|
Recommended Games+ Show Spoiler ++ Show Spoiler [Game 1] +Poll: Recommend Flash vs Soma Game 1?Yes (31) 94% If you have time (2) 6% No (0) 0% 33 total votes Your vote: Recommend Flash vs Soma Game 1? (Vote): Yes
(Vote): No
(Vote): If you have time
Poll: Recommend Flash vs Soma Game 2?Yes (24) 96% If you have time (1) 4% No (0) 0% 25 total votes Your vote: Recommend Flash vs Soma Game 2? (Vote): Yes
(Vote): No
(Vote): If you have time
Poll: Recommend Flash vs Soma Game 3?Yes (29) 88% No (3) 9% If you have time (1) 3% 33 total votes Your vote: Recommend Flash vs Soma Game 3? (Vote): Yes
(Vote): No
(Vote): If you have time
Poll: Recommend Flash vs Soma Game 4?Yes (16) 57% No (8) 29% If you have time (4) 14% 28 total votes Your vote: Recommend Flash vs Soma Game 4? (Vote): Yes
(Vote): No
(Vote): If you have time
Poll: Recommend Flash vs Soma Game 5?If you have time (12) 50% Yes (8) 33% No (4) 17% 24 total votes Your vote: Recommend Flash vs Soma Game 5? (Vote): Yes
(Vote): No
(Vote): If you have time
Poll: Recommend Flash vs Soma Game 6?Yes (31) 97% No (1) 3% If you have time (0) 0% 32 total votes Your vote: Recommend Flash vs Soma Game 6? (Vote): Yes
(Vote): No
(Vote): If you have time
Poll: Recommend Flash vs Soma Game 7?Yes (29) 66% No (14) 32% If you have time (1) 2% 44 total votes Your vote: Recommend Flash vs Soma Game 7? (Vote): Yes
(Vote): No
(Vote): If you have time
|
On June 02 2026 22:53 Xenixx wrote:Show nested quote +On June 02 2026 08:58 Jealous wrote:On June 02 2026 03:41 Xenixx wrote:On June 01 2026 23:03 Jealous wrote:On June 01 2026 22:39 Xenixx wrote:On June 01 2026 13:21 Vasoline73 wrote:
On June 01 2026 12:50 Dante08 wrote:
On June 01 2026 11:24 GTR wrote:
The only interesting part of a simulation run like this is to see if the position is playable by the Terran. If it's playable then you can eek out a win, and if you can eek out a win then Flash made a poor decision to bet the entire game on defending the main with just scvs, ergo, he gg'd too early. If you're the type of person who takes low ranked ladder players games' in this position as some set in stone unassailable position then I'm sorry to inform you, you don't know half as much about this game as you think you do. I don't really have a problem with 70:30 from that position, and I have been totally consistent on this issue. Terran is behind here and has to play from behind the entire game, getting lucky with some decisive moves to hopefully eek out a win in this spot. For those of you who have never spoken to real people out in the streets, eek is like, a 10% win rate, it's small. It's game 7 of the last ASL you may ever play, shouldn't you take the hail mary option? For the fans, the viewers, it could make a very interesting game, something we've never seen before regardless of whether or not you're favored to win in this spot. Play the mess you made. Brother, I'm sorry, I wasn't going to say anything but you keep repeating the exact same talking point like a parrot which is basically par for the course here but you're also writing "eek" over and over, every time, throughout these posts and it finally broke me. The word you're looking for is " eke". Furthermore, I was curious about your anecdotal social experiment ("...to real people out in the streets, eek is like, a 10% win rate, it's small") and according to AI/Google that number is actually 50% because to "eke out a win" is to "win by a small margin" meaning that it was basically 50/50 leading up to that moment, so basically a one point basketball game where the teams are 120-119, for example. So, not only are you spelling the word incorrectly, you are also misusing it, all while repeating the same subjective-ass opinion every time. Please, have mercy. PS: Terms closer to what you seem to mean would be a comeback, reversal, come-from-behind, turnaround, rally, etc. Is it? I don't think I've ever typed that word out before now, so, good times, that'll happen. But on your other point, so FYI, dictionaries aren't authoritative. I've never heard anyone use the term to describe a coin toss. I think you're way off base with that idea, and, are in desperate need of talking to real people, not AI. When we use the term eke, it means to barely win, which is also covered by the dictionaries and exactly how I was using it. You can also tell by the context. Eke To obtain with difficulty Yes, my apologies, I'm sure your erudite social environment "on the streets" is the authority on what the English words you can't spell mean. Although, I want to point out that winning 120-119 is "barely winning" and not the 10% chance of winning you're trying to describe. But, let's set semantics aside. Let's get to what I find to be the heart of the issue I have with your opinion: FlaSh has been playing StarCraft for your free entertainment for 20 years, is the undisputed GOAT and "God" of the game, played through numerous surgeries, and found himself in what he thought to be a losing situation. He doesn't owe you 3 more minutes of floundering around when he feels the game is lost, despite what you think you or the fans are entitled to, which could hypothetically bring greater embarrassment down the line. In fact, he doesn't owe you anything at all. Yes, dictionaries only describe how words are used by people, common usage. AKA, you know, on the streets. Why don't you ask your friend Google AI about it instead? Feels like we're back in high school in here but you people are no doubt in your late 20's or early 30's. How embarrassing...
You are no doubt in your late 20's or early 30's, grandstanding on a videogame forum about how you deserved to see more gameplay in a videogame from a Korean guy you've never met on the other side of the planet. When that Korean guy is the undisputed GOAT of the game and undoubtedly leagues ahead of you in game understanding - not that this being untrue would make the previous sentence and description of your chosen beliefs to be any less ridiculous.
You punctuate your grandstanding with "eek" and repeat the same argument over and over, showing no logical development to your ideas. Like a lunatic raving at strangers saying that the end of days has come on a random city street corner, oblivious to his own delusions and how he is perceived. Using "the streets" and "people" as your anecdotal evidence for why your words mean what you subjectively believe they mean. In defiance of the objective and written definitions of those words, easily confirmable by any literate person who has read a sports headline in the past hundred years.
The capstone to this generational achievement in public discourse is you bringing in the same tired insult logic that plagues the cesspool that is social media, e.g. "everyone who disagrees with me must be a no life loser", "they must have no friends", i.e. "go touch grass", as if someone pointing out your factually incorrect usage of a word is proof that they are somehow socially inept and not that you just don't know the language you attempt to write in. Which further highlights your lack of self-awareness and how silly your initial position and vehemence in defending it already looked.
I know you're only using what God gave you. It's okay.
|
United States10457 Posts
On June 03 2026 01:50 Jealous wrote:Show nested quote +On June 02 2026 22:53 Xenixx wrote:On June 02 2026 08:58 Jealous wrote:On June 02 2026 03:41 Xenixx wrote:On June 01 2026 23:03 Jealous wrote:On June 01 2026 22:39 Xenixx wrote:On June 01 2026 13:21 Vasoline73 wrote:
On June 01 2026 12:50 Dante08 wrote:
On June 01 2026 11:24 GTR wrote:
The only interesting part of a simulation run like this is to see if the position is playable by the Terran. If it's playable then you can eek out a win, and if you can eek out a win then Flash made a poor decision to bet the entire game on defending the main with just scvs, ergo, he gg'd too early. If you're the type of person who takes low ranked ladder players games' in this position as some set in stone unassailable position then I'm sorry to inform you, you don't know half as much about this game as you think you do. I don't really have a problem with 70:30 from that position, and I have been totally consistent on this issue. Terran is behind here and has to play from behind the entire game, getting lucky with some decisive moves to hopefully eek out a win in this spot. For those of you who have never spoken to real people out in the streets, eek is like, a 10% win rate, it's small. It's game 7 of the last ASL you may ever play, shouldn't you take the hail mary option? For the fans, the viewers, it could make a very interesting game, something we've never seen before regardless of whether or not you're favored to win in this spot. Play the mess you made. Brother, I'm sorry, I wasn't going to say anything but you keep repeating the exact same talking point like a parrot which is basically par for the course here but you're also writing "eek" over and over, every time, throughout these posts and it finally broke me. The word you're looking for is " eke". Furthermore, I was curious about your anecdotal social experiment ("...to real people out in the streets, eek is like, a 10% win rate, it's small") and according to AI/Google that number is actually 50% because to "eke out a win" is to "win by a small margin" meaning that it was basically 50/50 leading up to that moment, so basically a one point basketball game where the teams are 120-119, for example. So, not only are you spelling the word incorrectly, you are also misusing it, all while repeating the same subjective-ass opinion every time. Please, have mercy. PS: Terms closer to what you seem to mean would be a comeback, reversal, come-from-behind, turnaround, rally, etc. Is it? I don't think I've ever typed that word out before now, so, good times, that'll happen. But on your other point, so FYI, dictionaries aren't authoritative. I've never heard anyone use the term to describe a coin toss. I think you're way off base with that idea, and, are in desperate need of talking to real people, not AI. When we use the term eke, it means to barely win, which is also covered by the dictionaries and exactly how I was using it. You can also tell by the context. Eke To obtain with difficulty Yes, my apologies, I'm sure your erudite social environment "on the streets" is the authority on what the English words you can't spell mean. Although, I want to point out that winning 120-119 is "barely winning" and not the 10% chance of winning you're trying to describe. But, let's set semantics aside. Let's get to what I find to be the heart of the issue I have with your opinion: FlaSh has been playing StarCraft for your free entertainment for 20 years, is the undisputed GOAT and "God" of the game, played through numerous surgeries, and found himself in what he thought to be a losing situation. He doesn't owe you 3 more minutes of floundering around when he feels the game is lost, despite what you think you or the fans are entitled to, which could hypothetically bring greater embarrassment down the line. In fact, he doesn't owe you anything at all. Yes, dictionaries only describe how words are used by people, common usage. AKA, you know, on the streets. Why don't you ask your friend Google AI about it instead? Feels like we're back in high school in here but you people are no doubt in your late 20's or early 30's. How embarrassing... You are no doubt in your late 20's or early 30's, grandstanding on a videogame forum about how you deserved to see more gameplay in a videogame from a Korean guy you've never met on the other side of the planet. When that Korean guy is the undisputed GOAT of the game and undoubtedly leagues ahead of you in game understanding - not that this being untrue would make the previous sentence and description of your chosen beliefs to be any less ridiculous. You punctuate your grandstanding with "eek" and repeat the same argument over and over, showing no logical development to your ideas. Like a lunatic raving at strangers saying that the end of days has come on a random city street corner, oblivious to his own delusions and how he is perceived. Using "the streets" and "people" as your anecdotal evidence for why your words mean what you subjectively believe they mean. In defiance of the objective and written definitions of those words, easily confirmable by any literate person who has read a sports headline in the past hundred years. The capstone to this generational achievement in public discourse is you bringing in the same tired insult logic that plagues the cesspool that is social media, e.g. "everyone who disagrees with me must be a no life loser", "they must have no friends", i.e. "go touch grass", as if someone pointing out your factually incorrect usage of a word is proof that they are somehow socially inept and not that you just don't know the language you attempt to write in. Which further highlights your lack of self-awareness and how silly your initial position and vehemence in defending it already looked. I know you're only using what God gave you. It's okay.
Grudgematch over the linguistic use of the word "eke/eek" please.
|
Hopefully, we will have another FlaSh season ;(
|
On June 03 2026 01:50 Jealous wrote:Show nested quote +On June 02 2026 22:53 Xenixx wrote:On June 02 2026 08:58 Jealous wrote:On June 02 2026 03:41 Xenixx wrote:On June 01 2026 23:03 Jealous wrote:On June 01 2026 22:39 Xenixx wrote:On June 01 2026 13:21 Vasoline73 wrote:
On June 01 2026 12:50 Dante08 wrote:
On June 01 2026 11:24 GTR wrote:
The only interesting part of a simulation run like this is to see if the position is playable by the Terran. If it's playable then you can eek out a win, and if you can eek out a win then Flash made a poor decision to bet the entire game on defending the main with just scvs, ergo, he gg'd too early. If you're the type of person who takes low ranked ladder players games' in this position as some set in stone unassailable position then I'm sorry to inform you, you don't know half as much about this game as you think you do. I don't really have a problem with 70:30 from that position, and I have been totally consistent on this issue. Terran is behind here and has to play from behind the entire game, getting lucky with some decisive moves to hopefully eek out a win in this spot. For those of you who have never spoken to real people out in the streets, eek is like, a 10% win rate, it's small. It's game 7 of the last ASL you may ever play, shouldn't you take the hail mary option? For the fans, the viewers, it could make a very interesting game, something we've never seen before regardless of whether or not you're favored to win in this spot. Play the mess you made. Brother, I'm sorry, I wasn't going to say anything but you keep repeating the exact same talking point like a parrot which is basically par for the course here but you're also writing "eek" over and over, every time, throughout these posts and it finally broke me. The word you're looking for is " eke". Furthermore, I was curious about your anecdotal social experiment ("...to real people out in the streets, eek is like, a 10% win rate, it's small") and according to AI/Google that number is actually 50% because to "eke out a win" is to "win by a small margin" meaning that it was basically 50/50 leading up to that moment, so basically a one point basketball game where the teams are 120-119, for example. So, not only are you spelling the word incorrectly, you are also misusing it, all while repeating the same subjective-ass opinion every time. Please, have mercy. PS: Terms closer to what you seem to mean would be a comeback, reversal, come-from-behind, turnaround, rally, etc. Is it? I don't think I've ever typed that word out before now, so, good times, that'll happen. But on your other point, so FYI, dictionaries aren't authoritative. I've never heard anyone use the term to describe a coin toss. I think you're way off base with that idea, and, are in desperate need of talking to real people, not AI. When we use the term eke, it means to barely win, which is also covered by the dictionaries and exactly how I was using it. You can also tell by the context. Eke To obtain with difficulty Yes, my apologies, I'm sure your erudite social environment "on the streets" is the authority on what the English words you can't spell mean. Although, I want to point out that winning 120-119 is "barely winning" and not the 10% chance of winning you're trying to describe. But, let's set semantics aside. Let's get to what I find to be the heart of the issue I have with your opinion: FlaSh has been playing StarCraft for your free entertainment for 20 years, is the undisputed GOAT and "God" of the game, played through numerous surgeries, and found himself in what he thought to be a losing situation. He doesn't owe you 3 more minutes of floundering around when he feels the game is lost, despite what you think you or the fans are entitled to, which could hypothetically bring greater embarrassment down the line. In fact, he doesn't owe you anything at all. Yes, dictionaries only describe how words are used by people, common usage. AKA, you know, on the streets. Why don't you ask your friend Google AI about it instead? Feels like we're back in high school in here but you people are no doubt in your late 20's or early 30's. How embarrassing... You are no doubt in your late 20's or early 30's, grandstanding on a videogame forum about how you deserved to see more gameplay in a videogame from a Korean guy you've never met on the other side of the planet. When that Korean guy is the undisputed GOAT of the game and undoubtedly leagues ahead of you in game understanding - not that this being untrue would make the previous sentence and description of your chosen beliefs to be any less ridiculous. You punctuate your grandstanding with "eek" and repeat the same argument over and over, showing no logical development to your ideas. Like a lunatic raving at strangers saying that the end of days has come on a random city street corner, oblivious to his own delusions and how he is perceived. Using "the streets" and "people" as your anecdotal evidence for why your words mean what you subjectively believe they mean. In defiance of the objective and written definitions of those words, easily confirmable by any literate person who has read a sports headline in the past hundred years. The capstone to this generational achievement in public discourse is you bringing in the same tired insult logic that plagues the cesspool that is social media, e.g. "everyone who disagrees with me must be a no life loser", "they must have no friends", i.e. "go touch grass", as if someone pointing out your factually incorrect usage of a word is proof that they are somehow socially inept and not that you just don't know the language you attempt to write in. Which further highlights your lack of self-awareness and how silly your initial position and vehemence in defending it already looked. I know you're only using what God gave you. It's okay.
I still cannot fathom how you get any of that out of what I said. Deserved to see more? You have to reach and project so hard, and, all this reaching because your feelings are hurt over how wrong you were about how I used the word eke...
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
