|
On March 13 2015 19:40 graNite wrote: i dont get why they wouldnt make 720p free. they get enough money from sponsored ads and twitch already, why the extra subscriptions?
yes im sure gsl is showered in money each month
..
|
On March 13 2015 19:44 graNite wrote:Show nested quote +On March 13 2015 19:42 Seeker wrote:This is good. Now no more complaints about Low quality  now we complain about medium... great and gsl still is not under that rule.
I remember that during the WCS KR seasons Mr. Chae talked about how GSL was coming back and how Blizzard would allow them to do stuff their way, maybe betwen this was one of the stuff they asked to have? It would make sense in a way for GSL to ask Blizzard for this so then can get some extra money, I don't know its a theory
|
On March 13 2015 19:52 graNite wrote:Show nested quote +On March 13 2015 19:49 Dingodile wrote:On March 13 2015 19:46 Jintoss wrote:On March 13 2015 19:44 graNite wrote: and gsl still is not under that rule. Doesn't change the fact that its 2015, and free source streams are standard. Where is free 1080? They were free ~5 yrs ago. Compare the offers from today and ~5yrs ago from any multimedia platform. exactly. i think 3 or 4 years ago dreamhack even had 1080p60hz for free I am not talking about esports alone. Look Sky (football) or maxdome or whatever. All multimedia platforms pull together.
|
Low or medium, it still sucks. No more GSL for me.
|
On March 13 2015 19:42 Jintoss wrote:Been posted before, but... ![[image loading]](http://i.gyazo.com/938c12c928a33d8240bd801ab2f09cd6.png)
**Note that meeting the requirements listed above does not automatically grant you partner status — we’d like to work with you directly to ensure your event fits well into the schedule and doesn’t overlap other partner events. Exceptions to the requirements may be made under the discretion of Blizzard.
Source: http://opcdn.battle.net/static/wcs/public/downloads/wcs-player-handbook-v1.1.1.pdf
|
Well, I'm gonna watch it regardless of quality, but this is so nice. My eyes might live longer.
|
|
that would be great! i always have trouble seeing the widow mines and zerglings
|
So excited to actually look at the screen again instead relying on Dan and Nick to choreograph the theatre of my mind.
|
weow, i might actually watch sometimes now
|
On March 13 2015 19:54 sharkie wrote:Show nested quote +On March 13 2015 19:45 life617 wrote: werent they just talking about how it was out of their control due to some sort of technical difficulties? Either way I gave up on watching GSL. Too money hungry, I understand nothing is free... They give off a feeling of greed though, the type where they would let someone suffer just so they can stack their money higher. out of their control? lol Then it would be impossible for subscribers as well  ? Clearly they were working hard day and night to fix the technical issues because they care about their fans.
|
I'm probably missing something, but why is it weird to pay a couple of bucks for 3 months and hundreds of hours of the highest level of Starcraft 2 gameplay and production. I mean, this debate has been going on for months, but I don't see a problem. Why do people feel entitled to free 720p? I mean, it's in the Blizzard book, but GSL isn't WCSKR anymore. The cost per hour of entertainment is incredibly low, the only videogame I ever paid 60$ for that I spend more than 4x the time on than on GSL is probably Skyrim.
So, in short, could anybody explain why it is weird for a large broadcasting company to ask for a pretty small sum of money?
|
On March 13 2015 20:23 SC2Toastie wrote: I'm probably missing something, but why is it weird to pay a couple of bucks for 3 months and hundreds of hours of the highest level of Starcraft 2 gameplay and production. I mean, this debate has been going on for months, but I don't see a problem. Why do people feel entitled to free 720p? I mean, it's in the Blizzard book, but GSL isn't WCSKR anymore. The cost per hour of entertainment is incredibly low, the only videogame I ever paid 60$ for that I spend more than 4x the time on than on GSL is probably Skyrim.
So, in short, could anybody explain why it is weird for a large broadcasting company to ask for a pretty small sum of money?
Because they already earn tons of money without that? It's pure greed and should not be supported in any way
|
I'm really fine with Medium, but Low was, well, too low.
|
On March 13 2015 20:27 sharkie wrote:Show nested quote +On March 13 2015 20:23 SC2Toastie wrote: I'm probably missing something, but why is it weird to pay a couple of bucks for 3 months and hundreds of hours of the highest level of Starcraft 2 gameplay and production. I mean, this debate has been going on for months, but I don't see a problem. Why do people feel entitled to free 720p? I mean, it's in the Blizzard book, but GSL isn't WCSKR anymore. The cost per hour of entertainment is incredibly low, the only videogame I ever paid 60$ for that I spend more than 4x the time on than on GSL is probably Skyrim.
So, in short, could anybody explain why it is weird for a large broadcasting company to ask for a pretty small sum of money? Because they already earn tons of money without that? It's pure greed and should not be supported in any way You have any financial statements to back that up?
Also "they already earn money" is no reason to get stuff for free. I won't get that new apple watch even if I ask really, really nicely.
|
On March 13 2015 20:23 SC2Toastie wrote: I'm probably missing something, but why is it weird to pay a couple of bucks for 3 months and hundreds of hours of the highest level of Starcraft 2 gameplay and production. I mean, this debate has been going on for months, but I don't see a problem. Why do people feel entitled to free 720p? I mean, it's in the Blizzard book, but GSL isn't WCSKR anymore. The cost per hour of entertainment is incredibly low, the only videogame I ever paid 60$ for that I spend more than 4x the time on than on GSL is probably Skyrim.
So, in short, could anybody explain why it is weird for a large broadcasting company to ask for a pretty small sum of money? free use/watch in all multimedia platforms should be standard from today's generation (blurred) view.
|
On March 13 2015 20:23 SC2Toastie wrote: I'm probably missing something, but why is it weird to pay a couple of bucks for 3 months and hundreds of hours of the highest level of Starcraft 2 gameplay and production. I mean, this debate has been going on for months, but I don't see a problem. Why do people feel entitled to free 720p? I mean, it's in the Blizzard book, but GSL isn't WCSKR anymore. The cost per hour of entertainment is incredibly low, the only videogame I ever paid 60$ for that I spend more than 4x the time on than on GSL is probably Skyrim.
So, in short, could anybody explain why it is weird for a large broadcasting company to ask for a pretty small sum of money?
It's not weird. People on the internet are just cheap and/or poor. If GSL offered free subscriptions for anyone who wrote them a letter swearing their mother was dead, you can bet that they'd receive more false letters than truthful ones.
|
It has nothing to do with the blizzard book, nerds bitch about any amount they have to pay for a digital product. People still pirate Netflix shows and music that's on Spotify. They just want free everything.
|
On March 13 2015 20:23 SC2Toastie wrote: I'm probably missing something, but why is it weird to pay a couple of bucks for 3 months and hundreds of hours of the highest level of Starcraft 2 gameplay and production. I mean, this debate has been going on for months, but I don't see a problem. Why do people feel entitled to free 720p? I mean, it's in the Blizzard book, but GSL isn't WCSKR anymore. The cost per hour of entertainment is incredibly low, the only videogame I ever paid 60$ for that I spend more than 4x the time on than on GSL is probably Skyrim.
So, in short, could anybody explain why it is weird for a large broadcasting company to ask for a pretty small sum of money? because all other tournaments give free hd
|
On March 13 2015 20:29 Dingodile wrote:Show nested quote +On March 13 2015 20:23 SC2Toastie wrote: I'm probably missing something, but why is it weird to pay a couple of bucks for 3 months and hundreds of hours of the highest level of Starcraft 2 gameplay and production. I mean, this debate has been going on for months, but I don't see a problem. Why do people feel entitled to free 720p? I mean, it's in the Blizzard book, but GSL isn't WCSKR anymore. The cost per hour of entertainment is incredibly low, the only videogame I ever paid 60$ for that I spend more than 4x the time on than on GSL is probably Skyrim.
So, in short, could anybody explain why it is weird for a large broadcasting company to ask for a pretty small sum of money? free use/watch in all multimedia platforms should be standard from today's generation (blurred) view.
On March 13 2015 20:29 contv wrote:Show nested quote +On March 13 2015 20:23 SC2Toastie wrote: I'm probably missing something, but why is it weird to pay a couple of bucks for 3 months and hundreds of hours of the highest level of Starcraft 2 gameplay and production. I mean, this debate has been going on for months, but I don't see a problem. Why do people feel entitled to free 720p? I mean, it's in the Blizzard book, but GSL isn't WCSKR anymore. The cost per hour of entertainment is incredibly low, the only videogame I ever paid 60$ for that I spend more than 4x the time on than on GSL is probably Skyrim.
So, in short, could anybody explain why it is weird for a large broadcasting company to ask for a pretty small sum of money? It's not weird. People on the internet are just cheap and/or poor. If GSL offered free subscriptions for anyone who wrote them a letter swearing their mother was dead, you can bet that they'd receive more false letters than truthful ones.
On March 13 2015 20:31 blackone wrote: It has nothing to do with the blizzard book, nerds bitch about any amount they have to pay for a digital product. People still pirate Netflix shows and music that's on Spotify. They just want free everything.
So, it seems like the three of you agree with me. It's weird to demand everything for free.
On March 13 2015 20:31 graNite wrote:Show nested quote +On March 13 2015 20:23 SC2Toastie wrote: I'm probably missing something, but why is it weird to pay a couple of bucks for 3 months and hundreds of hours of the highest level of Starcraft 2 gameplay and production. I mean, this debate has been going on for months, but I don't see a problem. Why do people feel entitled to free 720p? I mean, it's in the Blizzard book, but GSL isn't WCSKR anymore. The cost per hour of entertainment is incredibly low, the only videogame I ever paid 60$ for that I spend more than 4x the time on than on GSL is probably Skyrim.
So, in short, could anybody explain why it is weird for a large broadcasting company to ask for a pretty small sum of money? because all other tournaments give free hd Yes. So what?
Other tournaments give free HD probably because sponsors demand it for maximum exposure or because of Blizzard. GSL on the other hand has mostly Korean sponsors that don't deliver products to western markets. Isn't it normal for them to demand a bit of money for the service they provide to you?
|
|
|
|