EPTChrono Trigger Mafia - Page 33
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Acrofales
Spain17993 Posts
| ||
|
sandroba
Canada4998 Posts
| ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On November 21 2012 22:50 sandroba wrote: I wouldn't mind syllo being leader either and if I win I will give him veto power over the people I choose. I'm fairly certain he is town at this point. what distinguishes a town syllo from a scum syllo in your opinion? | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
He justs posts 1-line comments throughout the whole chronicler incident.. the activity makes people think he is town but he doesnt actually take a stand, just criticized chronicler. On November 21 2012 12:31 Clarity_nl wrote: Because you're throwing a second layer of wifom into the mix. Agrees with Hapa, and basically repeats what he and everyone else before said to sound like he is contributing. On November 21 2012 12:44 Clarity_nl wrote: Quantity of information does not equal quality of information. Moving on... I agree with hapa that the person we vote for has to be clear town, but not newbie town as they need to be strong analytically. Then with the Dienosore stuff, he again posts 1 liner’s criticizing deinosore.. On November 21 2012 13:55 Clarity_nl wrote: There is a special place in hell for people like you. The last post with the Diensore actually being stupid, Clarity is asking for advice from town, no willing to take a stand on his own. On November 21 2012 18:20 Clarity_nl wrote: They..... use certain verb tenses and pronoun connotations.....Asking questions a scumlord would ask? Can someone please give me a read on Dieno or tell me I should ignore him, I really want to move on from him but every time I think his idiocy stopped it returns with renewed ego. Keeps tunneling Diensore, an obvious target long after people stopped caring. Tunneling Djo on a minor issue about his assumptions. On November 21 2012 22:19 Clarity_nl wrote: Why did you work under the assumption that party members chosen would not be disclosed. Seems rather counter-intuitive to me. On November 21 2012 22:28 Clarity_nl wrote: I understand wanting to make sure, who wouldn't, but before the mod shared that info you were working under the assumption that party members chosen would not be disclosed, right? THIS IS WHY I THINK THAT CLARITY IS SCUM | ||
|
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
On November 21 2012 11:01 Promethelax wrote: I see Acro has sniped me in terms of the idea of any potential leader posting their core group. Has anyone played in a similar set-up before? Or does anyone have the link to Resistance? I haven't read it. Based on the fact that Acro had the same though as me and from our last game together I would currently, put him in my team, along with Acro I would add Marv (come on, wouldn't you?) and as third player I would chose Hapa. Hapa is a guy who over many games I have come to like and respect though I once hated him. He is a great town player and a kinda crappy scum player, seems like the right guy to have along for the ride. TL:DR My team: Acro, Marv, Hapa I'm curious if putting one player who seems like a liability (one of the guys known for trolling or one of the smurfs) onto the team so that we can get a read on them from their actions makes sense? It seems like we won't have lynches but knowing who scum is/is not will help town players direct any and all actions which they have and i assume making sure that non-town players not being on the quest team will be a good thing for us as the OP specifies that they can make it more difficult to achieve our objectives. I actually really like the bolded idea, especially if the party leader explicitly says which of their party they're picking as the "liability" and why. Personally, I think this could be a good way to get reads on people like Marv and Toad who are notoriously hard to pin down. fyi to the thread, I'm supposed to be at work in ten minutes (lol) but I'll be reading through the thread as the afternoon goes on and I'll be posting my reactions to things I see like this. | ||
|
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
On November 21 2012 11:03 Clarity_nl wrote: I'm reading up on resistance mafia, as it was said the setups might be simillar in some ways and I'm not familiar with it. Just got lynched in my other game so can focus on this starting tomorrow. I nominate myself as our heroic leader because almost everyone here doesn't know me. That way you won't be fooled by people playing wifom games with their meta! this is probably a joke/troll post but if he's serious this is some terrible logic | ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
| ||
|
sandroba
Canada4998 Posts
On November 21 2012 22:51 marvellosity wrote: what distinguishes a town syllo from a scum syllo in your opinion? He is way less conflict enticing / questions asking as scum and just chillax and agrees with people that are the right track. This game he says he will be lazy, but isn't and is activily doing shit left and right. So yeah. | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
The reason why we do not want to do this at this stage is because, All we know of the events are that the hidden number values that every player has will be used to complete/fail the event. They will not actually do anything to complete the event, at least to my knowledge. On day 1, our priority should be to complete the event and to do that, the party leader should take the 3 towniest players. | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
| ||
|
Clarity_nl
Netherlands6826 Posts
On November 21 2012 22:54 strongandbig wrote: this is probably a joke/troll post but if he's serious this is some terrible logic It was a joke/low blow at someone who posted something similar, saying that because we don't know him there's no meta and that's a good reason. | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
| ||
|
Clarity_nl
Netherlands6826 Posts
| ||
|
Clarity_nl
Netherlands6826 Posts
On November 21 2012 23:01 Oatsmaster wrote: The comments are above the quotes :D Yes, but you accuse me of sheeping hapa when I end the conversation with "quantity of information is not quality of information" Which is what I basically said just before. | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On November 21 2012 23:01 Oatsmaster wrote: The comments are above the quotes :D maybe clarity is scum, maybe he isn't, but all your case was was providing a commentary without showing why it applied to one alignment over another. | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
What I meant by take a stand was to suggest what was bad with the case and how to improve it, not actually a town/scum read. clear town, but not newbie town as they need to be strong analytically. Come on, everyone already said that the leader needs to be strong in reads, why repeat it? | ||
|
Clarity_nl
Netherlands6826 Posts
| ||
|
iamperfection
United States9642 Posts
On November 21 2012 14:12 TheChronicler wrote: It's anti-town to give scum information they can use. You just told scum your town read (assuming you're town). Now scum will value killing your town read higher than they would have. Way to go. COOL STORY | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
| ||
|
Clarity_nl
Netherlands6826 Posts
Why did you announce to me that you were making a case, instead of just making it? Do you actually believe I've tunneled Djo? | ||
| ||
