I do maintain 90-100 no problem nowadays, but it's pretty much a cap for me. I also feel like I'm clicking insanely fast on 100 APM =p
Physical APM Cap? - Page 3
Forum Index > SC2 General |
Talin
Montenegro10532 Posts
I do maintain 90-100 no problem nowadays, but it's pretty much a cap for me. I also feel like I'm clicking insanely fast on 100 APM =p | ||
Tin_Foil
United States243 Posts
| ||
TheGiftedApe
United States1243 Posts
| ||
TibblesEvilCat
United Kingdom766 Posts
| ||
wishbones
Canada2600 Posts
myself personally, 100-150 apm, and i play maybe once a day. its just the way it is when you've practice enough, your hands never forget how to move. also keep in mind guitar hero, those guys are nuts, but simply because they practiced enough. + Show Spoiler [not a famous guitar player, but fast!] + | ||
oogles
United States29 Posts
You can do anything you put your mind to. The people who succeed in Starcraft, and in most things, are people who say "That person can do X, there is no reason I can't do it." People who blame it on it being "physically impossible" for them to do so are creating a self-fulfilling prophecy. I don't think having 200 APM is a necessity to play well, but if you really want to play with high APM, then just do it. Play and practice and focus on doing it and you will. | ||
ducis
Canada96 Posts
A marathon would literally kill someone who is ill prepared, yet their are lots of ultramararthoners who can do 160k (almost 4x marathon distance) at incredible speeds. likewise, we wont know about an apm cap until we've had people playing starcraft from birth for 10 years 10 hours a day ![]() | ||
Stane
United States64 Posts
| ||
flodeskum
Iceland1267 Posts
On November 30 2010 09:05 indigoawareness wrote: I can't seem to get much over 250 even straight spamming but then again maybe I'm special. I also wonder what's the absolute minimum apms needed. For the first few mins it must really not be more then 10. I do enjoy putting 200 apms of effort into making the critcal first pylon though. And what a pylon that must be. | ||
Ezze
Canada934 Posts
On November 30 2010 10:40 Mooncat wrote: This is pretty interesting. Most responses to this thread so far are like "200APM no problem yo!". Are you actually good at SC2? Because then you'd pretty much be the prime example of what I was talking about earlier. A player who is very good but will always be limited by his rather low APM, thus never being able to reach pro level physically. Btw. are we talking about 80 real APM here, or 80APM displayed in the SC2 APM Tab which would translate to about 120 actual APM? I'm not very good by anyone's standards. I'm sitting at about 1900pts 52% win rate, and about 1000 1v1 games. My SC2 displayed APM is about 60 so I figured that was about 80 actual APM. Like I said earlier, I have tried pretty hard to increase it, but I just can't. It's not a mind limitation either, I can think of several things to do, just can't actually execute them as fast physically. Over the years, I have probably played over 300 games just for APM practice, spamming as HARD as I could, and the best I ever got for a 10+ min game was about 110 actual APM, but my play actually suffered as most of it was just useless spamming. I honestly don't get how anyone can have 200+ APM in terms of useful actions. It seems impossible. | ||
Vi)Chris
United States700 Posts
| ||
uhohstd
United States9 Posts
| ||
kefif
Poland264 Posts
On January 09 2011 02:07 uhohstd wrote: hmmmm well i think i got some nasty fingers, 912 apm, picture proof http://screenshot.xfire.com/s/109254718-4.jpg i got the replay still and i will do it again for the non believers. and? Do you think that spamming to get high apm is hard? It is about effective apm during the game not about silly spamming. But you made me to do it: + Show Spoiler + ![]() | ||
SnuggleZhenya
596 Posts
| ||
BuuGhost
Netherlands340 Posts
While the other guy may have needed 500 games played plus alot of practise games to gain that number. besides APM spamming is childsplay, trying to put it to good use is the hard part. | ||
ALPINA
3791 Posts
Well I disagree. If I know all actions I need to make in next 10 seconds, for example, inject bases, build evo chamber, build units and spead creep, I still can't do that very fast and my precision is not that good. If you watch pro players they just click and build everything much faster and their precision is much better. I can't even click on minimap precise and fast.. If you order to make 10 actions in a row to regular player and same action for pro, then pro will make them much faster. | ||
wxwx
527 Posts
It shouldn't be used as a standard! It's just too easy to fake/abuse. I can easily click 4 times for each move command and reach 400apm, but I'm actually playing worse than when I'm playing at 150. Also it's skewed in that it's the average over the entire game. A person can have 300 apm at the start of the game spamming but then when it comes to the part where apm really counts (army battles/multiple drops) then drops to 50. On the other hand, a passive player who doesn't need to do much to keep perfect macro can have 100 the whole game, but spike at 400 when his actions are really needed. So don't use apm as a benchmark for success. It's too vague: just look at your games and pinpoint your weaknesses. Is your scout always dying? Your multitasking needs to improve. Not knowing your army is engaging until too late? You have to work on your awareness. | ||
RoosterSamurai
Japan2108 Posts
| ||
playa
United States1284 Posts
I'd like to hear about APM training and how some players got theirs over something like 220. It would be nice to have a high real APM; not the APM that most people have in the first 2 minutes when they are using 10000 clicks to accomplish the same thing you do in 1. | ||
JayConn
United States408 Posts
| ||
| ||