LOL.
"Better deflower that Tyrell"
| Forum Index > Media & Entertainment |
All book discussion in this thread is now allowed. | ||
|
Grovbolle
Denmark3813 Posts
May 20 2013 09:02 GMT
#16981
On May 20 2013 18:01 Aelfric wrote: Show nested quote + On May 20 2013 17:59 Grovbolle wrote: On May 20 2013 17:56 GwSC wrote: On May 20 2013 17:54 Grovbolle wrote: Fucking Sam. "Better leave this awesome white-walker owning dagger of pure awesomeness and run from the FUCKING BIRDS." To be fair there were quite a few birds ![]() Still. Watching GoT makes you kind of a sadist, I wan't something bad to happen to him soon because he has had it coming for a long time. + Show Spoiler + ![]() LOL. "Better deflower that Tyrell" | ||
|
SkelA
Macedonia13069 Posts
May 20 2013 09:04 GMT
#16982
| ||
|
Yoav
United States1874 Posts
May 20 2013 09:07 GMT
#16983
On May 20 2013 16:37 Aelfric wrote: Show nested quote + On May 20 2013 16:06 Yoav wrote: On May 20 2013 15:51 albis wrote: dany + 2000men. needs a bit better guard detail though. True on the guards, but I hear Braavosi are slippery (see Syrio, Jaquen). I wouldn't give the Unsullied too hard a time. Most important than having 2000 men, Dany now has heavy cavalry. Added to her spearmen, dragons, and the light cavalry she's probably planning on acquiring from the Dothraki, she's looking at a very well balanced force. Smaller than the other Westerosi armies, but better trained and more cohesive. And remember that a smaller army is not always a disadvantage, particularly with the supply-line problems that plagued middle-age armies. An elite 10,000 man force might stand a good chance against 60,000 Lannisters who have to choose between staying near supply hubs or splitting into smaller hosts. Never mind the issues of discipline and morale. Methinks men are braver when dragons fight with them, rather than against them. Which is the bigger number, five or one ? On Military Numbers Lol. Except that she was wrong. She would have died that night had her enemies not fought amongst themselves. Numbers aren't everything, even in a siege situation like she faced, where they matter more. In pre-modern battles, relatively few men were actually killed while both forces are coherently fighting. Most of the battle casualties came during the rout, which is why motivated and disciplined forces were consistently able to beat forces multiples of their size. If you're tougher, they break first, and then they die en masse. Never mind that most casualties weren't battle casualties at all, but were deaths due to hunger, thirst, and disease. The great military leaders of the ancient world and middle ages weren't great because of "tactics" of any kind... they were great because they could both a) inspire loyalty b) keep troops fed, watered, and largely healthy Dany has those down. The Great Houses of Westeros, not so much. If she is defeated at this point, it will have to come from a mistake she makes... probably out of hubris. Edit: On Nudity On May 20 2013 18:02 jcroisdale wrote: Gymnophobia (from Greek γυμνός - gumnos, "naked"[1] and φόβος - phobos, "fear"[2]) is a fear (phobia) of nudity. Gymnophobics experience anxiety from nudity, even if they realize their fear is irrational. They may worry about seeing others naked or being seen naked, or both. Their fear may stem from a general anxiety about sexuality, from a fear that they are physically inferior, or from a fear that their nakedness leaves them exposed and unprotected. Guys don't worry the boobies won't hurt you. They might even make a scene better. Actually, for some of us, the issue is that the extremely imbalanced male/female ratio suggests that much of the nudity is very much a matter of titillation. Several nude scenes were obviously unecessary titilation aimed at the lowest common denominator. But GoT has also had quite a few examples of how powerful nudity can be: Danaerys' whole plotline can be framed with her nude scenes, representing humiliation (bro/Drogo), rebirth (from the pyre), and now near godhood (this ep). But let's not kid ourselves that nudity is just another element like feasting or banners or long walks. Like violence, nudity and sex and important and literarily powerful. Gratuitous violence for its own sake has no place in literature. The same is true of nudity and sex. They are tools, and when present needlessly, draw unhelpful attention to themselves. | ||
|
-Archangel-
Croatia7457 Posts
May 20 2013 09:08 GMT
#16984
| ||
|
armada[sb]
United States432 Posts
May 20 2013 09:10 GMT
#16985
| ||
|
Aelfric
Turkey1496 Posts
May 20 2013 09:11 GMT
#16986
On May 20 2013 18:07 Yoav wrote: Show nested quote + On May 20 2013 16:37 Aelfric wrote: On May 20 2013 16:06 Yoav wrote: On May 20 2013 15:51 albis wrote: dany + 2000men. needs a bit better guard detail though. True on the guards, but I hear Braavosi are slippery (see Syrio, Jaquen). I wouldn't give the Unsullied too hard a time. Most important than having 2000 men, Dany now has heavy cavalry. Added to her spearmen, dragons, and the light cavalry she's probably planning on acquiring from the Dothraki, she's looking at a very well balanced force. Smaller than the other Westerosi armies, but better trained and more cohesive. And remember that a smaller army is not always a disadvantage, particularly with the supply-line problems that plagued middle-age armies. An elite 10,000 man force might stand a good chance against 60,000 Lannisters who have to choose between staying near supply hubs or splitting into smaller hosts. Never mind the issues of discipline and morale. Methinks men are braver when dragons fight with them, rather than against them. Which is the bigger number, five or one ? Lol. Except that she was wrong. She would have died that night had her enemies not fought amongst themselves. Numbers aren't everything, even in a siege situation like she faced, where they matter more. In pre-modern battles, relatively few men were actually killed while both forces are coherently fighting. Most of the battle casualties came during the rout, which is why motivated and disciplined forces were consistently able to beat forces multiples of their size. If you're tougher, they break first, and then they die en masse. Never mind that most casualties weren't battle casualties at all, but were deaths due to hunger, thirst, and disease. The great military leaders of the ancient world and middle ages weren't great because of "tactics" of any kind... they were great because they could both a) inspire loyalty b) keep troops fed, watered, and largely healthy Dany has those down. The Great Houses of Westeros, not so much. If she is defeated at this point, it will have to come from a mistake she makes... probably out of hubris. You don't read much do you? User was warned for this post | ||
|
SergioCQH
United States143 Posts
May 20 2013 09:19 GMT
#16987
On May 20 2013 18:07 Yoav wrote: Show nested quote + On May 20 2013 16:37 Aelfric wrote: On May 20 2013 16:06 Yoav wrote: On May 20 2013 15:51 albis wrote: dany + 2000men. needs a bit better guard detail though. True on the guards, but I hear Braavosi are slippery (see Syrio, Jaquen). I wouldn't give the Unsullied too hard a time. Most important than having 2000 men, Dany now has heavy cavalry. Added to her spearmen, dragons, and the light cavalry she's probably planning on acquiring from the Dothraki, she's looking at a very well balanced force. Smaller than the other Westerosi armies, but better trained and more cohesive. And remember that a smaller army is not always a disadvantage, particularly with the supply-line problems that plagued middle-age armies. An elite 10,000 man force might stand a good chance against 60,000 Lannisters who have to choose between staying near supply hubs or splitting into smaller hosts. Never mind the issues of discipline and morale. Methinks men are braver when dragons fight with them, rather than against them. Which is the bigger number, five or one ? Lol. Except that she was wrong. She would have died that night had her enemies not fought amongst themselves. Numbers aren't everything, even in a siege situation like she faced, where they matter more. In pre-modern battles, relatively few men were actually killed while both forces are coherently fighting. Most of the battle casualties came during the rout, which is why motivated and disciplined forces were consistently able to beat forces multiples of their size. If you're tougher, they break first, and then they die en masse. Never mind that most casualties weren't battle casualties at all, but were deaths due to hunger, thirst, and disease. The great military leaders of the ancient world and middle ages weren't great because of "tactics" of any kind... they were great because they could both a) inspire loyalty b) keep troops fed, watered, and largely healthy Dany has those down. The Great Houses of Westeros, not so much. If she is defeated at this point, it will have to come from a mistake she makes... probably out of hubris. But tactics can play a large role in affecting troop morale. Enveloping the enemy like Hannibal did at Cannae can reduce their fighting strength. Great generals knew how to put their troops into positions where their fighting spirit would be high. | ||
|
Yoav
United States1874 Posts
May 20 2013 09:37 GMT
#16988
On May 20 2013 18:11 Aelfric wrote: Show nested quote + On May 20 2013 18:07 Yoav wrote: On May 20 2013 16:37 Aelfric wrote: On May 20 2013 16:06 Yoav wrote: On May 20 2013 15:51 albis wrote: dany + 2000men. needs a bit better guard detail though. True on the guards, but I hear Braavosi are slippery (see Syrio, Jaquen). I wouldn't give the Unsullied too hard a time. Most important than having 2000 men, Dany now has heavy cavalry. Added to her spearmen, dragons, and the light cavalry she's probably planning on acquiring from the Dothraki, she's looking at a very well balanced force. Smaller than the other Westerosi armies, but better trained and more cohesive. And remember that a smaller army is not always a disadvantage, particularly with the supply-line problems that plagued middle-age armies. An elite 10,000 man force might stand a good chance against 60,000 Lannisters who have to choose between staying near supply hubs or splitting into smaller hosts. Never mind the issues of discipline and morale. Methinks men are braver when dragons fight with them, rather than against them. Which is the bigger number, five or one ? Lol. Except that she was wrong. She would have died that night had her enemies not fought amongst themselves. Numbers aren't everything, even in a siege situation like she faced, where they matter more. In pre-modern battles, relatively few men were actually killed while both forces are coherently fighting. Most of the battle casualties came during the rout, which is why motivated and disciplined forces were consistently able to beat forces multiples of their size. If you're tougher, they break first, and then they die en masse. Never mind that most casualties weren't battle casualties at all, but were deaths due to hunger, thirst, and disease. The great military leaders of the ancient world and middle ages weren't great because of "tactics" of any kind... they were great because they could both a) inspire loyalty b) keep troops fed, watered, and largely healthy Dany has those down. The Great Houses of Westeros, not so much. If she is defeated at this point, it will have to come from a mistake she makes... probably out of hubris. You don't read much do you? Plenty, I assure you. But high fantasy often asks to be analyzed like history, rather than literature, so I try to oblige. For a literary view: Dany currently has a major plot riding on her, 4 major accessory characters (none of whom would have any purpose if she kicked it or lost her power), 2 entire cultures relevant only to her. All of this makes her unkillable/beatable for the time being. However, Martin is explicitly setting out to create a counterpoint to what he sees as more traditional high fantasy, and she is so much like a classic fantasy hero that her chances of ultimate victory are low. Furthermore, she has ascended from near-slavery to near-godhood, and her trajectory from here is unclear. To remain an interesting character, she will have to develop in one way or another, perhaps as a result of factionalism within her ranks. My guess is that she will be the season protagonist of next season. On May 20 2013 18:19 SergioCQH wrote: Show nested quote + On May 20 2013 18:07 Yoav wrote: On May 20 2013 16:37 Aelfric wrote: On May 20 2013 16:06 Yoav wrote: On May 20 2013 15:51 albis wrote: dany + 2000men. needs a bit better guard detail though. True on the guards, but I hear Braavosi are slippery (see Syrio, Jaquen). I wouldn't give the Unsullied too hard a time. Most important than having 2000 men, Dany now has heavy cavalry. Added to her spearmen, dragons, and the light cavalry she's probably planning on acquiring from the Dothraki, she's looking at a very well balanced force. Smaller than the other Westerosi armies, but better trained and more cohesive. And remember that a smaller army is not always a disadvantage, particularly with the supply-line problems that plagued middle-age armies. An elite 10,000 man force might stand a good chance against 60,000 Lannisters who have to choose between staying near supply hubs or splitting into smaller hosts. Never mind the issues of discipline and morale. Methinks men are braver when dragons fight with them, rather than against them. Which is the bigger number, five or one ? Lol. Except that she was wrong. She would have died that night had her enemies not fought amongst themselves. Numbers aren't everything, even in a siege situation like she faced, where they matter more. In pre-modern battles, relatively few men were actually killed while both forces are coherently fighting. Most of the battle casualties came during the rout, which is why motivated and disciplined forces were consistently able to beat forces multiples of their size. If you're tougher, they break first, and then they die en masse. Never mind that most casualties weren't battle casualties at all, but were deaths due to hunger, thirst, and disease. The great military leaders of the ancient world and middle ages weren't great because of "tactics" of any kind... they were great because they could both a) inspire loyalty b) keep troops fed, watered, and largely healthy Dany has those down. The Great Houses of Westeros, not so much. If she is defeated at this point, it will have to come from a mistake she makes... probably out of hubris. But tactics can play a large role in affecting troop morale. Enveloping the enemy like Hannibal did at Cannae can reduce their fighting strength. Great generals knew how to put their troops into positions where their fighting spirit would be high. A fair point. But the Punic Wars are an odd case: highly professional forces on both sides for several of the key engagements. Scipio and Hannibal had opportunities to use tactics in ways that were simply not available to, say, any army in the Crusades, or even the War of the Roses. Dany probably can employ tactics (presumably commanded by Selmy or Worm) given her force's modernesque discipline and combined arms, while the average Westerosi army will be, like the average medieval army, little more than a heavily armed mob. | ||
|
Aelfric
Turkey1496 Posts
May 20 2013 09:54 GMT
#16989
On May 20 2013 18:37 Yoav wrote: Show nested quote + On May 20 2013 18:11 Aelfric wrote: On May 20 2013 18:07 Yoav wrote: On May 20 2013 16:37 Aelfric wrote: On May 20 2013 16:06 Yoav wrote: On May 20 2013 15:51 albis wrote: dany + 2000men. needs a bit better guard detail though. True on the guards, but I hear Braavosi are slippery (see Syrio, Jaquen). I wouldn't give the Unsullied too hard a time. Most important than having 2000 men, Dany now has heavy cavalry. Added to her spearmen, dragons, and the light cavalry she's probably planning on acquiring from the Dothraki, she's looking at a very well balanced force. Smaller than the other Westerosi armies, but better trained and more cohesive. And remember that a smaller army is not always a disadvantage, particularly with the supply-line problems that plagued middle-age armies. An elite 10,000 man force might stand a good chance against 60,000 Lannisters who have to choose between staying near supply hubs or splitting into smaller hosts. Never mind the issues of discipline and morale. Methinks men are braver when dragons fight with them, rather than against them. Which is the bigger number, five or one ? Lol. Except that she was wrong. She would have died that night had her enemies not fought amongst themselves. Numbers aren't everything, even in a siege situation like she faced, where they matter more. In pre-modern battles, relatively few men were actually killed while both forces are coherently fighting. Most of the battle casualties came during the rout, which is why motivated and disciplined forces were consistently able to beat forces multiples of their size. If you're tougher, they break first, and then they die en masse. Never mind that most casualties weren't battle casualties at all, but were deaths due to hunger, thirst, and disease. The great military leaders of the ancient world and middle ages weren't great because of "tactics" of any kind... they were great because they could both a) inspire loyalty b) keep troops fed, watered, and largely healthy Dany has those down. The Great Houses of Westeros, not so much. If she is defeated at this point, it will have to come from a mistake she makes... probably out of hubris. You don't read much do you? Plenty, I assure you. But high fantasy often asks to be analyzed like history, rather than literature, so I try to oblige. For a literary view: Dany currently has a major plot riding on her, 4 major accessory characters (none of whom would have any purpose if she kicked it or lost her power), 2 entire cultures relevant only to her. All of this makes her unkillable/beatable for the time being. However, Martin is explicitly setting out to create a counterpoint to what he sees as more traditional high fantasy, and she is so much like a classic fantasy hero that her chances of ultimate victory are low. Furthermore, she has ascended from near-slavery to near-godhood, and her trajectory from here is unclear. To remain an interesting character, she will have to develop in one way or another, perhaps as a result of factionalism within her ranks. My guess is that she will be the season protagonist of next season. Show nested quote + On May 20 2013 18:19 SergioCQH wrote: On May 20 2013 18:07 Yoav wrote: On May 20 2013 16:37 Aelfric wrote: On May 20 2013 16:06 Yoav wrote: On May 20 2013 15:51 albis wrote: dany + 2000men. needs a bit better guard detail though. True on the guards, but I hear Braavosi are slippery (see Syrio, Jaquen). I wouldn't give the Unsullied too hard a time. Most important than having 2000 men, Dany now has heavy cavalry. Added to her spearmen, dragons, and the light cavalry she's probably planning on acquiring from the Dothraki, she's looking at a very well balanced force. Smaller than the other Westerosi armies, but better trained and more cohesive. And remember that a smaller army is not always a disadvantage, particularly with the supply-line problems that plagued middle-age armies. An elite 10,000 man force might stand a good chance against 60,000 Lannisters who have to choose between staying near supply hubs or splitting into smaller hosts. Never mind the issues of discipline and morale. Methinks men are braver when dragons fight with them, rather than against them. Which is the bigger number, five or one ? Lol. Except that she was wrong. She would have died that night had her enemies not fought amongst themselves. Numbers aren't everything, even in a siege situation like she faced, where they matter more. In pre-modern battles, relatively few men were actually killed while both forces are coherently fighting. Most of the battle casualties came during the rout, which is why motivated and disciplined forces were consistently able to beat forces multiples of their size. If you're tougher, they break first, and then they die en masse. Never mind that most casualties weren't battle casualties at all, but were deaths due to hunger, thirst, and disease. The great military leaders of the ancient world and middle ages weren't great because of "tactics" of any kind... they were great because they could both a) inspire loyalty b) keep troops fed, watered, and largely healthy Dany has those down. The Great Houses of Westeros, not so much. If she is defeated at this point, it will have to come from a mistake she makes... probably out of hubris. But tactics can play a large role in affecting troop morale. Enveloping the enemy like Hannibal did at Cannae can reduce their fighting strength. Great generals knew how to put their troops into positions where their fighting spirit would be high. A fair point. But the Punic Wars are an odd case: highly professional forces on both sides for several of the key engagements. Scipio and Hannibal had opportunities to use tactics in ways that were simply not available to, say, any army in the Crusades, or even the War of the Roses. Dany probably can employ tactics (presumably commanded by Selmy or Worm) given her force's modernesque discipline and combined arms, while the average Westerosi army will be, like the average medieval army, little more than a heavily armed mob. I wrote "you don't read much" cuz i explained that i agree with what the other guy says and i revealed the video in my next posts why i said "which is the bigger number". It was a quote from Robert and Cercei talking in season 1. It was a referance word. | ||
|
Domus
510 Posts
May 20 2013 10:10 GMT
#16990
On May 20 2013 18:07 Yoav wrote: Show nested quote + On May 20 2013 16:37 Aelfric wrote: On May 20 2013 16:06 Yoav wrote: On May 20 2013 15:51 albis wrote: dany + 2000men. needs a bit better guard detail though. True on the guards, but I hear Braavosi are slippery (see Syrio, Jaquen). I wouldn't give the Unsullied too hard a time. Most important than having 2000 men, Dany now has heavy cavalry. Added to her spearmen, dragons, and the light cavalry she's probably planning on acquiring from the Dothraki, she's looking at a very well balanced force. Smaller than the other Westerosi armies, but better trained and more cohesive. And remember that a smaller army is not always a disadvantage, particularly with the supply-line problems that plagued middle-age armies. An elite 10,000 man force might stand a good chance against 60,000 Lannisters who have to choose between staying near supply hubs or splitting into smaller hosts. Never mind the issues of discipline and morale. Methinks men are braver when dragons fight with them, rather than against them. Which is the bigger number, five or one ? On Military Numbers Lol. Except that she was wrong. She would have died that night had her enemies not fought amongst themselves. Numbers aren't everything, even in a siege situation like she faced, where they matter more. In pre-modern battles, relatively few men were actually killed while both forces are coherently fighting. Most of the battle casualties came during the rout, which is why motivated and disciplined forces were consistently able to beat forces multiples of their size. If you're tougher, they break first, and then they die en masse. Never mind that most casualties weren't battle casualties at all, but were deaths due to hunger, thirst, and disease. The great military leaders of the ancient world and middle ages weren't great because of "tactics" of any kind... they were great because they could both a) inspire loyalty b) keep troops fed, watered, and largely healthy Dany has those down. The Great Houses of Westeros, not so much. If she is defeated at this point, it will have to come from a mistake she makes... probably out of hubris. Edit: On Nudity Show nested quote + On May 20 2013 18:02 jcroisdale wrote: Gymnophobia (from Greek γυμνός - gumnos, "naked"[1] and φόβος - phobos, "fear"[2]) is a fear (phobia) of nudity. Gymnophobics experience anxiety from nudity, even if they realize their fear is irrational. They may worry about seeing others naked or being seen naked, or both. Their fear may stem from a general anxiety about sexuality, from a fear that they are physically inferior, or from a fear that their nakedness leaves them exposed and unprotected. Guys don't worry the boobies won't hurt you. They might even make a scene better. Actually, for some of us, the issue is that the extremely imbalanced male/female ratio suggests that much of the nudity is very much a matter of titillation. Several nude scenes were obviously unecessary titilation aimed at the lowest common denominator. But GoT has also had quite a few examples of how powerful nudity can be: Danaerys' whole plotline can be framed with her nude scenes, representing humiliation (bro/Drogo), rebirth (from the pyre), and now near godhood (this ep). But let's not kid ourselves that nudity is just another element like feasting or banners or long walks. Like violence, nudity and sex and important and literarily powerful. Gratuitous violence for its own sake has no place in literature. The same is true of nudity and sex. They are tools, and when present needlessly, draw unhelpful attention to themselves. I think you are just blocking out the male nudity. Because it is not that imbalanced. Ok, they don't show cock, but that is about it. In the last couple of episodes Theon, Jaime, Gendry, Loras, the male whore Loras was with... So, no, it is not extremely imbalanced at all, also keep in mind that the women in the game of thrones use sex as a weapon or tool.. | ||
|
Elizar
Germany431 Posts
May 20 2013 10:10 GMT
#16991
But the moment Sam was killing the white walker, exactly like one guy prophesized it in this thread, made me decide for myself that I won´t read anything more of this. It totally spoiled the fun for me, when I knew exactly what is going to happen before it happens. GOT is only once per week, and getting spoiled the fund isn´t really worth it. | ||
|
NightOfTheDead
Lithuania1711 Posts
May 20 2013 10:14 GMT
#16992
On May 20 2013 18:08 -Archangel- wrote: Hilarious are all the people that would pick up that dagger when 99% of you would probably just kneel in the snow waiting to die like that guy in S01EP01 did. Perhaps, but monkey is way smarter than Sam is, just because Sam thinks with something else. | ||
|
Xahhk
Canada540 Posts
May 20 2013 10:31 GMT
#16993
| ||
|
Mercurial
Canada92 Posts
May 20 2013 10:52 GMT
#16994
| ||
|
Fus Ro Dah
Singapore141 Posts
May 20 2013 10:58 GMT
#16995
| ||
|
Gosi
Sweden9072 Posts
May 20 2013 10:58 GMT
#16996
That crow scene was creepy tho. D: | ||
|
-Archangel-
Croatia7457 Posts
May 20 2013 11:07 GMT
#16997
On May 20 2013 19:14 NightOfTheDead wrote: Show nested quote + On May 20 2013 18:08 -Archangel- wrote: Hilarious are all the people that would pick up that dagger when 99% of you would probably just kneel in the snow waiting to die like that guy in S01EP01 did. Perhaps, but monkey is way smarter than Sam is, just because Sam thinks with something else. Fear is a powerful motivator for people to do stupid things. Just look what fear did to USA in last 12 years. | ||
|
Grovbolle
Denmark3813 Posts
May 20 2013 11:08 GMT
#16998
| ||
|
Thorakh
Netherlands1788 Posts
May 20 2013 11:20 GMT
#16999
All in all, I thought it to be one of the best episodes this season. I can't think of a single scene that wasn't unnecessary and the King's Landing scenes in particular were so good! | ||
|
AngryMag
Germany1040 Posts
May 20 2013 11:52 GMT
#17000
Overall I am still satisfied with GoT. It is quite unusual for me, as most series I watched so far started to bore me at some point. | ||
| ||
StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War BeSt Dota 2Leta Nal_rA Larva ZergMaN Shuttle soO Bale ToSsGirL Noble [ Show more ] League of Legends Super Smash Bros Other Games Organizations
StarCraft 2 • practicex StarCraft: Brood War• AfreecaTV YouTube • intothetv • Kozan • IndyKCrew • LaughNgamezSOOP • Migwel • sooper7s League of Legends |
|
Replay Cast
Wardi Open
Monday Night Weeklies
Replay Cast
Sparkling Tuna Cup
LiuLi Cup
Reynor vs Creator
Maru vs Lambo
PiGosaur Monday
Replay Cast
LiuLi Cup
Clem vs Rogue
SHIN vs Cyan
The PondCast
[ Show More ] KCM Race Survival
LiuLi Cup
Scarlett vs TriGGeR
ByuN vs herO
Replay Cast
Online Event
LiuLi Cup
Serral vs Zoun
Cure vs Classic
RSL Revival
RSL Revival
LiuLi Cup
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
RSL Revival
Replay Cast
Sparkling Tuna Cup
LiuLi Cup
Replay Cast
|
|
|