Blizzard Classic Games "quietly dismantled" - Page 4
Forum Index > BW General |
hgjjhghgjhgj
2 Posts
| ||
KJDFUZREGFD
2 Posts
| ||
outscar
2828 Posts
| ||
Lorch
Germany3666 Posts
On January 27 2021 06:08 outscar wrote: Does SB supports 1.16.1 still? I'm out of touch lately, if it is that will be amazing. I'm really tired from fucked up SD graphics on Remastered. Actually, that's a really good point. If we do end up having to move away from b.net onto private servers/shield battery, whats the point of using remastered over the original client? SD graphics are just fine in 1.16.1 and the new graphics do have some flaws (worse visibility, all graphics being slightly off centered etc.). We know how to get 1.16.1 to run just fine on Windows 10, so even that advantage of remastered is null and void. | ||
ProMeTheus112
France2027 Posts
perfect would be that you can use them with full screen also since that's allowed with the new graphics, but need to render them properly. if nobody can full screen then w/e i guess. I mean theres an issue anyway due to the bottom UI being drawn in 4:3 lul but anyway need proper render t_t i've been having some fun playing 3v3s 4v4s with friends lately, nice that you can pick colors now however honestly there are a few colors that look way too close to each other so that's kinda dumb, can barely tell the difference between gray and black zeals or tan and white and a few others even on minimap that's kinda dumb. I mean the original game doesn't have that issue. I think that may be made worse by the new graphics actually idk cause then it wouldn't be an issue on minimap also hey it's something ICCup has always missed is that it was only counting ladder games but you couldn't play like 3v3s and get stats for it that was missing you know : D i love to play 3v3 with some mix of premade vs whoever and it's just nice to get a stat count for it everyone likes that i think | ||
Jealous
10081 Posts
This is doubly true because you not only don't want to estrange the people who grew used to RM graphics, but also because RM is free and legal to DL from Blizzard while 1.16 is abandonware for years at this point. Expecting people to have 1.16 is essentially shutting the door on legal and accessible options for new players, which is always bad. Add this to the fact that many viewers/casuals imaginable prefer RM graphics, I believe that RM is the only choice for SB and y'all are wasting your time discussing 1.16 in this context. | ||
tec27
United States3690 Posts
On January 27 2021 08:59 Jealous wrote: As I said before, tec27 mentioned before that they are working on RM support. There is no point in hypothecizing about which version will be better. This is doubly true because you not only don't want to estrange the people who grew used to RM graphics, but also because RM is free and legal to DL from Blizzard while 1.16 is abandonware for years at this point. Expecting people to have 1.16 is essentially shutting the door on legal and accessible options for new players, which is always bad. Add this to the fact that many viewers/casuals imaginable prefer RM graphics, I believe that RM is the only choice for SB and y'all are wasting your time discussing 1.16 in this context. Yep, 100% this. Fixing how Remastered renders SD graphics is on my planned roadmap, definitely not the highest priority thing though. | ||
wimpwimpwimp
157 Posts
If your vertical screen resolution is 1440 or higher, I believe 2560 * 1440 will also work fine. | ||
ProMeTheus112
France2027 Posts
however i can confirm even using my old CRT on remaster it still wasn't drawing the SD graphics properly (that CRT was running the 640*480 like all CRT can do) i mean have you tried wimpwimpwimp? cause it doesn't work here, SC:R switches to its own resolution which you can't pick, if I set my screen to 1280*1024 i get my input lag and lower refresh rate on desktop, run SC:R the resolution switches for it and the SD graphics are drawn badly as always besides you want to be able to pick that resolution from within the game so it starts it up automatically and not switch your desktop resolution every time you run the game | ||
Lorch
Germany3666 Posts
| ||
Cele
Germany4016 Posts
On January 28 2021 00:13 Lorch wrote: I'm pretty sure somebody confirmed a while ago that SCR uses the same compression for HD and SD sprites which just happens to look like dogshit in SD mode. No changes to your resolution are gonna fix that. Yep, him and me paid 15 € for that dogshit, or for worse graphics than before. | ||
HaN-
France1919 Posts
Poll: How important SD graphics getting fixed is for you? Can't wait (57) Don't care (54) 111 total votes Your vote: How important SD graphics getting fixed is for you? | ||
hgfhfgdsaasdhfghghgf
1 Post
| ||
Jealous
10081 Posts
| ||
hgfgfsada
3 Posts
| ||
Cele
Germany4016 Posts
On January 28 2021 02:50 Jealous wrote: An SD fix would be nice but frankly I've been playing with SD ever since a line of Zerglings ran past 2 of my "HD" Zealots on a ramp on Arcadia in like frontier league and I don't even notice/care anymore, and that is with me playing 1.16 consistently over the past 2 years as well. Really seems like a very minor loss of quality but maybe it is due to my setup(s). Nah i dont notice it every day to, its just upsetting to have paid for that downgrade as a matter of principle. | ||
hgfgfsada
3 Posts
| ||
Cele
Germany4016 Posts
SD graphics are part of sc:r, thus i paid for them. Bw graphics are better than sc:r sd graphics. Thuse i paid for a downgrade. | ||
hgfgfsada
3 Posts
| ||
BigFan
TLADT24920 Posts
| ||
| ||