EPTBut I'll be honest, haha I don't really see much point in doing all this. Well unless you like math and have the time to do it which I can understand as I love math. Its Ok, I just found it funny how well formatted all of this is as if it was for a research paper
Do you macro like a pro? - Page 3
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
windsupernova
Mexico5280 Posts
But I'll be honest, haha I don't really see much point in doing all this. Well unless you like math and have the time to do it which I can understand as I love math. Its Ok, I just found it funny how well formatted all of this is as if it was for a research paper | ||
|
Goggalor
United States310 Posts
| ||
|
Cofo
United States1388 Posts
| ||
|
templar rage
United States2509 Posts
On September 17 2011 01:32 butchji wrote: The Spending Quotient isn't as important for Zergs though? Zergs can mass larvae without spending the money - like when you save 1000 mins 1000 gas to instantly spawn 10 mutalisks as the spire finishes. He covered this towards the end, saying that the SQ is "insensitive to strategic factors", such as stockpiling resources. It's just a model that can be used to compare macro between leagues in a general sense. Numerous times throughout the post, the OP mentions that differences may occur due to strategic choices. It was an interesting read. I'll be sure to try it myself when I get home. | ||
|
Cain0
United Kingdom608 Posts
On September 17 2011 01:18 crystyxn wrote: lol @ Idra having his own league Ha, I know, its not as if he's a little bit ahead of the rest of Grandmasters, he's a whole league ahead. Just when I thought that all GM's had perfect macro, I read this. Also, this is by far the most epic post I have ever read on TL, I can't imagine what your 1000th post will be like if this is only your 500th. It is really unbelieveable how much effort you have put into this. Brilliant Stuff! | ||
|
SwizzY
United States1549 Posts
Bravo man. Really interesting stuff. | ||
|
tnud
Sweden2233 Posts
On September 17 2011 01:37 Agh wrote: while I know it was done for fun, your dats is not as useful as it could be. Your conclusions need to be separated for each race. P and Z average unspent will be much higher than T. http://i.imgur.com/6jUUQ.png ? Seems like protoss is the worst at this (in this sample size). Mass warpin ftw | ||
|
Lafer
United States114 Posts
| ||
|
the p00n
Netherlands615 Posts
| ||
|
tarpman
Canada717 Posts
On September 17 2011 01:29 ZaaaaaM wrote: Rofl at the zerg getting up to 160 drones haha My understanding is that's how many workers he built, not how many he had at any one time. So, he probably lost a whole lot and had to rebuild them. | ||
|
Poo
Canada536 Posts
| ||
|
Tigi
Germany472 Posts
| ||
|
Bojas
Netherlands2397 Posts
Thanks allot for this  . imo this deserves a forum star or some other reward. | ||
|
d_wAy
United States104 Posts
I'm not exactly sure what I've learned from the OP but I am sure as hell enjoying the multiple nerdgasms I'm having as a Maths major. | ||
|
imPERSONater
United States1324 Posts
| ||
|
julianto
2292 Posts
| ||
|
dave333
United States915 Posts
| ||
|
Oldfool
Australia394 Posts
| ||
|
ZXRP
South Africa114 Posts
I know that quite a bit of work must have gone into the above calculations, and I take my hat off to you sir. With some community pressure, we may even be able to get Blizzard to add SQ to the data available post-game (saving some of the less mathematically inclined from doing so themselves). At the very least, some popular SC2 replay archive programs should consider adding this to the data they extract from the replay file. | ||
|
QTIP.
United States2113 Posts
| ||
| ||
