• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 18:51
CEST 00:51
KST 07:51
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
ByuL, and the Limitations of Standard Play2Team Liquid Map Contest #22: Results and Winners7Code S Season 2 (2026): RO4 and Finals Preview12TL.net Map Contest #22 - Voting & Ladder Map Selection7Code S Season 2 (2026) - RO8 Preview8
Community News
MC vs IdrA, Boxer vs Nal_rA to be Legacy Matches @ BlizzCon55.0.16 Hotfix (June 30) - Balance + Bug Fixes9Weekly Cups (June 22-28): Zergs thrive in new patch2[TLMC] Summer 2026 Ladder Map Rotation05.0.16 patch for SC2 goes live (8 worker start)98
StarCraft 2
General
5.0.16 Hotfix (June 30) - Balance + Bug Fixes MC vs IdrA, Boxer vs Nal_rA to be Legacy Matches @ BlizzCon 5.0.16 patch for SC2 goes live (8 worker start) Grayware Tech Services: Professional Help for Cryp ByuL, and the Limitations of Standard Play
Tourneys
RSL Revival: Season 6 - Qualifiers and Main Event Douyu Cup 2026: $20,000 Legends Event (June 26-28) Maestros of The Game 2 announcement and schedule ! INu's Battles#17 <BO.9> Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament
Strategy
[G] Having the right mentality to improve
Custom Maps
New Map Maker - Looking for Advice - Love or Hate Work In Progress Melee Maps [D]RTS in all its shapes and glory <3
External Content
The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 532 Nuclear Family Mutation # 531 Experimental Artillery Mutation # 530 One For All
Brood War
General
ProGamer Paychecks Story ASL 22 Proposed Map Pool BW General Discussion Best thing happen to StarCraft since Remastered? Data needed
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [ASL21] Grand Finals The Casual Games of the Week Thread [BSL22] GosuLeague Casts - Tue & Thu 22:00 CEST
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Creating a full chart of Zerg builds Relatively freeroll strategies Why doesn't anyone use restoration?
Other Games
General Games
ZeroSpace at Steam NextFest - Last free demo Nintendo Switch Thread Path of Exile Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Beyond All Reason
Dota 2
Looking for a Dota Mentor Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug
TL Mafia
[94721]Better Good-Health Signs Than 3-15 Bans/Yea TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Canadian Politics Mega-thread The Games Industry And ATVI Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine
Fan Clubs
The HerO Fan Club! The herO Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
Movie Discussion! Series you have seen recently... [Req][Books] Good Fantasy/SciFi books [TV/BOOK] *SPOILERS* Game of Thrones Discussion
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 Formula 1 Discussion McBoner: A hockey love story Cricket [SPORT]
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Listen To The Coaches!
TrAiDoS
An Exploration of th…
waywardstrategy
I'm an arrogant trash talke…
FlaShFTW
Gauntlet SC2: A Retrospectiv…
Ctone23
ramps on octagon
StaticNine
Funny Nicknames
LUCKY_NOOB
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 6879 users

Protoss - New method of Production? - Page 3

Forum Index > SC2 General
Post a Reply
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next All
-DaJ-
Profile Joined April 2004
Switzerland539 Posts
May 21 2007 21:11 GMT
#41
On May 22 2007 03:02 mahnini wrote:
No, now I think your initial idea was correct, haha. The only difference is it works like a spell but for every unit you make the gateway you made it out of resets the cooldown for every type of unit. Hmm, but then why would they need separate numbers per icon?


because different unit types have different cooldowns...maybe the gateway that built the first zealot is already loaded and can produce a new zealot. but no immortal, yet...

On May 22 2007 03:02 mahnini wrote:
Edit: To make the idea more clear, the cooldown is for potentially units that you will be building, not for units that you have already built like my reverse build time idea.

Ex: Build zealot instantly, wait zealot build time, build any other unit instantly

Ex2: Wait for unit zealot build time, build zealot, wait for next desired unit build time to be reached, build unit, etc.

I think Ex2 is the way it will work.

This makes me think there are no queues at all because that would make Toss extremely imba, think about suiciding your 200/200 army but being able to build x4 that instantly. O.O

i would agree ex2 makes more sense...

i still go with my previous version: its some kind energy every gate has to load up (like mana) to build a unit (its the exact same system like cooldown, i just call it mana...). now the my question is: what is the max? it cant be 20 other wise a toss user can build 2 zealots out of one gate....just unfair....^^

and what about the update of an gateway to a warp gate? i have never read anything about that....??
Dear God, my brilliance is becoming a bit of a burden.
BluzMan
Profile Blog Joined April 2006
Russian Federation4235 Posts
May 21 2007 21:23 GMT
#42
Omg, so much ado about nothing.

I'm pretty sure this is done like in DoW - first you produce something like it is produced normally, then this thing instead of going out goes to the building "hangar" from where you can deploy it anywhere. Momentary production is BS, Blizzard will NOT do this.
You want 20 good men, but you need a bad pussy.
pyrogenetix
Profile Blog Joined March 2006
China5098 Posts
May 21 2007 21:25 GMT
#43
woa some good ideas here seriously, hope ppl at blizz is reading this =D
Yea that looks just like Kang Min... amazing game sense... and uses mind games well, but has the micro of a washed up progamer.
Zironic
Profile Joined May 2007
Sweden341 Posts
May 21 2007 21:30 GMT
#44
On May 22 2007 06:11 -DaJ- wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 22 2007 03:02 mahnini wrote:
No, now I think your initial idea was correct, haha. The only difference is it works like a spell but for every unit you make the gateway you made it out of resets the cooldown for every type of unit. Hmm, but then why would they need separate numbers per icon?


because different unit types have different cooldowns...maybe the gateway that built the first zealot is already loaded and can produce a new zealot. but no immortal, yet...

Show nested quote +
On May 22 2007 03:02 mahnini wrote:
Edit: To make the idea more clear, the cooldown is for potentially units that you will be building, not for units that you have already built like my reverse build time idea.

Ex: Build zealot instantly, wait zealot build time, build any other unit instantly

Ex2: Wait for unit zealot build time, build zealot, wait for next desired unit build time to be reached, build unit, etc.

I think Ex2 is the way it will work.

This makes me think there are no queues at all because that would make Toss extremely imba, think about suiciding your 200/200 army but being able to build x4 that instantly. O.O

i would agree ex2 makes more sense...

i still go with my previous version: its some kind energy every gate has to load up (like mana) to build a unit (its the exact same system like cooldown, i just call it mana...). now the my question is: what is the max? it cant be 20 other wise a toss user can build 2 zealots out of one gate....just unfair....^^

and what about the update of an gateway to a warp gate? i have never read anything about that....??


If you look at the gameplay video the way it works in the game is obviously example 1. The units will be produced for free in the backround and when you need them you can warp them in for their unit cost and a few seconds warp in time. We don't know how many units Protoss will be able to build out of each gate but based on the replay it seems like they can build one per gate.

On May 22 2007 06:23 BluzMan wrote:
Omg, so much ado about nothing.

I'm pretty sure this is done like in DoW - first you produce something like it is produced normally, then this thing instead of going out goes to the building "hangar" from where you can deploy it anywhere. Momentary production is BS, Blizzard will NOT do this.


I'm pretty sure it won't work like in DoW. You'll be able to deploy them for their cost while they are produced for free in the background :=)

When used in combination with the mobile phase prisms, warp gates allow the protoss unprecedented flexibility in their force deployment. Warp gates can transport protoss warriors directly to the front lines, instantly send defenders to a beleaguered outpost, or rapidly build up attack groups in unexpected sectors. Enemy commanders must be constantly on the lookout for phase prisms penetrating their defensive zones or they can quickly find an entire protoss army deployed on their doorstep.


Seems to hint that Protoss will be able to build their units very fast.
-DaJ-
Profile Joined April 2004
Switzerland539 Posts
May 21 2007 22:00 GMT
#45
On May 22 2007 06:30 Zironic wrote:
If you look at the gameplay video the way it works in the game is obviously example 1. The units will be produced for free in the backround and when you need them you can warp them in for their unit cost and a few seconds warp in time. We don't know how many units Protoss will be able to build out of each gate but based on the replay it seems like they can build one per gate.

the presenter was in the game already for about a minute. of course he could just start with the unit production. because they are "loaded" automatically.

produce those ~16 zealots that fast because he selected ~16 gateways, which allows him to build/warp those zealots....

i would agree with one of the other posters, that they just adapted the "loading"-time for the demo...
Dear God, my brilliance is becoming a bit of a burden.
Tarte
Profile Joined October 2006
Canada933 Posts
May 21 2007 22:11 GMT
#46
On May 22 2007 02:14 HiddenTalent wrote:
Hrm, Im confused now.... :/
L O V E Y O U
marquis
Profile Joined March 2007
United States109 Posts
Last Edited: 2007-05-21 22:18:13
May 21 2007 22:17 GMT
#47
I can't even begin to say how brilliant of an idea this would be if this is the case.

This system singlehandely solves both the plight of the competitive community and the newb - to the newb, this seems like a great thing - you always can get units even if you don't pay attention, but in reality it also rewards speed and "macro".
training iccup
Zironic
Profile Joined May 2007
Sweden341 Posts
Last Edited: 2007-05-21 22:20:05
May 21 2007 22:19 GMT
#48
In order to maximize production you would have to manually go and build the units every cooldown yup :=)

The map editor will probably be able to modify the cap on the units that can be in the warp gate at once so they can create UMS maps where you warp in tons of units at once from one gate
Liquid`Jinro
Profile Blog Joined September 2002
Sweden33719 Posts
May 21 2007 22:45 GMT
#49
I'm not sure I've understood exactly how it works, but if it's how I think it is, that's SO BRILLIANT.
Moderatortell the guy that interplanatar interaction is pivotal to terrans variety of optionitudals in the pre-midgame preperatories as well as the protosstinal deterriggation of elite zergling strikes - Stimey n | Formerly FrozenArbiter
vGl-CoW
Profile Blog Joined December 2002
Belgium8305 Posts
May 21 2007 22:50 GMT
#50
I understand the concept being explained here, and it seems to be consistent with what can be seen in the presentation... I'm gonna check it out again myself in a bit to make sure.

This really is a cool and innovative way of changing things around, and it makes sense, too. I was already wondering how warpgates were gonna be effective if the units couldn't be put on hold in some way, and this solves that problem beautifully. Way to go, Blizzard.
Moderatorfollow me on twitter if u think ur so tough @BooyaCow
Jyvblamo
Profile Blog Joined June 2006
Canada13788 Posts
May 22 2007 00:58 GMT
#51
Sounds like an interesting developement, but I will have to wait to hear from Blizzard before I cream my pants.
Asta
Profile Joined October 2002
Germany3491 Posts
Last Edited: 2007-05-22 03:08:45
May 22 2007 03:04 GMT
#52
I didn't have time to read the whole thread but is it just me who thinks this concept sucks?
Of course you now have to 'release' each unit (more or less) separately but you can do that instantly. A bad player will no longer realize that he just lost a battle and forgot to reproduce his army while he is being run over. The gateways will produce zealots on their own, so you can never forget to produce units. So basically you still have to do about the same work as in BW but you can now chose the time almost freely. This of course requires less multitasking. Multitasking is only important if important 'events' collide in time.


edit: I hope BluzMan is right.
gravity
Profile Joined March 2004
Australia2198 Posts
May 22 2007 03:11 GMT
#53
This actually sounds really cool if it works how people seem to think it does. Really goes with their thing of making the races even more different.
Zironic
Profile Joined May 2007
Sweden341 Posts
May 22 2007 03:11 GMT
#54
On May 22 2007 12:04 Asta wrote:
I didn't have time to read the whole thread but is it just me who thinks this concept sucks?
Of course you now have to 'release' each unit (more or less) separately but you can do that instantly. A bad player will no longer realize that he just lost a battle and forgot to reproduce his army while he is being run over. The gateways will produce zealots on their own, so you can never forget to produce units. So basically you still have to do about the same work as in BW but you can now chose the time almost freely. This of course requires less multitasking. Multitasking is only important if important 'events' collide in time.


edit: I hope BluzMan is right.


I think you somehow managed to completly fail to understand anything that has been said.

The gateways will (as it seems on the video) produce ONE, UNO Zealot until you choose to pay for it and warp it in. This means if you don't pay attention to your production the gateways will just stand idle with that one Zealot waiting to be warped in.

Since you this way can't queue units at all you have to pay even more attention to your unit production then before.
Mynock
Profile Joined September 2002
4492 Posts
Last Edited: 2007-05-22 03:27:13
May 22 2007 03:25 GMT
#55
OK, I've analyzed the videos myself and I'd like to add a little correction as to how I see things.

It seems to me that the Warp Gates are indeed producing units automatically, just like as if it was a skill with a cooldown, and you can also warp the completed units anywhere in your pylon range (whether or not it has to be connected I dunno - in the demo, the prisms were in the range of the pylons atop of the platform, so that doesn't support either theory, nor disproves neither of them). However, I think the system goes a bit further than that, and this is my assumption:

The number of the Warp Gates a player has determines the amount of units "stacked" in queue and ready to be deployed, as well as the build time. Let's say you have 1 Warp Gate. The building time for a zealot would be 60 secs, for a stalk or an imma it would be 70 secs. Now, as soon as you build your Warp Gate (or upgrd from a Gateway rather) the counter goes down, and as 60 secs go by, you have a (1) next to your zealot picture, signifying you can now deploy a zealot. After 70 secs have passed, you get a (1) next to both the imma and the stalk so you can now deploy 1 of those (or choose to deploy the zealot having wasted 10 seconds of valuable building time).

Now, if you have 2 gateways, I imagine the build time (the spell cooldown time if you wish) would be halved. Building a zealot now would take only 30 secs, and if 30 secs have passed you get a (1) near your zealot picture, if 60 secs have passed you get a (2).

What I base this upon, is that in essence, it would still enable the player to produce the same amount of units in the same period of time, except being able to choose when to deploy them, which would be necessary with this system, since you can't queue any units anymore, just like the Zerg can't either. Another thing is, if you watch the cooldown rate for the zealots with 16 gateways, it seemed to be freaking fast, so my assumption would be that that is because the building time was essentially 1/16th of the original.

Of course these are all but guesses, but this is how I see the system ATM.

-Mynock
dudel
Profile Joined December 2006
Germany188 Posts
May 22 2007 04:08 GMT
#56
On May 22 2007 12:25 Mynock wrote:
OK, I've analyzed the videos myself and I'd like to add a little correction as to how I see things.

It seems to me that the Warp Gates are indeed producing units automatically, just like as if it was a skill with a cooldown, and you can also warp the completed units anywhere in your pylon range (whether or not it has to be connected I dunno - in the demo, the prisms were in the range of the pylons atop of the platform, so that doesn't support either theory, nor disproves neither of them). However, I think the system goes a bit further than that, and this is my assumption:

The number of the Warp Gates a player has determines the amount of units "stacked" in queue and ready to be deployed, as well as the build time. Let's say you have 1 Warp Gate. The building time for a zealot would be 60 secs, for a stalk or an imma it would be 70 secs. Now, as soon as you build your Warp Gate (or upgrd from a Gateway rather) the counter goes down, and as 60 secs go by, you have a (1) next to your zealot picture, signifying you can now deploy a zealot. After 70 secs have passed, you get a (1) next to both the imma and the stalk so you can now deploy 1 of those (or choose to deploy the zealot having wasted 10 seconds of valuable building time).

Now, if you have 2 gateways, I imagine the build time (the spell cooldown time if you wish) would be halved. Building a zealot now would take only 30 secs, and if 30 secs have passed you get a (1) near your zealot picture, if 60 secs have passed you get a (2).

What I base this upon, is that in essence, it would still enable the player to produce the same amount of units in the same period of time, except being able to choose when to deploy them, which would be necessary with this system, since you can't queue any units anymore, just like the Zerg can't either. Another thing is, if you watch the cooldown rate for the zealots with 16 gateways, it seemed to be freaking fast, so my assumption would be that that is because the building time was essentially 1/16th of the original.

Of course these are all but guesses, but this is how I see the system ATM.

-Mynock

Yeah, I think you are right, but this was already stated in this thread, but not in this detail. And I think it is a really great idea.
InToTheWannaB
Profile Joined September 2002
United States4770 Posts
May 22 2007 04:21 GMT
#57
Thats freaking cool!! I just hope this does not make protoss too powerful at later stages. Imagin being able to have pylons at important places around the map and warping in 16 zealots every few seconds around the map lol. Then again I'm sure much like normal BWs if you let your opponent get the economy to support 16 gates your most likely screwed anyway lol.
When the spirit is not altogether slain, great loss teaches men and women to desire greatly, both for themselves and for others.
ReTr0[p.S]
Profile Joined March 2005
Argentina1590 Posts
May 22 2007 04:23 GMT
#58
On May 22 2007 06:23 BluzMan wrote:
Omg, so much ado about nothing.

I'm pretty sure this is done like in DoW - first you produce something like it is produced normally, then this thing instead of going out goes to the building "hangar" from where you can deploy it anywhere. Momentary production is BS, Blizzard will NOT do this.


That's exactly what I'm thinking..
Too much commotion into build times and queues and mana...
BluzMan pointed out the most obvious approach into how the warp gates work..
Zironic
Profile Joined May 2007
Sweden341 Posts
May 22 2007 04:26 GMT
#59
On May 22 2007 13:23 ReTr0[p.S] wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 22 2007 06:23 BluzMan wrote:
Omg, so much ado about nothing.

I'm pretty sure this is done like in DoW - first you produce something like it is produced normally, then this thing instead of going out goes to the building "hangar" from where you can deploy it anywhere. Momentary production is BS, Blizzard will NOT do this.


That's exactly what I'm thinking..
Too much commotion into build times and queues and mana...
BluzMan pointed out the most obvious approach into how the warp gates work..


I disagree and think Mynocks way is alot more logical and also happens to be the way it works in the video.
CuddlyCuteKitten
Profile Joined January 2004
Sweden2824 Posts
May 22 2007 04:48 GMT
#60
I disagree with Mynocks theory. I think this is the case because the gateways will most likely have some kind of building animation, and I think a system like this would benefit from graphical feedback.
Also that kind of system have the potential to be seriously imbalanced in some situations, specifically if the dark templar is still in the game. The ability to pop out a unit every 5 seconds would be huge distraction to the enemy. Basically you could pop out and A move units all over the map easily while the enemey is forced to respond to each one to save his workers.
Finally such a system (speed depending on total number of gateways) would mean that there would have to be separate systems for warpgates and normal gates, otherwise you could build just 1 warpgate and intead of deploying 15 zealots at your base and 1 zealot in the enemy base at your prism you click once every 5 seconds when the cooldown resets and get the same ammount of zealots in the enemy base without buying more than one warpgate (of course the upgrade could be a tier 3 done at the nexus instead of all the gates individually and then mynocs theory is much more plausible.)
Unity, support, family, and kneecapping bitches.
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Bombastic Starleague
20:00
GosuLeague Ro16 - Swiss
ZZZero.O89
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
ViBE66
Temp0 44
StarCraft: Brood War
Artosis 466
ZZZero.O 89
sSak 11
Purpose 11
Bale 7
Dota 2
capcasts57
Super Smash Bros
AZ_Axe112
Other Games
summit1g8039
Grubby2981
FrodaN748
shahzam725
C9.Mang0264
UpATreeSC85
JuggernautJason20
Organizations
Dota 2
PGL Dota 2 - Main Stream253
Other Games
BasetradeTV244
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
[ Show 16 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Hupsaiya 98
• musti20045 26
• davetesta21
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Other Games
• imaqtpie805
• Scarra491
• Shiphtur269
Upcoming Events
PiGosaur Cup
1h 9m
Kung Fu Cup
12h 9m
Replay Cast
1d 1h
CrankTV Team League
1d 12h
Bombastic Starleague
1d 21h
The PondCast
2 days
HomeStory Cup
2 days
Replay Cast
3 days
HomeStory Cup
3 days
Replay Cast
4 days
[ Show More ]
HomeStory Cup
4 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
5 days
WardiTV Weekly
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2026-06-29
Douyu Cup 2026
Murky Cup 2026

Ongoing

IPSL Spring 2026
Acropolis #4
CSCL: Masked Kings S4
YSL S3
CSL Season 21: Qualifier 2
SCTL 2026 Spring
IEM Cologne Major 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 2
CS Asia Championships 2026
Asian Champions League 2026
IEM Atlanta 2026
PGL Astana 2026
BLAST Rivals Spring 2026
IEM Rio 2026

Upcoming

CSL 2026 Summer (S21)
ASL Season 22:Wild Card Qualifier
CSLAN 4
Blizzard Classic Cup 2026
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
RSL Revival: Season 6
CranK Gathers Season 4: BW vs SC2 Team League
HSC XXIX
Light Tournament 2026
Eternal Conflict S2 Finale
Eternal Conflict S2 E1
Heroes Pulsing #3
FISSURE Playground #5
BLAST Open Fall 2026
Esports World Cup 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer Qual
Stake Ranked Episode 3
XSE Pro League 2026
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.