|
If you are already floating gold, there is no need to spend money.
There are 2 main reasons to spend money. Either you want to play arena and neither want to grind gold nor have a high enough winratio to go infinite, or to get cards faster. With 1000 gold, you can play arena for a long time, especially considering dailies + gold rewards, even if you don't have an excessively high winratio. So, spend money if you want cards for a deck faster. The more money you spend, the faster you get cards/dust. Decide how high you value your money vs your time/how high you value playing with better cards. This is not really a decision anyone else can take for you.
If you are talking purely about the gold economy, it once again depends on whether you like arena or not. If you like arena, play that and only spend excess gold on cards. If you don't like arena, there is nothing you can do with gold except buy cards.
|
How to play Mage in constructed without Epics/Legendaries now? Quite impossible... No Pyroblast, no Iceblock means bad Mage.
|
i am not sure whether this is hardware compatibility or not, whenever i watch trump/kripp plays they can do more than 1 action before the animation starts. When i try that in my game i at most can do 2 action before next one, is it connection problem ?
|
What are all of the hidden quests? So far I've gotten two:
100 wins any mode- 100g
Unlock all basic cards (lvl all characters to 10)- 100g
Are there anymore?
|
On December 25 2013 18:36 slam wrote:
What are all of the hidden quests? So far I've gotten two:
100 wins any mode- 100g
Unlock all basic cards (lvl all characters to 10)- 100g
Are there anymore?
This one can be googled.
On December 25 2013 14:16 justiceknight wrote:
i am not sure whether this is hardware compatibility or not, whenever i watch trump/kripp plays they can do more than 1 action before the animation starts. When i try that in my game i at most can do 2 action before next one, is it connection problem ?
I can do more than one action too. I think if the game is on low quality it is less responsive. Maybe your computer is faster.
|
Quick question: in the tutorial #1 found here on TL ("Starting Stone") they advice people to start arena when they are "3 star master". Which rank/level is this? Any rank with 3 stars or what? 
|
On December 26 2013 00:03 JoeTheHoe wrote:Quick question: in the tutorial #1 found here on TL ("Starting Stone") they advice people to start arena when they are "3 star master". Which rank/level is this? Any rank with 3 stars or what?
That was the old rating system. It is no longer in the game.
|
On December 26 2013 00:11 Blitzkrieg0 wrote:Show nested quote +On December 26 2013 00:03 JoeTheHoe wrote:Quick question: in the tutorial #1 found here on TL ("Starting Stone") they advice people to start arena when they are "3 star master". Which rank/level is this? Any rank with 3 stars or what? That was the old rating system. It is no longer in the game.
oh okay. so when do think people are ready for arena? I've played it three times so far but I have the feeling that I am wasting my gold at the moment
|
On December 26 2013 00:18 JoeTheHoe wrote:Show nested quote +On December 26 2013 00:11 Blitzkrieg0 wrote:On December 26 2013 00:03 JoeTheHoe wrote:Quick question: in the tutorial #1 found here on TL ("Starting Stone") they advice people to start arena when they are "3 star master". Which rank/level is this? Any rank with 3 stars or what? That was the old rating system. It is no longer in the game. oh okay. so when do think people are ready for arena? I've played it three times so far but I have the feeling that I am wasting my gold at the moment
Unless you're losing immediately without picking up any wins it is more efficient than buying packs so unless you hate arena there isn't a reason to not play it.
|
On December 26 2013 00:27 Blitzkrieg0 wrote:Show nested quote +On December 26 2013 00:18 JoeTheHoe wrote:On December 26 2013 00:11 Blitzkrieg0 wrote:On December 26 2013 00:03 JoeTheHoe wrote:Quick question: in the tutorial #1 found here on TL ("Starting Stone") they advice people to start arena when they are "3 star master". Which rank/level is this? Any rank with 3 stars or what? That was the old rating system. It is no longer in the game. oh okay. so when do think people are ready for arena? I've played it three times so far but I have the feeling that I am wasting my gold at the moment Unless you're losing immediately without picking up any wins it is more efficient than buying packs so unless you hate arena there isn't a reason to not play it.
Well sure but if I practice more before using my gold for arena I might get more out of it when I actually play it. And I wouldn't buy packs with the gold anyways I will only use it for arena.
|
On December 26 2013 00:30 JoeTheHoe wrote:Show nested quote +On December 26 2013 00:27 Blitzkrieg0 wrote:On December 26 2013 00:18 JoeTheHoe wrote:On December 26 2013 00:11 Blitzkrieg0 wrote:On December 26 2013 00:03 JoeTheHoe wrote:Quick question: in the tutorial #1 found here on TL ("Starting Stone") they advice people to start arena when they are "3 star master". Which rank/level is this? Any rank with 3 stars or what? That was the old rating system. It is no longer in the game. oh okay. so when do think people are ready for arena? I've played it three times so far but I have the feeling that I am wasting my gold at the moment Unless you're losing immediately without picking up any wins it is more efficient than buying packs so unless you hate arena there isn't a reason to not play it. Well sure but if I practice more before using my gold for arena I might get more out of it when I actually play it. And I wouldn't buy packs with the gold anyways I will only use it for arena.
Well I found constructed to be infuriating since my deck is utter crap. Efficiency is great until it ruins your fun of the game.
|
On December 26 2013 00:30 JoeTheHoe wrote:Show nested quote +On December 26 2013 00:27 Blitzkrieg0 wrote:On December 26 2013 00:18 JoeTheHoe wrote:On December 26 2013 00:11 Blitzkrieg0 wrote:On December 26 2013 00:03 JoeTheHoe wrote:Quick question: in the tutorial #1 found here on TL ("Starting Stone") they advice people to start arena when they are "3 star master". Which rank/level is this? Any rank with 3 stars or what? That was the old rating system. It is no longer in the game. oh okay. so when do think people are ready for arena? I've played it three times so far but I have the feeling that I am wasting my gold at the moment Unless you're losing immediately without picking up any wins it is more efficient than buying packs so unless you hate arena there isn't a reason to not play it. Well sure but if I practice more before using my gold for arena I might get more out of it when I actually play it. And I wouldn't buy packs with the gold anyways I will only use it for arena.
if you're not using the gold to buy packs then keep playing arena till you run out of gold, then you can play constructed for both practicing and getting gold
that's basically what I'm doing
|
Should I save up for a legendary or two pyroblasts?
|
On December 26 2013 05:24 Kouda wrote:
Should I save up for a legendary or two pyroblasts?
I find that mage decks now really depend on Pyroblast and Ice Block to get consistent wins, so if you plan to play Mage, you might need Ice Block (also an epic) too to get up the rankings.
|
Germany7651 Posts
Warlock Arena draft. Having to choose between Ragnaros, Ysera and Alexstraza. Any suggestions on which I should take and why?
|
I think its between Rag and Ysera, Alex is too special, most of the time the Battlecry wont do very much damage or heal much in Arena. I'd go with Rag, he is just solid. There is a reason most of the decks in constructed run him 
|
What's good vs Rush decks? I feel mad bomber is good for dealing with blood imp and all the 2-1s like loot hoarder, worgen, and leper gnome. The chance you hit at least one bomb assuming it's the only thing on the board is 1-(.67)^3 or 1 minus the chance he misses all three hits. There is a 33% chance to hit and a 67% chance to miss on each bomb individually. So you have a 70% chance overall to get the blood imp and a 30% chance not to. That 70% chance is the same as
Why have 2 copies of a card in a deck. I rarely ever see combos like equality consecration and even then if you have more cards you can do more combos. Acolyte of pain and mad bomber have synergy as do the armani berserkers. If instead you have two defenders of argus in your hand you might as well only have one since it limits your choices for that turn.
|
On December 27 2013 02:23 obesechicken13 wrote:Why have 2 copies of a card in a deck. I rarely ever see combos like equality consecration and even then if you have more cards you can do more combos. Acolyte of pain and mad bomber have synergy as do the armani berserkers. If instead you have two defenders of argus in your hand you might as well only have one since it limits your choices for that turn.
Having two increases the odds of you getting said combo in your hand, or it may just be a really powerful card, or it may synergize with the deck well. Some people only run one doa for that reason, some decks may only need one, but in a heavy aggro deck it is worth running two because if you have two minions on the board and doa in hand turn 4 it is usually game over.
|
Is there a good website that has nice up-to-date decks? The other ones I've checked are behind meta.
Sorry if this question is redundant, couldn't find the answer anywhere.
|
On December 27 2013 02:33 serum321 wrote:Show nested quote +On December 27 2013 02:23 obesechicken13 wrote:Why have 2 copies of a card in a deck. I rarely ever see combos like equality consecration and even then if you have more cards you can do more combos. Acolyte of pain and mad bomber have synergy as do the armani berserkers. If instead you have two defenders of argus in your hand you might as well only have one since it limits your choices for that turn. Having two increases the odds of you getting said combo in your hand, or it may just be a really powerful card, or it may synergize with the deck well. Some people only run one doa for that reason, some decks may only need one, but in a heavy aggro deck it is worth running two because if you have two minions on the board and doa in hand turn 4 it is usually game over.
Or you could have a Defender of argus and a dark iron dwarf and be able to deal with situations where you need defender half the time and situations where you need dwarf half the time (estimates) instead of just defender of argus situations 70% of the time.
Defender is more of a defensive card than dark iron dwarf imo. If your opponent puts up a big taunt +1/+1 is really strong and it's kind of dumb that one of the strongest defensive cards also grants a ton of offensive stats but you don't really need your own taunts because your units are disposable for taking out their life. You'd rather just destroy their taunts so you can go for their life.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
