Public Profile for Blazinghand

* Now talking on #TLMafia
<Annul> [15:11:31] <Blazinghand> in any case, anyone who programs, whenever they see odinofpergo's name shorted to OOP
<Annul> [15:11:39] <Blazinghand> hears "object oriented programming" in their head
<Annul> i program, but i am also a poker player
<Annul> i see OOP and think "out of position"
<Blazinghand> what's OOP in poker?
<Blazinghand> ah
<Blazinghand> I play poker casually at my company
<Blazinghand> once a month we do a poker night with like 7 or 8 players
<Blazinghand> 20 dollar buy in, and we play using a bunch of chips representing "dollars"
<Blazinghand> at the end of the night whoever has the second most money gets his $20 back
<Blazinghand> the winner gets the rest
<robik> I also think of Out of position
<robik> lol
<Blazinghand> does OOP mean
<Blazinghand> betting first
<Blazinghand> cause betting last is the best right
<Blazinghand> you have the most info
<Annul> yes
<Blazinghand> man look at me Annul I'm like a poker pro already
<Blazinghand> knowing shit like that

On April 01 2011 02:36 BaekHo wrote:In conclusion, I'm gonna clearly state this:

There are certain ways for you to enjoy starcraft ll. It is your choice to whether

1. Stay as who you are , not improving

2. Try to get Better , struggle.


Whoever picks 1 is


even hellion facepalms

nono ofc not. Please dont get me wrong and says, whoever pick "1" is loser and "2" is winner. No no no, never. Its your ways of enjoying starcraft ll. You can either try to get better, but in doing so you are gonna get stressed. Myself, believe it or not, i wanted to quit starcraft ll, but now here i am, top 50 4k Master Terran.

Thanks for those of you who took your time to read this posts, again my english skill is not perfect , "me no engrish~" so if some grammer mistakes disturbs you take it ez. Ez. and I love you TL <3


SlayerSBaekHo (SlayerSBekho .267)


Quotation from BaekHo.

Not everyone who succeed struggled, but those who did succeed definitely struggled and worked hard.

Should our government spend (and borrow) more at negative real interest rates? by Tyler Cowen

I have read so many posts saying yes. But is it so obvious? let’s put aside the stimulus argument, I’d like to focus on the rate of return argument alone.

Let’s say I could borrow money at negative two percent real, but my seven cousins, three of whom are crazy, would get together and decide how to spend it. I would get a vote too and they would agree to spend it on me. I would have to pay it back.

I say no.

Many of the infra-marginal federal dollars are allocated by formula, such as with Social Security, and the cousins don’t have such a big say in the matter. I am grateful for that. But is it possible that the hypothetical new federal spending might be controlled by the cousins? And what if four of them are crazy?

How should I feel about the exorbitant cost overruns on California high speed rail? You know, the line connecting Fresno and Bakersfield? That wasn’t even the crazy cousins at work. (Or was it?)

On September 13 2011 02:52 TheKefka wrote:
This is the equivalent of a patch note that says" Colossus can no longer get vision up cliffs" and than a video showing a Colossus shooting down a fucking viking.

When I installed Google Desktop I searched for fuck on my machine. It turned up this in Java/jdk1.5.0_04/src.zip/com/sun/org/apache/xalan/internal/xsltc/dom/BitArray.java

.
.
}

/**
* This method returns the Nth bit that is set in the bit array. The
* current position is cached in the following 4 variables and will
* help speed up a sequence of next() call in an index iterator. This
* method is a mess, but it is fast and it works, so don't fuck with it.
*/
private int _pos = Integer.MAX_VALUE;