|
Korea (South)17174 Posts
On March 24 2010 16:07 baller wrote: btw rekrul isn't this like the 4th blog that uve derailed into a discussion about urself
u crave attention more than girls, and thats pretty hard to do
lolol
|
Korea (South)17174 Posts
On March 24 2010 16:04 Manifesto7 wrote: Rekrul and I shared a special night once.
if they only knew
|
So let's fast expand into "one-night stands". What's your build order for those and how does it differ from your relationship build order? Is it preferable to allow the other player to take the high-ground in the former?
|
On March 23 2010 22:56 Zurles wrote:Show nested quote +On March 23 2010 22:35 noobilly wrote: I have a few friends who are nice, decent guys but are completely inexperienced with girls. What is worse is that they buy the crap that comes from Korean drama, such as "calling twenty times a day will make girls like you", and "if you buy enough expensive stuff, your sincerity will touch her heart."
So, sometimes when we are outside, I will give them more balanced opinions like "be humorous and confident when you talk with a girl", and "don't appear too needy right off the bat."
The trouble is once I start saying such things, the girls in my gang start accusing me of ruining innocent guys and transforming them into playboys. Their viewpoint is that if more guys are good in tackling girls, the society will be filled with more and more playboys who dump girls as easily as speedlings slaughter dragoons.
To this I say:
"I'm actually doing you girls a favor. These guys are nice guys and they can't get girls now, so if they can they are more likely to treat those girls nicely compared to the current crop of playboys in the market, right? So now I'm just trying to level out the playing field for nice guys who are less experienced with girls."
The girls are not convinced by my argument though. What do you guys think?
OKK here I go. Firstly, these girls do not know what they're talking about, I don't know how old they are but it's very likely that they what they are saying they completely wouldn't follow up on. Girls like this say this type of crap, then if they somehow stumble upon a nice guy boyfriend within a month they are bored to hell because the guy is no challenge. Girls go for men who are confident with who they are, are comfortable with being sexual beings and aren't passive and submissive. They'll say these things but it's already there in their feminine nature and their DNA that they need and are attracted to masculinity and dominating aggressive behaviour. They need to man to take control. But don't bother wasting your time trying to get those girls to come around to your argument. to help your friends just fill them up with confidence, remove their fear of rejection and teach them to take is as a learning experience. Teach them that the focus isn't about getting the girl it's about being the man the girl NEEDS to get. Teach them that they should be thinking it's the girls loss if things don't work and they're the FUCKING MAN. They need to be confident, funny, casual and comfortable and with a certain cockiness. Tell them NOT to buy the girl anything, you split the bill. You don't buy them any drinks, or you say "would you like a drink", "go buy one then". If they're just picking them up tell them to close it by telling the girl to write her phone no. down, then GTFO. then tell them to call her like a week later. Though you might already know all this shit. but yeh don't bother with those girls that are saying nice guys this nice guys that because they're fucking lying.
Looks like someone has some knowhow on PUA tactics It's a shame most guys don't, but what can we do
|
I'm the OP. I'm not really sure why but my previous account got banned, with a gif of someone punching a woman (which was actually quite funny). I'm pretty sure it's because of this thread because I didn't post much anywhere else.
If this pic is meant to show that my thread was created for woman bashing, then I have to disagree. I just related a real situation and asked what did TL.net think, and I made no sweeping statements like "all girls are bitches". I tried my best to make honest, logical and coherent posts, which I believe is what TL encourages anyway.
It could be that I'm just a forum newbie with less than 20 posts under my name, so kicking me out is no loss anyway. To be frank, I agree that me being kicked out is no loss for TL. Neither do I have the power or right to dispute anything; this is a private website.
Of course, I did read the first commandment of TL which basically says that the mods have the final say, which I do not object to. What I just hope for is some slightly clearer guidelines on what we can and cannot post, without having to run the risk of being executed for seemingly innocuous posts.
So the question is, what is Tl's policy on bans? Is it: "The mods can ban you for no valid reason" or "The mods should operate according to certain guidelines on banning people."
If it is the former then I bow out. I have nothing to say. If it is the second, I would like to know why I got banned please.
|
On March 24 2010 16:46 nobilly wrote: I'm the OP. I'm not really sure why but my previous account got banned, with a gif of someone punching a woman (which was actually quite funny). I'm pretty sure it's because of this thread because I didn't post much anywhere else.
If this pic is meant to show that my thread was created for woman bashing, then I have to disagree. I just related a real situation and asked what did TL.net think, and I made no sweeping statements like "all girls are bitches". I tried my best to make honest, logical and coherent posts, which I believe is what TL encourages anyway.
It could be that I'm just a forum newbie with less than 20 posts under my name, so kicking me out is no loss anyway. To be frank, I agree that me being kicked out is no loss for TL. Neither do I have the power or right to dispute anything; this is a private website.
Of course, I did read the first commandment of TL which basically says that the mods have the final say, which I do not object to. What I just hope for is some slightly clearer guidelines on what we can and cannot post, without having to run the risk of being executed for seemingly innocuous posts.
So the question is, what is Tl's policy on bans? Is it: "The mods can ban you for no valid reason" or "The mods should operate according to certain guidelines on banning people."
If it is the former then I bow out. I have nothing to say. If it is the second, I would like to know why I got banned please. according to the automated ban thread, the reason you got banned was because an angry woman walked out of a room, became irate, and was suddenly punched by a man who used a stack of magazines to shield his fist
|
On March 24 2010 04:13 StorrZerg wrote:Show nested quote +On March 24 2010 02:25 Garnet wrote: Girls are weak and fall for almost anything. Being yourself is the key but many people just can't do it right. what? What I'm saying is some people just can't be themselves when they're with girls/other people.
|
On March 24 2010 16:54 Garnet wrote:Show nested quote +On March 24 2010 04:13 StorrZerg wrote:On March 24 2010 02:25 Garnet wrote: Girls are weak and fall for almost anything. Being yourself is the key but many people just can't do it right. what? What I'm saying is some people just can't be themselves when they're with girls/other people. wat is "being themselves"
u could make an argument that someones true self is when they arent around girls, but isnt how some1 acts around people whose opinions matter to them part of who they are? theres a reason ppl can act all suave and cool and the instant they have to talk to a pretty girl they fall apart -- thats the essense of "being themselves"
its like saying "im A- iccup in practice games" but when the pressure is on and the match counts for ladder points or clanwar or w/e then "i suddenly cant play my real level" well then wats ur real level? its certainly not A-, many ppl would say its the second
it only matters how cool or interesting or w/e u can be in front of the girls, not by urself in ur room. a lot of ppl dont understand this about many things in life and whine constantly about how they are unlucky or life is unfair or w/e
|
There is no such thing as someone's "true" self. To be frank, everyone acts differently around different people at different times. People will act different with their kids, their wives, their bosses, their friends, and to strangers. So with that in mind, there can honestly be no "true" self, because it is a variant that always depends on the situation at hand. I hate people who believe in that concept...so primal.
|
Korea (South)17174 Posts
On March 24 2010 16:58 baller wrote:Show nested quote +On March 24 2010 16:54 Garnet wrote:On March 24 2010 04:13 StorrZerg wrote:On March 24 2010 02:25 Garnet wrote: Girls are weak and fall for almost anything. Being yourself is the key but many people just can't do it right. what? What I'm saying is some people just can't be themselves when they're with girls/other people. wat is "being themselves" u could make an argument that someones true self is when they arent around girls, but isnt how some1 acts around people whose opinions matter to them part of who they are? theres a reason ppl can act all suave and cool and the instant they have to talk to a pretty girl they fall apart -- thats the essense of "being themselves" its like saying "im A- iccup in practice games" but when the pressure is on and the match counts for ladder points or clanwar or w/e then "i suddenly cant play my real level" well then wats ur real level? its certainly not A-, many ppl would say its the second it only matters how cool or interesting or w/e u can be in front of the girls, not by urself in ur room. a lot of ppl dont understand this about many things in life and whine constantly about how they are unlucky or life is unfair or w/e
true that
|
On March 24 2010 16:51 baller wrote:Show nested quote +On March 24 2010 16:46 nobilly wrote: I'm the OP. I'm not really sure why but my previous account got banned, with a gif of someone punching a woman (which was actually quite funny). I'm pretty sure it's because of this thread because I didn't post much anywhere else.
If this pic is meant to show that my thread was created for woman bashing, then I have to disagree. I just related a real situation and asked what did TL.net think, and I made no sweeping statements like "all girls are bitches". I tried my best to make honest, logical and coherent posts, which I believe is what TL encourages anyway.
It could be that I'm just a forum newbie with less than 20 posts under my name, so kicking me out is no loss anyway. To be frank, I agree that me being kicked out is no loss for TL. Neither do I have the power or right to dispute anything; this is a private website.
Of course, I did read the first commandment of TL which basically says that the mods have the final say, which I do not object to. What I just hope for is some slightly clearer guidelines on what we can and cannot post, without having to run the risk of being executed for seemingly innocuous posts.
So the question is, what is Tl's policy on bans? Is it: "The mods can ban you for no valid reason" or "The mods should operate according to certain guidelines on banning people."
If it is the former then I bow out. I have nothing to say. If it is the second, I would like to know why I got banned please. according to the automated ban thread, the reason you got banned was because an angry woman walked out of a room, became irate, and was suddenly punched by a man who used a stack of magazines to shield his fist
Yes I have been trying to analyze that picture without much luck lol.
|
On March 24 2010 17:17 nobilly wrote:Show nested quote +On March 24 2010 16:51 baller wrote:On March 24 2010 16:46 nobilly wrote: I'm the OP. I'm not really sure why but my previous account got banned, with a gif of someone punching a woman (which was actually quite funny). I'm pretty sure it's because of this thread because I didn't post much anywhere else.
If this pic is meant to show that my thread was created for woman bashing, then I have to disagree. I just related a real situation and asked what did TL.net think, and I made no sweeping statements like "all girls are bitches". I tried my best to make honest, logical and coherent posts, which I believe is what TL encourages anyway.
It could be that I'm just a forum newbie with less than 20 posts under my name, so kicking me out is no loss anyway. To be frank, I agree that me being kicked out is no loss for TL. Neither do I have the power or right to dispute anything; this is a private website.
Of course, I did read the first commandment of TL which basically says that the mods have the final say, which I do not object to. What I just hope for is some slightly clearer guidelines on what we can and cannot post, without having to run the risk of being executed for seemingly innocuous posts.
So the question is, what is Tl's policy on bans? Is it: "The mods can ban you for no valid reason" or "The mods should operate according to certain guidelines on banning people."
If it is the former then I bow out. I have nothing to say. If it is the second, I would like to know why I got banned please. according to the automated ban thread, the reason you got banned was because an angry woman walked out of a room, became irate, and was suddenly punched by a man who used a stack of magazines to shield his fist Yes I have been trying to analyze that picture without much luck lol.
Looks like they ban everyone who posts any automated gifs?
|
On March 24 2010 17:27 Setsuna. wrote:Show nested quote +On March 24 2010 17:17 nobilly wrote:On March 24 2010 16:51 baller wrote:On March 24 2010 16:46 nobilly wrote: I'm the OP. I'm not really sure why but my previous account got banned, with a gif of someone punching a woman (which was actually quite funny). I'm pretty sure it's because of this thread because I didn't post much anywhere else.
If this pic is meant to show that my thread was created for woman bashing, then I have to disagree. I just related a real situation and asked what did TL.net think, and I made no sweeping statements like "all girls are bitches". I tried my best to make honest, logical and coherent posts, which I believe is what TL encourages anyway.
It could be that I'm just a forum newbie with less than 20 posts under my name, so kicking me out is no loss anyway. To be frank, I agree that me being kicked out is no loss for TL. Neither do I have the power or right to dispute anything; this is a private website.
Of course, I did read the first commandment of TL which basically says that the mods have the final say, which I do not object to. What I just hope for is some slightly clearer guidelines on what we can and cannot post, without having to run the risk of being executed for seemingly innocuous posts.
So the question is, what is Tl's policy on bans? Is it: "The mods can ban you for no valid reason" or "The mods should operate according to certain guidelines on banning people."
If it is the former then I bow out. I have nothing to say. If it is the second, I would like to know why I got banned please. according to the automated ban thread, the reason you got banned was because an angry woman walked out of a room, became irate, and was suddenly punched by a man who used a stack of magazines to shield his fist Yes I have been trying to analyze that picture without much luck lol. Looks like they ban everyone who posts any automated gifs?
I didn't post that gif. I mean its posted as "the reason I got banned."
|
On March 24 2010 17:11 Setsuna. wrote: There is no such thing as someone's "true" self. To be frank, everyone acts differently around different people at different times. People will act different with their kids, their wives, their bosses, their friends, and to strangers. So with that in mind, there can honestly be no "true" self, because it is a variant that always depends on the situation at hand. I hate people who believe in that concept...so primal.
don't the japanese have concepts called honne and tatamae..?
Honne (本音?) refers to a person's true feelings and desires
Tatemae (建前?), literally "façade," is the behaviour and opinions one displays in public.
I believe there is a true self...you can say that your true self is being different around different people.
|
On March 24 2010 17:11 Setsuna. wrote: There is no such thing as someone's "true" self. To be frank, everyone acts differently around different people at different times. People will act different with their kids, their wives, their bosses, their friends, and to strangers. So with that in mind, there can honestly be no "true" self, because it is a variant that always depends on the situation at hand. I hate people who believe in that concept...so primal.
I think it's because you misunderstand what people mean then. The more things people try to "front", the less honest they are in their interaction with others. They don't do what they find natural, but do what they have been told they should by others. This really fucks things up, as people often don't know what they get and things become artificial or superficial socially. Removing this mask allowes people to get in depth with each other, instead of dealing with some perceived persona. Basically it's all about people letting their insecurities or needs get to them, therefore needing to "strategize" their relationship to other people more than necessary.
|
On March 24 2010 18:02 mel_ee wrote:Show nested quote +On March 24 2010 17:11 Setsuna. wrote: There is no such thing as someone's "true" self. To be frank, everyone acts differently around different people at different times. People will act different with their kids, their wives, their bosses, their friends, and to strangers. So with that in mind, there can honestly be no "true" self, because it is a variant that always depends on the situation at hand. I hate people who believe in that concept...so primal. don't the japanese have concepts called honne and tatamae..? Honne (本音?) refers to a person's true feelings and desires Tatemae (建前?), literally "façade," is the behaviour and opinions one displays in public. I believe there is a true self...you can say that your true self is being different around different people. the japanese also have concepts called bukkake and futanari?
which i believe are equally applicable to girl help threads
Bukkake (浓精沐浴?) refers to a sexual practice where a woman is ejaculated on by several men
Futanari (雌雄同体?), literally, a hentai character that possesses both a vagina and a penis
|
On March 24 2010 18:02 mel_ee wrote:Show nested quote +On March 24 2010 17:11 Setsuna. wrote: There is no such thing as someone's "true" self. To be frank, everyone acts differently around different people at different times. People will act different with their kids, their wives, their bosses, their friends, and to strangers. So with that in mind, there can honestly be no "true" self, because it is a variant that always depends on the situation at hand. I hate people who believe in that concept...so primal. don't the japanese have concepts called honne and tatamae..? Honne (本音?) refers to a person's true feelings and desires Tatemae (建前?), literally "façade," is the behaviour and opinions one displays in public. I believe there is a true self...you can say that your true self is being different around different people.
How did this turn into a japanese discussion thread? Secondly a general statement like that does not apply to all Japanese people....it's like saying every asian eats with chop sticks, which is for the most part true, but does not absolutely apply 100%.
|
On March 23 2010 22:40 baller wrote: i got my girlfriend Claire by going the friends first nice guy route. i first met her in class and she became friends with me mainly because i was good at the subject and took notes for her when she wasnt there. then we talked a lot on internet chat and i listened to all her complaints about the guys she dated, wondering when she will realize i was the one for her. even one time when her boyfriend canceled on her, i took her out to a movie and paid for everything, it was very "date" like but she didnt kiss me or anything at the end.
eventually, after months of doing this, Claire broke up with her bf and i talked to her about it. i was very hopeful that she'd finally notice me, but she dated another guy who was just as big an asshole right away. i was sad, but i didnt end our friendship -- she was too important to me. then for her birthday, she was sick and very sad. her new bf got her some shitty flowers and candy, but i made her this DVD with all her favorite songs and filmed her favorite locations around the city. i spent hours on it. she finally realized that she was with the wrong guy.
right before winter break she texted me, breathless and happy that she finally realized it. i was so happy and literally cried in the cab (i was on the way to the airport to go home) when i read the texts that she wanted to be with me. i felt on top of the world and that my months of hardship were finally rewarded. i couldnt wait until after break, so i yelled to the cabby yo homes smell you later, looked at my new girlfriend i was finally there to sit on my throne as the boyfriend of Claire.
Okay there Taylor Swift.
|
On March 27 2010 13:48 hahaimhenry wrote:Show nested quote +On March 23 2010 22:40 baller wrote: i got my girlfriend Claire by going the friends first nice guy route. i first met her in class and she became friends with me mainly because i was good at the subject and took notes for her when she wasnt there. then we talked a lot on internet chat and i listened to all her complaints about the guys she dated, wondering when she will realize i was the one for her. even one time when her boyfriend canceled on her, i took her out to a movie and paid for everything, it was very "date" like but she didnt kiss me or anything at the end.
eventually, after months of doing this, Claire broke up with her bf and i talked to her about it. i was very hopeful that she'd finally notice me, but she dated another guy who was just as big an asshole right away. i was sad, but i didnt end our friendship -- she was too important to me. then for her birthday, she was sick and very sad. her new bf got her some shitty flowers and candy, but i made her this DVD with all her favorite songs and filmed her favorite locations around the city. i spent hours on it. she finally realized that she was with the wrong guy.
right before winter break she texted me, breathless and happy that she finally realized it. i was so happy and literally cried in the cab (i was on the way to the airport to go home) when i read the texts that she wanted to be with me. i felt on top of the world and that my months of hardship were finally rewarded. i couldnt wait until after break, so i yelled to the cabby yo homes smell you later, looked at my new girlfriend i was finally there to sit on my throne as the boyfriend of Claire. Okay there Taylor Swift. what is this from lol?
|
girls like confidence...trying to impress them shows lack in confidence. Be yourself and you will go far.
|
|
|
|