|
On August :10 CatZ.root wrote:Show nested quote +On August :48 TheAntZ wrote:On August :43 CatZ.root wrote: LOOOOOOOOOOOL, be patient, brothers of the swarm. Blizzard shall do us justice. <3 Dmytro, way to send a message <3 are you now more of a root team manager or are you still playing a lot? if you are still palying a lot and sticking with zerg, nice! its really quite disheartening to see all these players switch race for balance issues. I can understand why with huge money to be won and sponsorships to maintain, but still...if people stuck to zerg maybe something would 'click' like it did for protoss in BW in pvz (forge FE). that took a looong time to perfect too I never really liked dimaga as a player though, seemed like an allin player from i do both play and manage, both quite a bit :D. blizzard WILL take action soon, worry not
Catz was playing on BiggerTs stream for the IEM last night, he played very unorthdox (think fast infestor harras) and it was great to watch. Unfortunetly he lost to bad scouting, it would be great to see him play some more.
|
Sweden33719 Posts
On August 16 2010 19:24 Geo.Rion wrote:Show nested quote +On August 16 2010 19:14 IdrA wrote:On August 16 2010 09:44 Liquid`Jinro wrote:On August 16 2010 09:06 IdrA wrote:On August 16 2010 06:59 Liquid`Jinro wrote:On August 16 2010 06:27 Boblion wrote:On August 16 2010 05:41 bokeevboke wrote: Go4sc2 pretty much proves Dimaga's decision. He loses 2 games of bo5 to Demuslim with regular races and comes ahead 3-2 after they switch their races. I'm not that sure. Imo Demuslim ( war 3 ) is just not as good with Z ( the only race with true bw style macro ) than Dimaga is with Terran. It could be a matter of play style. If you look at their game history, Demuslim (Z) beat Dimaga (T) 7-4 yesterday night. So who cares. + Show Spoiler [Gosucup] +Dimaga just beat SjoW 2-0 or something in gosucup quarters. Oh noes teh imba. people take what you write seriously. dont do that. I'm saying that dimaga and demuslim playing their off-races doesn't mean shit. Unless you are refering to the spoiler. i am the fact that dimaga beating sjow could be considered meaningful shows just how silly terran is. :D Well said, Dimaga is probably higher on Europe's best Zergs list then Sjow is on Sweeeden's best terrans. NO offense to Sjow, it's just a compliment for Sweedish Terrans data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c81e3/c81e334f952fa6a3b77a0f55297a8c05972c04b5" alt="" SjoW is probably the 2nd best T in sweden (behind MorroW). Tho I don't really know what his TvZ is like, and I think he told me its his worst if my memory is correct.
|
On August 17 2010 01:26 Liquid`Jinro wrote:Show nested quote +On August 16 2010 19:24 Geo.Rion wrote:On August 16 2010 19:14 IdrA wrote:On August 16 2010 09:44 Liquid`Jinro wrote:On August 16 2010 09:06 IdrA wrote:On August 16 2010 06:59 Liquid`Jinro wrote:On August 16 2010 06:27 Boblion wrote:On August 16 2010 05:41 bokeevboke wrote: Go4sc2 pretty much proves Dimaga's decision. He loses 2 games of bo5 to Demuslim with regular races and comes ahead 3-2 after they switch their races. I'm not that sure. Imo Demuslim ( war 3 ) is just not as good with Z ( the only race with true bw style macro ) than Dimaga is with Terran. It could be a matter of play style. If you look at their game history, Demuslim (Z) beat Dimaga (T) 7-4 yesterday night. So who cares. + Show Spoiler [Gosucup] +Dimaga just beat SjoW 2-0 or something in gosucup quarters. Oh noes teh imba. people take what you write seriously. dont do that. I'm saying that dimaga and demuslim playing their off-races doesn't mean shit. Unless you are refering to the spoiler. i am the fact that dimaga beating sjow could be considered meaningful shows just how silly terran is. :D Well said, Dimaga is probably higher on Europe's best Zergs list then Sjow is on Sweeeden's best terrans. NO offense to Sjow, it's just a compliment for Sweedish Terrans data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c81e3/c81e334f952fa6a3b77a0f55297a8c05972c04b5" alt="" SjoW is probably the 2nd best T in sweden (behind MorroW). Tho I don't really know what his TvZ is like, and I think he told me its his worst if my memory is correct.
Thats a lie.
your are the best terran in sweden
|
I respect Dimaga, as his an elite player compared to me. But seriously, to go out and cry about how "overpowered" Terran is, and how Zerg is "underpowered". Last time I checked ultras/broods were not "underpowered".
|
On August 17 2010 02:06 Zurope wrote: I respect Dimaga, as his an elite player compared to me. But seriously, to go out and cry about how "overpowered" Terran is, and how Zerg is "underpowered". Last time I checked ultras/broods were not "underpowered". Last time I checked, TvZ wasn't imbalanced in the lategame, it was the early game that was the problem.
|
On August 17 2010 02:06 Zurope wrote: I respect Dimaga, as his an elite player compared to me. But seriously, to go out and cry about how "overpowered" Terran is, and how Zerg is "underpowered". Last time I checked ultras/broods were not "underpowered".
Try again. No one's arguing that ultras or broodlords are underpowered. Read the OP. You don't start the game with Ultras/Broodlords.
|
blizzard official state is that at 200/200 army count zerg should loose both to terrans and protoss .
so its both early and late game and this doesnt make any reason imo.
If all things equall a race that starts as weak as zerg should be much tougher to beat at late game but is the opposite and this isnt theorycrafting or any other bs but officially claims.
so if zerg is weak at start and weak at the end whats the point rly.
|
I know Blizzard said they were going to balance the multiplayer from the start, but maybe they're making Terran the best on purpose, since this is the terran portion of the three releases? I mean, how can they be so blind, with so many influential people in the community saying Zerg early game is broken? There is obviously a problem with ZvT, maybe this is by design...Just a random thought I had the other day.
|
On August 17 2010 02:07 Jyvblamo wrote:Show nested quote +On August 17 2010 02:06 Zurope wrote: I respect Dimaga, as his an elite player compared to me. But seriously, to go out and cry about how "overpowered" Terran is, and how Zerg is "underpowered". Last time I checked ultras/broods were not "underpowered". Last time I checked, TvZ wasn't imbalanced in the lategame, it was the early game that was the problem.
It is imbalanced in the lategame... for Zerg. That fact is just ignored by the hordes of Z whiners.
|
One thing I haven't seen addressed yet is PvT. I have to wait 3 days before I can make a thread and ZvT is clearly a much bigger issue then PvT but Protoss has a damn hard time trying to keep up with Terran too. Chrono boosting helps us get units out faster yes but where is our help economic wise? Zergs are notorious for getting resources quick and Terrans have MULEs,which after watching Greenforest last night and seeing 3 of qxc's MULEs outperform 34 of iNKA's probes, that pretty much propeled them to Zerg's level of economy if not just under it in my opinion which makes the Protoss situation even harder based on the fact that our basic units cost so much along with the build times for buildings,research times,and the costs of affording all that while managing a steady army or having an army to counter a Terran plus spreading our chrono boost out to speed our research and unit production up is damn near impossible because of how cheap their low tier army is and how cheap their low tier upgrades(most of their upgrades in general) are such as Combat shield,Concussive shells,Stimpack,etc.Where are all the little upgrades for low tier units on Protoss? How do we counter an early game Stimpack/Concussive shell micro? Marauders dominate Zealots with the shells and they dominate Stalkers after they kite your Zealots to death. The best thing we have is a Sentry to force field behind them which if you dont completely block them off they'll just run right around back to their base to be healed and costs 100 vespene gas taking away from the ability to get more Stalkers to even possibly range Marauders and Marines. Not to mention Marines have ridiculously good DPS.
|
On August 17 2010 02:13 jlr5175 wrote: One thing I haven't seen addressed yet is PvT. I have to wait 3 days before I can make a thread and ZvT is clearly a much bigger issue then PvT but Protoss has a damn hard time trying to keep up with Terran too. Chrono boosting helps us get units out faster yes but where is our help economic wise? Zergs are notorious for getting resources quick and Terrans have MULEs,which after watching Greenforest last night and seeing 3 of qxc's MULEs outperform 34 of iNKA's probes, that pretty much propeled them to Zerg's level of economy if not just under it in my opinion which makes the Protoss situation even harder based on the fact that our basic units cost so much along with the build times for buildings,research times,and the costs of affording all that while managing a steady army or having an army to counter a Terran plus spreading our chrono boost out to speed our research and unit production up is damn near impossible because of how cheap their low tier army is and how cheap their low tier upgrades(most of their upgrades in general) are such as Combat shield,Concussive shells,Stimpack,etc.Where are all the little upgrades for low tier units on Protoss? How do we counter an early game Stimpack/Concussive shell micro? Marauders dominate Zealots with the shells and they dominate Stalkers after they kite your Zealots to death. The best thing we have is a Sentry to force field behind them which if you dont completely block them off they'll just run right around back to their base to be healed and costs 100 vespene gas taking away from the ability to get more Stalkers to even possibly range Marauders and Marines. Not to mention Marines have ridiculously good DPS.
This a joke? PvT if anything is imbalanced in favor of P outside of the ghost/no HT window.
|
On August 17 2010 02:13 oxxo wrote:Show nested quote +On August 17 2010 02:07 Jyvblamo wrote:On August 17 2010 02:06 Zurope wrote: I respect Dimaga, as his an elite player compared to me. But seriously, to go out and cry about how "overpowered" Terran is, and how Zerg is "underpowered". Last time I checked ultras/broods were not "underpowered". Last time I checked, TvZ wasn't imbalanced in the lategame, it was the early game that was the problem. It is imbalanced in the lategame... for Zerg. That fact is just ignored by the hordes of Z whiners.
maybe u missed the fact that Blizzard officially said that at max armies zerg has the weakest one .
i mean zerg top tech units are the only one that cant shoot air , what more obvious .
just saying
|
On August 17 2010 02:15 st3roids wrote:Show nested quote +On August 17 2010 02:13 oxxo wrote:On August 17 2010 02:07 Jyvblamo wrote:On August 17 2010 02:06 Zurope wrote: I respect Dimaga, as his an elite player compared to me. But seriously, to go out and cry about how "overpowered" Terran is, and how Zerg is "underpowered". Last time I checked ultras/broods were not "underpowered". Last time I checked, TvZ wasn't imbalanced in the lategame, it was the early game that was the problem. It is imbalanced in the lategame... for Zerg. That fact is just ignored by the hordes of Z whiners. maybe u missed the fact that Blizzard officially said that at max armies zerg has the weakest one . just saying
Zerg will always have the weakest 200/200 army, because in a 200/200 fight where both armies cancel out zerg is on top because it has FAR superior production.
|
On August 17 2010 02:06 Zurope wrote: I respect Dimaga, as his an elite player compared to me. But seriously, to go out and cry about how "overpowered" Terran is, and how Zerg is "underpowered". Last time I checked ultras/broods were not "underpowered". To address another aspect of your post which kind of misses the point, dimaga isn't just crying over imbalance like so many others are. In fact, he is doing exactly what so many terran players have suggested to Zerg "Whiners"... as in "If you think Terran is so OP, why don't you just play them?" He is taking concrete action to support his views, something which I thinks sends a very strong message. Fully support this move.
|
On August 17 2010 02:17 Nyx wrote:Show nested quote +On August 17 2010 02:15 st3roids wrote:On August 17 2010 02:13 oxxo wrote:On August 17 2010 02:07 Jyvblamo wrote:On August 17 2010 02:06 Zurope wrote: I respect Dimaga, as his an elite player compared to me. But seriously, to go out and cry about how "overpowered" Terran is, and how Zerg is "underpowered". Last time I checked ultras/broods were not "underpowered". Last time I checked, TvZ wasn't imbalanced in the lategame, it was the early game that was the problem. It is imbalanced in the lategame... for Zerg. That fact is just ignored by the hordes of Z whiners. maybe u missed the fact that Blizzard officially said that at max armies zerg has the weakest one . just saying Zerg will always have the weakest 200/200 army, because in a 200/200 fight where both armies cancel out zerg is on top because it has FAR superior production.
Ultras and Broodlords rape basically every single ground army there is. Late game isn't really the issue for zerg at all. It's breaking fortified positions and surviving till late game. In fact Ultras are so OP is scary. Blizzard basically made every unit that should counter them no longer do so.
|
On August 17 2010 02:13 oxxo wrote:Show nested quote +On August 17 2010 02:13 jlr5175 wrote: One thing I haven't seen addressed yet is PvT. I have to wait 3 days before I can make a thread and ZvT is clearly a much bigger issue then PvT but Protoss has a damn hard time trying to keep up with Terran too. Chrono boosting helps us get units out faster yes but where is our help economic wise? Zergs are notorious for getting resources quick and Terrans have MULEs,which after watching Greenforest last night and seeing 3 of qxc's MULEs outperform 34 of iNKA's probes, that pretty much propeled them to Zerg's level of economy if not just under it in my opinion which makes the Protoss situation even harder based on the fact that our basic units cost so much along with the build times for buildings,research times,and the costs of affording all that while managing a steady army or having an army to counter a Terran plus spreading our chrono boost out to speed our research and unit production up is damn near impossible because of how cheap their low tier army is and how cheap their low tier upgrades(most of their upgrades in general) are such as Combat shield,Concussive shells,Stimpack,etc.Where are all the little upgrades for low tier units on Protoss? How do we counter an early game Stimpack/Concussive shell micro? Marauders dominate Zealots with the shells and they dominate Stalkers after they kite your Zealots to death. The best thing we have is a Sentry to force field behind them which if you dont completely block them off they'll just run right around back to their base to be healed and costs 100 vespene gas taking away from the ability to get more Stalkers to even possibly range Marauders and Marines. Not to mention Marines have ridiculously good DPS. This a joke? PvT if anything is imbalanced in favor of P outside of the ghost/no HT window. How is it imbalanced in favor of Protoss? Explain. Collossi are countered by super-range Vikings and with the Mech support range that Terran usually brings around its bio ball and ghosts you cant directly push. High Templars are great and all but they wont save you from the supreme range of the mech and the constant medivac healing/scv repairing that terran usually encompasses within its army. Immortals are powerful yes but when they get focus fired they go down quick. Void Rays are OP in numbers and UP in smaller numbers. The whole charging up thing is a bad idea and doesnt fit into RTS play at all. Just make the Void ray a regular damn piece of aircraft and make its damage stay at the same level instead of raising overtime that it's charging.
|
On August 17 2010 02:17 Nyx wrote:Show nested quote +On August 17 2010 02:15 st3roids wrote:On August 17 2010 02:13 oxxo wrote:On August 17 2010 02:07 Jyvblamo wrote:On August 17 2010 02:06 Zurope wrote: I respect Dimaga, as his an elite player compared to me. But seriously, to go out and cry about how "overpowered" Terran is, and how Zerg is "underpowered". Last time I checked ultras/broods were not "underpowered". Last time I checked, TvZ wasn't imbalanced in the lategame, it was the early game that was the problem. It is imbalanced in the lategame... for Zerg. That fact is just ignored by the hordes of Z whiners. maybe u missed the fact that Blizzard officially said that at max armies zerg has the weakest one . just saying Zerg will always have the weakest 200/200 army, because in a 200/200 fight where both armies cancel out zerg is on top because it has FAR superior production.
superior production ... u mean mass speedlings ... cause with the gas cost of zerg units , this is what mass production means for zerg.
Have u watching any pro games , the supply food in both is usually at about roughly the same.
also what stops a good terran to make 10 barracks and 5 stargates , they only cost mineral and with mules u have thousands of supply just sitting there.
the argument that zerg can mass armies and the others cannot is just a myth just like that koreans are doing great as zerg .
|
Iraq1230 Posts
i think the maps are a bigger reasons to the success terrans are having atm. some maps are just autowins for terran.
|
People who bring up how zerg can just insta rebuild their army, need to just be ignored... it's not like protoss cant instantly warp in their own army to the battlefield with a pylon and enough warpgates, or the fact that right after that terran army that just ran over your forces cant just do it again, while having his reinforcements there in time to replace what you killed.
When zerg sees the benefit from being able to use their larvae to produce units is usually when they get the tech for a new unit (because now they can make a bunch of it at once) or if they have been droning up, then finally see their enemy leaving the base etc, and can make their army right there on the fly. When you get the 200/200 food battles, you can bet your ass your enemy at this point has more than enough production facilities to replace his army relatively quickly, or at the very least be able to spend all his minerals. Saying zerg should be up 3 bases over his opponent so he can just spam the shit out of units is just ridiculous...
|
sadly there will be nothing but tweaks between now and Heart of the Swarm.
Will zerg regain the menacing look and stop looking so darn cute soon or in a patch? probably not, but hey we're cute... I wanna squeeze a drone to death right now to get rid of all the anger i have for imbalance.
But the zerg will most likely gain units to deal with current balance issues? Probably not because Blizz doesn't see there being an issue. They will gain units, only within moderate amount of balance compared to original units and based off the balance of the new units. Which the synergy created between new and old will most likely create some sort of major balance issues. More on that in 12-18 months when the expansion is talked about.
Zerg's composition is horrible right now. The least amount of units and a reactionary race that doesn't have the tools to counter. Turrets + Vikings + Highground siege tanks = win
The game is changing, in the first week it was 14 pool 15 hatch... Now if you do that a fast hellion roasts your units as part of the 1/1/1 build -before tech lab/reactor on the factory, just as part of a standard scout/harass unit also much better spent than going reapers.
Now zerg one bases till speedlings come out and then expands, but it's still not enough, that only survives initial harassment. The zerg needs their units adjusted. In all honestly a supply change IMO won't fix the issues of unbalanced units. What needs to be changed? I don't know, im just a high platinum low diamond player. my opinion is my opinion but it's better than nothing(which is what actiblizzard is doing):
Lurker needs to be in the game as tier 2. Make it research from a hydra den and the lurker evolves from the hydra unit (like blings). Hydras need to be 1 supply and lurkers 2.
NP needs to work while burrowed and keep the 'channeling' aspect where you can't move but last until it's broken. Or in the worst case make it drain energy ala cloak. No more of this unborrowed 15 second BS unless you glitch the game and cast it as you're burrowing.
These won't break the game and be OP as Ravens and scans can reveal burrowed units. Observers (tier2) are also available.
|
|
|
|