| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
TheSwamp
United States1497 Posts
On June 17 2012 01:04 freakhill wrote: This severely needs to be refreshed. I'm bronze-silver and my SQ varies between 55 and 90 in 20mn+ games. (SQ 90 being the only game i managed to win TvP) Edit: nvm | ||
|
Sheet
Sweden2 Posts
| ||
|
Joka
Sweden27 Posts
 | ||
|
Di3s3l
97 Posts
| ||
|
iremnant3847
Taiwan269 Posts
Great work! I look forward to more of your threads! | ||
|
-Switch-
Canada506 Posts
| ||
|
Relevant
United States63 Posts
| ||
|
Forsy
Canada36 Posts
On July 10 2012 03:26 Joka wrote: So... any volunteers to make an updated SQ-scale? EDIT: Based on that SQ report from last year, the original scale still works well with Protoss. Terran I think could be moved up +25 at every league, while Z could be moved up +30 (5 more than terran). If the players have improved macro since then, then each race/league would probably move up another 5 or 10pts. Z T P Bronze 69 64 39 Silver 78 73 48 Gold 82 77 52 Platinum 88 83 58 Diamond 95 90 65 Master 102 97 72 GM 112 107 82 Koreans 122 117 92 Limit 137 132 107 | ||
|
ElizarTringov
Bulgaria317 Posts
| ||
|
ScienceNotBusiness
United States91 Posts
| ||
|
AnachronisticAnarchy
United States2957 Posts
| ||
|
IronyDK
Denmark142 Posts
| ||
|
chris5180
198 Posts
| ||
|
INTENZ-_-
Sweden137 Posts
| ||
|
ExoTau
Canada67 Posts
On July 31 2012 01:51 Relevant wrote: Nooby scrub question: where do you get the data? I went to match history in bnet, but I can't click on any games... -On the game summary screen, click the second tab: Economy Breakdown. -Use the UNSPENT and RESSOURCE COLLECTION RATE to plug in the formula. | ||
|
Natespank
Canada449 Posts
| ||
|
Hordeon
Lithuania72 Posts
![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/Q5ZCO.jpg) My spending quotient (SQ is: 91) Lol, the funniest thing is that I'm not even GM. But TOP25 Master. | ||
|
ZackAttack
United States884 Posts
Do the charts account for the fact that GrandMaster and Master players lose a lot more workers because they play Grandmaster and Master players harass a lot more than Bronze-Diamond? I think that is a pretty important factor, because of course a bronze player is going to drop off at a certain point because he is not being harrased and does not need to make more workers, while a masters player can get harrased and would need to make additional workers. A bronze player will never lose because he makes too many workers. | ||
|
StarGalaxy
Germany744 Posts
On September 23 2012 06:26 Hordeon wrote: My spending quotient (SQ is: 91) Lol, the funniest thing is that I'm not even GM. But TOP25 Master. sick, i am also high master but with only around 80 SQ. | ||
|
nanoscorp
United States1237 Posts
On September 23 2012 06:39 ZackAttack wrote: A bronze player will never lose because he makes too many workers. What? Played zerg vs 4-gate? I'd wager that smooth macro in bronze league isn't enough to guarantee a win if you're up against an early timing attack. There are a lot of aggressive 1-base all-ins that aren't too hard to execute (ie Bronze can probably hit within 15-20s of a Diamond or higher) and can grab a quick win against heavy econ play. I think a better way to put it would be: until you go all-in or your opponent does, don't cut workers, they'll pay off sooner than you think. Lower league players may have less total opportunity for worker production due to a prevalence of 1-base attacks, but their average game length should be shorter as well. | ||
| ||
StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Dota 2 Counter-Strike Heroes of the Storm Other Games |
|
RSL Revival
Clem vs Classic
SHIN vs Cure
FEL
WardiTV European League
BSL: ProLeague
Dewalt vs Bonyth
Replay Cast
Sparkling Tuna Cup
WardiTV European League
The PondCast
Replay Cast
RSL Revival
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
