| Forum Index > SC2 Maps & Custom Games |
|
winpark
Korea (South)68 Posts
![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/iX11SFx.jpg) Overview ![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/Tr3pBug.jpg) *Map Name : Crux Merry-go-round (회전목마) *Published : KR/AM/EU/SEA *Size : 160x166 *Players : 2 - 3 Created by Crux_Winpark(=WinparkPrime) Teamcrux.tistory.com SC2Prime.com winpark21@gmail.com Distances: 47 seconds(Nat. to Nat.) Thanks to Crux_Eastwindy | ||
|
fedexfan
Bulgaria40 Posts
| ||
|
Phaenoman
568 Posts
But nice map! | ||
|
Big J
Austria16289 Posts
On December 31 2013 00:46 Phaenoman wrote: It's very unfortunate that the degree of symmetry of a 3 or 5 player map can not be as high as that of 2 or 4 player maps caused by the fact that ramps and cliffs can only have direction of (n x 45°). But nice map! Since "rotational symmetry" means massive assymetry in close positions and we use such maps all the time, I dont see a problem with such tiny extra assymetry. Nice map! | ||
|
Arceus
Vietnam8333 Posts
| ||
|
enord
France258 Posts
not so fond of 50 shades of grey though :^{ | ||
FlaShFTW
United States10528 Posts
| ||
|
InfCereal
Canada1759 Posts
On January 01 2014 02:50 FlaShFTW wrote: 3rd seems kinda hard to take especially with that higher ground above the 3rds in the counter-clockwise direction. You can actually take the base in the clockwise direction as the third. I think it might be closer, in general to be honest. | ||
|
-NegativeZero-
United States2142 Posts
On January 01 2014 06:14 InfCereal wrote: You can actually take the base in the clockwise direction as the third. I think it might be closer, in general to be honest. But with this map layout you need to be able to expand in either direction to prevent massive positional imbalance. | ||
|
winpark
Korea (South)68 Posts
| ||
|
Gene(S)is
Sweden419 Posts
| ||
|
NewSunshine
United States5938 Posts
| ||
|
Existor
Russian Federation4295 Posts
| ||
|
FlaShFTW
United States10528 Posts
| ||
|
winpark
Korea (South)68 Posts
| ||
|
FlaShFTW
United States10528 Posts
![[image loading]](http://puu.sh/6bWPk.png) i meant keep the rocks that point the to outer ring while removing the rocks that are in the center of the map. hope that clears up any issues  | ||
|
iMrising
United States1099 Posts
| ||
|
-NegativeZero-
United States2142 Posts
On January 07 2014 15:52 iMrising wrote: I feel like there should be a tad of airspace at the top in order to make it more equal on all sides. the 12 o clock base has no airspace so its harder to harass w/ mutas etc I'm assuming the forcefield wall around the outside marks the edge of flight-blocked areas, so all of the bases have an equal lack of airspace. | ||
|
winpark
Korea (South)68 Posts
| ||
|
winpark
Korea (South)68 Posts
![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/TJvKYV9.jpg) I tried to reduce massive positional imbalance. | ||
| ||
The PiG Daily
Best Games of SC
ByuN vs Clem
MaxPax vs TBD
Serral vs ByuN
GgMaChine vs Bunny
PiGStarcraft791
[ Submit Event ] |
|
StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Dota 2 League of Legends Counter-Strike Super Smash Bros Heroes of the Storm Other Games |
|
RSL Revival
Clem vs Lambo
Scarlett vs Cure
CranKy Ducklings
Epic.LAN
IPSL
Dragon vs Hawk
RSL Revival
Classic vs Trap
herO vs SHIN
Sparkling Tuna Cup
OSC
IPSL
Bonyth vs Ret
WardiTV Weekly
Monday Night Weeklies
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
