EPTWCS KR - Up/Down Matches Group F Results - Page 2
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
Darkhorse
United States23455 Posts
| ||
|
slowbacontron
United States7722 Posts
On August 16 2013 03:04 Darkhoarse wrote: I'm sad that Hurricane didn't make it through, who incidentally, is one of the only old ESF players whose name change I approve of. It takes an effort for me to call Losira Kangho. I think FXOTear is cooler than FXOHurricane, but oh well, at least the new name is still good  | ||
|
ThePrince
Peru331 Posts
| ||
|
neptunusfisk
2286 Posts
On August 16 2013 02:18 Penev wrote: For the Korean esports organization enthusiasts: jjakji is not on an esf team | ||
|
Penev
28536 Posts
Yes, and you're not a true Korean esports organization enthusiast. + Show Spoiler + Notice how PartinG is specifically mentioned | ||
|
Bagration
United States18282 Posts
| ||
|
Grayson Carlyle
Canada219 Posts
| ||
|
Havik_
United States5585 Posts
| ||
|
Wuster
1974 Posts
On August 16 2013 07:21 Penev wrote: Yes, and you're not a true Korean esports organization enthusiast. + Show Spoiler + Notice how PartinG is specifically mentioned So you got PartinG right but Jjakji wrong... I don't think I see you point. He still correctly pointed out your mistake. Edit: Speaking of which, I'm glad Jjakji's back, he looked pretty good yesterday too. Maybe having some team stability will do wonders for his play. | ||
|
painkilla
United States695 Posts
esf = non-kespa, the correct definition. | ||
|
DavoS
United States4605 Posts
Can we get a statement from Seed about being the most irrelevant Code S champion? | ||
|
nickbradvica
United States20 Posts
| ||
|
Scarecrow
Korea (South)9175 Posts
On August 16 2013 05:36 ThePrince wrote: It takes an Effort to call Losire Kangho. Does that mean it takes a Kangho to call Hurricane a Losire? please stop | ||
|
SeraNyan
United States16 Posts
On August 16 2013 00:29 skylarr wrote: I heard effort got fucked by a bug Ya, he ran a bunch of roaches into fallen rocks seconds after they fell when KangHo destroyed them. The roaches just died, nyan. | ||
|
Darkthorn
Romania912 Posts
On August 17 2013 01:38 SeraNyan wrote: Ya, he ran a bunch of roaches into fallen rocks seconds after they fell when KangHo destroyed them. The roaches just died, nyan. it's not a bug when you kill the collapsable rocks if there is not place for the game to move the units from under the place where they fall...the said units will just die...for exemple you get rocks low...then you ff zerg units in there then kill the collapsable rocks...they all die...instant win xD | ||
|
Sogetsu
514 Posts
| ||
|
Charlie.Sheen
662 Posts
On August 16 2013 08:55 painkilla wrote: esf = non-kespa, the correct definition. By your logic, Naniwa, Stephano, Huk, are all eSF players. That's called anti-kespa mentality, just call all of them as non-kespa players, and call your self as anti-kespa fan from now on. This has absolutely nothing to do with eSF. | ||
|
Penev
28536 Posts
On August 16 2013 08:50 Wuster wrote: So you got PartinG right but Jjakji wrong... I don't think I see you point. He still correctly pointed out your mistake. Edit: Speaking of which, I'm glad Jjakji's back, he looked pretty good yesterday too. Maybe having some team stability will do wonders for his play. It wasn't a mistake. You have to know the history of the KesPA vs ESF thing aka the "the elephant in the room" thing. It's not important that it isn't completely accurate; It's actually more of a joke now, really. Replace ESF with "pioneers" if you want it to be more accurate. The pioneers being the players who left KesPA in the beginning of SC2. Many people thought (including me) that once KesPA would switch to SC2 after a certain time (my guess was after the release of HotS) their players would dominate the scene. At least until now, it's been pretty much 50/50, exactly 50/50 actually, because PartinG should be considered a pioneer. Not being a Korean esports organization enthusiast is, at least in my book, a good thing btw. I find the "YAY KESPA/ ESF" posts in the LR threads very silly. The seriously meant ones I mean. @HolyArrow: Telepathy, no doubt. xD | ||
|
HolyArrow
United States7116 Posts
On August 17 2013 03:55 Charlie.Sheen wrote: By your logic, Naniwa, Stephano, Huk, are all eSF players. That's called anti-kespa mentality, just call all of them as non-kespa players, and call your self as anti-kespa fan. This has absolutely nothing to do with eSF. You're technically right, but the eSF = non-Kespa sentiment makes sense in context of how eSF vs. Kespa first started: Kespa fanboys basically proclaiming how the BW players switching over would be better than everyone else. Everyone seems to be so caught up in eSF vs. Kespa that they've forgotten how this all even started, which is unfortunate because instead of people seeing the big picture, we get caught up in technicalities like "Oh Polt/Jjakji/etc. aren't eSF anymore" or debate on what players like Parting/Puzzle/CoCa/Jaedong really count as. Just kind of shows you how dumb the whole thing is, when people are arguing over a rivalry that doesn't even accurately reflect the origins of said rivalry. @ Penev: I like how we said essentially the same thing back to back xD | ||
|
Charlie.Sheen
662 Posts
On August 17 2013 04:14 HolyArrow wrote: You're technically right, but the eSF = non-Kespa sentiment makes sense in context of how eSF vs. Kespa first started: Kespa fanboys basically proclaiming how the BW players switching over would be better than everyone else. Everyone seems to be so caught up in eSF vs. Kespa that they've forgotten how this all even started, which is unfortunate because instead of people seeing the big picture, we get caught up in technicalities like "Oh Polt/Jjakji/etc. aren't eSF anymore" or debate on what players like Parting/Puzzle/CoCa/Jaedong really count as. Just kind of shows you how dumb the whole thing is, when people are arguing over a rivalry that doesn't even accurately reflect the origins of said rivalry. Exactly, from the origin, it is basically old BW players vs original SC2 players. Also just like many TL "elites" pointed before in lots of LR thread, there are never any eSF fans exist anyway. Then why bother with the eSF term, just call non-kespa vs kespa, that will be more intense and valid. Because there are certainly a lot of KeSPA fans exist. Just drop the eSF term in this rivalry argument from now on. | ||
| ||
