EPT
Knowing a 100% scum I just don't want to see this game slipping away from us.
Newbie Mini Mafia XXXV - Page 55
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
zebezt
185 Posts
Knowing a 100% scum I just don't want to see this game slipping away from us. | ||
|
zarepath
United States1626 Posts
I don't know how Shz looks scummier by the second when he is still the person who hammered Mocsta down when he could have, through inaction, allowed our detective to die. The thing is that both zebezt and I independently agree that Jacob was lying about us. Jacob STILL has yet to explain why he lied about his role, why he supposedly RB'd zebezt, and the other questions I've listed above. His defense/explanation so far consists mostly of setup theory and only aims to delay, not to convince of innocence or convict scum. | ||
|
JacobStrangelove
Australia1572 Posts
You are saying lynch me then Z but if you lynch me then the sk plus mafia win the game. Because you are the only one that would know if there were 4 scum then the obvious lynch would be zara first then me. Because this order proves if zeb is sk or not and proves if I am scum or not. | ||
|
JacobStrangelove
Australia1572 Posts
Why not Rb zebzet? I rb'ed you did you want me to rb shz or trotske? I am proving my innocence via set up theory. But this only works if zara gets lynched. I can't convince you two that I an innocence because you are both mafia/sk. I already pointed out why delaying is pointless..... but you obviously don't get it (or you get it all to well) due to being mafia. | ||
|
JacobStrangelove
Australia1572 Posts
If you do lynch me today to find out I didn't lie you are going to get so much hate from the obs thread and lose the game, just saying. | ||
|
JacobStrangelove
Australia1572 Posts
| ||
|
JacobStrangelove
Australia1572 Posts
| ||
|
Trotske
410 Posts
| ||
|
JacobStrangelove
Australia1572 Posts
On January 22 2013 23:08 Trotske wrote: Just got here I was catching up How about you explain to me again why you are the worse lynch. Why do you think there is an SK? there has been no evidence of an extra NK since D1 and the vigi died. Did you read what I said? With the way the role blocks worked out I would have prevented mafia or sk from killing someone for a few days and sk doesn't want to kill anyone early on to give themselves away immediately without knowing who scum are. I am the worst lynch because if you lynch me first there is uncertainty due to the sk and mafia. But if Zara was to flip town then you could just kill me and be over with the game in certainty. See if I am lying you get to lynch me anyway. If they are lying scum wins. There is no point for me to hold onto the game needlessly as town. This is all in the conversation that just took place. Read it carefully. | ||
|
JacobStrangelove
Australia1572 Posts
| ||
|
JacobStrangelove
Australia1572 Posts
| ||
|
JacobStrangelove
Australia1572 Posts
| ||
|
Trotske
410 Posts
| ||
|
zebezt
185 Posts
JSL likes you to overlook the fact that he roleclaimed way to late to be believable. The only reason he has for his late roleclaim (doesn't want to get nightkilled) makes no sense, since there was no risk of getting nightkilled as I pointed out. He thinks somehow 4 scum is waaaaaaaaaaay less likely than 3 scum + SK | ||
|
zebezt
185 Posts
| ||
|
zarepath
United States1626 Posts
Note that Mocsta had just flipped Godfather, and Spag and myself were the two most suspicious people after that. Why RB zebezt instead of one of us? | ||
|
zarepath
United States1626 Posts
On January 22 2013 23:24 zebezt wrote: Now that I think about it.. Laguerta would have Would have what? | ||
|
zebezt
185 Posts
EBWOP Assume JSL's story is true Why was Mocsta RB'ed night one? He was the one that saved Laguerta from being lynched on D1. Very unlikely choice. Yet another gap in the story. | ||
|
Trotske
410 Posts
Combined with his previous scummy behavior my vote is not changing and I urge everyone else to vote JSL. | ||
|
JacobStrangelove
Australia1572 Posts
| ||
| ||
