• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 21:57
CEST 03:57
KST 10:57
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Code S RO8 Preview: herO, Zoun, Bunny, Classic3Code S RO8 Preview: Rogue, GuMiho, Solar, Maru3BGE Stara Zagora 2025: Info & Preview27Code S RO12 Preview: GuMiho, Bunny, SHIN, ByuN3The Memories We Share - Facing the Final(?) GSL47
Community News
BGE Stara Zagora 2025 - Replay Pack2Weekly Cups (June 2-8): herO doubles down1[BSL20] ProLeague: Bracket Stage & Dates9GSL Ro4 and Finals moved to Sunday June 15th13Weekly Cups (May 27-June 1): ByuN goes back-to-back0
StarCraft 2
General
Code S RO8 Preview: herO, Zoun, Bunny, Classic Jim claims he and Firefly were involved in match-fixing The SCII GOAT: A statistical Evaluation DreamHack Dallas 2025 - Official Replay Pack BGE Stara Zagora 2025 - Replay Pack
Tourneys
[GSL 2025] Code S:Season 2 - RO8 - Group A RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series SOOPer7s Showmatches 2025 Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond)
Strategy
[G] Darkgrid Layout Simple Questions Simple Answers [G] PvT Cheese: 13 Gate Proxy Robo
Custom Maps
[UMS] Zillion Zerglings
External Content
Mutation # 477 Slow and Steady Mutation # 476 Charnel House Mutation # 475 Hard Target Mutation # 474 Futile Resistance
Brood War
General
BGH auto balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ BW General Discussion FlaSh Witnesses SCV Pull Off the Impossible vs Shu StarCraft & BroodWar Campaign Speedrun Quest Will foreigners ever be able to challenge Koreans?
Tourneys
NA Team League 6/8/2025 [ASL19] Grand Finals [BSL20] GosuLeague RO16 - Tue & Wed 20:00+CET [Megathread] Daily Proleagues
Strategy
I am doing this better than progamers do. [G] How to get started on ladder as a new Z player
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread Beyond All Reason Path of Exile What do you want from future RTS games?
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Wizard Hilton Cybertech Crypto Recovery: Proven Re
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine UK Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Vape Nation Thread
Fan Clubs
Maru Fan Club Serral Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Korean Music Discussion [Manga] One Piece
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion NHL Playoffs 2024
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
A Better Routine For Progame…
TrAiDoS
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Heero Yuy & the Tax…
KrillinFromwales
I was completely wrong ab…
jameswatts
Need Your Help/Advice
Glider
Trip to the Zoo
micronesia
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 27099 users

[G] TvP Mech Build - Page 4

Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Strategy
Post a Reply
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next All
iAmJeffReY
Profile Joined August 2010
United States4262 Posts
January 28 2013 01:48 GMT
#61
On January 28 2013 10:10 kollin wrote:
No I think we disagree. I'm saying in every other matchup, mech is essentially the same as it was in BW, but not TvP because people build thors which despite being mechanical units do not fit in with the underlying concept of the mech army.

...underlying concept of mech. As in what people think...which is an opinion. Just because it doesn't fit into what you call mech....it's mech. What does that litttttttle adjective under the thor attack and armor levels say...?

MECHANICAL

Stop the trivial "this isn't mech" arguments.
Unbiased biased terran abuser Jeffrey. Sorry for the rage, friend!
EliteLegend
Profile Blog Joined February 2012
Canada57 Posts
January 28 2013 22:37 GMT
#62
Sigh i need to explain something as allot of people i guess are just dumb. My build is meant for a TIMING to hit vs protoss I AM NOT saying build thors all game, nor am i saying don't build tanks. This build ALLOWS you the time to build your 3rd upgrades and most importantly ghost tech. The attack hits very strong and can kill the 3rd or his entire army allot of the time. The first push delays his economy and more importantly and chance of him attacking you any time because he has to rebuild his army and his tech before he does that. Also allot of people saying lol 2 base all in. It can be a 2 base all in if you identify that he is going to die to the push and just reinforce hellions and tanks(fast build times). However you can always just throw couple off cc's, a 2nd armory and start pumping tanks and more fac's. and most importantly get some ghosts out. Remember the point of the thors is to snipe obs and to strike cannon immortals, which tanks can't do. I'm not saying don't build tanks im saying start off with thors then transition later. Hope the clears up any confusion.
kollin
Profile Blog Joined March 2011
United Kingdom8380 Posts
January 28 2013 22:54 GMT
#63
Thank you for insulting me in the first sentence of your post. That is quite appreciated. I realise what your build is and what you intend it to be. However, it is a 2 base all in, as if you do not do a huge amount of economical damage to your opponent you lose. You cannot reinforce with tanks because the armor upgrade is bad on them, and you don't have siege mode. You cannot reinforce with thors because building 2 a minute will be insta death to a counter attack from Protoss. So what can you reinforce with? Nothing, because you screwed yourself over after all inning and not winning.

In response to iAmJeffrey, mech is a concept not a label and should be treated as a concept and nothing else.
EliteLegend
Profile Blog Joined February 2012
Canada57 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-01-28 23:06:45
January 28 2013 23:05 GMT
#64
Ok sorry kolling if that came across to you but its not only to you its to everyone. Also sorry i said that, that was kinda stupid. Anyway the point you made about potential counter attacks can be true however this timing is so strong that allot of the time they simply don't have the army to counter attack even if they do hold it. And more importantly if identify that he going to counter attack you can research siege and get tanks and make a sim city while you counter attack with hellions and banshees. This will for sure cause huge eco loss for him. if he pulled back good you have the time to stabilize. if he goes in for the kill you can lift your 3rd and just mass repair your super sim city with tanks behind them. even if you loss allot you should ok because of the counter attack damage you caused so much eco loss. And dont forget its very hard for the protoss player to have a army to destroy mine at the 14:30 mark its just physicaly impossible to have eco/tech/army at the same time you can only have 2 of the 3 and in each case you can kill most of his army. Hope that helps and sorry for being kind of defensive
kollin
Profile Blog Joined March 2011
United Kingdom8380 Posts
January 28 2013 23:12 GMT
#65
So after your attack, you have the money to double expand, add on production an armory a barracks a ghost academy as well as sim city, after you just killed some of your SCV's on 2 bases. That doesn't seem likely. Furthermore, at the 14:30 mark a Protoss can quite easily have a sizeable immortal archon army, which you may not be able to engage if the Protoss isn't dumb and microes correctly.
Yoshi Kirishima
Profile Blog Joined July 2009
United States10321 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-01-28 23:15:15
January 28 2013 23:12 GMT
#66
On January 28 2013 10:48 iAmJeffReY wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 28 2013 10:10 kollin wrote:
No I think we disagree. I'm saying in every other matchup, mech is essentially the same as it was in BW, but not TvP because people build thors which despite being mechanical units do not fit in with the underlying concept of the mech army.

...underlying concept of mech. As in what people think...which is an opinion. Just because it doesn't fit into what you call mech....it's mech. What does that litttttttle adjective under the thor attack and armor levels say...?

MECHANICAL

Stop the trivial "this isn't mech" arguments.


I agree with you. I'm sick and tired of this. MECH has always meant factory units -- even for you BW fans. What is so hard to understand about it? And if you cannot except that -- stop claiming that your opinion is official, because I don't believe Blizzard ever said anything about what is mech and what isn't.

(Now just a quick note: because of the mechanical unit status in SC2, there is a newer but less common meaning that mech = factory/starport, though I don't agree with changing the term that way because you wouldn't call Colossi nor Sentries mech...)

Here's a very simple argument:
Bio in SC1 and SC2 are different.
Mech in SC1 and SC2 are different.
Do you still call bio in SC2 bio? Yes.
Should you call mech in SC2 mech? Yes.
Do bio and mech still fit their rough opposite concepts of "fast, mobile, weak" and "slow, immobile, strong"? Yes.
Are Goliaths Tanks? No.
Are Thors Tanks? No.
Are Goliaths a mech unit? Yes. Are they a tank? No.
Are Thors a mech unit? Yes. Are they a tank? No.

Other random stuff: Bio can be played both like... bio, but it can also be more positional. Look at Bomber's TvZ marine tank for example. He turtles and plays like a mech player. Is this mech? No, it's positional bio play that has similarities to mech.

Mech can be played like bio... AKA thor based compositions. It's more mobile than tanks, but it's still immobile, slow, and strong, and although much less positional than a tank, it has positional usage in situations that bio units do not. Does this mean you suddenly call this bio...?

Mech is the entire factory tech tree and any combination of strategy/composition within that tech tree. I don't see what's so hard to understand? Tank heavy mech play isn't the only way to play mech, similar to as how harassing and dropping everywhere isn't the only way to play bio.
Mid-master streaming MECH ONLY + commentary www.twitch.tv/yoshikirishima +++ "If all-in fails, all-in again."
kollin
Profile Blog Joined March 2011
United Kingdom8380 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-01-28 23:19:55
January 28 2013 23:17 GMT
#67
On January 29 2013 08:12 Yoshi Kirishima wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 28 2013 10:48 iAmJeffReY wrote:
On January 28 2013 10:10 kollin wrote:
No I think we disagree. I'm saying in every other matchup, mech is essentially the same as it was in BW, but not TvP because people build thors which despite being mechanical units do not fit in with the underlying concept of the mech army.

...underlying concept of mech. As in what people think...which is an opinion. Just because it doesn't fit into what you call mech....it's mech. What does that litttttttle adjective under the thor attack and armor levels say...?

MECHANICAL

Stop the trivial "this isn't mech" arguments.


I agree with you. I'm sick and tired of this. MECH has always meant factory units -- even for you BW fans. What is so hard to understand about it? And if you cannot except that -- stop claiming that your opinion is official, because I don't believe Blizzard ever said anything about what is mech and what isn't.

(Now just a quick note: because of the mechanical unit status in SC2, there is a newer but less common meaning that mech = factory/starport, though I don't agree with changing the term that way because you wouldn't call Colossi nor Sentries mech...)

Here's a very simple argument:
Bio in SC1 and SC2 are different.
Mech in SC1 and SC2 are different.
Do you still call bio in SC2 bio? Yes.
Should you call mech in SC2 mech? Yes.
Do bio and mech still fit their rough opposite concepts of "fast, mobile, weak" and "slow, immobile, strong"? Yes.
Are Goliaths Tanks? No.
Are Thors Tanks? No.
Are Goliaths a mech unit? Yes. Are they a tank? No.
Are Thors a mech unit? Yes. Are they a tank? No.


Mech always meant factory units in BW, a game in which every single factory unit had its own specific role and could be clearly identified from every single other unit in the terran arsenal. Bio in BW and SC2 aren't that different, admittedly you don't have the marauder but apart from that the same concept of marines and then healing units and the ghosts (science vessels in BW) still applies. Goliaths are a mech unit because they require the Charon Boosters upgrade to be good. When you d have it, you have to know how to position your goliaths or you die. You have to know how to position your tanks and your spider mines, or you die. In Starcraft 2, mech has apparently turned into A-move your blob of unmicroeable death into mine and we will see who wins.

EDIT: Out of interest, what positional based tactics can you do with a thor?
kollin
Profile Blog Joined March 2011
United Kingdom8380 Posts
January 28 2013 23:22 GMT
#68
Also, Bomber's TvZ is centred around hitting timing attacks and then sending wave after wave of units at his opponent until he breaks through. That is not 'mech-like' that is efficiently executing a timing and then using the advantages of bio, fast reinforce time, to keep going with your aggression.
Yoshi Kirishima
Profile Blog Joined July 2009
United States10321 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-01-28 23:29:16
January 28 2013 23:23 GMT
#69
What kind of arbitrary requirement or rule is that? That Goliaths are mech and not thors simply because goliaths have an upgrade in the factory tech tree? What if I were to say that I think goliaths aren't mech units because I think requiring an armory is more tech heavy than a goliath needing to upgrade charon booster?

You say bio isn't that different, that's not the point. The point is that it IS different.

Again -- there are different styles for both bio and mech in SC2. And you say mech is unmicroeable, which is untrue. When you exaggerate and leave out so many details, it's impossible to properly discuss anything. I think we can all agree that all units are microeable and that you should always micro them to the best potential if you want to win. Even a bio player who is very ahead can just A-move, does that mean that bio isn't bio anymore because they won the game through A-moving and not dropping and harassing?


About Bomber's TvZ -- it's not EXACTLY like BW tank heavy mech. You cannot be EXACTLY the same -- it's all subjective. I'm not saying he's playing exactly like BW mech, but rather there are qualities that are attributed to either Bio or Mech (or both), and Bomber's play is just one example that mixes qualities from both tech trees. Some qualities of why Bomber's TvZ has aspects similar to mech for example -- it's very turtley and defensive, instead of relying on microing a bunch of units in small numbers. He relies more on t he positioning of the attack, and sieging up, similar to mech, as positioning for mech is more important than the actual battle micro (nothing much you can do besides target fire).


About Thors -- for example, splitting them up against blings or spreading them around to cover your tanks from Mutalisks. Now, for the banelings, I'm being serious -- if you remember Nada vs Nestea on bel'shir beach, Nada clumped up all his units for a brief period and Nestea saw that and killed him with mass banelings, regardless of all the blue flame hellions in front of Nada's Thors. Going back even further, Boxer vs Zenio on Terminus -- he avoided this fate by splitting up his Thors and moving them forward carefully. This was before BL/inefstor was super popular as it is now, and they still used bling/ling/muta often with roach/infestor support.
Mid-master streaming MECH ONLY + commentary www.twitch.tv/yoshikirishima +++ "If all-in fails, all-in again."
kollin
Profile Blog Joined March 2011
United Kingdom8380 Posts
January 28 2013 23:32 GMT
#70
Your arguments have stopped making sense. You don't even know what you are talking about in regards to BW mech and clearly did not read what I wrote, and if you did failed to comprehend it. My first, and rather irrelevant point would be goliaths did need an armory to be built. Next, thors do not require any positioning and you still have not provided an example where they do. Goliaths did because they were a bit squishy and had a weak ground attack.

You say bio isn't that different, that's not the point. The point is that it IS different

I'm not quite sure what you mean here, I counteracted what you said and you seem to respond b saying 'No that's wrong' without using evidence or reasoning to back up that claim.

If we take what you say as true, that an army comprised of only thors is a mech army, then it is unmicroeable, apart from Strike Cannons which are useless against everything other than immortals anyway. The standard tank hellion style of mech does not require a great deal of micro, yes some, but not much as it is more about positioning more than anything else. Finally, what makes bio what it is is not that you have to micro in a fight. It is that you have to be the aggressor most of the time, the one who is dodging in and out poking holes in your opponent until you can break through, using quick reinforce time to help you do that.
kollin
Profile Blog Joined March 2011
United Kingdom8380 Posts
January 28 2013 23:34 GMT
#71
Whatever, this argument is not worth it, you have your opinion I have mine. Good night.
Yoshi Kirishima
Profile Blog Joined July 2009
United States10321 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-01-28 23:42:42
January 28 2013 23:41 GMT
#72
Yes, but an armory in SC1 and SC2 are different -- for example, in SC2 it is more expensive. And all the other differences in the game. What I was saying with that little part is that you can't compare the game 1:1.

My point regarding bio being different, is not saying you are wrong. Also you did not counter my point at all. You said it's not very different, which means it IS different. Therefore you are in agreement with me, and the rest of my logic (for now) is true.

Basically that argument was saying that you cannot (objectively) say that mass thors are not mech since they are factory units. It's like a double standard, saying that "bio is different, but barracks heavy comps are still bio in SC2" while you're making mass thors an exception.

My evidence or reasoning? That was in the rest of my argument.

Again maybe it's just because I was editing my post, I have provided examples where Thors have been micro'd. Also there is no way you can claim that Thors, a unit that is controllable by a player, is not microeable. And if you are exaggerating, that really doesn't help discussions.

I am not defining bio solely by the micro in fights. However, the emphasis (due to limit of time) for bio is placed more heavily on the micro in fights, while the emphasis for mech is more on the positioning. For example, siege tanks sieged late or in the wrong spot can be really really hurtful, while it's not so bad with bio. Exactly as you say, tank hellion style is more about positioning.

Might I also add that bio did not even work lategame in SC1? Therefore, tvp bio in SC2 is quite different from tvp bio in SC1. Do you still consider tvp bio in SC2 to be bio?
Mid-master streaming MECH ONLY + commentary www.twitch.tv/yoshikirishima +++ "If all-in fails, all-in again."
kollin
Profile Blog Joined March 2011
United Kingdom8380 Posts
January 28 2013 23:42 GMT
#73
Yes it did work late game SK Terran in TvZ. I am actually exhausted so that's the only thing I can be bothered to say ^^
Yoshi Kirishima
Profile Blog Joined July 2009
United States10321 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-01-28 23:50:02
January 28 2013 23:48 GMT
#74
I said TvP not TvZ haha, but ok goodnight z66


After reading some of the earlier comments:

For immortal busts, can't you simply defend with mass repair + 5 bunkers and focus down immortals with banshees?

Regarding 6 gate, I thought it was commonly believed that a expand (gasless or with gas) can defend with 2 thors + bunkers in time? Because back then MVP would always do some sort of 111 expand or expand into 111 into 222 build TvP. Also if he's doing a super early all-in 6 gate you can tell by his probe count, and should be able to adjust by going either tanks or thors or just making a loot of bunkers, etc.

(might need to adapt and get thors out before banshees or cut hellions, etc.)
Mid-master streaming MECH ONLY + commentary www.twitch.tv/yoshikirishima +++ "If all-in fails, all-in again."
kollin
Profile Blog Joined March 2011
United Kingdom8380 Posts
January 28 2013 23:52 GMT
#75
Ok final, final comment. I promise. TvP bio was never viable unless as some weird one base all in that hasnt worked for years anyway.
llIH
Profile Joined June 2011
Norway2142 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-01-29 11:42:31
January 29 2013 11:41 GMT
#76
I appreciate you all for debating this in here. I learned a lot just by reading your comments. Thank you all.
For me. I don't think it matters what mech play means. But I like new type of strategies that are different from the current meta game. I personally like Marine+Tank composition vs protoss. Add some banshees into that now and then. I especially like the Siege tank + marine push from 2 base.

From what I have read. The only thing I like thors for is the strike cannon against immortals. It actually kills the immortal with +1 armor (it also kills a colossus with +1 armor). I found that quite interesting.
Targe
Profile Blog Joined February 2012
United Kingdom14103 Posts
January 29 2013 12:15 GMT
#77
What happens if you just feedback thors?

You don't seem to be understanding what people mean by no tanks btw, they are talking about the tank being the basis of mech, the basis of your composition is Thor banshee and whilst yes it is mechanical, It doesn't fulfill the concept of mech play. It would better be summed up by factory play.

Not to detract from the build, I'm sure it works, but it's not true mech in what most people believe.
11/5/14 CATACLYSM | The South West's worst Falco main
llIH
Profile Joined June 2011
Norway2142 Posts
January 29 2013 14:11 GMT
#78
I don't understand why people care about if it is called mech or whatever you want to call it. It doesn't matter. The build is still the same.

Feedback removes energy and damages the thors.
Chaggi
Profile Joined August 2010
Korea (South)1936 Posts
January 29 2013 14:32 GMT
#79
Could this build defend all in's? or rather, what would happen if you scout 2 gas? how would you try and defend stuff that might come out of 2 gas (blink stalkers, void ray's etc)
Targe
Profile Blog Joined February 2012
United Kingdom14103 Posts
January 29 2013 15:01 GMT
#80
On January 29 2013 23:11 KAB00000000M wrote:
I don't understand why people care about if it is called mech or whatever you want to call it. It doesn't matter. The build is still the same.

Feedback removes energy and damages the thors.


I know what feedback does, I'm interested in what happens if you go up against someone who got ht instead of colossi first. They would be able to feedback both thors and banshees.

The reason people care about it being mech or not is because people came here expecting a mech build, which this, by traditional ideas of mech, is not.
11/5/14 CATACLYSM | The South West's worst Falco main
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Online Event
00:00
LATAM SC2 League: Semifinals
CranKy Ducklings82
Liquipedia
GSL
23:00
Replay Cast
Rogue vs GuMiho
Maru vs Solar
PiGStarcraft580
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
PiGStarcraft580
RuFF_SC2 175
CosmosSc2 66
Nina 60
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 21918
Rain 1754
Artosis 858
Noble 27
Icarus 5
Dota 2
ROOTCatZ9
LuMiX2
Counter-Strike
Coldzera 374
Super Smash Bros
hungrybox884
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor145
Other Games
summit1g12624
shahzam1499
C9.Mang0536
JimRising 408
ViBE226
Maynarde124
ToD84
Organizations
Dota 2
PGL Dota 2 - Main Stream5081
Other Games
gamesdonequick1005
BasetradeTV97
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 14 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH259
• Hupsaiya 67
• davetesta35
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Doublelift5411
Upcoming Events
Replay Cast
3m
GSL Code S
7h 33m
herO vs Zoun
Classic vs Bunny
The PondCast
8h 3m
Replay Cast
22h 3m
WardiTV Invitational
1d 9h
OSC
1d 11h
Korean StarCraft League
2 days
SOOP
2 days
sOs vs Percival
CranKy Ducklings
2 days
WardiTV Invitational
2 days
[ Show More ]
Cheesadelphia
2 days
CSO Cup
2 days
GSL Code S
3 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
3 days
Replay Cast
3 days
Wardi Open
4 days
Replay Cast
4 days
Replay Cast
5 days
RSL Revival
5 days
Cure vs Percival
ByuN vs Spirit
RSL Revival
6 days
herO vs sOs
Zoun vs Clem
Replay Cast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSL Season 17: Qualifier 2
BGE Stara Zagora 2025
Heroes 10 EU

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
BSL 2v2 Season 3
BSL Season 20
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 2
NPSL S3
Rose Open S1
CSL 17: 2025 SUMMER
2025 GSL S2
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters
CCT Season 2 Global Finals
IEM Melbourne 2025
YaLLa Compass Qatar 2025
PGL Bucharest 2025
BLAST Open Spring 2025

Upcoming

Copa Latinoamericana 4
CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
K-Championship
SEL Season 2 Championship
Esports World Cup 2025
HSC XXVII
Championship of Russia 2025
Murky Cup #2
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.