EPTI like Civ VI but I feel it's harder to see things than in Civ V, specifically if I improved a luxury tile (or any title for that matter)
Also not Pitboss multiplayer
((Sid Meier's Civilization VI - Page 45
| Forum Index > General Games |
|
Torte de Lini
Germany38463 Posts
I like Civ VI but I feel it's harder to see things than in Civ V, specifically if I improved a luxury tile (or any title for that matter) Also not Pitboss multiplayer (( | ||
|
TheFish7
United States2824 Posts
On January 06 2018 04:47 Aesthetician wrote: Been loving Civ 6. Aztec is a monster early game, they can really take off if played aggressively. One thing i've noticed as well, is that there seems to be some mechanic that causes deserts to shrink. I was playing a really long (400+ turn) game and i noticed a desert area near my Capital had shrunk from about a 5 hex radius to a 2 hex radius. Not quite sure what makes that happen though. Don't think I've seen that in VI, but in civ 2, there was a climate change mechanic. If you had a ton of industrialization and/or nuclear wars, the whole map could become filled up with swamp and desert tiles. | ||
Legionnaire
Australia4515 Posts
www.humblebundle.com The problem is you have to sign up to their monthly payment deal. (12$ a month and you get a few free games) But you can cancel immediately (or after Feb 2nd when you get a few more games). | ||
|
WindWolf
Sweden11767 Posts
On January 06 2018 04:49 Torte de Lini wrote: How is there no World Congress in Civ VI???? I like Civ VI but I feel it's harder to see things than in Civ V, specifically if I improved a luxury tile (or any title for that matter) Also not Pitboss multiplayer ((World Congress was without a doubt the one mechanic from Civ V that I disliked so much that I'd prefer to not have it in the game. In the super-late game, you could easily get into a position where you did not want to enact anything but the game demanded that you enacted something. And I once got a diplo-victory even though I put zero efforts into it (IIRC I was going for culture victory that game) It really felt like it was in the game to tick of a checkbox. If they bring it back in Civ VI, they better have re-made from scratch. | ||
|
Torte de Lini
Germany38463 Posts
On January 06 2018 17:56 WindWolf wrote: World Congress was without a doubt the one mechanic from Civ V that I disliked so much that I'd prefer to not have it in the game. In the super-late game, you could easily get into a position where you did not want to enact anything but the game demanded that you enacted something. And I once got a diplo-victory even though I put zero efforts into it (IIRC I was going for culture victory that game) It really felt like it was in the game to tick of a checkbox. If they bring it back in Civ VI, they better have re-made from scratch. They should allow you to disable it, simple as that. For multiplayer games, it's a lot of fun | ||
|
{CC}StealthBlue
United States41117 Posts
| ||
|
{CC}StealthBlue
United States41117 Posts
| ||
|
Torte de Lini
Germany38463 Posts
| ||
|
andrewlt
United States7702 Posts
| ||
|
{CC}StealthBlue
United States41117 Posts
Ruled a pretty substantial kingdom. | ||
|
Chairman Ray
United States11903 Posts
| ||
|
Titusmaster6
United States5937 Posts
On January 11 2018 07:11 Chairman Ray wrote: Just got this game from the humble bundle and played 2 games so far. Is it just me or is the AI really bad at warring and getting eurekas and science, but really good at generating culture/tourism and religion? Yep sounds bout right! They are also really good at declaring war on you and being confusing as fuck in diplomacy as well. | ||
|
Vorenius
Denmark1979 Posts
you end up having to catch up the first half of the game, and then you either outscale easily, or the AIs win science victory while you are 4 eras behind. It's such a shame. I probably like the Civ6 mechanics more than any previous Civ game, but the AI just ruins the game. I've sunk a couple hundred hours into it, but I won't get the expansion before I know they've improved the AI. | ||
|
FaCE_1
Canada6185 Posts
On January 11 2018 07:30 Titusmaster6 wrote: Yep sounds bout right! They are also really good at declaring war on you and being confusing as fuck in diplomacy as well. for me this is the worst part, the diplomacy with the AI. | ||
|
Tal
United Kingdom1018 Posts
On January 11 2018 09:13 Vorenius wrote: The AI is completely useless at playing the game, so they try to make up for at it by giving them ridiculous advantages, like starting with a bunch of cities and techs and then huge bonus to production, science etc. you end up having to catch up the first half of the game, and then you either outscale easily, or the AIs win science victory while you are 4 eras behind. It's such a shame. I probably like the Civ6 mechanics more than any previous Civ game, but the AI just ruins the game. I've sunk a couple hundred hours into it, but I won't get the expansion before I know they've improved the AI. Damn, this is a real shame. Apart from the awesome music/general love of history, my main reason for wanting to play 6 is to have a strategic game with better AI than Stellaris. Guess I'll think a bit over this month while Humble Bundle is still on... | ||
|
farvacola
United States18869 Posts
| ||
|
Tal
United Kingdom1018 Posts
On January 11 2018 23:25 farvacola wrote: "Better AI" has never really been a reason to pick up a Civ game lol Haha, a man can dream. Seriously though, I feel like it's the main area people should be innovating in the genre. Everything already looks great, and mechanics are deep enough. Just give me something which makes me think differently... | ||
|
andrewlt
United States7702 Posts
| ||
|
Torte de Lini
Germany38463 Posts
| ||
|
haitike
Spain2744 Posts
On January 11 2018 23:25 farvacola wrote: "Better AI" has never really been a reason to pick up a Civ game lol It can be improved, yes. But, it is Civ6 IA worse than it was in Civ4 / Civ5? Because I don't remember so much "this game is unplayable until they fix the IA" in the previous games. | ||
| ||
