EPT2021 - 2022 Football Thread - Page 86
| Forum Index > Sports |
New Thread Is Live - Click Here | ||
|
{CC}StealthBlue
United States41117 Posts
| ||
|
Deleted User 173346
16169 Posts
| ||
|
sharkie
Austria18707 Posts
Glasgow, Scotland – Celtic's new Japanese signing Reo Hatate bagged a brace in the Old Firm derby on Wednesday, taking center stage in a 3-0 win over Rangers in the Scottish Premiership. https://www.japantimes.co.jp/sports/2022/02/03/soccer/hatate-brace-old-firm/ Japanse nobody just arrives and takes Celtic to lead in the table over Rangers | ||
Liquid`Drone
Norway28869 Posts
On February 03 2022 11:38 {CC}StealthBlue wrote: Game is over and USMNT won 3-0 but this was a very bad decision to play a game in such a place. https://twitter.com/jennyachiu/status/1489064813821140994 https://twitter.com/GrantWahl/status/1489068660815716354 lol wtf they played in Minnesota in the beginning of February? There's a reason why the Norwegian and Swedish leagues are paused during the winter.. | ||
|
Bacillus
Finland2072 Posts
On February 03 2022 17:20 Liquid`Drone wrote: lol wtf they played in Minnesota in the beginning of February? There's a reason why the Norwegian and Swedish leagues are paused during the winter.. I think the Finnish HJK played their Europa League games indoors on some kind of turf. Far from ideal, but better than playing outdoors. And that was still group stage, so nowhere close to mid-winter. | ||
|
Kotreb
Croatia1392 Posts
| ||
|
{CC}StealthBlue
United States41117 Posts
| ||
|
Sermokala
United States14159 Posts
But yeah this was stupid. I was there I took my shirt off, but there's a very good reason why they don't do CONCACAF in the north American winter or MLS in the winter. This was a combination of years of oppressive midday central American games, Qatar and covid forcing a short qualifying window. And no one objecting to Canada pulling the exact same shit in worse conditions. | ||
|
Mafe
Germany5966 Posts
| ||
Pandemona
Charlie Sheens House51493 Posts
| ||
|
DropBear
Australia4415 Posts
The final boss for each other | ||
GTR
51651 Posts
| ||
|
Deleted User 173346
16169 Posts
| ||
|
{CC}StealthBlue
United States41117 Posts
https://imgur.com/a/GUo2uMO | ||
|
evilfatsh1t
Australia8912 Posts
| ||
|
LennX
4570 Posts
On February 05 2022 10:55 {CC}StealthBlue wrote: It helps VAR "missed" this? https://imgur.com/a/GUo2uMO VAR didn't miss it Following a revision of the interpretation of the rule by IFAB during the summer, accidental handball is only penalised if the player in question then scores a goal. So, although the ball clearly hit Watmore's hand before he lobbed the decisive pass to Crooks, referee Anthony Taylor deemed it to be accidental, as the ball had flicked up off the Middlesbrough man's body. This was subsequently checked by VAR Stuart Attwell, who endorsed Taylor's view. https://www.bbc.com/sport/football/60266339 The result stings though given that it was almost a full strength Utd side | ||
|
evilfatsh1t
Australia8912 Posts
watmore made a poor first touch and he benefited from the handball with a completely outstretched arm by bringing the ball back into his control for an immediate assist. if thats not gonna be called handball nothing should be called handball. | ||
|
mahrgell
Germany3943 Posts
| ||
|
KobraKay
Portugal4367 Posts
On February 05 2022 15:06 mahrgell wrote: Oh yeah, lets have the annual "what is intentional" discussion, even though that part is nearly unchanged since forever... And yes, all those jumping jack cross-blocking defenders are considered intentional. while i agree with the sentiment, the rest of your quote is wrong. the handball recommendations for interpretation have changed several times over the last couple of years, heck the one currently in place is like 1yo. it might seem similar to a 7 yo rule, but several changes were made in between. as an example, 3 or 4 years ago the recommended analysis was in relation to the player's volume (there is a specific term but i cant recall how to say it in EN) increasing or not due to arm position. cant recall if before or after that, it was every contact that had an impact on the outcome of the play. now there is space for the intentional or not interpretation, which is something that was not on the previous one. | ||
|
mahrgell
Germany3943 Posts
On February 05 2022 18:03 KobraKay wrote: while i agree with the sentiment, the rest of your quote is wrong. the handball recommendations for interpretation have changed several times over the last couple of years, heck the one currently in place is like 1yo. it might seem similar to a 7 yo rule, but several changes were made in between. as an example, 3 or 4 years ago the recommended analysis was in relation to the player's volume (there is a specific term but i cant recall how to say it in EN) increasing or not due to arm position. cant recall if before or after that, it was every contact that had an impact on the outcome of the play. now there is space for the intentional or not interpretation, which is something that was not on the previous one. I'm aware of those changes, but they do really not concern that 90% of handballs, where the interpretation of intentional (what you said about body surface) remained pretty much the same. Those changes were to my knowledge mostly aimed at header duels, where the ball dropped down and since jumping with arms completely tied to your body is nearly impossible always led to the craziest kinds of penalties. When it comes to blocking crosses, which is the majority of pens, not much has changed, except in some odd cases of players getting annihilated from 1m distance. | ||
| ||
