EPTPURGE 2008: A month of posting behaviour evaluated - Page 26
| Forum Index > General Forum |
|
QuanticHawk
United States32139 Posts
| ||
|
BluzMan
Russian Federation4235 Posts
| ||
|
Folca
2235 Posts
| ||
|
Mora
Canada5235 Posts
On July 11 2008 02:12 zulu_nation8 wrote: are you a top i used to be an exclusive top. then i used to be an exclusive top except when i was drunk. and now on this most recent occaison i tried bottoming and it hurt like a bitch and im not so sure i want to do it again. maybe if the guy wasn't so fucking huge it would have been fine... and then he and his boyfriend (it was a 3some) had the gaul to ask if i would try taking them both at once. haha yeah. no chance. it was good though. living room, to bedroom, to swimming pool, to bedroom, brief sleep, again in the morning. and the next day i got a free Subway sandwich for breakfast because the [subway's] cash machine died. GOOD TIMES. I LOVE SUBWAY. | ||
|
iNcontroL
USA29055 Posts
| ||
|
SpaCe)Ment-rA
Canada389 Posts
On July 11 2008 00:19 {88}iNcontroL wrote: I do have a talent for drawing people out and them getting banned.. but the "I have a talent" part is misleading. It's more like I have a tendency.. dunno. Anyways a good red flag is when someone starts to debate with me too much. I didn't like that stance at all. I truly hope I misunderstood, but it sounded like: " You guys don't even have to right to argue too much with me. Either way, I will ask my gosu connections to ban you. " I mean, there is an important and fundamental difference between debating politely (like I believe I am doing) and debating without any manners or by insulting everyone (as Baal tends to do). Why should people be banned by debating with you? This seems like a threat to freedom of speech. If you meant that people going BM with you tend to be banned, I'm ok with that. But a tendency to have people banned when they disagree with you and debate? This seems all wrong. -ThE_AdvoCaTe | ||
|
iNcontroL
USA29055 Posts
BUt I couldn't help but notice you said "a threat to freedom of speech." You think US laws are universal? You think this website is American? You think ANY fucking policy where they ban people for what they say is a fucking threat to FREEDOM OF SPEECH? Are you kidding me? | ||
|
SnowFantasy
4173 Posts
| ||
|
DamageControL
United States4222 Posts
| ||
|
SpaCe)Ment-rA
Canada389 Posts
On July 11 2008 05:54 {88}iNcontroL wrote: yeah you misunderstood completely. Glad to hear that. On July 11 2008 05:54 {88}iNcontroL wrote: You think ANY fucking policy where they ban people for what they say is a fucking threat to FREEDOM OF SPEECH? If one's opinion is said politely, yes I do. No I am not kidding you. And don't refer to US laws, I don't know them. I am canadian. Although these laws might be alike. On July 11 2008 05:55 SnowFantasy wrote: Extremely off topic I know but why is your username SpaCe)Ment-rA and at the end you wrote "-ThE_AdvoCaTe"? Because SpaCe)Ment-rA is like this ID I got here since 2005. And my IRC ID (I have been active on TL's IRC channel the past few days) is ThE_AdvoCaTe. So, from time to time, I sign my posts with that nickname so that the people I talked to on IRC can know I am that AdvoCaTe is that Ment-rA guy. Voilà! | ||
|
iNcontroL
USA29055 Posts
Freedom of speech is not a law that transcends the internet. Saying it is being threatened is an arbitrary statement. That is similar to me being frantic that my right to bare arms is being attacked when I get my arms cut off in Ninja Gaiden II. It wouldn't hold in court. I'd get laughed at on the internet and I'd be a moron to think otherwise. Hence my surprise when you asserted that banning someone for what they say on a forum is some kind of attack on freedom of speech. | ||
|
SpaCe)Ment-rA
Canada389 Posts
On July 11 2008 09:20 {88}iNcontroL wrote: Ok lemme speak to you as a Canadian: Freedom of speech is not a law that transcends the internet. You're right. It's a principle, an ideal. There is no necessity for it to be a law over the internet for anyone to defend it. | ||
|
blagoonga123
United States2068 Posts
| ||
|
brian
United States9641 Posts
they let you say a lot, but if you get out of line they will put an end to you. this is their house. sorry Adv. | ||
|
brian
United States9641 Posts
not in the old mans fucking house. | ||
|
perisie xx
429 Posts
| ||
|
perisie xx
429 Posts
| ||
|
SpaCe)Ment-rA
Canada389 Posts
| ||
|
ShaLLoW[baY]
Canada12499 Posts
On July 11 2008 09:20 {88}iNcontroL wrote: That is similar to me being frantic that my right to bare arms is being attacked when I get my arms cut off in Ninja Gaiden II. It wouldn't hold in court. On July 11 2008 09:31 perisie xx wrote: she'd be like trying to let go of your hand but every time you'd just spin her fingers in an elaborate pattern and end up holding her close after every cycle. it'd be like a very subtle form of rape. she wouldn't be able to complain either, she'd be like "omg i'm being raped" and everyone else would be like "oh he's manipulating your fingers" and she'd be like screaming in agony whilst you're just performing common finger tricks and probably getting a decent salary for doing kids shows on the side Two posts that made me laugh. Well played sirs~ | ||
|
hideo
Canada1641 Posts
I've only ever posted when I really felt like typing something out. 7/10? | ||
| ||
