EPTI might play a bit more tomorrow (NA evening)
Well, let's try BW - Page 7
| Forum Index > BW General |
|
emjaytron
Australia544 Posts
I might play a bit more tomorrow (NA evening) | ||
|
hellbound
United Kingdom2242 Posts
On February 27 2012 15:45 sluggaslamoo wrote: I'm from Melbourne, sometimes the latency is bad, but 90% of the time it ceases to be a problem. Make sure you have lan latency working. If you are getting jitter change the latency setting to high or extra-high. F10 - O - N - E - O, puts it into extra-high lat mode (or F10 - O - N - H - O for high lat). Being in Australia that setting is common, although these days I put it in high lat and just deal with the tiny jitter instead of extra-high because it allows faster response times. Keep in mind that unlike SCII BW is P2P, so server ping is a rather arbitrary number for determining how much lag there will be. Two NZ guys could both have 600 ping and play each other with low latency just fine. | ||
|
doubleupgradeobbies!
Australia1361 Posts
On February 27 2012 15:49 emjaytron wrote: I know about the high latency thing, but I don't understand why its preventing me hosting games? I have the ports for BW forwarded 6112-19. its really lame Ahh that is another issue with high latency, where the game name gets glitched. It's not an issue with high latency per se, but it seems to happen more often for people with high ping (eg us in australia). You can avoid the problem by /stats when you host a game. If it shows people who arn't actually there (usually people you just played, sometimes other names) then you need to host the game with a different name. It seems we have all sorts of weird problems with lag. I also have a recurring problem where there is some IP incompatibility or something, where there is a group of us, but 2 people just can't get into the same game without massive lag, everyone else can join the game with either one of them and it works fine, but when those 2 are in the same game it becomes unplayable. Sometimes resetting the modem to force an ip switch solves it, but none of us have reliably dynamic IP anymore so we can't just change our IP at will. Australian internet ftl >< | ||
|
Biff The Understudy
France8212 Posts
On February 24 2012 08:33 Kipsate wrote: Terran Steel is the greatest force of in the universe, you won't regret using it to feast upon dragoon blood. I totally agree with you and... Oh... Wait... Oh... Nooo Oooh... | ||
|
sluggaslamoo
Australia4494 Posts
On February 27 2012 20:42 Biff The Understudy wrote: I totally agree with you and... Oh... Wait... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I3OQJKlbOuI Oh... Nooo http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7FasNT0eFzw Oooh... Oh snap! | ||
|
Z-BosoN
Brazil2590 Posts
im also considering going back to bw just so i can escape the bs TvP metagame that is sc2, where tanks are so pathetic it saddens my soul. I actually liked it when tosses broke out of my contains, they were so good at finding weaknesses in my set-up and strategically holding out until they had enough to break it. Being wrecked by brilliant engagements made me respect my opponent instead of hating him for being able to do 1-a and demolishing an elaborate contain with a ton of tanks. This alone is mostly why I agree with the "you can lose 200 games and still keep going" post. man, <3 bw | ||
|
epoc
Finland1190 Posts
On February 27 2012 12:53 sluggaslamoo wrote: Does it have full NKey Rollover though? Not all majestouch's have it (plus you need to use PS/2). Probably not likely the issue anyway. I am happy to help you practise against Protoss. I used to be random anyway haha. I have pretty good muta micro too from playing muta micro maps with friends and religiously doing 2 hatch muta builds, so I can help you with that too  I am currently helping a bunch of SC2 newbies with BW so I could probably hook you up with one of them.Main thing newbies don't do is focus fire on the mutas, and also understanding the "dance" (do the opposite of what the mutas do), and SC2 players are also in the mindset that 1 turret can hold off an entire muta flock, turrets feel like they do about 10% of what they do in SC2 and mutas are a lot stronger at the same time. You also need to cluster your turrets with good positioning so that mutas can't knock em down 1 by 1, not spread them out like you do in SC2. But yeah best to learn one matchup at a time. I don't understand this dance. What's the purpose behind it? | ||
|
a5mod
France61 Posts
User was warned for this post | ||
|
pedduck
Thailand468 Posts
On February 27 2012 23:34 a5mod wrote: why play bw sc2 is better you have no idea what you are talking about. Anyway, to OP, yeah terran is the right choice for you. The way we play Terran comes from this 4 guys namely "Boxer" "Nada" "Iloveoov" and "Flash". so find these guys replay or Vod and start practicing!! | ||
|
Zoler
Sweden6339 Posts
On February 27 2012 22:38 Z-BosoN wrote: man, how i miss being able to mech... containing opponents was my favorite style of play im also considering going back to bw just so i can escape the bs TvP metagame that is sc2, where tanks are so pathetic it saddens my soul. I actually liked it when tosses broke out of my contains, they were so good at finding weaknesses in my set-up and strategically holding out until they had enough to break it. Being wrecked by brilliant engagements made me respect my opponent instead of hating him for being able to do 1-a and demolishing an elaborate contain with a ton of tanks. This alone is mostly why I agree with the "you can lose 200 games and still keep going" post. man, <3 bw fucking thissss man fuck sc2 =( | ||
|
fabiano
Brazil4644 Posts
On February 27 2012 23:26 epoc wrote: I don't understand this dance. What's the purpose behind it? To minimize the damage to your mutas and to keep them stacked. | ||
|
blubbdavid
Switzerland2412 Posts
http://wiki.teamliquid.net/starcraft/Mutalisk_Harassment | ||
|
epoc
Finland1190 Posts
On February 28 2012 00:35 fabiano wrote: To minimize the damage to your mutas and to keep them stacked. No no I mean why do the marines do the opposite that mutas do? | ||
|
fabiano
Brazil4644 Posts
| ||
|
pettter
Sweden1032 Posts
On February 28 2012 00:56 epoc wrote: No no I mean why do the marines do the opposite that mutas do? Marines have slightly longer range than mutas, so you want to lure the mutas in far enough to get some shots off without the mutas actually firing due to you backing off just enough. | ||
|
btd978
United States17 Posts
 ill be on iccup as btd978 and am D- too msg me and add me! | ||
|
hellbound
United Kingdom2242 Posts
On February 28 2012 01:19 pettter wrote: Marines have slightly longer range than mutas, so you want to lure the mutas in far enough to get some shots off without the mutas actually firing due to you backing off just enough. I think the more important aspect of dancing marines is making opponents mutas misfire or fly in too deep by making it hard to judge distance and timing of the engagement. If done properly it will keep the marines in formation too. Edit: Annex of self-depreciation. I am just saying this from the perspective of a useless C- zerg. Take it as you will. I'm sure sooner or later a terran will pop in and tell it how it be. | ||
|
NinjoOb
Canada128 Posts
On February 28 2012 02:24 hellbound wrote: I think the more important aspect of dancing marines is making opponents mutas misfire or fly in too deep by making it hard to judge distance and timing of the engagement. If done properly it will keep the marines in formation too. Edit: Annex of self-depreciation. I am just saying this from the perspective of a useless C- zerg. Take it as you will. I'm sure sooner or later a terran will pop in and tell it how it be. From my perspective, the idea behind this is that it creates a "all my marines will shoot one of your mutas down or you won't get to attack my marines at all" situation. I watched a few fpvods of pros back when muta harass gave me a lot of trouble (it still does now that I think of it) and you can see they clump the marines together, move forward as the muta stack does, then target fire one of the mutas. When it's done correctly you can pick off a muta everytime (easier if you went for a fast +1 attack upgrade on your marines) and then it becomes quite a bad trade for the zerg. On the other hand if you simply target a muta and let your marines chase it or worse if you attack move, then your marines will get picked off 1,2 or 3 at a time without doing much damage. | ||
|
krzych113
United Kingdom547 Posts
. | ||
|
ticklishmusic
United States15977 Posts
+ Show Spoiler + ![[image loading]](http://assets.diylol.com/hfs/4f6/21b/df9/resized/unimpressed-flash-meme-generator-masters-sc2-d-on-iccup-edc39a.jpg) User was warned for this post | ||
| ||
