EPTDo you macro like a pro? - Page 60
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
Dontkillme
Korea (South)806 Posts
| ||
|
Arvd
England54 Posts
On June 04 2012 00:50 Dontkillme wrote: What is up with the players or the game where someone made over 160 workers by the 20 min mark :s At higher levels of gameplay the game used to have tonnes of more effective harass than now-a-days so it was not rare in later games for 60+ workers to die and zerg liked their 100 workers ^^ I don't think you will see that many worker kills recently but that is probably why so many workers were made in that game :D Ps: Anyone willing to bet that that was Ret? :D | ||
|
Kaitokid
Germany1327 Posts
On June 04 2012 00:26 NVRLand wrote: I feel that there is something weird with this. I got an avg SQ of 70 (Lowest 54, highest 85) and I find this very hard to believe since it would be equivelent to high master while I am top gold (facing platinum players time to time). I calculated the stats from my last 10 games which had an avg. income of 650+ (Only one game was below 1100 tho). Really impressive work tho! Kudos to you for doing this! average income of 650+ but only 1 game was below 1100? | ||
|
NVRLand
Sweden203 Posts
On June 04 2012 00:56 Kaitokid wrote: average income of 650+ but only 1 game was below 1100? I chose only the games where the avg income was 650 or higher (for each game) | ||
|
Xenocryst
United States521 Posts
| ||
|
_NIx_
United States49 Posts
| ||
|
MooseMasher
Sweden42 Posts
Does that make me a retard when it comes to decision-making?  | ||
|
las91
United States5080 Posts
| ||
|
OneBaseKing
Afghanistan412 Posts
On June 06 2012 07:14 MooseMasher wrote: I get 100+ consistently and I'm low masters Does that make me a retard when it comes to decision-making? I'm in same shoes man, my macro is GM level but I'm low masters. Yeah, it's probably decision-making | ||
|
Bumbler
Germany10 Posts
But I'm just mid master. I think that pros are constantly beyond 100 nowadays and decision-making has become more important then macro. | ||
|
freakhill
Japan463 Posts
| ||
|
Abenson
Canada4122 Posts
| ||
|
Allscorpion
United Kingdom319 Posts
| ||
|
asdir
Germany39 Posts
If you still have the data, do you mind if I take a look and try my luck? | ||
SuperMario
United States1 Post
Edit;typo | ||
|
Scheme
United Kingdom210 Posts
Maybe if you set up some sort of way to upload excel spreadsheet with the data and peoples Battle.net profile you would be able to confirm/revise your formula. | ||
|
PauseBreak
United States270 Posts
This thread is great! And has a lot of hard work in it. For someone who is having a good time in Bronze or Silver (winning most of their games) but can't seem to get out of the lower tier leagues, its probably because they SQ is low and they need to find a way to macro more effectiently. I think that's the key for those situations? Correct me if I'm wrong. | ||
|
Orracle
United States314 Posts
I tend to have 90-110 in my 20 minute+ games. | ||
|
PersonDudeGuy
Canada47 Posts
| ||
|
Recognizable
Netherlands1552 Posts
On June 25 2012 04:38 PersonDudeGuy wrote: Jesus so does that mean that the difference between top masters and low diamond is the difference between GM and masters at least in terms of macro? Difference between GM and low/mid is much higher than Top masters and low diamond in my opinion. When you are high master the mistakes you make and what you have to improve is much, much less clear than in let's say low diamond. | ||
| ||
