EPTIts when sinsing plays carry, cuckoo makes a post in the burden united thread, saying how bad he is at carrying.
Burden United Discussion - Page 18
| Forum Index > Dota 2 Player & Team Discussion |
|
Hoenicker
243 Posts
Its when sinsing plays carry, cuckoo makes a post in the burden united thread, saying how bad he is at carrying. | ||
|
FHDH
United States7023 Posts
On May 22 2015 22:49 Hoenicker wrote: Its when sinsing plays carry, cuckoo makes a post in the burden united thread, saying how bad he is at carrying. Ah that's an interesting pattern. Well Sing has been position one almost every game for this team since its inception so has he automated this process yet? | ||
|
govie
9334 Posts
| ||
|
cuckoo
595 Posts
I dont think Sing is bad at carrying, I think Neqro cant play mid against a high level competition. Probably due to experience, which Sing has a lot more by now. Closing to the Qualifiers they should change it asap, but thats like, my opinion | ||
|
Rodrak
United States165 Posts
Game 1: Was pretty solid, it got rocky towards the end but they kicked it into high gear. Game 2: Burden had a decent control on them at about 24 mintues, and that was when they needed to start looking for Smoke Rotations in which you'd use every ult on their Tiny/Wisp. It was really just not trying for an aggressive play that hurt them. But also, MyNuts seemed on tilt though, but everyone can get salty every once and a while. | ||
|
synapse
China13814 Posts
| ||
|
Rodrak
United States165 Posts
On May 24 2015 06:55 synapse wrote: I actually think mynuts played that last game quite well. He was basically going "space created" and keeping the tiny away from their towers, which was necessary given that they weren't able to teamfight into the tiny/wisp. Gyro and bristle were just too underfarmed to stop the tiny/wisp aegis push. Yeah, defiantly not saying he was bad, just felt he was tilt. Which could've affected his calls a tad (No Smokes, but i dont know know who is in charge of that) | ||
|
Matthias_
Netherlands89 Posts
| ||
|
Furikawari
France2522 Posts
 | ||
|
Rodrak
United States165 Posts
So it's even *shrug* | ||
|
Matthias_
Netherlands89 Posts
 | ||
|
LemOn
United Kingdom8629 Posts
if we the gods win last game 2-0 theyre through? | ||
|
Matthias_
Netherlands89 Posts
On May 30 2015 23:12 LemOn wrote: so if we the gods win last game 2-0 theyre through? Unless Alliance also win 2-0. It comes down to the results of both Alliance' and Burden's games. Finnstack quite strong though so I don't see them taking 2-0, but 1-1 doable, then hope Alliance drops at least 1 game against PR. Anybody how it's decided if there's a tie for second place? | ||
|
Hoenicker
243 Posts
On May 30 2015 23:16 Matthias_ wrote: Unless Alliance also win 2-0. It comes down to the results of both Alliance' and Burden's games. Finnstack quite strong though so I don't see them taking 2-0, but 1-1 doable, then hope Alliance drops at least 1 game against PR. Anybody how it's decided if there's a tie for second place? probably a playoff between the tied teams? Unfortunate the way they lost game 1 vs PR, i tyhink they shouldve laned differently, wouldve stood a better chance. | ||
|
cuckoo
595 Posts
| ||
|
cuckoo
595 Posts
outdrafted once again | ||
|
FHDH
United States7023 Posts
| ||
|
gulati
United States2241 Posts
| ||
|
FHDH
United States7023 Posts
On May 31 2015 02:47 gulati wrote: are they mathematically eliminated now? or still a chance? Chance if they win, but narrow. Eliminated if they lose. | ||
|
cuckoo
595 Posts
thats heartbreaking they're crumbling so hard | ||
| ||
