• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 07:36
CEST 13:36
KST 20:36
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL22] Ro4 Preview: Mirror Mirror6[ASL22] Ro8 Preview: Within Reach5[ASL22] Ro8 Preview: In A Tizzy11[ASL22] Ro16 Preview: Holy Diver5[ASL22] Ro16 Preview: Rough Waters10
Community News
Weekly Cups (October 5-11): Farewell to 5.0.162Rollback Netcode in Brood War1135.0.17 Patch Notes - October 7, 202624Weekly Cups Results (Sep 28-Oct 4)0SC4ALL: II SC2 Complete Invited Player Lineup10
StarCraft 2
General
Team Liquid Map Contest #22: Results and Winners SCII needs to put more weight on strategy and tact How do you feel about the mass reverts in the 5.0.17 PTR? Server Blocker Stellar Fest 2 Replay Pack
Tourneys
Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament Master Swan Open (Global Bronze-Master 2) $3,500 WardiTV Not-Summer Championship Stellar Fest TWO the Moon (Dec 16-20) ISSL (IntoTheTV x SOOP SC2 League): Premier
Strategy
[H] ZvP Mid-Late Game: Stalkers Collossi HT
Custom Maps
[G] How to playtest arcade maps [A] Nemrods 1/4 players [M] (2) Sweltering Sands [M] (2) Frigid Storage
External Content
The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 547 Temple Of Terror Mutation # 546 Catch the Train Mutation # 545 And Drops and Rifts
Brood War
General
[Megathread] Daily Funny Videos Rollback Netcode in Brood War Bot on ladder BW General Discussion Sagi.gg Launcher Released
Tourneys
ASL 22 Finals 2v2v2v2 Tournament Small VOD Thread 2.0 [Women's StarCraft] MonstarZ vs Dreams 2026-10-15
Strategy
Cliff Jump Revisited (1 in a 1000 strategy) Simple Questions, Simple Answers Replay Review Process - What do you do?
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Dawn of War IV General RTS Discussion Thread Warcraft III: The Frozen Throne
Dota 2
Dota 2 Champions League Season 3 Begins April 25!
League of Legends
[TL LoL EUW IHs] Teemo shall perish
Heroes of the Storm
Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread The Chess Thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Artificial Intelligence Thread
Fan Clubs
Serral Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece Movie Discussion! Diablo Animated Series on Netflix
Sports
MLB/Baseball 2023 Football (Soccer) Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
Recent Gifted Posts
Blogs
The Link Between Gaming and …
TrAiDoS
[ASL22] Ro4 Day1 Ticket Giv…
bITt.mAN
38 yo Retired SWE loo…
PurE)Rabbit-SF
Can Bots Beat Pros?? Starcr…
namkraft
[meme] I finally understa…
LUCKY_NOOB
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 9173 users

APM measurements changes in 1.4.0 - Page 27

Forum Index > SC2 General
Post a Reply
Prev 1 25 26 27 28 29 42 Next All
densha
Profile Joined December 2010
United States797 Posts
September 21 2011 01:36 GMT
#521
On September 21 2011 10:01 genius_man16 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 21 2011 09:22 Supert0fu wrote:
If you click a lot the game will think that you are doing a lot of useful actions when in fact spam clicking is probably one of the most useless spam strategies. I don't know why people are so happy about this, being able to move a scout to going to back to your base to produce units is one of the most important skills to have but it is just considered to be worthless compared to clicking a zergling to move to the same place 80 times


This is my problem with it. So now a major part of macro, the "tapping" aspect isn't useful APM? Since when is Blizzard the one to judge something like that?

I feel like when someone in Master or GM league has the same APM as someone in silver something is wrong.

Spam clicking is stupid/pointless/useless, whereas hotkey spam actually has some meaning.

Edit: went from 150-160 APM to about 70 now -_- how dare I tap so much I guess.


Um, you still gain the benefits of tapping, why does it matter so much whether it counts as APM or not? The new way of recording APM may be more useful to determine who does more in the same amount of time on average.
If you wish to make an apple pie from scratch, you must first invent the universe.
Br3ezy
Profile Blog Joined September 2010
United States720 Posts
September 21 2011 01:41 GMT
#522
i honestly cant take apm seriously anymore in sc2 replays. At least sc2gears is still accurate
Check out my guide to mechanics http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=319876
trias_e
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
United States520 Posts
September 21 2011 01:42 GMT
#523
For me it's just annoying that if I play a game that last 10 minutes my APM is 90, if I play a game that lasts 30 minutes its 130.
usethis2
Profile Joined December 2010
2164 Posts
September 21 2011 01:49 GMT
#524
On September 21 2011 10:28 sechkie wrote:
someone was interested, so i'll post my own.
midmaster protoss
prepatch: 120
postpatch: 100ish (smaller sample, so give or take)

I think this is good that I have a small drop? I think?

That's pretty good. Mine went from 150-ish to 100-ish. Protoss here as well. At the beginning of the game it's 70~80 more or less.
RobRoy2501
Profile Blog Joined June 2008
United States177 Posts
September 21 2011 05:01 GMT
#525
Honestly, I would rather have subsequent move commands taken out, or at least taken out as well. I think that is one of the major APM "buffs" for low level players. Certainly there is some micro that it measures, but rarely is multiple MOVE COMMANDS in a row to the same unit a real measure of skill. Now if you throw some stops/holds/attacks in between I'm all for that, but someone selecting a unit and moving it by clicking the destination 5 times or just spamming destinations still gets a pretty inaccurate reading of their APM. While tapping, on the other hand is fairly useful, despite the early game meaningless spamming.

Realistically though, who cares its APM.
The mind is not a vessel to be filled, but a fire to be kindled. -Plutarch
ktimekiller
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
United States690 Posts
September 21 2011 05:18 GMT
#526
A zerg

pre: 200
post: 140
tuho12345
Profile Blog Joined July 2011
4482 Posts
September 21 2011 05:19 GMT
#527
My APM doesn't change much, I guess I don't spam really much.
PressureTested
Profile Joined June 2003
Australia83 Posts
September 21 2011 05:25 GMT
#528
On August 28 2011 16:31 Klyberess wrote:
So now the "Actions" only mean some of the actions, and the "Minute" isn't even real minutes.

.

I guess the "Per" still applies.


Summerised perfectly haha!

I only really ever used sc2gears for apm details anyway, but that hasn't caught up on the patch yet.
You can't teach that
Plexa
Profile Blog Joined October 2005
Aotearoa39261 Posts
September 21 2011 05:29 GMT
#529
On September 21 2011 07:30 youngminii wrote:
pre1.4 i had 200-250 in game apm
post1.4 i have 130-170 apm

after watching the replay, i've noticed that the biggest cause of the drop is that in the first 5-8 minutes, you're not really doing anything besides tapping so your apm is pathetic
after that initial 'doing nothing' period, your apm reflects pre1.4 apm again (except a tiny bit lower obviously)
if they got rid of apm for the first 5 minutes and calculated the average based on everything after, you'd have apm similar to your pre1.4 apm

so basically, this change is fucking stupid and blizzard has no idea on what they're doing for many things
Man speaks truth!
The whole point behind spamming pre-midgame is that it helps keep your rhythm up entering the midgame.
Administrator~ Spirit will set you free ~
Dakota_Fanning *
Profile Joined January 2008
Hungary2371 Posts
September 21 2011 08:48 GMT
#530
On September 21 2011 14:25 PressureTested wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 28 2011 16:31 Klyberess wrote:
So now the "Actions" only mean some of the actions, and the "Minute" isn't even real minutes.

.

I guess the "Per" still applies.


Summerised perfectly haha!

I only really ever used sc2gears for apm details anyway, but that hasn't caught up on the patch yet.

Sc2gears 8.0 has been released which adds support for 1.4 replays.
https://repmastered.icza.net
Nayl
Profile Joined March 2010
Canada413 Posts
September 21 2011 08:58 GMT
#531
Blizzard APM is now a completely worthless number. Before you could look at how fast someone was playing or see if your own hand speed has increased or not. Now it doesn't give me any real information.
Kiyo.
Profile Joined November 2010
United States2284 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-09-22 14:54:57
September 21 2011 09:01 GMT
#532
On September 21 2011 14:29 Plexa wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 21 2011 07:30 youngminii wrote:
pre1.4 i had 200-250 in game apm
post1.4 i have 130-170 apm

after watching the replay, i've noticed that the biggest cause of the drop is that in the first 5-8 minutes, you're not really doing anything besides tapping so your apm is pathetic
after that initial 'doing nothing' period, your apm reflects pre1.4 apm again (except a tiny bit lower obviously)
if they got rid of apm for the first 5 minutes and calculated the average based on everything after, you'd have apm similar to your pre1.4 apm

so basically, this change is fucking stupid and blizzard has no idea on what they're doing for many things
Man speaks truth!
The whole point behind spamming pre-midgame is that it helps keep your rhythm up entering the midgame.


And is there some magical mechanic that is preventing you from spamming pre-midgame now?

Effective apm is a much better tool to compare players with, as it shows actual useful commands, not spam.
KT Rolster & StarTale <3 | twitter.com/RayFoxII - twitch.tv/RayFoxII
Alpino
Profile Joined June 2011
Brazil4390 Posts
September 21 2011 09:06 GMT
#533
Wtf change. Waste your time on something useful blizz.
20/11/2015 - never forget EE's Ember
ETisME
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
12891 Posts
September 21 2011 09:09 GMT
#534
mine was 100 average to 90 average, guess nothing changed that much :p
其疾如风,其徐如林,侵掠如火,不动如山,难知如阴,动如雷震。
S2Lunar
Profile Joined June 2011
1051 Posts
September 21 2011 09:11 GMT
#535
On September 21 2011 18:06 Alpino wrote:
Wtf change. Waste your time on something useful blizz.


Don't be a idiot.

This is a positive change... they don't "waste" their time on any changes.
Okiesmokie
Profile Joined May 2010
Canada379 Posts
September 21 2011 09:11 GMT
#536
On September 21 2011 18:01 Kiyo. wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 21 2011 14:29 Plexa wrote:
On September 21 2011 07:30 youngminii wrote:
pre1.4 i had 200-250 in game apm
post1.4 i have 130-170 apm

after watching the replay, i've noticed that the biggest cause of the drop is that in the first 5-8 minutes, you're not really doing anything besides tapping so your apm is pathetic
after that initial 'doing nothing' period, your apm reflects pre1.4 apm again (except a tiny bit lower obviously)
if they got rid of apm for the first 5 minutes and calculated the average based on everything after, you'd have apm similar to your pre1.4 apm

so basically, this change is fucking stupid and blizzard has no idea on what they're doing for many things
Man speaks truth!
The whole point behind spamming pre-midgame is that it helps keep your rhythm up entering the midgame.


And is there some magical mechanic that is preventing you from not spamming pre-midgame now?

Effective apm is a much better tool to compare players with, as it shows actual useful commands, not spam.

Checking buildings to see the time on upgrades/if units need to be built is pretty useful.
Vamp
Profile Joined June 2008
United Kingdom184 Posts
September 21 2011 09:30 GMT
#537
Apm should of been measured like this in the first place.

Spamming the same numbers over and over does nothing.
`';..;'` http://www.facebook.com/Vamp.Sc2
Monkeyballs25
Profile Joined October 2010
531 Posts
September 21 2011 09:44 GMT
#538
I'm not that bothered about the change really. I do think its pointless trying to eliminate "spammy" useless APM from the measurement, because as people have said here you can just replace it with excessive move commands. As always, higher APM could mean that you're better, or that you're better at spamming.
IMBAkorean
Profile Joined October 2010
Canada835 Posts
September 21 2011 09:45 GMT
#539
so.....they made it so spam doesn't count? lol doesn't really change much other than spamkids can't talk trash about their "high" apm ?
RATDOTO
iblink
Profile Joined September 2011
Netherlands36 Posts
September 21 2011 10:18 GMT
#540
On September 21 2011 18:11 Toppp wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 21 2011 18:06 Alpino wrote:
Wtf change. Waste your time on something useful blizz.


Don't be a idiot.

This is a positive change... they don't "waste" their time on any changes.


No it's not, it's one of the worst changes made by Blizz. Like it wasn't enough that they haven't given us the real APM in the first place; now they implement that stupid change whose only goal is to tap noobs in the back.

What was the problem with pre 1.4 APM anyway? Have you seen anyone ever complain about apm spammers fe? Merz has 500 APM, did anyone care? Did anyone consider him better than MVP or Bomber who were in the same tournament? Of course not, no one cared. But this change is god awful imo and highly unnecessary. APM should be displayed the way it is, raw clean and untouched.
just do it
Prev 1 25 26 27 28 29 42 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
WardiTV Invitational
20:00
WardiTV Not-Summer Championshi
IntoTheiNu 437
WardiTV324
OGKoka 177
TKL 122
LamboSC260
Liquipedia
Online Event
20:00
BamsPatch 1.0 Weekly #4
SHIN 11
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
ByuN 206
OGKoka 177
TKL 122
LamboSC2 60
SHIN 11
StarCraft: Brood War
Calm 7435
Bisu 1231
FanTaSy 693
Jaedong 440
Horang2 429
Larva 428
BeSt 312
actioN 281
Stork 266
Zeus 163
[ Show more ]
Hyuk 157
ZerO 147
Dewaltoss 145
EffOrt 113
Snow 111
Light 108
ggaemo 105
Leta 104
Barracks 79
Mind 75
Hyun 74
Killer 71
Free 57
Pusan 57
910 40
ToSsGirL 30
Sharp 30
Shinee 29
Bishop 27
hero 27
soO 25
ajuk12(nOOB) 21
Hm[arnc] 21
Bale 20
sorry 15
sSak 13
Noble 12
zelot 12
Terrorterran 4
Dota 2
canceldota3
Counter-Strike
shoxiejesuss1605
olofmeister1345
kennyS912
kRYSTAL_22
Other Games
gofns30691
singsing1797
Coldzera 750
B2W.Neo694
Lowko217
Pyrionflax215
ZerO(Twitch)7
BEARDiaguz4
DeMusliM0
Organizations
StarCraft: Brood War
UltimateBattle 11
lovetv 5
[ Show 10 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• LUISG 22
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• Migwel
StarCraft: Brood War
• ChaeLyn 4
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Upcoming Events
Korean StarCraft League
15h 24m
Afreeca Starleague
18h 24m
Rush vs Soulkey
CranKy Ducklings
22h 24m
WardiTV Invitational
23h 24m
AI Arena Tournament
1d 4h
BSL Open Qualifier
1d 7h
Sparkling Tuna Cup
1d 22h
OSC
2 days
IPSL
2 days
BSL Open Qualifier
2 days
[ Show More ]
WardiTV Weekly
2 days
IntoTheTV X SOOP
3 days
PiGosaur Cup
4 days
The PondCast
4 days
Kung Fu Cup
4 days
IntoTheTV X SOOP
5 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Super Anchor Qualifying S3
Blizzard Classic Cup 2026
Copium Cup

Ongoing

ASL Season 22
Acropolis #5
KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 4
HCC Season 3
Thunderpick World Champ. '26
ESL Pro League Season 24
Stake Ranked Episode 4
1win Private Club #1
Logitech G Play Connect 2026
SL StarSeries Fall 2026
FISSURE Playground #3
BLAST Open Fall 2026
Esports World Cup 2026

Upcoming

Acropolis #5 - GSC
BSL Season 23
SC4ALL II: Brood War
BSL 23: Non-Korean Championship
HSC XXX
Stellar Fest 2: Lunar Cup
SC4ALL II: StarCraft II
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
RSL Offline Finals
eXTREMESLAND 2026
PGL Major Singapore 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 6
BLAST Rivals Fall 2026
IEM Beijing 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 5
PGL Masters Bucharest 2026
1win Private Club #2
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.