Posts
| ||
Dundron2000
Sweden1140 Posts
| ||
Dundron2000
Sweden1140 Posts
On August 06 2012 01:30 julianto wrote: They got what they wanted: a lot of article views from a large demographic on the internet. They did this by putting up an article that would surely stir up that community. CNN couldn't give 2 shits about young males 10-25, its not their target audience. | ||
DiuLaSing
Hong Kong225 Posts
On August 06 2012 01:33 Dundron2000 wrote: Show nested quote + On August 06 2012 01:30 julianto wrote: They got what they wanted: a lot of article views from a large demographic on the internet. They did this by putting up an article that would surely stir up that community. CNN couldn't give 2 shits about young males 10-25, its not their target audience. but those 10-25 young males will grow up...oh shit | ||
effecto
France142 Posts
Still its not the good strategy. Sorry for my bad english. | ||
Rah
United States973 Posts
On August 06 2012 01:27 jeeeeohn wrote: Show nested quote + On August 05 2012 14:25 Itsmedudeman wrote: On August 05 2012 14:21 Wegandi wrote: On August 05 2012 14:18 Zzoram wrote: Where are the articles about American Football addiction and how 4 players die each year from football on average, never mind the thousands of concussions that can lead to permanent brain damage? It's only an addiction when they disagree with your personal behavior. If you play a physical sport like say, football, or baseball for 5+ hours everyday, you're lauded. If you study math or science for 10+ hours a day, you're lauded. God forbid, you were a unique individual with their own likes and desires instead of some tabula rasa for them to mold to their own ends. Never ceases, does it? ? Dumb comparison. Most people can't play physical sports as long for as long as someone can play a video game (and addicts can play all day), and someone who studies actually benefits from it? Wtf? Are we really comparing the productivity of studying math and science to that of playing a video game here? Let me know how that looks on a college application. TL is really out of touch it seems these days.. Thank you for writing this because if I had I'd probably have gotten a warning or temp ban. TL is insane nowadays, which is really just representative of the culture in general wherein wasting time has somehow evolved into productivity. Newsflash: headline: every pro player is addicted to the game and video games are not art and video games are not productive, at all, ever, not now or in the future. You are not a special snowflake for grinding Starcraft 2 into the soft bits of your brain twelve hours a day. Go read a book or something. It's truth that there's no difference between grinding SC2 12 hrs a day and any other game or MMO out there. There's a pro scene but that's a huge amount of time wasted for someone who never ends up being a pro. On the other hand pro SC2 does have a place in the world and the top few players will always be revered by some. For people who don't care about the game though they're more likely to form an opinion similar to CNN. I believe gaming is a bad habit more than it is an addiction. If you could go pro at biting your nails all day it would be comparable. | ||
Spidinko
Slovakia1174 Posts
On August 05 2012 20:48 NovemberstOrm wrote: Starcraft 2 as a competitive sport is comparable to real sports such as basketball,foot ball,soccer, etc. Yeah, right. Same way it's comparable to competitive toilet cleaning. It (toilet cleaning) is very physically demanding. Not every competition or activity is a sport. Edit: cleared something out | ||
LittleAtari
Jordan1090 Posts
"I'm IncontroL, I bench x amount of lbs and I'm a professional gamer, not an addict" "I'm Sean Day9 Plott. I hold an MFA in interactive media and have been featured numerous times in Forbes magazine. I'm an eSports commentator and analyst, not an addict" With all the amazing people that are progamers and do stuff in the scene, they chose to focus on addiction ![]() | ||
Shiori
3815 Posts
On August 06 2012 01:38 Rah wrote: Show nested quote + On August 06 2012 01:27 jeeeeohn wrote: On August 05 2012 14:25 Itsmedudeman wrote: On August 05 2012 14:21 Wegandi wrote: On August 05 2012 14:18 Zzoram wrote: Where are the articles about American Football addiction and how 4 players die each year from football on average, never mind the thousands of concussions that can lead to permanent brain damage? It's only an addiction when they disagree with your personal behavior. If you play a physical sport like say, football, or baseball for 5+ hours everyday, you're lauded. If you study math or science for 10+ hours a day, you're lauded. God forbid, you were a unique individual with their own likes and desires instead of some tabula rasa for them to mold to their own ends. Never ceases, does it? ? Dumb comparison. Most people can't play physical sports as long for as long as someone can play a video game (and addicts can play all day), and someone who studies actually benefits from it? Wtf? Are we really comparing the productivity of studying math and science to that of playing a video game here? Let me know how that looks on a college application. TL is really out of touch it seems these days.. Thank you for writing this because if I had I'd probably have gotten a warning or temp ban. TL is insane nowadays, which is really just representative of the culture in general wherein wasting time has somehow evolved into productivity. Newsflash: headline: every pro player is addicted to the game and video games are not art and video games are not productive, at all, ever, not now or in the future. You are not a special snowflake for grinding Starcraft 2 into the soft bits of your brain twelve hours a day. Go read a book or something. It's truth that there's no difference between grinding SC2 12 hrs a day and any other game or MMO out there. There's a pro scene but that's a huge amount of time wasted for someone who never ends up being a pro. On the other hand pro SC2 does have a place in the world and the top few players will always be revered by some. For people who don't care about the game though they're more likely to form an opinion similar to CNN. I believe gaming is a bad habit more than it is an addiction. If you could go pro at biting your nails all day it would be comparable. If anything, this shows you've been infected by some sort of pragmatism rather than that videogaming is 'bad.' I always laugh when people criticize gaming on the grounds of 'productivity' while failing to consider that productivity for productivity's sake is completely arbitrary, and is only something that people have argued for in the post-narrative era we live in. Seriously, productivity is probably the god of this generation (i.e. last 20 years). It's sad, and it's arbitrary, and I wish people would shut up about it. | ||
Dundron2000
Sweden1140 Posts
On August 06 2012 01:34 DiuLaSing wrote: Show nested quote + On August 06 2012 01:33 Dundron2000 wrote: On August 06 2012 01:30 julianto wrote: They got what they wanted: a lot of article views from a large demographic on the internet. They did this by putting up an article that would surely stir up that community. CNN couldn't give 2 shits about young males 10-25, its not their target audience. but those 10-25 young males will grow up...oh shit I don't think you don't run a multi-million corporation on the premise that you are building a viewership that will be valuable in a decades time if you already have a core demographic with pressure to perform well within a short- and medium term time span. | ||
Klipsys
United States1533 Posts
I won't post his email address, but his twitter is https://twitter.com/jdsutter and he has his email in one of his tweets. \ PLEASE DON'T EMBARRASS ESPORTS | ||
jeeeeohn
United States1343 Posts
On August 06 2012 01:29 Shiori wrote: Show nested quote + On August 06 2012 01:27 jeeeeohn wrote: On August 05 2012 14:25 Itsmedudeman wrote: On August 05 2012 14:21 Wegandi wrote: On August 05 2012 14:18 Zzoram wrote: Where are the articles about American Football addiction and how 4 players die each year from football on average, never mind the thousands of concussions that can lead to permanent brain damage? It's only an addiction when they disagree with your personal behavior. If you play a physical sport like say, football, or baseball for 5+ hours everyday, you're lauded. If you study math or science for 10+ hours a day, you're lauded. God forbid, you were a unique individual with their own likes and desires instead of some tabula rasa for them to mold to their own ends. Never ceases, does it? ? Dumb comparison. Most people can't play physical sports as long for as long as someone can play a video game (and addicts can play all day), and someone who studies actually benefits from it? Wtf? Are we really comparing the productivity of studying math and science to that of playing a video game here? Let me know how that looks on a college application. TL is really out of touch it seems these days.. Thank you for writing this because if I had I'd probably have gotten a warning or temp ban. TL is insane nowadays, which is really just representative of the culture in general wherein wasting time has somehow evolved into productivity. Newsflash: headline: every pro player is addicted to the game and video games are not art and video games are not productive, at all, ever, not now or in the future. You are not a special snowflake for grinding Starcraft 2 into the soft bits of your brain twelve hours a day. Go read a book or something. Aw, cute. Prove your shit. 1) What is art? 2) What is "productive"? 3) Do you know every pro player? 4) How do you define addiction? 5) How is making money playing video games wasteful? 1. A media through which the artist has a conversation with the recipient of the art. Usually these conversations cannot be had unless framed by a narrative or portrait or what have you. Video games are made by hundreds of people to be played with, by, and against millions of other people. Art exists in video games--music, models, etc.--but the product itself is not art, and can never be art, just by its very lack of deep, penetrating artistic vision. (Obviously I'm talking about AAA blockbusters. The indie scene might be different.) 2. Productive is advancing yourself in someway, I.E.: learning, creating, reading, writing, pretty much anything that doesn't involve wasting time, which may I remind you is the exact opposite of productivity. Playing a video game obsessively is, in general, not productive, for obvious reasons, chief among them because it's a video game created not to teach or advance an artistic principle but to entertain and waste time. Now, if you're truly devoted to becoming a professional Starcraft player, then fine, great, play it every day all day. However, if you're like 90% of the "I'm going pro" blogs on Team Liquid, then you're probably just wasting time. 3. Common attributes of professional sports players: love of the game, good work ethic, obsession. See: Kobe Bryant, Bobby Fischer, Roger Federer, MKP, Boxer. Even if I don't know every player, I can make an educated guess. 4. Addiction is obsession. I know something about it because my personality is addictive. I obsess over things. I was addicted to WoW, addicted to Starcraft, and I'm perpetually addicted to people. When I work on an artistic hobby I get obsessed. It's thinking about the same thing for days and days. 5. The people who are truly dedicated, the professionals making money, and those who are actually, fully, no-bullshit committed to the game are fine. I speak for myself, and people like me, who've obsessed over this damn game to avoid doing work or anything productive--not to advance ourselves in the game, mind you, but just to waste time--those are the people who shouldn't play video games, and to which the activity is harmful and detrimental. Those are my opinions, and if you disagree that's fine. | ||
DiuLaSing
Hong Kong225 Posts
On August 06 2012 01:42 Dundron2000 wrote: Show nested quote + On August 06 2012 01:34 DiuLaSing wrote: On August 06 2012 01:33 Dundron2000 wrote: On August 06 2012 01:30 julianto wrote: They got what they wanted: a lot of article views from a large demographic on the internet. They did this by putting up an article that would surely stir up that community. CNN couldn't give 2 shits about young males 10-25, its not their target audience. but those 10-25 young males will grow up...oh shit I don't think you don't run a multi-million corporation on the premise that you are building a viewership that will be valuable in a decades time if you already have a core demographic with pressure to perform well within a short- and medium term time span. True. But that mulit million corporation probably don't really care about the whole e-sport community. The video wasn't try to target this community anyways, it was targeted at parent, probably middle class parents, who kids are "addicted" to internet and gaming. | ||
Dundron2000
Sweden1140 Posts
On August 06 2012 01:47 DiuLaSing wrote: Show nested quote + On August 06 2012 01:42 Dundron2000 wrote: On August 06 2012 01:34 DiuLaSing wrote: On August 06 2012 01:33 Dundron2000 wrote: On August 06 2012 01:30 julianto wrote: They got what they wanted: a lot of article views from a large demographic on the internet. They did this by putting up an article that would surely stir up that community. CNN couldn't give 2 shits about young males 10-25, its not their target audience. but those 10-25 young males will grow up...oh shit I don't think you don't run a multi-million corporation on the premise that you are building a viewership that will be valuable in a decades time if you already have a core demographic with pressure to perform well within a short- and medium term time span. True. But that mulit million corporation probably don't really care about the whole e-sport community. The video wasn't try to target this community anyways, it was targeted at parent, probably middle class parents, who kids are "addicted" to internet and gaming. in that we are in agreement | ||
BobbyT
United States48 Posts
The part of the article that really struck me was the story of marineking screaming in his room after the electricity was cut. Very chilling, that is the kind of behavior you would expect to see from a drug addict who can't get his fix. Not from a game. | ||
Beorning
United States243 Posts
| ||
Shiori
3815 Posts
On August 06 2012 01:46 jeeeeohn wrote: Show nested quote + On August 06 2012 01:29 Shiori wrote: On August 06 2012 01:27 jeeeeohn wrote: On August 05 2012 14:25 Itsmedudeman wrote: On August 05 2012 14:21 Wegandi wrote: On August 05 2012 14:18 Zzoram wrote: Where are the articles about American Football addiction and how 4 players die each year from football on average, never mind the thousands of concussions that can lead to permanent brain damage? It's only an addiction when they disagree with your personal behavior. If you play a physical sport like say, football, or baseball for 5+ hours everyday, you're lauded. If you study math or science for 10+ hours a day, you're lauded. God forbid, you were a unique individual with their own likes and desires instead of some tabula rasa for them to mold to their own ends. Never ceases, does it? ? Dumb comparison. Most people can't play physical sports as long for as long as someone can play a video game (and addicts can play all day), and someone who studies actually benefits from it? Wtf? Are we really comparing the productivity of studying math and science to that of playing a video game here? Let me know how that looks on a college application. TL is really out of touch it seems these days.. Thank you for writing this because if I had I'd probably have gotten a warning or temp ban. TL is insane nowadays, which is really just representative of the culture in general wherein wasting time has somehow evolved into productivity. Newsflash: headline: every pro player is addicted to the game and video games are not art and video games are not productive, at all, ever, not now or in the future. You are not a special snowflake for grinding Starcraft 2 into the soft bits of your brain twelve hours a day. Go read a book or something. Aw, cute. Prove your shit. 1) What is art? 2) What is "productive"? 3) Do you know every pro player? 4) How do you define addiction? 5) How is making money playing video games wasteful? 1. A media through which the artist has a conversation with the recipient of the art. Usually these conversations cannot be had unless framed by a narrative or portrait or what have you. Video games are made by hundreds of people to be played with, by, and against millions of other people. Art exists in video games--music, models, etc.--but the product itself is not art, and can never be art, just by its very lack of deep, penetrating artistic vision. (Obviously I'm talking about AAA blockbusters. The indie scene might be different.) What? This makes literally no sense. Your second sentence is just asserting that anything other than a narrative/portrait (????) can't be art. Literally nothing you have said here disqualifies video games from having meaningful narratives or stylistic art. What you've essentially said is akin to saying that sentences are artful but novels are not. I understand that people are reluctant to accept video games as art, and personally I don't really consider most things (games, movies, or books) art, but that's a different story than saying a medium is necessarily not artful. 2. Productive is advancing yourself in someway, I.E.: learning, creating, reading, writing, pretty much anything that doesn't involve wasting time, which may I remind you is the exact opposite of productivity. Playing a video game obsessively is, in general, not productive, for obvious reasons, chief among them because it's a video game created not to teach or advance an artistic principle but to entertain and waste time. Now, if you're truly devoted to becoming a professional Starcraft player, then fine, great, play it every day all day. However, if you're like 90% of the "I'm going pro" blogs on Team Liquid, then you're probably just wasting time. This is moronic as well. I feel like you have a very immature understanding of what artists are. Whether something is a "waste of time" is not exactly something that can be objectively determined for all people. If I were to spend my entire life learning how to paint frescos, I would consider that a waste of time, because I don't like painting, nor am I talented at it. Similarly, I have absolutely no interest in geology, and becoming a renowned geologist would be an utter waste of time from my perspective. But going back to your first sentence, video games satisfy your measure, because they do advance the player in someway, namely, in skill at the game. 3. Common attributes of professional sports players: love of the game, good work ethic, obsession. See: Kobe Bryant, Bobby Fischer, Roger Federer, MKP, Boxer. Even if I don't know every player, I can make an educated guess. And you think obsession and addiction are the same thing? 4. Addiction is obsession. I know something about it because my personality is addictive. I obsess over things. I was addicted to WoW, addicted to Starcraft, and I'm perpetually addicted to people. When I work on an artistic hobby I get obsessed. It's thinking about the same thing for days and days. Oh, I guess you do. They aren't. I'm sorry that you think they are, but they aren't, and I'm telling you this as someone who has suffered from addiction as well as OCD. The psychological meaning of addiction is entirely different from intense interest or obsession with a subject. The two might be related, but they're not the same. Obsession can often be positive, whereas addiction occurs when the addictive subject controls the agent; obsession is just really intense interest. Addiction, on the other hand, is not. Gambling addiction, for example, is something which takes over a person's life. They may appear obsessed with gambling, but only because they are addicted to it. Similarly, someone who is obsessed with, say, literature, is probably not addicted to it, because literature does not control their psyche in a direct sense. 5. The people who are truly dedicated, the professionals making money, and those who are actually, fully, no-bullshit committed to the game are fine. I speak for myself, and people like me, who've obsessed over this damn game to avoid doing work or anything productive--not to advance ourselves in the game, mind you, but just to waste time--those are the people who shouldn't play video games, and to which the activity is harmful and detrimental. Then that has nothing to do with video games. That has to do with escapism, of which video games are simply the most modern means. Escapism is, firstly, not the same thing as addiction, although it can lead to addiction. And escapism generally has less to do with the subject of escape and more to do with dissatisfaction with the rest of life. Rather than blaming Starcraft, or video games, or whatever, for "wasting time," consider that the true culprit is probably that you actually don't really care about whatever work you're avoiding doing. The essential point you need to understand about addiction vs obsession is that the former is a compulsive thing whereas the latter is internally motivated. When I am obsessed with an author, I don't feel illogical compulsions to read their work; I read them because I am interested and I really want to read their work! When I feel "compelled" to do something, it's a niggling feeling in the back of my mind, connected to anxiety, which won't go away until it is satisfied. You can' have compulsions about things you really, really don't care about! I can't help but do things in sets of three when I'm feeling anxious, even though I'm certainly not obsessed with the number three. When I had a minor gambling addiction, I didn't want to gamble, and I didn't find it very interesting (pretty boring, actually) but I did it because it wouldn't leave me alone unless I did. The difference here is that there's no reason behind an addiction, whereas healthy obsession can arise from genuine interest and can be internally motivated. | ||
IRL_Sinister
Ireland621 Posts
On August 06 2012 01:44 Klipsys wrote: ANYONE UNHAPPY WITH THE ARTICLE AND TWEET/EMAIL THE AUTHOR DIRECTLY. I won't post his email address, but his twitter is https://twitter.com/jdsutter and he has his email in one of his tweets. \ PLEASE DON'T EMBARRASS ESPORTS You think a whole bunch of nerds tweeting the guy is going to make your case any better? | ||
Eufouria
United Kingdom4425 Posts
edit: And please SC2 community if you're going to email the guy give him a real well articulated review with well thought out points, the last thing we need is a bunch of angry nerds venting at this guy because then you're just giving him and anyone else who wants to right a follow-up article extra ammunition. Personally I'd say the worst thing about the article (apart from my gripes with the quality of the writing itself) is that it draws almost no line between professional video game players, who make a living from it and treat it as a job, and real video game addicts. There are 2 separate narratives in the article and they get switched between almost every other paragraph, which is almost certainly going to mislead anyone of doesn't already know a fair amount about the professional SC2 scene. Also the descriptions used are just terrible, spindly fingers doesn't conjure up any positive images and what's with the description of Darkforce? He's the only person apart from MKP singled out for a description and its insulting and misleading, of course the guy who maybe fits a negative stereotype is described but nobody else is. | ||
Spidinko
Slovakia1174 Posts
On August 06 2012 01:34 DiuLaSing wrote: Show nested quote + On August 06 2012 01:33 Dundron2000 wrote: On August 06 2012 01:30 julianto wrote: They got what they wanted: a lot of article views from a large demographic on the internet. They did this by putting up an article that would surely stir up that community. CNN couldn't give 2 shits about young males 10-25, its not their target audience. but those 10-25 young males will grow up...oh shit And when they grow up most of them will change..you know..grow up. When they are forced to live in a real world, they will reevaluate their opinions.(..oh shit?) | ||
kaokentake
383 Posts
so its funny lol.... i guess.. people commentating on it being bad or whatever... at least no one will read it other than us lol and we already know most of it is just stupid standard strawman reporting | ||
Trowa127
United Kingdom1230 Posts
But the secret she found was infuriating. It confirmed her worst fears: Her son, MarineKing, wanted to spend his life in an online world as a pro gamer." This bit angered me the most. What's strange is that MKP probably earns more than this guy and he's not even twenty yet! He's doing what he loves and making serious bank, I know thats a desirable goal for me, and probably a lot of other people, regardless of whether they play video games or not. What a load of trash. | ||
Klipsys
United States1533 Posts
On August 06 2012 01:56 IRL_Sinister wrote: Show nested quote + On August 06 2012 01:44 Klipsys wrote: ANYONE UNHAPPY WITH THE ARTICLE AND TWEET/EMAIL THE AUTHOR DIRECTLY. I won't post his email address, but his twitter is https://twitter.com/jdsutter and he has his email in one of his tweets. \ PLEASE DON'T EMBARRASS ESPORTS You think a whole bunch of nerds tweeting the guy is going to make your case any better? I think a group of mature adults writing dissenting opinions and offering more story to a journalist who obviously cares about his work will absolutely make my case better. People are not just going to email him pictures of gay porn and call it a day. True pro gaming fans are going to try and show him why we love our culture so much | ||
SpiZe
Canada3640 Posts
Obviously these are conclusions drawned from my own opinions and experience, and are not backed up by scientific study (before someone quotes me and says "excuse me but have you read X's study on Y matter" ) Now about the article, it's obvious that the author wasn't familiar with the game, or the gaming culture in general. I doubt the author even knew what the point of the game was (except the obvious "destroy the ennemy") . The aliens in a TvT matchup were... peculiar. The author also didn't understand why MKP kept playing games during the tournament, so he just "blamed" on the fact that he couldn't stop playing. The thesis of the article is also very confusing since they describe MKP as the guy that can't stop playing and is obsessed with the game during all of the article, but in the last paragraph is says that pro aren't addict. WTF ? Last thing, anyone else wonders about the meaning of this MarineKing's dad now calls his son by his screen name, even in private conversation. while pretty much everyone here knows that in the korean scene, aka are pretty much never used and everyone uses people's real name.I believe this is it for my thoughts. | ||
Dundron2000
Sweden1140 Posts
On August 06 2012 02:05 kaokentake wrote: the funny thing about this article is it was written for us, no one will read it but us. it was designed to be read by us so its funny lol.... i guess.. people commentating on it being bad or whatever... at least no one will read it other than us lol and we already know most of it is just stupid standard strawman reporting it was not made to be read by us but most of us did read it. edit: spelling | ||
iky43210
United States2099 Posts
grinding 12 hours in sc2 is worse than going to work, or even study for exams | ||
Rah
United States973 Posts
On August 06 2012 01:41 Shiori wrote: Show nested quote + On August 06 2012 01:38 Rah wrote: On August 06 2012 01:27 jeeeeohn wrote: On August 05 2012 14:25 Itsmedudeman wrote: On August 05 2012 14:21 Wegandi wrote: On August 05 2012 14:18 Zzoram wrote: Where are the articles about American Football addiction and how 4 players die each year from football on average, never mind the thousands of concussions that can lead to permanent brain damage? It's only an addiction when they disagree with your personal behavior. If you play a physical sport like say, football, or baseball for 5+ hours everyday, you're lauded. If you study math or science for 10+ hours a day, you're lauded. God forbid, you were a unique individual with their own likes and desires instead of some tabula rasa for them to mold to their own ends. Never ceases, does it? ? Dumb comparison. Most people can't play physical sports as long for as long as someone can play a video game (and addicts can play all day), and someone who studies actually benefits from it? Wtf? Are we really comparing the productivity of studying math and science to that of playing a video game here? Let me know how that looks on a college application. TL is really out of touch it seems these days.. Thank you for writing this because if I had I'd probably have gotten a warning or temp ban. TL is insane nowadays, which is really just representative of the culture in general wherein wasting time has somehow evolved into productivity. Newsflash: headline: every pro player is addicted to the game and video games are not art and video games are not productive, at all, ever, not now or in the future. You are not a special snowflake for grinding Starcraft 2 into the soft bits of your brain twelve hours a day. Go read a book or something. It's truth that there's no difference between grinding SC2 12 hrs a day and any other game or MMO out there. There's a pro scene but that's a huge amount of time wasted for someone who never ends up being a pro. On the other hand pro SC2 does have a place in the world and the top few players will always be revered by some. For people who don't care about the game though they're more likely to form an opinion similar to CNN. I believe gaming is a bad habit more than it is an addiction. If you could go pro at biting your nails all day it would be comparable. If anything, this shows you've been infected by some sort of pragmatism rather than that videogaming is 'bad.' I always laugh when people criticize gaming on the grounds of 'productivity' while failing to consider that productivity for productivity's sake is completely arbitrary, and is only something that people have argued for in the post-narrative era we live in. Seriously, productivity is probably the god of this generation (i.e. last 20 years). It's sad, and it's arbitrary, and I wish people would shut up about it. I'm just being real here and looking at things without Hotbid's E-Sports glasses over my eyes. Getting so mad about my opinion shows your own bias. The truth is there's a small amount of success going around compared to the time people have invested into this game. Many on this site have given up even and don't even play the game anymore, they just watch events to feel like they're part of a grassroots movement or something. To outsiders it comes across as weird to invest your life and passion into a game that they don't understand. Especially when popular opinion suggests our exposure to them should be limited. So there's nothing surprising about this article to me, but I'm surprised about some of our reactions to it. I agree with you that you shouldn't fill your life with only productive activities, because then you'd miss out on a lot, but be a little open minded and don't take your hobbies so seriously. You're guilty of the same thing CNN is. | ||
Thallis
United States314 Posts
On August 06 2012 01:56 IRL_Sinister wrote: Show nested quote + On August 06 2012 01:44 Klipsys wrote: ANYONE UNHAPPY WITH THE ARTICLE AND TWEET/EMAIL THE AUTHOR DIRECTLY. I won't post his email address, but his twitter is https://twitter.com/jdsutter and he has his email in one of his tweets. \ PLEASE DON'T EMBARRASS ESPORTS You think a whole bunch of nerds tweeting the guy is going to make your case any better? Especially when the article is pretty clearly presenting the case that Professional gaming is not addiction. Its kind of funny that so many people don't understand this is a positive article because it talks about addiction. The people the article is supposed to be for would have a hard time distinguishing between the two. The article pretty clearly show why Esport isn't addiction, while not just brushing away a very real issue. There's no reason for anyone to be upset about this article. | ||
v3chr0
United States856 Posts
There is a reason why gaming in America is handled so weirdly, and it's the media turning things into what they aren't. | ||
DiuLaSing
Hong Kong225 Posts
| ||
jeeeeohn
United States1343 Posts
On August 06 2012 01:55 Shiori wrote: Show nested quote + On August 06 2012 01:46 jeeeeohn wrote: On August 06 2012 01:29 Shiori wrote: On August 06 2012 01:27 jeeeeohn wrote: On August 05 2012 14:25 Itsmedudeman wrote: On August 05 2012 14:21 Wegandi wrote: On August 05 2012 14:18 Zzoram wrote: Where are the articles about American Football addiction and how 4 players die each year from football on average, never mind the thousands of concussions that can lead to permanent brain damage? It's only an addiction when they disagree with your personal behavior. If you play a physical sport like say, football, or baseball for 5+ hours everyday, you're lauded. If you study math or science for 10+ hours a day, you're lauded. God forbid, you were a unique individual with their own likes and desires instead of some tabula rasa for them to mold to their own ends. Never ceases, does it? ? Dumb comparison. Most people can't play physical sports as long for as long as someone can play a video game (and addicts can play all day), and someone who studies actually benefits from it? Wtf? Are we really comparing the productivity of studying math and science to that of playing a video game here? Let me know how that looks on a college application. TL is really out of touch it seems these days.. Thank you for writing this because if I had I'd probably have gotten a warning or temp ban. TL is insane nowadays, which is really just representative of the culture in general wherein wasting time has somehow evolved into productivity. Newsflash: headline: every pro player is addicted to the game and video games are not art and video games are not productive, at all, ever, not now or in the future. You are not a special snowflake for grinding Starcraft 2 into the soft bits of your brain twelve hours a day. Go read a book or something. Aw, cute. Prove your shit. 1) What is art? 2) What is "productive"? 3) Do you know every pro player? 4) How do you define addiction? 5) How is making money playing video games wasteful? 1. A media through which the artist has a conversation with the recipient of the art. Usually these conversations cannot be had unless framed by a narrative or portrait or what have you. Video games are made by hundreds of people to be played with, by, and against millions of other people. Art exists in video games--music, models, etc.--but the product itself is not art, and can never be art, just by its very lack of deep, penetrating artistic vision. (Obviously I'm talking about AAA blockbusters. The indie scene might be different.) What? This makes literally no sense. Your second sentence is just asserting that anything other than a narrative/portrait (????) can't be art. Literally nothing you have said here disqualifies video games from having meaningful narratives or stylistic art. What you've essentially said is akin to saying that sentences are artful but novels are not. Show nested quote + 2. Productive is advancing yourself in someway, I.E.: learning, creating, reading, writing, pretty much anything that doesn't involve wasting time, which may I remind you is the exact opposite of productivity. Playing a video game obsessively is, in general, not productive, for obvious reasons, chief among them because it's a video game created not to teach or advance an artistic principle but to entertain and waste time. Now, if you're truly devoted to becoming a professional Starcraft player, then fine, great, play it every day all day. However, if you're like 90% of the "I'm going pro" blogs on Team Liquid, then you're probably just wasting time. This is moronic as well. I feel like you have a very immature understanding of what artists are. Whether something is a "waste of time" is not exactly something that can be objectively determined for all people. If I were to spend my entire life learning how to paint frescos, I would consider that a waste of time, because I don't like painting, nor am I talented at it. Similarly, I have absolutely no interest in geology, and becoming a renowned geologist would be an utter waste of time from my perspective. But going back to your first sentence, video games satisfy your measure, because they do advance the player in someway, namely, in skill at the game. Show nested quote + 3. Common attributes of professional sports players: love of the game, good work ethic, obsession. See: Kobe Bryant, Bobby Fischer, Roger Federer, MKP, Boxer. Even if I don't know every player, I can make an educated guess. And you think obsession and addiction are the same thing? Show nested quote + 4. Addiction is obsession. I know something about it because my personality is addictive. I obsess over things. I was addicted to WoW, addicted to Starcraft, and I'm perpetually addicted to people. When I work on an artistic hobby I get obsessed. It's thinking about the same thing for days and days. Oh, I guess you do. They aren't. I'm sorry that you think they are, but they aren't, and I'm telling you this as someone who has suffered from addiction as well as OCD. The psychological meaning of addiction is entirely different from intense interest or obsession with a subject. The two might be related, but they're not the same. Obsession can often be positive, whereas addiction occurs when the addictive subject controls the agent; obsession is just really intense interest. Addiction, on the other hand, is not. Gambling addiction, for example, is something which takes over a person's life. They may appear obsessed with gambling, but only because they are addicted to it. Similarly, someone who is obsessed with, say, literature, is probably not addicted to it, because literature does not control their psyche in a direct sense. Show nested quote + 5. The people who are truly dedicated, the professionals making money, and those who are actually, fully, no-bullshit committed to the game are fine. I speak for myself, and people like me, who've obsessed over this damn game to avoid doing work or anything productive--not to advance ourselves in the game, mind you, but just to waste time--those are the people who shouldn't play video games, and to which the activity is harmful and detrimental. Then that has nothing to do with video games. That has to do with escapism, of which video games are simply the most modern means. Escapism is, firstly, not the same thing as addiction, although it can lead to addiction. And escapism generally has less to do with the subject of escape and more to do with dissatisfaction with the rest of life. Rather than blaming Starcraft, or video games, or whatever, for "wasting time," consider that the true culprit is probably that you actually don't really care about whatever work you're avoiding doing. You're entitled to your opinion. I'm not going to sit here and argue over semantics. Novels have one unifying artistic vision; video games are a hodgepodge of collective work to the expressed motive of creating a piece of entertainment, not something intellectually or spiritually or emotionally engaging. If you're trying to tell me that Starcraft has much of a moral or point as, say, 1984 or Things Fall Apart or Gravity's Rainbow or Infinite Jest or Neuromancer or Through a Scanner Darkly or literally any great work of fiction, I have to respectfully disagree. And before you bring up the fact that great fiction is entertaining, I concede that yes they are, of course they are, and why wouldn't they be? But they also contain something that video games lack, which is a point (and the point of this discussion, as it happens), the point being the author's perspective and ideas, singular, unifying, that construct his worldview and narrative. When I say author, narrative, I think you can think of the analogous terms for other forms of art (painting, music, etc.) on your own and go from there. Addiction can both be psychological and chemical. By the way, I despise the line by line forum argument. It's really everything that's wrong with internet anonymity in a nutshell. I can read how it's going to go from the outset. This is the part where I chastise you for calling me moronic and whatever. Then you're going to call me insensitive. Then I'm supposed to get riled up. Anyways, we have different opinions, and for once, just for once, you can let that go. | ||
Drake
Germany6146 Posts
| ||
Shiori
3815 Posts
On August 06 2012 02:11 Rah wrote: Show nested quote + On August 06 2012 01:41 Shiori wrote: On August 06 2012 01:38 Rah wrote: On August 06 2012 01:27 jeeeeohn wrote: On August 05 2012 14:25 Itsmedudeman wrote: On August 05 2012 14:21 Wegandi wrote: On August 05 2012 14:18 Zzoram wrote: Where are the articles about American Football addiction and how 4 players die each year from football on average, never mind the thousands of concussions that can lead to permanent brain damage? It's only an addiction when they disagree with your personal behavior. If you play a physical sport like say, football, or baseball for 5+ hours everyday, you're lauded. If you study math or science for 10+ hours a day, you're lauded. God forbid, you were a unique individual with their own likes and desires instead of some tabula rasa for them to mold to their own ends. Never ceases, does it? ? Dumb comparison. Most people can't play physical sports as long for as long as someone can play a video game (and addicts can play all day), and someone who studies actually benefits from it? Wtf? Are we really comparing the productivity of studying math and science to that of playing a video game here? Let me know how that looks on a college application. TL is really out of touch it seems these days.. Thank you for writing this because if I had I'd probably have gotten a warning or temp ban. TL is insane nowadays, which is really just representative of the culture in general wherein wasting time has somehow evolved into productivity. Newsflash: headline: every pro player is addicted to the game and video games are not art and video games are not productive, at all, ever, not now or in the future. You are not a special snowflake for grinding Starcraft 2 into the soft bits of your brain twelve hours a day. Go read a book or something. It's truth that there's no difference between grinding SC2 12 hrs a day and any other game or MMO out there. There's a pro scene but that's a huge amount of time wasted for someone who never ends up being a pro. On the other hand pro SC2 does have a place in the world and the top few players will always be revered by some. For people who don't care about the game though they're more likely to form an opinion similar to CNN. I believe gaming is a bad habit more than it is an addiction. If you could go pro at biting your nails all day it would be comparable. If anything, this shows you've been infected by some sort of pragmatism rather than that videogaming is 'bad.' I always laugh when people criticize gaming on the grounds of 'productivity' while failing to consider that productivity for productivity's sake is completely arbitrary, and is only something that people have argued for in the post-narrative era we live in. Seriously, productivity is probably the god of this generation (i.e. last 20 years). It's sad, and it's arbitrary, and I wish people would shut up about it. I'm just being real here and looking at things without Hotbid's E-Sports glasses over my eyes. Getting so mad about my opinion shows your own bias. The truth is there's a small amount of success going around compared to the time people have invested into this game. Many on this site have given up even and don't even play the game anymore, they just watch events to feel like they're part of a grassroots movement or something. To outsiders it comes across as weird to invest your life and passion into a game that they don't understand. Especially when popular opinion suggests our exposure to them should be limited. So there's nothing surprising about this article to me, but I'm surprised about some of our reactions to it. I agree with you that you shouldn't fill your life with only productive activities, because then you'd miss out on a lot, but be a little open minded and don't take your hobbies so seriously. You're guilty of the same thing CNN is. I'm not sure where you got the idea that I'm angry. Popular opinion, is, quite frankly, fucking moronic on virtually every subject. I think popular opinion is a pretty good yardstick for measuring what not to do, to be honest. I take my hobbies seriously because I take my life seriously. I wouldn't do something I don't think is worth doing, or at the very least I certainly wouldn't defend doing it. I think people who go out clubbing, for example, are wasting their time, but I can't think of a strong argument that could be used to convince them not to go, so I don't try to convince them. I just don't think it's for me. On the other hand, I really like competitive gaming. Be it chess, poker, or Starcraft 2, I enjoy it, and I do it, and I like watching other people do it. Who are you to decide that that's a poor way of living my life? Is there some objective standard for living that you've managed to find? | ||
DiuLaSing
Hong Kong225 Posts
On August 06 2012 02:12 Thallis wrote: Show nested quote + On August 06 2012 01:56 IRL_Sinister wrote: On August 06 2012 01:44 Klipsys wrote: ANYONE UNHAPPY WITH THE ARTICLE AND TWEET/EMAIL THE AUTHOR DIRECTLY. I won't post his email address, but his twitter is https://twitter.com/jdsutter and he has his email in one of his tweets. \ PLEASE DON'T EMBARRASS ESPORTS You think a whole bunch of nerds tweeting the guy is going to make your case any better? Especially when the article is pretty clearly presenting the case that Professional gaming is not addiction. Its kind of funny that so many people don't understand this is a positive article because it talks about addiction. The people the article is supposed to be for would have a hard time distinguishing between the two. The article pretty clearly show why Esport isn't addiction, while not just brushing away a very real issue. There's no reason for anyone to be upset about this article. but when you present the subject with two different type of "gaming" is misleading to audience. that's just a tactics they use to draw more attention is starcraft is more well known and bigger scope out of all. | ||
Shiori
3815 Posts
On August 06 2012 02:17 jeeeeohn wrote: Show nested quote + On August 06 2012 01:55 Shiori wrote: On August 06 2012 01:46 jeeeeohn wrote: On August 06 2012 01:29 Shiori wrote: On August 06 2012 01:27 jeeeeohn wrote: On August 05 2012 14:25 Itsmedudeman wrote: On August 05 2012 14:21 Wegandi wrote: On August 05 2012 14:18 Zzoram wrote: Where are the articles about American Football addiction and how 4 players die each year from football on average, never mind the thousands of concussions that can lead to permanent brain damage? It's only an addiction when they disagree with your personal behavior. If you play a physical sport like say, football, or baseball for 5+ hours everyday, you're lauded. If you study math or science for 10+ hours a day, you're lauded. God forbid, you were a unique individual with their own likes and desires instead of some tabula rasa for them to mold to their own ends. Never ceases, does it? ? Dumb comparison. Most people can't play physical sports as long for as long as someone can play a video game (and addicts can play all day), and someone who studies actually benefits from it? Wtf? Are we really comparing the productivity of studying math and science to that of playing a video game here? Let me know how that looks on a college application. TL is really out of touch it seems these days.. Thank you for writing this because if I had I'd probably have gotten a warning or temp ban. TL is insane nowadays, which is really just representative of the culture in general wherein wasting time has somehow evolved into productivity. Newsflash: headline: every pro player is addicted to the game and video games are not art and video games are not productive, at all, ever, not now or in the future. You are not a special snowflake for grinding Starcraft 2 into the soft bits of your brain twelve hours a day. Go read a book or something. Aw, cute. Prove your shit. 1) What is art? 2) What is "productive"? 3) Do you know every pro player? 4) How do you define addiction? 5) How is making money playing video games wasteful? 1. A media through which the artist has a conversation with the recipient of the art. Usually these conversations cannot be had unless framed by a narrative or portrait or what have you. Video games are made by hundreds of people to be played with, by, and against millions of other people. Art exists in video games--music, models, etc.--but the product itself is not art, and can never be art, just by its very lack of deep, penetrating artistic vision. (Obviously I'm talking about AAA blockbusters. The indie scene might be different.) What? This makes literally no sense. Your second sentence is just asserting that anything other than a narrative/portrait (????) can't be art. Literally nothing you have said here disqualifies video games from having meaningful narratives or stylistic art. What you've essentially said is akin to saying that sentences are artful but novels are not. 2. Productive is advancing yourself in someway, I.E.: learning, creating, reading, writing, pretty much anything that doesn't involve wasting time, which may I remind you is the exact opposite of productivity. Playing a video game obsessively is, in general, not productive, for obvious reasons, chief among them because it's a video game created not to teach or advance an artistic principle but to entertain and waste time. Now, if you're truly devoted to becoming a professional Starcraft player, then fine, great, play it every day all day. However, if you're like 90% of the "I'm going pro" blogs on Team Liquid, then you're probably just wasting time. This is moronic as well. I feel like you have a very immature understanding of what artists are. Whether something is a "waste of time" is not exactly something that can be objectively determined for all people. If I were to spend my entire life learning how to paint frescos, I would consider that a waste of time, because I don't like painting, nor am I talented at it. Similarly, I have absolutely no interest in geology, and becoming a renowned geologist would be an utter waste of time from my perspective. But going back to your first sentence, video games satisfy your measure, because they do advance the player in someway, namely, in skill at the game. 3. Common attributes of professional sports players: love of the game, good work ethic, obsession. See: Kobe Bryant, Bobby Fischer, Roger Federer, MKP, Boxer. Even if I don't know every player, I can make an educated guess. And you think obsession and addiction are the same thing? 4. Addiction is obsession. I know something about it because my personality is addictive. I obsess over things. I was addicted to WoW, addicted to Starcraft, and I'm perpetually addicted to people. When I work on an artistic hobby I get obsessed. It's thinking about the same thing for days and days. Oh, I guess you do. They aren't. I'm sorry that you think they are, but they aren't, and I'm telling you this as someone who has suffered from addiction as well as OCD. The psychological meaning of addiction is entirely different from intense interest or obsession with a subject. The two might be related, but they're not the same. Obsession can often be positive, whereas addiction occurs when the addictive subject controls the agent; obsession is just really intense interest. Addiction, on the other hand, is not. Gambling addiction, for example, is something which takes over a person's life. They may appear obsessed with gambling, but only because they are addicted to it. Similarly, someone who is obsessed with, say, literature, is probably not addicted to it, because literature does not control their psyche in a direct sense. 5. The people who are truly dedicated, the professionals making money, and those who are actually, fully, no-bullshit committed to the game are fine. I speak for myself, and people like me, who've obsessed over this damn game to avoid doing work or anything productive--not to advance ourselves in the game, mind you, but just to waste time--those are the people who shouldn't play video games, and to which the activity is harmful and detrimental. Then that has nothing to do with video games. That has to do with escapism, of which video games are simply the most modern means. Escapism is, firstly, not the same thing as addiction, although it can lead to addiction. And escapism generally has less to do with the subject of escape and more to do with dissatisfaction with the rest of life. Rather than blaming Starcraft, or video games, or whatever, for "wasting time," consider that the true culprit is probably that you actually don't really care about whatever work you're avoiding doing. You're entitled to your opinion. I'm not going to sit here and argue over semantics. Novels have one unifying artistic vision; video games are a hodgepodge of collective work to the expressed motive of creating a piece of entertainment, not something intellectually or spiritually or emotionally engaging. If you're trying to tell me that Starcraft has much of a moral or point as, say, 1984 or Things Fall Apart or Gravity's Rainbow or Infinite Jest or Neuromancer or Through a Scanner Darkly or literally any great work of fiction, I have to respectfully disagree. And before you bring up the fact that great fiction is entertaining, I concede that yes they are, of course they are, and why wouldn't they be? But they also contain something that video games lack, which is a point (and the point of this discussion, as it happens), the point being the author's perspective and ideas, singular, unifying, that construct his worldview and narrative. When I say author, narrative, I think you can think of the analogous terms for other forms of art (painting, music, etc.) on your own and go from there. Addiction can both be psychological and chemical. By the way, I despise the line by line forum argument. It's really everything that's wrong with internet anonymity in a nutshell. I can read how it's going to go from the outset. This is the part where I chastise you for calling me moronic and whatever. Then you're going to call me insensitive. Then I'm supposed to get riled up. Anyways, we have different opinions, and for once, just for once, you can let that go. I didn't say that Starcraft 2 has as much of a "moral point" as do [insert arbitrary list of literature]. But I don't think video games as a medium are necessarily incapable of possessing it. Shadow of the Colossus, for example, is a masterpiece in the sense that it creates a very powerful experience for the player. By the way, there are plenty of works of literature that are utterly meaningless (funnily enough, postmodernist literature practically defines itself by that notion, and it's far and away the most popular form right now) but that doesn't mean literature in general isn't meaningful. Addiction is certainly psychological and chemical, but to say that obsession and addiction are synonyms is simply false in light of modern psychology. Even the psychiatrist interviewed by CNN said that progamers aren't generally addicts. It seems like you've created a definition of "video game" that isn't exactly accurate (the intentions of developers are entirely their own) by extrapolating from AAA developers, who have never asserted that they are creating arthouse games, much in the sense that, say, the Harry Potter series can't seriously be taken as deep, meaningful literature. In addition, while I'm inclined to agree with your assessment of what constitutes true art to some degree, you can't really assert this very Modernist understanding of literature as if it were self-evident. There are a lot of aesthetic philosophies, ranging from nihilistic to existentialist to romanticist to art-for-art's sake. Take a look at your average Nabokov work, for example. Here we have a man who bluntly stated that he thought a unifying philosophical "big idea" simply does not belong in literature, and yet he wrote some of the most beautiful novels of the past century. You can argue that he's wrong (I'd certainly say he is) but you can't say that a motive of just wanting to create something that is simply entertaining or beautiful or aesthetically pleasing denies something status as art, because it just doesn't. I don't think being designed by a collective as opposed to a singular person matters at all (plays involve many actors and helpers, movies have an entire staff, and even some novels are collaborative) because artistic vision is not destroyed by collaboration. So in summary: do I think Sc2 s a piece of high art? No, not really, but I don't think it actually matters or implies that playing it is a waste of time. I like listening to vapid, repetitive music sometimes for no other reason than that I like the sound of it. Is that a waste of time? Why? It certainly serves a purpose for me. | ||
BobbyT
United States48 Posts
On August 06 2012 02:17 CoR wrote: oh and dont forget all the olympic sport addicted players ... now there is a drug thing in london for all this addicted poor guys ... what a waste of lifetime this read was ... Olympic atheletes have absolutely nothing to do with whether addiction exists within gaming or not. I do not understand why people think this is relevant. The article never said that all pro-gamers are addicted to gaming. It only talked about the experience of marineking, who seems to have struggled and may still struggle with a level of addiction to SCII. The story about him screaming in his room after having the electricity cut off i think is very convincing of that. With the level of time that pros need to put into SCII to become top players it is inevitable in my opinion, that some pros will suffer from gaming addiction. It's not a knock against SCII though. It's an important reminder to every gamer, in my opinion, that addiction is something to be aware of. | ||
Assirra
Belgium4169 Posts
Please correct me if i am wrong but as far as i know gaming does nothing addicting with your body/mind compared to lets say smoking or coffee. With coffee if for one day you don't drink it compared to every other day you will feel it even if you don't exactly want coffee With gaming however it is different, since no such thing like that exists can you truly call it an addiction? Imo its more people that can't control themselves rather then being actually addicted. These same people also can get addicted to anything else rather then just gaming. | ||
bellsNkeys
United States52 Posts
| ||
Metak
296 Posts
I wouldn't be surprised if there's addiction amongst professional, conventional sports athletes, and with that many others that are addicted to kicking or smashing against a ball. The fact that 'athletic' sport is generally seen as something healthy (which could be questioned about top athletes) would probably overshadow the 'addiction' part, similar to how alcohol is widely accepted while in fact, it is one of the most damaging and addictive drugs out there. | ||
Rah
United States973 Posts
On August 06 2012 02:20 Shiori wrote: Show nested quote + On August 06 2012 02:11 Rah wrote: On August 06 2012 01:41 Shiori wrote: On August 06 2012 01:38 Rah wrote: On August 06 2012 01:27 jeeeeohn wrote: On August 05 2012 14:25 Itsmedudeman wrote: On August 05 2012 14:21 Wegandi wrote: On August 05 2012 14:18 Zzoram wrote: Where are the articles about American Football addiction and how 4 players die each year from football on average, never mind the thousands of concussions that can lead to permanent brain damage? It's only an addiction when they disagree with your personal behavior. If you play a physical sport like say, football, or baseball for 5+ hours everyday, you're lauded. If you study math or science for 10+ hours a day, you're lauded. God forbid, you were a unique individual with their own likes and desires instead of some tabula rasa for them to mold to their own ends. Never ceases, does it? ? Dumb comparison. Most people can't play physical sports as long for as long as someone can play a video game (and addicts can play all day), and someone who studies actually benefits from it? Wtf? Are we really comparing the productivity of studying math and science to that of playing a video game here? Let me know how that looks on a college application. TL is really out of touch it seems these days.. Thank you for writing this because if I had I'd probably have gotten a warning or temp ban. TL is insane nowadays, which is really just representative of the culture in general wherein wasting time has somehow evolved into productivity. Newsflash: headline: every pro player is addicted to the game and video games are not art and video games are not productive, at all, ever, not now or in the future. You are not a special snowflake for grinding Starcraft 2 into the soft bits of your brain twelve hours a day. Go read a book or something. It's truth that there's no difference between grinding SC2 12 hrs a day and any other game or MMO out there. There's a pro scene but that's a huge amount of time wasted for someone who never ends up being a pro. On the other hand pro SC2 does have a place in the world and the top few players will always be revered by some. For people who don't care about the game though they're more likely to form an opinion similar to CNN. I believe gaming is a bad habit more than it is an addiction. If you could go pro at biting your nails all day it would be comparable. If anything, this shows you've been infected by some sort of pragmatism rather than that videogaming is 'bad.' I always laugh when people criticize gaming on the grounds of 'productivity' while failing to consider that productivity for productivity's sake is completely arbitrary, and is only something that people have argued for in the post-narrative era we live in. Seriously, productivity is probably the god of this generation (i.e. last 20 years). It's sad, and it's arbitrary, and I wish people would shut up about it. I'm just being real here and looking at things without Hotbid's E-Sports glasses over my eyes. Getting so mad about my opinion shows your own bias. The truth is there's a small amount of success going around compared to the time people have invested into this game. Many on this site have given up even and don't even play the game anymore, they just watch events to feel like they're part of a grassroots movement or something. To outsiders it comes across as weird to invest your life and passion into a game that they don't understand. Especially when popular opinion suggests our exposure to them should be limited. So there's nothing surprising about this article to me, but I'm surprised about some of our reactions to it. I agree with you that you shouldn't fill your life with only productive activities, because then you'd miss out on a lot, but be a little open minded and don't take your hobbies so seriously. You're guilty of the same thing CNN is. I'm not sure where you got the idea that I'm angry. Popular opinion, is, quite frankly, fucking moronic on virtually every subject. I think popular opinion is a pretty good yardstick for measuring what not to do, to be honest. I take my hobbies seriously because I take my life seriously. I wouldn't do something I don't think is worth doing, or at the very least I certainly wouldn't defend doing it. I think people who go out clubbing, for example, are wasting their time, but I can't think of a strong argument that could be used to convince them not to go, so I don't try to convince them. I just don't think it's for me. On the other hand, I really like competitive gaming. Be it chess, poker, or Starcraft 2, I enjoy it, and I do it, and I like watching other people do it. Who are you to decide that that's a poor way of living my life? Is there some objective standard for living that you've managed to find? I'm not saying anything like that so why are you acting so insecure about it? I've been playing SC2 every day, and watching events to pick up on strategies. All I'm saying is I understand why CNN looks at pro gaming the way they do, and maybe with more exposure it would become more acceptable to people who don't understand it right now, but I can't see that happening if the community is full of uptight nerds who get up in arms every time the game is displayed in a slightly negative light. You'd think CNN printed out a picture of Mohammad or something. Settle down and take negative press with a grain of salt like everyone else with a hobby in the world. All I'm saying. | ||
ROOTFayth
Canada3351 Posts
| ||
Shiori
3815 Posts
On August 06 2012 02:30 BobbyT wrote: Show nested quote + On August 06 2012 02:17 CoR wrote: oh and dont forget all the olympic sport addicted players ... now there is a drug thing in london for all this addicted poor guys ... what a waste of lifetime this read was ... The article never said that all pro-gamers are addicted to gaming. It only talked about the experience of marineking, who seems to have struggled and may still struggle with a level of addiction to SCII. The story about him screaming in his room after having the electricity cut off i think is very convincing of that. I don't actually think that's evidence of addiction at all, to be honest. It's more like immense frustrating at being denied something you really enjoy doing. If someone took away a novel I really liked halfway through my reading it, I'd be pissed off. | ||
Golgotha
Korea (South)8418 Posts
| ||
Shiori
3815 Posts
On August 06 2012 02:37 Rah wrote: Show nested quote + On August 06 2012 02:20 Shiori wrote: On August 06 2012 02:11 Rah wrote: On August 06 2012 01:41 Shiori wrote: On August 06 2012 01:38 Rah wrote: On August 06 2012 01:27 jeeeeohn wrote: On August 05 2012 14:25 Itsmedudeman wrote: On August 05 2012 14:21 Wegandi wrote: On August 05 2012 14:18 Zzoram wrote: Where are the articles about American Football addiction and how 4 players die each year from football on average, never mind the thousands of concussions that can lead to permanent brain damage? It's only an addiction when they disagree with your personal behavior. If you play a physical sport like say, football, or baseball for 5+ hours everyday, you're lauded. If you study math or science for 10+ hours a day, you're lauded. God forbid, you were a unique individual with their own likes and desires instead of some tabula rasa for them to mold to their own ends. Never ceases, does it? ? Dumb comparison. Most people can't play physical sports as long for as long as someone can play a video game (and addicts can play all day), and someone who studies actually benefits from it? Wtf? Are we really comparing the productivity of studying math and science to that of playing a video game here? Let me know how that looks on a college application. TL is really out of touch it seems these days.. Thank you for writing this because if I had I'd probably have gotten a warning or temp ban. TL is insane nowadays, which is really just representative of the culture in general wherein wasting time has somehow evolved into productivity. Newsflash: headline: every pro player is addicted to the game and video games are not art and video games are not productive, at all, ever, not now or in the future. You are not a special snowflake for grinding Starcraft 2 into the soft bits of your brain twelve hours a day. Go read a book or something. It's truth that there's no difference between grinding SC2 12 hrs a day and any other game or MMO out there. There's a pro scene but that's a huge amount of time wasted for someone who never ends up being a pro. On the other hand pro SC2 does have a place in the world and the top few players will always be revered by some. For people who don't care about the game though they're more likely to form an opinion similar to CNN. I believe gaming is a bad habit more than it is an addiction. If you could go pro at biting your nails all day it would be comparable. If anything, this shows you've been infected by some sort of pragmatism rather than that videogaming is 'bad.' I always laugh when people criticize gaming on the grounds of 'productivity' while failing to consider that productivity for productivity's sake is completely arbitrary, and is only something that people have argued for in the post-narrative era we live in. Seriously, productivity is probably the god of this generation (i.e. last 20 years). It's sad, and it's arbitrary, and I wish people would shut up about it. I'm just being real here and looking at things without Hotbid's E-Sports glasses over my eyes. Getting so mad about my opinion shows your own bias. The truth is there's a small amount of success going around compared to the time people have invested into this game. Many on this site have given up even and don't even play the game anymore, they just watch events to feel like they're part of a grassroots movement or something. To outsiders it comes across as weird to invest your life and passion into a game that they don't understand. Especially when popular opinion suggests our exposure to them should be limited. So there's nothing surprising about this article to me, but I'm surprised about some of our reactions to it. I agree with you that you shouldn't fill your life with only productive activities, because then you'd miss out on a lot, but be a little open minded and don't take your hobbies so seriously. You're guilty of the same thing CNN is. I'm not sure where you got the idea that I'm angry. Popular opinion, is, quite frankly, fucking moronic on virtually every subject. I think popular opinion is a pretty good yardstick for measuring what not to do, to be honest. I take my hobbies seriously because I take my life seriously. I wouldn't do something I don't think is worth doing, or at the very least I certainly wouldn't defend doing it. I think people who go out clubbing, for example, are wasting their time, but I can't think of a strong argument that could be used to convince them not to go, so I don't try to convince them. I just don't think it's for me. On the other hand, I really like competitive gaming. Be it chess, poker, or Starcraft 2, I enjoy it, and I do it, and I like watching other people do it. Who are you to decide that that's a poor way of living my life? Is there some objective standard for living that you've managed to find? I'm not saying anything like that so why are you acting so insecure about it? I've been playing SC2 every day, and watching events to pick up on strategies. All I'm saying is I understand why CNN looks at pro gaming the way they do, and maybe with more exposure it would become more acceptable to people who don't understand it right now, but I can't see that happening if the community is full of uptight nerds who get up in arms every time the game is displayed in a slightly negative light. You'd think CNN printed out a picture of Mohammad or something. Settle down and take negative press with a grain of salt like everyone else with a hobby in the world. All I'm saying. I understand why CNN has the opinion of gaming that they do, but having the right to an opinion is not the same as having one's opinion be right. If nobody explains what's wrong with CNN's opinion, then it continues to be repeated as unchallenged and gradually grows into fact. People should be up in arms every time something misleading, poorly researched, or simply wrong is said, and it shouldn't require an explanation for that. Anything else is essentially complacence, and the idea that things change automatically with "exposure" alone is nonsense. | ||
Executor1
1353 Posts
Did any of you actually read the entire thing before stating how much you hate CNN. http://www.cnn.com/interactive/2012/08/tech/gaming.series/korea.html?hpt=hp_c1 First of all they are pointing out a real issue, one that is more prevalent in korea. Second of all they paint the picture of gaming addicts and progamers differently. For MKP it was a bit in the middle but the conclusion in the end was that he was not an addict just a prog gamer with a strong will to win. Close to the end of the article they talk with an expert in addiction who says that pro gamers playing habits etc borders on symptoms of addiction but the difference is that most of the time they are not addicts. "After the tournament, I talked with the psychologist, Dr. Han, about gaming addiction in Korea. I described MarineKing's training habits, and his personal story. He said the number of hours and the intensity with which he approaches "StarCraft II" borders on addiction. But there's one difference, he said. Pro gamers usually aren't addicts. Addicts can't succeed on a higher competitive level, he said. The game takes complete control." Although I dont particularly think this article paints pro gamers in a positive light i wouldnt say it paints them in a negative one, it shows 2 sides of a story and 2 different perspectives. For instance when MVP's parents saw he wasnt excelling in school they took him to an aftershool starcraft academy to train to become pro. Then their is MKP's parents who tried anything to get their son to stop playing. By the end of the article I did not see MKP as a gaming addict out of control , I saw him as young man with a very strong will to win and succeed in something that he loves. | ||
Sandermatt
Switzerland1365 Posts
On August 06 2012 02:13 v3chr0 wrote: Addiction? I think they mean practice? An athlete doesn't become a professional by going to a Wizard, it requires dedication, and hard work, I guess that's an addiction though. There is a reason why gaming in America is handled so weirdly, and it's the media turning things into what they aren't. It is hard work if you make a living of it, or will make a living of it in the future. If it becomes clear that you will never make a living of it and you continue to play so much that it hurts your other activities (school, profession) then you are addicted. | ||
Shiori
3815 Posts
On August 06 2012 02:41 Sandermatt wrote: Show nested quote + On August 06 2012 02:13 v3chr0 wrote: Addiction? I think they mean practice? An athlete doesn't become a professional by going to a Wizard, it requires dedication, and hard work, I guess that's an addiction though. There is a reason why gaming in America is handled so weirdly, and it's the media turning things into what they aren't. It is hard work if you make a living of it, or will make a living of it in the future. If it becomes clear that you will never make a living of it and you continue to play so much that it hurts your other activities (school, profession) then you are addicted. That's actually not true, honestly. Addiction is not the same as refusing to recognize failure. Addiction is when you have a lack of control over what you do, and when you are compelled to do it by something other than a legitimate, reasonable desire to do it (from enjoyment etc etc). | ||
Executor1
1353 Posts
On August 06 2012 02:37 Rah wrote: Show nested quote + On August 06 2012 02:20 Shiori wrote: On August 06 2012 02:11 Rah wrote: On August 06 2012 01:41 Shiori wrote: On August 06 2012 01:38 Rah wrote: On August 06 2012 01:27 jeeeeohn wrote: On August 05 2012 14:25 Itsmedudeman wrote: On August 05 2012 14:21 Wegandi wrote: On August 05 2012 14:18 Zzoram wrote: Where are the articles about American Football addiction and how 4 players die each year from football on average, never mind the thousands of concussions that can lead to permanent brain damage? It's only an addiction when they disagree with your personal behavior. If you play a physical sport like say, football, or baseball for 5+ hours everyday, you're lauded. If you study math or science for 10+ hours a day, you're lauded. God forbid, you were a unique individual with their own likes and desires instead of some tabula rasa for them to mold to their own ends. Never ceases, does it? ? Dumb comparison. Most people can't play physical sports as long for as long as someone can play a video game (and addicts can play all day), and someone who studies actually benefits from it? Wtf? Are we really comparing the productivity of studying math and science to that of playing a video game here? Let me know how that looks on a college application. TL is really out of touch it seems these days.. Thank you for writing this because if I had I'd probably have gotten a warning or temp ban. TL is insane nowadays, which is really just representative of the culture in general wherein wasting time has somehow evolved into productivity. Newsflash: headline: every pro player is addicted to the game and video games are not art and video games are not productive, at all, ever, not now or in the future. You are not a special snowflake for grinding Starcraft 2 into the soft bits of your brain twelve hours a day. Go read a book or something. It's truth that there's no difference between grinding SC2 12 hrs a day and any other game or MMO out there. There's a pro scene but that's a huge amount of time wasted for someone who never ends up being a pro. On the other hand pro SC2 does have a place in the world and the top few players will always be revered by some. For people who don't care about the game though they're more likely to form an opinion similar to CNN. I believe gaming is a bad habit more than it is an addiction. If you could go pro at biting your nails all day it would be comparable. If anything, this shows you've been infected by some sort of pragmatism rather than that videogaming is 'bad.' I always laugh when people criticize gaming on the grounds of 'productivity' while failing to consider that productivity for productivity's sake is completely arbitrary, and is only something that people have argued for in the post-narrative era we live in. Seriously, productivity is probably the god of this generation (i.e. last 20 years). It's sad, and it's arbitrary, and I wish people would shut up about it. I'm just being real here and looking at things without Hotbid's E-Sports glasses over my eyes. Getting so mad about my opinion shows your own bias. The truth is there's a small amount of success going around compared to the time people have invested into this game. Many on this site have given up even and don't even play the game anymore, they just watch events to feel like they're part of a grassroots movement or something. To outsiders it comes across as weird to invest your life and passion into a game that they don't understand. Especially when popular opinion suggests our exposure to them should be limited. So there's nothing surprising about this article to me, but I'm surprised about some of our reactions to it. I agree with you that you shouldn't fill your life with only productive activities, because then you'd miss out on a lot, but be a little open minded and don't take your hobbies so seriously. You're guilty of the same thing CNN is. I'm not sure where you got the idea that I'm angry. Popular opinion, is, quite frankly, fucking moronic on virtually every subject. I think popular opinion is a pretty good yardstick for measuring what not to do, to be honest. I take my hobbies seriously because I take my life seriously. I wouldn't do something I don't think is worth doing, or at the very least I certainly wouldn't defend doing it. I think people who go out clubbing, for example, are wasting their time, but I can't think of a strong argument that could be used to convince them not to go, so I don't try to convince them. I just don't think it's for me. On the other hand, I really like competitive gaming. Be it chess, poker, or Starcraft 2, I enjoy it, and I do it, and I like watching other people do it. Who are you to decide that that's a poor way of living my life? Is there some objective standard for living that you've managed to find? I'm not saying anything like that so why are you acting so insecure about it? I've been playing SC2 every day, and watching events to pick up on strategies. All I'm saying is I understand why CNN looks at pro gaming the way they do, and maybe with more exposure it would become more acceptable to people who don't understand it right now, but I can't see that happening if the community is full of uptight nerds who get up in arms every time the game is displayed in a slightly negative light. You'd think CNN printed out a picture of Mohammad or something. Settle down and take negative press with a grain of salt like everyone else with a hobby in the world. All I'm saying. To be honest I think they pointed out some similarities between pro gaming and addiction but then pointed out distinct differences of between addicts and pro gamers basically showing 2 sides to the story. I dont even know if I would consider it bad press. If you read the whole thing its kind of like the writer was telling a story and it asks the question "was MKP just another internet addict or was he a young pro gamer with a strong will to succeed in something he loved". And as far as MVP goes everything they covered on him was very positive. | ||
sVnteen
Germany2238 Posts
so sad to see oh actually the video about mvp is really surprisingly good ![]() | ||
BobbyT
United States48 Posts
On August 06 2012 02:38 Shiori wrote: Show nested quote + On August 06 2012 02:30 BobbyT wrote: On August 06 2012 02:17 CoR wrote: oh and dont forget all the olympic sport addicted players ... now there is a drug thing in london for all this addicted poor guys ... what a waste of lifetime this read was ... The article never said that all pro-gamers are addicted to gaming. It only talked about the experience of marineking, who seems to have struggled and may still struggle with a level of addiction to SCII. The story about him screaming in his room after having the electricity cut off i think is very convincing of that. I don't actually think that's evidence of addiction at all, to be honest. It's more like immense frustrating at being denied something you really enjoy doing. If someone took away a novel I really liked halfway through my reading it, I'd be pissed off. Well yea, I'd be mad too if I was in marineking's shoes when that happened. But I wouldn't have started to scream in my room. From the article's description of the event, it was a reaction outside of what you would normally expect someone to do. It's not proof of addiction obviously, I'm only going off of this article which says he was screaming, but I think that it is definitely evidence of it. | ||
Executor1
1353 Posts
On August 06 2012 02:33 Assirra wrote: Addiction is such a weird subject when its about gaming. Please correct me if i am wrong but as far as i know gaming does nothing addicting with your body/mind compared to lets say smoking or coffee. With coffee if for one day you don't drink it compared to every other day you will feel it even if you don't exactly want coffee With gaming however it is different, since no such thing like that exists can you truly call it an addiction? Imo its more people that can't control themselves rather then being actually addicted. These same people also can get addicted to anything else rather then just gaming. Not 100% true, and im not very well versed in the subject so bear with me in my explanation. Gaming creates moments of satisfaction and accomplishment at a much higher rate then one could normally experience in the real world, and your brain releases a chemical (dopamine) that makes you feel good during these accomplishements etc. and people could very well get addicted to that feeling. At least thats what i understand on the subject, its still a controversial topic though. | ||
kaokentake
383 Posts
On August 06 2012 02:33 Assirra wrote: Addiction is such a weird subject when its about gaming. Please correct me if i am wrong but as far as i know gaming does nothing addicting with your body/mind compared to lets say smoking or coffee. With coffee if for one day you don't drink it compared to every other day you will feel it even if you don't exactly want coffee With gaming however it is different, since no such thing like that exists can you truly call it an addiction? Imo its more people that can't control themselves rather then being actually addicted. These same people also can get addicted to anything else rather then just gaming. theres physical and non-physical addiction GAMBLING is a heavy form of non-physical addiction. non-physical addiction means you are not addicted to any physical substance you add to your body (like cocaine), instead you are addicted to an activity. however there is still a chemical that you are probably addicted to when dealing with non-physical addictions, and that is DOPAMINE which is the chemical your brain releases when you do the action you enjoy many people report having extreme dopamine releases when they are addicted to gambling, and dopamine withdrawals when they stop gambling ive always thought starcraft was a very light non-physical addiction as ive never released too much dopamine while playing. but maybe MKP released a ton of dopamine while playing so maybe its a stronger addiction for him. who knows really | ||
jdseemoreglass
United States3773 Posts
| ||
Executor1
1353 Posts
On August 06 2012 02:51 kaokentake wrote: Show nested quote + On August 06 2012 02:33 Assirra wrote: Addiction is such a weird subject when its about gaming. Please correct me if i am wrong but as far as i know gaming does nothing addicting with your body/mind compared to lets say smoking or coffee. With coffee if for one day you don't drink it compared to every other day you will feel it even if you don't exactly want coffee With gaming however it is different, since no such thing like that exists can you truly call it an addiction? Imo its more people that can't control themselves rather then being actually addicted. These same people also can get addicted to anything else rather then just gaming. theres physical and non-physical addiction GAMBLING is a heavy form of non-physical addiction. non-physical addiction means you are not addicted to any physical substance you add to your body (like cocaine), instead you are addicted to an activity. however there is still a chemical that you are probably addicted to when dealing with non-physical addictions, and that is DOPAMINE which is the chemical your brain releases when you do the action you enjoy many people report having extreme dopamine releases when they are addicted to gambling, and dopamine withdrawals when they stop gambling ive always thought starcraft was a very light non-physical addiction as ive never released too much dopamine while playing. but maybe MKP released a ton of dopamine while playing so maybe its a stronger addiction for him. who knows really Thanks thats the chemical in your brain i was looking for DOPAMINE. Here is another example for those that didnt know. The effects of cocaine are that it releases a large amount of dopamine at once in your brain. So really cocaine addicts are in a way Dopamine addicts as they are addicted to the feeling that they get from all that dopamine being released, that is how cocaine gets you high. | ||
Executor1
1353 Posts
On August 06 2012 02:53 jdseemoreglass wrote: Sounds like a lot of people on tl get overly defensive and insecure when the issue of gaming addiction is brought up. Some of the responses are way over the top. I didn't read the article yet but I watched the video and it seemed pretty fair, especially given tasteless' comments. Yea if you read the entire article (something i bet very few people being so defensive did) it paints gaming addicts and pro gamers differently. Even in the case of MKP where he has showed symptoms growing up of what alot of people would think is gaming addiction the end conclusion is that he and most pro gamers are not gaming addicts they are just players with a strong will to succeed. | ||
Neurosis
United States893 Posts
| ||
TheRealPaciFist
United States1049 Posts
On August 05 2012 14:33 Wegandi wrote: Show nested quote + On August 05 2012 14:25 Itsmedudeman wrote: On August 05 2012 14:21 Wegandi wrote: On August 05 2012 14:18 Zzoram wrote: Where are the articles about American Football addiction and how 4 players die each year from football on average, never mind the thousands of concussions that can lead to permanent brain damage? It's only an addiction when they disagree with your personal behavior. If you play a physical sport like say, football, or baseball for 5+ hours everyday, you're lauded. If you study math or science for 10+ hours a day, you're lauded. God forbid, you were a unique individual with their own likes and desires instead of some tabula rasa for them to mold to their own ends. Never ceases, does it? ? Dumb comparison. Most people can't play physical sports as long for as long as someone can play a video game (and addicts can play all day), and someone who studies actually benefits from it? Wtf? Are we really comparing the productivity of studying math and science to that of playing a video game here? Let me know how that looks on a college application. TL is really out of touch it seems these days.. No, no one is comparing the merits, benefits, or costs with one activity to another, merely the fact that their definition of addiction is subjective and almost always entails periphery activities in society, or in other words, things they don't like or understand. They then proclaim it dangerous, in some paternalistic fashion, and almost always it is for the purpose of legislating away some more of your liberties and rights. Sorry, but I don't want to live in a society that bans fun, and instead pushes 'efficiency' or 'study study study'. I'm not a fucking robot and everyone is unique. We're not a borg to mold, to shape, to push an agenda on. If someone wants to play a game for 10+ hours a day good for them! Who the hell cares if 'society' or the Government would be better off with another scientist or some shit (it actually doesn't work that way, just ask any Asian country where the restriction of freedom has stifled creativity, entrepreneurship, etc. etc.). Besides, I'm just tired of paternalism that is so rampant. From fucking seat belts, to helmets, to walking your dog on the beach, drinking a beer while taking a walk, etc. For me, something is only an addiction if YOU decide that you don't want to do a particular activity anymore, but you keep doing it anyway. Admittedly, this definition doesn't work very well for, say, a cocaine addiction - doesn't matter whether you want to go clean or not, you're still obviously addicted - but I think it's a useful definition to keep in mind with regards to videogames or porn because so many people throw around the word like it means nothing. Unless MKP wants to quit Starcraft, or unless MKP's brain has had its dopamine button hammered out of existence by Starcraft, MKP is NOT an addict. So even though studying math and science ten hours a day would likely benefit society a million times more than playing Starcraft ten hours a day, still, fuck this article. -.- | ||
Tyree
1508 Posts
TL gets defensive about it because its Starcraft, if someone came here and said they played WoW for 10 hours they would get laughed off the forum, called addict loser freak. If they said they listened to Justin Bieber albums all day long they would get equal treatment. Biggest 2 issues in esports is that the nature of the thing means that progamers have to practice insane amount of hours a day, if they dont they will simply not be able to compete regardless of talent. "Real sports" avoids this by the very nature that your body will be harmed if you played football for 10 hours a day, or did any sport. It would injure you and strain your muscles. The other issue is cold hard $$$, for every Flash, Nada and Boxer there is 10.000 others who practice just as hard and never make it past being mere practice partners. You cannot parade the exception to the rule around and say "look how far we have come!" when that is not the rule, most progamers make less money and work harder than most people who work minimal pay jobs. The insane expectations put on them by their sponsors, pressure and traveling is grueling. esports is still in infancy stages, i just hope it advances further. The article was fine, and like i said, anyone who does anything for 10 hours a day, better get paid large sums of money for it. Most serious SC2 players do not get paid peanuts let alone any kind of real money to sustain themselves. | ||
cristo1122
Australia505 Posts
On August 06 2012 00:17 Roe wrote: Show nested quote + On August 05 2012 23:09 cristo1122 wrote: btw there is no such thing as adiction more correctly it is dependance as the individual depends on (X) to replace something that is missing in their life On August 05 2012 14:35 justinpal wrote: On August 05 2012 14:28 Itsmedudeman wrote: On August 05 2012 14:25 justinpal wrote: On August 05 2012 14:22 Itsmedudeman wrote: On August 05 2012 14:19 justinpal wrote: I don't think the author understands gaming culture very well. The match didn't last long. After setting up a base in the northeast corner of the map, MarineKing sent foot soldiers to root out his opponent's headquarters -- a glowing blue pyramid spitting out blue termites -- and blew the whole thing up before the 10-minute mark. His coach nodded approvingly and walked away. MarineKing paid no attention to the press photographers leaning over a rail to snap pictures. He was busy surfing the Internet, looking at pictures of pigtail-wearing Korean pop stars. Then he quickly moved on to another round of "StarCraft" -- not because of the competition, really. He just wanted -- or needed -- to keep playing. Or he's just dumbing it down for his audience like any intelligent writer who knows what the hell they're doing would? Yeah, he sent marines with 1/1 upgrades for a timing attack and marine split his marines on creep sounds really good to an audience. I was more referring to the article and the second part of the quote, I guess my comment wasn't clear. But, the part where they obsess over the fact that he types go or 1a2a3a4a as an indication of his addiction. I'm pretty certain there are a large number of players that do just that. No, that's clearly not what the writer meant at all. "much like a pianist would when warming up." is the phrase they used. If anything they're highlighting MKP's career and achievements as something good and productive. Ah, I cbf to read the entire thing. I read it as he was so addicted that he needed his fix and was anxious to get started. I see that part you mentioned, and I disagree that they were highlighting anything. Rather the author acknowledges this is an anxious warm-up. The way it's written is meant for you to think: "Wow, he really wants to play." He stated the number of times he typed go. I know nothing about MKP and his family so it can all be true. But, I have my doubts. ya spamming gogo and such is pretty standard for koreans (see in bw all the time) i would say mainly as they want to start rather than sitting in a booth twidling thier thumbs Kind of seems like you just said there's no such thing as addiction and then went on to define addiction. the point i was trying to make was that too often people see it as he takes drugs therefore drugs are bad except that the fact that he comes from an abusive home had nothing to do with him seeking escapism. therefore unless you address the underly then they will just relapse. | ||
ptrpb
Canada753 Posts
it's all about perception | ||
TheRealPaciFist
United States1049 Posts
On August 06 2012 02:51 kaokentake wrote: Show nested quote + On August 06 2012 02:33 Assirra wrote: Addiction is such a weird subject when its about gaming. Please correct me if i am wrong but as far as i know gaming does nothing addicting with your body/mind compared to lets say smoking or coffee. With coffee if for one day you don't drink it compared to every other day you will feel it even if you don't exactly want coffee With gaming however it is different, since no such thing like that exists can you truly call it an addiction? Imo its more people that can't control themselves rather then being actually addicted. These same people also can get addicted to anything else rather then just gaming. theres physical and non-physical addiction GAMBLING is a heavy form of non-physical addiction. non-physical addiction means you are not addicted to any physical substance you add to your body (like cocaine), instead you are addicted to an activity. however there is still a chemical that you are probably addicted to when dealing with non-physical addictions, and that is DOPAMINE which is the chemical your brain releases when you do the action you enjoy many people report having extreme dopamine releases when they are addicted to gambling, and dopamine withdrawals when they stop gambling ive always thought starcraft was a very light non-physical addiction as ive never released too much dopamine while playing. but maybe MKP released a ton of dopamine while playing so maybe its a stronger addiction for him. who knows really There's no difference between "physical" and "non-physical" addictions (though maybe you mean "substance" addiction versus not). Basics of how addiction works: you get pleasure (dopamine) from doing a particular activity, but with long exposure or repetition with this activity, eventually dopamine receptors in your brain are shut down. This means you need to do more of the activity in order to feel the same pleasure you used to - tolerance. After a while, so many receptors are shut down that even normal levels of dopamine don't feel good anymore (basics of every day life become duller) and that's when the addiction seeking really starts. Then it just snowballs until death or withdrawal =( Which is why I say there's no difference between "physical" and "non-physical" addictions: both gambling and cocaine use the exact same progression. Cocaine just starts off with a helluva lot more effect, which means it's a helluva lot more likely to hook you, and start off more potently. Cocaine and other hard drugs are dangerous as hell... but theoretically, if another addiction goes on long enough, I don't know of any reason why gambling or even videogames couldn't reach the same levels - again, they're just a lot less likely to do so Point is, don't do drugs kids and be careful with porn and videogames and gambling | ||
Nuclease
United States1049 Posts
Addiction is the continued use of a mood altering substance or behaviour despite adverse dependency consequences,[1] or a neurological impairment leading to such behaviors.[2] 1. Angres DH, Bettinardi-Angres K (October 2008). "The disease of addiction: origins, treatment, and recovery". Dis Mon 54 (10): 696–721. doi:10.1016/j.disamonth.2008.07.002. PMID 18790142. 2. American Society for Addiction Medicine (2012). Definition of Addiction. | ||
Account252508
3454 Posts
| ||
Zandar
Netherlands1541 Posts
![]() | ||
Xakta
United States35 Posts
In short, it made me mad to read through it. I'ma go back to watching all those 'Addicts' running or swimming around in London now. | ||
docvoc
United States5491 Posts
On August 06 2012 02:53 jdseemoreglass wrote: Sounds like a lot of people on tl get overly defensive and insecure when the issue of gaming addiction is brought up. Some of the responses are way over the top. I didn't read the article yet but I watched the video and it seemed pretty fair, especially given tasteless' comments. It wasn't fair at all really. They talked about MKP as if he never played BW and that he was a no-name person. He had been Foxer before hand and was pretty well known for being ridiculously good at rushing, MVP at that time was dominant but they never even talked about MMA or the GSL, the main SC2 tourney, not WCG. They basically said that MVP wasn't gaming addicted but that MKP was and that is bad. They basically were un-informed about a lot of things, they never even stopped to explain how gaming culture works and painted it as if addiction to other sports is healthy and gaming addiction is unhealthy. All in all the videos were good but only gave back story to a pretty biased opinion, though well written about Korean E-Sports. | ||
MrF
United States320 Posts
| ||
Oreo7
United States1647 Posts
On August 05 2012 14:19 Wegandi wrote: Good ol' CNN paternalism. What would we do without you! Pests, the lot of them, like a billion mosquitoes all poking and biting you, when all you want to do is be left alone and exercise your own damn rights. Who the fuck cares if someone plays a lot of games? It's their goddamn right. Similarly who the hell cares if someone does a bunch of drugs, it's their damn right. Tired of the corporate-Statist media and all its appendages telling us what 'acceptable' behavior is. Other than their faux-outrage and mission-creep, it would be an ok article. You took this pretty far | ||
Chrisje
Netherlands29 Posts
I though the article was pretty good and the main point they were trying to make that there is a good side, the "Pro Gaming", and then there is the bad side, which are the people who simply "Must play", the reason they portrayed MKP as an "addict" was mainly "that he couldn't stop playing" which they pointed out in the article, because he was always playing video games, and probably wasn't doing the mandatory amount of exercise. There is a really cool side of competitive gaming which is e-sports, but we should also remember that there are people who kind of are addicted to it, also when people like Tasteless/CNN speak about the addiction part is when people play 12-16+ hours playing games WITHOUT the proper dieting and exercise as pointed out by the IM coach and also people like Nada (check The Hax Life). TL:DR: Gaming is good as long as it doesn't take over your life (not eating, lack of sleep/exercise), so don't just bash CNN for being biased when they actually have quite some objective stuff to say in their video's. | ||
Nos-
Canada12016 Posts
| ||
babylon
8765 Posts
Honestly, if you even listen to some progamers (even ones who've made decent bank) talk about progaming as a career choice for their potential children, a lot of them just flat-out say that they wouldn't let their kids get into it because it's simply not a way to make a good living unless you are one-in-a-million. One very successful individual in particular who has made a lot of bank has said that if he could go back, he'd go to college and get a degree in business over progaming. Obviously, it's going a bit far to say that progamers are "addicted" to gaming. I think it's difficult to separate out, at this point in their careers, playing a lot because they're addicted and playing a lot because it's their job and also because it's pretty much the only thing they know. It's easier to tell who is "addicted" with people who aren't progamers, imo. | ||
sanddbox_sc2
United States173 Posts
On August 06 2012 03:02 Tyree wrote: Doing anything but breathing for 10 hours straight a day is grounds to call it a addiction problem. TL gets defensive about it because its Starcraft, if someone came here and said they played WoW for 10 hours they would get laughed off the forum, called addict loser freak. If they said they listened to Justin Bieber albums all day long they would get equal treatment. Biggest 2 issues in esports is that the nature of the thing means that progamers have to practice insane amount of hours a day, if they dont they will simply not be able to compete regardless of talent. "Real sports" avoids this by the very nature that your body will be harmed if you played football for 10 hours a day, or did any sport. It would injure you and strain your muscles. The other issue is cold hard $$$, for every Flash, Nada and Boxer there is 10.000 others who practice just as hard and never make it past being mere practice partners. You cannot parade the exception to the rule around and say "look how far we have come!" when that is not the rule, most progamers make less money and work harder than most people who work minimal pay jobs. The insane expectations put on them by their sponsors, pressure and traveling is grueling. esports is still in infancy stages, i just hope it advances further. The article was fine, and like i said, anyone who does anything for 10 hours a day, better get paid large sums of money for it. Most serious SC2 players do not get paid peanuts let alone any kind of real money to sustain themselves. Do we really *know* that practicing 10 hours a day is needed to reach the top? If the only reason football players aren't out there practicing 10 hours a day is because there's a physical limit for them, why aren't musicians known for practicing 10-12 hours a day? It's pretty clear that the longer you practice the more your returns diminish, so I think it stands to reason that a shorter practice schedule might actually be more optimal. Most of the korean pros have some kind of injury resulting from playing so much, after all. Furthermore, a fair amount of gamers seem to be suffering from depression issues that might be helped by just...playing less and going outside a little more. | ||
Shiori
3815 Posts
| ||
CalmB4theStorm
62 Posts
From jdsutter, CNN representative: "Inspired by your thoughtful comments, I'm going to write a follow-up story on whether the best video gamers should be considered athletes. If you have additional thoughts on this -- how video gamers are the same as/different from Olympians -- please reply to this thread. And thanks!" He also posted about inaccuracies in the original story that were later corrected (after SC2 fans pointed them out in comments). Just so you know, CNN is actually reading these comments. | ||
Radin
United States57 Posts
This article is giving MKP props for being one of the people who channeled his desire to play games into something that has become a positive thing in his life. Unfortunately, there are thousands of people who try exactly what he's doing and fail, and lose all of their non e-relationships along the way. I don't have kids yet, but when I do, I can guarantee you I wouldn't want them spending 20 hours per day playing video games. I'd much rather they were outside staying fit and building lasting relationships. But, like this article points out, if they are dead-set on becoming a pro-gamer, I would support their efforts (so long as they are sane about it). | ||
AnachronisticAnarchy
United States2957 Posts
Of course, there are things I am against or can nitpick, but what can you expect from someone who thought Kas was a zerg player? If you aren't familiar with the scene, you're definitely going to be unfamiliar with the way things are around here, and are probably going to judge, to one degree or another. Overall, better than I would expect to see from a major news outlet. Looking foward to the next one. | ||
![]()
InsidiA
Canada1169 Posts
| ||
LordOfDabu
United States394 Posts
Gaming addiction is apparently a real problem and I don't see the issue in giving both sides (which this article does). I would actually like to learn more about *why* gaming is such an addicting hobby; I think there's something more to it than games just being fun. The article alludes to it being some sort of escape mechanism ("fantasy") but doesn't really go there. | ||
PrimeTimey
Canada369 Posts
| ||
ampson
United States2355 Posts
| ||
Shiori
3815 Posts
On August 06 2012 05:47 PrimeTimey wrote: This article is good. Not sure why everyone is so butt hurt when the author is trying to show the fine line between pro-gaming and addicts. Because the two aren't actually the same. People see someone doing something a lot and they automatically think "hey! he must be addicted, because that's all he does." No, that is not how it works. | ||
Kordox
Denmark142 Posts
On August 06 2012 06:02 Shiori wrote: Show nested quote + On August 06 2012 05:47 PrimeTimey wrote: This article is good. Not sure why everyone is so butt hurt when the author is trying to show the fine line between pro-gaming and addicts. Because the two aren't actually the same. People see someone doing something a lot and they automatically think "hey! he must be addicted, because that's all he does." No, that is not how it works. So you agree with the article. | ||
MooMooMugi
United States10531 Posts
"Relatively unknown player Ukrainian player Kas" -also mentions he played Zerg LOL "MKP won a tournament in 2009 that certified him as an official progamer" - Doesn't mention this was a Starcraft ONE Courage tournament "MKP hugs his teammate MVP" - Uhh they're on separate teams | ||
Oboeman
Canada3980 Posts
Do we really *know* that practicing 10 hours a day is needed to reach the top? If the only reason football players aren't out there practicing 10 hours a day is because there's a physical limit for them, why aren't musicians known for practicing 10-12 hours a day? It's pretty clear that the longer you practice the more your returns diminish, so I think it stands to reason that a shorter practice schedule might actually be more optimal. Most of the korean pros have some kind of injury resulting from playing so much, after all. Furthermore, a fair amount of gamers seem to be suffering from depression issues that might be helped by just...playing less and going outside a little more. Musicians have a physical limit as well, and it depends on the instrument. Many talented musicians have ruined their career by over-practicing and injuring themselves. The article is not nearly as biased as some of you guys make it out to be. I read it more as MKP's triumphant rise to the top and how his family came together for him than anything really stigmatizing gaming lol me too. The stories from his childhood are definitely something that parents would worry about, but it also means that in marineking's case it worked out well. Just because it worked out for him doesn't mean that every kid who stops going to school to play video games for 20 hours a day is going to be a successful pro-gamer. The psychologist's distinction at the end is important. If you want even more balance, look at the two stories (MVP and MKP) together as a whole. The MVP one touches on a lot more positives as well. | ||
SpyKe_
France17 Posts
For instance,I was deeply shocked by these few lines: MarineKing's competitor was DarKFoRce, from Germany, whose oily hair and sleep-deprived face made him look like the American stereotype of an obsessed video game player. Such an article is highly degrading and disrespectfull regarding MarineKing & MVP. | ||
Frex
Finland888 Posts
| ||
Shiori
3815 Posts
On August 06 2012 06:06 Kordox wrote: Show nested quote + On August 06 2012 06:02 Shiori wrote: On August 06 2012 05:47 PrimeTimey wrote: This article is good. Not sure why everyone is so butt hurt when the author is trying to show the fine line between pro-gaming and addicts. Because the two aren't actually the same. People see someone doing something a lot and they automatically think "hey! he must be addicted, because that's all he does." No, that is not how it works. So you agree with the article. The article is nebulous because it's not clear what the author is actually trying to say. Up until the comments from Dr. Han, it seems like the author really wants to say that progaming is intimately associated with addiction ("dark side of gaming," MKP typing "go" somehow implicating addiction etc. etc.). The problem I have with this isn't that the article is necessarily saying something incorrect, but that it's not balanced. You can't write page after page heavily implying that there is a dark side to progaming and that it probably has something to do with addiction and then write a short paragraph about the plausible alternative. My gripe has less to do with the conclusion being right or wrong and more to do with the fact that the article is simply written in uneven proportion. If you want to write something expository, then you have to give both sides equal time and plausibility. You can't imply one side for the vast majority of the article (and for virtually all of the narrative voice) and then include a sort of addendum addressing the other side at the end. It's not really fair because one side is overrepresented. It's kinda like if you talked about some politician's bill and went on and on expressing how it might result in some really awful consequences, or how it might be abused, or how people are concerned about it, and then at the very end you include a small statement from someone else saying that these complaints are based on a misreading of the bill. It's not very effective, it's not really fair to either position, and it's simply incomplete journalism. I love that the author is willing to amend his article though. The follow-up was much more even. | ||
Cheerio
Ukraine3178 Posts
| ||
MrF
United States320 Posts
| ||
Chocobo
United States1108 Posts
![]() | ||
Shiori
3815 Posts
On August 06 2012 06:36 MrF wrote: I think the reason why so many people are, as some have put it "butt-hurt" about this article is that there is basically zero mainstream coverage of the sc2 pro scene and this has a very negative feel about it for the most part. If this was just one of many mainstream news coverages then it wouldnt be such a big deal. The fact is that now a whole lot of people who have never heard of pro-gaming are being first exposed to it by a mis-informed and slightly derogatory article which portrays an esports hero as some sort of devient gaming obsessed freak. Kinda this. I guess it's more that I feel it's a little like reading a slightly right-wing media outlet's opinion of a slightly left-wing policy. Even if they say they're being expository, there tends to be an overabundance of negative emphasis and very little weight given to positive emphasis. Just look at the way this article was written, even. All of the negative descriptions have tonnes of imagery and literary devices. The token positive stuff at the end is just "and this guy said it might not be bad." There's no weight behind it, or at least it doesn't feel like there is. (Also the title is completely ridiculous and is yellow journalism to the core). | ||
Not_Computer
Canada2277 Posts
I'd offer but my writing isn't that great and I don't know as much about SC2 as most of the people posting in this thread. | ||
Shiori
3815 Posts
On August 06 2012 06:41 Not_Computer wrote: I challenge someone from the SC2 community to rewrite this article in the exact same format but in a more informed manner from the perspective of the SC2 community. I'd offer but my writing isn't that great and I don't know as much about SC2 as most of the people posting in this thread. I would, but I don't have the ability to actually interview psychologists and progamers on the subject of addiction. Honestly, though, the guy who wrote this is a good writer. The article just needed to have more of the positive points of progaming to balance out the negatives if it wanted to be really objective. And, what's more, he knows that some of the criticism is warranted, so he's doing a follow-up. Kudos to him for that. Many journalists would be more inclined to use criticism as proof of erroneous conclusions. | ||
Not_Computer
Canada2277 Posts
On August 06 2012 06:42 Shiori wrote: Show nested quote + On August 06 2012 06:41 Not_Computer wrote: I challenge someone from the SC2 community to rewrite this article in the exact same format but in a more informed manner from the perspective of the SC2 community. I'd offer but my writing isn't that great and I don't know as much about SC2 as most of the people posting in this thread. I would, but I don't have the ability to actually interview psychologists and progamers on the subject of addiction. Honestly, though, the guy who wrote this is a good writer. The article just needed to have more of the positive points of progaming to balance out the negatives if it wanted to be really objective. And, what's more, he knows that some of the criticism is warranted, so he's doing a follow-up. Kudos to him for that. Many journalists would be more inclined to use criticism as proof of erroneous conclusions. I guess I should have clarified, I didn't expect anyone from the TL community to go out and interview psychologists and progamers on the subject of addiction. I didn't expect anyone to research peer reviewed medical journals or even call up the centre for addiction. What you said is what I want, which is "The article just needed to have more of the positive points of progaming to balance out the negatives if it wanted to be really objective." Although I didn't know he was doing a follow-up, so I guess I'll have to keep an eye out for that. edit: spelllling | ||
jmbthirteen
United States10734 Posts
On August 06 2012 06:37 Chocobo wrote: This story is now on the front page of CNN.com. ![]() that picture right there.... most people going to cnn.com aren't going to read the story, all they are going to see is that. great job cnn! that picture is worse than the fucking story | ||
Cheerio
Ukraine3178 Posts
| ||
Shiori
3815 Posts
On August 06 2012 06:50 Cheerio wrote: Sex and masturbation is an addiction. Most people keep doing that over and over for the most of their lives. It takes up huge amount of time and energy. People expose their genitalia while doing this, take weird poses and overall look disgusting. It is a shameful activity that has basicly no benefit for the individual or society whatsoever (well besides sex for breeding purposes, if you are doing that its ok). Stop sex and masturbation before it turned us into pleasure addicts. Most people are not compulsive masturbators, much like most people aren't compulsive videogame players! MKP seems to have played Sc2 because he enjoyed it, not because he was compelled to do it. If you've ever met anyone with serious OCD, addiction kinda looks like that, except oriented around one thing to the exclusion of all others. ( i know you were being sarcastic, btw). | ||
ridethecatbus
United States64 Posts
This wasn't something thrown together in two weeks. I'm only left with the conclusion that this was intentional. I think that's what pisses me off the most. | ||
Hyperionnn
Turkey4968 Posts
Would you enjoy when your child was playing any computer game 16+ hours a day? By the way, if you spend your 5 hours a day studying on your classes, its fine; if you spend on any sort of sports, its fine but overplaying a computer game is just plain waste of time and you guys have to admit that truth. | ||
KillingVector
United States96 Posts
Second, the article has misrepresented the "addiction." Its a fact that people have wasted their life on games like WoW, and I'll bet there exist some circumstances involving Starcraft. I can't speak for MMORPG's, but what makes Starcraft great for me is the feeling of winning and improving. This is something that occurs in all sports and facets of life. People like to win. The game is just the vehicle. Statements like He quietly unpacked his keyboard at another station and, like a swimmer cooling down in a lap pool -- or an addict looking for one more fix -- started playing the game all over again. He found opponents outside the tournament who would play him on the Internet, sometimes at random. seems to imply that the author thinks that playing the game itself is whats addicting and driving players. I would tend to think that it is winning. The desire to win is usually not called an "addiction." For example, if a kid skipped school or was delinquent in his studies to play basketball, most people would have a lot to say about such a kid. The word "addiction" wouldn't be one of them. Edit: I'm pretty sure that author doesn't really care about e-sports and just used the opportunity of writing the article as a paid vacation to Korea. | ||
tskarzyn
United States516 Posts
On August 06 2012 06:58 Hyperionnn wrote: I'm pretty sure that people here are here mad but I have a one single question. Would you enjoy when your child when he was playing any computer game 16+ hours a day? By the way, if you spend your 5 hours studying on your classes, its fine; if you spend on any sort of sports, its fine but overplaying a computer game is just plain waste of time and you guys have to admit that truth. You aren't going to get rational answers given the demographic... I mean ffs,MKP was sneaking out of bed at all hours of the night to play broodwar, and this is after the hours of gaming he put in at PC Bangs when he should have been studying or socializing. Yea, he made it, but the story would be much uglier if he wasn't good enough to go pro. | ||
Acritter
Syria7637 Posts
| ||
Hyperionnn
Turkey4968 Posts
On August 06 2012 07:06 tskarzyn wrote: Show nested quote + On August 06 2012 06:58 Hyperionnn wrote: I'm pretty sure that people here are here mad but I have a one single question. Would you enjoy when your child when he was playing any computer game 16+ hours a day? By the way, if you spend your 5 hours studying on your classes, its fine; if you spend on any sort of sports, its fine but overplaying a computer game is just plain waste of time and you guys have to admit that truth. You aren't going to get rational answers given the demographic... I mean ffs,MKP was sneaking out of bed at all hours of the night to play broodwar, and this is after the hours of gaming he put in at PC Bangs when he should have been studying or socializing. Yea, he made it, but the story would be much uglier if he wasn't good enough to go pro. By the way, how did I write those horrible sentences, I guess I should go to sleep (: (Screw the finals at the summer time though) | ||
Shantastic
United States435 Posts
But CNNi, being very professional, made amendments and was receptive to criticism. So I'm happy. Funnily enough, my least favorite part of the article was Tasteless' comments. Keep your pitchforks in; I protest peacefully. But as a universal gamer, I was frustrated by Tasteless' implications. Addicts and competitive gamers are not mutually exclusive. I am as competitive in SC as anyone, and I've been addicted to WoW before and obsessed with TF2 and SC2 (I missed so many classes and so much sleep because I was hooked to 4v4s in my first year at college). WoW is an eSport, no matter how smugly we say "oh, but...strategy, and...mechanics *blow cigar smoke*", and has plenty of professional Arena players, many of whom I'm sure don't eat super-healthy or have outstanding social lives. SC2 has plenty of addicts, who also probably have varying diets and levels of social activity. Divisive comments like those are actually not good for the growth of eSports, of which StarCraft II is but a fraction. | ||
Vestrel
Canada271 Posts
http://www.cnn.com/2012/08/05/tech/gaming-gadgets/esport-athletes-gaming-south-korea/index.html | ||
LGStarcraft
United States40 Posts
| ||
Hyperionnn
Turkey4968 Posts
On August 06 2012 07:27 LGStarcraft wrote: Video games are but one of many forms of addiction in society, and I find it somewhat unfair that these news programs are putting the spotlight solely on videogames. Of course anything in excess is bad, but its not like videogames are worse than drug trafficking or prostitution. JUS' SAYIN. The problem is, you cant compare videogames with a normal stuff even though you are horribly biased. JUS' SAYIN. | ||
KillingVector
United States96 Posts
On August 06 2012 07:26 Vestrel wrote: The writer did a follow-up to give a topic for discussion rather than just letting people squabble about whatever they like on the other page. http://www.cnn.com/2012/08/05/tech/gaming-gadgets/esport-athletes-gaming-south-korea/index.html Except the discussion about the article isn't whether pro gamers should be classified as "athletes." It is for the most part about whether their long practice sessions are the result of an addiction or dedication. The author is going to shift the discussion to semantics by just using a crappy title for his follow up article. | ||
Chytilova
United States790 Posts
On August 06 2012 06:37 Chocobo wrote: This story is now on the front page of CNN.com. + Show Spoiler + ![]() :O There is a shooting that killed 6 in Wisconsin, but this is the big front page story. Wow. | ||
bearhug
United States999 Posts
Fair enough. | ||
Vestrel
Canada271 Posts
On August 06 2012 07:36 KillingVector wrote: Show nested quote + On August 06 2012 07:26 Vestrel wrote: The writer did a follow-up to give a topic for discussion rather than just letting people squabble about whatever they like on the other page. http://www.cnn.com/2012/08/05/tech/gaming-gadgets/esport-athletes-gaming-south-korea/index.html Except the discussion about the article isn't whether pro gamers should be classified as "athletes." It is for the most part about whether their long practice sessions are the result of an addiction or dedication. The author is going to shift the discussion to semantics by just using a crappy title for his follow up article. Right, too late to edit now but I guess the more accurate thing to say would be "to give another topic for discussion." | ||
KillingVector
United States96 Posts
On August 06 2012 07:40 Vestrel wrote: Show nested quote + On August 06 2012 07:36 KillingVector wrote: On August 06 2012 07:26 Vestrel wrote: The writer did a follow-up to give a topic for discussion rather than just letting people squabble about whatever they like on the other page. http://www.cnn.com/2012/08/05/tech/gaming-gadgets/esport-athletes-gaming-south-korea/index.html Except the discussion about the article isn't whether pro gamers should be classified as "athletes." It is for the most part about whether their long practice sessions are the result of an addiction or dedication. The author is going to shift the discussion to semantics by just using a crappy title for his follow up article. Right, too late to edit now but I guess the more accurate thing to say would be "to give another topic for discussion." Its not your fault. The author calls it "a follow-up story based on some of your comments" in one of his comments. I think it just shows how much the author doesn't really get it. Either that, or he's secretly a bnet forum troll who was tired of dragging up this old "athletes" argument on the bnet forums and decided to go for the big time. | ||
Noocta
France12578 Posts
Wasn't expecting much but seriously, they're professionals, not addict. edit : just saw the follow up article. Nice. I tweeted to the guy some good feedback about that. The gaming community can be a bit harsh sometimes but we know how to forget people if they redeem themselves. =) | ||
IMABUNNEH
United Kingdom1062 Posts
| ||
Bippzy
United States1466 Posts
Also, go seemed like an indicative sign of addiction, but its actually BFD in the gamig community. Plus " he plays not because he wants to, but has to." seems a little too over the top. Is marinekings past weighing on him at wcg? Probably not as much as this article makes it out to be: This article is disliked in my mind because it makes a "philosophical" question about gaming and then discusses it using MKP and statistics and government actions..it all paints the wrong picture | ||
FSKi
United States901 Posts
| ||
Klipsys
United States1533 Posts
| ||
Ribbon
United States5278 Posts
MVP, whose parents saw that he wasn't excelling in school and enrolled him in an after-school academy for "StarCraft" players because they wanted him to go pro Can we put aside the CNN is hurting e-sports discussion for just one moment and appreciate how amazing this is. MVP literally went to Starcraft school because that was the career his parents wanted him to enter. And also, that, much like Yu-Gi-Oh, there are literally Starcraft schools. That blew my mind a little. | ||
Executor1
1353 Posts
On August 06 2012 07:29 Hyperionnn wrote: Show nested quote + On August 06 2012 07:27 LGStarcraft wrote: Video games are but one of many forms of addiction in society, and I find it somewhat unfair that these news programs are putting the spotlight solely on videogames. Of course anything in excess is bad, but its not like videogames are worse than drug trafficking or prostitution. JUS' SAYIN. The problem is, you cant compare videogames with a normal stuff even though you are horribly biased. JUS' SAYIN. Comments like this highlight the stigma around video games. So video games aren't "normal" stuff?. I dont know any males that are between the ages of 15-30 that dont play video games to some extent (be it a little or alot) sounds pretty normal to me. Not to mention with the rise of mobile gaming that number is becoming even greater and as mobile games get more complex the difference between conventional and mobile gaming is becoming less obvious. | ||
Tuluum
1 Post
On August 06 2012 08:16 Ribbon wrote: there are literally Starcraft schools. That blew my mind a little. I found that pretty interesting as well! I actually enjoyed the article. I have watched e-sports evolve from before video games themselves were really competitive. I think the article shows pretty clearly that those who are "outside" the social rings are not just writing it off anymore. The article quite obviously gives credence to esports being legitimate. I would venture a guess that the journalists preconceived bias was challenged greatly in writing the article, however, it still colored it. When games first started, they were really just seen as a kids thing. When those kids grew up, and didnt stop playing, that started to shift the culture into being more widely accepted. I have a feeling that when the kids of those kids are grown, or perhaps even the next generation, the idea of video games truly being a sport will be unquestioned. The issue with sports in general is that they are relatively useless beyond the revunue they create. The revenue is what lends them legitimacy. As we continue to see revenues increase in e-sports, I suspect that will be directly proportional to their perceived legitimacy by the general populous. Of course, the idea of addiction is present with video games just as much as anything else in life. Anything we do, especially on a daily basis, can turn into a habit which then can very easily turn into a psychological addiction. IMO, this lack of moderation is an issue across the board when it affects quality of life. However, culturally, it is only seen as an issue when it does not generate income. | ||
Executor1
1353 Posts
On August 06 2012 01:41 Shiori wrote: Show nested quote + On August 06 2012 01:38 Rah wrote: On August 06 2012 01:27 jeeeeohn wrote: On August 05 2012 14:25 Itsmedudeman wrote: On August 05 2012 14:21 Wegandi wrote: On August 05 2012 14:18 Zzoram wrote: Where are the articles about American Football addiction and how 4 players die each year from football on average, never mind the thousands of concussions that can lead to permanent brain damage? It's only an addiction when they disagree with your personal behavior. If you play a physical sport like say, football, or baseball for 5+ hours everyday, you're lauded. If you study math or science for 10+ hours a day, you're lauded. God forbid, you were a unique individual with their own likes and desires instead of some tabula rasa for them to mold to their own ends. Never ceases, does it? ? Dumb comparison. Most people can't play physical sports as long for as long as someone can play a video game (and addicts can play all day), and someone who studies actually benefits from it? Wtf? Are we really comparing the productivity of studying math and science to that of playing a video game here? Let me know how that looks on a college application. TL is really out of touch it seems these days.. Thank you for writing this because if I had I'd probably have gotten a warning or temp ban. TL is insane nowadays, which is really just representative of the culture in general wherein wasting time has somehow evolved into productivity. Newsflash: headline: every pro player is addicted to the game and video games are not art and video games are not productive, at all, ever, not now or in the future. You are not a special snowflake for grinding Starcraft 2 into the soft bits of your brain twelve hours a day. Go read a book or something. It's truth that there's no difference between grinding SC2 12 hrs a day and any other game or MMO out there. There's a pro scene but that's a huge amount of time wasted for someone who never ends up being a pro. On the other hand pro SC2 does have a place in the world and the top few players will always be revered by some. For people who don't care about the game though they're more likely to form an opinion similar to CNN. I believe gaming is a bad habit more than it is an addiction. If you could go pro at biting your nails all day it would be comparable. If anything, this shows you've been infected by some sort of pragmatism rather than that videogaming is 'bad.' I always laugh when people criticize gaming on the grounds of 'productivity' while failing to consider that productivity for productivity's sake is completely arbitrary, and is only something that people have argued for in the post-narrative era we live in. Seriously, productivity is probably the god of this generation (i.e. last 20 years). It's sad, and it's arbitrary, and I wish people would shut up about it. Agreed the same thing could be said for almost every activity depending on someones point of view. "Playing Soccer 8 hours a day is a huge waste of time if your not going to go pro". And sure it is healthy to exercise your body to a certain extent but your not going to be that much better off doing it 8 hours a day compared to 1 or 2 in terms of body health(diminishing returns). The same can be said for starcraft it is exercise for your brain and it can train your reflexes. Its completely arbitrary as you say, something that seems productive to one person seems like a waste of time to another, there is no right or wrong but unless you are training towards something most things are usually better in moderation. | ||
FairForever
Canada2392 Posts
On August 06 2012 08:11 Bippzy wrote: I think the article has much to go in storyline. Saying marineking won in 8 minutes should not be "he won in just 8 minutes" it should be more like "he executed a well disguised rush and caught his opponent off guard. Also, go seemed like an indicative sign of addiction, but its actually BFD in the gamig community. Plus " he plays not because he wants to, but has to." seems a little too over the top. Is marinekings past weighing on him at wcg? Probably not as much as this article makes it out to be: This article is disliked in my mind because it makes a "philosophical" question about gaming and then discusses it using MKP and statistics and government actions..it all paints the wrong picture What are you talking about? Rush? People who don't play video games don't know what a rush is. Nor do they understand how you disguise something. I thought the article was extremely well-written - it brought both sides of the argument, the good and bad of gaming. I think people here focus way too much on the addiction side, which is actually, sadly, an issue (because some people are addicted to gaming - this is not necessarily good). Yes there are other non-gaming examples of bad addictions (eg. athletics) but that's not the point of this article. | ||
Executor1
1353 Posts
On August 06 2012 04:51 Nos- wrote: The article is not nearly as biased as some of you guys make it out to be. I read it more as MKP's triumphant rise to the top and how his family came together for him than anything really stigmatizing gaming lol I feel like alot of the people criticizing the article simply just read the title or at the very least didnt read it from top to bottom. The coverage of MVP was all positive, the coverage of MKP was like investigative with a conclusion in the end that pro gamers arent considered addicts because they are working towards something positive and have a will to succeed. It also portrayed the difference between MVP's parents who supported his gaming and where the ones who enrolled him in starcraft academy when he wasnt getting good grades in school, they wanted him to go pro. Then there is MKP's parents who forbade him from playing games and even beat him occasionally to stop him, and how his drive to become a pro gamer made him go behind there backs and get to playing and practicing despite what his parents thought. | ||
SilSol
Sweden2744 Posts
| ||
Alryk
United States2718 Posts
Can somebody link the follow up article? Edit: Page 14 | ||
Cinquedea
Canada144 Posts
| ||
Belisarius
Australia6230 Posts
For those who didn't make it to the end, there's actually this: After the tournament, I talked with the psychologist, Dr. Han, about gaming addiction in Korea. I described MarineKing's training habits, and his personal story. He said the number of hours and the intensity with which he approaches "StarCraft II" borders on addiction. But there's one difference, he said. Pro gamers usually aren't addicts. Addicts can't succeed on a higher competitive level, he said. The game takes complete control. Pros, however, find a magical balance. They're obsessed with the game, maybe, but their playing of it isn't depressive, meandering and hopeless. They're chasing after a goal. ...but it's completely out of sync with everything else there. It's a very confused piece of journalism. On the one hand, the message at the end is quite sympathetic, showing how MKP's parents came around and how MVP won the the WCG for KR, and suggesting that pro-gamers are different to typical addicts. But the writer never really does away with the MKP-as-obsessive-messed-up-jittery-addict-banging-on-a-black-keyboard schtick. Very odd. | ||
Xiphos
Canada7507 Posts
Since the game was at its height and that the Korean (asian culture in general) have this mentality of excelling at everything they do, parents were signing up their sons into the team house with alacrity. So it is not far fetched that the journalist mentioned the "StarCraft School" in the article. | ||
Doodsmack
United States7224 Posts
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=349692 There are a disturbing number of people saying they sacrificed their social lives, friends and girlfriends. This shit happens to video games players, regardless of whether you're playing competitively to improve or you're playing a MMO. But I realize this is almost off topic since the author oddly focused on progamers rather than the legitimate broader issue of video game addiction. | ||
dynwar7
1983 Posts
MarineKing's competitor was DarKFoRce, from Germany, whose oily hair and sleep-deprived face made him look like the American stereotype of an obsessed video game player. What the hell is that? I had to laugh.....but why did CNN have to say that? Seriously? What media manipulation... | ||
Rad
United States935 Posts
Oh god, korea is total loser-ville. These aren't men and never will be. Just pathetic little boys addicted to video games. It's great to want to be good at something, but chasing a pro career in video games is just a bit pathetic. And what happens once starcraft is an old game? All those hours and time spent playing, for absolutely nothing. No real-world gains. No real-world wisdom, lessons, experience, or anything. But there will always be the next video game to master - it's just you don't have to grow as a person whatsoever to master it. Such a narrow, pointless existence It doesn't matter how much money these freaks make playing video games. They have already forfeited their humanity. They are evolutionary losers. They will never reproduce. They are invisible to me. I see right through them. Some quotes from the comments, just minutes apart... Anyone else get completely disappointed in humanity (I know, cliche) when reading comments like these (which are the majority there)? I can't help but feel just... yeah, disappointed is the right word, but something more extreme, like disappointed x 1000 and can't bear to read any more. I hope they're trolls, for their sake. Also, terrible terrible article, and then the author tries to act like he wants to support the scene in the comments. Terrible. | ||
Rabiator
Germany3948 Posts
Are you playing the game "for fun" for 14 hours (or anything more than 3 hours IMO) a day OR are you doing that "for work"? If you are playing Starcraft as a job you will have - most likely - stopped most of the fun feeling for it and play because you have to improve yourself. That would be quite acceptable ... if many of the korean kids werent teenagers / minors. I hope Korea has laws against child labour too. The problem is that you can too easily declare playing Starcraft as "for fun" and that's where it gets bad, because you are kinda deluding yourself. The addiction starts when you just play for fun AND you do it for too many hours. "Too many" is a rather flexible term, but a child has to learn certain things during its teens and developing social skills is one of them. You can only do that with real people face-to-face and thus you have to "go out and meet them". Computer kids have a tendency to stay home - which is very practical for the parents - and only meet people online. You dont learn to recognize emotions in others online and that is something very important. Thus playing computer (any game) for too long as a kid/teenager is BAD. Please dont make any comparisons with real sports, because it isnt possible to play them for as long as you can play computer games. | ||
LordOfDabu
United States394 Posts
| ||
Dosey
United States4505 Posts
On August 06 2012 13:12 dynwar7 wrote: + Show Spoiler + MarineKing's competitor was DarKFoRce, from Germany, whose oily hair and sleep-deprived face made him look like the American stereotype of an obsessed video game player. What the hell is that? I had to laugh.....but why did CNN have to say that? Seriously? What media manipulation... Thank god Nony wasn't playing MKP. The reporters head would fucking explode trying to find a way to insult that handsome man. | ||
Kaitokid
Germany1327 Posts
On August 06 2012 13:12 dynwar7 wrote: + Show Spoiler + MarineKing's competitor was DarKFoRce, from Germany, whose oily hair and sleep-deprived face made him look like the American stereotype of an obsessed video game player. What the hell is that? I had to laugh.....but why did CNN have to say that? Seriously? What media manipulation... this comment alone made me lose all my respect for CNN, what a disgrace... | ||
Caihead
Canada8550 Posts
On August 06 2012 16:26 Kaitokid wrote: Show nested quote + On August 06 2012 13:12 dynwar7 wrote: + Show Spoiler + MarineKing's competitor was DarKFoRce, from Germany, whose oily hair and sleep-deprived face made him look like the American stereotype of an obsessed video game player. What the hell is that? I had to laugh.....but why did CNN have to say that? Seriously? What media manipulation... this comment alone made me lose all my respect for CNN, what a disgrace... CNN went down the tubes sometime in the early 2000s, even though it's still probably the most respectable US news source for international audiences... which says something. | ||
Sutekhy
43 Posts
On August 06 2012 13:38 Rad wrote: Show nested quote + Oh god, korea is total loser-ville. These aren't men and never will be. Just pathetic little boys addicted to video games. It's great to want to be good at something, but chasing a pro career in video games is just a bit pathetic. And what happens once starcraft is an old game? All those hours and time spent playing, for absolutely nothing. No real-world gains. No real-world wisdom, lessons, experience, or anything. But there will always be the next video game to master - it's just you don't have to grow as a person whatsoever to master it. Such a narrow, pointless existence Show nested quote + It doesn't matter how much money these freaks make playing video games. They have already forfeited their humanity. They are evolutionary losers. They will never reproduce. They are invisible to me. I see right through them. Some quotes from the comments, just minutes apart... Anyone else get completely disappointed in humanity (I know, cliche) when reading comments like these (which are the majority there)? I can't help but feel just... yeah, disappointed is the right word, but something more extreme, like disappointed x 1000 and can't bear to read any more. I hope they're trolls, for their sake. Also, terrible terrible article, and then the author tries to act like he wants to support the scene in the comments. Terrible. The majority of people commenting on news articles such as these are just people that have long since removed themselves from the company of sane normal people and breach in to the realm of unwarranted hatred. It's not just this way on an e-sports article. These comments are everywhere on every article. You read an article about an up and coming sports player who went through trouble and the comments read right along those lines. Don't invest too much thought in to what 10-20 random assholes think on the internet. | ||
Hyperionnn
Turkey4968 Posts
On August 06 2012 08:34 Executor1 wrote: Show nested quote + On August 06 2012 07:29 Hyperionnn wrote: On August 06 2012 07:27 LGStarcraft wrote: Video games are but one of many forms of addiction in society, and I find it somewhat unfair that these news programs are putting the spotlight solely on videogames. Of course anything in excess is bad, but its not like videogames are worse than drug trafficking or prostitution. JUS' SAYIN. The problem is, you cant compare videogames with a normal stuff even though you are horribly biased. JUS' SAYIN. Comments like this highlight the stigma around video games. So video games aren't "normal" stuff?. I dont know any males that are between the ages of 15-30 that dont play video games to some extent (be it a little or alot) sounds pretty normal to me. Not to mention with the rise of mobile gaming that number is becoming even greater and as mobile games get more complex the difference between conventional and mobile gaming is becoming less obvious. Arghhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh Cant you read the guys post that I quoted, its about addiction and yes, video game addiction is basically one of the worst addictions. I have an easy question, which one would you choose? Your son/daughter practices a sport 10 hours per day. Your son/daughter studies on his/her classes 10 hours per day. Your son/daughter plays videogames 10 hours per day. Although the first 2 options are not that pleasant either, most of the people will pick 1st or 2nd option, only some video game addicts will go for 3rd. | ||
kusto
Russian Federation823 Posts
| ||
JeanLuc
Canada377 Posts
On August 06 2012 13:38 Rad wrote: Show nested quote + Oh god, korea is total loser-ville. These aren't men and never will be. Just pathetic little boys addicted to video games. It's great to want to be good at something, but chasing a pro career in video games is just a bit pathetic. And what happens once starcraft is an old game? All those hours and time spent playing, for absolutely nothing. No real-world gains. No real-world wisdom, lessons, experience, or anything. But there will always be the next video game to master - it's just you don't have to grow as a person whatsoever to master it. Such a narrow, pointless existence Show nested quote + It doesn't matter how much money these freaks make playing video games. They have already forfeited their humanity. They are evolutionary losers. They will never reproduce. They are invisible to me. I see right through them. Some quotes from the comments, just minutes apart... Anyone else get completely disappointed in humanity (I know, cliche) when reading comments like these (which are the majority there)? I can't help but feel just... yeah, disappointed is the right word, but something more extreme, like disappointed x 1000 and can't bear to read any more. I hope they're trolls, for their sake. Also, terrible terrible article, and then the author tries to act like he wants to support the scene in the comments. Terrible. I totally sympathize with you here. Moments like these make me grieve for humanity. Just take comfort in the fact that in the future esports will be respected a lot more imo. | ||
Technique
Netherlands1542 Posts
I thought dutch news was bad :D. | ||
FrosTByTe11
United States21 Posts
I believe there are such things as gaming addiction, but the article misrepresented the difference between addiction and striving for excellence. Therefore, I don't believe Marineking was really hiding anything to his parents when he was playing a lot of games or in the author's word, distinguishing himself from the dark side of gaming by playing in the WCG, because he was already trying to get better to try and establish his career as a progamer. In order to become the greatest programer or really anything else for that matter, one must dedicate themselves to work hard to reach that goal and that's where you will see that 10+ hour commitment to a single video game. In fact, some progamers don't see themselves playing video game, but they see it as their work. So therefore, comparing gaming addiction to competitive playing is not really a good comparison because that's like saying people who go to work for 10+ hours must have working addiction. Some say that playing Starcraft is not comparable to real sports as people who play real sports don't practice that long. Well, I do beg to differ from that opinion. A person might not be playing a game of basketball, football, or baseball all the time, but they do spend a lot of hours drilling, working out, stretching, watching game footage to improve oneself. The same can be said for competitive programers. They don't just play the game for hours on straight, but they watch replays, they workout to improve their mentality, they practice different build orders, they practice micro/macro, and they discuss strategies to improve themselves mentally and physically for the game. If you compare practice of real sports in a professional setting and compare practice of video games of professional setting, you would see that they are about the same amount of time, roughly around 6-8 hours or so. To be reasonable, the point of view the author is trying to make is not to confuse the two and although some of the depictions from the article is quite erroneous, he did try to make an attempt by distinguishing the difference in Marineking's setting and a gaming addict's setting. He described WCG and just a normal PC bang, and the author distinguished the game that Marineking is playing and the game that the addict is playing. He also distinguished the goals of each gamer and used that to make an argument. Unfortunately, in the actual article, competing to win and addiction is all jammed into one page called "gaming addiction". To me, that just destroyed whatever point the author was trying to make about competitive gaming and making the entire story viewed in a negative light of addiction. If he really wanted to showcase the difference between the two, why didn't he make another tab called "gaming and sports/competition". I would not have disagreed with the article provided that they would separate these two because you can't compare apples to oranges. While the similarity is apparent (playing video games for a long period of time), the actual difference between the two is, I believe, tremendous. | ||
Snowbear
Korea (South)1925 Posts
On August 06 2012 13:38 Rad wrote: Show nested quote + Oh god, korea is total loser-ville. These aren't men and never will be. Just pathetic little boys addicted to video games. It's great to want to be good at something, but chasing a pro career in video games is just a bit pathetic. And what happens once starcraft is an old game? All those hours and time spent playing, for absolutely nothing. No real-world gains. No real-world wisdom, lessons, experience, or anything. But there will always be the next video game to master - it's just you don't have to grow as a person whatsoever to master it. Such a narrow, pointless existence Show nested quote + It doesn't matter how much money these freaks make playing video games. They have already forfeited their humanity. They are evolutionary losers. They will never reproduce. They are invisible to me. I see right through them. Some quotes from the comments, just minutes apart... Anyone else get completely disappointed in humanity (I know, cliche) when reading comments like these (which are the majority there)? I can't help but feel just... yeah, disappointed is the right word, but something more extreme, like disappointed x 1000 and can't bear to read any more. I hope they're trolls, for their sake. Also, terrible terrible article, and then the author tries to act like he wants to support the scene in the comments. Terrible. These comments come from people that hate things they don't know about. I wouldn't be surprised if they were rooting for their favourite soccer or tennis player. After all you get don't get more real-world wisdom, lessons, experience by playing tennis or soccer (imo). | ||
yeint
Estonia2329 Posts
On August 05 2012 16:08 Bagration wrote: What did you expect this article to be like? To most people in the US, the concept of competitive gaming is very alien, and most people's initial reaction would be something along the lines of "what the hell". I expected the article to have journalistic integrity, I expected the journalist to study the subject of his/her article in-depth, in order to give an informed overview, instead of writing sensationalist schlock looking to make a quick buck off the ignorance-based fears of the mainstream reader. Okay, I can't keep writing that with a straight face. It's CNN, of course I didn't expect them to have any standards whatsoever. | ||
dynwar7
1983 Posts
Wow, such an interesting story. I feel so sorry for MKP, he had a tough childhood. Moving story also | ||
Kyrillion
Russian Federation748 Posts
I have an easy question, which one would you choose? Your son/daughter practices a sport 10 hours per day. Your son/daughter studies on his/her classes 10 hours per day. Your son/daughter plays videogames 10 hours per day. Although the first 2 options are not that pleasant either, most of the people will pick 1st or 2nd option, only some video game addicts will go for 3rd. Not a very hard question indeed. In the first option, it all depends on the sport but the second one is clearly the worst. Unless we're talking about University, it's fairly astonishing and sad that one could study for 10 hours a day. Thank god Nony wasn't playing MKP. The reporters head would fucking explode trying to find a way to insult that handsome man. Makes you wonder why they chose to show the beauteous Tasteless while introducing him as an ex-progamer. Which debatable, but that's what the viewer will think anyway. | ||
Evangelist
1246 Posts
On August 06 2012 12:31 Doodsmack wrote: While the author may have missed the mark as far as his portrayal of progamers as addicts, I think if the article focused on the topic of video game addiction in general (that is, among the general gaming public rather than progamers) it would be more valid. It's quite clear to me that video game addiction is a real thing. And no you can't call a football or basketball hobby just as addictive as video games. There aren't many people playing baskeball for 14 hours a day, but there are definitely people doing that with video games. Just look at some of the quotes from this thread: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=349692 There are a disturbing number of people saying they sacrificed their social lives, friends and girlfriends. This shit happens to video games players, regardless of whether you're playing competitively to improve or you're playing a MMO. But I realize this is almost off topic since the author oddly focused on progamers rather than the legitimate broader issue of video game addiction. When all the world is trying to tell you that we're all doomed, everything is going to shit, scientists are ignored in favour of political bullcrap, democracy changes nothing, oh and by the way forget ever trying to get a job you enjoy because they're all being exported elsewhere... Does anyone wonder why people get addicted to video games, which offer a real iterative sense of purpose? The mass media is trying to drill youth into the ground and has been doing so for 30 years. I don't blame anyone that retreats into the cocoon of World of Warcraft for half of their youth. | ||
Account252508
3454 Posts
| ||
FrosTByTe11
United States21 Posts
On August 06 2012 18:19 dynwar7 wrote: I just finished reading the whole article. Wow, such an interesting story. I feel so sorry for MKP, he had a tough childhood. Moving story also It was a moving story indeed, but not dissimilar to other progamer stories. The one I remember the most is the story that NatGeo did on Xellos and how his mom disapproved of him playing games and she eventually came to accept him for what he is. | ||
FrogOfWar
Germany1406 Posts
On August 06 2012 13:38 Rad wrote: Also, terrible terrible article, and then the author tries to act like he wants to support the scene in the comments. Terrible. I think it makes a lot of sense to support the scene by putting things into perspective and pointing out issues. As someone who likes games and e-sports, when I read the comments here, I feel the total failure/refusal of many to acknowledge that e-sports isn't necessarily the pure paradise come true and spending all day in front of a computer not necessarily the true fulfilment of human destiny isn't a strength of the community but a weakness. A community deluding itself about reality isn't a strong one and isn't viable in the long run. There simply are two sides to the story. Getting enraged about this notion and insisting that there is only one, yours, doesn't help your cause. If gaming and e-sports are to thrive, the issues of them interfering with health and social life need to be dealt with, not denied. | ||
Kleinmuuhg
Vanuatu4091 Posts
On August 06 2012 18:42 Kyrillion wrote: Show nested quote + I have an easy question, which one would you choose? Your son/daughter practices a sport 10 hours per day. Your son/daughter studies on his/her classes 10 hours per day. Your son/daughter plays videogames 10 hours per day. Although the first 2 options are not that pleasant either, most of the people will pick 1st or 2nd option, only some video game addicts will go for 3rd. Not a very hard question indeed. In the first option, it all depends on the sport but the second one is clearly the worst. Unless we're talking about University, it's fairly astonishing and sad that one could study for 10 hours a day. The second is clearly the worst? I think most parents would disagree. You find it sad that someone works hard for getting good grates in school /university ? Really? Working hard to reach your goals should always be admired, no matter what the goals are. Be it Starcraft, University or a sport. | ||
Account252508
3454 Posts
| ||
Rabiator
Germany3948 Posts
On August 06 2012 17:47 FrosTByTe11 wrote: I think for those saying that video games have nothing to contribute to life is quite false because like anything you do in life, you get something out of it. For example, in Day9's #100 daily, he talked a lot about the things he learned in life relative to his career playing Starcraft. If there is anything that separates a gaming addict and a competitive sports player, I think that video pretty much explain a lot about the differences between the two. Sure, Day[9] has quite some talent at telling stories, but you totally neglect to mention what he also has due to his "Starcraft career": Carpal Tunnel syndrome. Its not fun to have pains in your wrists for the rest of your life just because you didnt care about a correct sitting position (or you didnt have the right chair&table anyways) in your early teens. Just look at all those progamers and carpal tunnel or similar problems are rather widespread. Having such an injury will not make any job involving computers any easier ... Even though Day[9] might have a bright future and sufficient financial security, that isnt guaranteed for 99% of the progamers. Casters can do their jobs much longer than progamers and there arent as many needed for a tournament anyways. So the gist of it is: There is no transition from progamer to any other job ... and this makes any concern about potentially wasting the most important time of your life on something trivial (because you dont produce anything while playing computer games) instead of learning skills which will sustain you for the rest of your life. No progamer will make enough money to be able to sustain himself for 40-50 more years and for that time you need a plan! So while Day[9]'s stories might be entertaining they ARE NOT REPRESENTATIVE! Just remember this in five years and look at what progamers - especially those B-teamers and not-so-successful ones - are doing as a job. Skills learned as a progamer will not help you in any other job ... contrary to regular sports or studying ... and I hope people will stop these useless comparisons. | ||
Fencar
United States2694 Posts
There is no transition from progamer to any other job ... and this makes any concern about potentially wasting the most important time of your life on something trivial (because you dont produce anything while playing computer games) instead of learning skills which will sustain you for the rest of your life. No progamer will make enough money to be able to sustain himself for 40-50 more years and for that time you need a plan! Coaching, off the top of my head. You see pro gamers transition to coaching for various games a lot in my memory. | ||
Hyperionnn
Turkey4968 Posts
On August 06 2012 18:42 Kyrillion wrote: Show nested quote + I have an easy question, which one would you choose? Your son/daughter practices a sport 10 hours per day. Your son/daughter studies on his/her classes 10 hours per day. Your son/daughter plays videogames 10 hours per day. Although the first 2 options are not that pleasant either, most of the people will pick 1st or 2nd option, only some video game addicts will go for 3rd. Not a very hard question indeed. In the first option, it all depends on the sport but the second one is clearly the worst. Unless we're talking about University, it's fairly astonishing and sad that one could study for 10 hours a day. Show nested quote + Thank god Nony wasn't playing MKP. The reporters head would fucking explode trying to find a way to insult that handsome man. Makes you wonder why they chose to show the beauteous Tasteless while introducing him as an ex-progamer. Which debatable, but that's what the viewer will think anyway. It is even more sad one could play some game for 10 hours a day, I guess you are playing around 10 hours as well | ||
Rioo
46 Posts
I have an easy question, which one would you choose? Your son/daughter practices a sport 10 hours per day. Your son/daughter studies on his/her classes 10 hours per day. Your son/daughter plays videogames 10 hours per day. Although the first 2 options are not that pleasant either, most of the people will pick 1st or 2nd option, only some video game addicts will go for 3rd. Wouldn't really want to my kid to do any of those things for 10 hours/day. Like all things you have to take it in moderation. The thing with being a pro playing StarCraft is that you combine work with fun which makes it kinda okay if it really makes you as much money as a normal job would do. I've seen some posts about pro players not having fun while playing the game, but just listen to Real Talk with Naniwa and you'll understand that it's not true. If you're not making money (not being pro at a high enough level) then yes, it's probably not a good idea to play for 10 hours/day. The paradox is, of course, to become pro enough 99% of players need to put those hours into the game. I think the article was really terrible. I don't watch CNN much so I had no idea how unprofessional they were, but now I do. Gaming as much as I've done during my life has really helped me develop a lot of skills and discover talents I didn't know I had, a lot of them used while going through uni to get my Masters in electrical engineering and everyday life. | ||
yeint
Estonia2329 Posts
On August 06 2012 18:55 monkybone wrote: Don't blame the journalist though, his job is creating discussion and grabbing attention. He has definitely succeeded in that. He knows what nerve to hit. That's quite emphatically NOT the job of a journalist. Calling that two-bit hack a "journalist" is pissing on the grave of that once proud profession. | ||
Haustka
United States221 Posts
id say studying is addiction too ![]() | ||
Rabiator
Germany3948 Posts
On August 06 2012 19:06 Fencar wrote: Show nested quote + Coaching, off the top of my head. You see pro gamers transition to coaching for various games a lot in my memory.There is no transition from progamer to any other job ... and this makes any concern about potentially wasting the most important time of your life on something trivial (because you dont produce anything while playing computer games) instead of learning skills which will sustain you for the rest of your life. No progamer will make enough money to be able to sustain himself for 40-50 more years and for that time you need a plan! Coaching and casting jobs are available IN A VERY VERY VERY LIMITED NUMBER. Thus you can NOT get a coaching/casting job for all progamers when their careers are over. Coaches and casters also keep their jobs for more years than a progamer is fit enough to be a progamer. You also need additional knowledge / talents as a coach / caster which only very few progamers will have. Its not the same for regular sports or any form of education. | ||
Talin
Montenegro10532 Posts
On August 06 2012 19:06 Fencar wrote: Show nested quote + Coaching, off the top of my head. You see pro gamers transition to coaching for various games a lot in my memory.There is no transition from progamer to any other job ... and this makes any concern about potentially wasting the most important time of your life on something trivial (because you dont produce anything while playing computer games) instead of learning skills which will sustain you for the rest of your life. No progamer will make enough money to be able to sustain himself for 40-50 more years and for that time you need a plan! You don't see it "a lot" at all. While most coaches and team managers (ones doing things on the team side) are ex-progamers, there simply isn't enough of these jobs available in the first place. And problem with them is that coaching/management jobs also depend on a the same shaky, unreliable branch of entertainment industry. The more I see of the SC2 scene (and some other games), the more I believe that the only sustainable and reasonable way to be involved in progaming is to play part-time while you're at school or working, then if you're good enough take a year off to try to compete at the highest level and make some money, and if you become one of the absolute top players, take another year off, two at most, then promptly return to school/university/work. There is a lot of sides to this topic that need to be considered and discussed. Gaming communities (and more importantly, gaming media) would be taken a lot more seriously if they didn't go nuts every time gaming addiction and problems with gaming careers and industry are mentioned in the mainstream media. The way we react to these topics just feeds into every single stereotype that exists about gamers in general to the point where it isn't really a stereotype in the negative sense of the term, but an accurate description of the gaming culture in general. | ||
Ahelvin
France1866 Posts
Someone hit the nail on the head earlier: the general tone of the article is just way too demeaning to be informative. This is really a shame people feel compelled to write on issue they don't even understand :/. | ||
xHadoken
United States171 Posts
| ||
LlamaNamedOsama
United States1900 Posts
On August 06 2012 08:44 FairForever wrote: Show nested quote + On August 06 2012 08:11 Bippzy wrote: I think the article has much to go in storyline. Saying marineking won in 8 minutes should not be "he won in just 8 minutes" it should be more like "he executed a well disguised rush and caught his opponent off guard. Also, go seemed like an indicative sign of addiction, but its actually BFD in the gamig community. Plus " he plays not because he wants to, but has to." seems a little too over the top. Is marinekings past weighing on him at wcg? Probably not as much as this article makes it out to be: This article is disliked in my mind because it makes a "philosophical" question about gaming and then discusses it using MKP and statistics and government actions..it all paints the wrong picture What are you talking about? Rush? People who don't play video games don't know what a rush is. Nor do they understand how you disguise something. I thought the article was extremely well-written - it brought both sides of the argument, the good and bad of gaming. I think people here focus way too much on the addiction side, which is actually, sadly, an issue (because some people are addicted to gaming - this is not necessarily good). Yes there are other non-gaming examples of bad addictions (eg. athletics) but that's not the point of this article. The article was not well-written. There are countless problems with it, and not simply because it "disses" esports. 1: It demonstrates poor knowledge of its subject content. The description of Terran as humanlike aliens instead of humans (for goodness sake, even the Wikipedia entry for SC races points out that the Terrans are humans exiled for earth. The description of Protoss probes as termites (when the bug-reference confuses Protoss for Zerg; again, see basic wikipedia entry where even the most uninformed can understand that Zerg is the insectoid race, not Protoss). We don't expect these people to give fully informed LR of each game, but at least understand the basic structure of it... 2: Problems with narrative construction. There's no clear timeline or context. The author jumps from 15 year old MKP to contemporary MKP within the same paragraph. I can see what the author is trying to do, going with the redemption story, but too much of the article frames MKP as traversing both ends of the spectrum, but that is a wholly incorrect narrative. MKP really represents only the positive side of the story, not the negative, and the author therefore has to manipulate and twist his narrative to fit his ends, which in this case, means that he distorts the narrative to portray MKP as an addict, which leads to issue #3. Furthermore, the positive aspects of his subject are poorly represented. The article very quickly throws in the mention of fans twice very briefly (once with the fan offering a gift, the other MKP's tweet). No mention is made of the culture which inspired MKP to pursue pro-gaming, or the fanbase which is part of the addendum. This is an important fact to recognize because the distinction between addiction and legitimacy is often drawn in the lens of "anti-social" or social tendencies, and clearly, the interactive nature of esports as a cultural occurrence is reflective of the positive, and not the negative. 3: The author excessively and repeatedly goes overboard with his insertion of personal interpretation, instead of objective fact. Of course, this is worsened by a clear bias one side,negatively portraying esports. Whether intentional or not, as it may simply be a social attitude subconsciously engrained, it still is poor journalistic quality. This one is the most blatant problem with the article, and the examples are numerous. A. the narrative distortion of #2 is clearly the author's intent when his general view is stated near the beginning of the article with these lines: "It's a place that's home to the world's finest "e-sports athletes," as they're called here without irony. It's also a hub for gaming addiction -- a place where deaths are attributed to games and the government funds treatment centers. MarineKing knows those facts all too well. He's been caught in a lifelong struggle between the dark and the light sides of gaming." In other words, insinuating that MKP has been struggling with gaming addiction (struggling with the dark side,) when really, the story is him falsely being considered a gaming addict. While the definition of addiction is its own debate, we will use the author's own words to clear the issue, as he ends with the expert concluding that pro-gamers (ie MKP) are not addicts. B. the dismissive attitude of games as fiction: "He drifted further into the game and, as his parents came to see it, out of the physical world. It was all fiction, of course, but it seemed real to him. And soon MarineKing started to like this fantasy world better than the real one. One night, in his journal, he scribbled a secret: "I want to grow up to be a pro gamer."" Considering pro-gaming an "escape" into fantasy over reality is a stereotypical view of gaming, but a false interpretation of pro-gaming; in fact, pro-gaming would be the merging of the two, connecting that "fiction" to the real world. C. Constant descriptions of MKP in terms of an addict. "Then he quickly moved on to another round of "StarCraft" -- not because of the competition, really. He just wanted -- or needed -- to keep playing." Again, huge authorial liberties in assuming that MKP didn't play Starcraft at WCG because of the competition (...really? does this guy even know anyone who plays SC?), and the not too subtle addendum of "need" instead of "want" as the drive behind his play. D. The description of Darkforce. Self-explanatory. E. The description of MKP's go-spamming, clear framing in terms of the jittery/trembling junkie (when really, all he's doing is pressing three keys over and over, which really takes no effort at all). While it would be fine to mention it as part of the picture being drawn, the author mentions it multiple times, clearly emphasizing this supposedly erratic nature of MKP. As an interesting side note, Olympic athletes also hate long waits and are itching to get into competition, I recall specifically in one of the women's finals where a start sound malfunction elicited a false start [that the swimmer was not DQ'd for since it was a malfunction], in which the commentator explicitly stated that they hated the wait and just wanted to get in, since the wait would disrupt them as they were ready at that very moment. That said, I do think a lot of the vitriol directed towards this article comes not just from the article, but the narrative itself and the attitude displayed by MKP's parents. Having just watched Dead Poet Society for the first time a week ago, it certainly is an infuriating thing to picture when it comes to obstructing young dreams, especially when those dreams are particular to this game that we all enjoy. | ||
yeint
Estonia2329 Posts
On August 06 2012 19:29 Rabiator wrote: Show nested quote + On August 06 2012 19:06 Fencar wrote: There is no transition from progamer to any other job ... and this makes any concern about potentially wasting the most important time of your life on something trivial (because you dont produce anything while playing computer games) instead of learning skills which will sustain you for the rest of your life. No progamer will make enough money to be able to sustain himself for 40-50 more years and for that time you need a plan! Coaching, off the top of my head. You see pro gamers transition to coaching for various games a lot in my memory.Coaching and casting jobs are available IN A VERY VERY VERY LIMITED NUMBER. Thus you can NOT get a coaching/casting job for all progamers when their careers are over. Coaches and casters also keep their jobs for more years than a progamer is fit enough to be a progamer. You also need additional knowledge / talents as a coach / caster which only very few progamers will have. Its not the same for regular sports or any form of education. What the hell? Did you really say there isn't a VERY VERY VERY limited number of coaching and casting positions in regular sports? | ||
Rabiator
Germany3948 Posts
On August 06 2012 19:22 Rioo wrote: Show nested quote + I have an easy question, which one would you choose? Your son/daughter practices a sport 10 hours per day. Your son/daughter studies on his/her classes 10 hours per day. Your son/daughter plays videogames 10 hours per day. Although the first 2 options are not that pleasant either, most of the people will pick 1st or 2nd option, only some video game addicts will go for 3rd. Wouldn't really want to my kid to do any of those things for 10 hours/day. Like all things you have to take it in moderation. The thing with being a pro playing StarCraft is that you combine work with fun which makes it kinda okay if it really makes you as much money as a normal job would do. I've seen some posts about pro players not having fun while playing the game, but just listen to Real Talk with Naniwa and you'll understand that it's not true. If you're not making money (not being pro at a high enough level) then yes, it's probably not a good idea to play for 10 hours/day. The paradox is, of course, to become pro enough 99% of players need to put those hours into the game. So if Naniwa says that he plays for fun it is going to be true all the time he plays and practices and is going to be true for all progamers? I highly doubt that. I would say that it is a requirement for 100% of progamers to practice regularly and those 10 hours are just an arbitrary number. That time includes watching other players and studying their new tactics and thinking about it, so the 10 hours arent that bad in the end. The bad part is that such exclusivity of thought really limits your "mental growth" in other areas since its not possible to do both studying and playing Starcraft professionally. Those who do it are only somewhat successful in Starcraft and we dont really know how much their studies suffer from doing that "halfheartedly". | ||
Rabiator
Germany3948 Posts
On August 06 2012 19:37 yeint wrote: Show nested quote + On August 06 2012 19:29 Rabiator wrote: On August 06 2012 19:06 Fencar wrote: There is no transition from progamer to any other job ... and this makes any concern about potentially wasting the most important time of your life on something trivial (because you dont produce anything while playing computer games) instead of learning skills which will sustain you for the rest of your life. No progamer will make enough money to be able to sustain himself for 40-50 more years and for that time you need a plan! Coaching, off the top of my head. You see pro gamers transition to coaching for various games a lot in my memory.Coaching and casting jobs are available IN A VERY VERY VERY LIMITED NUMBER. Thus you can NOT get a coaching/casting job for all progamers when their careers are over. Coaches and casters also keep their jobs for more years than a progamer is fit enough to be a progamer. You also need additional knowledge / talents as a coach / caster which only very few progamers will have. Its not the same for regular sports or any form of education. What the hell? Did you really say there isn't a VERY VERY VERY limited number of coaching and casting positions in regular sports? No I didnt ... those jobs are limited for ESPORTS ... since there arent any local teams, national championships and school training groups which need Starcraft coaches. | ||
yeint
Estonia2329 Posts
On August 06 2012 19:40 Rabiator wrote: Show nested quote + On August 06 2012 19:37 yeint wrote: On August 06 2012 19:29 Rabiator wrote: On August 06 2012 19:06 Fencar wrote: There is no transition from progamer to any other job ... and this makes any concern about potentially wasting the most important time of your life on something trivial (because you dont produce anything while playing computer games) instead of learning skills which will sustain you for the rest of your life. No progamer will make enough money to be able to sustain himself for 40-50 more years and for that time you need a plan! Coaching, off the top of my head. You see pro gamers transition to coaching for various games a lot in my memory.Coaching and casting jobs are available IN A VERY VERY VERY LIMITED NUMBER. Thus you can NOT get a coaching/casting job for all progamers when their careers are over. Coaches and casters also keep their jobs for more years than a progamer is fit enough to be a progamer. You also need additional knowledge / talents as a coach / caster which only very few progamers will have. Its not the same for regular sports or any form of education. What the hell? Did you really say there isn't a VERY VERY VERY limited number of coaching and casting positions in regular sports? No I didnt ... those jobs are limited for ESPORTS ... since there arent any local teams, national championships and school training groups which need Starcraft coaches. And there are far fewer people who even attempt to go pro. Logically, there are just as many coaching/casting positions in SC2 as there are in, say, soccer. Relatively speaking, because the amount of soccer players is astronomically higher. | ||
LlamaNamedOsama
United States1900 Posts
On August 06 2012 18:55 Rabiator wrote: Show nested quote + On August 06 2012 17:47 FrosTByTe11 wrote: I think for those saying that video games have nothing to contribute to life is quite false because like anything you do in life, you get something out of it. For example, in Day9's #100 daily, he talked a lot about the things he learned in life relative to his career playing Starcraft. If there is anything that separates a gaming addict and a competitive sports player, I think that video pretty much explain a lot about the differences between the two. There is no transition from progamer to any other job ... Skills learned as a progamer will not help you in any other job ... contrary to regular sports or studying ... and I hope people will stop these useless comparisons. ...There is also no transition from professional athlete to any other job. You might say: "coach! commentator! they've earned enough to not need another job!" - but the exact same could apply to gaming, just on a smaller scale because it simply has a smaller scene. That said, what about the smaller sports, that don't get as much attention? Should those athletes also just give up and go? Now, I'm not saying "yeah everyone, go and drop out of school and try to become pros." The bottom line is that the great majority of these people, esports or regular sports, are doing something they love, doing it because they love to compete, and doing it because there also happens to be some incentives on the side. And that is the similarity that distinguishes between addiction and genuine positive pursuit, not the amount of money that you get paid. | ||
KaRath_
Australia245 Posts
| ||
Nuithari
Belgium737 Posts
On August 06 2012 19:32 LlamaNamedOsama wrote: + Show Spoiler + On August 06 2012 08:44 FairForever wrote: Show nested quote + On August 06 2012 08:11 Bippzy wrote: I think the article has much to go in storyline. Saying marineking won in 8 minutes should not be "he won in just 8 minutes" it should be more like "he executed a well disguised rush and caught his opponent off guard. Also, go seemed like an indicative sign of addiction, but its actually BFD in the gamig community. Plus " he plays not because he wants to, but has to." seems a little too over the top. Is marinekings past weighing on him at wcg? Probably not as much as this article makes it out to be: This article is disliked in my mind because it makes a "philosophical" question about gaming and then discusses it using MKP and statistics and government actions..it all paints the wrong picture What are you talking about? Rush? People who don't play video games don't know what a rush is. Nor do they understand how you disguise something. I thought the article was extremely well-written - it brought both sides of the argument, the good and bad of gaming. I think people here focus way too much on the addiction side, which is actually, sadly, an issue (because some people are addicted to gaming - this is not necessarily good). Yes there are other non-gaming examples of bad addictions (eg. athletics) but that's not the point of this article. The article was not well-written. There are countless problems with it, and not simply because it "disses" esports. 1: It demonstrates poor knowledge of its subject content. The description of Terran as humanlike aliens instead of humans (for goodness sake, even the Wikipedia entry for SC races points out that the Terrans are humans exiled for earth. The description of Protoss probes as termites (when the bug-reference confuses Protoss for Zerg; again, see basic wikipedia entry where even the most uninformed can understand that Zerg is the insectoid race, not Protoss). We don't expect these people to give fully informed LR of each game, but at least understand the basic structure of it... 2: Problems with narrative construction. There's no clear timeline or context. The author jumps from 15 year old MKP to contemporary MKP within the same paragraph. I can see what the author is trying to do, going with the redemption story, but too much of the article frames MKP as traversing both ends of the spectrum, but that is a wholly incorrect narrative. MKP really represents only the positive side of the story, not the negative, and the author therefore has to manipulate and twist his narrative to fit his ends, which in this case, means that he distorts the narrative to portray MKP as an addict, which leads to issue #3. Furthermore, the positive aspects of his subject are poorly represented. The article very quickly throws in the mention of fans twice very briefly (once with the fan offering a gift, the other MKP's tweet). No mention is made of the culture which inspired MKP to pursue pro-gaming, or the fanbase which is part of the addendum. This is an important fact to recognize because the distinction between addiction and legitimacy is often drawn in the lens of "anti-social" or social tendencies, and clearly, the interactive nature of esports as a cultural occurrence is reflective of the positive, and not the negative. 3: The author excessively and repeatedly goes overboard with his insertion of personal interpretation, instead of objective fact. Of course, this is worsened by a clear bias one side,negatively portraying esports. Whether intentional or not, as it may simply be a social attitude subconsciously engrained, it still is poor journalistic quality. This one is the most blatant problem with the article, and the examples are numerous. A. the narrative distortion of #2 is clearly the author's intent when his general view is stated near the beginning of the article with these lines: "It's a place that's home to the world's finest "e-sports athletes," as they're called here without irony. It's also a hub for gaming addiction -- a place where deaths are attributed to games and the government funds treatment centers. MarineKing knows those facts all too well. He's been caught in a lifelong struggle between the dark and the light sides of gaming." In other words, insinuating that MKP has been struggling with gaming addiction (struggling with the dark side,) when really, the story is him falsely being considered a gaming addict. While the definition of addiction is its own debate, we will use the author's own words to clear the issue, as he ends with the expert concluding that pro-gamers (ie MKP) are not addicts. B. the dismissive attitude of games as fiction: "He drifted further into the game and, as his parents came to see it, out of the physical world. It was all fiction, of course, but it seemed real to him. And soon MarineKing started to like this fantasy world better than the real one. One night, in his journal, he scribbled a secret: "I want to grow up to be a pro gamer."" Considering pro-gaming an "escape" into fantasy over reality is a stereotypical view of gaming, but a false interpretation of pro-gaming; in fact, pro-gaming would be the merging of the two, connecting that "fiction" to the real world. C. Constant descriptions of MKP in terms of an addict. "Then he quickly moved on to another round of "StarCraft" -- not because of the competition, really. He just wanted -- or needed -- to keep playing." Again, huge authorial liberties in assuming that MKP didn't play Starcraft at WCG because of the competition (...really? does this guy even know anyone who plays SC?), and the not too subtle addendum of "need" instead of "want" as the drive behind his play. D. The description of Darkforce. Self-explanatory. E. The description of MKP's go-spamming, clear framing in terms of the jittery/trembling junkie (when really, all he's doing is pressing three keys over and over, which really takes no effort at all). While it would be fine to mention it as part of the picture being drawn, the author mentions it multiple times, clearly emphasizing this supposedly erratic nature of MKP. As an interesting side note, Olympic athletes also hate long waits and are itching to get into competition, I recall specifically in one of the women's finals where a start sound malfunction elicited a false start [that the swimmer was not DQ'd for since it was a malfunction], in which the commentator explicitly stated that they hated the wait and just wanted to get in, since the wait would disrupt them as they were ready at that very moment. That said, I do think a lot of the vitriol directed towards this article comes not just from the article, but the narrative itself and the attitude displayed by MKP's parents. Having just watched Dead Poet Society for the first time a week ago, it certainly is an infuriating thing to picture when it comes to obstructing young dreams, especially when those dreams are particular to this game that we all enjoy. This... The story is nice, very nice. It shows a lot of MKP. But I hate the whole "tone" of the article. The personal interjections of the author are irritating, as it tries to project a false image to the reader loosely backed up by misinterpreted facts. I like the article, but not how it's written. Actually I should say I like the story, but not the article. | ||
Xiphos
Canada7507 Posts
On August 06 2012 19:42 LlamaNamedOsama wrote: Show nested quote + On August 06 2012 18:55 Rabiator wrote: On August 06 2012 17:47 FrosTByTe11 wrote: I think for those saying that video games have nothing to contribute to life is quite false because like anything you do in life, you get something out of it. For example, in Day9's #100 daily, he talked a lot about the things he learned in life relative to his career playing Starcraft. If there is anything that separates a gaming addict and a competitive sports player, I think that video pretty much explain a lot about the differences between the two. There is no transition from progamer to any other job ... Skills learned as a progamer will not help you in any other job ... contrary to regular sports or studying ... and I hope people will stop these useless comparisons. ...There is also no transition from professional athlete to any other job. You might say: "coach! commentator! they've earned enough to not need another job!" - but the exact same could apply to gaming, just on a smaller scale because it simply has a smaller scene. That said, what about the smaller sports, that don't get as much attention? Should those athletes also just give up and go? Now, I'm not saying "yeah everyone, go and drop out of school and try to become pros." The bottom line is that the great majority of these people, esports or regular sports, are doing something they love, doing it because they love to compete, and doing it because there also happens to be some incentives on the side. And that is the similarity that distinguishes between addiction and genuine positive pursuit, not the amount of money that you get paid. But except that NBA, NFL, NHL players gets paid a shittone, they can transition into coaching positions afterward or become one of the executives at that particular franchise they played for at a pretty smooth pace. With 1 single year of paycheck, nearly all of them are able to purchase a shop or store of their own to receive more income. But professional gaming don't exactly offer such luxury unless you make it to the top 1%. It is a such volatile atmosphere because you are uncertain about your future of yourself, your team, and most importantly the state of your game. | ||
yeint
Estonia2329 Posts
You don't have to go into SC2 casting from SC2 playing. You can go into a number of gaming related fields. Want a career in marketing gaming peripherals? By being on pro gaming teams you've certainly built a network of contacts in the field. Sure, it's not a guarantee of employment, you need actual skills and talents and a bit of luck, but that's equally true of most university degrees. Probably the only thing you can do from 18-21 that guarantees employment is going to a trade school and learning plumbing or something. | ||
LlamaNamedOsama
United States1900 Posts
On August 06 2012 19:48 Xiphos wrote: Show nested quote + On August 06 2012 19:42 LlamaNamedOsama wrote: On August 06 2012 18:55 Rabiator wrote: On August 06 2012 17:47 FrosTByTe11 wrote: I think for those saying that video games have nothing to contribute to life is quite false because like anything you do in life, you get something out of it. For example, in Day9's #100 daily, he talked a lot about the things he learned in life relative to his career playing Starcraft. If there is anything that separates a gaming addict and a competitive sports player, I think that video pretty much explain a lot about the differences between the two. There is no transition from progamer to any other job ... Skills learned as a progamer will not help you in any other job ... contrary to regular sports or studying ... and I hope people will stop these useless comparisons. ...There is also no transition from professional athlete to any other job. You might say: "coach! commentator! they've earned enough to not need another job!" - but the exact same could apply to gaming, just on a smaller scale because it simply has a smaller scene. That said, what about the smaller sports, that don't get as much attention? Should those athletes also just give up and go? Now, I'm not saying "yeah everyone, go and drop out of school and try to become pros." The bottom line is that the great majority of these people, esports or regular sports, are doing something they love, doing it because they love to compete, and doing it because there also happens to be some incentives on the side. And that is the similarity that distinguishes between addiction and genuine positive pursuit, not the amount of money that you get paid. But except that NBA, NFL, NHL players gets paid a shittone, they can transition into coaching positions afterward or become one of the executives at that particular franchise they played for at a pretty smooth pace. With 1 single year of paycheck, nearly all of them are able to purchase a shop or store of their own to receive more income. But professional gaming don't exactly offer such luxury unless you make it to the top 1%. It is a such volatile atmosphere because you are uncertain about your future of yourself, your team, and most importantly the state of your game. I agree, and that adds to my point, as ultimately, e-sports are real sports competitors are not/should not be in it solely for $ since probability of success is such a fickle thing, and not the main thing that drives most of them in the first place. | ||
Rabiator
Germany3948 Posts
On August 06 2012 19:41 yeint wrote: Show nested quote + On August 06 2012 19:40 Rabiator wrote: On August 06 2012 19:37 yeint wrote: On August 06 2012 19:29 Rabiator wrote: On August 06 2012 19:06 Fencar wrote: There is no transition from progamer to any other job ... and this makes any concern about potentially wasting the most important time of your life on something trivial (because you dont produce anything while playing computer games) instead of learning skills which will sustain you for the rest of your life. No progamer will make enough money to be able to sustain himself for 40-50 more years and for that time you need a plan! Coaching, off the top of my head. You see pro gamers transition to coaching for various games a lot in my memory.Coaching and casting jobs are available IN A VERY VERY VERY LIMITED NUMBER. Thus you can NOT get a coaching/casting job for all progamers when their careers are over. Coaches and casters also keep their jobs for more years than a progamer is fit enough to be a progamer. You also need additional knowledge / talents as a coach / caster which only very few progamers will have. Its not the same for regular sports or any form of education. What the hell? Did you really say there isn't a VERY VERY VERY limited number of coaching and casting positions in regular sports? No I didnt ... those jobs are limited for ESPORTS ... since there arent any local teams, national championships and school training groups which need Starcraft coaches. And there are far fewer people who even attempt to go pro. Logically, there are just as many coaching/casting positions in SC2 as there are in, say, soccer. Relatively speaking, because the amount of soccer players is astronomically higher. On August 06 2012 19:42 LlamaNamedOsama wrote: Show nested quote + On August 06 2012 18:55 Rabiator wrote: On August 06 2012 17:47 FrosTByTe11 wrote: I think for those saying that video games have nothing to contribute to life is quite false because like anything you do in life, you get something out of it. For example, in Day9's #100 daily, he talked a lot about the things he learned in life relative to his career playing Starcraft. If there is anything that separates a gaming addict and a competitive sports player, I think that video pretty much explain a lot about the differences between the two. There is no transition from progamer to any other job ... Skills learned as a progamer will not help you in any other job ... contrary to regular sports or studying ... and I hope people will stop these useless comparisons. ...There is also no transition from professional athlete to any other job. You might say: "coach! commentator! they've earned enough to not need another job!" - but the exact same could apply to gaming, just on a smaller scale because it simply has a smaller scene. That said, what about the smaller sports, that don't get as much attention? Should those athletes also just give up and go? Now, I'm not saying "yeah everyone, go and drop out of school and try to become pros." The bottom line is that the great majority of these people, esports or regular sports, are doing something they love, doing it because they love to compete, and doing it because there also happens to be some incentives on the side. And that is the similarity that distinguishes between addiction and genuine positive pursuit, not the amount of money that you get paid. No ... as a football player you can also "transition into" school teacher (for sports) which one friend of mine did. The general fitness of playing any "real sport" will also benefit you in physical jobs which have nothing to do with the sport itself or teaching it to others. For computer games that is not the case, since progamer =/= programmer and you dont have any special knowledge useful for anything else needed in life. The main problem isnt really the pros, because they are few in number, but rather the thousands of kids who waste their time dreaming about it and playing too much with their computer while they should actually be going out, meet other people and have fun in real life. They arent told that becoming an eSport pro has some severe downsides, because it doesnt help you with the 40-50 years after your progamer life (if you manage to pull that off). | ||
Detwiler
United States239 Posts
| ||
Dosey
United States4505 Posts
On August 06 2012 19:14 Hyperionnn wrote: Show nested quote + On August 06 2012 18:42 Kyrillion wrote: I have an easy question, which one would you choose? Your son/daughter practices a sport 10 hours per day. Your son/daughter studies on his/her classes 10 hours per day. Your son/daughter plays videogames 10 hours per day. Although the first 2 options are not that pleasant either, most of the people will pick 1st or 2nd option, only some video game addicts will go for 3rd. Not a very hard question indeed. In the first option, it all depends on the sport but the second one is clearly the worst. Unless we're talking about University, it's fairly astonishing and sad that one could study for 10 hours a day. Thank god Nony wasn't playing MKP. The reporters head would fucking explode trying to find a way to insult that handsome man. Makes you wonder why they chose to show the beauteous Tasteless while introducing him as an ex-progamer. Which debatable, but that's what the viewer will think anyway. It is even more sad one could play some game for 10 hours a day, I guess you are playing around 10 hours as well Is it any worse than sitting in an office for 10 hours a day? At least video games are challenging... | ||
Rabiator
Germany3948 Posts
On August 06 2012 20:09 Detwiler wrote: Are they addicted? Yes they are. But not anymore than football players are addicted to football. Or baseball players to baseball. Look to reach those heights in any skill you have to have an addiction. Its not normal behavior to sit down for 8+ hours and practice the same thing over and over. But hey if it an Olympic diver you call it dedication. If its a starcraft player you call it addiction. In reality both are the same thing only difference is society approves of the diver. No, they are not the same thing, because playing a computer game does NOTHING for your future life and is just something "for the moment". Sports will always give you fitness which is good to have as a human being and will at least give you a fringe training for other jobs. Do you think "playing computer games" will look good on any job application? Nope. Having trained as a professional athlete will give you fitness enough to become a firefighter, policeman, ranger, ... name one job where "playing Starcraft 2" will at least give you a fringe benefit and which is needed en masse like cops, firefighters and so on. On August 06 2012 20:14 Dosey wrote: Show nested quote + On August 06 2012 19:14 Hyperionnn wrote: On August 06 2012 18:42 Kyrillion wrote: I have an easy question, which one would you choose? Your son/daughter practices a sport 10 hours per day. Your son/daughter studies on his/her classes 10 hours per day. Your son/daughter plays videogames 10 hours per day. Although the first 2 options are not that pleasant either, most of the people will pick 1st or 2nd option, only some video game addicts will go for 3rd. Not a very hard question indeed. In the first option, it all depends on the sport but the second one is clearly the worst. Unless we're talking about University, it's fairly astonishing and sad that one could study for 10 hours a day. Thank god Nony wasn't playing MKP. The reporters head would fucking explode trying to find a way to insult that handsome man. Makes you wonder why they chose to show the beauteous Tasteless while introducing him as an ex-progamer. Which debatable, but that's what the viewer will think anyway. It is even more sad one could play some game for 10 hours a day, I guess you are playing around 10 hours as well Is it any worse than sitting in an office for 10 hours a day? At least video games are challenging... They also dont mean anything while the decisions you make in your office all those 10 hours a day can make the difference between an oilspill in the gulf of mexico or a building your company constructed withstanding a tornado and saving lives. Please kids .... stop kidding yourselves. | ||
Detwiler
United States239 Posts
On August 06 2012 20:18 Rabiator wrote: Show nested quote + On August 06 2012 20:09 Detwiler wrote: Are they addicted? Yes they are. But not anymore than football players are addicted to football. Or baseball players to baseball. Look to reach those heights in any skill you have to have an addiction. Its not normal behavior to sit down for 8+ hours and practice the same thing over and over. But hey if it an Olympic diver you call it dedication. If its a starcraft player you call it addiction. In reality both are the same thing only difference is society approves of the diver. No, they are not the same thing, because playing a computer game does NOTHING for your future life and is just something "for the moment". Sports will always give you fitness which is good to have as a human being and will at least give you a fringe training for other jobs. Do you think "playing computer games" will look good on any job application? Nope. Having trained as a professional athlete will give you fitness enough to become a firefighter, policeman, ranger, ... name one job where "playing Starcraft 2" will at least give you a fringe benefit and which is needed en masse like cops, firefighters and so on. Show nested quote + On August 06 2012 20:14 Dosey wrote: On August 06 2012 19:14 Hyperionnn wrote: On August 06 2012 18:42 Kyrillion wrote: I have an easy question, which one would you choose? Your son/daughter practices a sport 10 hours per day. Your son/daughter studies on his/her classes 10 hours per day. Your son/daughter plays videogames 10 hours per day. Although the first 2 options are not that pleasant either, most of the people will pick 1st or 2nd option, only some video game addicts will go for 3rd. Not a very hard question indeed. In the first option, it all depends on the sport but the second one is clearly the worst. Unless we're talking about University, it's fairly astonishing and sad that one could study for 10 hours a day. Thank god Nony wasn't playing MKP. The reporters head would fucking explode trying to find a way to insult that handsome man. Makes you wonder why they chose to show the beauteous Tasteless while introducing him as an ex-progamer. Which debatable, but that's what the viewer will think anyway. It is even more sad one could play some game for 10 hours a day, I guess you are playing around 10 hours as well Is it any worse than sitting in an office for 10 hours a day? At least video games are challenging... They also dont mean anything while the decisions you make in your office all those 10 hours a day can make the difference between an oilspill in the gulf of mexico or a building your company constructed withstanding a tornado and saving lives. Please kids .... stop kidding yourselves. What does the effect it has on their future have anything to do with weather or not its an addiction the same as any other sports player? Oh wait it doesnt. | ||
Rabiator
Germany3948 Posts
On August 06 2012 20:24 Detwiler wrote: Show nested quote + On August 06 2012 20:18 Rabiator wrote: On August 06 2012 20:09 Detwiler wrote: Are they addicted? Yes they are. But not anymore than football players are addicted to football. Or baseball players to baseball. Look to reach those heights in any skill you have to have an addiction. Its not normal behavior to sit down for 8+ hours and practice the same thing over and over. But hey if it an Olympic diver you call it dedication. If its a starcraft player you call it addiction. In reality both are the same thing only difference is society approves of the diver. No, they are not the same thing, because playing a computer game does NOTHING for your future life and is just something "for the moment". Sports will always give you fitness which is good to have as a human being and will at least give you a fringe training for other jobs. Do you think "playing computer games" will look good on any job application? Nope. Having trained as a professional athlete will give you fitness enough to become a firefighter, policeman, ranger, ... name one job where "playing Starcraft 2" will at least give you a fringe benefit and which is needed en masse like cops, firefighters and so on. On August 06 2012 20:14 Dosey wrote: On August 06 2012 19:14 Hyperionnn wrote: On August 06 2012 18:42 Kyrillion wrote: I have an easy question, which one would you choose? Your son/daughter practices a sport 10 hours per day. Your son/daughter studies on his/her classes 10 hours per day. Your son/daughter plays videogames 10 hours per day. Although the first 2 options are not that pleasant either, most of the people will pick 1st or 2nd option, only some video game addicts will go for 3rd. Not a very hard question indeed. In the first option, it all depends on the sport but the second one is clearly the worst. Unless we're talking about University, it's fairly astonishing and sad that one could study for 10 hours a day. Thank god Nony wasn't playing MKP. The reporters head would fucking explode trying to find a way to insult that handsome man. Makes you wonder why they chose to show the beauteous Tasteless while introducing him as an ex-progamer. Which debatable, but that's what the viewer will think anyway. It is even more sad one could play some game for 10 hours a day, I guess you are playing around 10 hours as well Is it any worse than sitting in an office for 10 hours a day? At least video games are challenging... They also dont mean anything while the decisions you make in your office all those 10 hours a day can make the difference between an oilspill in the gulf of mexico or a building your company constructed withstanding a tornado and saving lives. Please kids .... stop kidding yourselves. What does the effect it has on their future have anything to do with weather or not its an addiction the same as any other sports player? Oh wait it doesnt. Its the same for any addiction ... it doesnt affect your future life except to make you unprepared to meet it. Real sports helps you and thus it isnt an addiction, but eSports doesnt give you any benefit which integrates with anything else and thus it is terrible and an addiction. | ||
Dosey
United States4505 Posts
On August 06 2012 20:18 Rabiator wrote: Show nested quote + On August 06 2012 20:09 Detwiler wrote: Are they addicted? Yes they are. But not anymore than football players are addicted to football. Or baseball players to baseball. Look to reach those heights in any skill you have to have an addiction. Its not normal behavior to sit down for 8+ hours and practice the same thing over and over. But hey if it an Olympic diver you call it dedication. If its a starcraft player you call it addiction. In reality both are the same thing only difference is society approves of the diver. No, they are not the same thing, because playing a computer game does NOTHING for your future life and is just something "for the moment". Sports will always give you fitness which is good to have as a human being and will at least give you a fringe training for other jobs. Do you think "playing computer games" will look good on any job application? Nope. Having trained as a professional athlete will give you fitness enough to become a firefighter, policeman, ranger, ... name one job where "playing Starcraft 2" will at least give you a fringe benefit and which is needed en masse like cops, firefighters and so on. Show nested quote + On August 06 2012 20:14 Dosey wrote: On August 06 2012 19:14 Hyperionnn wrote: On August 06 2012 18:42 Kyrillion wrote: I have an easy question, which one would you choose? Your son/daughter practices a sport 10 hours per day. Your son/daughter studies on his/her classes 10 hours per day. Your son/daughter plays videogames 10 hours per day. Although the first 2 options are not that pleasant either, most of the people will pick 1st or 2nd option, only some video game addicts will go for 3rd. Not a very hard question indeed. In the first option, it all depends on the sport but the second one is clearly the worst. Unless we're talking about University, it's fairly astonishing and sad that one could study for 10 hours a day. Thank god Nony wasn't playing MKP. The reporters head would fucking explode trying to find a way to insult that handsome man. Makes you wonder why they chose to show the beauteous Tasteless while introducing him as an ex-progamer. Which debatable, but that's what the viewer will think anyway. It is even more sad one could play some game for 10 hours a day, I guess you are playing around 10 hours as well Is it any worse than sitting in an office for 10 hours a day? At least video games are challenging... They also dont mean anything while the decisions you make in your office all those 10 hours a day can make the difference between an oilspill in the gulf of mexico or a building your company constructed withstanding a tornado and saving lives. Please kids .... stop kidding yourselves. Sorry, my office doesn't save the world. And I work 12 hours a day, most of it spent (guess where?) on my ass. By your argument though, sports are just as insignificant as video games because they don't do shit for the world either. | ||
Detwiler
United States239 Posts
On August 06 2012 20:27 Rabiator wrote: Show nested quote + On August 06 2012 20:24 Detwiler wrote: On August 06 2012 20:18 Rabiator wrote: On August 06 2012 20:09 Detwiler wrote: Are they addicted? Yes they are. But not anymore than football players are addicted to football. Or baseball players to baseball. Look to reach those heights in any skill you have to have an addiction. Its not normal behavior to sit down for 8+ hours and practice the same thing over and over. But hey if it an Olympic diver you call it dedication. If its a starcraft player you call it addiction. In reality both are the same thing only difference is society approves of the diver. No, they are not the same thing, because playing a computer game does NOTHING for your future life and is just something "for the moment". Sports will always give you fitness which is good to have as a human being and will at least give you a fringe training for other jobs. Do you think "playing computer games" will look good on any job application? Nope. Having trained as a professional athlete will give you fitness enough to become a firefighter, policeman, ranger, ... name one job where "playing Starcraft 2" will at least give you a fringe benefit and which is needed en masse like cops, firefighters and so on. On August 06 2012 20:14 Dosey wrote: On August 06 2012 19:14 Hyperionnn wrote: On August 06 2012 18:42 Kyrillion wrote: I have an easy question, which one would you choose? Your son/daughter practices a sport 10 hours per day. Your son/daughter studies on his/her classes 10 hours per day. Your son/daughter plays videogames 10 hours per day. Although the first 2 options are not that pleasant either, most of the people will pick 1st or 2nd option, only some video game addicts will go for 3rd. Not a very hard question indeed. In the first option, it all depends on the sport but the second one is clearly the worst. Unless we're talking about University, it's fairly astonishing and sad that one could study for 10 hours a day. Thank god Nony wasn't playing MKP. The reporters head would fucking explode trying to find a way to insult that handsome man. Makes you wonder why they chose to show the beauteous Tasteless while introducing him as an ex-progamer. Which debatable, but that's what the viewer will think anyway. It is even more sad one could play some game for 10 hours a day, I guess you are playing around 10 hours as well Is it any worse than sitting in an office for 10 hours a day? At least video games are challenging... They also dont mean anything while the decisions you make in your office all those 10 hours a day can make the difference between an oilspill in the gulf of mexico or a building your company constructed withstanding a tornado and saving lives. Please kids .... stop kidding yourselves. What does the effect it has on their future have anything to do with weather or not its an addiction the same as any other sports player? Oh wait it doesnt. Its the same for any addiction ... it doesnt affect your future life except to make you unprepared to meet it. Real sports helps you and thus it isnt an addiction, but eSports doesnt give you any benefit which integrates with anything else and thus it is terrible and an addiction. For every one player that makes it in pro sports then retires and becomes a commentator there are 1000s that fail or end up addicted to pain killers with a broken body that no one remembers. Now if you are talking about people who want to drop out of highschool and do esports full time. Thats obviously an idiot decision but not any worse than a person dropping out of high school to join the nba. What happens when he gets injured in his 1st season and is dropped from the team? There noway he can get into college because the only way he would have got there in the 1st place is a basketball scholarship because his grades were shit from spending all his time practicing. It happens all the time. But like i said previously society approves of the basketball player he was just following his dream and like you said gaming is a "terrible addiction". On a side note if gaming is such a terrible addiction why do you have over 2k posts on TL seems kinda odd to me lol. | ||
Dosey
United States4505 Posts
On August 06 2012 20:27 Rabiator wrote: Show nested quote + On August 06 2012 20:24 Detwiler wrote: On August 06 2012 20:18 Rabiator wrote: On August 06 2012 20:09 Detwiler wrote: Are they addicted? Yes they are. But not anymore than football players are addicted to football. Or baseball players to baseball. Look to reach those heights in any skill you have to have an addiction. Its not normal behavior to sit down for 8+ hours and practice the same thing over and over. But hey if it an Olympic diver you call it dedication. If its a starcraft player you call it addiction. In reality both are the same thing only difference is society approves of the diver. No, they are not the same thing, because playing a computer game does NOTHING for your future life and is just something "for the moment". Sports will always give you fitness which is good to have as a human being and will at least give you a fringe training for other jobs. Do you think "playing computer games" will look good on any job application? Nope. Having trained as a professional athlete will give you fitness enough to become a firefighter, policeman, ranger, ... name one job where "playing Starcraft 2" will at least give you a fringe benefit and which is needed en masse like cops, firefighters and so on. On August 06 2012 20:14 Dosey wrote: On August 06 2012 19:14 Hyperionnn wrote: On August 06 2012 18:42 Kyrillion wrote: I have an easy question, which one would you choose? Your son/daughter practices a sport 10 hours per day. Your son/daughter studies on his/her classes 10 hours per day. Your son/daughter plays videogames 10 hours per day. Although the first 2 options are not that pleasant either, most of the people will pick 1st or 2nd option, only some video game addicts will go for 3rd. Not a very hard question indeed. In the first option, it all depends on the sport but the second one is clearly the worst. Unless we're talking about University, it's fairly astonishing and sad that one could study for 10 hours a day. Thank god Nony wasn't playing MKP. The reporters head would fucking explode trying to find a way to insult that handsome man. Makes you wonder why they chose to show the beauteous Tasteless while introducing him as an ex-progamer. Which debatable, but that's what the viewer will think anyway. It is even more sad one could play some game for 10 hours a day, I guess you are playing around 10 hours as well Is it any worse than sitting in an office for 10 hours a day? At least video games are challenging... They also dont mean anything while the decisions you make in your office all those 10 hours a day can make the difference between an oilspill in the gulf of mexico or a building your company constructed withstanding a tornado and saving lives. Please kids .... stop kidding yourselves. What does the effect it has on their future have anything to do with weather or not its an addiction the same as any other sports player? Oh wait it doesnt. Its the same for any addiction ... it doesnt affect your future life except to make you unprepared to meet it. Real sports helps you and thus it isnt an addiction, but eSports doesnt give you any benefit which integrates with anything else and thus it is terrible and an addiction. Video games can't help you develop skills for the future? Deductive reasoning, cognitive thinking, speed, accuracy, vision, multitasking abilities, market shifts, math, probabilities, etc.. You telling me that those skills are meaningless? | ||
Sawamura
Malaysia7602 Posts
On August 06 2012 20:54 Dosey wrote: Show nested quote + On August 06 2012 20:27 Rabiator wrote: On August 06 2012 20:24 Detwiler wrote: On August 06 2012 20:18 Rabiator wrote: On August 06 2012 20:09 Detwiler wrote: Are they addicted? Yes they are. But not anymore than football players are addicted to football. Or baseball players to baseball. Look to reach those heights in any skill you have to have an addiction. Its not normal behavior to sit down for 8+ hours and practice the same thing over and over. But hey if it an Olympic diver you call it dedication. If its a starcraft player you call it addiction. In reality both are the same thing only difference is society approves of the diver. No, they are not the same thing, because playing a computer game does NOTHING for your future life and is just something "for the moment". Sports will always give you fitness which is good to have as a human being and will at least give you a fringe training for other jobs. Do you think "playing computer games" will look good on any job application? Nope. Having trained as a professional athlete will give you fitness enough to become a firefighter, policeman, ranger, ... name one job where "playing Starcraft 2" will at least give you a fringe benefit and which is needed en masse like cops, firefighters and so on. On August 06 2012 20:14 Dosey wrote: On August 06 2012 19:14 Hyperionnn wrote: On August 06 2012 18:42 Kyrillion wrote: I have an easy question, which one would you choose? Your son/daughter practices a sport 10 hours per day. Your son/daughter studies on his/her classes 10 hours per day. Your son/daughter plays videogames 10 hours per day. Although the first 2 options are not that pleasant either, most of the people will pick 1st or 2nd option, only some video game addicts will go for 3rd. Not a very hard question indeed. In the first option, it all depends on the sport but the second one is clearly the worst. Unless we're talking about University, it's fairly astonishing and sad that one could study for 10 hours a day. Thank god Nony wasn't playing MKP. The reporters head would fucking explode trying to find a way to insult that handsome man. Makes you wonder why they chose to show the beauteous Tasteless while introducing him as an ex-progamer. Which debatable, but that's what the viewer will think anyway. It is even more sad one could play some game for 10 hours a day, I guess you are playing around 10 hours as well Is it any worse than sitting in an office for 10 hours a day? At least video games are challenging... They also dont mean anything while the decisions you make in your office all those 10 hours a day can make the difference between an oilspill in the gulf of mexico or a building your company constructed withstanding a tornado and saving lives. Please kids .... stop kidding yourselves. What does the effect it has on their future have anything to do with weather or not its an addiction the same as any other sports player? Oh wait it doesnt. Its the same for any addiction ... it doesnt affect your future life except to make you unprepared to meet it. Real sports helps you and thus it isnt an addiction, but eSports doesnt give you any benefit which integrates with anything else and thus it is terrible and an addiction. Video games can't help you develop skills for the future? Deductive reasoning, cognitive thinking, speed, accuracy, vision, multitasking abilities, market shifts, math, probabilities, etc.. You telling me that those skills are meaningless? Enrolling your self in to college helps you develop those skills much more faster than playing computer games .... | ||
Toadvine
Poland2234 Posts
On August 06 2012 20:27 Rabiator wrote: Show nested quote + On August 06 2012 20:24 Detwiler wrote: On August 06 2012 20:18 Rabiator wrote: On August 06 2012 20:09 Detwiler wrote: Are they addicted? Yes they are. But not anymore than football players are addicted to football. Or baseball players to baseball. Look to reach those heights in any skill you have to have an addiction. Its not normal behavior to sit down for 8+ hours and practice the same thing over and over. But hey if it an Olympic diver you call it dedication. If its a starcraft player you call it addiction. In reality both are the same thing only difference is society approves of the diver. No, they are not the same thing, because playing a computer game does NOTHING for your future life and is just something "for the moment". Sports will always give you fitness which is good to have as a human being and will at least give you a fringe training for other jobs. Do you think "playing computer games" will look good on any job application? Nope. Having trained as a professional athlete will give you fitness enough to become a firefighter, policeman, ranger, ... name one job where "playing Starcraft 2" will at least give you a fringe benefit and which is needed en masse like cops, firefighters and so on. On August 06 2012 20:14 Dosey wrote: On August 06 2012 19:14 Hyperionnn wrote: On August 06 2012 18:42 Kyrillion wrote: I have an easy question, which one would you choose? Your son/daughter practices a sport 10 hours per day. Your son/daughter studies on his/her classes 10 hours per day. Your son/daughter plays videogames 10 hours per day. Although the first 2 options are not that pleasant either, most of the people will pick 1st or 2nd option, only some video game addicts will go for 3rd. Not a very hard question indeed. In the first option, it all depends on the sport but the second one is clearly the worst. Unless we're talking about University, it's fairly astonishing and sad that one could study for 10 hours a day. Thank god Nony wasn't playing MKP. The reporters head would fucking explode trying to find a way to insult that handsome man. Makes you wonder why they chose to show the beauteous Tasteless while introducing him as an ex-progamer. Which debatable, but that's what the viewer will think anyway. It is even more sad one could play some game for 10 hours a day, I guess you are playing around 10 hours as well Is it any worse than sitting in an office for 10 hours a day? At least video games are challenging... They also dont mean anything while the decisions you make in your office all those 10 hours a day can make the difference between an oilspill in the gulf of mexico or a building your company constructed withstanding a tornado and saving lives. Please kids .... stop kidding yourselves. What does the effect it has on their future have anything to do with weather or not its an addiction the same as any other sports player? Oh wait it doesnt. Its the same for any addiction ... it doesnt affect your future life except to make you unprepared to meet it. Real sports helps you and thus it isnt an addiction, but eSports doesnt give you any benefit which integrates with anything else and thus it is terrible and an addiction. That's just silly. An addiction, in the sense that we're discussing here, is a mental disorder. Its usefulness does not enter into the equation. If someone's addicted to gambling, and wins a lot because they're good at it, they're not any less addicted. Being a workaholic can make you more professionally successful, but that doesn't make you healthy. And in this sense, progamers are generally not addicts, for the same reason that pro poker players are generally not addicted to gambling. It's like the psychologist quoted in the article says - the competitive mindset runs against the psychological mechanisms of addiction. You very rarely see competitors addicted to their game of choice. Obsessed, perhaps. But not addicted. | ||
Rabiator
Germany3948 Posts
On August 06 2012 20:36 Dosey wrote: Show nested quote + On August 06 2012 20:18 Rabiator wrote: On August 06 2012 20:09 Detwiler wrote: Are they addicted? Yes they are. But not anymore than football players are addicted to football. Or baseball players to baseball. Look to reach those heights in any skill you have to have an addiction. Its not normal behavior to sit down for 8+ hours and practice the same thing over and over. But hey if it an Olympic diver you call it dedication. If its a starcraft player you call it addiction. In reality both are the same thing only difference is society approves of the diver. No, they are not the same thing, because playing a computer game does NOTHING for your future life and is just something "for the moment". Sports will always give you fitness which is good to have as a human being and will at least give you a fringe training for other jobs. Do you think "playing computer games" will look good on any job application? Nope. Having trained as a professional athlete will give you fitness enough to become a firefighter, policeman, ranger, ... name one job where "playing Starcraft 2" will at least give you a fringe benefit and which is needed en masse like cops, firefighters and so on. On August 06 2012 20:14 Dosey wrote: On August 06 2012 19:14 Hyperionnn wrote: On August 06 2012 18:42 Kyrillion wrote: I have an easy question, which one would you choose? Your son/daughter practices a sport 10 hours per day. Your son/daughter studies on his/her classes 10 hours per day. Your son/daughter plays videogames 10 hours per day. Although the first 2 options are not that pleasant either, most of the people will pick 1st or 2nd option, only some video game addicts will go for 3rd. Not a very hard question indeed. In the first option, it all depends on the sport but the second one is clearly the worst. Unless we're talking about University, it's fairly astonishing and sad that one could study for 10 hours a day. Thank god Nony wasn't playing MKP. The reporters head would fucking explode trying to find a way to insult that handsome man. Makes you wonder why they chose to show the beauteous Tasteless while introducing him as an ex-progamer. Which debatable, but that's what the viewer will think anyway. It is even more sad one could play some game for 10 hours a day, I guess you are playing around 10 hours as well Is it any worse than sitting in an office for 10 hours a day? At least video games are challenging... They also dont mean anything while the decisions you make in your office all those 10 hours a day can make the difference between an oilspill in the gulf of mexico or a building your company constructed withstanding a tornado and saving lives. Please kids .... stop kidding yourselves. Sorry, my office doesn't save the world. And I work 12 hours a day, most of it spent (guess where?) on my ass. By your argument though, sports are just as insignificant as video games because they don't do shit for the world either. At least you actually HAVE a job which helps pay for your bills. Playing an eSport doesnt help "running the world" in any way, because it is just for entertainment and thus OPTIONAL for a life. I dont know what kind of office job you have, but you get paid for it, so you play a role in your society. I never said anything as stupid as "regular sports is as insignificant as video games" but rather the opposite. Regular sports are MUCH better than eSports, because even if you arent able to go into the NBA, NFL or whatever, you will still have your personal fitness for othe jobs which require it. Thus regular sports actually are part of the training regime of schools and such which make you fit for the rest of your life to function as a beneficial individual in your society. | ||
Dosey
United States4505 Posts
On August 06 2012 21:10 Rabiator wrote: Show nested quote + On August 06 2012 20:36 Dosey wrote: On August 06 2012 20:18 Rabiator wrote: On August 06 2012 20:09 Detwiler wrote: Are they addicted? Yes they are. But not anymore than football players are addicted to football. Or baseball players to baseball. Look to reach those heights in any skill you have to have an addiction. Its not normal behavior to sit down for 8+ hours and practice the same thing over and over. But hey if it an Olympic diver you call it dedication. If its a starcraft player you call it addiction. In reality both are the same thing only difference is society approves of the diver. No, they are not the same thing, because playing a computer game does NOTHING for your future life and is just something "for the moment". Sports will always give you fitness which is good to have as a human being and will at least give you a fringe training for other jobs. Do you think "playing computer games" will look good on any job application? Nope. Having trained as a professional athlete will give you fitness enough to become a firefighter, policeman, ranger, ... name one job where "playing Starcraft 2" will at least give you a fringe benefit and which is needed en masse like cops, firefighters and so on. On August 06 2012 20:14 Dosey wrote: On August 06 2012 19:14 Hyperionnn wrote: On August 06 2012 18:42 Kyrillion wrote: I have an easy question, which one would you choose? Your son/daughter practices a sport 10 hours per day. Your son/daughter studies on his/her classes 10 hours per day. Your son/daughter plays videogames 10 hours per day. Although the first 2 options are not that pleasant either, most of the people will pick 1st or 2nd option, only some video game addicts will go for 3rd. Not a very hard question indeed. In the first option, it all depends on the sport but the second one is clearly the worst. Unless we're talking about University, it's fairly astonishing and sad that one could study for 10 hours a day. Thank god Nony wasn't playing MKP. The reporters head would fucking explode trying to find a way to insult that handsome man. Makes you wonder why they chose to show the beauteous Tasteless while introducing him as an ex-progamer. Which debatable, but that's what the viewer will think anyway. It is even more sad one could play some game for 10 hours a day, I guess you are playing around 10 hours as well Is it any worse than sitting in an office for 10 hours a day? At least video games are challenging... They also dont mean anything while the decisions you make in your office all those 10 hours a day can make the difference between an oilspill in the gulf of mexico or a building your company constructed withstanding a tornado and saving lives. Please kids .... stop kidding yourselves. Sorry, my office doesn't save the world. And I work 12 hours a day, most of it spent (guess where?) on my ass. By your argument though, sports are just as insignificant as video games because they don't do shit for the world either. At least you actually HAVE a job which helps pay for your bills. Playing an eSport doesnt help "running the world" in any way, because it is just for entertainment and thus OPTIONAL for a life. I dont know what kind of office job you have, but you get paid for it, so you play a role in your society. I never said anything as stupid as "regular sports is as insignificant as video games" but rather the opposite. Regular sports are MUCH better than eSports, because even if you arent able to go into the NBA, NFL or whatever, you will still have your personal fitness for othe jobs which require it. Thus regular sports actually are part of the training regime of schools and such which make you fit for the rest of your life to function as a beneficial individual in your society. It's a shame sports never taught you reading comprehension... | ||
Rabiator
Germany3948 Posts
On August 06 2012 21:00 Toadvine wrote: Show nested quote + On August 06 2012 20:27 Rabiator wrote: On August 06 2012 20:24 Detwiler wrote: On August 06 2012 20:18 Rabiator wrote: On August 06 2012 20:09 Detwiler wrote: Are they addicted? Yes they are. But not anymore than football players are addicted to football. Or baseball players to baseball. Look to reach those heights in any skill you have to have an addiction. Its not normal behavior to sit down for 8+ hours and practice the same thing over and over. But hey if it an Olympic diver you call it dedication. If its a starcraft player you call it addiction. In reality both are the same thing only difference is society approves of the diver. No, they are not the same thing, because playing a computer game does NOTHING for your future life and is just something "for the moment". Sports will always give you fitness which is good to have as a human being and will at least give you a fringe training for other jobs. Do you think "playing computer games" will look good on any job application? Nope. Having trained as a professional athlete will give you fitness enough to become a firefighter, policeman, ranger, ... name one job where "playing Starcraft 2" will at least give you a fringe benefit and which is needed en masse like cops, firefighters and so on. On August 06 2012 20:14 Dosey wrote: On August 06 2012 19:14 Hyperionnn wrote: On August 06 2012 18:42 Kyrillion wrote: I have an easy question, which one would you choose? Your son/daughter practices a sport 10 hours per day. Your son/daughter studies on his/her classes 10 hours per day. Your son/daughter plays videogames 10 hours per day. Although the first 2 options are not that pleasant either, most of the people will pick 1st or 2nd option, only some video game addicts will go for 3rd. Not a very hard question indeed. In the first option, it all depends on the sport but the second one is clearly the worst. Unless we're talking about University, it's fairly astonishing and sad that one could study for 10 hours a day. Thank god Nony wasn't playing MKP. The reporters head would fucking explode trying to find a way to insult that handsome man. Makes you wonder why they chose to show the beauteous Tasteless while introducing him as an ex-progamer. Which debatable, but that's what the viewer will think anyway. It is even more sad one could play some game for 10 hours a day, I guess you are playing around 10 hours as well Is it any worse than sitting in an office for 10 hours a day? At least video games are challenging... They also dont mean anything while the decisions you make in your office all those 10 hours a day can make the difference between an oilspill in the gulf of mexico or a building your company constructed withstanding a tornado and saving lives. Please kids .... stop kidding yourselves. What does the effect it has on their future have anything to do with weather or not its an addiction the same as any other sports player? Oh wait it doesnt. Its the same for any addiction ... it doesnt affect your future life except to make you unprepared to meet it. Real sports helps you and thus it isnt an addiction, but eSports doesnt give you any benefit which integrates with anything else and thus it is terrible and an addiction. That's just silly. An addiction, in the sense that we're discussing here, is a mental disorder. Its usefulness does not enter into the equation. If someone's addicted to gambling, and wins a lot because they're good at it, they're not any less addicted. Being a workaholic can make you more professionally successful, but that doesn't make you healthy. And in this sense, progamers are generally not addicts, for the same reason that pro poker players are generally not addicted to gambling. It's like the psychologist quoted in the article says - the competitive mindset runs against the psychological mechanisms of addiction. You very rarely see competitors addicted to their game of choice. Obsessed, perhaps. But not addicted. I said it in another post above already that "playing 10 hours as a job = not addicted", but "playing 10 hours for fun = addicted". Thus the non-pros who play as much are addicted and thus the whole allure of progaming is bad, because it is actually causing quite a few addictions in people who want to be like their idols and play too much. So I was referring to the "general non-pros" with my comments you quoted, because a part of their lives get wasted by not spending important time on getting ready for the future. | ||
Detwiler
United States239 Posts
On August 06 2012 21:14 Dosey wrote: Show nested quote + On August 06 2012 21:10 Rabiator wrote: On August 06 2012 20:36 Dosey wrote: On August 06 2012 20:18 Rabiator wrote: On August 06 2012 20:09 Detwiler wrote: Are they addicted? Yes they are. But not anymore than football players are addicted to football. Or baseball players to baseball. Look to reach those heights in any skill you have to have an addiction. Its not normal behavior to sit down for 8+ hours and practice the same thing over and over. But hey if it an Olympic diver you call it dedication. If its a starcraft player you call it addiction. In reality both are the same thing only difference is society approves of the diver. No, they are not the same thing, because playing a computer game does NOTHING for your future life and is just something "for the moment". Sports will always give you fitness which is good to have as a human being and will at least give you a fringe training for other jobs. Do you think "playing computer games" will look good on any job application? Nope. Having trained as a professional athlete will give you fitness enough to become a firefighter, policeman, ranger, ... name one job where "playing Starcraft 2" will at least give you a fringe benefit and which is needed en masse like cops, firefighters and so on. On August 06 2012 20:14 Dosey wrote: On August 06 2012 19:14 Hyperionnn wrote: On August 06 2012 18:42 Kyrillion wrote: I have an easy question, which one would you choose? Your son/daughter practices a sport 10 hours per day. Your son/daughter studies on his/her classes 10 hours per day. Your son/daughter plays videogames 10 hours per day. Although the first 2 options are not that pleasant either, most of the people will pick 1st or 2nd option, only some video game addicts will go for 3rd. Not a very hard question indeed. In the first option, it all depends on the sport but the second one is clearly the worst. Unless we're talking about University, it's fairly astonishing and sad that one could study for 10 hours a day. Thank god Nony wasn't playing MKP. The reporters head would fucking explode trying to find a way to insult that handsome man. Makes you wonder why they chose to show the beauteous Tasteless while introducing him as an ex-progamer. Which debatable, but that's what the viewer will think anyway. It is even more sad one could play some game for 10 hours a day, I guess you are playing around 10 hours as well Is it any worse than sitting in an office for 10 hours a day? At least video games are challenging... They also dont mean anything while the decisions you make in your office all those 10 hours a day can make the difference between an oilspill in the gulf of mexico or a building your company constructed withstanding a tornado and saving lives. Please kids .... stop kidding yourselves. Sorry, my office doesn't save the world. And I work 12 hours a day, most of it spent (guess where?) on my ass. By your argument though, sports are just as insignificant as video games because they don't do shit for the world either. At least you actually HAVE a job which helps pay for your bills. Playing an eSport doesnt help "running the world" in any way, because it is just for entertainment and thus OPTIONAL for a life. I dont know what kind of office job you have, but you get paid for it, so you play a role in your society. I never said anything as stupid as "regular sports is as insignificant as video games" but rather the opposite. Regular sports are MUCH better than eSports, because even if you arent able to go into the NBA, NFL or whatever, you will still have your personal fitness for othe jobs which require it. Thus regular sports actually are part of the training regime of schools and such which make you fit for the rest of your life to function as a beneficial individual in your society. It's a shame sports never taught you reading comprehension... LOL. Im still trying to figure out if Esports is such a terrible addiction and drain on society why he has 2k+ post on TL... | ||
yeint
Estonia2329 Posts
On August 06 2012 20:27 Rabiator wrote: Show nested quote + On August 06 2012 20:24 Detwiler wrote: On August 06 2012 20:18 Rabiator wrote: On August 06 2012 20:09 Detwiler wrote: Are they addicted? Yes they are. But not anymore than football players are addicted to football. Or baseball players to baseball. Look to reach those heights in any skill you have to have an addiction. Its not normal behavior to sit down for 8+ hours and practice the same thing over and over. But hey if it an Olympic diver you call it dedication. If its a starcraft player you call it addiction. In reality both are the same thing only difference is society approves of the diver. No, they are not the same thing, because playing a computer game does NOTHING for your future life and is just something "for the moment". Sports will always give you fitness which is good to have as a human being and will at least give you a fringe training for other jobs. Do you think "playing computer games" will look good on any job application? Nope. Having trained as a professional athlete will give you fitness enough to become a firefighter, policeman, ranger, ... name one job where "playing Starcraft 2" will at least give you a fringe benefit and which is needed en masse like cops, firefighters and so on. On August 06 2012 20:14 Dosey wrote: On August 06 2012 19:14 Hyperionnn wrote: On August 06 2012 18:42 Kyrillion wrote: I have an easy question, which one would you choose? Your son/daughter practices a sport 10 hours per day. Your son/daughter studies on his/her classes 10 hours per day. Your son/daughter plays videogames 10 hours per day. Although the first 2 options are not that pleasant either, most of the people will pick 1st or 2nd option, only some video game addicts will go for 3rd. Not a very hard question indeed. In the first option, it all depends on the sport but the second one is clearly the worst. Unless we're talking about University, it's fairly astonishing and sad that one could study for 10 hours a day. Thank god Nony wasn't playing MKP. The reporters head would fucking explode trying to find a way to insult that handsome man. Makes you wonder why they chose to show the beauteous Tasteless while introducing him as an ex-progamer. Which debatable, but that's what the viewer will think anyway. It is even more sad one could play some game for 10 hours a day, I guess you are playing around 10 hours as well Is it any worse than sitting in an office for 10 hours a day? At least video games are challenging... They also dont mean anything while the decisions you make in your office all those 10 hours a day can make the difference between an oilspill in the gulf of mexico or a building your company constructed withstanding a tornado and saving lives. Please kids .... stop kidding yourselves. What does the effect it has on their future have anything to do with weather or not its an addiction the same as any other sports player? Oh wait it doesnt. Its the same for any addiction ... it doesnt affect your future life except to make you unprepared to meet it. Real sports helps you and thus it isnt an addiction, but eSports doesnt give you any benefit which integrates with anything else and thus it is terrible and an addiction. A lot of "real sports" lead to serious injuries. Just because they're good for cardiovascular health doesn't mean the joints of most athletes won't be completely shot by the time they're in their 50s. I already told you the benefits of esports that integrate with other things. You can develop a network of contacts in gaming/technology. You can develop a strong work ethic. Your argument for "real sports" being different falls apart when you move away from the most mainstream fields like track and field or soccer. In what way is something like archery or equestrianism more productive than esports? It's not as if horse riding and shooting a bow are beneficial to your health. It's not as if schools hire horse-riding teachers or bow-shooting teachers. By your logic, every posh kid currently competing in those things at the olympics is a terrible addict. | ||
iky43210
United States2099 Posts
It is not easy to stop eating 10k+ calories a day all the sudden if you had been doing it for past years. | ||
Santi
Colombia466 Posts
sorry if its been posted already | ||
Shiori
3815 Posts
| ||
Kleinmuuhg
Vanuatu4091 Posts
| ||
SupplyBlockedTV
Belgium313 Posts
People think gamers only sit lazy behind their computers... they dont realise some of us are actually pushing ourselves and our limits. | ||
Frex
Finland888 Posts
On August 06 2012 20:27 Rabiator wrote: Show nested quote + On August 06 2012 20:24 Detwiler wrote: On August 06 2012 20:18 Rabiator wrote: On August 06 2012 20:09 Detwiler wrote: Are they addicted? Yes they are. But not anymore than football players are addicted to football. Or baseball players to baseball. Look to reach those heights in any skill you have to have an addiction. Its not normal behavior to sit down for 8+ hours and practice the same thing over and over. But hey if it an Olympic diver you call it dedication. If its a starcraft player you call it addiction. In reality both are the same thing only difference is society approves of the diver. No, they are not the same thing, because playing a computer game does NOTHING for your future life and is just something "for the moment". Sports will always give you fitness which is good to have as a human being and will at least give you a fringe training for other jobs. Do you think "playing computer games" will look good on any job application? Nope. Having trained as a professional athlete will give you fitness enough to become a firefighter, policeman, ranger, ... name one job where "playing Starcraft 2" will at least give you a fringe benefit and which is needed en masse like cops, firefighters and so on. On August 06 2012 20:14 Dosey wrote: On August 06 2012 19:14 Hyperionnn wrote: On August 06 2012 18:42 Kyrillion wrote: I have an easy question, which one would you choose? Your son/daughter practices a sport 10 hours per day. Your son/daughter studies on his/her classes 10 hours per day. Your son/daughter plays videogames 10 hours per day. Although the first 2 options are not that pleasant either, most of the people will pick 1st or 2nd option, only some video game addicts will go for 3rd. Not a very hard question indeed. In the first option, it all depends on the sport but the second one is clearly the worst. Unless we're talking about University, it's fairly astonishing and sad that one could study for 10 hours a day. Thank god Nony wasn't playing MKP. The reporters head would fucking explode trying to find a way to insult that handsome man. Makes you wonder why they chose to show the beauteous Tasteless while introducing him as an ex-progamer. Which debatable, but that's what the viewer will think anyway. It is even more sad one could play some game for 10 hours a day, I guess you are playing around 10 hours as well Is it any worse than sitting in an office for 10 hours a day? At least video games are challenging... They also dont mean anything while the decisions you make in your office all those 10 hours a day can make the difference between an oilspill in the gulf of mexico or a building your company constructed withstanding a tornado and saving lives. Please kids .... stop kidding yourselves. What does the effect it has on their future have anything to do with weather or not its an addiction the same as any other sports player? Oh wait it doesnt. Its the same for any addiction ... it doesnt affect your future life except to make you unprepared to meet it. Real sports helps you and thus it isnt an addiction, but eSports doesnt give you any benefit which integrates with anything else and thus it is terrible and an addiction. No benefits? I don't know about you but I've improved my English a lot, learned the basics of computer and also created friendships and become much more open minded since I meet foreigners on daily basis. It's shame that you can't see the benefits of gaming, but it's okay because we all know there is no cure to blindness. | ||
Shiori
3815 Posts
On August 06 2012 21:10 Rabiator wrote: Show nested quote + On August 06 2012 20:36 Dosey wrote: On August 06 2012 20:18 Rabiator wrote: On August 06 2012 20:09 Detwiler wrote: Are they addicted? Yes they are. But not anymore than football players are addicted to football. Or baseball players to baseball. Look to reach those heights in any skill you have to have an addiction. Its not normal behavior to sit down for 8+ hours and practice the same thing over and over. But hey if it an Olympic diver you call it dedication. If its a starcraft player you call it addiction. In reality both are the same thing only difference is society approves of the diver. No, they are not the same thing, because playing a computer game does NOTHING for your future life and is just something "for the moment". Sports will always give you fitness which is good to have as a human being and will at least give you a fringe training for other jobs. Do you think "playing computer games" will look good on any job application? Nope. Having trained as a professional athlete will give you fitness enough to become a firefighter, policeman, ranger, ... name one job where "playing Starcraft 2" will at least give you a fringe benefit and which is needed en masse like cops, firefighters and so on. On August 06 2012 20:14 Dosey wrote: On August 06 2012 19:14 Hyperionnn wrote: On August 06 2012 18:42 Kyrillion wrote: I have an easy question, which one would you choose? Your son/daughter practices a sport 10 hours per day. Your son/daughter studies on his/her classes 10 hours per day. Your son/daughter plays videogames 10 hours per day. Although the first 2 options are not that pleasant either, most of the people will pick 1st or 2nd option, only some video game addicts will go for 3rd. Not a very hard question indeed. In the first option, it all depends on the sport but the second one is clearly the worst. Unless we're talking about University, it's fairly astonishing and sad that one could study for 10 hours a day. Thank god Nony wasn't playing MKP. The reporters head would fucking explode trying to find a way to insult that handsome man. Makes you wonder why they chose to show the beauteous Tasteless while introducing him as an ex-progamer. Which debatable, but that's what the viewer will think anyway. It is even more sad one could play some game for 10 hours a day, I guess you are playing around 10 hours as well Is it any worse than sitting in an office for 10 hours a day? At least video games are challenging... They also dont mean anything while the decisions you make in your office all those 10 hours a day can make the difference between an oilspill in the gulf of mexico or a building your company constructed withstanding a tornado and saving lives. Please kids .... stop kidding yourselves. Sorry, my office doesn't save the world. And I work 12 hours a day, most of it spent (guess where?) on my ass. By your argument though, sports are just as insignificant as video games because they don't do shit for the world either. At least you actually HAVE a job which helps pay for your bills. Playing an eSport doesnt help "running the world" in any way, because it is just for entertainment and thus OPTIONAL for a life. I dont know what kind of office job you have, but you get paid for it, so you play a role in your society. I never said anything as stupid as "regular sports is as insignificant as video games" but rather the opposite. Regular sports are MUCH better than eSports, because even if you arent able to go into the NBA, NFL or whatever, you will still have your personal fitness for othe jobs which require it. Thus regular sports actually are part of the training regime of schools and such which make you fit for the rest of your life to function as a beneficial individual in your society. This is a silly way of looking at things. People do things that they enjoy doing because it brings them personal fulfillment. That's what playing games (if you like playing games) gives you. What does it contribute to society? It contributes to the mental health of a person who enjoys playing games, and therefore helps create a healthy individual for society. Any competition can destroy a person, no matter what field it is. Video game addiction is not an indictment of video games, just as gambling addiction isn't an indictment of poker. This sophistry about "oh, but physical sports give you fitness!!11" is misguided because it presumes that the ultimate aim of people is to be "beneficial" members of society, like automatons working for the greater good. That's bullshit. People want to be happy; nothing more. | ||
KillingVector
United States96 Posts
On August 06 2012 19:32 LlamaNamedOsama wrote: Show nested quote + On August 06 2012 08:44 FairForever wrote: On August 06 2012 08:11 Bippzy wrote: I think the article has much to go in storyline. Saying marineking won in 8 minutes should not be "he won in just 8 minutes" it should be more like "he executed a well disguised rush and caught his opponent off guard. Also, go seemed like an indicative sign of addiction, but its actually BFD in the gamig community. Plus " he plays not because he wants to, but has to." seems a little too over the top. Is marinekings past weighing on him at wcg? Probably not as much as this article makes it out to be: This article is disliked in my mind because it makes a "philosophical" question about gaming and then discusses it using MKP and statistics and government actions..it all paints the wrong picture What are you talking about? Rush? People who don't play video games don't know what a rush is. Nor do they understand how you disguise something. I thought the article was extremely well-written - it brought both sides of the argument, the good and bad of gaming. I think people here focus way too much on the addiction side, which is actually, sadly, an issue (because some people are addicted to gaming - this is not necessarily good). Yes there are other non-gaming examples of bad addictions (eg. athletics) but that's not the point of this article. The article was not well-written. There are countless problems with it, and not simply because it "disses" esports. 1: It demonstrates poor knowledge of its subject content. The description of Terran as humanlike aliens instead of humans (for goodness sake, even the Wikipedia entry for SC races points out that the Terrans are humans exiled for earth. The description of Protoss probes as termites (when the bug-reference confuses Protoss for Zerg; again, see basic wikipedia entry where even the most uninformed can understand that Zerg is the insectoid race, not Protoss). We don't expect these people to give fully informed LR of each game, but at least understand the basic structure of it... 2: Problems with narrative construction. There's no clear timeline or context. The author jumps from 15 year old MKP to contemporary MKP within the same paragraph. I can see what the author is trying to do, going with the redemption story, but too much of the article frames MKP as traversing both ends of the spectrum, but that is a wholly incorrect narrative. MKP really represents only the positive side of the story, not the negative, and the author therefore has to manipulate and twist his narrative to fit his ends, which in this case, means that he distorts the narrative to portray MKP as an addict, which leads to issue #3. Furthermore, the positive aspects of his subject are poorly represented. The article very quickly throws in the mention of fans twice very briefly (once with the fan offering a gift, the other MKP's tweet). No mention is made of the culture which inspired MKP to pursue pro-gaming, or the fanbase which is part of the addendum. This is an important fact to recognize because the distinction between addiction and legitimacy is often drawn in the lens of "anti-social" or social tendencies, and clearly, the interactive nature of esports as a cultural occurrence is reflective of the positive, and not the negative. 3: The author excessively and repeatedly goes overboard with his insertion of personal interpretation, instead of objective fact. Of course, this is worsened by a clear bias one side,negatively portraying esports. Whether intentional or not, as it may simply be a social attitude subconsciously engrained, it still is poor journalistic quality. This one is the most blatant problem with the article, and the examples are numerous. A. the narrative distortion of #2 is clearly the author's intent when his general view is stated near the beginning of the article with these lines: "It's a place that's home to the world's finest "e-sports athletes," as they're called here without irony. It's also a hub for gaming addiction -- a place where deaths are attributed to games and the government funds treatment centers. MarineKing knows those facts all too well. He's been caught in a lifelong struggle between the dark and the light sides of gaming." In other words, insinuating that MKP has been struggling with gaming addiction (struggling with the dark side,) when really, the story is him falsely being considered a gaming addict. While the definition of addiction is its own debate, we will use the author's own words to clear the issue, as he ends with the expert concluding that pro-gamers (ie MKP) are not addicts. B. the dismissive attitude of games as fiction: "He drifted further into the game and, as his parents came to see it, out of the physical world. It was all fiction, of course, but it seemed real to him. And soon MarineKing started to like this fantasy world better than the real one. One night, in his journal, he scribbled a secret: "I want to grow up to be a pro gamer."" Considering pro-gaming an "escape" into fantasy over reality is a stereotypical view of gaming, but a false interpretation of pro-gaming; in fact, pro-gaming would be the merging of the two, connecting that "fiction" to the real world. C. Constant descriptions of MKP in terms of an addict. "Then he quickly moved on to another round of "StarCraft" -- not because of the competition, really. He just wanted -- or needed -- to keep playing." Again, huge authorial liberties in assuming that MKP didn't play Starcraft at WCG because of the competition (...really? does this guy even know anyone who plays SC?), and the not too subtle addendum of "need" instead of "want" as the drive behind his play. D. The description of Darkforce. Self-explanatory. E. The description of MKP's go-spamming, clear framing in terms of the jittery/trembling junkie (when really, all he's doing is pressing three keys over and over, which really takes no effort at all). While it would be fine to mention it as part of the picture being drawn, the author mentions it multiple times, clearly emphasizing this supposedly erratic nature of MKP. As an interesting side note, Olympic athletes also hate long waits and are itching to get into competition, I recall specifically in one of the women's finals where a start sound malfunction elicited a false start [that the swimmer was not DQ'd for since it was a malfunction], in which the commentator explicitly stated that they hated the wait and just wanted to get in, since the wait would disrupt them as they were ready at that very moment. That said, I do think a lot of the vitriol directed towards this article comes not just from the article, but the narrative itself and the attitude displayed by MKP's parents. Having just watched Dead Poet Society for the first time a week ago, it certainly is an infuriating thing to picture when it comes to obstructing young dreams, especially when those dreams are particular to this game that we all enjoy. I agree that the article was terribly written. I could accept an article about MKP's parents worried about gaming addiction or an article discussing parallels/differences between pro gamers and addicts. I would be a little disappointed as I don't think its a good way to introduce people to e-sports, but as long as the article remains objective and neutral, I would be okay. The article is far from objective or neutral, despite its attempt at the end to be so. A couple final lines of objectivity can't make up for the entirety of the article being so sensationalistic and one-sided. | ||
TrivialRiot
United States27 Posts
Edit 1: He would face a relatively unknown Ukrainian player named Kas I AM GREATLY AMUSED also I always wondered why MKP choked sometimes, if his parents are actualy dicks like this all the time it explains a lot. "YOU CAN"T BE A GAMER." "but I want to be a gamer." "NO" "I won a fucking tournament, I'm a pro already, f u." "FINE. YOU CAN BE A GAMER, ON THE CONDITION YOU BE THE BEST GAMER IN THE WORLD. NO EXCUSES" "fuck yeah" but its so much harder to keep from tilting when you want to PROVE you're the best instead of just trying to BE the best. The best player tries to learn from his losses and analyzes his wins for mistakes, not emotionally attached to the result as much as he is to his level of play. still hate that this asshole journalist was allowed to write about this without even learning what a MAP is, referring to them as BOARDS. What an ignorant asshole, if you're not going to learn anything about gaming at all don't write a shitty sensationalit article. I guess the latter is just a good rule of thumb in general. fuck. | ||
MChrome
Netherlands201 Posts
The article is written from the perspective of someone who wants to understand, but simply can't. Whether that's because he doesn't put any effort into it or because the concept is simply too much to grasp for his brain, i don't know. It's not just the mainstream media that think progamers are addicts and all that. It's the general concensus from people who are still stuck with the idea that games are for little kids and that gaming never progressed past the NES. Most people over 40-ish simply can't understand the concept. Virtually everyone over 50, which pretty much also means everyone in a position of power over the media and all, will never be able to understand it. They are simply too old, rude or not - There's a reason the current gaming boom is mostly limited to ages 35 and under. Just wait 10-20 years for all the old people to either retire or die off, you will notice a significant change in outlook in the media ![]() | ||
BirdKiller
United States428 Posts
On August 07 2012 01:05 ChromeBallz wrote: To be fair, sc2 is a completely alien world to most people. Competitive gaming is being dismissed even when confronted with it's popularity and the earnings of the top players. The article is written from the perspective of someone who wants to understand, but simply can't. Whether that's because he doesn't put any effort into it or because the concept is simply too much to grasp for his brain, i don't know. It's not just the mainstream media that think progamers are addicts and all that. It's the general concensus from people who are still stuck with the idea that games are for little kids and that gaming never progressed past the NES. Most people over 40-ish simply can't understand the concept. Virtually everyone over 50, which pretty much also means everyone in a position of power over the media and all, will never be able to understand it. They are simply too old, rude or not - There's a reason the current gaming boom is mostly limited to ages 35 and under. Just wait 10-20 years for all the old people to either retire or die off, you will notice a significant change in outlook in the media ![]() Competitive gaming also has trouble of being accepted within the gaming community in general as well. With the exception of few games like Starcraft and CS, competitive gaming is seen something as players who have too much time or no real/social life. Just go into any mainstream gaming sites like Gamespot, IGN, GameInformer, etc.; you'll hardly read anything about competitive gaming, and for any such articles, they get such low interest/views but disporportionate amount of comments ridiculing the scene. It doesn't help that competitive gaming shares a big bold line, but still a line, with gaming addicition which is a constant headache for gaming community. If the competitive gaming scene can't be accepted by the general gaming community in general, then what makes you think the scene will be accepted by society in general just by waiting? | ||
ZenithM
France15952 Posts
| ||
1st_Panzer_Div.
United States621 Posts
Seriously, they've been doing this for years and years. They also have a lot of articles attacking sports as well. | ||
Shiori
3815 Posts
| ||
Plansix
United States60190 Posts
On August 06 2012 22:44 SupplyBlockedTV wrote: I also practice fencing.. and i have to say that i consider both fencing and starcraft at the same level, yes its not long distance running, but you need to train alot of different parts of yourself to become good at them... i also do running in my spare time..and give me running anytime above starcraft/fencing, because in starcraft/fencing there is a whole lot more involved then just running and giving it your all... so in a sense, i guess starcraft is even harder then long distance running.. People think gamers only sit lazy behind their computers... they dont realise some of us are actually pushing ourselves and our limits. This is the real issue facing competitive gaming, the sterotypes surrounding the rest of the gaming world and geek culture as a whole. Even my startrek, Dr Who, Mass Effect loving friends were suprised when they saw the players at MLG and how professional, in shape and personable they were. It is culture shock for everyone. And after they learn that most pro-gamers are not greasy slobs in their basement, drinking big gulps, we have to explain Starcraft 2 to them. But that is the issue that professional gaming has to overcome. People understand fencing and how hard it must be. We can see the speed, the parrys and counters. SC2 does not do that. We can't see the players mouse cursor moving at amazing speed, or macroing during a major engagment. We are aware of them, becase we all play SC2. But everyone else can't see them. I have always been a big proponent that touranments need to show the player's point of view more. They need to cut to it during slow times of the game, show the speed of the macro, scouting, and commanding units. I would go one step further, saying that Blizzard needs to make the observers can more clearly see commands being issued and units being built. Get every action to be visable in some way so the audience can say "damn, that guy is hauling ass." My most memorable moment showing off pro-gaming was a buddy Nony's stream. His comment "Wait, thats a person playing? Thats terrifying. Why is he so fast?!" The "wow moment" is there, we just need to get it on screen at the right time. | ||
LuckyFool
United States9015 Posts
| ||
Pimpmuckl
Germany528 Posts
| ||
Twiggs
United States600 Posts
My brother and I have... Jobs, girlfriends, a social life, a future and we both are going to school. It's articles like these that fuel my parents war against my choice of entertainment. The lack of understanding... No, the lack of effort to understand something that is different is sooo frustrating. Until the FDA comes out and states that video games are entirely harmful to ones body (moreso than drinking, smoking, watching shit TV all day).... SHUT THE FUCK UP. All things in moderation, the Greeks knew that shit.... so this article is hundreds of years too late. | ||
tskarzyn
United States516 Posts
On August 07 2012 02:37 R3demption wrote: I'm 21 years old. A pre Med student and a Starcraft 2 enthusiast. I'm home for the summer and parents wont let my brother and I hook up our computers because they believe we are "Addicted" to video games. I would say we honestly would like to play 2 hours a night and about 4 on the weekends. Is that an addiction? Dunno. But the whole thing has caused more issues in our household than if my brother and I were on meth or something... Just yesterday we had a recovery day from a huge argument we had last week about gaming. My brother and I have... Jobs, girlfriends, a social life, a future and we both are going to school. It's articles like these that fuel my parents war against my choice of entertainment. The lack of understanding... No, the lack of effort to understand something that is different is sooo frustrating. Until the FDA comes out and states that video games are entirely harmful to ones body (moreso than drinking, smoking, watching shit TV all day).... SHUT THE FUCK UP. All things in moderation, the Greeks knew that shit.... so this article is hundreds of years too late. You are an exception. Most gamers can't limit their playing. Still, you are clocking around 18 hours of sc2 a week? Do youreally have time for your gf and guy friends when you spend close to half a work week playing this game? For those naysayers who are convinced you aren't addicted, try going a week or two "unplugged". No SC2 videos, no forums, certainly no playing. And to make sure you don't just swap the cigarettes for the booze, go without TV or other games on top of that during the experiment. How are you feeling on day 2? How about day 7? At the end of the experiment, will you run to your computer to fire up a game or call a friend to hang out? Most of you will think "Fk this jerk, i don't have a problem. I just enjoy it. I CHOOSE to spend my free time playing, and I could CHOOSE to stop playing whenever the fk I want." You might want to prove to yourself it's true before you start damaging other areas of your life. | ||
Chytilova
United States790 Posts
On August 07 2012 05:41 tskarzyn wrote: Show nested quote + On August 07 2012 02:37 R3demption wrote: I'm 21 years old. A pre Med student and a Starcraft 2 enthusiast. I'm home for the summer and parents wont let my brother and I hook up our computers because they believe we are "Addicted" to video games. I would say we honestly would like to play 2 hours a night and about 4 on the weekends. Is that an addiction? Dunno. But the whole thing has caused more issues in our household than if my brother and I were on meth or something... Just yesterday we had a recovery day from a huge argument we had last week about gaming. My brother and I have... Jobs, girlfriends, a social life, a future and we both are going to school. It's articles like these that fuel my parents war against my choice of entertainment. The lack of understanding... No, the lack of effort to understand something that is different is sooo frustrating. Until the FDA comes out and states that video games are entirely harmful to ones body (moreso than drinking, smoking, watching shit TV all day).... SHUT THE FUCK UP. All things in moderation, the Greeks knew that shit.... so this article is hundreds of years too late. You are an exception. Most gamers can't limit their playing. Still, you are clocking around 18 hours of sc2 a week? Do youreally have time for your gf and guy friends when you spend close to half a work week playing this game? For those naysayers who are convinced you aren't addicted, try going a week or two "unplugged". No SC2 videos, no forums, certainly no playing. And to make sure you don't just swap the cigarettes for the booze, go without TV or other games on top of that during the experiment. How are you feeling on day 2? How about day 7? At the end of the experiment, will you run to your computer to fire up a game or call a friend to hang out? Most of you will think "Fk this jerk, i don't have a problem. I just enjoy it. I CHOOSE to spend my free time playing, and I could CHOOSE to stop playing whenever the fk I want." You might want to prove to yourself it's true before you start damaging other areas of your life. Dude that's just modern society, not gamers. Almost no one can go a week without going on the internet to do whatever it is they do these days. | ||
vesicular
United States1310 Posts
On August 07 2012 02:10 LuckyFool wrote: Wow this actually got onto front page of CNN. Must be a slow news day.... This is wonderful for esports, regardless of what it says. | ||
Shiori
3815 Posts
On August 07 2012 05:41 tskarzyn wrote: Show nested quote + On August 07 2012 02:37 R3demption wrote: I'm 21 years old. A pre Med student and a Starcraft 2 enthusiast. I'm home for the summer and parents wont let my brother and I hook up our computers because they believe we are "Addicted" to video games. I would say we honestly would like to play 2 hours a night and about 4 on the weekends. Is that an addiction? Dunno. But the whole thing has caused more issues in our household than if my brother and I were on meth or something... Just yesterday we had a recovery day from a huge argument we had last week about gaming. My brother and I have... Jobs, girlfriends, a social life, a future and we both are going to school. It's articles like these that fuel my parents war against my choice of entertainment. The lack of understanding... No, the lack of effort to understand something that is different is sooo frustrating. Until the FDA comes out and states that video games are entirely harmful to ones body (moreso than drinking, smoking, watching shit TV all day).... SHUT THE FUCK UP. All things in moderation, the Greeks knew that shit.... so this article is hundreds of years too late. You are an exception. Most gamers can't limit their playing. Still, you are clocking around 18 hours of sc2 a week? Do youreally have time for your gf and guy friends when you spend close to half a work week playing this game? For those naysayers who are convinced you aren't addicted, try going a week or two "unplugged". No SC2 videos, no forums, certainly no playing. And to make sure you don't just swap the cigarettes for the booze, go without TV or other games on top of that during the experiment. How are you feeling on day 2? How about day 7? At the end of the experiment, will you run to your computer to fire up a game or call a friend to hang out? Most of you will think "Fk this jerk, i don't have a problem. I just enjoy it. I CHOOSE to spend my free time playing, and I could CHOOSE to stop playing whenever the fk I want." You might want to prove to yourself it's true before you start damaging other areas of your life. The fuck kinda bullshit is this? Anyone who randomly stops doing their routine is obviously gonna feel screwed up for a few days. It's all about what motivates you to play. If you're playing because you want to play and because you're genuinely interested in playing for whatever reason, then play. If you're compulsively playing to the point where you are unable to maintain the rest of your life, then you can start thinking about addiction. "Most gamers can't limit their playing"? Source on this? I'm pretty sure most people in the West play video games, and I'm pretty sure very few of them suffer from any debilitating addiction. This is like saying "convince yourself you aren't addicted to electricity. Go live in the forest for a month." Like no shit you're going to feel completely disjointed and out of place, because you're basically uprooting your habits. It has nothing to do with compulsive addiction. Habit isn't the same thing as addiction, and the two don't even necessarily lead to one another. Addiction is a psychological condition which is characterized by compulsiveness, withdrawal symptoms, and a downward spiral of lost control. Playing a lot of games because you want to be a pro, or something, isn't addiction, because you are working toward accomplishing something. It's exactly the same sort of mindset that someone who studies a lot has, just for a different aim. | ||
tskarzyn
United States516 Posts
What about hanging out with friends? Or reading a good book? Or spending extra time on self-improvement (academics, work, fitness, etc...). wow... | ||
LeSioN
United States325 Posts
On August 07 2012 06:13 Shiori wrote: Show nested quote + On August 07 2012 05:41 tskarzyn wrote: On August 07 2012 02:37 R3demption wrote: I'm 21 years old. A pre Med student and a Starcraft 2 enthusiast. I'm home for the summer and parents wont let my brother and I hook up our computers because they believe we are "Addicted" to video games. I would say we honestly would like to play 2 hours a night and about 4 on the weekends. Is that an addiction? Dunno. But the whole thing has caused more issues in our household than if my brother and I were on meth or something... Just yesterday we had a recovery day from a huge argument we had last week about gaming. My brother and I have... Jobs, girlfriends, a social life, a future and we both are going to school. It's articles like these that fuel my parents war against my choice of entertainment. The lack of understanding... No, the lack of effort to understand something that is different is sooo frustrating. Until the FDA comes out and states that video games are entirely harmful to ones body (moreso than drinking, smoking, watching shit TV all day).... SHUT THE FUCK UP. All things in moderation, the Greeks knew that shit.... so this article is hundreds of years too late. You are an exception. Most gamers can't limit their playing. Still, you are clocking around 18 hours of sc2 a week? Do youreally have time for your gf and guy friends when you spend close to half a work week playing this game? For those naysayers who are convinced you aren't addicted, try going a week or two "unplugged". No SC2 videos, no forums, certainly no playing. And to make sure you don't just swap the cigarettes for the booze, go without TV or other games on top of that during the experiment. How are you feeling on day 2? How about day 7? At the end of the experiment, will you run to your computer to fire up a game or call a friend to hang out? Most of you will think "Fk this jerk, i don't have a problem. I just enjoy it. I CHOOSE to spend my free time playing, and I could CHOOSE to stop playing whenever the fk I want." You might want to prove to yourself it's true before you start damaging other areas of your life. The fuck kinda bullshit is this? Anyone who randomly stops doing their routine is obviously gonna feel screwed up for a few days. It's all about what motivates you to play. If you're playing because you want to play and because you're genuinely interested in playing for whatever reason, then play. If you're compulsively playing to the point where you are unable to maintain the rest of your life, then you can start thinking about addiction. "Most gamers can't limit their playing"? Source on this? I'm pretty sure most people in the West play video games, and I'm pretty sure very few of them suffer from any debilitating addiction. This is like saying "convince yourself you aren't addicted to electricity. Go live in the forest for a month." Like no shit you're going to feel completely disjointed and out of place, because you're basically uprooting your habits. It has nothing to do with compulsive addiction. Habit isn't the same thing as addiction, and the two don't even necessarily lead to one another. Addiction is a psychological condition which is characterized by compulsiveness, withdrawal symptoms, and a downward spiral of lost control. Playing a lot of games because you want to be a pro, or something, isn't addiction, because you are working toward accomplishing something. It's exactly the same sort of mindset that someone who studies a lot has, just for a different aim. +1 I dont understand why common perception puts technology as basically evil? so what if you use technology to socialize,learn, or relax. why is this bad? if it somehow causes your life to be unmanageable or causes you adverse personal consequences then stop, if you cant, THEN you are addicted and should seek help. so many people seem to think that your toying with evil just by using technology. | ||
tskarzyn
United States516 Posts
| ||
iglocska
Norway589 Posts
On August 07 2012 06:21 tskarzyn wrote: The fact that you compare playing video games to something as integral to modern day living as electricity is nuts. Someone says you should try giving up video games and TV for a week and you say "I might as well go live in the woods"? What about hanging out with friends? Or reading a good book? Or spending extra time on self-improvement (academics, work, fitness, etc...). wow... So we're basically all gaming, internet, TV, newspaper, gym/fitness, etc addicts, because they are part of our daily routine and we'd suffer if any of those would be removed. | ||
LeSioN
United States325 Posts
On August 07 2012 06:21 tskarzyn wrote: The fact that you compare playing video games to something as integral to modern day living as electricity is nuts. Someone says you should try giving up video games and TV for a week and you say "I might as well go live in the woods"? What about hanging out with friends? Or reading a good book? Or spending extra time on self-improvement (academics, work, fitness, etc...). wow... the fact is the internet can satisfy all of those roles. why is it better to do it the old way? is it somehow "better" for you to read a physical book than to listen to an audio book? or read about interesting subjects on wikipedia instead of in a journal? yes getting 100% of your social interaction from the online world would be pretty hollow, but gaming IS a social activity. | ||
mcmartini
Australia1972 Posts
On August 07 2012 06:21 tskarzyn wrote: The fact that you compare playing video games to something as integral to modern day living as electricity is nuts. Someone says you should try giving up video games and TV for a week and you say "I might as well go live in the woods"? What about hanging out with friends? Or reading a good book? Or spending extra time on self-improvement (academics, work, fitness, etc...). wow... Extra time at work...ha. I spend enough time there already. I work full time. Go to the gym a minimum of 3 times a week. Have had a gf for the last 7 years. Play games, go out to the movies/camping/clubs/catch up with friends. I also read novels and online articles that are related to my field or just interest me. I don't have to force myself to stop playing games. I play games in my down time because I enjoy it along with everything else I am doing. It's called a hobby not an addiction. | ||
tskarzyn
United States516 Posts
| ||
LeSioN
United States325 Posts
On August 07 2012 06:25 tskarzyn wrote: per my response, not saying technology is evil. Not saying TV or video games are evil either. But you can't take a week off everyone once in a while? Hell, cigarette smokers (and please dont argue that smoking is not addictive) take a week off of smoking all the time before succumbing to the itch. You don't know it isn't an addiction until you can prove it... your saying its not evil and then comparing it to smoking. why dont you compare it to hanging out with friends or reading a book, you can do both of those things online. | ||
Shiori
3815 Posts
On August 07 2012 06:21 tskarzyn wrote: The fact that you compare playing video games to something as integral to modern day living as electricity is nuts. Someone says you should try giving up video games and TV for a week and you say "I might as well go live in the woods"? What about hanging out with friends? Or reading a good book? Or spending extra time on self-improvement (academics, work, fitness, etc...). wow... You're missing the point. God, I hate when people do this. The point of an analogy isn't that something is identical to something else. It's that it's the same in the way that matters for the sake of comparison. You're asking people to give up something that they basically have done on a daily basis for a long period of time. You're acting like feeling some discomfort from doing this is evidence of an addiction. It isn't. What if I really like reading, and I've traditionally read for 3 hours a night, but then you tell me to start attending dance class instead? If I feel annoyed, frustrated, or miss reading, that doesn't mean anything other than that a) I like reading more than dance class and b) I'm used to reading, not dance class. I like how you slip "work" into "self-improvement." No idea how that works. Unless you're working at a career that aligns well with your interests and passions, most work is actually just there to sustain you until your larger goals are realized. I'm pretty sure I'm not thinking about self-improvement when I work to fund my tuition. I'm thinking about not being in debt, not development of my character. When I play Starcraft with the aim of being better at the game, I'm improving myself by becoming better at the game. It's annoying that people who know they have no ground to stand on grossly and obviously misinterpret a post in order for it to be easier to dismiss. I didn't say "might as well go live in the woods." I said your reasoning would work similarly if applied to electricity. You offer no evidence for why wanting to do something and feeling displaced when you stop doing is actually evidence of addiction. And actually, you DO know it is an addiction without trying to stop. It's very easy to tell by introspection and cognitive therapy whether something is an addiction or just a habit. It's all about the motivation, not the time you put into something. | ||
Ropid
Germany3557 Posts
On August 07 2012 05:41 tskarzyn wrote: Show nested quote + On August 07 2012 02:37 R3demption wrote: I'm 21 years old. A pre Med student and a Starcraft 2 enthusiast. I'm home for the summer and parents wont let my brother and I hook up our computers because they believe we are "Addicted" to video games. I would say we honestly would like to play 2 hours a night and about 4 on the weekends. Is that an addiction? Dunno. But the whole thing has caused more issues in our household than if my brother and I were on meth or something... Just yesterday we had a recovery day from a huge argument we had last week about gaming. My brother and I have... Jobs, girlfriends, a social life, a future and we both are going to school. It's articles like these that fuel my parents war against my choice of entertainment. The lack of understanding... No, the lack of effort to understand something that is different is sooo frustrating. Until the FDA comes out and states that video games are entirely harmful to ones body (moreso than drinking, smoking, watching shit TV all day).... SHUT THE FUCK UP. All things in moderation, the Greeks knew that shit.... so this article is hundreds of years too late. You are an exception. Most gamers can't limit their playing. Still, you are clocking around 18 hours of sc2 a week? Do youreally have time for your gf and guy friends when you spend close to half a work week playing this game? For those naysayers who are convinced you aren't addicted, try going a week or two "unplugged". No SC2 videos, no forums, certainly no playing. And to make sure you don't just swap the cigarettes for the booze, go without TV or other games on top of that during the experiment. How are you feeling on day 2? How about day 7? At the end of the experiment, will you run to your computer to fire up a game or call a friend to hang out? Most of you will think "Fk this jerk, i don't have a problem. I just enjoy it. I CHOOSE to spend my free time playing, and I could CHOOSE to stop playing whenever the fk I want." You might want to prove to yourself it's true before you start damaging other areas of your life. Something that made sense to me was, I saw someone define psychological addiction by what other interests a person has. If there is nothing else that is satisfying, that one thing is an addiction. It is pathological in the same vein as that symptom of depression where one is bored with every activity and unmotivated to do anything. You cannot simply declare that because of 18 hours of gaming per week, that person is addicted. There is after all a lot of hours left in the week, and you cannot know how enjoyable he finds whatever he does in that time. | ||
Ryndika
1489 Posts
On August 06 2012 20:18 Rabiator wrote: Show nested quote + On August 06 2012 20:09 Detwiler wrote: Are they addicted? Yes they are. But not anymore than football players are addicted to football. Or baseball players to baseball. Look to reach those heights in any skill you have to have an addiction. Its not normal behavior to sit down for 8+ hours and practice the same thing over and over. But hey if it an Olympic diver you call it dedication. If its a starcraft player you call it addiction. In reality both are the same thing only difference is society approves of the diver. No, they are not the same thing, because playing a computer game does NOTHING for your future life and is just something "for the moment". Sports will always give you fitness which is good to have as a human being and will at least give you a fringe training for other jobs. Do you think "playing computer games" will look good on any job application? Nope. Having trained as a professional athlete will give you fitness enough to become a firefighter, policeman, ranger, ... name one job where "playing Starcraft 2" will at least give you a fringe benefit and which is needed en masse like cops, firefighters and so on. Show nested quote + On August 06 2012 20:14 Dosey wrote: On August 06 2012 19:14 Hyperionnn wrote: On August 06 2012 18:42 Kyrillion wrote: I have an easy question, which one would you choose? Your son/daughter practices a sport 10 hours per day. Your son/daughter studies on his/her classes 10 hours per day. Your son/daughter plays videogames 10 hours per day. Although the first 2 options are not that pleasant either, most of the people will pick 1st or 2nd option, only some video game addicts will go for 3rd. Not a very hard question indeed. In the first option, it all depends on the sport but the second one is clearly the worst. Unless we're talking about University, it's fairly astonishing and sad that one could study for 10 hours a day. Thank god Nony wasn't playing MKP. The reporters head would fucking explode trying to find a way to insult that handsome man. Makes you wonder why they chose to show the beauteous Tasteless while introducing him as an ex-progamer. Which debatable, but that's what the viewer will think anyway. It is even more sad one could play some game for 10 hours a day, I guess you are playing around 10 hours as well Is it any worse than sitting in an office for 10 hours a day? At least video games are challenging... They also dont mean anything while the decisions you make in your office all those 10 hours a day can make the difference between an oilspill in the gulf of mexico or a building your company constructed withstanding a tornado and saving lives. Please kids .... stop kidding yourselves. You are very wrong saying gaming does nothing to your future. Theres plenty of positive things it does for you and probably all negative side effects are possible to negate if you care enough. About the job side. If you are not casual gamer you get A LOT of training for your brains which helps immensly. Personally I'm interested in playing these kind of games since they challenge me and are always at start impossible and even at the end extremely hard and stressing. And socializing has very little to do with gaming. Playing games doesn't mean you can't go out with your friends but playing games means you are instantly invited to groups in totally random areas in real life and you also will meet new people. (You get real life friends thru games, but there's not reason to lose friends because of gaming.) btw you can get addicted to anything. I can and have been EASILY for week or more without computer at all. It's pretty relaxing actually, makes life go slower. HOWEVER could I be 1-2 weeks without some stories in any form? That would be living hell. Lol I can't stop reading books or watching visualized stories. It's real form of escapism out of this world, gaming doesn't put me out of this world - it feels very anchored to this world unlike stories. Or maybe I'm addicted to gaming, and I'm talking about GAMES, lol game doesn't mean its virtual, chess is a game. I've been playing any game (virtual or not) for as long as I can remember and I always do it thru way or another, never even had to thought how to survive without some real brain challenges. (Go to summerhouse > sudokus for example). | ||
flanksteak
Canada246 Posts
Starcraft is a different game to me in that I still feel challenged playing the game - I do feel like I've gotten something done after a ladder session, but I know that feeling is mostly imaginary haha. In moderation and balance with everything else I think it can be enriching, but part of me wishes I enjoyed doing something else more productive. Oh well ![]() | ||
1st_Panzer_Div.
United States621 Posts
On August 07 2012 06:25 iglocska wrote: Show nested quote + On August 07 2012 06:21 tskarzyn wrote: The fact that you compare playing video games to something as integral to modern day living as electricity is nuts. Someone says you should try giving up video games and TV for a week and you say "I might as well go live in the woods"? What about hanging out with friends? Or reading a good book? Or spending extra time on self-improvement (academics, work, fitness, etc...). wow... So we're basically all gaming, internet, TV, newspaper, gym/fitness, etc addicts, because they are part of our daily routine and we'd suffer if any of those would be removed. Oh no, I eat every day and drink water every day. I have a terrible addiction ![]() Worse yet, I talk to my room mates and co-workers daily... I must have a gossip/social addiction. But wait, I also spend time alone, so I'm a social shut-in? This is so confusing ![]() I find it amusing that tskarzyn posted his arguements on an internet forum. | ||
britneysbeers
United Kingdom22 Posts
| ||
radscorpion9
Canada2252 Posts
On August 07 2012 06:35 Shiori wrote: Show nested quote + On August 07 2012 06:21 tskarzyn wrote: The fact that you compare playing video games to something as integral to modern day living as electricity is nuts. Someone says you should try giving up video games and TV for a week and you say "I might as well go live in the woods"? What about hanging out with friends? Or reading a good book? Or spending extra time on self-improvement (academics, work, fitness, etc...). wow... You're missing the point. God, I hate when people do this. The point of an analogy isn't that something is identical to something else. It's that it's the same in the way that matters for the sake of comparison. You're asking people to give up something that they basically have done on a daily basis for a long period of time. You're acting like feeling some discomfort from doing this is evidence of an addiction. It isn't. What if I really like reading, and I've traditionally read for 3 hours a night, but then you tell me to start attending dance class instead? If I feel annoyed, frustrated, or miss reading, that doesn't mean anything other than that a) I like reading more than dance class and b) I'm used to reading, not dance class. I like how you slip "work" into "self-improvement." No idea how that works. Unless you're working at a career that aligns well with your interests and passions, most work is actually just there to sustain you until your larger goals are realized. I'm pretty sure I'm not thinking about self-improvement when I work to fund my tuition. I'm thinking about not being in debt, not development of my character. When I play Starcraft with the aim of being better at the game, I'm improving myself by becoming better at the game. It's annoying that people who know they have no ground to stand on grossly and obviously misinterpret a post in order for it to be easier to dismiss. I didn't say "might as well go live in the woods." I said your reasoning would work similarly if applied to electricity. You offer no evidence for why wanting to do something and feeling displaced when you stop doing is actually evidence of addiction. And actually, you DO know it is an addiction without trying to stop. It's very easy to tell by introspection and cognitive therapy whether something is an addiction or just a habit. It's all about the motivation, not the time you put into something. To be honest I think you're misunderstanding him. Fundamentally all he's saying is that people should see whether they're even capable of doing it. He never said that being uncomfortable was a sign of addiction, I re-read his post and didn't read him saying that anywhere. It would be just like someone who smokes and is trying to stop, its not just going to be uncomfortable, its going to be really really difficult and there will be all sorts of cravings; and if someone notices that being the case then its a useful indicator. I actually read a post by someone on TL before SC2 was even in beta stage, talking about how his whole body was shaking and he couldn't stop thinking about playing SC2. If he were to try this test while SC2 was out they'd probably find out they have a harder time stopping themselves than those addicted to nicotine. So by your analogy if you tried to live without electricity, you would probably be quite uncomfortable, but it wouldn't be something where you feel withdrawal symptoms (i.e. it could basically be a camping trip, or staying at home reading or going out with friends). But anyways I think a better indicator should simply be to follow the definition for what addiction is, kind of like what you wrote. If it actually gets in the way of other important things in your life, and stops you from doing them because you can't stop playing (i.e. hygiene, eating well, doing your school work, maintaining relationships - all of which should be integral to the well-being of a person except maybe the last one if they are highly introverted) then it is an addiction. But really either method should work. | ||
Shiori
3815 Posts
On August 07 2012 07:03 radscorpion9 wrote: Show nested quote + On August 07 2012 06:35 Shiori wrote: On August 07 2012 06:21 tskarzyn wrote: The fact that you compare playing video games to something as integral to modern day living as electricity is nuts. Someone says you should try giving up video games and TV for a week and you say "I might as well go live in the woods"? What about hanging out with friends? Or reading a good book? Or spending extra time on self-improvement (academics, work, fitness, etc...). wow... You're missing the point. God, I hate when people do this. The point of an analogy isn't that something is identical to something else. It's that it's the same in the way that matters for the sake of comparison. You're asking people to give up something that they basically have done on a daily basis for a long period of time. You're acting like feeling some discomfort from doing this is evidence of an addiction. It isn't. What if I really like reading, and I've traditionally read for 3 hours a night, but then you tell me to start attending dance class instead? If I feel annoyed, frustrated, or miss reading, that doesn't mean anything other than that a) I like reading more than dance class and b) I'm used to reading, not dance class. I like how you slip "work" into "self-improvement." No idea how that works. Unless you're working at a career that aligns well with your interests and passions, most work is actually just there to sustain you until your larger goals are realized. I'm pretty sure I'm not thinking about self-improvement when I work to fund my tuition. I'm thinking about not being in debt, not development of my character. When I play Starcraft with the aim of being better at the game, I'm improving myself by becoming better at the game. It's annoying that people who know they have no ground to stand on grossly and obviously misinterpret a post in order for it to be easier to dismiss. I didn't say "might as well go live in the woods." I said your reasoning would work similarly if applied to electricity. You offer no evidence for why wanting to do something and feeling displaced when you stop doing is actually evidence of addiction. And actually, you DO know it is an addiction without trying to stop. It's very easy to tell by introspection and cognitive therapy whether something is an addiction or just a habit. It's all about the motivation, not the time you put into something. To be honest I think you're misunderstanding him. Fundamentally all he's saying is that people should see whether they're even capable of doing it. He never said that being uncomfortable was a sign of addiction, I re-read his post and didn't read him saying that anywhere. It would be just like someone who smokes and is trying to stop, its not just going to be uncomfortable, its going to be really really difficult and there will be all sorts of cravings; and if someone notices that being the case then its a useful indicator. I actually read a post by someone on TL before SC2 was even in beta stage, talking about how his whole body was shaking and he couldn't stop thinking about playing SC2. If they were to try this test while SC2 was out they'd probably find out they have a harder time stopping themselves than those addicted to nicotine. So by your analogy if you tried to live without electricity, you would probably be quite uncomfortable, but it wouldn't be something where you feel withdrawal symptoms (i.e. it could basically be a camping trip, or staying at home reading or going out with friends). But anyways I think a better indicator should simply be to follow the definition for what addiction is, kind of like what you wrote. If it actually gets in the way of other important things in your life, and stops you from doing them because you can't stop playing (i.e. hygiene, eating well, doing your school work, maintaining relationships - all of which should be integral to the well-being of a person except maybe the last one if they are highly introverted) then it is an addiction. But really either method should work. If you feel illogical cravings for Sc2 all the time (beyond the usual "I'd really like to play a game now to unwind" that could periodically arise) then you might have a problem. Smokers can realize they're addicted when they stop wanting to have a smoke to relax and start craving them all the time and needing a smoke to relax. I don't get the impression that most gamers are the same way. | ||
Account252508
3454 Posts
| ||
radscorpion9
Canada2252 Posts
On August 07 2012 07:05 Shiori wrote: Show nested quote + On August 07 2012 07:03 radscorpion9 wrote: On August 07 2012 06:35 Shiori wrote: On August 07 2012 06:21 tskarzyn wrote: The fact that you compare playing video games to something as integral to modern day living as electricity is nuts. Someone says you should try giving up video games and TV for a week and you say "I might as well go live in the woods"? What about hanging out with friends? Or reading a good book? Or spending extra time on self-improvement (academics, work, fitness, etc...). wow... You're missing the point. God, I hate when people do this. The point of an analogy isn't that something is identical to something else. It's that it's the same in the way that matters for the sake of comparison. You're asking people to give up something that they basically have done on a daily basis for a long period of time. You're acting like feeling some discomfort from doing this is evidence of an addiction. It isn't. What if I really like reading, and I've traditionally read for 3 hours a night, but then you tell me to start attending dance class instead? If I feel annoyed, frustrated, or miss reading, that doesn't mean anything other than that a) I like reading more than dance class and b) I'm used to reading, not dance class. I like how you slip "work" into "self-improvement." No idea how that works. Unless you're working at a career that aligns well with your interests and passions, most work is actually just there to sustain you until your larger goals are realized. I'm pretty sure I'm not thinking about self-improvement when I work to fund my tuition. I'm thinking about not being in debt, not development of my character. When I play Starcraft with the aim of being better at the game, I'm improving myself by becoming better at the game. It's annoying that people who know they have no ground to stand on grossly and obviously misinterpret a post in order for it to be easier to dismiss. I didn't say "might as well go live in the woods." I said your reasoning would work similarly if applied to electricity. You offer no evidence for why wanting to do something and feeling displaced when you stop doing is actually evidence of addiction. And actually, you DO know it is an addiction without trying to stop. It's very easy to tell by introspection and cognitive therapy whether something is an addiction or just a habit. It's all about the motivation, not the time you put into something. To be honest I think you're misunderstanding him. Fundamentally all he's saying is that people should see whether they're even capable of doing it. He never said that being uncomfortable was a sign of addiction, I re-read his post and didn't read him saying that anywhere. It would be just like someone who smokes and is trying to stop, its not just going to be uncomfortable, its going to be really really difficult and there will be all sorts of cravings; and if someone notices that being the case then its a useful indicator. I actually read a post by someone on TL before SC2 was even in beta stage, talking about how his whole body was shaking and he couldn't stop thinking about playing SC2. If they were to try this test while SC2 was out they'd probably find out they have a harder time stopping themselves than those addicted to nicotine. So by your analogy if you tried to live without electricity, you would probably be quite uncomfortable, but it wouldn't be something where you feel withdrawal symptoms (i.e. it could basically be a camping trip, or staying at home reading or going out with friends). But anyways I think a better indicator should simply be to follow the definition for what addiction is, kind of like what you wrote. If it actually gets in the way of other important things in your life, and stops you from doing them because you can't stop playing (i.e. hygiene, eating well, doing your school work, maintaining relationships - all of which should be integral to the well-being of a person except maybe the last one if they are highly introverted) then it is an addiction. But really either method should work. If you feel illogical cravings for Sc2 all the time (beyond the usual "I'd really like to play a game now to unwind" that could periodically arise) then you might have a problem. Smokers can realize they're addicted when they stop wanting to have a smoke to relax and start craving them all the time and needing a smoke to relax. I don't get the impression that most gamers are the same way. One thing I wanted to point out is that I don't think it necessarily has to be an illogical craving. Video games are a form of escapist entertainment, and they can be used to entertain as well as to avoid facing certain negative realities - and in such a way, even if you may not see them as a typical addiction, they are nevertheless as bad as using alcohol to drown away your sorrows. If you're not actually facing the problem, then things will continue to be negative while you do something that helps you avoid taking action to fix that - which goes back to the original definition of addiction (continuing to use a substance or do something even though there are adverse real-life consequences) without necessarily requiring "cravings". I think there can be a fine line from that perspective, and I just thought it would be good to point that out. But its pretty tangential to this discussion. I agree that saying most gamers can't stop themselves is kind of unfounded and probably excessive, but it would nevertheless be good to be aware of how gaming can be abused without necessarily taking a truly addictive form. | ||
ridethecatbus
United States64 Posts
Poll: My relationships with video games is such that: Gaming is only one of many things I do in my free time (19) After responsibilities, all free time goes to games (11) Work/school suffers because of it (7) Lost relationships due to it (1) Play significantly more than most, not sure if addicted (1) 39 total votes Your vote: My relationships with video games is such that: (Vote): Lost relationships due to it Poll: Of those self-proclaimed addicts: I am specifically addicted to one game (7) I am addicted to all games (5) I am addicted to a genre of games (RPG, FPS, MOBA, RTS, MMO, etc.) (2) 14 total votes Your vote: Of those self-proclaimed addicts: (Vote): I am addicted to all games Poll: I believe I am addicted because: It can take my mind off of the real world. (12) These games are just that good. (6) 18 total votes Your vote: I believe I am addicted because: (Vote): These games are just that good. | ||
ragz_gt
9172 Posts
I spend a good chunk of them play games but they don't really affect my work/rl responsibility. FFXI did kind of rendered my first 2 year of college moot but I had no problem recover from that in last two years. I enjoy RTS, JRPG, FPS and MMO but I'd rather do other stuff if I don't have a game on hand that I think worth playing. | ||
LongBow
United States265 Posts
| ||
ragz_gt
9172 Posts
I think if you do something because you feel like no other choice, rather than have a specific goal (either get better, or out of enjoyment), you might have a problem. Like if you can't wait to play this game, you are actually in a good mind set, it's when you just do it without thinking you might be in trouble. I'm pretty sure all pro-gamers have a goal when they play, otherwise there is no way they achieve anything. | ||
PleasureImWallace
Canada45 Posts
| ||
ridethecatbus
United States64 Posts
On August 07 2012 08:03 ragz_gt wrote: The choices are too narrow to really answer. True. I was just giving an example of a poll of professionals that I would like to see. I don't mean it to be taken seriously. If there were such a poll it should not be open for the public so that integrity of the data would be ensured. But since it is an example poll, let's all vote on it and see what happens. :D | ||
LlamaNamedOsama
United States1900 Posts
On August 06 2012 20:04 Rabiator wrote: Show nested quote + On August 06 2012 19:41 yeint wrote: On August 06 2012 19:40 Rabiator wrote: On August 06 2012 19:37 yeint wrote: On August 06 2012 19:29 Rabiator wrote: On August 06 2012 19:06 Fencar wrote: There is no transition from progamer to any other job ... and this makes any concern about potentially wasting the most important time of your life on something trivial (because you dont produce anything while playing computer games) instead of learning skills which will sustain you for the rest of your life. No progamer will make enough money to be able to sustain himself for 40-50 more years and for that time you need a plan! Coaching, off the top of my head. You see pro gamers transition to coaching for various games a lot in my memory.Coaching and casting jobs are available IN A VERY VERY VERY LIMITED NUMBER. Thus you can NOT get a coaching/casting job for all progamers when their careers are over. Coaches and casters also keep their jobs for more years than a progamer is fit enough to be a progamer. You also need additional knowledge / talents as a coach / caster which only very few progamers will have. Its not the same for regular sports or any form of education. What the hell? Did you really say there isn't a VERY VERY VERY limited number of coaching and casting positions in regular sports? No I didnt ... those jobs are limited for ESPORTS ... since there arent any local teams, national championships and school training groups which need Starcraft coaches. And there are far fewer people who even attempt to go pro. Logically, there are just as many coaching/casting positions in SC2 as there are in, say, soccer. Relatively speaking, because the amount of soccer players is astronomically higher. Show nested quote + On August 06 2012 19:42 LlamaNamedOsama wrote: On August 06 2012 18:55 Rabiator wrote: On August 06 2012 17:47 FrosTByTe11 wrote: I think for those saying that video games have nothing to contribute to life is quite false because like anything you do in life, you get something out of it. For example, in Day9's #100 daily, he talked a lot about the things he learned in life relative to his career playing Starcraft. If there is anything that separates a gaming addict and a competitive sports player, I think that video pretty much explain a lot about the differences between the two. There is no transition from progamer to any other job ... Skills learned as a progamer will not help you in any other job ... contrary to regular sports or studying ... and I hope people will stop these useless comparisons. ...There is also no transition from professional athlete to any other job. You might say: "coach! commentator! they've earned enough to not need another job!" - but the exact same could apply to gaming, just on a smaller scale because it simply has a smaller scene. That said, what about the smaller sports, that don't get as much attention? Should those athletes also just give up and go? Now, I'm not saying "yeah everyone, go and drop out of school and try to become pros." The bottom line is that the great majority of these people, esports or regular sports, are doing something they love, doing it because they love to compete, and doing it because there also happens to be some incentives on the side. And that is the similarity that distinguishes between addiction and genuine positive pursuit, not the amount of money that you get paid. No ... as a football player you can also "transition into" school teacher (for sports) which one friend of mine did. The general fitness of playing any "real sport" will also benefit you in physical jobs which have nothing to do with the sport itself or teaching it to others. For computer games that is not the case, since progamer =/= programmer and you dont have any special knowledge useful for anything else needed in life. The main problem isnt really the pros, because they are few in number, but rather the thousands of kids who waste their time dreaming about it and playing too much with their computer while they should actually be going out, meet other people and have fun in real life. They arent told that becoming an eSport pro has some severe downsides, because it doesnt help you with the 40-50 years after your progamer life (if you manage to pull that off). You don't understand the point of my post. I readily agree that sports proportionally have a higher amount of jobs - "school teacher (for sports)" - that's called a [i]coachi/[i], which esports does have, but again, see my previous point about less popular sports, and the lack of a clear bright-line to decide when a hobby/passion is "foolhardy." Regardless, future career prospects are wholly irrelevant. As the second half of my post pointed out: Now, I'm not saying "yeah everyone, go and drop out of school and try to become pros." The bottom line is that the great majority of these people, esports or regular sports, are doing something they love, doing it because they love to compete, and doing it because there also happens to be some incentives on the side. And that is the similarity that distinguishes between addiction and genuine positive pursuit, not the amount of money that you get paid. The original discussion was you attempting to criticize people for responding to the CNN piece with comparisons of SC/esports to sports. Your reasoning was that their comparisons of MKP or any other athlete to sports was silly since sports are much more "productive" and conducive to career prospects. I'm pointing out that career success is irrelevant to the use of sports as a comparison, because people are using "sports comparisons" in this thread to debunk the idea that dedication to Starcraft/esports is mere "addiction" based on the passion that motivates people. Most young athletes aren't thinking of contracts and future job security, they're not 40 year olds, they're kids. They do what they do because they love it. Same with games. That is why it is silly to denigrate, many cases, such as MKP's, as cases of "addiction." I'll agree that there are extreme cases where people are totally addicted and harm themselves with their excess pursuit of games. But MKP is certainly not one of those. | ||
yeint
Estonia2329 Posts
On August 07 2012 08:20 ridethecatbus wrote: Show nested quote + On August 07 2012 08:03 ragz_gt wrote: The choices are too narrow to really answer. True. I was just giving an example of a poll of professionals that I would like to see. I don't mean it to be taken seriously. If there were such a poll it should not be open for the public so that integrity of the data would be ensured. But since it is an example poll, let's all vote on it and see what happens. :D The questions are still completely terrible... Question 1: I mostly play games in my free time, but I also read and watch TV shows/movies. Question 2 and 3: Who would self-proclaim as an addict? And how on earth can you even ask professionals if they're addicted? Playing is their job. Of course they play ridiculous amounts. I had 2 weeks of vacation time, but not a lot of money to go anywhere, so I just relaxed and did the following: 1. Went to the movies twice. 2. Went out for beers with friends. 3. Watched the entirety of The Wire. 4. Played a shitton of SC2 and a shitton of MoP beta (probably about 8-12 hour sessions with food breaks) 5. Read two books. 6. Watched a bunch of movies at home with my wife. By CNN standards, I'm a gaming addict. But replace 4. with "Watched random shit on TV" and I'm a normal, well-rounded person. | ||
Twiggs
United States600 Posts
On August 07 2012 05:41 tskarzyn wrote: Show nested quote + On August 07 2012 02:37 R3demption wrote: I'm 21 years old. A pre Med student and a Starcraft 2 enthusiast. I'm home for the summer and parents wont let my brother and I hook up our computers because they believe we are "Addicted" to video games. I would say we honestly would like to play 2 hours a night and about 4 on the weekends. Is that an addiction? Dunno. But the whole thing has caused more issues in our household than if my brother and I were on meth or something... Just yesterday we had a recovery day from a huge argument we had last week about gaming. My brother and I have... Jobs, girlfriends, a social life, a future and we both are going to school. It's articles like these that fuel my parents war against my choice of entertainment. The lack of understanding... No, the lack of effort to understand something that is different is sooo frustrating. Until the FDA comes out and states that video games are entirely harmful to ones body (moreso than drinking, smoking, watching shit TV all day).... SHUT THE FUCK UP. All things in moderation, the Greeks knew that shit.... so this article is hundreds of years too late. You are an exception. Most gamers can't limit their playing. Still, you are clocking around 18 hours of sc2 a week? Do youreally have time for your gf and guy friends when you spend close to half a work week playing this game? For those naysayers who are convinced you aren't addicted, try going a week or two "unplugged". No SC2 videos, no forums, certainly no playing. And to make sure you don't just swap the cigarettes for the booze, go without TV or other games on top of that during the experiment. How are you feeling on day 2? How about day 7? At the end of the experiment, will you run to your computer to fire up a game or call a friend to hang out? Most of you will think "Fk this jerk, i don't have a problem. I just enjoy it. I CHOOSE to spend my free time playing, and I could CHOOSE to stop playing whenever the fk I want." You might want to prove to yourself it's true before you start damaging other areas of your life. I have off days obviously. If my GF and I are going out, of course I don't have time to get in my 2 hours on Starcraft. Or if my buddies and I are catching a big game on TV. Of course I can supliment it with some SOTG podcast on my way to work the next morning on my i touch ![]() And if its a mental addiction, aren't all things we do repeatedly mental addictions? (Aka habits). Because when you involve the mind you deal with choice. Is this article saying I shouldn't have the power of choice? I do admit that gaming is my form of free time entertainment. It's a habit. And if I quit suddenly and for no apparent reason, It would be weird. Because it's part of my life's routine. | ||
Twiggs
United States600 Posts
On August 07 2012 06:35 Shiori wrote: Show nested quote + On August 07 2012 06:21 tskarzyn wrote: The fact that you compare playing video games to something as integral to modern day living as electricity is nuts. Someone says you should try giving up video games and TV for a week and you say "I might as well go live in the woods"? What about hanging out with friends? Or reading a good book? Or spending extra time on self-improvement (academics, work, fitness, etc...). wow... You're missing the point. God, I hate when people do this. The point of an analogy isn't that something is identical to something else. It's that it's the same in the way that matters for the sake of comparison. You're asking people to give up something that they basically have done on a daily basis for a long period of time. You're acting like feeling some discomfort from doing this is evidence of an addiction. It isn't. What if I really like reading, and I've traditionally read for 3 hours a night, but then you tell me to start attending dance class instead? If I feel annoyed, frustrated, or miss reading, that doesn't mean anything other than that a) I like reading more than dance class and b) I'm used to reading, not dance class. I like how you slip "work" into "self-improvement." No idea how that works. Unless you're working at a career that aligns well with your interests and passions, most work is actually just there to sustain you until your larger goals are realized. I'm pretty sure I'm not thinking about self-improvement when I work to fund my tuition. I'm thinking about not being in debt, not development of my character. When I play Starcraft with the aim of being better at the game, I'm improving myself by becoming better at the game. It's annoying that people who know they have no ground to stand on grossly and obviously misinterpret a post in order for it to be easier to dismiss. I didn't say "might as well go live in the woods." I said your reasoning would work similarly if applied to electricity. You offer no evidence for why wanting to do something and feeling displaced when you stop doing is actually evidence of addiction. And actually, you DO know it is an addiction without trying to stop. It's very easy to tell by introspection and cognitive therapy whether something is an addiction or just a habit. It's all about the motivation, not the time you put into something. You sir should write for CNN. | ||
Xiphos
Canada7507 Posts
On August 07 2012 22:16 yeint wrote: Show nested quote + On August 07 2012 08:20 ridethecatbus wrote: On August 07 2012 08:03 ragz_gt wrote: The choices are too narrow to really answer. True. I was just giving an example of a poll of professionals that I would like to see. I don't mean it to be taken seriously. If there were such a poll it should not be open for the public so that integrity of the data would be ensured. But since it is an example poll, let's all vote on it and see what happens. :D The questions are still completely terrible... Question 1: I mostly play games in my free time, but I also read and watch TV shows/movies. Question 2 and 3: Who would self-proclaim as an addict? And how on earth can you even ask professionals if they're addicted? Playing is their job. Of course they play ridiculous amounts. I had 2 weeks of vacation time, but not a lot of money to go anywhere, so I just relaxed and did the following: 1. Went to the movies twice. 2. Went out for beers with friends. 3. Watched the entirety of The Wire. 4. Played a shitton of SC2 and a shitton of MoP beta (probably about 8-12 hour sessions with food breaks) 5. Read two books. 6. Watched a bunch of movies at home with my wife. By CNN standards, I'm a gaming addict. But replace 4. with "Watched random shit on TV" and I'm a normal, well-rounded person. Then you become a new type of addicts. Before computer hit mainstream, TV addiction was very real. I would say that playing games is like a hobby. But if you can't live w/o in sense that your psyche feels disturbed w/o it, then you are addicted. | ||
Dosey
United States4505 Posts
On August 07 2012 22:16 yeint wrote: Show nested quote + On August 07 2012 08:20 ridethecatbus wrote: On August 07 2012 08:03 ragz_gt wrote: The choices are too narrow to really answer. True. I was just giving an example of a poll of professionals that I would like to see. I don't mean it to be taken seriously. If there were such a poll it should not be open for the public so that integrity of the data would be ensured. But since it is an example poll, let's all vote on it and see what happens. :D The questions are still completely terrible... Question 1: I mostly play games in my free time, but I also read and watch TV shows/movies. Question 2 and 3: Who would self-proclaim as an addict? And how on earth can you even ask professionals if they're addicted? Playing is their job. Of course they play ridiculous amounts. I had 2 weeks of vacation time, but not a lot of money to go anywhere, so I just relaxed and did the following: 1. Went to the movies twice. 2. Went out for beers with friends. 3. Watched the entirety of The Wire. 4. Played a shitton of SC2 and a shitton of MoP beta (probably about 8-12 hour sessions with food breaks) 5. Read two books. 6. Watched a bunch of movies at home with my wife. By CNN standards, I'm a gaming addict. But replace 4. with "Watched random shit on TV" and I'm a normal, well-rounded person. Pfft. By CNN standards you're addicted to reading, movies, good TV series, alcohol, and your wife. You sir, live an unhealthy lifestyle and should seek help. Edit: So was it the TLers that put you onto The Wire too? I just finished it two days ago after a shit ton of suggestions from TL. Insanely good series. | ||
Pimpmuckl
Germany528 Posts
On August 07 2012 22:16 yeint wrote: Show nested quote + On August 07 2012 08:20 ridethecatbus wrote: On August 07 2012 08:03 ragz_gt wrote: The choices are too narrow to really answer. True. I was just giving an example of a poll of professionals that I would like to see. I don't mean it to be taken seriously. If there were such a poll it should not be open for the public so that integrity of the data would be ensured. But since it is an example poll, let's all vote on it and see what happens. :D The questions are still completely terrible... Question 1: I mostly play games in my free time, but I also read and watch TV shows/movies. Question 2 and 3: Who would self-proclaim as an addict? And how on earth can you even ask professionals if they're addicted? Playing is their job. Of course they play ridiculous amounts. I had 2 weeks of vacation time, but not a lot of money to go anywhere, so I just relaxed and did the following: 1. Went to the movies twice. 2. Went out for beers with friends. 3. Watched the entirety of The Wire. 4. Played a shitton of SC2 and a shitton of MoP beta (probably about 8-12 hour sessions with food breaks) 5. Read two books. 6. Watched a bunch of movies at home with my wife. By CNN standards, I'm a gaming addict. But replace 4. with "Watched random shit on TV" and I'm a normal, well-rounded person. I can't believe how much you talk from my soul (if the english has this term). EXACTLY what i think. Watching TV is so absolutely common, even the whole day back and forth that no one ever questions it, because they do it themselves. Gaming? OUTRAGEOUS! THIS GUY IS ADDICTED111eleven. Makes me sad. But well well in 10-20 years gaming will be above TV atleast in the higher educated society. | ||
Von
United States363 Posts
On August 05 2012 14:19 Wegandi wrote: Good ol' CNN paternalism. What would we do without you! Pests, the lot of them, like a billion mosquitoes all poking and biting you, when all you want to do is be left alone and exercise your own damn rights. Who the fuck cares if someone plays a lot of games? It's their goddamn right. Similarly who the hell cares if someone does a bunch of drugs, it's their damn right. Tired of the corporate-Statist media and all its appendages telling us what 'acceptable' behavior is. Other than their faux-outrage and mission-creep, it would be an ok article. Right on. Typical corporate whore media - we expect nothing different from them. | ||
Treehead
999 Posts
Or we could just all get adderall prescriptions, because that's probably what's going to happen instead anyway. | ||
JebOfArabia
United States18 Posts
The way he fielded the criticism from the community makes me think his editors wanted an addiction focused story and that he wanted an esports story for CNN. Guess we'll never know. | ||
Shiori
3815 Posts
| ||
Phanekim
United States777 Posts
I have had to endure that with my poker background. | ||
Zorkmid
4410 Posts
On August 07 2012 22:16 yeint wrote: 3. Watched the entirety of The Wire. Awesome. I recommend you check out Sons of Anarchy next. On August 07 2012 22:16 yeint wrote: 4. Played a shitton of SC2 and a shitton of MoP beta (probably about 8-12 hour sessions with food breaks) By CNN standards, I'm a gaming addict. I'd say that if you do this on a fairly regular basis (maybe twice a week), you're a gaming addict by Zorkmid standards too. | ||
Duskbane
United States178 Posts
He does reference the article, obviously, as it is a comment in response to the article, but I think the message can be clear without having read the article. | ||
TheDougler
Canada8304 Posts
On August 07 2012 07:44 ridethecatbus wrote: Poll: I believe I am addicted because: It can take my mind off of the real world. (12) These games are just that good. (6) 18 total votes Your vote: I believe I am addicted because: (Vote): These games are just that good. That last poll really REALLY doesn't make sense. Escapism =/= to addiction. I mean, I read books pretty often to escape from the world. I'm not addicted to reading though, and I might be addicted to SC2. | ||
ragz_gt
9172 Posts
On August 28 2012 01:58 Duskbane wrote: I'm sure it's been brought up at some point throughout this thread, but I'd just like to point out for any other people like myself who don't believe in a such thing as "gaming addiction" or the like, that you should read the comment on this news story left by a Boudewijn Verleg, because that is one of the best explanations I have ever heard to discount the possibility of being "addicted" to a game. He does reference the article, obviously, as it is a comment in response to the article, but I think the message can be clear without having read the article. His argument is absolutely NOT about discount the possibility of being "addicted" to a game. I think gaming addiction do exist, but it have little to do with progamers. Just like fitness addiction usually do not involve professional athletes. To be a progamer involve a level of drive and dedication that is impossible if you are "addicted" to it. Addiction suggest a lack of purpose or self-control, which is exact opposite of what a progamer is. CNN's fault is linking two completely unrelated issues (gaming addiction, and pro gaming) into one topic with some tangents that makes little sense, rather than suggesting that "gaming addiction" exists. Some people say MKP is addicted to win, which I do not agree. A person CAN addict to win, and it is very dangerous and destructive. This often manifest as risky behavior in order to win, such as cheating or jeopardize long term well-being, and occasionally extreme aggression and personal assault. edit: quote original post | ||
NeMeSiS3
Canada2972 Posts
| ||
ragz_gt
9172 Posts
On August 28 2012 02:17 NeMeSiS3 wrote: By CNN standards, I am addicted to my job and university. Fucking addiction, they should help me out. Believe or not, some people do addict to job / university. Ever heard about "career students" who stay in college in the 40s - 50s by taking different majors upon graduating? | ||
NeMeSiS3
Canada2972 Posts
On August 28 2012 02:22 ragz_gt wrote: Show nested quote + On August 28 2012 02:17 NeMeSiS3 wrote: By CNN standards, I am addicted to my job and university. Fucking addiction, they should help me out. Believe or not, some people do addict to job / university. Ever heard about "career students" who stay in college in the 40s - 50s by taking different majors upon graduating? lol, I spend hours at a time in school than multiple hours of the night studying just to get B- and then with my free time I work so I can pay off my debt. I plan on graduating when my program is over, but by the CNN standards because I am putting any time in, I am an addict. | ||
ragz_gt
9172 Posts
| ||
marttorn
Norway5211 Posts
| ||
Goldfish
2230 Posts
On August 28 2012 02:02 TheDougler wrote: Show nested quote + On August 07 2012 07:44 ridethecatbus wrote: Poll: I believe I am addicted because: It can take my mind off of the real world. (12) These games are just that good. (6) 18 total votes Your vote: I believe I am addicted because: (Vote): These games are just that good. That last poll really REALLY doesn't make sense. Escapism =/= to addiction. I mean, I read books pretty often to escape from the world. I'm not addicted to reading though, and I might be addicted to SC2. I agree. Plus sometimes you need to relax or cope or take your mind off of the world from time to time, so you can continue functioning well in the world. As of game addiction and whether it exists or not? Well I think it depends on what addiction means. I think with any task, there is a possible of addiction to doing it (and doing it adversely). When addiction is used to refer to something, it usually has a negative connotation, and it usually (when the word is used) implies if you play games that negativity affect your overall health (social not counting - TBH I don't think not being social or "going out" is a negative thing if you're doing well at work [for example]). I mean, playing games 5 hours a day, every day is fine as long as you're doing okay at work or school or life in general (for example). As long as you don't get carpel tunnel or really hurt your wrists or something (take breaks often), then video games generally don't have any major negative health effects (AFAIK). But if you play until you die (I remember two incidents which were related to playing Diablo games for too long >.>), then I can view that as sort of a gaming addiction. tl;dr - I think addiction does exist (for everything really). When it's used though, it has a negative connocation. Time "alone" is irrelevant, what matters if the addiction interferes with or has a negative consequence to your life. | ||
| ||
![]() StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Britney Dota 2![]() ![]() Barracks ![]() Sea ![]() hero ![]() ggaemo ![]() Flash ![]() EffOrt ![]() Hyuk ![]() Shuttle ![]() Pusan ![]() [ Show more ] Counter-Strike Other Games singsing2092 B2W.Neo1345 crisheroes349 Happy336 XaKoH ![]() SortOf166 Lowko133 mouzStarbuck44 JuggernautJason40 ArmadaUGS31 ZerO(Twitch)19 rGuardiaN16 FunKaTv ![]() hiko1 Organizations StarCraft: Brood War StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War
StarCraft 2 • StrangeGG StarCraft: Brood War![]() • davetesta25 • iHatsuTV ![]() • Migwel ![]() • AfreecaTV YouTube • intothetv ![]() • Kozan • sooper7s • IndyKCrew ![]() • LaughNgamezSOOP Dota 2 League of Legends |
RotterdaM Event
OSC
WardiTV Summer Champion…
WardiTV Summer Champion…
PiGosaur Monday
WardiTV Summer Champion…
Stormgate Nexus
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
The PondCast
WardiTV Summer Champion…
[ Show More ] Replay Cast
LiuLi Cup
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
RSL Revival
RSL Revival
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
Sparkling Tuna Cup
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
Wardi Open
|
|