|
On January 22 2013 18:28 JacobStrangelove wrote: Why are you so scared of the safe option? I can't have a game plan past this day.
Are you asking me? You said you RB'ed me, but I didnt get any notification. So that confirms you as scum.
|
On January 22 2013 18:27 JacobStrangelove wrote:4 scum can concentrate votes 3 scum and 1 sk can't. Show nested quote + How would you have gotten killed during the night if you were RB? If your story is true you'd have me and zare as scum/SK. After lynching one of us, there would only be 1 left for you to RB so you wouldnt die during night. I'm sorry your argument makes no sense.
Oh that does make sense. Didn't think of that.... In that case we should 100% lynch zara because then I can just roleblock the other scum. If that doesn't happen you can just lynch me. If I was buying for time does it matter? It's still safer for town to lynch zara first and you know it.
Stop wasting our time! It doesn't make sense cause you are lying scum.
|
I'm asking you showing that you are scum. (although it would make sense from a town perspective as well though) also trying to shut me up by saying it's a waste of time is poor play. Although it's got to the point where we both know what the other person is and it's down to you say I'm scum I say your scum it seems. I just hope the town make the right choice. ie; trotske and shz.
|
Germany2686 Posts
One question for zebe, zare, and Trotske: If Jacob is lying and not RB, why would Mocsta lie about being RB'd on N1? Mocsta could not have known that there isn't a RB. If there isn't a roleblocker, Mocsta is fine, but if there is a RB and that RB did not roleblock Mocsta, he would have been called out for it. And town should not lie about being RB'd.
This is the one thing that I'm very concerned about.
|
On January 22 2013 18:51 JacobStrangelove wrote: I'm asking you showing that you are scum.
huh? What does that mean? It just seems to me that you forgot that because of your story I already know you are scum.
|
On January 22 2013 18:59 shz wrote: One question for zebe, zare, and Trotske: If Jacob is lying and not RB, why would Mocsta lie about being RB'd on N1? Mocsta could not have known that there isn't a RB. If there isn't a roleblocker, Mocsta is fine, but if there is a RB and that RB did not roleblock Mocsta, he would have been called out for it. And town should not lie about being RB'd.
This is the one thing that I'm very concerned about.
Easy peasy Mocsta knows there is no scum RB, or if there is one, he could tell em not to use their power. So if someone else claims a RB, then it seems that there is a town and a scum RB.
|
Germany2686 Posts
On January 22 2013 19:04 zebezt wrote:Show nested quote +On January 22 2013 18:59 shz wrote: One question for zebe, zare, and Trotske: If Jacob is lying and not RB, why would Mocsta lie about being RB'd on N1? Mocsta could not have known that there isn't a RB. If there isn't a roleblocker, Mocsta is fine, but if there is a RB and that RB did not roleblock Mocsta, he would have been called out for it. And town should not lie about being RB'd.
This is the one thing that I'm very concerned about. Easy peasy Mocsta knows there is no scum RB, or if there is one, he could tell em not to use their power. So if someone else claims a RB, then it seems that there is a town and a scum RB.
The only thing that makes sense if there isn't a scum RB. What it really looks like. For a scum RB not to use their power is just dumb just to do that little claim.
So, in your opinion, it is more likely that Jacob is lying, than that Mocsta was not?
|
I agree its far more likely that there is no scum RB. doesn't make much sense in such a small game.
What do you mean with your question? They were both lying.
|
Germany2686 Posts
Yea. That sentence does not make sense.
|
On January 22 2013 19:00 zebezt wrote:Show nested quote +On January 22 2013 18:51 JacobStrangelove wrote: I'm asking you showing that you are scum. huh? What does that mean? It just seems to me that you forgot that because of your story I already know you are scum.
Yeah I know you are scum and you know I am scum... we went over the fact that our stories cancel each other out in this regard.
On January 22 2013 19:13 shz wrote:Show nested quote +On January 22 2013 19:04 zebezt wrote:On January 22 2013 18:59 shz wrote: One question for zebe, zare, and Trotske: If Jacob is lying and not RB, why would Mocsta lie about being RB'd on N1? Mocsta could not have known that there isn't a RB. If there isn't a roleblocker, Mocsta is fine, but if there is a RB and that RB did not roleblock Mocsta, he would have been called out for it. And town should not lie about being RB'd.
This is the one thing that I'm very concerned about. Easy peasy Mocsta knows there is no scum RB, or if there is one, he could tell em not to use their power. So if someone else claims a RB, then it seems that there is a town and a scum RB. The only thing that makes sense if there isn't a scum RB. What it really looks like. For a scum RB not to use their power is just dumb just to do that little claim. So, in your opinion, it is more likely that Jacob is lying, than that Mocsta was not?
Exactly I pointed out there was no rb claims in the entire thread apart from mocca. if there was scum rb'er he would have used it on someone..... But mocca could gain cred if he knew there was no scum rb'er and obviously a town one. We can't both be lying that wouldn't make sense.
|
Germany2686 Posts
Why do you think zebezt is scum all of a sudden?
|
All of a sudden? I had suspicions about him for ages but I put them aside in favour of zara. The fact I rb'ed both of them on separate occasions with still a nk led me to believe that zara was mafia and zeb was sk. Scum is a universal word for both.
|
as sk you want to start killing later on. I imagine the last two days the sk was trying to kill but I role blocked him and mafia at separate times leaving only one nk.
|
On January 22 2013 19:25 JacobStrangelove wrote:Show nested quote +On January 22 2013 19:00 zebezt wrote:On January 22 2013 18:51 JacobStrangelove wrote: I'm asking you showing that you are scum. huh? What does that mean? It just seems to me that you forgot that because of your story I already know you are scum. Yeah I know you are scum and you know I am scum... we went over the fact that our stories cancel each other out in this regard. Show nested quote +On January 22 2013 19:13 shz wrote:On January 22 2013 19:04 zebezt wrote:On January 22 2013 18:59 shz wrote: One question for zebe, zare, and Trotske: If Jacob is lying and not RB, why would Mocsta lie about being RB'd on N1? Mocsta could not have known that there isn't a RB. If there isn't a roleblocker, Mocsta is fine, but if there is a RB and that RB did not roleblock Mocsta, he would have been called out for it. And town should not lie about being RB'd.
This is the one thing that I'm very concerned about. Easy peasy Mocsta knows there is no scum RB, or if there is one, he could tell em not to use their power. So if someone else claims a RB, then it seems that there is a town and a scum RB. The only thing that makes sense if there isn't a scum RB. What it really looks like. For a scum RB not to use their power is just dumb just to do that little claim. So, in your opinion, it is more likely that Jacob is lying, than that Mocsta was not? Exactly I pointed out there was no rb claims in the entire thread apart from mocca. if there was scum rb'er he would have used it on someone..... But mocca could gain cred if he knew there was no scum rb'er and obviously a town one. We can't both be lying that wouldn't make sense.
Mocsta lies to gain some towncred. You lie to save your ass from lynching. Makes sense to me.
I mentioned the possibility of a scum RB to make a complete argument, not because it was likely. But like I said, if Mocsta knows there is no scum RB he can safely claim being RB'ed. Because another RB claim could then be attributed to scum RB'er.
|
Wat. Well if there was "not likely" a scum roleblocker what does that make me? "Likely" a town Roleblocker. Besides I will get lynched tomorrow anyway if I was lying.
|
*sigh Are you dense or acting dense?
I never claimed you were a scum RB. Just scum.
|
Just dense is seems, forgive me for not being able to see myself from a perspective I wouldn't have. Almost ironic coming from you. I thought you were an idiot until recently.
But when zara flips scum I can then confirm myself via night actions. If I am town this means 100% win chance. If I am scum it still means 100% win chance for town.
|
ebwop:100% isn't a chance... *facepalm*
|
Technically it's still a chance.
Anyway, I explained before, if there is 4 scum it is not safe.
I'm beginning to appreciate this pressuring people. If some people are pressured they seem to make less and less sense. Happened with Mocsta first. Seems to work well on you too.
|
-_- 4 scum would be completely imbalanced. Besides you can just lynch me if I don't rb someone. So not only do there have to be 4 scum but me not being rb'er for your theory to make sense it;s a stretch. and if I am not rb'er you find out in the night.
|
|
|
|