EPTThe Automated Ban List - Page 1068
| Forum Index > TL Community |
This thread is for discussing recent bans. Don't discuss other topics here. Take it to website feedback if you disagree with a ban or want to raise an issue. Keep it civil. NOTE: For those of you who want to find the actual ABL thread where the bans are posted. Please look in here: https://tl.net/forum/closed-threads/ | ||
|
TheToast
United States4808 Posts
| ||
|
solidbebe
Netherlands4921 Posts
On May 11 2012 06:17 JackDragon wrote: Hmm I wonder if that is another GG.NoRe account. The split personality fitts anyway. But then again Southwards seams to be more of a sc2 guy. He writes off as Tim South in some posts so I doubt it's a GG.NoRe alias. | ||
|
neoghaleon55
United States7435 Posts
On May 11 2012 05:45 JOJOsc2news wrote: Split personality or extremely confused individual. How did you spot that one HPig? Edit: Just saw his other warned posts etc. Idiotic. Wow...posts like that...wrong on many levels. 2 days seems pretty merciful, should have been banned at least a week for being 1. a hypocrite 2. a liar | ||
|
JackDragon
525 Posts
On May 11 2012 06:26 solidbebe wrote: He writes off as Tim South in some posts so I doubt it's a GG.NoRe alias. Well that is if Tim South is a real person. Split personalies can have their own name  . But I think you are right. | ||
p4NDemik
United States13896 Posts
| ||
|
JackDragon
525 Posts
| ||
|
solidbebe
Netherlands4921 Posts
On May 11 2012 07:02 p4NDemik wrote: If it was another GG.NoRe account it would be permed. How long would it take before a PBU account wouldn't get instabanned again? A year? 2? | ||
|
p4NDemik
United States13896 Posts
| ||
|
Anacletus
United States733 Posts
On May 11 2012 07:21 p4NDemik wrote: Depends entirely on the user in question. Have you ever considered not banning GGnoRE if/when he make another account just to watch him and see what he does? It would be like a science experiment, putting him under a microscope. | ||
|
p4NDemik
United States13896 Posts
| ||
|
Anacletus
United States733 Posts
On May 11 2012 07:27 Anacletus wrote: Have you ever considered not banning GGnoRE if/when he make another account just to watch him and see what he does? It would be like a science experiment, putting him under a microscope. On May 11 2012 07:28 p4NDemik wrote: No. Sorry, I was entirely joking - it was just a poor joke. I just imagined a ridiculous scenario in my mind, something like a reverse 1984. Something where everyone knows who he is and just goes about their ways as he continues to go about his trolly routine. Yeah, if I try to make jokes I'll try to not make them suck from now on  | ||
|
beetlelisk
Poland2276 Posts
On May 11 2012 07:28 p4NDemik wrote: No. p4NDemik do you mind answering some questions about the banning system? Like recently you would say how many bans come from "hunts" and how many from reports? I don't think that answering this would show you relying on reports or you getting lazy or anything if that thought pops in your mind, isn't it all about the regular users of the community fighting alongside mods, which results in the community maturing further for the well being of all of us? 2nd question do you have the report threads section divided in "reports from general forum", "report from LR threads" and so on or is it all in one place? 3rd q is about how many successful reports does it take to become a banling? Is it a set in stone number, or some average successful reports per time or does the number of reports is shortened or lengthened by the attitude of the user submitting reports? In similar way I guess writing insightful threads/posts in the subforum from where most reports come from results in Admins recruiting a user to become a banling? Like Excalibur_Z for example. 4th how many of people with banhammer are girls? I know there is at least one... Who exactly decides if a user become a banling? | ||
|
Praetorial
United States4241 Posts
The LoL subforum has Neo, who's in charge of D3? Just wondering. | ||
|
beetlelisk
Poland2276 Posts
On May 11 2012 07:37 Anacletus wrote: Sorry, I was entirely joking - it was just a poor joke. I just imagined a ridiculous scenario in my mind, something like a reverse 1984. Something where everyone knows who he is and just goes about their ways as he continues to go about his trolly routine. Yeah, if I try to make jokes I'll try to not make them suck from now on Don't worry too much, this thread is all about enjoying bans in a way... well for a big part at least I guess. Maybe idea of toying with users no matter who they are was a bit over the boundaries but I think many of us would like to do that to assholes. | ||
|
JOJOsc2news
3000 Posts
On May 11 2012 07:50 beetlelisk wrote: p4NDemik do you mind answering some questions about the banning system? Like recently you would say how many bans come from "hunts" and how many from reports? I don't think that answering this would show you relying on reports or you getting lazy or anything if that thought pops in your mind, isn't it all about the regular users of the community fighting alongside mods, which results in the community maturing further for the well being of all of us? 2nd question do you have the report threads section divided in "reports from general forum", "report from LR threads" and so on or is it all in one place? 3rd q is about how many successful reports does it take to become a banling? Is it a set in stone number, or some average successful reports per time or does the number of reports is shortened or lengthened by the attitude of the user submitting reports? In similar way I guess writing insightful threads/posts in the subforum from where most reports come from results in Admins recruiting a user to become a banling? Like Excalibur_Z for example. 4th how many of people with banhammer are girls? I know there is at least one... Who exactly decides if a user become a banling? When I interviewed p4NDemik, I think he said that most of the bans come from reports. But we had some really hot topic threads lately and I would assume that those were constantly watched by mods. | ||
|
beetlelisk
Poland2276 Posts
On May 11 2012 08:20 JOJOsc2news wrote: When I interviewed p4NDemik, I think he said that most of the bans come from reports. But we had some really hot topic threads lately and I would assume that those were constantly watched by mods. kk thanks well I guess we can get an update now. Where can i find the interview? | ||
|
p4NDemik
United States13896 Posts
On May 11 2012 07:50 beetlelisk wrote: p4NDemik do you mind answering some questions about the banning system? Like recently you would say how many bans come from "hunts" and how many from reports? I don't think that answering this would show you relying on reports or you getting lazy or anything if that thought pops in your mind, isn't it all about the regular users of the community fighting alongside mods, which results in the community maturing further for the well being of all of us? 2nd question do you have the report threads section divided in "reports from general forum", "report from LR threads" and so on or is it all in one place? 3rd q is about how many successful reports does it take to become a banling? Is it a set in stone number, or some average successful reports per time or does the number of reports is shortened or lengthened by the attitude of the user submitting reports? In similar way I guess writing insightful threads/posts in the subforum from where most reports come from results in Admins recruiting a user to become a banling? Like Excalibur_Z for example. 4th how many of people with banhammer are girls? I know there is at least one... Who exactly decides if a user become a banling? 1) I wouldn't call the alternative to reports "hunts" really, it usually just comes down to moderating a thread you frequent very often. Like the GoT or TWD threads for me. I'm reading them so I'll enforce the rules while I'm at it. Because of the quantity of reports I typically go through in a week I'd say I average far more warnings/bans from reports than from my regular reading habits. Mainly because I simply do not read debates at length in SC2 threads, LR threads, etc and many times these are the threads where huge quantities of offenders reside. I suppose "hunt" is appropriate when there are malicious users out there and IP matching comes into play, but that is an even lower percentage of the total # of bans for me personally. 2) All in one place. Title of the report varies depending on the forum / reported poster, but they all end up in the same forum. 3) There is no set number of successful reports that gains staff's attention when someone is looking to add a banling. Composing good posts, being able to maintain a calm demeanor while participating in debates, and just generally being a high quality poster and contributor goes a lot farther towards getting noticed. 4) 1 - Haemonculus 5?) No one in particular, someone just nominates a user and then Reds discuss the nominee until a decision is reached. | ||
|
turdburgler
England6749 Posts
On May 11 2012 08:53 p4NDemik wrote: 4) 1 - Haemonculus ruining the 'ares is the female mod' joke is worse than killing esports | ||
|
kerpal
United Kingdom2695 Posts
On May 11 2012 08:53 p4NDemik wrote: 1) I wouldn't call the alternative to reports "hunts" really, it usually just comes down to moderating a thread you frequent very often. Like the GoT or TWD threads for me. I'm reading them so I'll enforce the rules while I'm at it. Because of the quantity of reports I typically go through in a week I'd say I average far more warnings/bans from reports than from my regular reading habits. Mainly because I simply do not read debates at length in SC2 threads, LR threads, etc and many times these are the threads where huge quantities of offenders reside. I suppose "hunt" is appropriate when there are malicious users out there and IP matching comes into play, but that is an even lower percentage of the total # of bans for me personally. 2) All in one place. Title of the report varies depending on the forum / reported poster, but they all end up in the same forum. 3) There is no set number of successful reports that gains staff's attention when someone is looking to add a banling. Composing good posts, being able to maintain a calm demeanor while participating in debates, and just generally being a high quality poster and contributor goes a lot farther towards getting noticed. 4) 1 - Haemonculus 5?) No one in particular, someone just nominates a user and then Reds discuss the nominee until a decision is reached. what about website feedback threads? are those watched specifically? | ||
|
p4NDemik
United States13896 Posts
edit: yeah ... ares is the 2nd lesser known female mod. easily forgotten. | ||
| ||
