• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 09:12
CEST 15:12
KST 22:12
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Team TLMC #5 - Finalists & Open Tournaments1[ASL20] Ro16 Preview Pt2: Turbulence10Classic Games #3: Rogue vs Serral at BlizzCon9[ASL20] Ro16 Preview Pt1: Ascent10Maestros of the Game: Week 1/Play-in Preview12
Community News
StarCraft II 5.0.15 PTR Patch Notes148BSL 2025 Warsaw LAN + Legends Showmatch2Weekly Cups (Sept 8-14): herO & MaxPax split cups4WardiTV TL Team Map Contest #5 Tournaments1SC4ALL $6,000 Open LAN in Philadelphia8
StarCraft 2
General
StarCraft II 5.0.15 PTR Patch Notes #1: Maru - Greatest Players of All Time Why Storm Should NOT Be Nerfed – A Core Part of Pr Team TLMC #5 - Finalists & Open Tournaments Team Liquid Map Contest #21 - Presented by Monster Energy
Tourneys
RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series Stellar Fest KSL Week 80 StarCraft Evolution League (SC Evo Biweekly) SC2's Safe House 2 - October 18 & 19
Strategy
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation # 491 Night Drive Mutation # 490 Masters of Midnight Mutation # 489 Bannable Offense Mutation # 488 What Goes Around
Brood War
General
Soulkey on ASL S20 ASL20 General Discussion BW General Discussion Diplomacy, Cosmonarchy Edition ASL TICKET LIVE help! :D
Tourneys
[ASL20] Ro16 Group D BSL 2025 Warsaw LAN + Legends Showmatch [ASL20] Ro16 Group C Small VOD Thread 2.0
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Muta micro map competition Fighting Spirit mining rates [G] Mineral Boosting
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread Path of Exile Borderlands 3 General RTS Discussion Thread
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion LiquidDota to reintegrate into TL.net
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread The Big Programming Thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread UK Politics Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
The Happy Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Anime Discussion Thread
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion MLB/Baseball 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Linksys AE2500 USB WIFI keeps disconnecting Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread High temperatures on bridge(s)
TL Community
BarCraft in Tokyo Japan for ASL Season5 Final The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Too Many LANs? Tournament Ov…
TrAiDoS
i'm really bored guys
Peanutsc
I <=> 9
KrillinFromwales
A very expensive lesson on ma…
Garnet
hello world
radishsoup
Lemme tell you a thing o…
JoinTheRain
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1681 users

Community Feedback Update - March 13 - Page 12

Forum Index > SC2 General
235 CommentsPost a Reply
Prev 1 10 11 12 All
BisuDagger
Profile Blog Joined October 2009
Bisutopia19267 Posts
March 19 2018 14:29 GMT
#221
On March 19 2018 22:58 ReachTheSky wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 19 2018 22:40 Boggyb wrote:
On March 19 2018 20:27 ypslala wrote:
i have a suggestion: the function of the bunker is to defend a terran base. bunkers should not be allowed for offensive purporses - especially in early game. to avoid bunker rush/cheese they need to be in range of a command center. for example like 15 range

The function of spore crawlers and spine crawlers is to defend Zerg bases. Neither should be allowed for offensive purposes. To avoid misuse of the buildings, they need to be in range of a hatchery. For example, like 15 range.


Nothing is stopping a zerg from building a hatchery anywhere on the map to create creep for the spines/spores to burrow on.

Float a command center across the map and build bunkers wherever it floats.
ModeratorFormer Afreeca Starleague Caster: http://afreeca.tv/ASL2ENG2
WaesumNinja
Profile Joined February 2012
210 Posts
March 19 2018 15:07 GMT
#222
On March 19 2018 23:27 fds wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 19 2018 21:35 ihatevideogames wrote:
What if Armory cost and build time were reduced, so terran could start 2/2 infantry a bit faster?
Would faster terran infantry upgrades and faster upgrades for mech have too big ramifications for TvZ?


Making bio 2/2 upgrade faster is very interesting idea. Cheaper and faster armory might be problematic due to faster access to helbats and thors.
Maybe simple solution would be to postpone armory requirement, so you would need it only for 3/3.


I don't think armory should be a requirement for bio upgrades at all.
ReachTheSky
Profile Joined April 2010
United States3294 Posts
Last Edited: 2018-03-19 15:35:14
March 19 2018 15:34 GMT
#223
On March 19 2018 23:29 BisuDagger wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 19 2018 22:58 ReachTheSky wrote:
On March 19 2018 22:40 Boggyb wrote:
On March 19 2018 20:27 ypslala wrote:
i have a suggestion: the function of the bunker is to defend a terran base. bunkers should not be allowed for offensive purporses - especially in early game. to avoid bunker rush/cheese they need to be in range of a command center. for example like 15 range

The function of spore crawlers and spine crawlers is to defend Zerg bases. Neither should be allowed for offensive purposes. To avoid misuse of the buildings, they need to be in range of a hatchery. For example, like 15 range.


Nothing is stopping a zerg from building a hatchery anywhere on the map to create creep for the spines/spores to burrow on.

Float a command center across the map and build bunkers wherever it floats.


Except that if you make this change to the terran bunker, It removes terran aggression options and makes the game less interactive. Less interactive games=bad for viewership because they are boring to watch and we aren't here to watch someone play simcity or listen to pointless caster banter for the first several minutes of a game.

TL+ Member
Tyrhanius
Profile Joined April 2011
France947 Posts
March 19 2018 19:18 GMT
#224
On March 20 2018 00:34 ReachTheSky wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 19 2018 23:29 BisuDagger wrote:
On March 19 2018 22:58 ReachTheSky wrote:
On March 19 2018 22:40 Boggyb wrote:
On March 19 2018 20:27 ypslala wrote:
i have a suggestion: the function of the bunker is to defend a terran base. bunkers should not be allowed for offensive purporses - especially in early game. to avoid bunker rush/cheese they need to be in range of a command center. for example like 15 range

The function of spore crawlers and spine crawlers is to defend Zerg bases. Neither should be allowed for offensive purposes. To avoid misuse of the buildings, they need to be in range of a hatchery. For example, like 15 range.


Nothing is stopping a zerg from building a hatchery anywhere on the map to create creep for the spines/spores to burrow on.

Float a command center across the map and build bunkers wherever it floats.


Except that if you make this change to the terran bunker, It removes terran aggression options and makes the game less interactive. Less interactive games=bad for viewership because they are boring to watch and we aren't here to watch someone play simcity or listen to pointless caster banter for the first several minutes of a game.


So you're for letting overlord drop T1 ? because it's exactly the same
joshap
Profile Joined March 2018
1 Post
March 19 2018 20:10 GMT
#225
--- Nuked ---
pvsnp
Profile Joined January 2017
7676 Posts
Last Edited: 2018-03-19 23:17:04
March 19 2018 23:14 GMT
#226
On March 20 2018 04:18 Tyrhanius wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 20 2018 00:34 ReachTheSky wrote:
On March 19 2018 23:29 BisuDagger wrote:
On March 19 2018 22:58 ReachTheSky wrote:
On March 19 2018 22:40 Boggyb wrote:
On March 19 2018 20:27 ypslala wrote:
i have a suggestion: the function of the bunker is to defend a terran base. bunkers should not be allowed for offensive purporses - especially in early game. to avoid bunker rush/cheese they need to be in range of a command center. for example like 15 range

The function of spore crawlers and spine crawlers is to defend Zerg bases. Neither should be allowed for offensive purposes. To avoid misuse of the buildings, they need to be in range of a hatchery. For example, like 15 range.


Nothing is stopping a zerg from building a hatchery anywhere on the map to create creep for the spines/spores to burrow on.

Float a command center across the map and build bunkers wherever it floats.


Except that if you make this change to the terran bunker, It removes terran aggression options and makes the game less interactive. Less interactive games=bad for viewership because they are boring to watch and we aren't here to watch someone play simcity or listen to pointless caster banter for the first several minutes of a game.


So you're for letting overlord drop T1 ? because it's exactly the same

Lmao ling drops and bunker rushes are as different as they get. Basically a perfect antithesis.

Stationary defense structure for ranged units against melee

vs

Mobile transport unit for melee units against ranged
Denominator of the Universe
TL+ Member
ReachTheSky
Profile Joined April 2010
United States3294 Posts
March 20 2018 00:11 GMT
#227
On March 20 2018 04:18 Tyrhanius wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 20 2018 00:34 ReachTheSky wrote:
On March 19 2018 23:29 BisuDagger wrote:
On March 19 2018 22:58 ReachTheSky wrote:
On March 19 2018 22:40 Boggyb wrote:
On March 19 2018 20:27 ypslala wrote:
i have a suggestion: the function of the bunker is to defend a terran base. bunkers should not be allowed for offensive purporses - especially in early game. to avoid bunker rush/cheese they need to be in range of a command center. for example like 15 range

The function of spore crawlers and spine crawlers is to defend Zerg bases. Neither should be allowed for offensive purposes. To avoid misuse of the buildings, they need to be in range of a hatchery. For example, like 15 range.


Nothing is stopping a zerg from building a hatchery anywhere on the map to create creep for the spines/spores to burrow on.

Float a command center across the map and build bunkers wherever it floats.


Except that if you make this change to the terran bunker, It removes terran aggression options and makes the game less interactive. Less interactive games=bad for viewership because they are boring to watch and we aren't here to watch someone play simcity or listen to pointless caster banter for the first several minutes of a game.


So you're for letting overlord drop T1 ? because it's exactly the same


I personally prefer zerg to still have it in their bag of goodies since it's fun to execute and fun to watch. Maybe they should have buffed the sentry to allow protoss the early scouting instead, who knows. I've heard some protosses say they will still go stargate anyway due to the benefits it offers. I can't say which solution is the best in the long run. I think with the change blizzard made toss gets to play even greedier now.
TL+ Member
ypslala
Profile Joined April 2011
Burma545 Posts
March 20 2018 00:53 GMT
#228
On March 19 2018 23:29 BisuDagger wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 19 2018 22:58 ReachTheSky wrote:
On March 19 2018 22:40 Boggyb wrote:
On March 19 2018 20:27 ypslala wrote:
i have a suggestion: the function of the bunker is to defend a terran base. bunkers should not be allowed for offensive purporses - especially in early game. to avoid bunker rush/cheese they need to be in range of a command center. for example like 15 range

The function of spore crawlers and spine crawlers is to defend Zerg bases. Neither should be allowed for offensive purposes. To avoid misuse of the buildings, they need to be in range of a hatchery. For example, like 15 range.


Nothing is stopping a zerg from building a hatchery anywhere on the map to create creep for the spines/spores to burrow on.

Float a command center across the map and build bunkers wherever it floats.

if maru had to do that first, he would have lost the finals and 120000 US $ if i am right.
there is no income while floating the CC and no scvs can be produced.
________________
and if you have to build a hatch first, you need to spend 300 minerals. and if you want to get creep from overlords, you need to have a lair first!
and the terran player gets a refund for the bunker... you can't compare spine crawler with bunker rush at all.
best SC2 game of aaaaaaall time: vibe vs avilo (don't miss the end!!): https://youtu.be/mygH92WzKV4
ypslala
Profile Joined April 2011
Burma545 Posts
March 20 2018 00:58 GMT
#229
On March 20 2018 00:34 ReachTheSky wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 19 2018 23:29 BisuDagger wrote:
On March 19 2018 22:58 ReachTheSky wrote:
On March 19 2018 22:40 Boggyb wrote:
On March 19 2018 20:27 ypslala wrote:
i have a suggestion: the function of the bunker is to defend a terran base. bunkers should not be allowed for offensive purporses - especially in early game. to avoid bunker rush/cheese they need to be in range of a command center. for example like 15 range

The function of spore crawlers and spine crawlers is to defend Zerg bases. Neither should be allowed for offensive purposes. To avoid misuse of the buildings, they need to be in range of a hatchery. For example, like 15 range.


Nothing is stopping a zerg from building a hatchery anywhere on the map to create creep for the spines/spores to burrow on.

Float a command center across the map and build bunkers wherever it floats.


Except that if you make this change to the terran bunker, It removes terran aggression options and makes the game less interactive. Less interactive games=bad for viewership because they are boring to watch and we aren't here to watch someone play simcity or listen to pointless caster banter for the first several minutes of a game.


the World Electronic Sports Games 2017 finals game 7 was a disaster for the viewership. totally disapointing.
best SC2 game of aaaaaaall time: vibe vs avilo (don't miss the end!!): https://youtu.be/mygH92WzKV4
Poixyois
Profile Joined March 2018
16 Posts
Last Edited: 2018-03-20 18:13:46
March 20 2018 18:12 GMT
#230
On March 20 2018 09:58 ypslala wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 20 2018 00:34 ReachTheSky wrote:
On March 19 2018 23:29 BisuDagger wrote:
On March 19 2018 22:58 ReachTheSky wrote:
On March 19 2018 22:40 Boggyb wrote:
On March 19 2018 20:27 ypslala wrote:
i have a suggestion: the function of the bunker is to defend a terran base. bunkers should not be allowed for offensive purporses - especially in early game. to avoid bunker rush/cheese they need to be in range of a command center. for example like 15 range

The function of spore crawlers and spine crawlers is to defend Zerg bases. Neither should be allowed for offensive purposes. To avoid misuse of the buildings, they need to be in range of a hatchery. For example, like 15 range.


Nothing is stopping a zerg from building a hatchery anywhere on the map to create creep for the spines/spores to burrow on.

Float a command center across the map and build bunkers wherever it floats.


Except that if you make this change to the terran bunker, It removes terran aggression options and makes the game less interactive. Less interactive games=bad for viewership because they are boring to watch and we aren't here to watch someone play simcity or listen to pointless caster banter for the first several minutes of a game.


the World Electronic Sports Games 2017 finals game 7 was a disaster for the viewership. totally disapointing.

Can you back that up with a survey?
JayuSC2
Profile Joined April 2015
Austria32 Posts
March 20 2018 18:39 GMT
#231
Raven missile in it's current state is just bad for the game, there is no counterplay to it for zerg at least. It outranges most units and the missiles travel way too fast to make proper splitting possible (even the best zergs can't manage to split against it as we saw many times). Can't believe they really wanna keept it, they should rather buff terran in other ways, if their winrate is really that bad.
KR_4EVR
Profile Joined July 2017
316 Posts
March 20 2018 18:44 GMT
#232
On March 20 2018 00:07 WaesumNinja wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 19 2018 23:27 fds wrote:
On March 19 2018 21:35 ihatevideogames wrote:
What if Armory cost and build time were reduced, so terran could start 2/2 infantry a bit faster?
Would faster terran infantry upgrades and faster upgrades for mech have too big ramifications for TvZ?


Making bio 2/2 upgrade faster is very interesting idea. Cheaper and faster armory might be problematic due to faster access to helbats and thors.
Maybe simple solution would be to postpone armory requirement, so you would need it only for 3/3.


I don't think armory should be a requirement for bio upgrades at all.


Personally I think that a lot of balance issues in TvP could be solved by halving the reactor build time.
Et tu Brute ?
KR_4EVR
Profile Joined July 2017
316 Posts
March 20 2018 18:45 GMT
#233
On March 21 2018 03:39 JayuSC2 wrote:
Raven missile in it's current state is just bad for the game, there is no counterplay to it for zerg at least. It outranges most units and the missiles travel way too fast to make proper splitting possible (even the best zergs can't manage to split against it as we saw many times). Can't believe they really wanna keept it, they should rather buff terran in other ways, if their winrate is really that bad.


First, It's not strictly uncounterable. Use fungals and parasitic bombs to decimate multiple ravens. Second, I agree that there should be a brief delay to enable splitting.
Et tu Brute ?
KR_4EVR
Profile Joined July 2017
316 Posts
Last Edited: 2018-03-20 18:47:17
March 20 2018 18:46 GMT
#234
On March 20 2018 09:58 ypslala wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 20 2018 00:34 ReachTheSky wrote:
On March 19 2018 23:29 BisuDagger wrote:
On March 19 2018 22:58 ReachTheSky wrote:
On March 19 2018 22:40 Boggyb wrote:
On March 19 2018 20:27 ypslala wrote:
i have a suggestion: the function of the bunker is to defend a terran base. bunkers should not be allowed for offensive purporses - especially in early game. to avoid bunker rush/cheese they need to be in range of a command center. for example like 15 range

The function of spore crawlers and spine crawlers is to defend Zerg bases. Neither should be allowed for offensive purposes. To avoid misuse of the buildings, they need to be in range of a hatchery. For example, like 15 range.


Nothing is stopping a zerg from building a hatchery anywhere on the map to create creep for the spines/spores to burrow on.

Float a command center across the map and build bunkers wherever it floats.


Except that if you make this change to the terran bunker, It removes terran aggression options and makes the game less interactive. Less interactive games=bad for viewership because they are boring to watch and we aren't here to watch someone play simcity or listen to pointless caster banter for the first several minutes of a game.


the World Electronic Sports Games 2017 finals game 7 was a disaster for the viewership. totally disapointing.


How do you mean? Most tournament games with best of 7 have at least 2 rush games. This one had 3. Re-watch both of $O$'s Blizzcon finals.

In terms of viewer numbers, I think that a lot of people found the time of broadcast inconvenient; that's all.
Et tu Brute ?
DomeGetta
Profile Joined February 2012
480 Posts
March 20 2018 23:54 GMT
#235
On March 21 2018 03:39 JayuSC2 wrote:
Raven missile in it's current state is just bad for the game, there is no counterplay to it for zerg at least. It outranges most units and the missiles travel way too fast to make proper splitting possible (even the best zergs can't manage to split against it as we saw many times). Can't believe they really wanna keept it, they should rather buff terran in other ways, if their winrate is really that bad.



Why do people keep parroting this nonsense?

Did you even watch WESG finals?

If you did and you are still saying this it's really bizarre.

I'm OK if you don't like watching it (yet some how I bet you enjoy watching Broods a move across the map), but to say it has no counter is straight up wrong - watch the games rofl.
pvsnp
Profile Joined January 2017
7676 Posts
Last Edited: 2018-03-21 00:19:45
March 21 2018 00:15 GMT
#236
On March 21 2018 03:39 JayuSC2 wrote:
Raven missile in it's current state is just bad for the game, there is no counterplay to it for zerg at least. It outranges most units and the missiles travel way too fast to make proper splitting possible (even the best zergs can't manage to split against it as we saw many times). Can't believe they really wanna keept it, they should rather buff terran in other ways, if their winrate is really that bad.

Dark's counterplay was to split and friendly fire onto SCVs:


Instead of screaming how broken it is on the forums, try watching what the pros like Dark do. Anyone who actually watched the WESG finals knows that Maru didn't rely on Ravens to win at all.
Denominator of the Universe
TL+ Member
Prev 1 10 11 12 All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
RSL Revival
10:00
Season 2: Playoffs Day 7
Cure vs ZounLIVE!
Tasteless1244
Crank 1156
IndyStarCraft 235
Rex132
CranKy Ducklings119
3DClanTV 59
IntoTheiNu 19
LiquipediaDiscussion
BSL Open LAN 2025 - War…
08:00
Day 1 - Group Stages
ZZZero.O99
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Tasteless 1244
Crank 1156
IndyStarCraft 235
Rex 132
Railgan 30
MindelVK 24
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 69632
Calm 5940
Rain 2497
EffOrt 2118
Horang2 2072
Flash 1476
GuemChi 1061
BeSt 618
Larva 604
Hyuk 427
[ Show more ]
actioN 420
Hyun 335
firebathero 207
Soma 194
Last 191
Rush 168
Light 137
Zeus 128
Sharp 115
ZZZero.O 99
sSak 86
ajuk12(nOOB) 81
Soulkey 74
Aegong 72
hero 61
Free 53
Mong 53
Nal_rA 32
Movie 32
soO 31
ivOry 25
Noble 22
Sacsri 15
Sexy 14
Terrorterran 9
Hm[arnc] 7
Dota 2
Gorgc4219
singsing3354
qojqva2035
Dendi1219
XcaliburYe483
Fuzer 217
Counter-Strike
shoxiejesuss192
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor203
Other Games
gofns9643
tarik_tv5924
B2W.Neo1262
DeMusliM557
crisheroes387
Hui .200
Lowko200
mouzStarbuck91
NeuroSwarm41
TKL 34
Trikslyr29
Organizations
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 16 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• IndyKCrew
• sooper7s
• Migwel
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• intothetv
• Kozan
StarCraft: Brood War
• ZZZeroYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• C_a_k_e 2390
League of Legends
• Nemesis3028
• Jankos1936
• Stunt496
Other Games
• WagamamaTV237
• Shiphtur15
Upcoming Events
OSC
7h 48m
BSL Open LAN 2025 - War…
18h 48m
RSL Revival
20h 48m
Classic vs TBD
WardiTV Invitational
21h 48m
Online Event
1d 2h
Wardi Open
1d 21h
Monday Night Weeklies
2 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
2 days
LiuLi Cup
3 days
The PondCast
4 days
[ Show More ]
CranKy Ducklings
5 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2025-09-10
Chzzk MurlocKing SC1 vs SC2 Cup #2
HCC Europe

Ongoing

BSL 20 Team Wars
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 3
BSL 21 Points
ASL Season 20
CSL 2025 AUTUMN (S18)
LASL Season 20
2025 Chongqing Offline CUP
BSL World Championship of Poland 2025
RSL Revival: Season 2
Maestros of the Game
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1

Upcoming

IPSL Winter 2025-26
BSL Season 21
SC4ALL: Brood War
BSL 21 Team A
Stellar Fest
SC4ALL: StarCraft II
EC S1
ESL Impact League Season 8
SL Budapest Major 2025
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025
IEM Chengdu 2025
PGL Masters Bucharest 2025
Thunderpick World Champ.
CS Asia Championships 2025
ESL Pro League S22
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.