• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 02:00
CEST 08:00
KST 15:00
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
RSL Season 1 - Final Week6[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall15HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16Code S RO4 & Finals Preview: herO, Rogue, Classic, GuMiho0
Community News
Esports World Cup 2025 - Brackets Revealed18Weekly Cups (July 7-13): Classic continues to roll8Team TLMC #5 - Submission extension3Firefly given lifetime ban by ESIC following match-fixing investigation17$25,000 Streamerzone StarCraft Pro Series announced7
StarCraft 2
General
Who will win EWC 2025? Heaven's Balance Suggestions (roast me) The Memories We Share - Facing the Final(?) GSL Esports World Cup 2025 - Brackets Revealed RSL Revival patreon money discussion thread
Tourneys
Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond) FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series $5,100+ SEL Season 2 Championship (SC: Evo)
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation # 482 Wheel of Misfortune Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava Mutation # 480 Moths to the Flame Mutation # 479 Worn Out Welcome
Brood War
General
BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Flash Announces (and Retracts) Hiatus From ASL Soulkey Muta Micro Map? BW General Discussion [ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues 2025 ACS Season 2 Qualifier [BSL 2v2] ProLeague Season 3 - Friday 21:00 CET CSL Xiamen International Invitational
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Path of Exile Nintendo Switch Thread CCLP - Command & Conquer League Project The PlayStation 5
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
The Games Industry And ATVI Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Movie Discussion! Anime Discussion Thread [Manga] One Piece Korean Music Discussion [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NBA General Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Ping To Win? Pings And Their…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 619 users

Physical APM Cap?

Forum Index > SC2 General
Post a Reply
1 2 3 4 5 7 8 9 Next All
Mooncat
Profile Joined October 2007
Germany1228 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-11-30 00:20:26
November 30 2010 00:00 GMT
#1
Hey there,

recently I've been thinking about APM, and by that I mean the actual APM that you do sensible stuff with, not max spamming, multi-clicking or whatever.

Pretty much everyone agrees that you don't need an insane amount of APM to be successful at SC2, but 150-200 APM seems to be a reasonable 'needed' amount to play at pro level. However, one particular question came up.

Is it physically impossible for some people to reach said amount of APM? Of course it is impossible for disabled people, mouse only players, etc. but I'm talking about the average guy here. Two healthy arms, one healthy brain, everything in the right place to play SC2.

What do you guys think? Does every player have his personal APM limit that might very well lie below ~200 or do you think that everybody should be able to reach 200APM with enough practice?

I'm really interested in hearing your thoughts about his.



Some stuff to clarify: I am not APM obsessed by any means, nor do I worry about my personal current or future APM. I'm also well aware that you can hardly force high APM. APM are something that comes naturally the more you play. I'm just curious if it is physically impossible to play at pro level for some people while they would be perfectly capable of doing so mentally.


Poll: Do you think everyone is physically capable of breaking 200 APM?

There might be some people who can't physically reach 200APM, but the average guy should be able to (421)
 
50%

Yes, everyone should be able to break 200(USEFUL!!!) APM physically. (226)
 
27%

No, I think many people have their personal APM cap way below 200APM. (197)
 
23%

844 total votes

Your vote: Do you think everyone is physically capable of breaking 200 APM?

(Vote): Yes, everyone should be able to break 200(USEFUL!!!) APM physically.
(Vote): No, I think many people have their personal APM cap way below 200APM.
(Vote): There might be some people who can't physically reach 200APM, but the average guy should be able to

"[Lee Young Ho] With this victory, you’ve risen to Bonjwa status."
shindigs
Profile Blog Joined May 2009
United States4795 Posts
November 30 2010 00:03 GMT
#2
As you get older, your speed decreases a bit so I do believe there is an eventual physical APM cap. Of course this can vary person to person, but I've heard from some people that BoxeR technically plays pretty slow since he's pushing his 30's.

I personally have had no experience with it since I'm still youthful =P
Photographer@shindags || twitch.tv/shindigs
azhang
Profile Joined June 2010
United States178 Posts
November 30 2010 00:03 GMT
#3
It's definitely capable physically for any healthy starcraft player, but where it really matters is if he is just button-mashing, or putting it to good use
Nydus in yo main.
Hypatio
Profile Joined September 2010
549 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-11-30 00:05:33
November 30 2010 00:04 GMT
#4
It could depend on how you define an action. In normal play, I average 100-170 APM over the game, according to replays, and peak at no more than 400 or so when in a frantic production or battle mode.

However, I've also noticed that using the stop+F1 drone dispersal technique you can EASILY see 1000 APM and watching one replay I got to 2000 APM. I can only assume that pressing F1 when many drones are idle incorporates a number of actions that the computer does for you.
Irrelevant
Profile Blog Joined June 2009
United States2364 Posts
November 30 2010 00:05 GMT
#5
Physically yes.

However even with 200apm you could be doing it wrong or just spamming less than optimal moments to keep up the speed.
Chronopolis
Profile Joined April 2009
Canada1484 Posts
November 30 2010 00:05 GMT
#6
It would actually be quite interesting (fucking crazy, but still interesting) if a player could abuse apm. Just because they can physically play faster than thier opponent eg. they know the player can only manage 5 drops, so they they drop in 6 places at once
indigoawareness
Profile Joined October 2010
Slovakia273 Posts
November 30 2010 00:05 GMT
#7
I can't seem to get much over 250 even straight spamming but then again maybe I'm special. I also wonder what's the absolute minimum apms needed. For the first few mins it must really not be more then 10. I do enjoy putting 200 apms of effort into making the critcal first pylon though.
To sleep, perchance to dream.
Enervate
Profile Joined August 2010
United States1769 Posts
November 30 2010 00:08 GMT
#8
In my opinion, it's just like being talented at sports. Obviously practice makes you better, but some people are naturally talented. For SC2, it is not physically impossible to play at pro level because relatively low apm is needed. There are plenty of very good players with fairly low apm. 150 apm is easily achievable with practice. There's definitely different apm limits for everyone though, and this is were natural talent plays in.
gurrpp
Profile Blog Joined October 2009
United States437 Posts
November 30 2010 00:08 GMT
#9
Physically, its definitely possible. Obviously anyone can spam that high. I know some guys in my college who can spam 700 apm + at the beginning of the match. Can everyone put 200+ apm to good use? Then you're asking more about the mental aspect. I think with enough training, anyone can easily break 200 useful apm. Its simply a matter of knowing what to do.
hot fuh days
Logo
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
United States7542 Posts
November 30 2010 00:09 GMT
#10
Well it takes practice to get your muscles built up in your hand. It's not like you can sit down at a computer for your very first time and type at 70WPM. APM in SC2 is no different.

200 APM really isn't all that much so it's not very likely to be a physical limitation of many players unless they have a medical condition (including, but not limited to, missing limbs) or are very old. I'd be willing to bet that almost anyone can hit 200 APM spamming 123 or 5sd using 3 fingers after just a little bit of time doing it. Meanwhile that's ignoring your whole other hand. Honestly, your mouse hand is probably the bigger bottle neck to APM than anything else and really the mouse isn't that demanding for speed, it just requires the appropriate muscle memory to move it accurately at a quick pace.
Logo
Powster
Profile Joined April 2010
United States650 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-11-30 00:11:37
November 30 2010 00:10 GMT
#11
200 apm doesnt seem that high... I am sure if I tried I could get to 200 apm in a month. I believe you can force your APM.. I have done it many times. I forced myself to play faster and at first it was kinda sloppy but when you keep doing it you will speed up and your average APM will rise. Maybe I can do that though because I used to play gunz at 600 APM.. so just like 100-150 apm is really slow to me just I havent played enough to know what I need to do at all times automatically.. Really late into a game when theres not much thinking needed though my APM rises a lot which is why I win late game 95% of the time since people slow down at the point while my APM rises every minute..

Personally I think 300-350ish will be a good amount to be having crazy micro and macroing at the same time.. but dunno because I am obviously not close to being there lol..
Mooncat
Profile Joined October 2007
Germany1228 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-11-30 00:16:21
November 30 2010 00:11 GMT
#12
On November 30 2010 09:04 Hypatio wrote:
It could depend on how you define an action. In normal play, I average 100-170 APM over the game and peak at no more than 400 or so when in a frantic production or battle mode.

However, I've also noticed that using the stop+F1 drone dispersal technique you can EASILY see 1000 APM and watching one replay I got to 2000 APM. I can only assume that pressing F1 when many drones are idle incorporates a number of actions that the computer does for you.


As I said, I'm talking about sensible APM here. No mashing, no "bugs", no abuse, etc. Just clean, real actions that make sense in some way.

To make a rather extreme example: Let's imagine a guy that just cannot do more than 50 actions per minute physically. It's just impossible for him. But inside the borders of those 50 APM he's physically capable of, he does everything perfectly. Obviously this guy is gonna be a very good player, as 50 perfect actions are more than enough to beat most people. However, he will never be able to beat someone with ~200APM even if that guy is slightly less perfect in his 'APM usage'. That's how my question comes up.

To clarify things a bit, I think I will add a poll to the original thread.

Edit: Spelling
"[Lee Young Ho] With this victory, you’ve risen to Bonjwa status."
Mooncat
Profile Joined October 2007
Germany1228 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-11-30 00:13:42
November 30 2010 00:13 GMT
#13
Sry, accidental double post.

"[Lee Young Ho] With this victory, you’ve risen to Bonjwa status."
Stenstyren
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
Sweden619 Posts
November 30 2010 00:23 GMT
#14
There is of course a limit to how much data your brain can handle at the same time, we can say that you as a human have a limited amount of RAM.

Now, let's say that all humans have 1G ram. 600mb of that is spent on background processes, you know, MSN (social stuff), explorer (important body stuff) etc.

Now, this gives us 400mb of ram to utilize for SC2. What we want to do is to index SC2 into our brain so that searching for files goes faster, just like the first virus search always take ages while the following ones are quite quick.

Now your brain have indexed that probes are made with "e" and terrans do stupid pushes around the 7 minute mark. That takes 50mb to uphold.

So, having indexed SC2 perfectly and shut down as many background processes as possible you can now start playing.

Every click you do uses up a small bit of your ram. Eventually your ram will run out. However, it's very hard to say at exactly which number of apm you will reach that limit since so many factors play in. How well is the game indexed? Are my background processes using up unnecessary memory? Is my brain infected with malicious software?

Yes, there is a cap, but that cap is at how many actions you could do if you could utilize the full 1G potential of your brain, thus eliminating all the memory hogs. The more memory you cut from other things, the more apm you can do.


Lol, this went too far
What I'm trying to say is that there is a cap but that cap is unreachable since you will ALWAYS be able to be just a bit more focused and just a tad more alert.

However, I do think think that the realistic cap varies from human to human, i would say that all normal functioning humans can get to 200 apm with enough practice and dedication, I'm not so sure that everyone could get to 300 or 350 though.
ZoW
Profile Blog Joined January 2009
United States3983 Posts
November 30 2010 00:24 GMT
#15
afaik the known record in a televised game is held by Julyzerg at 818 peak apm.

[image loading].
the courage to be a lazy bum
Hypatio
Profile Joined September 2010
549 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-11-30 00:26:49
November 30 2010 00:25 GMT
#16
On November 30 2010 09:11 Mooncat wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 30 2010 09:04 Hypatio wrote:
It could depend on how you define an action. In normal play, I average 100-170 APM over the game and peak at no more than 400 or so when in a frantic production or battle mode.

However, I've also noticed that using the stop+F1 drone dispersal technique you can EASILY see 1000 APM and watching one replay I got to 2000 APM. I can only assume that pressing F1 when many drones are idle incorporates a number of actions that the computer does for you.


As I said, I'm talking about sensible APM here. No mashing, no "bugs", no abuse, etc. Just clean, real actions that make sense in some way.

To make a rather extreme example: Let's imagine a guy that just cannot do more than 50 actions per minute physically. It's just impossible for him. But inside the borders of those 50 APM he's physically capable of, he does everything perfectly. Obviously this guy is gonna be a very good player, as 50 perfect actions are more than enough to beat most people. However, he will never be able to beat someone with ~200APM even if that guy is slightly less perfect in his 'APM usage'. That's how my question comes up.

Edit: Spelling

It might be important to realize that APM spam is not always MERE spam. Firstly, it is healthy to use move/attack commands more than once and perhaps even at least three times in fast repetition simply because you may make a misclick which is corrected by subsequent commands. In addition, during the course of a command your opinion may change rapidly as new information comes by moving the window or surveying surroundings or the movements of your and enemy units.

This makes it quite difficult even to define what someones useful or effective apm is, because even the 'spam' is very often useful.
Mooncat
Profile Joined October 2007
Germany1228 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-11-30 00:31:35
November 30 2010 00:28 GMT
#17
On November 30 2010 09:23 Stenstyren wrote:
+ Show Spoiler +
There is of course a limit to how much data your brain can handle at the same time, we can say that you as a human have a limited amount of RAM.

Now, let's say that all humans have 1G ram. 600mb of that is spent on background processes, you know, MSN (social stuff), explorer (important body stuff) etc.

Now, this gives us 400mb of ram to utilize for SC2. What we want to do is to index SC2 into our brain so that searching for files goes faster, just like the first virus search always take ages while the following ones are quite quick.

Now your brain have indexed that probes are made with "e" and terrans do stupid pushes around the 7 minute mark. That takes 50mb to uphold.

So, having indexed SC2 perfectly and shut down as many background processes as possible you can now start playing.

Every click you do uses up a small bit of your ram. Eventually your ram will run out. However, it's very hard to say at exactly which number of apm you will reach that limit since so many factors play in. How well is the game indexed? Are my background processes using up unnecessary memory? Is my brain infected with malicious software?

Yes, there is a cap, but that cap is at how many actions you could do if you could utilize the full 1G potential of your brain, thus eliminating all the memory hogs. The more memory you cut from other things, the more apm you can do.



Lol, this went too far
What I'm trying to say is that there is a cap but that cap is unreachable since you will ALWAYS be able to be just a bit more focused and just a tad more alert.

However, I do think think that the realistic cap varies from human to human, i would say that all normal functioning humans can get to 200 apm with enough practice and dedication, I'm not so sure that everyone could get to 300 or 350 though.


Thank you! That was the kind of answer I was looking for The last two paragraphs at the very least...

On November 30 2010 09:25 Hypatio wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 30 2010 09:11 Mooncat wrote:
On November 30 2010 09:04 Hypatio wrote:
It could depend on how you define an action. In normal play, I average 100-170 APM over the game and peak at no more than 400 or so when in a frantic production or battle mode.

However, I've also noticed that using the stop+F1 drone dispersal technique you can EASILY see 1000 APM and watching one replay I got to 2000 APM. I can only assume that pressing F1 when many drones are idle incorporates a number of actions that the computer does for you.


As I said, I'm talking about sensible APM here. No mashing, no "bugs", no abuse, etc. Just clean, real actions that make sense in some way.

To make a rather extreme example: Let's imagine a guy that just cannot do more than 50 actions per minute physically. It's just impossible for him. But inside the borders of those 50 APM he's physically capable of, he does everything perfectly. Obviously this guy is gonna be a very good player, as 50 perfect actions are more than enough to beat most people. However, he will never be able to beat someone with ~200APM even if that guy is slightly less perfect in his 'APM usage'. That's how my question comes up.

Edit: Spelling

It might be important to realize that APM spam is not always MERE spam. Firstly, it is healthy to use move/attack commands more than once and perhaps even at least three times in fast repetition simply because you may make a misclick which is corrected by subsequent commands. In addition, during the course of a command your opinion may change rapidly as new information comes by moving the window or surveying surroundings or the movements of your and enemy units.

This makes it quite difficult even to define what someones useful or effective apm is, because even the 'spam' is very often useful.


I do realize that 'useful' APM is rather difficult to define, but you know what I mean right? ;>
It's not that important to have an exact definition of the term 'useful APM' to answer my question, you just have to roughly know what I'm talking about.

"[Lee Young Ho] With this victory, you’ve risen to Bonjwa status."
Sanasante
Profile Joined March 2010
United States321 Posts
November 30 2010 00:32 GMT
#18
APM is based on in game time. In game time is not the same as real time therefore APM is not actually accurate. Game time is roughly 1.5x normal time so someone with 150 APM is actually around 225 that we would have seen in Starcraft 1. Good note to have when doing this analysis.
It is during our darkest moments that we must focus to see the light
Archmage
Profile Joined November 2008
United States169 Posts
November 30 2010 00:34 GMT
#19
Anybody can button mash the keyboard for 1000+ APM if they felt like it. That means that the restriction on a person's APM isn't how fast his or her fingers move, but how fast his or her mind moves. I think that everyone is capable of this kind of APM given enough practice.
Homerclese
Profile Joined August 2010
Australia30 Posts
November 30 2010 00:39 GMT
#20
I think what most people will find that as your ability to multitask gets better, your APM will go with it.

I don't think it's a case of being able to reach 200apm, it's knowing why you need 200apm to begin with, and all that comes down to is practice, every normal person has the capacity to play with high apm, if your fingers can move that fast, you can play with high apm. For example, if I were to type out a random sequence of numbers and letters (4 dd 2 s 1 s 3 e 4 aa, something like that but longer) you would at first look at it and do it very slowly, but as you became more familar with it, you would do it so fast to the point where it's second nature, and it's the exact same as playing sc2, just interpretting what needs to be done and executing it quickly.

When I first started, I played at around 60, and thought, theres no way I'll ever get to play at a 200-300 apm range.

Now, it's just the norm for me. and that's after around 3 months.
When life gives you lemons ... Say F*** the lemons and bail.
1 2 3 4 5 7 8 9 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 4h
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 37652
PianO 497
Leta 273
Backho 37
ajuk12(nOOB) 18
Dota 2
ODPixel299
NeuroSwarm133
League of Legends
JimRising 763
Counter-Strike
Stewie2K1537
Other Games
summit1g13227
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick2305
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 15 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• practicex 61
• OhrlRock 8
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Rush2242
• HappyZerGling85
Other Games
• WagamamaTV100
Upcoming Events
Sparkling Tuna Cup
4h
Online Event
10h
BSL 2v2 ProLeague S3
12h
Esports World Cup
2 days
ByuN vs Astrea
Lambo vs HeRoMaRinE
Clem vs TBD
Solar vs Zoun
SHIN vs Reynor
Maru vs TriGGeR
herO vs Lancer
Cure vs ShoWTimE
Esports World Cup
3 days
Esports World Cup
4 days
Esports World Cup
5 days
CranKy Ducklings
6 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
6 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
6 days
Bonyth vs Sziky
Dewalt vs Hawk
Hawk vs QiaoGege
Sziky vs Dewalt
Mihu vs Bonyth
Zhanhun vs QiaoGege
QiaoGege vs Fengzi
Liquipedia Results

Completed

2025 ACS Season 2
RSL Revival: Season 1
Murky Cup #2

Ongoing

BSL 2v2 Season 3
Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
BSL20 Non-Korean Championship
CSL Xiamen Invitational
Championship of Russia 2025
Underdog Cup #2
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25

Upcoming

CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
BSL Season 21
RSL Revival: Season 2
SEL Season 2 Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
FEL Cracov 2025
Esports World Cup 2025
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.