EPTThe bug is not only achieved by a turret building under it either. It can be done from just flying the ob to the top of the turret (if it lives, which it usually can).
WCG 07 Turret, Observer and Storm - Page 3
| Forum Index > Brood War Tournaments |
|
CharlieMurphy
United States22895 Posts
The bug is not only achieved by a turret building under it either. It can be done from just flying the ob to the top of the turret (if it lives, which it usually can). | ||
|
NarutO
Germany18839 Posts
EX got a regame and lost that too. So why do you want to disqualify him omg? | ||
|
trollbone
France1905 Posts
| ||
|
LastWish
2013 Posts
Like what if the terran builds a turret under my obs, should I be now responsible to move it elsewhere? And of course fuck you Tasteless, you should be banned instead. If you saw it why didn't you stop the game right away and notify the corresponding person that he is about to do something against the law. Would it ruin the game? NO. Would one of the player's get unfair advantage? NO. Would it prevent this Disaster from happening? YES. | ||
Liquid`Drone
Norway28520 Posts
you just have to press s many times and the turret starts firing and observer dies.. and honestly, if someone abuses this through making a turret not work for 5 seconds right before they're zealot bombing, they deserve the advantage:[ | ||
|
niteReloaded
Croatia5281 Posts
| ||
|
HaXxorIzed
Australia8434 Posts
| ||
|
mstercrack
United States43 Posts
| ||
|
Frits
11782 Posts
| ||
|
Fen
Australia1848 Posts
| ||
|
BlackStar
Netherlands3029 Posts
Instead, they want to switch to real life soap of progamers because the games themselves aren't interesting enough for the audience. At least that's what one of the guys said at WCG US. | ||
|
Commander-Zerg
Canada341 Posts
Edit: just watched and didn't see turret bug T_T | ||
|
MyLostTemple
United States2921 Posts
On October 06 2007 11:24 mahnini wrote: Don't blame Tasteless. >: [ he's not blaming me, i was there when he wrote this post. stork was definitely winning in the game vs ex anyways, i asked the refs if the bug was illegal because i was sitting behind stork watching and i saw him do it. Some of the Koreans i asked there said it was illegal in Korean tournaments too. Anyways, i didn't know it was going to cause a shit storm of drama. I do think it's very important for a tournament to uphold it's rules, regardless of how minor this bug abuse was. | ||
|
Phleiart
52 Posts
| ||
|
Liquid`Drone
Norway28520 Posts
it's more that there really shouldn't be a rule against that bug. and if there is a rule against both this bug, and say, peonstacking, or even more severe bugs, the penalty for the two cannot be the same.. if someone did a fast flying drone and expanded to an island after 2 minutes of the game, disqualifying them from the entire competition seems proper. but that, and wasting 25/75 to make something that costs 75/0 not work for a temporary period of time, can't really be compared, at all. | ||
|
berated-
United States1134 Posts
On October 07 2007 01:08 Phleiart wrote: yea but then he needs to be given a loose as the rules say! The rules don't say that. The rules say it is up to the referees to determine his punishment. They determined what his punishment was and things moved on. If its not worth arguing about why the rules are in place then its not worth arguing about how the punishments to the rules are handed out. | ||
|
MyLostTemple
United States2921 Posts
On October 07 2007 01:10 Liquid`Drone wrote: i also think it's important to uphold the rules. but disqualifying someone for using a minor bug in a game he would have won anyway and won anyway would be far too harsh of a penalty. making them rematch should be more than sufficient, in fact I think even that is usually going too far, but there needs to be a penalty so that I can agree with. it's more that there really shouldn't be a rule against that bug. and if there is a rule against both this bug, and say, peonstacking, or even more severe bugs, the penalty for the two cannot be the same.. if someone did a fast flying drone and expanded to an island after 2 minutes of the game, disqualifying them from the entire competition seems proper. but that, and wasting 25/75 to make something that costs 75/0 not work for a temporary period of time, can't really be compared, at all. i think you missread the post. the game was disqualified, not the player, stork rematched and won. | ||
|
-WGT-Stars-
United States888 Posts
| ||
|
humblegar
Norway883 Posts
| ||
|
Dknight
United States5223 Posts
On October 06 2007 23:34 LastWish wrote: Umm stupid rule, it does not give that type of unfair advantage, and can be avoided. Like what if the terran builds a turret under my obs, should I be now responsible to move it elsewhere? And of course fuck you Tasteless, you should be banned instead. If you saw it why didn't you stop the game right away and notify the corresponding person that he is about to do something against the law. Would it ruin the game? NO. Would one of the player's get unfair advantage? NO. Would it prevent this Disaster from happening? YES. Concerning your first question. If there is a non-hardware related problem in the game, the game is not paused. Players submit a complaint after the match is finished which is what Ex did. How can you even say that about Tasteless? We, the admin crew, saw it in game and were discussing what to do about it. As soon as the game finished, Ex came over and submitted a complaint. After what seemed to be a bit, the decision was made to regame. | ||
| ||
