BC's Arkham City - Page 58
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
rgTheSchworz
Romania425 Posts
| ||
Slardar
Canada7593 Posts
On February 09 2012 04:02 Jackal58 wrote: Since over half the people in this game and perhaps as many as 2/3s are aware of the "other" forum as you put it and since BM felt compelled to tell the entire game about it allow me to verify that the other forum does indeed exist. It's a QT created by BC. In that QT there are 13 players other than myself. They are there because I invited them. Not everybody that has received an invite has posted in it. Most have. But not all. There is no significant activity level difference between those that avail themselves of it and their activity in the game thread. There is no discussion going on in it that has not occurred here. The level of profanity may be a bit higher. The level of insults may be a tad greater as well. I haven't tried to quantify it. I had to send out invites prior to the end of day 1. I would have preferred to wait til the end of night 1 but that's not my call. 11 of the people I chose are all people I have played a multitude of times with. They are also for the most part all people that I hold in high regard for their ability to play this game. I chose 2 others at random towards the end of the day. If you did not get an invite don't take it personally. I reworked my list several times in order to get what I saw as a group of people that could eventually all work towards a common goal. I am well aware that this cannot happen on day one. For rest assured there is without any doubt members of the scum team in there. However this circle remains active even in the event of my death. So I chose who I felt would eventually give town the greatest chance of winning. 1 Bill Murray 2 Hiro Protagonist 3 Doctor Helvetica 4 Risk.nuke 5 Opz 6 Kitaman27 7 forumite 8 Radfield 9 Palmar 10 Chaoser 11 Wherebugsgo 12 Tyran 13 evantrees Keep your friends close. Keep your enemies closer. Sorry guys, but what the fuck is going on in here? There is a rule which disallows PMing, which is the equivalent of barring outside discussion. The only people who are allowed to have a "meeting" is scum. Is this or is this not correct? Either way just having a secret circle and pretending its a "mason circle" is bullshit. I want out of the game if this is not against the rules. Straight up. "PMs PMs are not allowed in this game unless a role states otherwise." | ||
Tyrran
France777 Posts
On February 09 2012 05:52 rgTheSchworz wrote: Ok people, I am gonna announce something. Who else has claimed apart from Kurumi, Toad, BM and me? Palmar claimed to be mason with toad. Toad says he has no idea what plamar is talking about. | ||
rgTheSchworz
Romania425 Posts
| ||
Toadesstern
Germany16350 Posts
On February 09 2012 05:52 rgTheSchworz wrote: Ok people, I am gonna announce something. Who else has claimed apart from Kurumi, Toad, BM and me? we don't need more annoucements before tomorrow, thx | ||
Tyrran
France777 Posts
On February 09 2012 05:57 rgTheSchworz wrote: And QT thing is legal and real? QT thing is real. It was created using a Role. | ||
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
| ||
Forumite
Sweden3280 Posts
On February 09 2012 05:57 rgTheSchworz wrote: And QT thing is legal and real? I was sent the link by BC, so I should think it is legal. | ||
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
"PMs PMs are not allowed in this game unless a role states otherwise." We're not pming...it's an ability of a role. There are games where PMs aren't allowed but have masons as roles. | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
On February 09 2012 05:57 rgTheSchworz wrote: And QT thing is legal and real? if it wasn't there would be a large # of modkills at this point. | ||
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
| ||
rgTheSchworz
Romania425 Posts
I am Two-Face the Detective. I can Investigate someone and get in addition of guilty/not guilty the fact that I can survive vigi shots. | ||
Toadesstern
Germany16350 Posts
| ||
Palmar
Iceland22630 Posts
| ||
Tyrran
France777 Posts
| ||
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
| ||
Toadesstern
Germany16350 Posts
| ||
layabout
United Kingdom2600 Posts
Lurkers are hard to read by nature as they do not produce content that can be analysed. Players that provide content can be more easily analysed, and can be more easily read. (which some exceptions) Because of this it is likely that players that shoot based off of their reads will be shooting into active players. (mainly 3rd party and vig's). Scum are unlikey to kill lurkers because town players that lurk are (generally) less threatening to scum than town players that try to contribute. We need to be weary of only focusing on/only firing into active players especially as we seem to have outed quite a number of our power roles and we cannot rely on them living for very long. Don't shoot into the active players unless you have a strong read, you can make a better decision later on. | ||
Toadesstern
Germany16350 Posts
| ||
Palmar
Iceland22630 Posts
| ||
| ||