Gender test required for runner? - Page 5
Forum Index > General Games |
Astray
Canada59 Posts
| ||
lazz
Australia3119 Posts
can't give birth? it's a man, baby. | ||
jello_biafra
United Kingdom6632 Posts
| ||
mindspike
Canada1902 Posts
On August 22 2009 02:57 lazz wrote: can she give birth? woman can't give birth? it's a man, baby. You know a lot of women can't give birth right? | ||
decafchicken
United States19919 Posts
| ||
FirstBorn
Romania3955 Posts
| ||
lazz
Australia3119 Posts
On August 22 2009 03:05 mindspike wrote: You know a lot of women can't give birth right? ok, ill agree that infertility is an exception to this rule, if a woman has all the tubes and shit set up right, hormones at a woman-like level but it's just that their eggs dont work thats close enough. anything other than that though.. wtf it's a man | ||
Inkatha
United States50 Posts
Interview with her, listen to her voice! | ||
2b-Rigtheous
Korea (South)50 Posts
| ||
Jibba
United States22883 Posts
On August 22 2009 03:22 2b-Rigtheous wrote: Not that it wasn't obvious already, but women just can't even remotely compete with men in sports. It's laughable. I hate it when feminists say Men and Women are the same. If that's the case, then what's the problem with her looking like a man? You should stop posting before you reveal any more of your stupidity. All of your sentences are just wrong. BTW, pound for pound, a female wrestler should beat a male wrestler. | ||
ActualSteve
United States627 Posts
On August 20 2009 18:01 JohnColtrane wrote: anyone remember that roid controversy in the female swimming ages ago? btw thats a woman on the right lol ROOOFL Large and in charge! | ||
KingofHearts
Japan562 Posts
| ||
Warrior Madness
Canada3791 Posts
| ||
ghostWriter
United States3302 Posts
On August 20 2009 22:11 L wrote: Because in the majority of them, women would never even qualify. You can look at the differences in world records for most events to see the discrepancy. So why have sports events for women at all? | ||
| ||
SweeTLemonS[TPR]
11739 Posts
On August 22 2009 03:25 Jibba wrote: You should stop posting before you reveal any more of your stupidity. All of your sentences are just wrong. BTW, pound for pound, a female wrestler should beat a male wrestler. But they don't. On August 22 2009 04:41 ghostWriter wrote: So why have sports events for women at all? Because they can't qualify in the male tournaments? That should be pretty obvious. | ||
Myrmidon
United States9452 Posts
| ||
Jibba
United States22883 Posts
They're not allowed to compete together for that reason. Some sports are excluded for male advantage, some are excluded for female advantage. The difference in upper body strength is mitigated by much better flexibility and better leverage. Actually, I believe the biggest advantage men have over women is simply height, not muscle composition. Durability is worse for females (the number of ligament tears for women is ridiculously high compared to male athletes) though. | ||
Patriot.dlk
Sweden5462 Posts
On August 21 2009 15:09 Arnic wrote: How intriguing. I'd be interested to know more about the testing they do to determine gender in situations like this. Maybe a third gender category could be introduced for the future. Please choose from the following. [ ] Male [ ] Female [ ] Hermaphrodite/Transexual/Unsure at the moment. Also wonder if being hormonally imbalanced would affect gymnastics. This line from the article is amazing. "Weiss said there had not been enough time to reach a conclusion. “She was unknown three weeks ago,” he told reporters. “Nobody could anticipate this one. Sorry. We are fast, but we are not a lion.” Lions, reknowned for being fast. haha nice post | ||
Refrige
United States179 Posts
| ||
| ||