EPTOmggggg, this rule is so bad, it didn't give Liquid'Jinro a bigger advantage against TT1.
I thought this was funny
MLG Dallas Day 3 - Page 220
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
Huko
United States324 Posts
Omggggg, this rule is so bad, it didn't give Liquid'Jinro a bigger advantage against TT1. I thought this was funny | ||
|
Yngvi
Netherlands70 Posts
| ||
|
ZerOfy
United Kingdom405 Posts
On November 08 2010 06:38 Tennet wrote: Grand Finals should just be a Bo7 +1 User was warned for this post | ||
|
NevilleS
Canada266 Posts
| ||
|
blade55555
United States17423 Posts
On November 08 2010 06:36 Callanish wrote: Where does the "(someone) FIGHTING!" thing come from anyways? Korea in BW thats what players did before games start. | ||
|
Shikyo
Finland33997 Posts
On November 08 2010 06:35 HolydaKing wrote: Yes. It doesn't make any sense and can't be like this... there must be something mixed up. What's mixed up is the missing second Bo3 because in DE format you must lose 2 sets to get knocked out. However, they probably think being disadvantaged in one extended series and having to win another Bo3 after that would be too rough for the LB player. Maybe it's time to realize their format sucks then, if they can't follow it correctly? | ||
|
DizzyDrone
Netherlands629 Posts
I hope they revise these rules for the next tournament, the entire extended series rule just seems weird and overly complicated. They don't take games played in previous tournaments into account, why should they take games played in pevious rounds into account? | ||
|
Redmark
Canada2129 Posts
On November 08 2010 06:38 Huko wrote: Omggggg, this rule is so bad, it gave PainUser a unfair advantage against Liquid`Tyler. Omggggg, this rule is so bad, it didn't give Liquid'Jinro a bigger advantage against TT1. I thought this was funny not understanding sure is funny | ||
|
mindspike
Canada1902 Posts
On November 08 2010 06:36 DoubleLariat wrote: Tis not the point - it's the fact that the person who gets the advantage in the LB gets an advantage over every other player in the LB that is facing someone that they didn't face in the WB. More people are unfairly affected by the existence of the extended series rule than by it's elimination. For the greater good (and all that jazz.) Good point but he has a point too. Getting knocked out by someone who you won more games from can be considered unfair. | ||
|
Baarn
United States2702 Posts
| ||
|
Deleted User 3420
24492 Posts
On November 08 2010 06:38 Huko wrote: Omggggg, this rule is so bad, it gave PainUser a unfair advantage against Liquid`Tyler. Omggggg, this rule is so bad, it didn't give Liquid'Jinro a bigger advantage against TT1. I thought this was funny that's not the complaint dude... /facepalm the complaint isn't that it didn't give jinro a "bigger advantage" it's that it gave him a SMALLER advantage than he would have if the rule simply didn't exist. | ||
|
Serpico
4285 Posts
Seriously, just reset the rules once you get to the grand finals or something. | ||
|
ston23
United States4 Posts
On November 08 2010 06:36 humblegar wrote: Every rule, stupid or not, can be explained with "you can't please everybody"  But let us enjoy the finals. It just seems like they should be on equal footing, I mean when Tyler lost that first series that's what sent him to the LB, Painuser also lost a series which sent him to the LB why should series be accounted for and the other not? | ||
|
kojinshugi
Estonia2559 Posts
| ||
|
Windrose
Canada64 Posts
| ||
|
Archvil3
Denmark989 Posts
On November 08 2010 06:37 TedJustice wrote: It's more like Jinro has a smaller advantage because TT1 managed to take a game off of him in the tournament already. Aight wrong word used here I guess. He has a smaller advantage from WINNING 2-1 earlier then if he had not met him at all. Doesnt make it less ridiculous though | ||
|
Kemy
105 Posts
Usually its two best of 3's (if the player coming from LB wins the first one) Now its one extended Best of 7 with scores taken over from the game already played and a best of 3 (if the player coming from the LB wins first one) or an extended Best of 7 with scores taken over from the game already played? | ||
|
ZerOfy
United Kingdom405 Posts
| ||
|
unindel
United States206 Posts
On November 08 2010 06:33 Chibalicious wrote: lol its a disadvantage for Jinro that he beat TT1 already. Had they not met before Jinro would have to win 2 times, worst case 3 if he lost first Bo3 1-2 while TT1 would have to win 4 no matter the outcome of first Bo3. In the current situation Jinro have to win 2 while TT1 has to win 3 before Jinro wins 2. This cant be changed but without the extended series Jinro would in best case only have to win 2 to 4, instead of 2 to 3. It isn't necessarily a disadvantage. Let's say he wins the first game now, then loses the next two. In a non-extended format he would lose that first bo3 and they would move to the 2nd where he would have to win 2 more. In this format, he can still go ahead and win just one more game and win the whole thing. | ||
|
Deleted User 3420
24492 Posts
On November 08 2010 06:40 Baarn wrote: Could you stop derailing the thread with a topic of others threads? Go discuss it there. umm, it's not like there is something else important to be discussing right now when the games start im sure we will be talking about that | ||
| ||
