|
On July 30 2011 08:04 Excalibur_Z wrote:Show nested quote +On July 30 2011 08:03 KiF1rE wrote:On July 30 2011 07:58 R1CH wrote:On July 30 2011 07:56 King of Kings wrote:Hi Lee, even if all that is accurate and correct, this isn't going to stop certain communities from just guessing character codes and spamming players anyway. Guess from 001 to 999? I think no troll is so retarded to waste their time in this way. It's so stupid in 99% the spam cannot be seen because of Busy-Mode. I'm pretty sure there are bots that do this. You eliminate 99% of candidates since they are offline or not in game. Then you check match history on the remaining ones and you can be pretty much 99.999% accurate. even then 001 to 999 doesnt work entirely. as there are 4 digit codes out there. 4-digit codes only exist for common names like Josh, Michael, James, etc. Not for names like IMLosirA.
Since Blizzard, at least I assume, is giving MLG these accounts couldn't they give them accounts with 4 digit codes?
|
On July 30 2011 08:56 R1CH wrote: Lee has given me his reasoning in private, but I don't have enough information to know if it's technically valid or not. Erring on absolute caution, I can see why they don't want to release replays during the event. That is the problem with what MLG is doing. No reason to not release them after the event.
|
So it's all about selling replays to casters? Rather disappointed in you, MLG. =\
|
this is a real bummer that was one of the high points for MLG
|
Disappointed fan here, I loved MLG for releasing replays. It encourages fans to tune in live IMO, so they can pinpoint replays they'd benefit from watching. Hopefully they'll release replays after the event?
|
This is really really lame, at least we can see one thing that is becoming like BroodWar.. Replay hogging so others cant get better.
|
Wow. :O That's actually one of the reasons I get super excited for MLG. Kinda pisses me off... Really hope they change their mind.
Almost every other major event releases replays save for the ones with subscription fees, and they clearly don't have a problem.
I kind of hope there's a huge community uproar about this.. I wouldn't be one to start it but MLG does pay attention to the community.
|
this is incredibly unfortunate.. some form of post event release needs to be done as the release of these replays result in a worldwide increase in skill in all sc2 players who choose to watch them.
Another disappointed fan and player here.
|
On July 30 2011 10:24 Rossi wrote: this is incredibly unfortunate.. some form of post event release needs to be done as the release of these replays result in a worldwide increase in skill in all sc2 players who choose to watch them.
Another disappointed fan and player here.
This is absolutely correct, PLEASE listen to your viewers.
|
On July 30 2011 10:26 Misanthrope wrote:Show nested quote +On July 30 2011 10:24 Rossi wrote: this is incredibly unfortunate.. some form of post event release needs to be done as the release of these replays result in a worldwide increase in skill in all sc2 players who choose to watch them.
Another disappointed fan and player here. This is absolutely correct, PLEASE listen to your viewers.
I totally agree, i can safely say i wont be giving MLG my money anymore, just because replays were such a big part of the service for me.
|
On July 30 2011 10:24 Rossi wrote: this is incredibly unfortunate.. some form of post event release needs to be done as the release of these replays result in a worldwide increase in skill in all sc2 players who choose to watch them.
Another disappointed fan and player here.
I learnt so much from MMA's play last mlg, was looking forward to learning from all the new replays :'( Would be brilliant if they could release replays after it's over, but if not at least we get to see some amazing matches :D
|
On July 30 2011 05:13 kedinik wrote: I'm really curious why an SC2 replay would encode the data that makes DDoS possible. Because all rts games i know off store the ip's (encrypted or not) in the replays.
|
This is really disappointing. I fully support MLG and eSports, but I feel disappointed. Just saying.
|
On July 30 2011 08:16 Goldfish wrote: I think someone should post on the battle.net forums about this issue.
Busy (currently) does not actually prevent messages sent to that person (still causes lag if say a few dozen players are spamming the player).
Make it so there's some sort of option that prevents messages from lagging a busy player (and/or make an "Invisible" mode where you appear offline and can't be added and can't even be talked to except maybe with friends or players from a white list).
Anyone want to make to help make a battle.net thread about this? Sadly though it's Friday which usually means no blues on the weekend (not sure if it's too late or not though).
Also even if a fix doesn't hit in time, as long as the fix comes at all (for future events) then that's good enough.
|
On one of Wheat's shows they said they would release the replays after the event because they had problems with players getting messaged so much they were getting spikes so they would release the reps after the event. I don't get why they won't release them at all. That's really sad.
|
We need a sponsor from IKEA... to buy PITCHFORKS !!!
|
On July 30 2011 11:06 desrow wrote: We need a sponsor from IKEA... to buy PITCHFORKS !!!
Haha, you've got the right idea!!!
Did MLG address why they can't release the replays after the tourney, yet?
|
im all for the pitchforks idea if they dont release the replays. they dont release the replays and still people get troll messages ingame wtf.
|
I was planning on casting MLG matches all week. Guess my week just opened up..... Really dislike this news.
|
MMA vs drewbie paused because MMA is getting mass whispered. This is really helping prevent that /not. But that has already been said before.
Having said that, I have to say that it's an incredibly baller move by MLG to make this decision to maybe prevent the spamming from happening. They must have known the response they would get from the community. As a fan I don't like it, and it's not helping... but from an organisational point of view I do think it's a good move to try anything to ensure a smooth tournament.
|
|
|
|