EPTOn August 28 2013 18:08 Douillos wrote:
And ESF fans? Will they cheer for... nobody?
And ESF fans? Will they cheer for... nobody?
There are no ESF fans, only anti kespa peeps.
Major Shift in KeSPA Structure: Open to All - Page 4
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
Assirra
Belgium4169 Posts
There are no ESF fans, only anti kespa peeps. | ||
|
Cele
Germany4016 Posts
| ||
|
Eury
Sweden1126 Posts
On August 28 2013 18:14 Cele wrote: i think Kespa and other sc2 broadcasters in South Korea are running out of steam and interest in sc2. It's easier to outsource the streaming to other companies and to get new teams by opening the league rather than founding Team9. To me it reveals the decline of south korean sc2. Decline implies there ever was a peak. | ||
|
Kergy
Peru2011 Posts
On August 28 2013 18:14 Cele wrote: To me it reveals the decline of south korean sc2. more like the outstanding growth of Korean LoL these reforms are needed if they want the LoL Proleague to work out | ||
|
Charlie.Sheen
662 Posts
On August 28 2013 18:14 Cele wrote: i think Kespa and other sc2 broadcasters in South Korea are running out of steam and interest in sc2. It's easier to outsource the streaming to other companies and to get new teams by opening the league rather than founding Team9. To me it reveals the decline of south korean sc2. That's for sure, the only place sc2 is hot is Europe. I feel LoL is rescuing sc2 in Korea right now. | ||
|
Scarecrow
Korea (South)9172 Posts
On August 28 2013 18:08 Douillos wrote: And ESF fans? Will they cheer for... nobody? They were only ever useful labels for those who preferred GSL`s 1st generation players/teams (ESF) or those who followed the BW stars (Kespa). I don`t think many rooted for the governing organisations themselves. It`s all pretty mixed now anyway so this move should be good to bring the korean scene under 1 roof. | ||
opterown
Australia54748 Posts
of course there's a peak lolwat | ||
|
Eury
Sweden1126 Posts
Felt more like it was a downward slope into the abyss. | ||
|
Assirra
Belgium4169 Posts
On August 28 2013 18:14 Cele wrote: i think Kespa and other sc2 broadcasters in South Korea are running out of steam and interest in sc2. It's easier to outsource the streaming to other companies and to get new teams by opening the league rather than founding Team9. To me it reveals the decline of south korean sc2. You realize this is about waaay more then just sc2 right? | ||
|
TheBloodyDwarf
Finland7524 Posts
Bad for esf Good for korean esport Shortened: kespa will rule them all. | ||
Olli
Austria24416 Posts
On August 28 2013 18:19 Eury wrote: Felt more like it was a downward slope into the abyss. >_> Can't believe this forum still exists considering how dead a game we are | ||
|
XaCez
Sweden6991 Posts
On August 28 2013 18:25 DarkLordOlli wrote: >_> Can't believe this forum still exists considering how dead a game we are There's a difference between being dead and lacking popularity. | ||
|
hansonslee
United States2027 Posts
| ||
|
Scarecrow
Korea (South)9172 Posts
On August 28 2013 18:14 Cele wrote: i think Kespa and other sc2 broadcasters in South Korea are running out of steam and interest in sc2. It's easier to outsource the streaming to other companies and to get new teams by opening the league rather than founding Team9. To me it reveals the decline of south korean sc2. Kespa`s not a broadcaster and have always outsourced/used partners, like OGN, MBC, SPOtv and GOM. New teams with actual sponsors are also better than running another version of T8 out of existing sponsor`s pockets. Making up crap just to fit with your doomsday perspective doesn`t make it true. | ||
|
Sprouter
United States1724 Posts
| ||
|
macncheezeplz
United States93 Posts
| ||
|
Thrillz
4313 Posts
Everyone is kespa now, except a few foreign teams in korea. | ||
Destructicon
4713 Posts
Basically KeSPA when it was originally founded had the goal of unifying and supporting the eSports scene in all of South Korea, and providing fair opportunities to pro gamers as well as protecting their interests. When KeSPA became stubborn and refused to recognize SC2 and other titles as eSports then they failed in their original goals, they stopped serving the people and where serving their own interests. The joining fee also didn't help one damn bit. This new move meant to return KeSPA to its original goal of serving the people, protecting and supporting the players, the teams and the sponsoring companies. KeSPA doesn't lose much of its regulating power, its just that now all eSports teams in South Korea can join it and have a say in the decisions being made. This does however mean that the eSF in its current iteration no longer makes sense to exist, when all the GSTL teams and GOM join KeSPA then they will become part of it and will be involved in the decisions, so the need for eSF becomes null, but the interests of GOM and the current eSF are still being protected, which is a good thing. This overall is just great news, its a shinning step forward for Korea and, again is one of the reasons why they are still vastly ahead of the westerners in terms of acceptance and support for eSports. | ||
|
PerSe
United Kingdom550 Posts
On August 28 2013 18:34 macncheezeplz wrote: Purely from a spectator perspective, I have no problem Kespa taking over all ESF teams, YET if that happens what would happen to GOM's production? I feel GOM brings the most solid and consistent stream in SC2, I wouldn't want to see that disappear. GOM's production definitely wouldn't disappear under the structural changes. What you have to understand is that guys like OGN, GOMTV etc. are primarily broadcasting organisations, unlike Kespa which is basically a e-sports governing body. Kespa will be working in tandem with broadcasters. | ||
|
SystemXN
China105 Posts
| ||
| ||
