On May 13 2011 16:11 Atlare wrote: Well with a misleading title and one line description of how you feel I recommend you actually think about what Totalbiscuit said.
IdrA is a colour-commentator. He fits all the criteria, he is analytical, he is there to provide background and extensive game knowledge, based on experience as a current/ex-player. He is there to fill in time when the play-by-play commentator is not talking and as a knowledgeable resource to back up the play-by-play commentator, who is more often than not, not a professional player/coach/ex-player, but a professional broadcaster.
Thats not slamming IdrA, thats comparing IdrA to a category in which he is already put in but the vocal minority doesn't really understand the different between Colour and Play by play and the values/advantages of each.
I think anybody trying to say IdrA is an amazing Play by Play poster is a fan boy and probably below average in the intelligence department and Totalbiscuit for Colour commentary is similar (ie. you shouldn't arguing that he can anaylse as effectively as say Day[9] or IdrA).
This isn't IdrA hate its Totalbiscuit trying to debunk the stupid fanboyism that's been shown by trolling him constantly.
Indeed. TotalBiscuit gives an advice and all the fanboys out there read through his lines in just a few seconds to know: "omfg hes bashing idra" --- Oo
On May 13 2011 16:40 Headshot wrote: TotalBiscuit's pure play-by-play style is extremely unappealing. He's in no position to comment on anyone else's commentary.
Excuse me but you and anyone else in this thread who shares this opinion obviously did not take the time to read the OP. The man is a professional caster and by pretty much any standard really good at what he does and knows how to go at it and what actually revolves around casting.
What he took the time to write there substantiates that. If your personal preference as a fan or otherwise focusses on Idra that's one thing but that is purely on content not on the art of casting itself which is where he is aiming at in his writing. Personally I fully agree with him about Idra being a horrible caster but he is great to have at the table to add certain insight moments during the game and between game and post game discussion from a meta perspective.
Keep in mind what the man tried to bring across here before responding blindly to it.
What this game needs is more duo's or especially trio's in the spirit of tastosis. One very good colour caster and two play by play casters. The important thing is chemistry. What tastosis has going for it as just a duo is how artosis is great at colour and play by play casting while tasteless just sets up for artosis with his remarks, mistakes and jokes.
I'm actually surprised we haven't seen a great casting duo or especially trio pop up yet. I'm having high hopes for Kaldor as well in the future as I have been really enjoying his casting, even though its play by play.
p.s. The horde of fanboism that takes this so personal is getting ridiculous in my opinion. You can't even critique a certain person anymore without running into thousands of fanatics who blindly jump to conclusions and reply with physical threats and gross insults.
On May 13 2011 16:36 Samhax wrote: I partially agree with TB, he is right when he says Idra should not tell the game is over, when the players are still playing the game. It's kinda anticlimatic. BUT i love idra's casting because he give some really good insight in term of strategy and the different paths a player could take to win the game. There is only one who have a smiliar value when casting, it's Artosis. And seriously i prefer a billion times casters like Idra or Artosis than someone who has a good energy and enthusiasm but don't have a clue about the strategies.
I think casters like Idra are good for the game but i don't think we gonna see more because you have to be really good at the game to cast like Idra do.
Casters that are really good at analyse the game are Artosis, Idra and Gretorp.
That's stupid. That's like an NBA commentator saying the game is close should the Lakers be beating the Heat by 30 points. It's not close and it's not exciting unless you're a fan of one of the participants and just want to see them roll face. Traditionally, people who do play by play are not loved but tolerated when they know their role and don't overstep it. This is why when you only have a person who is doing play by play for 85% of the game and analysing for 15% of the game people get turned off and have to mute the cast.
You also need to know the difference between a caster and a commentator, something TB tries to educate ignorant people on.
you NEED to keep it interesting, it is entertaintment, as soon as you give up the finale, people lose intrest and watch something else, YOU NEED TO KEEP THEM TUNED IN! calling a game 10 minutes before it ends makes me not want to watch anymore. when there's a hint of a miraculous comeback, as a casual gamer you'd be much more inclined to stay and watch. it's then the casters duty to keep you entertained for the rest of the match.
I don't know, it feels like the community wants to have the cake and eat it as well. I seem recall a lot of posts bashing some casters for stating GG a few minutes in advance. I believe Tastosis does that a lot. But when Idra does it, that's something people have been asking for all the time? Also, people seem to love how the Korean commentators get excited, so much that some people like to watch games with korean commentary only for that excitement factor. But when other people try to go high gear, it's no longer desireable? I don't particularly like TB that much, but I do like the intensity he brings to a cast, regardless whether he's wrong or right. Listening to Idra doesn't do it for me at all.
Now, no caster will appeal to everyone, but some consistency of opinion might be in order here. How can a caster adjust to please a greater audience when these conflicting signals keep being sent?
On May 13 2011 16:38 Aberu wrote: I think this was just TB trying to get back at EG. He had that problem with iNcontroL a while ago, and flew off the handle generating bad press for himself over and over. He's doing it again. I like TotalBiscuit, but I'm starting to dislike him with crap like this and where it brings his reputation.
This is a ridiculous notion. TB is much more professional than that. The entire debacle between him and Incontrol are essentially forgotten, except for a few people who somehow want to have a go at TB for no reason at all.
Not that I dispute your main point, but TB is definitely not "professional" when he posts on Reddit. He has a history of trolling, insulting and belittling when provoked.
People hating on TB: Just mute him like I do. If you're good enough to be bothered by the casual level commentaries then you're good enough to watch while listening to music.
For the love of god I hope he does not cast IPL season 2 - and I think I speak for the majority.
We know the game and do not want dumb-downed Starcraft.
speak for yourself.
i find TB to be entertaining. he's definitely no idra, or artosis, or tasteless, or day[9], but he's still a great caster. he'll probably be more well-liked if he was paired with analytical casters, but seriously, this guy's hilarious.
TotalBiscuit, you are such a hypocrite. Time and time again throughout the Reddit thread you have admonished users for immediately dismissing opinions with no backbone, yet time and time again, I have seen you do the same. Which is it? Whenever someone critiques your work, you immediately retort by calling them a troll. People in this community will have opinions; some will like you, and some will not. However, you do not have to respond to every single hater by calling them out with random insults if you have nothing constructive to say--you are simply sinking to the low levels of those who do the same to you.
I dunno. It may be because I have a BW background, where play by play was a big part of what casting was, but I enjoy having someone try to build up suspense. I almost think the production tab takes away from that in a sense: the suspense of "oh my god, was he researching mines or siege mode as the enemy moves in for an attack" made watching BW such a great experience. Remember, the point of a sport is to be entertaining. The mark of a good play by play announcer is to go beyond what is happening and describe the game in a way that is entertaining.
Analysis can also be a part of the commentating process. However, unlike play by play, having only an analyst makes for a boring cast: its like a lesson, not entertainment. The right mix is key: having a play by play caster build suspense, then after a battle, while the dust settles and both players rebuild, use that dead time to analyze the past and what both players may do in the future.
I definitely agree that casters need to stop with the whole "well, thats gg, game over, move on" even if the game is for all intents and purposes over. I consider myself to be a high level observer. I know when games are over. Yet a good caster can do his best to hide just how desperate the situation is for one player. Again: casting is entertainment, not a learning experience. Something like the NASL is much different than a Day9 daily. You tune into one to learn, one to be entertained. Sure, having idra on to fill in the dead time is great for possibly learning something. But I definitely believe that tipping that scale too far in that direction is actually bad for the entertainment value as a whole.
After a year or so of SC2 casting I think most people will agree that the best available set up is a dual cast where one person is highly-analytical and the other person is whatever-it-is that tasteless and djwheat and those sorts of guys do. The people who are complimenting idra's casts are exactly right: he does analysis better than anybody. Maybe his presentation isn't perfect but content is 90% of the ballgame anyway for analysis. I think most people would agree that Idra solo-cast would be interesting but not a good setup for a tournament cast.
That said, I think the big problem with the guys who aren't "analysis" guys, is when they start doing analysis anyway. And it's wrong. A lot. But that's to be expected The non-analysis guys don't tend to be very strong players and, well, it's really hard to follow a pro-game in real time and say insightful things.
TLDR: Dual casts are best. Analysis guys needs to be really good at analysis. Non-analysis guys need to stop analyzing.
On May 13 2011 16:31 jalstar wrote: I don't think you can compare e-sports to traditional sports in terms of casting, and I really wish TB and others would stop doing it. In every sport out there, it's just as easy to score points when you're down by 20 as when the game's tied. In SC, leads build on leads and incredibly subtle things can change the flow of the game. Good commentary, like Idra, points out those subtleties and gives the viewer insight into the complexities of the game.
I also don't think there's any room for play-by-play. In traditional sports PBP adds something, whether it's the speed and type of pitches in baseball or formations in football. In chess or SC2 you're just re-stating things that are incredibly obvious to the viewer if you do PBP, so you need people who can analyze the game or you quickly run out of meaningful things to talk about.
Just my 2 cents.
AGREED.
Play by play should be kept to a minimum. Why? Cause that's the observer's job. It's not like you're watching the entire map and need to be told what to do. The person doing the 'play by play' is your observer in the match who tells you visually what's going on whether it's highlighting the harvester difference or highlighting different things on the production tab like research or expansions etc. You don't need the play by play guy to talk for more than 30% of the cast unless they're actually funny (something most casters aren't in the slightest). So when you have someone like TB or Husky who feel that it is necessary to talk for every single second of the cast at a rate of 300 words per minute I just get pissed/annoyed and mute them.
I disagree with the assessment that there is no need for play by play in eSports. The cameramen and the production crew present physical sports in generally much clearer ways then observers who ofttimes miss things do. I can clearly see Kesler is passing to Raymond whose carrying the puck up the wing and then getting pinched into the boards by Weber. That doesn't invalidate the play by play man's call of the play. I don't need the play by play when I'm sitting in Roger's Arena watching a game live because the crowd is providing a level of emotion and connection to the game. However, when sitting at home, it brings another level to the experience when I'm by myself or with a few friends/family watching the game.
Words can help enhance the experience and a good play by play man can generally up the level of a game if he's skilled at his job.
When it's 1v1 it's easier to see what's going on though. I shouldn't make this sports vs e-sports, it's team vs 1v1 and there's definitely not enough play-by-play in CS commentaries for example. You won't hear "Roger Federer is running to the right" in any tennis commentary though, they'll focus more on analyzing.
Being able to analyze a player's long term strategy is a more-than-adequate substitute for play-by-play since it will interest me and captivate me for longer.
One thing is that Idra is IDRA, he is a superstar. People will watch just to hear him commentate, his knowledge of the game is exceptional. I don't Think Totalbiscuit was attacking Idra in anyway but I was watching the same Casts from NASL personally I have to say if you were thinking of Idra cast with emotion and that "flare" than you sir must be crazy. He shouldn't try to fake it or I think it would have come off a lot worst than Idra trying to cast in his own style.
I admit the post came off as 1 sided as I expected people to read the link when I said I only quoted a snippit.
The article was saying IdrA has some good points as a caster, then TB posts his comment saying why IdrA isn't a good caster, and somehow that's ok because he's a "colour-commentator" then goes on to list things that IdrA did wrong (hence my "slam" claims). It just seems like he was bashing IdrA's casting while hiding behind the compliment that he isn't a caster (which isn't even TB's call to make). IdrA is a bad caster, but that's OK because I'm branding him as the colour-commentator. TB also makes this post sound like IdrA was casting NASL by himself, which he wasn't. He also makes assumptions on what the people want to see as well as their knowledge of the game: "Hardcore players will not learn anything from this. Casual players more often than not, don’t WANT to learn anything from this" in regards to calling an early GG and why.
Wow...how come 90% of the people here are not understand what TB is saying... this is no rocket science. He's not bashing Idra in any way whatsoever. WTF are you guys drinking? TB is the most awesome caster the in sc2 scene and he's completely right in his post.