|
Ok Clarity is scum because posting a lot makes it seem like he is involved in the game but he isnt actually posting an opinion on anything. All he has done is criticize Deni and Chronicler and ask questions that really are not important. @Clarity, why does Djo's assumption that the party members are not disclosed have anything to do with the game?
|
Because scum and town think inherently different. To find the differences in thought and perspective you need those people to speak about their thought process. What better way than to ask them about their thought process?
|
On November 21 2012 23:09 Clarity_nl wrote: Oats, why do you assume people have a town read on me at all, let alone for activity? Why did you announce to me that you were making a case, instead of just making it? Do you actually believe I've tunneled Djo?
Good I like answering questions :D What I meant by makes people think is that the quick impression of someone posting a lot is indicative of town because scum like to stay out of the spotlight if there are other people taking the heat.
I announced that I was making a case in order to see your reaction. Why does it matter whether I announced or not? its not like I didnt deliver. Tunneling is the wrong word. Attacking is a better word I think I believe that after the co-host revealed information, you hopped on Djo and asked him irrelevant questions, again, in order to look townie.
|
I asked the question to djo after the host answered because Djo asked me to hold off until we had more info from the host. Do you believe that posting one liners is scummy? Did my reaction strengthen or weaken your read on me?
|
On November 21 2012 23:22 Clarity_nl wrote: I asked the question to djo after the host answered because Djo asked me to hold off until we had more info from the host. Do you believe that posting one liners is scummy? Did my reaction strengthen or weaken your read on me?
Your reaction didnt change my read. I believe that posting 1 liners that purely say OMGUS is scummy
|
On November 21 2012 22:52 Oatsmaster wrote: WHY I THINK CLARITY IS SCUM He justs posts 1-line comments throughout the whole chronicler incident.. the activity makes people think he is town but he doesnt actually take a stand, just criticized chronicler. Show nested quote +On November 21 2012 12:31 Clarity_nl wrote:On November 21 2012 12:29 TheChronicler wrote:On November 21 2012 12:27 Clarity_nl wrote:On November 21 2012 12:25 TheChronicler wrote:On November 21 2012 11:59 Oatsmaster wrote: random fluff post, Lotta Brazilians :O Useless. Don't post like this. On November 21 2012 12:14 Clarity_nl wrote: I do not have any kind of read on anyone yet. He would be a good choice because if he's scum it'll show comparatively to his town play. Who is he? I'm assuming Hapa. ---------------------------------------------- I'd like to be the party leader. I'm an unknown (hopefully) and no one will make stupid bullshit meta reads on the leader that would probably be worse than a coin flip. That's pretty much the only reason I want to lead. I don't even want to pick who will be the three on my team, which takes me to the next part of my pitch, and something I hope whoever is leader uses. If I'm leader I don't want to choose the three people with me. I want to choose three people to choose three people who will be on the team. They can choose themselves if they'd like. Why do this? Because it gets us more information. If I'm not chosen leader I'd like the person who IS chosen to implement this system. We still get information from who the leader chooses, AND we get information based upon who the three chosen people choose. What in the actual fuck. Sure it's information but it's information impossible to decipher. Odds are you'll hit a scum somewhere in your massive pit of chaos but how will you tell the difference between him and the townie who just happened to get it wrong. Scum will have to choose another person or risk showing their hand and causing the event to fail. Town can freely choose themselves since they know they'll only help with the event. Doesn't seem chaotic to me. Why is it seeming chaotic to you? Because you're throwing a second layer of wifom into the mix. Agrees with Hapa, and basically repeats what he and everyone else before said to sound like he is contributing. Show nested quote +On November 21 2012 12:44 Clarity_nl wrote: Quantity of information does not equal quality of information.
Moving on... I agree with hapa that the person we vote for has to be clear town, but not newbie town as they need to be strong analytically. Then with the Dienosore stuff, he again posts 1 liner’s criticizing deinosore.. Show nested quote +On November 21 2012 13:55 Clarity_nl wrote:On November 21 2012 13:53 Dienosore wrote: You sure are giving me an easy route to fly under the radar as long as I stay silly... There is a special place in hell for people like you. The last post with the Diensore actually being stupid, Clarity is asking for advice from town, no willing to take a stand on his own. Show nested quote +On November 21 2012 18:20 Clarity_nl wrote:On November 21 2012 18:14 Dienosore wrote:On November 21 2012 17:55 Clarity_nl wrote:On November 21 2012 17:34 Dienosore wrote: In an effort to gain your trust so that I can become the first leader, I have two solid scum reads that I feel need to be shared.
Djodref:
Supports sandroba, though he (weakly) nominated himself. Wants Clarity and Lamp on his team. Has asked a few times to different people what their reads are. Maybe mining for info? Said "I don't think it would be fair for the scum team not being able to kill the party members" Also, put out a hit on a town marv and town Hapa for being dangerous to the mafia. I'd say 80% sure he is scum
goodkarma:
Seems to be in favor of Sandroba for pres, even though he nominated himself for it. wants sandroba and promethelax on his team. Put emphasis on finding townies, not scummies, which could mean he is scum. Asked questions that feel as if they come from mafia perspective (dealing with towny death and kill immunity). Attacks back at Keirathi after he explains that we dont know HOW the scum kills by saying "scum must be able to remove it somehow" Uses distancing language "town" when talking about possible medics. I'm 70% sure he is scum. Seems to be town hunting.
Okay so you explained what both of them are doing but you have not explained why it is scummy. Djo is "mining info" and goodkarma is "town hunting". Both of which are perfectly reasonable ways to play this game as either alignment. Please don't drop random percentages, and stop posting that poster. It's less what they are doing, and more of HOW. I'm really good at reading language, like what verb tenses they are using or watching for specific pronoun connotations. For both of these guys, it feels very much to me like they are talking from a mafioso perspective, asking questions a scumlord would ask, etc... That being said, I am not 100% on any of my reads yet and don't really want to throw up any red herrings. All this is only based off of two pages of material. Give me another day or so (assuming these guys keep talking) and I'll have narrowed things down much better. They..... use certain verb tenses and pronoun connotations.....Asking questions a scumlord would ask? Can someone please give me a read on Dieno or tell me I should ignore him, I really want to move on from him but every time I think his idiocy stopped it returns with renewed ego. Keeps tunneling Diensore, an obvious target long after people stopped caring. Tunneling Djo on a minor issue about his assumptions. Show nested quote +On November 21 2012 22:19 Clarity_nl wrote: Why did you work under the assumption that party members chosen would not be disclosed. Seems rather counter-intuitive to me. Show nested quote +On November 21 2012 22:28 Clarity_nl wrote: I understand wanting to make sure, who wouldn't, but before the mod shared that info you were working under the assumption that party members chosen would not be disclosed, right? THIS IS WHY I THINK THAT CLARITY IS SCUM He does that as town on day 1. He just asks questions doesn't take positions. Null tell in my opinion
|
Eh. Well then you're going to hate this post. Your case is terrible.
|
On November 21 2012 20:45 Acrofales wrote:Show nested quote +On November 21 2012 19:29 risk.nuke wrote:On November 21 2012 10:51 Acrofales wrote:This is going to be so much fun. I finally made it into a greymist game I am going to go out and assume that Lavos will be a game element and not a player, seeing as he will be "summoned" later in the game. So I am going to assume that the quests are to get to Lavos, and get any town advantages we can on the way (somewhat similar to Resistance mafia). My suggestion is thus to play this just like resistance mafia. Everybody suggests the party they will make if chosen as leader today and gives their reasons. This should be done by 12 hours (or maybe 6, given that it's day 1 and people still need to get going) before the deadline, giving people time to vote on their preferred party leader. To get the discussion started, I would currently choose Marv, Sandro and Syllo along: I know them, I know Sandro and Syllo work well together, and I know they are all good players. I have no clue what the quest will be, so bringing the best players simply seems prudent. However, as the day goes on this may change if I get clear scum reads on any of them. For Sandro and Syllo I feel a scumread is viable in D1. I don't think I can get a read on Marv in D1, but he's still more readable than Toad, who I would otherwise put in that spot. Acrofales, can you elaborate why you immediately wanted to pick Sandroba, Marv, Syllo to go? What did you think would be the benefits and risks of sending three of our best players? Not reading the thread already? I was under the impression (and still expect it to be a very real possibility), that a successful mission will give the party members benefits (items, mason chat, a level up, whatever) that will help us root out mafia and/or directly aid us in fighting Lavos. The best players in the game are naturally the best equipped to use such perks. That is, if they're town. Sandro brought up a good counterargument, and making scum choose between shooting likely party members and shooting experienced town players is a good policy. On that note, @Sandro: you have not explained why this policy is pretty much the complete opposite of your proposal in Holy Roman, where you (a veteran and likely target for scum kp) wanted yourself as emperor (and thus a likely target for scum kp) precisely because you are an experienced player. On a similar note, if we follow that logic through, Sandro should not be party leader. No I read your arguments, but they sounded inadequate and non thought through. What really rubbed me the wrong way was your disregard for individual alignment amongst your list. Right now I feel you didn't care, you just wanted an elite team to go under the pretext that they would be best equipped. You purposefully ignored or didn't consider the risks of a team like that and I really don't like that.
On November 21 2012 21:09 syllogism wrote:Show nested quote +On November 21 2012 18:13 Keirathi wrote: Syllogism/sandroba:
You guys have ignored us, but what do you think of Toads reasoning for me being scum? Do you think I'm scum?
What about Deinos 2 scum reads and 2 town reads? Agree or disagree with any of them? I think his reasoning is weak and your subsequent posts in which you attract more attention towards the fact that someone thinks you are mafia are fairly towny. I do not like your marv or no "vet" as a leader strategy at all, however. Show nested quote +On November 21 2012 18:34 risk.nuke wrote: Hi, I'd proposed myself to lead the party since I feel I possess the essential quality's we'd want for a mission leader. But I feel I'm late to sign myself up and as it stands there already is already a candidate I want to support. As it stands right now I want Sandroba for our first party leader.
No disrespect to marv who's one of the best scumhunters I know on these forums but a scumhunter isn't what we need today.
I'm not sure how missions are going to work but to prepare for anything these quality's are what we seak. We need a player who's smart, adaptable to new situations and capable of finding the optimal play. We need a player who's good at analysing behaviour and who's good at finding townies.
This is Sandroba in a nutshell. I've seen firsthand how he think and he is one of the few people I've met I trust can identify the correct play in a new situation. In SS mafia he created and executed the plan that dismantled the mafiateam in a day. Furthermore from my experience Sandroba's greatest strength is finding townies and then scum by process of elimination.
Additionally his activity is promising and I have a pretty good insight of how he plays. ##Vote: Sandroba Perhaps I'm reading too much into this as being transparent when justifying your party leader vote is good, but this seems overly explanatory. I don't understand what's the point of mentioning that you were going to propose yourself nor why there was a need to mention marv at all (as a side note, I'm surprised that you hold him in this high regard; it's not something I'm used to hearing from you). One motive for saying that you intended to propose yourself could be that townies are "expected" to nominate themselves. The focus of the post is less on what Sandroba has done in this game and more on his general strengths. I'm used to a more direct risk nuke. I agree with your suspicions on acrofales, however. Well the reason I said I would had proposed myself was because if I had been here when the game had started I would had. When I first saw the day1 post I wanted to nominate myself but I decided I'd read through the whole thread first and when I had It no longer seemed viable. It was just part of my thought process. As for Marv, Marv is a player who've lately impressed me with his scumhuntingskills. However that wasn't the reason I mentioned him. The reason I brought him up is a lot of the players in this game does not know you or sandroba. To them Marv is more real then you which I felt caused a very biased support for him amongst the newer players. Which is also entwined with why I gave pretty detailed reasoning about Sandroba.
|
also its a null tell because he is well aware of it now. Aren't we clarity?
|
LOL why would you say that the case is good? Marv, goodkarma, other people who were in this thread a moment ago. I would like your opinons on this case?
|
On November 21 2012 23:27 iamperfection wrote:also its a null tell because he is well aware of it now. Aren't we clarity?
I like my day 1 play, I see no reason to change it. Marv and zbo both had town reads on me last game.
|
I dont like using meta reads because it could be inaccurate.. It also rely's a lot on experience of the game which I dont have.
|
On November 21 2012 23:29 Clarity_nl wrote:Show nested quote +On November 21 2012 23:27 iamperfection wrote:also its a null tell because he is well aware of it now. Aren't we clarity? I like my day 1 play, I see no reason to change it. Marv and zbo both had town reads on me last game.
I really do not think that your day 1 play in this game is helpful to town.. It may result in town reads but if it doesnt help town, its useless if you get killed early
|
On November 21 2012 23:31 Oatsmaster wrote: I dont like using meta reads because it could be inaccurate.. It also rely's a lot on experience of the game which I dont have.
im just providing an alternative explanation i dont think you can say Clarity is definitely scum regarding his actions so far.
|
United Kingdom36156 Posts
On November 21 2012 23:29 Clarity_nl wrote:Show nested quote +On November 21 2012 23:27 iamperfection wrote:also its a null tell because he is well aware of it now. Aren't we clarity? I like my day 1 play, I see no reason to change it. Marv and zbo both had town reads on me last game.
Indeed, you were pretty clearly town. For my read on you I'm waiting to see how constructive you are this cycle. So far, not so much.
|
On November 21 2012 23:29 Oatsmaster wrote: LOL why would you say that the case is good? Marv, goodkarma, other people who were in this thread a moment ago. I would like your opinons on this case?
I think that Clarity is looking like its usual townie self... I thought that you were following the Mario game. Clarity was town in this game and his D1 play was just the same as it is right now. So, I would wait for him to produce more serious contributions before looking further on him. Slight town read on him for the moment.
|
@ marv
i should be on the team right.
|
Yeah I kinda got hung up on dieno too long. Blows my mind how some people think.
|
Anyone want to say how Clarity acts when he is scum? Djo/iamp/marv?
|
United Kingdom36156 Posts
On November 21 2012 23:34 iamperfection wrote: @ marv
i should be on the team right.
you sure do love fishing for people's opinions on your alignment I'd say you were probably town at the moment, but I'm not certain yet.
|
|
|
|