EPTCommunity Feedback Update - March 13 - Page 9
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
DSh1
292 Posts
| ||
|
Fango
United Kingdom8987 Posts
On March 17 2018 23:27 Durnuu wrote: That's a stupid argument, of course bio will end the game before a mech composition does. It's not about game length, it's about competitiveness. The mech and raven games were close to some degree. The bio game was a roflstomp. If anything this series shows bio is stronger than mech/sky. Also games with an obvious skill difference shouldn't really be used in balance discussions. Unless the weak player wins I guess. | ||
|
RoflStomped
Iceland21 Posts
On March 17 2018 23:35 DSh1 wrote: Still, like I am sure other people mentioned the Raven missilie has to go. It's just bad to play and watch massing ravens. If Blizzard provide an effective alternative then I agree, No viking hp buff at any amount will achieve that. | ||
|
hiroshOne
Poland425 Posts
| ||
|
Boggyb
2855 Posts
On March 17 2018 23:35 DSh1 wrote: Still, like I am sure other people mentioned the Raven missilie has to go. It's just bad to play and watch massing ravens. Watching mass queens, infestors, or vipers is terrible, but we can't touch Zerg's precious spellcasters! | ||
|
Athenau
569 Posts
User was warned for this post | ||
|
Carminedust
487 Posts
| ||
|
Psychobabas
2531 Posts
On March 18 2018 04:44 Carminedust wrote: Ravens have always been an issue it always once a terran gets X amount of ravens its a win for the terran unless they have very sloppy control. whether it would be mass PDD spam or Hunter seeker missle spam to now anti armor spam were you just blanket the army in it and boop there goes the army Kind of like psi storm. | ||
|
SCHWARZENEGGER
206 Posts
On March 17 2018 23:35 DSh1 wrote: Still, like I am sure other people mentioned the Raven missilie has to go. It's just bad to play and watch massing ravens. it's only possible when terran is untouched for 15 minutes, so Z and P must move their asses sometime. | ||
|
Charoisaur
Germany15956 Posts
On March 18 2018 00:36 RoflStomped wrote: If Blizzard provide an effective alternative then I agree, No viking hp buff at any amount will achieve that. +200 viking HP wouldn't achieve that? | ||
|
pereza0
17 Posts
I would either reduce the casting range a bit, so its not so safe to use. Decreasing the damage a bit is an alternative, but I think lower range would keep the style alive but it would be a bit less hard to counter | ||
|
RoflStomped
Iceland21 Posts
Constructive conversation as always. | ||
|
Charoisaur
Germany15956 Posts
okay, replace 200 with 20-50. | ||
|
SCHWARZENEGGER
206 Posts
On March 18 2018 05:34 pereza0 wrote: I do think only Maru could pull it off so well, but still, the missile feels a bit too safe. I would either reduce the casting range a bit, so its not so safe to use. Decreasing the damage a bit is an alternative, but I think lower range would keep the style alive but it would be a bit less hard to counter decreased cast range it's like equivalent to 0 damage missile, parasitic already almost one hitting ravens, really down it do 10-15 damage would be perfect. | ||
|
Geo.Rion
7377 Posts
On March 18 2018 06:37 SCHWARZENEGGER wrote: decreased cast range it's like equivalent to 0 damage missile, parasitic already almost one hitting ravens, really down it do 10-15 damage would be perfect. If by one hitting you mean the full duration of a parasitic bomb does not kill a raven, then yes. How many ravens went down in the Maru vs Serral game to parasitic bombs? Ravens have a sight of 11 and range on missile is 10, PB with 8 range is not the counter to ravens | ||
|
ihatevideogames
570 Posts
| ||
|
DomeGetta
480 Posts
On March 18 2018 19:42 ihatevideogames wrote: Are we really still talking about Ravens, when the first terran tournament win in months comes from a bio/tank push and 2 consecutive games of cheese? LOL hopefully not. Series went exactly as expected tbh..im just so happy for Maru..the balls rofl. Dark was not gonna be stopped by Ravens..not even close..so Maru summoned MVP | ||
|
SCHWARZENEGGER
206 Posts
On March 18 2018 19:36 Geo.Rion wrote: If by one hitting you mean the full duration of a parasitic bomb does not kill a raven, then yes. How many ravens went down in the Maru vs Serral game to parasitic bombs? Ravens have a sight of 11 and range on missile is 10, PB with 8 range is not the counter to ravens when terran can afford losing 20 ravens and making 9 nukes at once, then you know his opponent is messed up. at 19;00 mark in g3 you can see most of ravens are killed by vipers. | ||
|
Geo.Rion
7377 Posts
On March 18 2018 19:42 ihatevideogames wrote: Are we really still talking about Ravens, when the first terran tournament win in months comes from a bio/tank push and 2 consecutive games of cheese? This thread is still about the proposed/withdrawn Raven changes, so yeah. If u want to cry about how underpowered Terran is because it could only win the Bo7 grandfinals for 200k$ with certain strat, find the appropriate thread | ||
|
DomeGetta
480 Posts
On March 18 2018 22:01 Geo.Rion wrote: This thread is still about the proposed/withdrawn Raven changes, so yeah. If u want to cry about how underpowered Terran is because it could only win the Bo7 grandfinals for 200k$ with certain strat, find the appropriate thread LOL. Zerg tears bc Dark made dealing with ravens look easy. Game 1 was really bad to watch tho. But its crystal clear that the problem is on both sides. Any matchup where both players have incentive not to attacknl is bad.. but the early game helped set that up. Rest of the games were relatively entertaining but im not a big fan of mech v z myself. | ||
| ||
