Burden United Discussion - Page 17
| Forum Index > Dota 2 Player & Team Discussion |
|
Hoenicker
243 Posts
| ||
|
Matthias_
Netherlands89 Posts
While I don't expect them to beat VG I think it's going to be interesting to see how they play against them. Might be good a good experience for the team. | ||
|
Hoenicker
243 Posts
| ||
|
cuckoo
595 Posts
but it's good to see them beating NIP, give me confidence for the EU Qual. And Sing is back to mid, awesome :D | ||
|
Hoenicker
243 Posts
| ||
|
shizaep
Canada2920 Posts
| ||
|
Zea!
9589 Posts
| ||
|
Hoenicker
243 Posts
| ||
|
Sa6peto
Bulgaria162 Posts
Impressive :D Now srsly that game 1 was great ... if they can just secure their early game abit more. Cus srsly lately its just screwing up the early game , and playing a catch up game . | ||
|
Furikawari
France2522 Posts
| ||
|
evanthebouncy!
United States12796 Posts
| ||
|
Saki [NETOGE]
United States235 Posts
| ||
|
Iplaythings
Denmark9110 Posts
On May 13 2015 14:38 Saki [NETOGE] wrote: They look like the first iteration of Tinker/Mouz. Except that there's a lack of players imploding on each other except for CWM, but CWM and sing were on Mouz with eachother for a long ass time so that makes for a chance of BU not imploding on itself, if we see sing as negating cwm's "toxic" factor. But yeah, first iteration of tinker was actually good, that team only started sucking after D2CL finals loss to navi :p | ||
|
Furikawari
France2522 Posts
On May 13 2015 14:38 Saki [NETOGE] wrote: They look like the first iteration of Tinker/Mouz. I dont agree, first iteration of Tinker had 0 support, BU has 2 true supports. And talking about toxicity, Tinker had to deal with Pajkatt ego. | ||
|
Hoenicker
243 Posts
| ||
|
cuckoo
595 Posts
oh well. | ||
|
FHDH
United States7023 Posts
Harpy needs a Nerf tbh. | ||
|
Hoenicker
243 Posts
| ||
|
cuckoo
595 Posts
The pattern is so clear | ||
|
FHDH
United States7023 Posts
On May 22 2015 21:52 cuckoo wrote: Then they put him at 1 position again and they lost, rofl The pattern is so clear What pattern is that, exactly? | ||
| ||