| Forum Index > Sports |
|
Jockmcplop
United Kingdom9845 Posts
On June 30 2021 06:21 deacon.frost wrote: I get it, but even I wouldn't write it like that  I would try to avoid it completely, because it just sounds worng in any way you write it. IMOFair enough. | ||
|
mahrgell
Germany3943 Posts
| ||
|
deacon.frost
Czech Republic12129 Posts
| ||
|
mahrgell
Germany3943 Posts
| ||
|
sneakyfox
8216 Posts
| ||
|
mahrgell
Germany3943 Posts
Forsberg has not played a single Bundesliga game for 90 minutes last season. But he played in all but 5 games (of which he was injured in 4) He had one 90 minutes game in total in the last season (vs ManU in CL) | ||
|
deacon.frost
Czech Republic12129 Posts
| ||
|
Faruko
Chile34173 Posts
| ||
|
Deleted User 173346
16169 Posts
| ||
|
smr
Germany4808 Posts
| ||
|
RKC
2848 Posts
Plus the bracket has been kind to England, and been tough on the other top teams. In short, the deck is stacked nicely for England. Really no excuse not to win, and win with style. Why are neutrals not invested or excited in England? Because despite all the advantages given on a silver platter, they are playing scared and just hoping for more good fortune to fall their way from their opponent's mistakes. | ||
|
Harris1st
Germany7189 Posts
| ||
|
smr
Germany4808 Posts
On June 30 2021 16:35 RKC wrote: Why are neutrals not invested in England? Because despite all the advantages falling their way, they are playing scared and just hoping for more good fortune to fall their way from their opponent's mistakes. Because it's inexplicable we're not seeing Sancho 24/7 -_- I don't get it. And Denmark is more exciting. | ||
|
RKC
2848 Posts
No, don't give me a technical reason based on availability of other venues. I'm sure matters can always be arranged to strike a balance between fairness and safety. Just like CL Final shifting to England. | ||
|
haitike
Spain2727 Posts
| ||
|
Jockmcplop
United Kingdom9845 Posts
On June 30 2021 16:38 smr wrote: Because it's inexplicable we're not seeing Sancho 24/7 -_- I don't get it. And Denmark is more exciting. Everyone's complaining that we aren't playing Grealish, Sterling, Sancho, Foden and Saka but no-one seems to have given a thought to how that would work. We can't play em all and Sterling, Grealish and Saka are all in amazing form. I think people are too critical of England's style. We haven't won a tournament since 66 and we seem to have hit on a formula for clean sheets. We would be wise to stick to what works | ||
|
deacon.frost
Czech Republic12129 Posts
On June 30 2021 16:36 Harris1st wrote: They were really running on fumes. On paper this should be an easy win for the English side in the quarters. But with these Euros, nothing happens like it should England will be attacking into a full defense mode Ukraine. They advanced to the EURO without a loss. And they like to play from defense on breaks. So all in all it breaks down if England can win in such conditions outside of their home. Considering how much effort they had to make to win over Cze it's iffy. | ||
|
smr
Germany4808 Posts
On June 30 2021 17:14 Jockmcplop wrote: Everyone's complaining that we aren't playing Grealish, Sterling, Sancho, Foden and Saka but no-one seems to have given a thought to how that would work. We can't play em all and Sterling, Grealish and Saka are all in amazing form. I think people are too critical of England's style. We haven't won a tournament since 66 and we seem to have hit on a formula for clean sheets. We would be wise to stick to what works Sterling and Foden didn't really shine the first two games. Sancho apart from Sept 20-Feb 21, has been one of the best scorers in alle of europe for two years now. Don't get me wrong, I love seeing Grealish and I totally see that using Saka helps England right now but not using Sancho at all (apart from what 2 minutes)? And I'm not complaining that they aren't playing all at the same time. Mount played some fantastic passes to Sterling during the first game. He was the one offensive guy who would've had a safe spot after that game. Kane, Foden, Sterling? Not so much. That game gave enough reasons to start one of Sancho or Saka in game 2. | ||
|
sneakyfox
8216 Posts
| ||
|
RKC
2848 Posts
On June 30 2021 18:46 smr wrote: Sterling and Foden didn't really shine the first two games. Sancho apart from Sept 20-Feb 21, has been one of the best scorers in alle of europe for two years now. Don't get me wrong, I love seeing Grealish and I totally see that using Saka helps England right now but not using Sancho at all (apart from what 2 minutes)? And I'm not complaining that they aren't playing all at the same time. Mount played some fantastic passes to Sterling during the first game. He was the one offensive guy who would've had a safe spot after that game. Kane, Foden, Sterling? Not so much. That game gave enough reasons to start one of Sancho or Saka in game 2. Saka was a nice bold tactical touch against Germany. Sancho deserves more playtime too. Due to home advantage, England has higher energy and fresher legs. The game-plan should be to apply pressure and tire opponents, rather than sit back and slow play. So field players who can run hard and pass well. Teams like Spain and Denmark have figured this out. Keep possession and pressure, and eventually the opponent will crumble. Croatia mounted a great comeback, but their legs were just gone at extra-time. It's just odd that England isn't playing to its advantage, and plays too reactively. That's perhaps where the criticism comes from, which is actually high praise - England has the potential to outplay good teams in Euro, but is too timid to try. Or in other words, England is just making each match more difficult than it really is. | ||
| ||
StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War League of Legends Counter-Strike Super Smash Bros Other Games |
|
GSL
Classic vs Cure
Maru vs Rogue
GSL
SHIN vs Zoun
ByuN vs herO
OSC
OSC
Replay Cast
Escore
The PondCast
WardiTV Invitational
Zoun vs Ryung
Lambo vs ShoWTimE
OSC
Replay Cast
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
