• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 07:20
CEST 13:20
KST 20:20
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Code S RO8 Preview: herO, Zoun, Bunny, Classic7Code S RO8 Preview: Rogue, GuMiho, Solar, Maru3BGE Stara Zagora 2025: Info & Preview27Code S RO12 Preview: GuMiho, Bunny, SHIN, ByuN3The Memories We Share - Facing the Final(?) GSL47
Community News
BGE Stara Zagora 2025 - Replay Pack2Weekly Cups (June 2-8): herO doubles down1[BSL20] ProLeague: Bracket Stage & Dates9GSL Ro4 and Finals moved to Sunday June 15th13Weekly Cups (May 27-June 1): ByuN goes back-to-back0
StarCraft 2
General
Code S RO8 Preview: herO, Zoun, Bunny, Classic The SCII GOAT: A statistical Evaluation Jim claims he and Firefly were involved in match-fixing DreamHack Dallas 2025 - Official Replay Pack BGE Stara Zagora 2025 - Replay Pack
Tourneys
[GSL 2025] Code S: Season 2 - Ro8 - Group B [GSL 2025] Code S: Season 2 - Ro8 - Group A RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series SOOPer7s Showmatches 2025 Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament
Strategy
[G] Darkgrid Layout Simple Questions Simple Answers [G] PvT Cheese: 13 Gate Proxy Robo
Custom Maps
[UMS] Zillion Zerglings
External Content
Mutation # 477 Slow and Steady Mutation # 476 Charnel House Mutation # 475 Hard Target Mutation # 474 Futile Resistance
Brood War
General
FlaSh Witnesses SCV Pull Off the Impossible vs Shu BW General Discussion BGH auto balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ StarCraft & BroodWar Campaign Speedrun Quest Will foreigners ever be able to challenge Koreans?
Tourneys
[ASL19] Grand Finals [BSL20] GosuLeague RO16 - Tue & Wed 20:00+CET NA Team League 6/8/2025 [Megathread] Daily Proleagues
Strategy
I am doing this better than progamers do. [G] How to get started on ladder as a new Z player
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread Beyond All Reason Path of Exile What do you want from future RTS games?
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread UK Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Vape Nation Thread
Fan Clubs
Maru Fan Club Serral Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Korean Music Discussion [Manga] One Piece
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion NHL Playoffs 2024
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
A Better Routine For Progame…
TrAiDoS
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Heero Yuy & the Tax…
KrillinFromwales
I was completely wrong ab…
jameswatts
Need Your Help/Advice
Glider
Trip to the Zoo
micronesia
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 28803 users

The Game [N] - Page 161

Forum Index > TL Mafia
Post a Reply
Prev 1 159 160 161 162 163 165 Next
ThePeashooter
Profile Joined March 2013
United States100 Posts
March 31 2013 03:44 GMT
#3201
On March 31 2013 12:39 RyuSuzaku wrote:
I'm gonna call out RoL on the spamming = illegitimate strategy bullshit because his go-to strategy as scum is to lurk and not post until absolutely necessary to avoid a modkill.

If anything, THAT is an illegitimate strategy, given that you purposely only post to avoid a modkill. I myself would strongly consider replacing or modkilling you for that type of strategy in one of my games, because my rules explicitly state that trying to skirt an inactivity modkill will result in one.

Clearly the host this game did not have a problem with spam, otherwise people would have been warned for it. (and if they were, I am not aware of it). Calling it an illegitimate strategy is honestly self-deceptive, almost like a cop-out for not playing well.

You knew me at a different time. I used to post a lot and play a lot regardless of alignment. This is what I absolutely hated and why I stopped playing. I was busy with school/work/gf and didn't have the time to contribute as much as I used to be able to. I'd look at the thread and there would be 50 pages for me to read and I straight up didn't have time.

It had nothing to do with me being scum but somehow everyone assumed it did. I did it as town too and kept getting lynched D3 and had my ass rode until I died for like 5 games straight. I couldn't put in the time because of how much mafia games have changed over the years. That's why I stopped playing and that's why I played this game on a smurf. I didn't feel like getting typed into playing in a specific way based on literally no reasoning. My life and responsibilities have changed since I started playing mafia and so has the current meta of the game itself. With both attributes changing drastically I was unable to play in the same way I used to. It has nothing to do with me flipping scum. Take a look at Insane Mafia, or some of my other games as scum from years ago. I had no issue posting a lot and staying active with the thread. It's just that times have changed.
cosmicomics
Profile Joined March 2013
81 Posts
March 31 2013 03:44 GMT
#3202
On March 31 2013 12:37 Blazinghand wrote:
I remember there was once an 80-person game (that I was only in briefly before it fell apart) and there were several roles called "lurker vigis" which could fire a bullet to shoot a lurker. It worked pretty poorly, but it was a fine idea.

I don't think posting restrictions are the best of ideas, just because it changes the way the game works. That being said, I think the real way to stop spam is the same as the real way to stop lurking: consider it a scumtell and lynch people who do it. Obviously it's not possible for a single person to enforce this, but if enough people believe it, it will become true. And FWIW a certain level of spam probably IS a scumtell. It is anti-town to get into long arguments with everyone for no reason and derail all the useful lynches. Calling players out for this and threatening to lynch them will 1) discourage scum from doing it and 2) discourage town from doing it which could be good.

That is very difficult, as some players just have a natural tendency to post often. E.g. marv posted many one liners as town as FiveTouch if I recall. I didn't read the game that closely but I assume he played a large part in the rompstomp. Something like posting often ... isn't objectively policy enforceable. You would need to force many players to change up their playstyle.

I might try to make an invite normal mini with more consolidate-y post type players to see how that goes first. That way, people can still play normally within regular mafia rules, and we can see the type of gameplay that results.

RyuSuzaku
Profile Joined March 2013
Japan139 Posts
March 31 2013 03:47 GMT
#3203
On March 31 2013 12:44 ThePeashooter wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 31 2013 12:39 RyuSuzaku wrote:
I'm gonna call out RoL on the spamming = illegitimate strategy bullshit because his go-to strategy as scum is to lurk and not post until absolutely necessary to avoid a modkill.

If anything, THAT is an illegitimate strategy, given that you purposely only post to avoid a modkill. I myself would strongly consider replacing or modkilling you for that type of strategy in one of my games, because my rules explicitly state that trying to skirt an inactivity modkill will result in one.

Clearly the host this game did not have a problem with spam, otherwise people would have been warned for it. (and if they were, I am not aware of it). Calling it an illegitimate strategy is honestly self-deceptive, almost like a cop-out for not playing well.

You knew me at a different time. I used to post a lot and play a lot regardless of alignment. This is what I absolutely hated and why I stopped playing. I was busy with school/work/gf and didn't have the time to contribute as much as I used to be able to. I'd look at the thread and there would be 50 pages for me to read and I straight up didn't have time.

It had nothing to do with me being scum but somehow everyone assumed it did. I did it as town too and kept getting lynched D3 and had my ass rode until I died for like 5 games straight. I couldn't put in the time because of how much mafia games have changed over the years. That's why I stopped playing and that's why I played this game on a smurf. I didn't feel like getting typed into playing in a specific way based on literally no reasoning. My life and responsibilities have changed since I started playing mafia and so has the current meta of the game itself. With both attributes changing drastically I was unable to play in the same way I used to. It has nothing to do with me flipping scum. Take a look at Insane Mafia, or some of my other games as scum from years ago. I had no issue posting a lot and staying active with the thread. It's just that times have changed.


fair enough, but it's one thing to frown upon spamming and another thing completely to classify it as "illegitimate".

Obviously no town likes an overly spammy game, just as no town will like an overly inactive game. That's why there's a policy such as lynch all lurkers. If there's a style of play that you don't like or you think is detrimental to town, the onus is on you to push an idea or policy that will limit that type of play.

Taking your approach is not going to improve your play IMO.
Dragon Bird
RebirthOfLeGenD
Profile Blog Joined November 2008
USA5860 Posts
March 31 2013 03:50 GMT
#3204
I think since it is actively discouraging other players from playing for a reason not specifically within the game then it is illegitimate. I see purposely making the game unreadable, or inadvertently making the game unreadable due to constant posting for no reason as a detriment to the game as a whole regardless of alignment.
Be a man, Become a Legend. TL Mafia Forum Ask for access!!
cosmicomics
Profile Joined March 2013
81 Posts
March 31 2013 03:52 GMT
#3205
On March 31 2013 12:38 ThePeashooter wrote:
Cosmic, did you ever know the whole scum team? Like could LayAbout tell you who his whole scum team was?

The mason link was severed after his conversion. I didn't expect him to be converted so early either, and was hoping to write some sort of will to dictate how he should play. That said I think I chalked up his general waffling as a town who was unsure of how to play to his new win con. I don't think he posted anything useful in thread ... yea ...

I figured out kita just by post analysis. I felt his cases were pretty weak and his glurio read awful. I was looking into Ryu because Keir (1st NK) pointed out something about him. When someone like Keir dies instead of Wiggles / Ace / whatever "vet", I'm inclined to look carefully (not to say Keir is a poor player, I just assume vets get shot first unless there is good reason). The post greymist flip blame really stuck out. Doesn't matter if objectively it was true, the attitude was all wrong.

Was looking at Kenpachi and DarthPunk due to process of elimination (town reads). When DP realized that kita and Ryu were scum, I began to consider layabout, but I died soon after so I stopped following the game.
Keirathi
Profile Joined May 2012
United States4679 Posts
March 31 2013 03:52 GMT
#3206
I would much rather play with someone who posts too much than someone who posts 3 times per cycle.
My dear friend if I have gone pants on head, you have gone socks on ears!!! -ShiaoPi
Ace
Profile Blog Joined October 2002
United States16096 Posts
March 31 2013 03:55 GMT
#3207
depends on what they post

3 posts from Fishball are worth about 20 posts from Bill Murray
Math me up, scumboi. - Acrofales
Blazinghand *
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
United States25550 Posts
March 31 2013 03:56 GMT
#3208
On March 31 2013 12:52 Keirathi wrote:
I would much rather play with someone who posts too much than someone who posts 3 times per cycle.


I don't think guys like VE, Mocsta and I are in danger of falling into the latter category. Do you think it's possible that a policy lynch against a spammer would reduce the actively levels of normal players?
When you stare into the iCCup, the iCCup stares back.
TL+ Member
HiroPro
Profile Joined March 2012
United States2624 Posts
March 31 2013 03:58 GMT
#3209
On March 31 2013 12:37 Blazinghand wrote:
I remember there was once an 80-person game (that I was only in briefly before it fell apart) and there were several roles called "lurker vigis" which could fire a bullet to shoot a lurker. It worked pretty poorly, but it was a fine idea.

I don't think posting restrictions are the best of ideas, just because it changes the way the game works. That being said, I think the real way to stop spam is the same as the real way to stop lurking: consider it a scumtell and lynch people who do it. Obviously it's not possible for a single person to enforce this, but if enough people believe it, it will become true. And FWIW a certain level of spam probably IS a scumtell. It is anti-town to get into long arguments with everyone for no reason and derail all the useful lynches. Calling players out for this and threatening to lynch them will 1) discourage scum from doing it and 2) discourage town from doing it which could be good.


I used to think this way but after the last couple of big games that I've seen I'm just not sure anymore. If players won't make any effort to change than something has to be done by hosts.

When you have certain players who are either good or considered good who actively encourage worthless spam in every single game that they play it's incredibly frustrating. I'm not sure if it's because they have an irrational fear of "lurkers" (incidentally if anything these massive post counts only encourage players with less time or inclination to post to avoid posting even more) or if they simply are unable to control themselves, but it's completely ridiculous.
Blazinghand *
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
United States25550 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-03-31 04:00:54
March 31 2013 04:00 GMT
#3210
It might be easiest to run a big game, like this 25-man one, and (openly) give both scum and town a Policy Vigilante role that can be used to shoot either a lurker or a spammer, rather than making a posting restriction. That seems to me to be a "neater" solution. It also is nicer because it solves the problem by giving tools to the players, rather than implementing it via a top-down edict.
When you stare into the iCCup, the iCCup stares back.
TL+ Member
Ace
Profile Blog Joined October 2002
United States16096 Posts
March 31 2013 04:04 GMT
#3211
This might be relevant discussion on policy lynches:
http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=25832&start=25
Math me up, scumboi. - Acrofales
RyuSuzaku
Profile Joined March 2013
Japan139 Posts
March 31 2013 04:04 GMT
#3212
On March 31 2013 12:50 RebirthOfLeGenD wrote:
I think since it is actively discouraging other players from playing for a reason not specifically within the game then it is illegitimate. I see purposely making the game unreadable, or inadvertently making the game unreadable due to constant posting for no reason as a detriment to the game as a whole regardless of alignment.


again, you have this irrational bias against BH because he was scum. What Mocsta and VE did is identical (actually, arguably much worse) yet you have nothing against them because they spammed as town.

This is a huge double standard.

Two solutions to this:

1. request that some sort of rule change be made (and it's unlikely to happen, given how hazy the idea of spamming is-what constitutes it? What's the cutoff? The punishment?)

2. deal with it in-game.

IMO number 2 is unequivocally the better option. Hosts already warn for spam, and there's not much else you can do for it.
Dragon Bird
cosmicomics
Profile Joined March 2013
81 Posts
March 31 2013 04:04 GMT
#3213
Not to be pessimistic or anything, but it's pretty hard to define lurker / spammer no?

I think kitaman was very lurky early game, despite having "good looking posts". I think there are players (I try to emulate this guy) who can produce really good content, but have lower post counts. On the flip side, there are strong town players who are lurky (Foolishness) and "spammy" (marvellosity).
layabout
Profile Blog Joined November 2011
United Kingdom2600 Posts
March 31 2013 04:05 GMT
#3214
I wish you could easily look through the scum qt, when does the "all messages" function cut off?

Just before i was converted the qt cut off and i was unable to communicate with cc outside of the thread.

I wasn't prepared to sacrifice myself when i found out that i would be converted back to mafia. On day4 for instance it would have been best for me to just do nothing let cosmic die and become mafia again. In the end i decided that playing in the spirit of the game was more important than playing optimal and whilst it might have annoyed the mafia team i think it made the game much more interesting.

Be the Best You Can Be ! Play MAFIA II http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/mafia/ II Dragonsound Best Band
Blazinghand *
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
United States25550 Posts
March 31 2013 04:06 GMT
#3215
Well, a Policy Vigilante doesn't HAVE to shoot someone who is lurking or spamming! That's the beauty of it, see? You put this tool in the hands of a townie and he can shoot a lurker or a spammer if he thinks that guy is going against the town wincon. This is why this role is way better than trying to make a rule.
When you stare into the iCCup, the iCCup stares back.
TL+ Member
RyuSuzaku
Profile Joined March 2013
Japan139 Posts
March 31 2013 04:08 GMT
#3216
the policy vig idea is pretty stupid, just give players a regular vig.

It's almost impossible to cleanly define lurking and spamming given that activity standards change with time.

Dragon Bird
Keirathi
Profile Joined May 2012
United States4679 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-03-31 04:28:03
March 31 2013 04:09 GMT
#3217
On March 31 2013 12:56 Blazinghand wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 31 2013 12:52 Keirathi wrote:
I would much rather play with someone who posts too much than someone who posts 3 times per cycle.


I don't think guys like VE, Mocsta and I are in danger of falling into the latter category. Do you think it's possible that a policy lynch against a spammer would reduce the actively levels of normal players?

I dunno.

I wouldn't consider myself a spammer, but I'm going to post what I want to post whenever I want to post it. No "policy" is going to change that.

Part of the problem with the whole "spamming = bad" thing to me is that I just find it much, much easier to read people when they're having an active, back-and-forth conversation with someone than I do from big, contrived posts. In those kinds of conversations, you get people giving their "pure" thoughts, not some watered-down "does this make me look bad? let me word it a bit differently" thoughts.

I understand that if *everyone* is making those kinds of big posts and that that is what the whole game revolves around, then it's just a different type of game style. It requires a different scumhunting strategy. Maybe if I had played in an era where that was the norm, I could understand the desire to move back there, but really I feel like the general play style now is "easier" and therefore open to a broader audience of players.

Edit: I should say that be easier, I mean a simpler "style" in that a lot of it is reading people (which is something we, as humans, do naturally, even if sometimes badly) instead of looking for arbitrary clues that people have to learn.
My dear friend if I have gone pants on head, you have gone socks on ears!!! -ShiaoPi
cosmicomics
Profile Joined March 2013
81 Posts
March 31 2013 04:11 GMT
#3218
On March 31 2013 13:08 RyuSuzaku wrote:
the policy vig idea is pretty stupid, just give players a regular vig.

It's almost impossible to cleanly define lurking and spamming given that activity standards change with time.


Eh, depends on do you want to win the game vs. do you want to improve overall play of TL Mafia (and have less chance winning that specific game)? Because I'd probably keep the vig for a strong scum read (for the sake of winning), rather than shooting into lurkers / players with playstyles I don't like.
slOosh
Profile Joined October 2009
3291 Posts
March 31 2013 04:14 GMT
#3219
On March 31 2013 13:05 layabout wrote:
I wish you could easily look through the scum qt, when does the "all messages" function cut off?

Just before i was converted the qt cut off and i was unable to communicate with cc outside of the thread.

I wasn't prepared to sacrifice myself when i found out that i would be converted back to mafia. On day4 for instance it would have been best for me to just do nothing let cosmic die and become mafia again. In the end i decided that playing in the spirit of the game was more important than playing optimal and whilst it might have annoyed the mafia team i think it made the game much more interesting.

When was this? I was under the impression that all my mirror images would die when I did, otherwise why bother playing to the new win con?
RyuSuzaku
Profile Joined March 2013
Japan139 Posts
March 31 2013 04:16 GMT
#3220
On March 31 2013 13:11 cosmicomics wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 31 2013 13:08 RyuSuzaku wrote:
the policy vig idea is pretty stupid, just give players a regular vig.

It's almost impossible to cleanly define lurking and spamming given that activity standards change with time.


Eh, depends on do you want to win the game vs. do you want to improve overall play of TL Mafia (and have less chance winning that specific game)? Because I'd probably keep the vig for a strong scum read (for the sake of winning), rather than shooting into lurkers / players with playstyles I don't like.


there's literally no difference between a 1 shot policy vig and a 1 shot vig other than one is limited by who you can shoot.

It's also incredibly hard to balance because the cutoffs for spamming/lurking are completely subjective (so to make it fair you'd probably need to do something like have someone who doesn't have the roles determine whether the shot is valid or not) and if you argue that you can add KP for such a role, then you need to balance for that KP.

It's an ugly way to deal with something that arguably isn't a problem that needs to be fixed with roles in the first place.
Dragon Bird
Prev 1 159 160 161 162 163 165 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
The PondCast
10:00
Episode 50
CranKy Ducklings73
Liquipedia
GSL Code S
09:30
Ro8 - Group B
herO vs BunnyLIVE!
Zoun vs TBD
Crank 357
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Crank 357
Lowko259
ProTech106
MindelVK 27
Harstem 13
StarCraft: Brood War
Calm 10518
Hyuk 4849
Sea 3413
Shuttle 861
Mini 588
ZerO 383
actioN 349
EffOrt 300
Stork 246
Soulkey 219
[ Show more ]
Light 193
Last 165
Zeus 156
TY 97
Pusan 77
JulyZerg 64
ToSsGirL 60
Sharp 45
sSak 43
JYJ42
hero 40
Snow 27
NaDa 22
Movie 20
Nal_rA 20
Noble 16
Sea.KH 12
Barracks 11
Icarus 10
HiyA 9
zelot 8
sorry 7
ivOry 4
Dota 2
XcaliburYe675
BananaSlamJamma433
boxi98287
XaKoH 284
Fuzer 238
League of Legends
JimRising 405
Counter-Strike
shoxiejesuss906
kennyS697
Stewie2K405
allub163
Super Smash Bros
Westballz14
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor187
Other Games
singsing2307
C9.Mang0587
crisheroes421
DeMusliM394
B2W.Neo211
Mew2King135
ArmadaUGS8
Organizations
Dota 2
PGL Dota 2 - Secondary Stream9933
StarCraft: Brood War
Kim Chul Min (afreeca) 1137
lovetv 8
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 13 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• Airneanach7
• iopq 1
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Other Games
• WagamamaTV133
Upcoming Events
OSC
9h 40m
Replay Cast
12h 40m
OSC
12h 40m
WardiTV Invitational
23h 40m
OSC
1d 1h
Korean StarCraft League
1d 15h
SOOP
1d 21h
sOs vs Percival
CranKy Ducklings
1d 22h
WardiTV Invitational
1d 23h
Cheesadelphia
2 days
[ Show More ]
CSO Cup
2 days
GSL Code S
2 days
Rogue vs TBD
TBD vs GuMiho
Sparkling Tuna Cup
2 days
Replay Cast
3 days
Wardi Open
3 days
Replay Cast
4 days
Replay Cast
4 days
RSL Revival
4 days
Cure vs Percival
ByuN vs Spirit
RSL Revival
5 days
herO vs sOs
Zoun vs Clem
Replay Cast
6 days
The PondCast
6 days
RSL Revival
6 days
Serral vs SHIN
Solar vs Cham
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSL Season 17: Qualifier 2
BGE Stara Zagora 2025
Heroes 10 EU

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
BSL 2v2 Season 3
BSL Season 20
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 2
NPSL S3
Rose Open S1
CSL 17: 2025 SUMMER
2025 GSL S2
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters
CCT Season 2 Global Finals
IEM Melbourne 2025
YaLLa Compass Qatar 2025
PGL Bucharest 2025
BLAST Open Spring 2025

Upcoming

Copa Latinoamericana 4
CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
K-Championship
SEL Season 2 Championship
Esports World Cup 2025
HSC XXVII
Championship of Russia 2025
Murky Cup #2
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.