[Poll] Dog vs. Human - Page 47
Forum Index > General Forum |
MassacrisM
United Kingdom149 Posts
| ||
NIJ
1012 Posts
On July 22 2012 06:50 Staboteur wrote: More of a mental thing for the person than a physical thing. I think in a lot of situations a dog's natural reaction to danger is aggression, whereas most people are more inclined to solve a problem through other means, because this is how we've learned to deal with conflict as kids. If the person already knows that the danger is VERY REAL and the dog WILL kill them if given the chance, then I'd favour the person. Otherwise I feel the likely case would be that the person would attempt to diffuse or disable the danger, rather than eradicate it. Personally, I'd probably die to a 80lb dog because I wouldn't "believe" the danger was actually real and would have any defensive killer instinct supressed until it was already too late Remove the sense of morality and I think your average 25 year old male should beat the dog more often than not. mental thing is on both sides though. most domesticated dogs are slaves to mankind. And that does have profound effect on how they behave. totally trained dog that can turn inhibition on and off at will or feral ones though its a different story, but truth is most dogs really do die to human abuse because just like you said their defense killer instinct wont kick in because their psychological training since birth will suppress it until its too late. | ||
ixi.genocide
United States981 Posts
On May 25 2008 12:19 Lemonwalrus wrote: Alright, a few people from irc and I were talking, and we started, for some reason, debating whether or not a human could win in a fight 'to the death' against a dog. For the sake of accuracy, I will present a specific situation for the poll. You and a German Sheppard are put into a regular sized room and you must fight until one of you dies. The dog will immediately attack you (once released) and it will be set on killing you. You have no weapons, and are wearing no protective clothing, just regular street clothes. You can't use anything that isn't part of you as a weapon. Given this situation, who do you think would win the fight? Poll: Dog or Human? (Vote): Dog wins (Vote): Person wins Feel free to discuss your views in the thread. Edit: ![]() A dog bite will do serious damage and if they get you on the ground you are dead. I think the best chance a human would have is kicking the dog and eventually grabbing its throat. A human would win vs a dog in most situation where you have a weapon like a bat or w/e but most likely the dog would eat you. | ||
autoexec
United States530 Posts
Which TLer is willing to risk their lives and kill their pet? | ||
sunprince
United States2258 Posts
On July 22 2012 06:52 mikedebo wrote: lol I just remembered something that my wing chun sifu did in our class once, a long time ago Some guy in the class asked a similar question to this -- like, if dude X fought a pit bull, who would win. Sifu listens to everyone joke around for a bit, and then he says "I have a story." He talks about this guy who in the 1800s was China's best kung-fu fighter, he won every tournament he fought etc. Eventually, he decides that people are boring to fight, and so he's going to move onto animals. The first animal he picks is an old lion at the local zoo. He promises the zookeepers that he won't hurt it too badly, because it's so old. Kung fu dude gets into the cage and waits for the lion to charge. It charges; he moves to punch it, and the lion swipes his head off with one claw. One guy in our class asked "Sifu, what's the point? We weren't talking about lions, we were talking about dogs." And sifu answered "Animals don't fight like men. Men don't fight like animals." That's because kung fu is bullshit. By contrast, any real trained fighter can recognize the distinct similarities in fighting styles of animals such as grizzly bears or gorillas and legitimate grappling arts such as wrestling, BJJ, and judo. Most people don't realize this, but a properly trained human in peak physical condition actually has several key physical advantages against most of the animal kingdom. We have extreme endurance and body temperature control, we have very high agility and range of motion (few animals as have the ability to grapple anywhere near as effectively), and we actually have the densest muscles of any land mammal. | ||
sunprince
United States2258 Posts
On July 22 2012 05:36 cz wrote: Problem is that choking the dog requires you to put your neck near its teeth. Rear naked chokes, Ezekiel chokes, and D'arce chokes are all safe. A properly executed arm triangle choke would probably block the dog's head with it's front leg as well. Given the weight disparity between a typical adult male human and a German shephard, you could also use a body triangle (from back mount, as doing this from guard could get you bitten in the torso) or do jime (assuming you can reach the dog's front legs from guard) to choke out the dog via trunk compression. | ||
SunTurtle
156 Posts
| ||
fatfail
United States386 Posts
| ||
Sorkoas
549 Posts
On July 22 2012 07:12 autoexec wrote: Alright, we need this settled. Which TLer is willing to risk their lives and kill their pet? I can offer the service of my Belgian Shepherd if anyone is up for it. | ||
Carras
Argentina860 Posts
| ||
Ohyra
Sweden59 Posts
| ||
Ohyra
Sweden59 Posts
On July 22 2012 05:11 the p00n wrote: I'm pretty sure you don't actually feel pain in such circumstances. I was involved in a severe car crash with my little brother and had my biceps tore off, shoulder dislocated and collarbone broken all in the same few seconds and walked it off like a boss, carrying my little brother out of the car (who, for the record, only had a badly bruised wrist). I think it took a full 2-ish minutes before I actually felt pain. That's not because I'm a bad-ass, that is because that is how your body works. When you go skydiving you are actually instructed to stay down on the ground if something goes wrong, because the adrenaline makes you virtually impervious to physical pain. I used to work as a first aid at a skydiving company and although nearly nothing ever went wrong in the years that I worked there, one time that was the case and the person hit the ground at an extremely high velocity. She just stood up like a boss, looking around confused and walked towards us, and that was with pretty much her whole lowerbody shattered (and she also had one broken wrist, broken humerus, broken ribs, broken pelvic bone, slipped discs and other stuff I fail to remember). If you really think you are going to feel pain, you are most likely wrong. It can be compared to someone who pulls hair or scratches with nails in a fight - yes it may be unpleasant, but that's all there is to it. It is not dangerous at all. The dog can bite all the way through your arm, it doesn't actually matter right at that second (obv. blood loss/trauma is a problem later on). Keep him away from vital parts of your body and you cannot lose. You do not think that the same principle applies for dogs? EDIT: Had a friend who lost his pitbull about 3 weeks ago, thanks to it getting into a dogfight. The other dog owner actually just stomped the head of the pit, several times, until he got it to loosen it's grip of the other dog. The pitbull behaved just as it used to, until about 8 days after the incident, when it got some kind of sesiure and collapsed on the floor and died shortly after. | ||
kill619
United States212 Posts
On July 22 2012 08:12 Ohyra wrote: You do not think that the same principle applies for dogs? EDIT: Had a friend who lost his pitbull about 3 weeks ago, thanks to it getting into a dogfight. The other dog owner actually just stomped the head of the pit, several times, until he got it to loosen it's grip of the other dog. The pitbull behaved just as it used to, until about 8 days after the incident, when it got some kind of sesiure and collapsed on the floor and died shortly after. I think the problem with assuming that the dog will win because he has just as much adrenaline as a human is that, unless the first bite is a fatal one, its just leave the human to do what ever he wants with what ever limbs the dog isn't attached to. If you got bit in the arm and had enough adrenaline to keep your cool you would just proceed to punch, knee, elbow, stomp etc. the dog until its unconscious. The dogs adrenaline won't matter as much as how many blows to the head he can take before dead or knocked out vs how long the human can stand being bitten. | ||
Ohyra
Sweden59 Posts
On July 22 2012 08:29 kill619 wrote: I think the problem with assuming that the dog will win because he has just as much adrenaline as a human is that, unless the first bite is a fatal one, its just leave the human to do what ever he wants with what ever limbs the dog isn't attached to. If you got bit in the arm and had enough adrenaline to keep your cool you would just proceed to punch, knee, elbow, stomp etc. the dog until its unconscious. The dogs adrenaline won't matter as much as how many blows to the head he can take before dead or knocked out vs how long the human can stand being bitten. But see, dogs can take enormous amounts of punishment to their heads. Especially if we're talking pitbulls or rottweilers (they have a fucking cranium similar to that of a dinosaur or bear!). I believe that it is impossible to knock a dog out cold without weapons from a lying position. AND, another thing, humans have such weak balance while standing compared to a dog on four incredibly strong and agile legs. Unless you come at the dog from above and use your bodyweight to get it to the ground, i'm not sure at all you would succeed. | ||
Al Bundy
7257 Posts
On July 22 2012 08:29 kill619 wrote: I think the problem with assuming that the dog will win because he has just as much adrenaline as a human is that, unless the first bite is a fatal one, its just leave the human to do what ever he wants with what ever limbs the dog isn't attached to. If you got bit in the arm and had enough adrenaline to keep your cool you would just proceed to punch, knee, elbow, stomp etc. the dog until its unconscious. The dogs adrenaline won't matter as much as how many blows to the head he can take before dead or knocked out vs how long the human can stand being bitten. German shepherd biting your arm off is kind of a serious deal. Executing moves such as the ones you described is not that easy when a 40kg ferocious dog set to kill is shredding your limb. You might not be able to keep your cool in that situation. | ||
ZERG_RUSSIAN
10417 Posts
On July 22 2012 07:22 sunprince wrote: That's because kung fu is bullshit. By contrast, any real trained fighter can recognize the distinct similarities in fighting styles of animals such as grizzly bears or gorillas and legitimate grappling arts such as wrestling, BJJ, and judo. I disagree. I've been in a lot of fights and the hardest I've ever gotten my ass handed to me was by 60 year old Filipino guy who did kung fu. I have training in muay thai, kickboxing, BJJ, MMA, and boxing and this old Filipino guy timed my punch, tagged me with a backfist, and hammered my face into the floor with punches. Kung fu isn't bullshit. It's not unbeatable and a lot of it nowadays is whack but trust me, there's guys out there who were doing kung fu when Bruce Lee was alive and they will fuck you up. | ||
Ohyra
Sweden59 Posts
| ||
kill619
United States212 Posts
On July 22 2012 08:54 Al Bundy wrote: German shepherd biting your arm off is kind of a serious deal. Executing moves such as the ones you described is not that easy when a 40kg ferocious dog set to kill is shredding your limb. You might not be able to keep your cool in that situation. And that's where the whole "fight or flight" things comes in. Some people would get bit by a dog and cry and scream for help and others would have their adrenaline and instincts kick in and start doing what ever they could to survive. If anything it's a matter of whose fighting the dog more than anything else. Would most people 1v1 a German Shepard and win? Maybe if they had a plan or were given a strategy before hand, other wise probably not. If were talking about a trained 180 or up cage fighter, Chuck Norris, etc. it seems more than doable. | ||
Dr.Lettuce
United Kingdom663 Posts
On July 22 2012 01:17 JamesArk wrote: Greatly depends on the size/breed of the dog. I think any athletic breed over 100 pounds would chew the shit out of 99% of people, unless you get lucky and kick it in the head before it closes the distance. I dunno man, that would have to be some awfully fast back taking and even then you'd have to get both hooks in between a scrambling dog's legs or it would just flail and turn out. I think a guillotine would be possible if you threw yourself on top of it but I still wouldn't want to get close enough to an angry dog to find out. I also think everyone greatly overestimates their ability to kill an adrenaline-pumping animal with a super-powered jaw. Kick it when it's coming in, maybe try to get a knee off when it's close - after that you're just food. lol at applying BJJ vs a dog. Even so I'm pretty sure if you underhooked any of it's legs you'd have control. Infact even whizzers would be fine. DUDE... you really think going for a guillotine is smart? At least with a RNC you're behind the dogs main method of attack. Even if you lock the guillotine in tight those jaws would take a big chunk out of your side. You're probably right with kicks. One swift leg kick... I'm pretty sure I could snap a dogs tiny legs... This is by far the most hilarious thread I've seen on tl in a while. | ||
Dr.Lettuce
United Kingdom663 Posts
On July 22 2012 09:00 Ohyra wrote: All this talk about rear naked chokes.. have you ever held a dog in that position before? I can say from personal experience that they are like crocodiles. They will snap at your face, and they will hit it, even if you choke them from behind. http://www.bakersfieldnow.com/news/local/37069754.html 9 year old calls bull shit on you. Additionally if your face is in anyway in range then your technique is awful. | ||
| ||